Re: Odd messages booting Cubox-i4 Pro "imx-gpc 20dc000.gpc: failed to get pu regulator: -517" and "ERROR: could not get clock /usdhc1_pwrseq:ext_clock(0)"
Hello, There seems to be a good explanation here, https://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2013/12/msg00038.html Regards On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Rick Thomas <rbtho...@pobox.com> wrote: > Does anyone know what the error messages > > Does anybody know what is causing the subject error messages? > > It almost looks like the DTB is claiming a couple of devices that don't > exist on this hardware... But I don't understand enough of that process to > be sure. > > Anybody got some clues? > > I've attached the first several lines of the boot log, up-to and including > the error messages, in hopes that they may have some information about the > hardware. > > Thanks! > Rick > > > U-Boot 2015.10+dfsg1-3 (Nov 24 2015 - 22:14:29 +) > > > > CPU: Freescale i.MX6Q rev1.5 996 MHz (running at 792 MHz) > > CPU: Extended Commercial temperature grade (-20C to 105C) at 29C > > Reset cause: WDOG > > Board: MX6 Cubox-i > > DRAM: 2 GiB > > MMC: FSL_SDHC: 0 > > No panel detected: default to HDMI > > Display: HDMI (1024x768) > > In:serial > > Out: serial > > Err: serial > > Net: FEC > > Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0 > > switch to partitions #0, OK > > mmc0 is current device > > Scanning mmc 0:1... > > Found U-Boot script /boot.scr > > 1474 bytes read in 32 ms (44.9 KiB/s) > > ## Executing script at 1200 > > 3415976 bytes read in 371 ms (8.8 MiB/s) > > 33984 bytes read in 98 ms (337.9 KiB/s) > > 17496691 bytes read in 1231 ms (13.6 MiB/s) > > Booting Debian 4.3.0-1-armmp from mmc 0:1... > > Kernel image @ 0x1200 [ 0x00 - 0x341fa8 ] > > ## Flattened Device Tree blob at 1800 > >Booting using the fdt blob at 0x1800 > >Using Device Tree in place at 1800, end 1800b4bf > > > > Starting kernel ... > > > > [0.098389] imx-gpc 20dc000.gpc: failed to get pu regulator: -517 > > > > [1.485042] imx-sdma 20ec000.sdma: firmware: failed to load > imx/sdma/sdma-imx6q.bin (-2) > > [1.544474] imx-gpc 20dc000.gpc: failed to get pu regulator: -517 > > [1.551844] imx-gpc 20dc000.gpc: failed to get pu regulator: -517 > > Loading, please wait... > > [2.221380] imx-gpc 20dc000.gpc: failed to get pu regulator: -517 > > [2.257486] ERROR: could not get clock /usdhc1_pwrseq:ext_clock(0) > > > > -- “Science is a differential equation. Religion is a boundary condition.” Alan Turing
Re: Odd messages booting Cubox-i4 Pro "imx-gpc 20dc000.gpc: failed to get pu regulator: -517" and "ERROR: could not get clock /usdhc1_pwrseq:ext_clock(0)"
> On 04.02.2016, at 14:04, Nigel Sollars <nsoll...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There seems to be a good explanation here, > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2013/12/msg00038.html > >> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Rick Thomas <rbtho...@pobox.com> wrote: >> Does anyone know what the error messages >> >> Does anybody know what is causing the subject error messages? >> ... >> > [0.098389] imx-gpc 20dc000.gpc: failed to get pu regulator: -517 Personally, I'm more worried about this, >> > >> > [1.485042] imx-sdma 20ec000.sdma: firmware: failed to load >> > imx/sdma/sdma-imx6q.bin (-2) Then this.
Odd messages booting Cubox-i4 Pro "imx-gpc 20dc000.gpc: failed to get pu regulator: -517" and "ERROR: could not get clock /usdhc1_pwrseq:ext_clock(0)"
Does anyone know what the error messages Does anybody know what is causing the subject error messages? It almost looks like the DTB is claiming a couple of devices that don't exist on this hardware... But I don't understand enough of that process to be sure. Anybody got some clues? I've attached the first several lines of the boot log, up-to and including the error messages, in hopes that they may have some information about the hardware. Thanks! Rick > U-Boot 2015.10+dfsg1-3 (Nov 24 2015 - 22:14:29 +) > > CPU: Freescale i.MX6Q rev1.5 996 MHz (running at 792 MHz) > CPU: Extended Commercial temperature grade (-20C to 105C) at 29C > Reset cause: WDOG > Board: MX6 Cubox-i > DRAM: 2 GiB > MMC: FSL_SDHC: 0 > No panel detected: default to HDMI > Display: HDMI (1024x768) > In:serial > Out: serial > Err: serial > Net: FEC > Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0 > switch to partitions #0, OK > mmc0 is current device > Scanning mmc 0:1... > Found U-Boot script /boot.scr > 1474 bytes read in 32 ms (44.9 KiB/s) > ## Executing script at 1200 > 3415976 bytes read in 371 ms (8.8 MiB/s) > 33984 bytes read in 98 ms (337.9 KiB/s) > 17496691 bytes read in 1231 ms (13.6 MiB/s) > Booting Debian 4.3.0-1-armmp from mmc 0:1... > Kernel image @ 0x1200 [ 0x00 - 0x341fa8 ] > ## Flattened Device Tree blob at 1800 >Booting using the fdt blob at 0x1800 >Using Device Tree in place at 1800, end 1800b4bf > > Starting kernel ... > > [0.098389] imx-gpc 20dc000.gpc: failed to get pu regulator: -517 > > [1.485042] imx-sdma 20ec000.sdma: firmware: failed to load > imx/sdma/sdma-imx6q.bin (-2) > [1.544474] imx-gpc 20dc000.gpc: failed to get pu regulator: -517 > [ 1.551844] imx-gpc 20dc000.gpc: failed to get pu regulator: -517 > Loading, please wait... > [2.221380] imx-gpc 20dc000.gpc: failed to get pu regulator: -517 > [2.257486] ERROR: could not get clock /usdhc1_pwrseq:ext_clock(0) >
Utilisation gpc (GNU pascal)
Bonjour , J'ai installe gbu pascal ,mais lorsque je lance la compilation ,voila qu'est ce qui se passe : FSLunix gpc a.pas -o exe ld: fatal : bibliothÞque -lgcc : introuvable ld: fatal : bibliothÞque -lgcc : introuvable ld: fatal : Erreurs dans le traitement des fichiers. Aucun rÚsultat n'a ÚtÚ Úcr it dans exe collect2: ld returned 1 exit status J'ai installe meme Libgcc mais le meme pb, Aide-moi svp . Ce Message est envoye par le serveur de messagerie de l'universite de Tlemcen -- Pensez à lire la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Pensez à rajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cygwin + gpc + gcc
eu sei que isso não tem muito haver com o escopo da listamas alguém já tentou usar o cygwin com o gcc ou o gpc? -- Att, /---\ | .''`. | E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | : :' : | Programador | Giant Cargo | | `. `'` | UIN #38352716 | Debian User #347922 | | `-| Tel.: (11) 5581-0113 r.152 | \---/
Re: cygwin + gpc + gcc
existe uma lista só pra cygwin procura no yahoo groups []'s Diogo Leal --- Eduardo Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: eu sei que isso não tem muito haver com o escopo da listamas alguém já tentou usar o cygwin com o gcc ou o gpc? -- Att, /---\ | .''`. | E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | : :' : | Programador | Giant Cargo | | `. `'` | UIN #38352716 | Debian User #347922 | | `-| Tel.: (11) 5581-0113 r.152 | \---/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Yahoo! Mail - O melhor e-mail do Brasil! Abra sua conta agora: http://br.yahoo.com/info/mail.html
erro no gpc
Pessoal, Eu reinstalei o debian, tudo funciona normalmente, mas o compilador para pascal não roda (gpc). Eu lembro que eu instalei antes, um pacote responsável pelo cabeçalho para fazer ele rodar, mas não lembro o nome. Alguém sabe qual é o nome do pacote? segue o erro: /usr/bin/ld: cannot open crt1.o: No such file or directory collect2: ld returned 1 exit status -- Att, /---\ | .''`. | E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | : :' : | Programador | Giant Cargo | | `. `'` | UIN #38352716 | Debian User #347922 | | `-| Tel.: (11) 5581-0113 r.152 | \---/
OOo não encontra GPC
Estou tentando instalar o OpenOffice mas ao executar o ./configure ele gera a mensagem de erro dizendo que o GPC não foi encontrado!!! pelo apt-cache search gpc eu descobri que este é um compilador Pascal... então eu o intalei, mas o erro continua!!! alguem pode me ajudar??? valeuzz
gpc - cannot execute binary file
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/pascal$ cat pierwszy.pas
program pierwszy;
begin
writeln('To jest test kompilatora gpc pod linuxem');
readln;
end.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/pascal$ gpc -c pierwszy.pas -o pierwszy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/pascal$ chmod 700 pierwszy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/pascal$ ./pierwszy
bash: ./pierwszy: cannot execute binary file
miał ktoś taki problem?
--
Radek 'Warden' Antoniuk
http://debian.black.pl || GG:260746 || #debian.pl #lgul
Re: gpc - cannot execute binary file
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 01:17:03PM +0100, Radosław Antoniuk wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/pascal$ cat pierwszy.pas
program pierwszy;
begin
writeln('To jest test kompilatora gpc pod linuxem');
readln;
end.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/pascal$ gpc -c pierwszy.pas -o pierwszy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/pascal$ chmod 700 pierwszy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/pascal$ ./pierwszy
bash: ./pierwszy: cannot execute binary file
miał ktoś taki problem?
noexec na /home ?
--
--w
Re: gpc - cannot execute binary file
On Monday 09 December 2002 13:21, Wojtek Piecek wrote: noexec na /home ? nope. wtedy było permission denied ;-) -- Radek 'Warden' Antoniuk http://debian.black.pl || GG:260746 || #debian.pl #lgul
Re: Re: gpc - cannot execute binary file
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 01:26:24PM +0100, Radosław Antoniuk wrote: On Monday 09 December 2002 13:21, Wojtek Piecek wrote: noexec na /home ? nope. wtedy było permission denied ;-) Moze, nie mam, wiec tylko zgaduje ;-) -- --w
Re: gpc - cannot execute binary file
On Monday 09 December 2002 14:36, Misiek wrote: A dlaczego nei skorzystasz z free pascal compilera? http://freepascal.org A dlatego że mam debiana a paczkowany jest gpc (zresztą bardziej uniwersalny) więc dlaczego mam kombinować z kompilacją innych kompilatorów ? A działa na pewno, (bo musi) tylko ja czegoś nie wiem ;-) -- Radek 'Warden' Antoniuk http://debian.black.pl || GG:260746 || #debian.pl #lgul
Re: gpc - cannot execute binary file
A dlatego że mam debiana a paczkowany jest gpc (zresztą bardziej uniwersalny) więc dlaczego mam kombinować z kompilacją innych kompilatorów ? A działa na pewno, (bo musi) tylko ja czegoś nie wiem ;-) co ty nie powiesz? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache search free pascal fp-compiler - Free Pascal Compiler fp-docs - Free Pascal Documentation fp-units-base - Free Pascal base units fp-units-db - Free Pascal units for some database libraries fp-units-fcl - Free Pascal Free Component Library fp-units-gfx - Free Pascal units for some graphics libraries fp-units-gtk - Free Pascal units for GTK 1.2.x fp-units-misc - Free Pascal miscellaneous units fp-units-net - Free Pascal units for networking fp-units-rtl - Free Pascal Runtime Library fp-utils - Free Pascal Utils -- Mati ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sounds like a Windows problem, try calling Microsoft support
Re: gpc - cannot execute binary file
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Radosław Antoniuk wrote: On Monday 09 December 2002 14:36, Misiek wrote: A dlaczego nei skorzystasz z free pascal compilera? http://freepascal.org A dlatego że mam debiana a paczkowany jest gpc (zresztą bardziej uniwersalny) więc dlaczego mam kombinować z kompilacją innych kompilatorów ? A działa na pewno, (bo musi) tylko ja czegoś nie wiem ;-) Free Pascal Compiler jest dostępny w paczkach również. Nie ma żadnych problemów z kompilowaniem. Sam instalowałem z paczek. Większość ludzi używa teraz FPC, bo nie jest zły i zgodny z większością kompilatorów. Paczka nazywa się 'fp-compiler'. Są również dostępne dodatkowe biblioteki. -- huan
Re: gpc - cannot execute binary file
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 01:17:03PM +0100, Radosław Antoniuk wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/pascal$ cat pierwszy.pas
program pierwszy;
begin
writeln('To jest test kompilatora gpc pod linuxem');
readln;
end.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/pascal$ gpc -c pierwszy.pas -o pierwszy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/pascal$ chmod 700 pierwszy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/pascal$ ./pierwszy
bash: ./pierwszy: cannot execute binary file
miał ktoś taki problem?
[ Pascala już dawno nie używałem, ale postanowiłem spróbować co
[ namieszałeś :-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get install gpc
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Starting
Starting 2
Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
gpc-2.95
The following NEW packages will be installed:
gpc gpc-2.95
[...]
Rozpakowanie gpc (z .../gpc_2%3a2.95.4-17_i386.deb) ...
Konfigurowanie gpc (2.95.4-17) ...
Konfigurowanie gpc-2.95 (2.95.4-15) ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat a.pas
program pierwszy;
begin
writeln('To jest test kompilatora gpc pod linuxem');
readln;
end.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gpc -c a.pas -o a
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ chmod +x a
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./a
bash: ./a: cannot execute binary file
[hmmm...]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ file a
a: ELF 32-bit LSB relocatable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), not stripped
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ file /bin/ls
/bin/ls: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for
GNU/Linux 2.2.0, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped
[HM!!! (relocatable != executable)]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gpc a.pas -o a
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./a
To jest test kompilatora gpc pod linuxem
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
[ :-) ]
No i po co było kombinować z flagami kompilatora?
Marcin
--
Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://marcin.owsiany.pl/
GnuPG: 1024D/60F41216 FE67 DA2D 0ACA FC5E 3F75 D6F6 3A0D 8AA0 60F4 1216
Re: gpc - cannot execute binary file
On Monday 09 December 2002 16:47, Marcin Owsiany wrote: [ :-) ] No i po co było kombinować z flagami kompilatora? argv... No tak. żeby to było to to bym się nigdy nie domyślił. Thanks ;-) -- Radek 'Warden' Antoniuk http://debian.black.pl || GG:260746 || #debian.pl #lgul
RE: gcc conflicts with gcc-doc, gpc conflicts with gpc-doc
Serafim Zanikolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why does gcc-2.95 conflicts with gcc-doc? They don't share any common files ... The same applies to gpc and gpc-doc (which i've installed using ``dpkg -i --force-things conflicts gpc-doc''). --snip-- I had the same problem on my DEC Alpha about 10 days ago. You can see the thread entitled Compiler in testing dated around 16 Dec 2001 on the Debian-Alpha Mailing list if you want the gory details. If I let the system (apt-get upgrade and/or dselect) do what it wanted to do, it would remove gcc-2.96-4 from my system! This is NOT what I wanted g. I don't know about the gpc-doc problem, but I would suspect it's conflict is similar. In my case the gcc-doc program was suggested by BOTH the obsolete task-c-dev and task-devel-common meta-packages. Both of these packages only suggested the gcc-doc package, but it was enough to overide the presence of gcc-2.95-4 on my system and force its removal. Anyway, when I removed BOTH the task-c-dev and task-devel-common meta-packages, things returned to normal. The bottom line is that the info in gcc-doc has been moved into the gcc version-specific doc file and you no longer need it (gcc-doc) on your system if you have the version-specific doc file installed. You also have to remove any obsolete task packages that might call for it. I had to do some sleuthing around to discover this. Cheers, -Don Spoon-
Re: gcc conflicts with gcc-doc, gpc conflicts with gpc-doc
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 04:59:31PM +0200, Serafim Zanikolas wrote: Why does gcc-2.95 conflicts with gcc-doc? They don't share any common files ... Try gcc-2.95-doc instead. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: gcc conflicts with gcc-doc, gpc conflicts with gpc-doc
Thanks to all of you! You were most informative :) --- Serafim Zanikolas http://www.it.teithe.gr/~serzan [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gcc conflicts with gcc-doc, gpc conflicts with gpc-doc
Hello dear debian fellows! Why does gcc-2.95 conflicts with gcc-doc? They don't share any common files ... The same applies to gpc and gpc-doc (which i've installed using ``dpkg -i --force-things conflicts gpc-doc''). morfeas:~# apt-get -s install gcc-doc Reading Package Lists... Building Dependency Tree... The following packages will be REMOVED: anjuta g++ g++-2.95 gcc gcc-2.95 gpc gpc-2.95 libltdl0-dev libstdc++2.10-dev libtool The following NEW packages will be installed: gcc-doc The following held packages will be changed: anjuta 0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 10 to remove and 10 not upgraded. Remv anjuta (0.1.8-1 Debian:testing) Remv g++ (2:2.95.4-9 Debian:testing) [g++-2.95 ] Remv g++-2.95 (1:2.95.4-0.011006 Debian:testing) [libstdc++2.10-dev ] Remv libstdc++2.10-dev (1:2.95.4-0.011006 Debian:testing) Remv libltdl0-dev (1.3.5-5 ) Remv libtool (1.4.2-3 Debian:testing) Remv gpc-2.95 (1:2.95.4-0.011006 Debian:testing) [gpc ] Remv gpc (2:2.95.4-9 Debian:testing) Remv gcc (2:2.95.4-9 Debian:testing) [gcc-2.95 ] Remv gcc-2.95 (1:2.95.4-0.011006 Debian:testing) Inst gcc-doc (1:2.95.2-20 Debian:testing) Conf gcc-doc (1:2.95.2-20 Debian:testing) TIA! -- Serafim Zanikolas Proud of running http://www.it.teithe.gr/~serzan Debian GNU/Linux
Re: gcc conflicts with gcc-doc, gpc conflicts with gpc-doc
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 04:59:31PM +0200, Serafim Zanikolas wrote: |Hello dear debian fellows! | |Why does gcc-2.95 conflicts with gcc-doc? It is the specific versions that conflict. The packaging was reorganized somewhat, but I don't remeber the details for those packages. -D -- the nice thing about windoze is - it does not just crash, it displays a dialog box and lets you press 'ok' first.
Re: gpc linking problem
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, 19 Feb 1998, Deniz Dogan wrote: $gpc hello.pas -o hello ld: cannot open -lgpc: No such file or directory Add a symbolic link: ln -s /usr/lib/libgpc.so.2.8 \ /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/2.7.2.1/libgpc.so Tobias -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
gpc linking problem
Hi, I installed GNU Pascal Compiler(gpc) and the Runtime Libraries (libgpc2) from bo. (gpc_2.0-3.deb and libgpc2_2.0-3.deb) And the other packages gpc depends on already installed (libc5, gcc (= 2.7.2.1-2), gcc ( 2.7.2.2)). When I try to compile a test program from /usr/doc/gpc/examples/test (I also installed gpc-doc package) getting this error: $gpc hello.pas -o hello ld: cannot open -lgpc: No such file or directory How can I avoid this problem? Thanks. -- Deniz Dogan -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
GPC
Richard Davies writes: This is a request for some feedback from current and potential users of GPC. I have GPC 2.0 compiled for hamm, built using GCC 2.7.2.3. The next version of GPC (currently 971001) is in beta, but is already more stable than GPC 2.0. There seems to be a few possibilities available. I could package GPC 2.0, GPC 971001 beta, both versions, or wait until GPC 971001 beta is released as GPC 2.1. Let me know your preferences, if any, within the next few of days and I will then decide which course of action to take. I'd say package 2.1 beta, into unstable and 2.0 as stable. Then update the beta package when GPC get's released. I have a few pascal programs, that would be nice to compile on Linux and I'd want to use 2.1 as it is more complete than 2.0. -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Re: GPC
This is a request for some feedback from current and potential users of GPC. I have GPC 2.0 compiled for hamm, built using GCC 2.7.2.3. The next version of GPC (currently 971001) is in beta, but is already more stable than GPC 2.0. There seems to be a few possibilities available. I could package GPC 2.0, GPC 971001 beta, both versions, or wait until GPC 971001 beta is released as GPC 2.1. Let me know your preferences, if any, within the next few of days and I will then decide which course of action to take. I'd say package 2.1 beta, into unstable and 2.0 as stable. Then update the beta package when GPC get's released. I have a few pascal programs, that would be nice to compile on Linux and I'd want to use 2.1 as it is more complete than 2.0. Upload the beta version into experimental. Brian ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) --- Management should work for the engineers, not the other way around. -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
GPC
This is a request for some feedback from current and potential users of GPC. I have GPC 2.0 compiled for hamm, built using GCC 2.7.2.3. The next version of GPC (currently 971001) is in beta, but is already more stable than GPC 2.0. There seems to be a few possibilities available. I could package GPC 2.0, GPC 971001 beta, both versions, or wait until GPC 971001 beta is released as GPC 2.1. Let me know your preferences, if any, within the next few of days and I will then decide which course of action to take. Richard -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
gpc-problem
gpc won't compile any programs on my debian-System. I have installed gpc, gpc-doc and libgpc2. The Version No. of all three debian-packages is 2.0-3 . I always get the same error-message: ld: cannot open -lgpc: No such file or directory I also tried to compile some of the files in the examples- directory. I always get this message. I think what ld needs here is the libgpc.so.2.8 (?) file and tried several -l and -L options, but ld won't find anything that I specify this way (similar error message). Compiling C-programs is no problem, so ld should work. Can please anyone tell me what I am doing wrong? Thanks, Tobias Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Re: gpc-problem
From: Tobias Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpc won't compile any programs on my debian-System. I have installed gpc, gpc-doc and libgpc2. The Version No. of all three debian-packages is 2.0-3 . This is a well-known problem, bug of libgpc2 package. To fix, try ln -sf libgpc.so.2.8 /usr/include/libgpc.so -- Hayao Nakahara [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Remove gpc gpc-doc isite libgpc2 pash adbbs
I have given up trying to find a maintainer for the packages listed. -- Forwarded message -- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 16:19:45 -0800 From: Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ftp.debian.org: Orphan gpc gpc-doc isite libgpc2 pash adbbs Package: ftp.debian.org Version: N/A Please remove the listed packages to the orphaned directory. I am no longer using the packages at all and attempts to get other maintainers have failed again and again. -- System Information Debian Release: 1.3 Kernel Version: Linux cyrix200 2.1.60 #20 Mon Oct 27 18:11:52 PST 1997 i486 unknown -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
problem with gpc
dear all,
i trying to use gpc to test my programs as i write them for a
programming class i am taking. anyways, i tried to compile my first
dinky little program and i get this error:
ld: cannot open -lgpc: No such file or directory
i am sure that it is not a problem in the program because it compiles
under gpc on another linux system (non-debian) and it compiles on our
campus VMS. it also looks to me to be a more system related problem.
what's up? (please help me!)
confused,
paul j. thompson
p.s. for good measure, here's the program:
PROGRAM LAB3 (INPUT,OUTPUT);
(* Paul J. Thompson*)
(* September 9, 1997 *)
(* CS2113 *)
(* Lab Section 1 *)
CONST
PRICE = 3;
VAR
ITEMS,
TOTALITEMS,
COST : INTEGER;
BEGIN
TOTALITEMS := 0;
WHILE NOT EOF DO
BEGIN
READLN(ITEMS);
TOTALITEMS := TOTALITEMS + ITEMS;
COST := ITEMS * PRICE;
WRITELN(ITEMS:3,' ITEMS COST $',COST:3);
END;
WRITELN;
WRITELN('TOTAL ITEMS SOLD = ',TOTALITEMS:3);
END.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Re: problem with gpc
Ok. Last call for a maintainer for gpc. Almost a year ago someone else
took it over and nothing was done. I am going to remove the package since
it will be included in future egcs releases anyways if no one is willing
to maintain the package.
The fix for the bug is described in the bug archives for the package.
On Wed, 10 Sep 1997, Paul J. Thompson wrote:
dear all,
i trying to use gpc to test my programs as i write them for a
programming class i am taking. anyways, i tried to compile my first
dinky little program and i get this error:
ld: cannot open -lgpc: No such file or directory
i am sure that it is not a problem in the program because it compiles
under gpc on another linux system (non-debian) and it compiles on our
campus VMS. it also looks to me to be a more system related problem.
what's up? (please help me!)
confused,
paul j. thompson
p.s. for good measure, here's the program:
PROGRAM LAB3 (INPUT,OUTPUT);
(* Paul J. Thompson*)
(* September 9, 1997 *)
(* CS2113 *)
(* Lab Section 1 *)
CONST
PRICE = 3;
VAR
ITEMS,
TOTALITEMS,
COST : INTEGER;
BEGIN
TOTALITEMS := 0;
WHILE NOT EOF DO
BEGIN
READLN(ITEMS);
TOTALITEMS := TOTALITEMS + ITEMS;
COST := ITEMS * PRICE;
WRITELN(ITEMS:3,' ITEMS COST $',COST:3);
END;
WRITELN;
WRITELN('TOTAL ITEMS SOLD = ',TOTALITEMS:3);
END.
--- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ ---
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Re: about the gpc package
Look at the bug reports for the gpc package on www.debian.org for a fix . The one who took over the package has vanished appearantly. Anyone volunteering to maintain the package? On Tue, 19 Aug 1997, nik w wrote: I am unable to compile schtuff with gpc, namely: godg# pwd /usr/doc/gpc/examples/contrib godg# gpc screen.p ld: cannot open -lgpc: No such file or directory i _do_ have libgpc2 installed: godg# dpkg -L libgpc2 /. /usr /usr/lib /usr/lib/libgpc.so.2.8 /usr/lib/libgpc.so.2 would i be wrong in expecting to see a libgpc.a somewhere? thanks, nik w. --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
gpc problems
I'm having problems with gpc. ld complains that it cant find -lgpc. I was told that I may be missing a symlink. I checked and found that libgpc.so.2 is linked to libgpc.so.2.8. I thought something must have been screwed up somewhere along the line so I removed gpc, libgpc2, and gpcdoc. I reinstalled and got the following output: Mail/ gpc-doc_2.0-3.deb mail/ test.pas News/ gpc_2.0-3.deb rc2.d/ Packages libgpc2_2.0-3.deb rc6.d/ debian:~# dpkg -i *.deb Selecting previously deselected package gpc-doc. (Reading database ... 91419 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking gpc-doc (from gpc-doc_2.0-3.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package gpc. Unpacking gpc (from gpc_2.0-3.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libgpc2. Unpacking libgpc2 (from libgpc2_2.0-3.deb) ... Setting up gpc-doc (2.0-3) ... Setting up libgpc2 (2.0-3) ... ldconfig: warning: can't open /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so (No such file or directory), skipping ldconfig: warning: can't open /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so (No such file or directory), skipping Setting up gpc (2.0-3) ... debian:~# What have I missed installing to cause these errors. I checked all the dependencies in the packages file and all checked out. I did recently install libc6. Could this cause a problem with the libc5 requirement? Thanks in advance. -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
[Help] gpc (Pascal) Problems.
Hi == I have instaled the gpc (GNU Pascal Compiler) with libgpc2 and all seems ok, dpkg does not report any problem, but... When I try to compile a program the message all I can get is: bash$ gpc teste.pas ld: cannot open -lgpc: No such file or directory bash$ What is the problem? I have installed libgpc2 ... What is the solution? Thanks -- At\'e breve === Pedro Quaresma de Almeida Departamento de Matem\'atica Faculdade de Ci\^encias e Tecnologia Universidade de Coimbra P-3000 COIMBRA, PORTUGAL e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] url: http://www.mat.uc.pt/~pedro/
