Re: dpkg returned an error code 1
I might have fixed this by simply running: dpkg --configure -a My highest priority was to be able to install mycustompackage.deb. I'm a bit less concerned if I'm slightly behind on qmail versions (or a few other packages). On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 2:54 PM Marco Shaw wrote: > (I'm not sure if I'm on the right track and whether the information below > is everything. I'm still researching and trying to figure out what to do. > There's no backup available. I'm looking for any possible > hints/logs/commands/etc.) > > Debian Wheezy 7.x 32-bit (I know I should upgrade, but bear with me) > > I'm in a bit of a pickle. I tried to upgrade a chroot'ed environment and > it seems I broke dpkg in the process. > > I don't know if the cause of the problems is that apt-get isn't able to > handle a qmail upgrade or if it's something else (it seems snmpd also > didn't "finish" during the last round). > > I think the error I'm trying to address is: > E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) > > I might have some of the information from the console when this first > broke, but it seems I can reproduce as per below. > > It seems I have a very old version of qmail, and upgrading to the one in > my apt mirror is too much of a change. I've googled, and have not been able > to find anything between 1.03-38 and 1.06-5 yet. > > (Removed a few lines and struggled with the formatting) > # apt-get install qmail > The following extra packages will be installed: > qmail-run qmail-uids-gids > Suggested packages: > dot-forward qmail-tools > The following NEW packages will be installed: > qmail-run qmail-uids-gids > The following packages will be upgraded: > qmail > 1 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. > 107 not fully installed or removed. > Do you want to continue [Y/n]? > Get:1 http://10.105.176.67/debian/ wheezy/main snmpd i386 > 5.4.3~dfsg-2.8+deb7u1 [964 kB] > Fetched 964 kB in 0s (6,685 kB/s) > Can not write log, openpty() failed (/dev/pts not mounted?) > (Reading database ... 1852018 files and directories currently installed.) > Preparing to replace qmail 1.03-38 (using > .../archives/qmail_1.06-5_i386.deb) ... > Upgrading from qmail version 1.03-38 is not yet supported. > dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/qmail_1.06-5_i386.deb > (--unpack): > subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 > rmdir: failed to remove `/var/lib/qmail': Directory not empty > insserv: warning: script 'K01qmail' missing LSB tags and overrides > insserv: warning: script 'qmail' missing LSB tags and overrides > dpkg: regarding .../qmail-uids-gids_1.06-5_all.deb containing > qmail-uids-gids: > qmail conflicts with qmail-uids-gids > qmail-uids-gids (version 1.06-5) is to be installed. > dpkg: error processing > /var/cache/apt/archives/qmail-uids-gids_1.06-5_all.deb (--unpack): > conflicting packages - not installing qmail-uids-gids > dpkg: regarding .../qmail-run_2.0.2_all.deb containing qmail-run: > qmail-run conflicts with mail-transport-agent > qmail provides mail-transport-agent and is present and installed. >
Re: dpkg returned an error code 1
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 03:30:37PM -0400, Marco Shaw wrote: > (I'm not sure how well Gmail will format things.) Seems OK, mostly. > Also in my chroot: Ah. You likely forgot to bind-mount the various little things that one has to bind-mount inside a chroot to get full functionality. This is probably not immediately relevant to your problem. Probably. > # dpkg -i /tmp/mycustompackage_i386.deb > Selecting previously unselected package mycustompackage. One has to wonder whether this package is even properly built. > dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of mycustompackage: > mycustompackage depends on libmysqlclient18 (>= 5.5.43-0+deb7u1); however: > Package libmysqlclient18:i386 is not configured yet. > mycustompackage depends on libk5crypto3 (>= 1.10.1+dfsg-5+deb7u3); however: > Package libk5crypto3:i386 is not configured yet. > mycustompackage depends on perl-modules (>= 5.14.2-21+deb7u2); however: > Package perl-modules is not configured yet. > mycustompackage depends on libxml2 (>= 2.8.0+dfsg1-7+wheezy4); however: > Package libxml2:i386 is not configured yet. > mycustompackage depends on libkrb5support0 (>= 1.10.1+dfsg-5+deb7u3); > however: > Package libkrb5support0:i386 is not configured yet. > mycustompackage depends on libcurl3 (>= 7.26.0-1+wheezy17); however: > Package libcurl3:i386 is not configured yet. > mycustompackage depends on libssl1.0.0 (>= 1.0.1t-1+deb7u1); however: > Package libssl1.0.0:i386 is not configured yet. > mycustompackage depends on libxml-libxml-perl (>= 2.0001+dfsg-1+deb7u1); > however: > Package libxml-l The errors cut off here, perhaps due to a cut and paste failure, or perhaps due to something else. I suspect the important bits are in this missing segment. There's some long chain of A depends on B depends on C depends on D... and we need to see the end of this chain.
Re: dpkg returned an error code 1
(I'm not sure how well Gmail will format things.) I'm adding one more piece of information and I've also answered/commented much further below. I tried to install a customer .deb file and it threw these types of errors as copied below. I don't know if this adds/clarifies anything. I'm 99% certain this is the chain of events to where I'm at: 1. I changes the sources.list to point to an Internet site (my local Wheezy repo was badly broken - long story) 2. Installed a whole bunch of updates (including the ones showing "not configured" above, and the qmail and snmpd that are showing errors. Ended up with a "dpkg error 1". 3. Tried to install mycustompackage and see the above error. 4. Tried a apt-get install/dist-upgrade to see if it helps any to help me figure out the problem. Also in my chroot: # dpkg -i /tmp/mycustompackage_i386.deb Selecting previously unselected package mycustompackage. (Reading database ... 1834636 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking mycustompackage (from .../mycustompackage_i386.deb) ... dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of mycustompackage: mycustompackage depends on libmysqlclient18 (>= 5.5.43-0+deb7u1); however: Package libmysqlclient18:i386 is not configured yet. mycustompackage depends on libk5crypto3 (>= 1.10.1+dfsg-5+deb7u3); however: Package libk5crypto3:i386 is not configured yet. mycustompackage depends on perl-modules (>= 5.14.2-21+deb7u2); however: Package perl-modules is not configured yet. mycustompackage depends on libxml2 (>= 2.8.0+dfsg1-7+wheezy4); however: Package libxml2:i386 is not configured yet. mycustompackage depends on libkrb5support0 (>= 1.10.1+dfsg-5+deb7u3); however: Package libkrb5support0:i386 is not configured yet. mycustompackage depends on libcurl3 (>= 7.26.0-1+wheezy17); however: Package libcurl3:i386 is not configured yet. mycustompackage depends on libssl1.0.0 (>= 1.0.1t-1+deb7u1); however: Package libssl1.0.0:i386 is not configured yet. mycustompackage depends on libxml-libxml-perl (>= 2.0001+dfsg-1+deb7u1); however: Package libxml-l dpkg: error processing mycustompackage (--install): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Errors were encountered while processing: mycustompackage On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 3:02 PM Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 02:54:18PM -0400, Marco Shaw wrote: > > # apt-get install qmail > [...] > > Can not write log, openpty() failed (/dev/pts not mounted?) > > Not reassuring. Is this a real computer? Or even a real virtual > machine? If it's some kind of container, well... good luck with that. > > Yes, I think this is related to the chroot. I checked a training video from 2017 and this comes up often. > > Upgrading from qmail version 1.03-38 is not yet supported. > > rmdir: failed to remove `/var/lib/qmail': Directory not empty > > Sounds like you will need to clean up some stuff by hand. > > I will work on that.
Re: dpkg returned an error code 1
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 02:54:18PM -0400, Marco Shaw wrote: > # apt-get install qmail [...] > Can not write log, openpty() failed (/dev/pts not mounted?) Not reassuring. Is this a real computer? Or even a real virtual machine? If it's some kind of container, well... good luck with that. > Upgrading from qmail version 1.03-38 is not yet supported. > rmdir: failed to remove `/var/lib/qmail': Directory not empty Sounds like you will need to clean up some stuff by hand. I recommend that you make a backup of *everything*. Then make a separate backup of just the qmail configuration. Then purge your existing qmail* packages (use --force-depends to prevent it from screaming). Then nuke the directories that it wants you to nuke, like the one shown above. Then install the new qmail* packages, and merge your old configuration into the new configuration, manually.
dpkg returned an error code 1
(I'm not sure if I'm on the right track and whether the information below is everything. I'm still researching and trying to figure out what to do. There's no backup available. I'm looking for any possible hints/logs/commands/etc.) Debian Wheezy 7.x 32-bit (I know I should upgrade, but bear with me) I'm in a bit of a pickle. I tried to upgrade a chroot'ed environment and it seems I broke dpkg in the process. I don't know if the cause of the problems is that apt-get isn't able to handle a qmail upgrade or if it's something else (it seems snmpd also didn't "finish" during the last round). I think the error I'm trying to address is: E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) I might have some of the information from the console when this first broke, but it seems I can reproduce as per below. It seems I have a very old version of qmail, and upgrading to the one in my apt mirror is too much of a change. I've googled, and have not been able to find anything between 1.03-38 and 1.06-5 yet. (Removed a few lines and struggled with the formatting) # apt-get install qmail The following extra packages will be installed: qmail-run qmail-uids-gids Suggested packages: dot-forward qmail-tools The following NEW packages will be installed: qmail-run qmail-uids-gids The following packages will be upgraded: qmail 1 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. 107 not fully installed or removed. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Get:1 http://10.105.176.67/debian/ wheezy/main snmpd i386 5.4.3~dfsg-2.8+deb7u1 [964 kB] Fetched 964 kB in 0s (6,685 kB/s) Can not write log, openpty() failed (/dev/pts not mounted?) (Reading database ... 1852018 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace qmail 1.03-38 (using .../archives/qmail_1.06-5_i386.deb) ... Upgrading from qmail version 1.03-38 is not yet supported. dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/qmail_1.06-5_i386.deb (--unpack): subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 rmdir: failed to remove `/var/lib/qmail': Directory not empty insserv: warning: script 'K01qmail' missing LSB tags and overrides insserv: warning: script 'qmail' missing LSB tags and overrides dpkg: regarding .../qmail-uids-gids_1.06-5_all.deb containing qmail-uids-gids: qmail conflicts with qmail-uids-gids qmail-uids-gids (version 1.06-5) is to be installed. dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/qmail-uids-gids_1.06-5_all.deb (--unpack): conflicting packages - not installing qmail-uids-gids dpkg: regarding .../qmail-run_2.0.2_all.deb containing qmail-run: qmail-run conflicts with mail-transport-agent qmail provides mail-transport-agent and is present and installed.
Re: Error code 1...........
2014/10/23 12:57 Charles Kroeger ckro...@frankensteinface.com: On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:30:02 +0200 Charlie aries...@ipstarmail.com.au wrote: E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) When I encountered this error (which was mentioned on this list a few days ago) I purged the linjpeg-turbo-progs package (on which apparently nothing depended because it went without complaint) and then resumed my upgrade; the error went away. But maybe that's not the right way to do it. I get a code (1) on every dist-upgrade for some time now..maybe two weeks, can't remember but if I run: apt-get -f install apt-get goes on to setup the packages it downloaded. If the dist-upgrade message says it it going to remove a lot of packages I run instead: apt-get -u upgrade I continue this command until a dist-upgrade returns to sanity. Probably a meaningless suggestion, but have you tried apt-get clean ? -- Joel Rees Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens. All is a stream of text flowing from the past into the future.
Re: Error code 1...........
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:10:01 +0200 Joel Rees joel.r...@gmail.com wrote: Probably a meaningless suggestion, but have you tried apt-get clean ? Yes once in a while, but I use: apt-get autoclean instead and that's before making a weekly image using terabyte image for Linux. (and windows if you like) it is non-free like Weihenstephaner hefe weissbier. -- CK -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/casn9lfod6...@mid.individual.net
Re: Error code 1...........
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:30:02 +0200 Charlie aries...@ipstarmail.com.au wrote: E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) When I encountered this error (which was mentioned on this list a few days ago) I purged the linjpeg-turbo-progs package (on which apparently nothing depended because it went without complaint) and then resumed my upgrade; the error went away. But maybe that's not the right way to do it. I get a code (1) on every dist-upgrade for some time now..maybe two weeks, can't remember but if I run: apt-get -f install apt-get goes on to setup the packages it downloaded. If the dist-upgrade message says it it going to remove a lot of packages I run instead: apt-get -u upgrade I continue this command until a dist-upgrade returns to sanity. -- CK -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/carbhnf8q2...@mid.individual.net
Re: Error code 1...........
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 18:33:30 -0400 Patrick Wiseman sent: On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Charlie aries...@ipstarmail.com.au wrote: From my keyboard: Debian Jessie on laptop. Probably nothing but: The following packages will be upgraded: libjpeg-progs 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 100 not upgraded. 40 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0 B/82.1 kB of archives. After this operation, 162 kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y (Reading database ... 140431 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../libjpeg-progs_1%3a9a-2_amd64.deb ... Unpacking libjpeg-progs (1:9a-2) over (1:1.3.1-3) ... dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/libjpeg-progs_1%3a9a-2_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man1/djpeg.1.gz', which is also in package libjpeg-turbo-progs 1:1.3.1-3 Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.0.2-1) ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libjpeg-progs_1%3a9a-2_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) When I encountered this error (which was mentioned on this list a few days ago) I purged the linjpeg-turbo-progs package (on which apparently nothing depended because it went without complaint) and then resumed my upgrade; the error went away. But maybe that's not the right way to do it. Patrick Thanks Patrick, That package is just dross so I purged it from the system. Charlie -- Registered Linux User:- 329524 *** The philosopher asks himself, What is your aim in philosophy? and he answers, To show the fly the way out of the bottle. And where is he when he has made his escape? He is, it appears, exactly where he started; for philosophy leaves everything as it is. --Ludwig Wittgenstein *** Debian GNU/Linux - just the best way to create magic - -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141021202740.21cfc000@taogypsy
Error code 1...........
From my keyboard: Debian Jessie on laptop. Probably nothing but: The following packages will be upgraded: libjpeg-progs 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 100 not upgraded. 40 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0 B/82.1 kB of archives. After this operation, 162 kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y (Reading database ... 140431 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../libjpeg-progs_1%3a9a-2_amd64.deb ... Unpacking libjpeg-progs (1:9a-2) over (1:1.3.1-3) ... dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/libjpeg-progs_1%3a9a-2_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man1/djpeg.1.gz', which is also in package libjpeg-turbo-progs 1:1.3.1-3 Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.0.2-1) ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libjpeg-progs_1%3a9a-2_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- Registered Linux User:- 329524 *** Just because I accept you as you are does not mean that I have given up all hope of your improvement. Ashleigh Brilliant *** Debian GNU/Linux - just the best way to create magic - -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141021092047.2d9fbe9c@taogypsy
Re: Error code 1...........
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Charlie aries...@ipstarmail.com.au wrote: From my keyboard: Debian Jessie on laptop. Probably nothing but: The following packages will be upgraded: libjpeg-progs 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 100 not upgraded. 40 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0 B/82.1 kB of archives. After this operation, 162 kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y (Reading database ... 140431 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../libjpeg-progs_1%3a9a-2_amd64.deb ... Unpacking libjpeg-progs (1:9a-2) over (1:1.3.1-3) ... dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/libjpeg-progs_1%3a9a-2_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man1/djpeg.1.gz', which is also in package libjpeg-turbo-progs 1:1.3.1-3 Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.0.2-1) ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libjpeg-progs_1%3a9a-2_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) When I encountered this error (which was mentioned on this list a few days ago) I purged the linjpeg-turbo-progs package (on which apparently nothing depended because it went without complaint) and then resumed my upgrade; the error went away. But maybe that's not the right way to do it. Patrick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cajvvksosay6ggxs9-ckcdnakcukj3dqt6gjenwhcc9cc-ms...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Sub-Process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
El Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:38:26 -0300, Horacio escribió: Horacio, por favor, evita el formato html en los mensajes que mandes a la lista. Gracias. Holas, en un hosting que me permite instalar un server debian al actualizar por apt-get update / upgrade no me permite actualizar el kernel... el error que me da con dpkg --configure --pending que es el mismo apt-get -f install me dan estos errores... (...) Searching for default file ... Generating /boot/grub/default file and setting the default boot entry to 0 entry not specified. run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-update-grub exited with return code 1 Failed to process /etc/kernel/postinst.d at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-2.6.32-5-686.postinst line 799. dpkg: error al procesar linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 (--configure): el subproceso instalado el script post-installation devolvió el código de salida de error 1 configured to not write apport reports (...) Se encontraron errores al procesar: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-686 E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Alguna idea? Los dos errores parecen tener el mismo origen por lo que entiendo que corrigiendo uno el otro irá detrás. Me escama ese setting the default boot entry to 0 entry not specified generado por el script zz-update-grub. A ver qué encuentra Google... ah, mira, revisa este bug aunque es para GRUB Legacy :-? update-grub failure http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560417 Saludos, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/kgl57s$s7f$2...@ger.gmane.org
Re: E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Sven Joachim wrote: Exactly. FWIW, I kind of expected that, it's a rather common error when installing linux-image packages because - they are rather large and dump everything into the root partition - old versions are not automatically deleted by apt/aptitude. Also note that during the package upgrades you need to have enough free space for both the old and the new version of the package. Which partition I should free up? I mean, so that I can install new linux-image package. Here's my df -h # df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/hda1 259M 207M 38M 85% / tmpfs 253M 0 253M 0% /lib/init/rw udev 10M 96K 10M 1% /dev tmpfs 253M 0 253M 0% /dev/shm /dev/hda9 9.4G 150M 8.8G 2% /home /dev/hda8 373M 11M 343M 3% /tmp /dev/hda5 4.6G 541M 3.9G 13% /usr /dev/hda6 2.8G 771M 1.9G 29% /var - -- Zaki Akhmad -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: http://getfiregpg.org iEYEARECAAYFAklRDJ4ACgkQT4k8JfIMt5f4JACgqJNlTTr+0DJ/R6b/b4t52zDH huIAniu3bxxiDN5jEHB3bavryQ7Rvu50 =b9hz -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
On 2008-12-23 17:07 +0100, Zaki Akhmad wrote: On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Sven Joachim wrote: Exactly. FWIW, I kind of expected that, it's a rather common error when installing linux-image packages because - they are rather large and dump everything into the root partition - old versions are not automatically deleted by apt/aptitude. Also note that during the package upgrades you need to have enough free space for both the old and the new version of the package. Which partition I should free up? I mean, so that I can install new linux-image package. The root partition, i.e. the one mounted on /. Here's my df -h # df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/hda1 259M 207M 38M 85% / Here is your problem, official linux-image-* packages do not fit into that space: , | % aptitude show linux-image-2.6.26-1-686 | grep Size: | Uncompressed Size: 59.5M ` In the short run you can free space by removing old kernels, but if you plan to have more than two kernels installed concurrently, you probably have to bite the bullet and repartition. tmpfs 253M 0 253M 0% /lib/init/rw udev 10M 96K 10M 1% /dev tmpfs 253M 0 253M 0% /dev/shm /dev/hda9 9.4G 150M 8.8G 2% /home /dev/hda8 373M 11M 343M 3% /tmp /dev/hda5 4.6G 541M 3.9G 13% /usr /dev/hda6 2.8G 771M 1.9G 29% /var Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Sven Joachim wrote: If you still have your terminal open, send the complete output of the apt-get upgrade run. Otherwise, try apt-get upgrade again. Here's the full version: # apt-get upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be upgraded: acpid apache2 apache2-mpm-prefork apache2-utils apache2.2-common apt-utils aptitude dselect e2fslibs libblkid1 libcairo2 libgnutls26 libgpm2 libncursesw5 libss2 libuuid1 libxml2 linux-image-2.6-686 linux-image-2.6.26-1-686 locales net-tools openssh-client openssh-server perl-doc ssh ucf 26 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 9 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B/42.1MB of archives. After this operation, 3052kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Y Preconfiguring packages ... Setting up libcomerr2 (1.41.3-1) ... (Reading database ... 27219 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace linux-image-2.6.26-1-686 2.6.26-8 (using .../linux-image-2.6.26-1-686_2.6.26-12_i386.deb) ... The directory /lib/modules/2.6.26-1-686 still exists. Continuing as directed. Done. Unpacking replacement linux-image-2.6.26-1-686 ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-2.6.26-1-686_2.6.26-12_i386.deb (--unpack): failed in buffer_write(fd) (10, ret=-1): backend dpkg-deb during `./lib/modules/2.6.26-1-686/kernel/net/irda/irda.ko': No space left on device dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Running postrm hook script /sbin/update-grub. Searching for GRUB installation directory ... found: /boot/grub Searching for default file ... found: /boot/grub/default Testing for an existing GRUB menu.lst file ... found: /boot/grub/menu.lst Searching for splash image ... none found, skipping ... Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.26-1-686 Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.25-2-686 Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-4-686 Updating /boot/grub/menu.lst ... done Preparing to replace e2fslibs 1.41.2-1 (using .../e2fslibs_1.41.3-1_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement e2fslibs ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-2.6.26-1-686_2.6.26-12_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) - -- Zaki Akhmad -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: http://getfiregpg.org iEYEARECAAYFAklPSX8ACgkQT4k8JfIMt5fUuwCffrSZxeWWgtIX1DCHczoVNACR CUcAnjs0fcul4XEszKLL8v9FgDWAB3jC =23qx -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
Zaki Akhmad wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Sven Joachim wrote: If you still have your terminal open, send the complete output of the apt-get upgrade run. Otherwise, try apt-get upgrade again. Here's the full version: # apt-get upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be upgraded: acpid apache2 apache2-mpm-prefork apache2-utils apache2.2-common apt-utils aptitude dselect e2fslibs libblkid1 libcairo2 libgnutls26 libgpm2 libncursesw5 libss2 libuuid1 libxml2 linux-image-2.6-686 linux-image-2.6.26-1-686 locales net-tools openssh-client openssh-server perl-doc ssh ucf 26 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 9 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B/42.1MB of archives. After this operation, 3052kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Y Preconfiguring packages ... Setting up libcomerr2 (1.41.3-1) ... (Reading database ... 27219 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace linux-image-2.6.26-1-686 2.6.26-8 (using .../linux-image-2.6.26-1-686_2.6.26-12_i386.deb) ... The directory /lib/modules/2.6.26-1-686 still exists. Continuing as directed. Done. Unpacking replacement linux-image-2.6.26-1-686 ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-2.6.26-1-686_2.6.26-12_i386.deb (--unpack): failed in buffer_write(fd) (10, ret=-1): backend dpkg-deb during `./lib/modules/2.6.26-1-686/kernel/net/irda/irda.ko': No space left on device dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Running postrm hook script /sbin/update-grub. Searching for GRUB installation directory ... found: /boot/grub Searching for default file ... found: /boot/grub/default Testing for an existing GRUB menu.lst file ... found: /boot/grub/menu.lst Searching for splash image ... none found, skipping ... Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.26-1-686 Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.25-2-686 Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-4-686 Updating /boot/grub/menu.lst ... done Preparing to replace e2fslibs 1.41.2-1 (using .../e2fslibs_1.41.3-1_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement e2fslibs ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-2.6.26-1-686_2.6.26-12_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Looks like you're out of space: failed in buffer_write(fd) (10, ret=-1): backend dpkg-deb during `./lib/modules/2.6.26-1-686/kernel/net/irda/irda.ko': No space left on device -- SENILE.COM found... Out Of Memory. 02:05:01 up 5 days, 1:42, 1 user, load average: 1.87, 1.26, 0.67 Linux Registered User #241685 http://counter.li.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
On 2008-12-22 09:08 +0100, M.Lewis wrote: Looks like you're out of space: failed in buffer_write(fd) (10, ret=-1): backend dpkg-deb during `./lib/modules/2.6.26-1-686/kernel/net/irda/irda.ko': No space left on device Exactly. FWIW, I kind of expected that, it's a rather common error when installing linux-image packages because - they are rather large and dump everything into the root partition - old versions are not automatically deleted by apt/aptitude. Also note that during the package upgrades you need to have enough free space for both the old and the new version of the package. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I met this error while trying to upgrade with # apt-get upgrade ... ... ... Testing for an existing GRUB menu.lst file ... found: /boot/grub/menu.lst Searching for splash image ... none found, skipping ... Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.26-1-686 Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.25-2-686 Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-4-686 Updating /boot/grub/menu.lst ... done Preparing to replace libcomerr2 1.41.2-1 (using .../libcomerr2_1.41.3-1_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libcomerr2 ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-2.6.26-1-686_2.6.26-12_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Someone could give me a hint? I can't find error on /var/log/syslog - -- Zaki Akhmad -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: http://getfiregpg.org iEYEARECAAYFAklPDVkACgkQT4k8JfIMt5fQ+ACdGunu1fgQzcmR89csIdUSEyhr uM0An2PY0Mk70JrvdlbkfJY+YFWs8LQ4 =wISd -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
On 2008-12-22 04:45 +0100, Zaki Akhmad wrote: I met this error while trying to upgrade with # apt-get upgrade ... Somewhere here there should be the error message. ... ... Testing for an existing GRUB menu.lst file ... found: /boot/grub/menu.lst Searching for splash image ... none found, skipping ... Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.26-1-686 Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.25-2-686 Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-4-686 Updating /boot/grub/menu.lst ... done Preparing to replace libcomerr2 1.41.2-1 (using .../libcomerr2_1.41.3-1_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libcomerr2 ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-2.6.26-1-686_2.6.26-12_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Someone could give me a hint? I can't find error on /var/log/syslog If you still have your terminal open, send the complete output of the apt-get upgrade run. Otherwise, try apt-get upgrade again. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Wie behebe ich den Error Code (1) bei apt-get dist-upgrade?
Am Samstag, 4. November 2006 22:15 schrieb Rüdiger Noack: Stefan Frech schrieb: Hast du Plattenplatzprobleme? /dev/hda3 250M 250M 0 100% / sieht nicht danach aus Nicht? Wie würdest du das (s.o.) denn nennen? Flüchtigkeitsfehler - oder nach müd kommt doof Da ein erweitern der Partion wohl nicht in Frage kommt, wäre zu überlegen was man in / alles löschen könnte ( und dass man bei der nächsten Installation eine Partition /boot groß genug anlegt. Rückenschmerzenhabende Grüße Stefan pgpvC7V0Eh42A.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Wie behebe ich den Error Code (1) bei apt-get dist-upgrade?
Am Sonntag, 5. November 2006 17:49 schrieb David Haller: Hallo, Am Sam, 04 Nov 2006, Stefan Frech schrieb: P.S. gibt es ein How-To wie ich meinen geliebten Pinguin auf eine größere Festplatte migieren kann? http://de.opensuse.org/SDB:SuSE_Linux_umkopieren Danke werde ich mir am Wochenende zu gemühte führen Grüße Stefan
Re: Wie behebe ich den Error Code (1) bei apt-get dist-upgrade?
Am Montag, 6. November 2006 21:10 schrieb Stefan Frech: Am Samstag, 4. November 2006 22:15 schrieb Rüdiger Noack: Stefan Frech schrieb: Hast du Plattenplatzprobleme? /dev/hda3 250M 250M 0 100% / sieht nicht danach aus Nicht? Wie würdest du das (s.o.) denn nennen? Flüchtigkeitsfehler - oder nach müd kommt doof Da ein erweitern der Partion wohl nicht in Frage kommt, wäre zu überlegen was man in / alles löschen könnte ( und dass man bei der nächsten Installation eine Partition /boot groß genug anlegt. Rückenschmerzenhabende Grüße Stefan Hallo, hab jetzt alles was nach Kernel2.6.16-vserver aussieht in /boot gelöscht und apt-get dist-upgrade ausgeführt - jezt schein alles wieder in Ordnung Grüße Stefan pgpYCyr8lhClf.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Wie behebe ich den Error Code (1) bei apt-get dist-upgrade?
Hallo, Am Sam, 04 Nov 2006, Stefan Frech schrieb: P.S. gibt es ein How-To wie ich meinen geliebten Pinguin auf eine größere Festplatte migieren kann? http://de.opensuse.org/SDB:SuSE_Linux_umkopieren -dnh -- Speed doesn't kill... Impact does. -- David Wilcox -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Wie behebe ich den Error Code (1) bei apt-get dist-upgrade?
Hallo, wollte heute mal wieder mein Sarge auf den neusten Stand bringen tatooine:/home/skf# apt-get dist-upgrade Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut... Fertig Berechne Upgrade...Fertig 0 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 0 nicht aktualisiert. 2 nicht vollständig installiert oder entfernt. Es müssen 0B Archive geholt werden. Nach dem Auspacken werden 0B Plattenplatz zusätzlich benutzt. Möchten Sie fortfahren? [J/n] J Richte libdevmapper1.01 ein (1.01.00-4) ... Creating device-mapper devices...done. ldconfig: Writing of cache data failed dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von libdevmapper1.01 (--configure): Unterprozess post-installation script gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück dpkg: Abhängigkeitsprobleme verhindern Konfiguration von lilo: lilo hängt ab von libdevmapper1.01; aber: Paket libdevmapper1.01 bereitstellt, ist noch nicht konfiguriert. dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von lilo (--configure): Abhängigkeitsprobleme - lasse es unkonfiguriert Fehler traten auf beim Bearbeiten von: libdevmapper1.01 lilo E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) tatooine:/home/skf# Wie kann ich das reparieren? Müde Grüße aus Gönningen Stefan pgpskfMkiwWDe.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Wie behebe ich den Error Code (1) bei apt-get dist-upgrade?
Stefan Frech schrieb: Wie kann ich das reparieren? Hast du Plattenplatzprobleme? Rüdiger -- -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: Wie behebe ich den Error Code (1) bei apt-get dist-upgrade?
Am Samstag, 4. November 2006 21:22 schrieb Rüdiger Noack: Stefan Frech schrieb: Wie kann ich das reparieren? Hast du Plattenplatzprobleme? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ df -h Dateisystem Größe Benut Verf Ben% Eingehängt auf /dev/hda3 250M 250M 0 100% / tmpfs 380M 0 380M 0% /dev/shm /dev/hda124,7G 3,6G 953M 80% /home /dev/hda11361M 8,1M 334M 3% /tmp /dev/hda8 4,6G 2,1G 2,3G 48% /usr /dev/hda9 2,4G 635M 1,6G 28% /var /dev/hda6 4,7G 384M 4,1G 9% /opt /dev/hda7 5,0G 843M 3,9G 18% /home/skf/Backup tmpfs 10M 2,8M 7,3M 28% /dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sieht nicht danach aus - ehm hab vergessen dass ich den kernel 2.6.16-vserver-k7 sowie kernel 2.6.16-k7 ausversehen installiert habe und danach das Problem auftrat Grüße Stefan P.S. gibt es ein How-To wie ich meinen geliebten Pinguin auf eine größere Festplatte migieren kann? pgpzozCqoXwJh.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Wie behebe ich den Error Code (1) bei apt-get dist-upgrade?
Stefan Frech schrieb: Hast du Plattenplatzprobleme? /dev/hda3 250M 250M 0 100% / sieht nicht danach aus Nicht? Wie würdest du das (s.o.) denn nennen? Rüdiger -- -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: Wie behebe ich den Error Code (1) bei apt-get dist-upgrade?
On Sat, 4 Nov 2006, Stefan Frech stated: Am Samstag, 4. November 2006 21:22 schrieb Rüdiger Noack: Stefan Frech schrieb: Wie kann ich das reparieren? Hast du Plattenplatzprobleme? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ df -h Dateisystem Größe Benut Verf Ben% Eingehängt auf /dev/hda3 250M 250M 0 100% / ^ sieht nicht danach aus Eher doch. - ehm hab vergessen dass ich den kernel 2.6.16-vserver-k7 sowie kernel 2.6.16-k7 ausversehen installiert habe und danach das Problem auftrat Nach dem zweiten installierten Kernel war dein / wohl voll, was dann für das Problem sorgte. P.S. gibt es ein How-To wie ich meinen geliebten Pinguin auf eine größere Festplatte migieren kann? IIRC Disk-Upgrading HowTo oder so ähnlich. bye Gerhard pgpZVkhPwE2HO.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Wie behebe ich den Error Code (1) bei apt-get dist-upgrade?
Am Samstag, 4. November 2006 22:04 schrieb Stefan Frech: Am Samstag, 4. November 2006 21:22 schrieb Rüdiger Noack: Stefan Frech schrieb: Wie kann ich das reparieren? Hast du Plattenplatzprobleme? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ df -h Dateisystem Größe Benut Verf Ben% Eingehängt auf /dev/hda3 250M 250M 0 100% / tmpfs 380M 0 380M 0% /dev/shm /dev/hda124,7G 3,6G 953M 80% /home /dev/hda11361M 8,1M 334M 3% /tmp /dev/hda8 4,6G 2,1G 2,3G 48% /usr /dev/hda9 2,4G 635M 1,6G 28% /var /dev/hda6 4,7G 384M 4,1G 9% /opt /dev/hda7 5,0G 843M 3,9G 18% /home/skf/Backup tmpfs 10M 2,8M 7,3M 28% /dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sieht nicht danach aus - ehm hab vergessen dass ich den kernel sieht doch danach aus dein / ist voll 2.6.16-vserver-k7 sowie kernel 2.6.16-k7 ausversehen installiert habe und danach das Problem auftrat Grüße Stefan P.S. gibt es ein How-To wie ich meinen geliebten Pinguin auf eine größere Festplatte migieren kann? Gruß Alex
Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
xvfb zlib1g 241 mis à jour, 0 nouvellement installés, 0 à enlever et 70 non mis à jour. Il est nécessaire de prendre 77,7Mo/161Mo dans les archives. Après dépaquetage, 10,4Mo d'espace disque seront libérés. Souhaitez-vous continuer [O/n] ? je passe les messages de réception des paquets . 77,7Mo réceptionnés en 20m6s (64,4ko/s) Extraction des modèles depuis les paquets : 100% Préconfiguration des paquets... (Lecture de la base de données... 93327 fichiers et répertoires déjà installés.)Préparation du remplacement de zlib1g 1:1.2.3-9 (en utilisant .../zlib1g_1%3a1.2.3-11_i386.deb) ... Dépaquetage de la mise à jour de zlib1g ... Paramétrage de zlib1g (1.2.3-11) ... (Lecture de la base de données... 93327 fichiers et répertoires déjà installés.)Préparation du remplacement de file 4.15-2 (en utilisant .../archives/file_4.17-1_i386.deb) ... Dépaquetage de la mise à jour de file ... Préparation du remplacement de libmagic1 4.15-2 (en utilisant .../libmagic1_4.17-1_i386.deb) ... Dépaquetage de la mise à jour de libmagic1 ... Préparation du remplacement de dpkg 1.13.16 (en utilisant .../archives/dpkg_1.13.17_i386.deb) ... Dépaquetage de la mise à jour de dpkg ... dpkg : erreur de traitement de /var/cache/apt/archives/dpkg_1.13.17_i386.deb (--unpack) : tentative de remplacement de « /usr/share/man/fr/man8 », qui appartient aussi au paquet base-passwd dpkg-deb: sous-processus paste tué par le signal (Relais brisé (pipe)) Des erreurs ont été rencontrées pendant l'exécution : /var/cache/apt/archives/dpkg_1.13.17_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) J'ai googlisé mais je n'ai rien trouvé qui me paraisse pertinent. Si quelqu'un a une bonne idée je suis preneur d'avance merci Jean-Louis Giraud -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Vous pouvez aussi ajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
Le Samstag 15 April 2006 16:56, Jean-Louis Giraud a écrit : bonjour, depuis quelques temps lorsque je lance apt-get update puis upgrade j'obtiens systématiquement le message cité en objet à la fin du processus d'upgrade. ... dpkg : erreur de traitement de /var/cache/apt/archives/dpkg_1.13.17_i386.deb (--unpack) : tentative de remplacement de « /usr/share/man/fr/man8 », qui appartient aussi au paquet base-passwd dpkg-deb: sous-processus paste tué par le signal (Relais brisé (pipe)) Des erreurs ont été rencontrées pendant l'exécution : /var/cache/apt/archives/dpkg_1.13.17_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) /usr/share/man/fr/man8 existe déjà dans une autre packetage et tu peux le remplacer par dpkg --force-overwrite /var/cache/apt/archives/dpkg_1.13.17_i386.deb mais je mesure pas les risques que ça peut comporter. Je l'ai déjà fait pls fois dans ce cas de figure et je n'ai jamais eu de problème Klaus
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
Merhaba.E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)bu hatayla daha evvel karsilasip giderebilen biri bana da yardimci olursa sevinirim.google'da aratinca bircok forum sayfasi cikiyo fakat sorunu giderecek pek ciddi bi cevapla karsilasamadim henuz. yardimci olursaniz sevinirim.Iyi aksamlar.
Re: E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
9 Dec 2005 tarihinde Mehmet Fatih AKBULUT dedi ki: Merhaba. E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) bu hatayla daha evvel karsilasip giderebilen biri bana da yardimci olursa sevinirim. google'da aratinca bircok forum sayfasi cikiyo fakat sorunu giderecek pek ciddi bi cevapla karsilasamadim henuz. yardimci olursaniz sevinirim. Iyi aksamlar. Merhaba, bu hata size fazla bir bilgi vermiyor. yani apt arayuzunuzun de olaydan bir haberi yok, tek bildigi dpkg'nin hata verdigi. neyseki dpkg'nin verdigi hata ustlerde bir yerlerde yaziyordur. ciktinin tamamini gonderirseniz yorum yapmak daha kolay olur kolay gelsin -aab --- Bu alana reklam veremeyebilirsiniz! http://www.bayazit.net/alphan/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sub-process gzip returned an error code (1)
When doing # aptitude update on my bog standard testing setup, I'm getting the following error: Get:8 http://http.us.debian.org testing/contrib Packages [49.0kB] 99% [8 Packages gzip 0] [7 Packages 0] gzip: stdin: not in gzip format Err http://http.us.debian.org testing/contrib Packages Sub-process gzip returned an error code (1) The full log is shown below [1]. Plus sources.list [2] I've googled and found nothing conclusive. Any ideas why this is failing? Is anyone else seeing the same thing -- Best, Marc [1] mote:~# aptitude update Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Ign cdrom://[Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 r0a _Sarge_ - Official i386 Binary-2 (20050607)] unstable Release.gpg Ign cdrom://[Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 r0a _Sarge_ - Official i386 Binary-1 (20050607)] unstable Release.gpg Ign cdrom://[Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 r0a _Sarge_ - Official i386 Binary-2 (20050607)] unstable Release Ign cdrom://[Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 r0a _Sarge_ - Official i386 Binary-1 (20050607)] unstable Release Get:1 http://secure-testing.debian.net etch/security-updates Release.gpg [189B] Get:2 http://security.debian.org stable/updates Release.gpg [189B] Get:3 http://http.us.debian.org stable Release.gpg [197B] Get:4 http://http.us.debian.org testing Release.gpg [189B] Hit http://secure-testing.debian.net etch/security-updates Release Hit http://security.debian.org stable/updates Release Get:5 ftp://ftp.nerim.net sarge Release.gpg [189B] Hit http://http.us.debian.org stable Release Hit http://secure-testing.debian.net etch/security-updates/main Packages Ign http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Packages Hit http://http.us.debian.org testing Release Hit http://secure-testing.debian.net etch/security-updates/contrib Packages Hit http://secure-testing.debian.net etch/security-updates/non-free Packages Ign http://security.debian.org stable/updates/contrib Packages Ign http://security.debian.org stable/updates/non-free Packages Get:6 http://ftp.debian-unofficial.org sarge Release.gpg [189B] Ign http://http.us.debian.org stable/main Packages Ign http://http.us.debian.org stable/contrib Packages Ign http://http.us.debian.org stable/non-free Packages Hit http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Packages Hit http://ftp.debian-unofficial.org sarge Release Hit http://http.us.debian.org testing/main Packages Ign http://http.us.debian.org testing/contrib Packages Hit http://http.us.debian.org testing/non-free Packages Hit http://security.debian.org stable/updates/contrib Packages Hit http://ftp.debian-unofficial.org sarge/main Packages Hit ftp://ftp.nerim.net sarge Release Ign ftp://ftp.nerim.net sarge Release Hit http://http.us.debian.org stable/main Packages Hit http://http.us.debian.org stable/contrib Packages Hit http://security.debian.org stable/updates/non-free Packages Hit http://ftp.debian-unofficial.org sarge/contrib Packages Hit http://ftp.debian-unofficial.org sarge/non-free Packages Hit http://ftp.debian-unofficial.org sarge/restricted Packages Hit http://http.us.debian.org stable/non-free Packages Get:7 ftp://ftp.nerim.net sarge/main Packages Get:8 http://http.us.debian.org testing/contrib Packages [49.0kB] 99% [8 Packages gzip 0] [7 Packages 0] gzip: stdin: not in gzip format Err http://http.us.debian.org testing/contrib Packages Sub-process gzip returned an error code (1) Ign ftp://ftp.nerim.net sarge/main Packages Hit ftp://ftp.nerim.net sarge/main Packages Fetched 195B in 5s (36B/s) Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done [2] deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 r0a _Sarge_ - Official i386 Binary-2 (20050607)]/ unstable contrib main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 r0a _Sarge_ - Official i386 Binary-1 (20050607)]/ unstable contrib main deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ stable main contrib non-free deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib non-free deb http://secure-testing.debian.net/debian-secure-testing etch/security-updates main contrib non-free # mplayer, acroread, LAME, etc. deb ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian-marillat/ sarge main # www.debian-unofficial.org e.g. JRE deb http://ftp.debian-unofficial.org/debian sarge main contrib non-free restricted -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
Thanks for the advice Adam. Everything was fine after waiting a couple of days. openoffice.org-mimelnk_1.1.2-4_all.deb didn't cause any errors then. Thanks. /KS ___ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
[KS] wrote: Can anyone figure out what should be done to get rid of error given when unpacking openoffice.org-mimelnk_1.1.2-4_all.deb? Ignore it until the bug (reported twice - #265852 #269040) gets fixed. It won't interfere with the install of other packages. Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
: /var/cache/apt/archives/openoffice.org-mimelnk_1.1.2-4_all.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) 02:10:28:~# ** Thanks, /KS ___ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dpkg error code (1)
I looked through the archives and saw this a coupla times, but didnt see any real answers. I have an unmet dependency (libopenldap-runtime), but that doesnt look to be the problem. When called from apt-get dpkg is giving me Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1). full screenshot is below. I saw a thread that pointed to this bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no\bug=129807 but, how do I install the ncurses upgrade if my installer, dpkg, isnt working?!?!? sorry if this is dumb, Im a noob to debian. thx for the help, Baroof heres the whole thing: # apt-get -f install Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Correcting dependencies... Done The following extra packages will be installed: libopenldap-runtime The following NEW packages will be installed: libopenldap-runtime 0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 1 packages not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B/26.3kB of archives. After unpacking 119kB will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y (Reading database ... 6538 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libopenldap-runtime (from .../libopenldap-runtime_1%3a1.2.12-1_all.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libopenldap-runtime_1%3a1.2.12-1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man5/ldapsearchprefs.conf.5.gz', which is also in package libldap2 Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libopenldap-runtime_1%3a1.2.12-1_all.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) #
Re: dpkg error code (1)
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 03:37:35 -0800, Baroof Pender wrote: but, how do I install the ncurses upgrade if my installer, dpkg, isn't working?!?!? dpkg is working fine. It is refusing to install a package that overwrites files that already belong to another package, without explicitly being told that it is ok in this case. Unpacking libopenldap-runtime (from .../ libopenldap-runtime_1%3a1.2.12-1_all.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/ libopenldap-runtime_1%3a1.2.12-1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man5/ldapsearchprefs.conf.5.gz', which is also in package libldap2 Do dpkg --force-overwrite -i /var/cache/apt/archives/libopenldap-runtime_1%3a1.2.12-1_all.deb and you should be fine. HTH, Ray -- ART A friend of mine in Tulsa, Okla., when I was about eleven years old. I'd be interested to hear from him. There are so many pseudos around taking his name in vain. - The Hipcrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan
RE: dpkg error code (1)
Yay! It worked! Thx, baroof -Original Message- From: J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:54 AM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: dpkg error code (1) On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 03:37:35 -0800, Baroof Pender wrote: but, how do I install the ncurses upgrade if my installer, dpkg, isn't working?!?!? dpkg is working fine. It is refusing to install a package that overwrites files that already belong to another package, without explicitly being told that it is ok in this case. Unpacking libopenldap-runtime (from .../ libopenldap-runtime_1%3a1.2.12-1_all.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/ libopenldap-runtime_1%3a1.2.12-1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man5/ldapsearchprefs.conf.5.gz', which is also in package libldap2 Do dpkg --force-overwrite -i /var/cache/apt/archives/libopenldap-runtime_1%3a1.2.12-1_all.deb and you should be fine. HTH, Ray -- ART A friend of mine in Tulsa, Okla., when I was about eleven years old. I'd be interested to hear from him. There are so many pseudos around taking his name in vain. - The Hipcrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: dpkg error code (1)
Baroof Pender wrote: I looked through the archives and saw this a coupla times, but didn't see any real answers. I have an unmet dependency (libopenldap-runtime), but that doesn't look to be the problem. When called from apt-get dpkg is giving me Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1). full screenshot is below. Try forcing dpkg to install the package by passing the --force-overwrite parameter. Or: A quick and dirty hack would be to extract the contents of the Debian package you are trying to install, as well as its control files, via dpkg-deb. Then edit the control files or remove the file that causes the problem. Then repack the Debian package. Given that you do it right, it would install. As I said, it's quick and dirty, though. --paolo Paolo Falcone __ www.edsamail.com
