large HD partition plan

2008-06-23 Thread gary turner
After 8 years on my PIIIs w/10Gb HDs, I've bought a Core2 duo w/320GB HD 
and 4GB mem.  I will install Lenny AMD64.


Usage will will be primarily web development using multiple browsers, 
Emacs, GIMP, Inkscape  and ImageMagick.  I also plan to run Vista Home 
Premium in a VM (probably VirtualBox).  I suspect that large swap and 
temp partitions will be helpful, as I tend to leave my apps up and 
running.  Space is needed for mirroring 3 or 4 web sites at a time; may 
be in /home/* or /var/www/


LAN servers, Apache, mail and MySQL will remain on the PIIIs.

All the HOWTOs, etc. that I've found talk about 2-10GB HDs, which were 
helpful in 2000 when I first installed Debian.  I find them less so when 
looking at so much more space.


I will appreciate any and all suggestions for a partition plan, 
especially those where a rationale for the plan is included.


cheers,

gary
--
Anyone can make a usable web site. It takes a graphic
designer to make it slow, confusing and painful to use.
begin:vcard
fn:Gary Turner
n:Turner;Gary
org:Gary Turner, Web Developer
adr:;;USA
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Czar
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://gtwebdev.com/
version:2.1
end:vcard



Re: large HD partition plan

2008-06-23 Thread Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
gary turner wrote:
 After 8 years on my PIIIs w/10Gb HDs, I've bought a Core2 duo w/320GB
 HD and 4GB mem.  I will install Lenny AMD64.

 Usage will will be primarily web development using multiple browsers,
 Emacs, GIMP, Inkscape  and ImageMagick.  I also plan to run Vista Home
 Premium in a VM (probably VirtualBox).  I suspect that large swap and
 temp partitions will be helpful, as I tend to leave my apps up and
 running.  Space is needed for mirroring 3 or 4 web sites at a time;
 may be in /home/* or /var/www/

 LAN servers, Apache, mail and MySQL will remain on the PIIIs.

 All the HOWTOs, etc. that I've found talk about 2-10GB HDs, which were
 helpful in 2000 when I first installed Debian.  I find them less so
 when looking at so much more space.

 I will appreciate any and all suggestions for a partition plan,
 especially those where a rationale for the plan is included.

Even in the old time, I don't think partition plans were much good, it
depends a lot on the planned use.

You can use LVM, this way you can change the partitioning relatively
easily if you need more space in a specific partition.

-- 
Don't lose
Your head
To gain a minute
You need your head
Your brains are in it.
-- Burma Shave

Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://move.to/hpkb


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: large HD partition plan

2008-06-23 Thread Jochen Schulz
gary turner:
 
 Usage will will be primarily web development using multiple browsers,  
 Emacs, GIMP, Inkscape  and ImageMagick.  I also plan to run Vista Home  
 Premium in a VM (probably VirtualBox).  I suspect that large swap and  
 temp partitions will be helpful, as I tend to leave my apps up and  
 running.

With 4GB RAM you probably don't need much swap. If your machine
starts swapping notoriously, things will get ridiculously slow anyway.

I have a machine with 4GB RAM myself and I never managed to use all of
it. I am not running VMs, though.

 All the HOWTOs, etc. that I've found talk about 2-10GB HDs, which were  
 helpful in 2000 when I first installed Debian.  I find them less so when  
 looking at so much more space.

Use 10-20GB for the regular system, 1-2GB for swap and mount the rest on
/srv with subdirectories for VMs, mirrors etc. A separate /home might be
a good idea as well.

I have /srv/files, /srv/svn, /srv/www, /srv/pgsql etc. And I put /tmp on
a tmpfs.

J.
-- 
Atrocities committed in Rwanda pervade my mind when I am discussing
mundanities with acquaintances.
[Agree]   [Disagree]
 http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Storing whole sarge disto on a HD partition?

2005-09-30 Thread Scott Fitzgerald
I'm a dial up user who purchased sarge on a 14 cd set.

I'm buying a laptop and was wondering, is there a faq or howto anyplace on
copying the whole distribution to a partition on a HD?  It would be great
to be away from home, and if a package is recommended to me to just be able
to log into root and run apt-get while on the road.
---
Scotty


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Storing whole sarge disto on a HD partition?

2005-09-30 Thread nullman
 I'm a dial up user who purchased sarge on a 14 cd set.

 I'm buying a laptop and was wondering, is there a faq or howto anyplace on
 copying the whole distribution to a partition on a HD?  It would be great
 to be away from home, and if a package is recommended to me to just be able
 to log into root and run apt-get while on the road.

Just mirror the repository  (rsync would probably be the way of
choice) somewhere on your filesystem and point apt.conf to that place.

Probably you could just copy the files from the CDs instead of mirroring, too.
The apt-conf-settings for the cd is also just a pointer to a filesystem-location

Or if you have connection to a broadband-access sometime :

http://www.debian.org/mirror/ftpmirror



Re: Storing whole sarge disto on a HD partition?

2005-09-30 Thread Nelson Castillo
  I'm buying a laptop and was wondering, is there a faq or howto anyplace on
  copying the whole distribution to a partition on a HD?  It would be great
  to be away from home, and if a package is recommended to me to just be able
  to log into root and run apt-get while on the road.

 Just mirror the repository  (rsync would probably be the way of
 choice) somewhere on your filesystem and point apt.conf to that place.

I did that once. I copied the isos to the HD, mounted
them with -o loop, then I put a symlink to each one
in /var/www, and then put an entry for each one of
them in sources.list, and I could use apt to install
from them.

You need to install a web server for that.
Maybe another method exists, this one is simple
enough.

Regards.

--
Homepage : http://geocities.com/arhuaco

The first principle is that you must not fool yourself
and you are the easiest person to fool.
 -- Richard Feynman.



Re: Storing whole sarge disto on a HD partition?

2005-09-30 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom

Scott Fitzgerald wrote:

I'm a dial up user who purchased sarge on a 14 cd set.

I'm buying a laptop and was wondering, is there a faq or howto anyplace on
copying the whole distribution to a partition on a HD?  It would be great
to be away from home, and if a package is recommended to me to just be able
to log into root and run apt-get while on the road.


I do that.
1. use mkisofs to create an iso file for each of the 14 cd's
2. mount xxx.iso -r -t iso9660 -o loop /mnt/Debian3.1/CD1
...

Note you have to create sufficient loop devices to mount all 14:
rmmod loop
modprobe loop max_loop=14
C=8; for C in `seq 8 14`; do mknod /dev/loop$C b 7 $C; done

It really is not necessary to mount all 14: I have only gotten to need 
10 CD's. I have 9 mounted and I run synaptic on that.


Adjust your sourcelist:
deb file:/mnt/Debian3.1/CD1/debian sarge main contrib
...

run apt-get update

Makes installing anything a breeze: use it all the time.
In fact I still run off 14 CD's I bought when Sarge was still testing. 
Where I live they won't deliver the 14 CD's.


HTH
H


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Storing whole sarge disto on a HD partition?

2005-09-30 Thread Jeff D

Scott Fitzgerald wrote:

I'm a dial up user who purchased sarge on a 14 cd set.

I'm buying a laptop and was wondering, is there a faq or howto anyplace on
copying the whole distribution to a partition on a HD?  It would be great
to be away from home, and if a package is recommended to me to just be able
to log into root and run apt-get while on the road.
---
Scotty




You might want to check out apt-move.  Theres a nice discussion about 
doing the exact same thing here:

http://www.debianplanet.org/node.php?id=698

basically you can make a repository from the cds to your local hd, 
providing you have enough space for it.


hth,
jeff


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Major problem with boot disk and reading HD partition

2003-01-16 Thread Kevin Smith
Hi All,

I've kinda buggered up my install of Linux, anyhow, I booted my ram disk
from my floppy disks.  However, when I mount a Linux partition of my HD
install I cannot read the contents of any of the directories what gives?

Is there no way to read and manipulate the contents on the hard drive?

Thanks,

Kevin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: FW: HD Partition

1999-06-11 Thread Brad
On Thu, 10 Jun 1999, J Horacio MG wrote:

 Make `df /usr', `df /home', `df /var',... in your current installation,

Did you mean 'du -s' instead of 'df'? df will only tell you how much the
entire partition is using, sort of useless unless you're simply resizing
partitions without changing the file system layout. 'du -s' will tell you
how much space the named director(y|ies) use(s).


Re: FW: HD Partition

1999-06-11 Thread J Horacio MG
Brad dixit:
~ On Thu, 10 Jun 1999, J Horacio MG wrote:
~ 
~  Make `df /usr', `df /home', `df /var',... in your current installation,
~ 
~ Did you mean 'du -s' instead of 'df'? df will only tell you how much the
~ entire partition is using, sort of useless unless you're simply resizing
~ partitions without changing the file system layout. 'du -s' will tell you
~ how much space the named director(y|ies) use(s).

Well, since I already have my filesystem scattered into different
partitions, `df' is useful.  But yes, I should have said `du /dir' (for
every directory we want to keep in a separate partition) for someone whose
system is all in one partition.

Shame `du' won't give any percentages at all.

Regards
-- 
Horacio
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Valencia - ESPAÑA


Re: FW: HD Partition

1999-06-11 Thread Brad
On Fri, 11 Jun 1999, J Horacio MG wrote:

 Well, since I already have my filesystem scattered into different
 partitions, `df' is useful.  But yes, I should have said `du /dir' (for
 every directory we want to keep in a separate partition) for someone whose
 system is all in one partition.

du -sh or du -ch are more useful than raw du. The -x option can be helpful
in some cases as well.

 Shame `du' won't give any percentages at all.

If you want percentage of the entire partition, grab a calculator and
divide by the size of the partition. If you want percentage of the amount
used by the system, grab a calculator and divide by the total space
used.


HD Partition

1999-06-10 Thread Patrick Dahiroc
hi all

i have an 8.4GB hard drive and i would like some suggestion as to how to
divide it.  how much space should i devote to each directory and which
ones should be real partitions and which should be logical?
/usr = 
/home =
/etc =
/tmp =
/root =
/var = 
am i missing other important directories?
the machine would have a maximum of three different users.
i also have 64MB of RAM do i still need to make a swap partition?

please cc my email address since i'm not in the user list.

TYA
pd


Re: HD Partition

1999-06-10 Thread Brad
On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, Patrick Dahiroc wrote:

 i have an 8.4GB hard drive and i would like some suggestion as to how to
 divide it.  how much space should i devote to each directory and which
 ones should be real partitions and which should be logical?

I've just been asking this question in the past few days (except i'm using
a 4G HD), check the archives for more information.

Partitioning drives is almost an art form, it's hard to know exactly how
much each section is going to need.

First, we'll start with the most important directory you forgot: /
/ should contain /bin, /sbin, /lib, /boot, /dev, /etc, and possibly /root.
All these directories are needed to actually start the computer, they
can't easily be mounted from another partition.

These are also pretty small. 100M should be more than enough, as long as
you put the various programs where they're supposed to be. (Debian
packages do this automatically)

   /usr = 

This will probably be the biggest, unless you store a lot of pictures,
mp3s, or other large datafiles in /home. you could even consider splitting
/usr/local onto a second partition, depending on what exactly your plans
are.

   /home =

3 users... it depends on how much you plan to store for each user.
Pictures and such add up quickly!

   /tmp =

Not really sure on this one. However, it's insecure to mount /tmp from
another partition unless unauthorized people have no access to the
console.

   /var = 

If you get a lot of mail, or gather a lot of usenet news, then this needs
to be big. Otherwise, 500M will be enough for most cases (i think).

 am i missing other important directories?

Remember that you can also create other directories. For example, if you
wanted to store mp3 music, you might put that on a separate partition just
to keep it out of the way. The whole 8.4G doesn't have to go towards
system directories.

You could even leave some of the drive unpartitioned, to be used later
when you find a use for it.

 i also have 64MB of RAM do i still need to make a swap partition?

i'd recommend it.


Finally, note that some of the numbers i've given could easily be wrong
for your needs. Feel free to change them as you see fit.


FW: HD Partition

1999-06-10 Thread J Horacio MG
Make `df /usr', `df /home', `df /var',... in your current installation,
and that will give you an idea of the percentage space you need for each
one.  For directories which include others, like /, you can do `df'
and substract the rest.

The dir /root should remain in /, no need to make a separate
partition.  The same goes for /etc.

Here goes my partition table with a disk free command:

h0rus:~$ df
Filesystem 1024-blocks  Used Available Capacity Mounted on
/dev/hda3  77764   1355460194 18%   /
/dev/hda51088223  295307   736691 29%   /usr
/dev/hda6 295474  137781   142433 49%   /usr/doc
/dev/hda7 295474   56408   223806 20%   /usr/X11R6
/dev/hda8 349910   27323   304516  8%   /home
/dev/hda9 194405  10029384073 54%   /home/alt
/dev/hda10691980 512   655725  0%   /usr/local
/dev/hda11272145   24120   233970  9%   /var
/dev/hdc12198060 108   187724  0%   /tmp
/dev/hdc10991000  116928   822879 12%   /opt

Notice that the percentages are used space.  /home/alt is a directory
which I created to keep varios things.  /opt is used to install big
(huge) programs not from the distribution.  /usr/local is for programs
not from the distro.  I gave some space to /tmp so that I could
uncompress big-big files in it temporarily, so it will be empty most of
the time;  you can make /var/tmp a symlink to /tmp.

The first, second, and third partitions are native, you'll have to
create extended partitions from the fourth partition.

As for the swap partition, yes, you do need one.  I've got two, a 128MB
and a 64MB.

Regards

-- 
Horacio
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Valencia - ESPAÑA


Installation from Win95-Fat32 HD partition?

1998-09-16 Thread Jan Krupa

It is possible to install debian2.0 from Win95 (Fat32) HD partition?
If so, could someone explain how to do it?
I have not found information in The 

Can I after having installed the base system from 5 floppies
just on the other console 'mount -t vfat /dev/hda1 /win95' ?

Which module  have I to install from the base system to 
be able to mount Win95-Fat32 partition ?

Thanks in advance

Jan Krupa