Re: Package list problem

2007-09-14 Thread Daniel Santos

Andrei :

I ran that command on terminal.app and on the resulting packages onward 
and every one is not installed. It reverse depends on gnustep (virtual 
package), which reverse depends on gnustep-games and gnustep-devel, that 
don't rdepend on nothing.


Mumia :

I used aptitude instead of synaptic and the error message was that the 
gnustep-back-0.11 that terminal.app depends on is not available, and that is
the reason why it can't be installed. Synaptic told me what I've written 
on the

previous email.

I ran those searches and no output resulted. The packages are not installed.

Pardon my ignorance, but I usually upgrade packages without paying attention
to the distribution they fit in. My system is currently a lenny/sid. How 
do I go
about bringing it to a single distribution (the latest unstable is the 
preferred)?


Daniel Santos



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Package list problem

2007-09-14 Thread Mumia W..

On 09/14/2007 07:02 AM, Daniel Santos wrote:

Andrei :

I ran that command on terminal.app and on the resulting packages onward 
and every one is not installed. It reverse depends on gnustep (virtual 
package), which reverse depends on gnustep-games and gnustep-devel, that 
don't rdepend on nothing.


Mumia :

I used aptitude instead of synaptic and the error message was that the 
gnustep-back-0.11 that terminal.app depends on is not available, and 
that is 
the reason why it can't be installed. Synaptic told me what I've written 
on the 
previous email.


I ran those searches and no output resulted. The packages are not 
installed.


Pardon my ignorance, but I usually upgrade packages without paying  
attention 
to the distribution they fit in. My system is currently a lenny/sid. How 
do I go 
about bringing it to a single distribution (the latest unstable is the 
preferred)?


Daniel Santos





Make sure your /etc/apt/sources.list only has unstable sources in it.

Then do aptitude update

In aptitude ncurses interface, you can find out what packages don't 
belong in unstable by going into the Obsolete and Locally Created 
Packages section. Another option is to run aptitude search 
'~i!~Astable' . Don't uninstall everything you find using those 
methods. They just speed up the research of finding out what to remove.


After you've removed any packages that clearly block your upgrade to 
Sid, you can do the traditional distribution upgrade procedure:


aptitude upgrade
aptitude dist-upgrade

This page describes the old upgrade procedure using apt-get: 
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ch-woody.en.html


You'll probably want to use aptitude instead, but the ideas are the 
same. After you've upgraded to Sid, you'll probably want to reinstall 
some of the Lenny programs that had to be removed during the upgrade. 
Good luck.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Package list problem

2007-09-13 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 12:46:42PM +0100, Daniel Santos wrote:
 Hello,

 I am running dpkg version 1.14.4.

 I've had several repositories configured, and kept changing them for some
 time because I had internet access problems. Anyway, the package list shows
 a lot of uninstalled packages with no description information (don't know 
 if
 dpkg-query -l behaves this way or if its garbage from older repositories)

 When I tried to apt-get a package I got the following output :

Did you try to 'apt-get update' first?

Regards,
Andrei
-- 
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Package list problem

2007-09-13 Thread Daniel Santos

Yes.

In my last message I don't know if it was clear but I meant that the package
which was to be installed (terminal.app) is on the package list because
I have some other packages that depend on it. Since the repository that
had that package is no longer in my list, it remains there because some
other package depends on it. Probably it is hiding the same package on
one of the repositories configured.

Is there some documentation on the package list format and how can I 
search it

for the packages that keep the phantom package in the list ?

Daniel Santos

Andrei Popescu wrote:

On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 12:46:42PM +0100, Daniel Santos wrote:
  

Hello,

I am running dpkg version 1.14.4.

I've had several repositories configured, and kept changing them for some
time because I had internet access problems. Anyway, the package list shows
a lot of uninstalled packages with no description information (don't know 
if

dpkg-query -l behaves this way or if its garbage from older repositories)

When I tried to apt-get a package I got the following output :



Did you try to 'apt-get update' first?

Regards,
Andrei
  



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Package list problem

2007-09-13 Thread Mumia W..

On 09/12/2007 06:46 AM, Daniel Santos wrote:

Hello,

I am running dpkg version 1.14.4.

I've had several repositories configured, and kept changing them for some
time because I had internet access problems. Anyway, the package list shows
a lot of uninstalled packages with no description information (don't 
know if

dpkg-query -l behaves this way or if its garbage from older repositories)

When I tried to apt-get a package I got the following output :


oraculo:/home/dlsa# apt-get install terminal.app
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 terminal.app: Depends: gnustep-back0.11 (= 0.11.0) but it is not 
installable
   Depends: gnustep-gpbs (= 0.11.0) but it is not going to 
be installed

E: Broken packages

Then I ran a dpkg -C to get a list of broken packages and it showed me 
nothing


I usually use synaptic to do package mgmt, and the error it shows me 
when I try
to install it, is that this package is from a repository no longer in 
the list, and that

some package that is installed depends on dependencies of it.

Is it possible to know which packages are blocking the installation of 
this one ?
Is it possible to clean the package list from these packages that have 
no know location but are on the list because of dependencies ? (maybe by 
uninstalling the

ones that depend on them)

Many thanks
Daniel Santos




I suggest going into aptitude's interactive interface as a normal user. 
Aptitude will let you see what packages depend upon gnustep-back and 
gnustep-gpbs.


From the command line, you might do this:

aptitude search '~i~Dgnustep-back'
aptitude search '~i~Dgnustep-gpbs'

But the curses interface makes research easier.

Your difficulties probably stem from creating a mixed system. Try to 
make sure your system is fully Etch or Lenny or Sid--not a mixture of 
Etch, Lenny and Sid--and you'll have fewer headaches.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Package list problem

2007-09-13 Thread Andrei Popescu
Daniel Santos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yes.
 
 In my last message I don't know if it was clear but I meant that the
 package which was to be installed (terminal.app) is on the package
 list because I have some other packages that depend on it. Since the
 repository that had that package is no longer in my list, it remains
 there because some other package depends on it. Probably it is hiding
 the same package on one of the repositories configured.

Sounds kind of strange to me ... (but I'm no expert either)

 Is there some documentation on the package list format and how can I 
 search it
 for the packages that keep the phantom package in the list ?

I think you mean reverse dependencies. Try

apt-cache rdepends terminal.app

Regards,
Andrei
-- 
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Package list problem

2007-09-12 Thread Daniel Santos

Hello,

I am running dpkg version 1.14.4.

I've had several repositories configured, and kept changing them for some
time because I had internet access problems. Anyway, the package list shows
a lot of uninstalled packages with no description information (don't know if
dpkg-query -l behaves this way or if its garbage from older repositories)

When I tried to apt-get a package I got the following output :


oraculo:/home/dlsa# apt-get install terminal.app
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 terminal.app: Depends: gnustep-back0.11 (= 0.11.0) but it is not 
installable
   Depends: gnustep-gpbs (= 0.11.0) but it is not going to 
be installed

E: Broken packages

Then I ran a dpkg -C to get a list of broken packages and it showed me 
nothing


I usually use synaptic to do package mgmt, and the error it shows me 
when I try
to install it, is that this package is from a repository no longer in 
the list, and that

some package that is installed depends on dependencies of it.

Is it possible to know which packages are blocking the installation of 
this one ?
Is it possible to clean the package list from these packages that have 
no know location but are on the list because of dependencies ? (maybe by 
uninstalling the

ones that depend on them)

Many thanks
Daniel Santos


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




apt-get package list problem

2001-07-17 Thread Frank Zimmermann

Hello,

I added the line for security updates to my sources list as 
mentioned on the security web site. Now I get the following message 
whenever I run apt-get:


(voyager):/home/frank# apt-get install kde-base-crypto
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
W: Couldn't stat source package list 'http://security.debian.org 
potato/updates/non-US Packages' 
(/var/state/apt/lists/security.debian.org_dists_potato_updates_non-US_binary-i386_Packages) 
- stat (2 No such file or directory)

W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these missing files
E: Couldn't find package kde-base-crypto

Unfortunately running apt-get update does not solve the problem, I 
get the same error message. How do I get the package list for non-US?


Here is my sources.list:

deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 r3 _Potato_ - Official i386 Binary-3 
(20010427)]

/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main
deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 r3 _Potato_ - Official i386 Binary-2 
(20010427)]

/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main
deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 r3 _Potato_ - Official i386 Binary-1 
(20010427)]

/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main
deb http://security.debian.org potato/updates main contrib non-free 
non-US

#deb http://www.openoffice.de/debian/ potato main
deb ftp://ftp.mirror.ac.uk/sites/ftp.debian.org/debian/ potato non-free
deb ftp://ftp.wh9.tu-dresden.de/pub/linux/debian-stuff/KDE2 potato 
main crypto optional



Thanx,
Frank








Re: apt-get package list problem

2001-07-17 Thread Sebastiaan
Hello,

On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Frank Zimmermann wrote:

 deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 r3 _Potato_ - Official i386 Binary-3 
 (20010427)]
 / unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main
 deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 r3 _Potato_ - Official i386 Binary-2 
 (20010427)]
 / unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main
 deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 r3 _Potato_ - Official i386 Binary-1 
 (20010427)]
 / unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main
 deb http://security.debian.org potato/updates main contrib non-free 
 non-US
 #deb http://www.openoffice.de/debian/ potato main
 deb ftp://ftp.mirror.ac.uk/sites/ftp.debian.org/debian/ potato non-free
 deb ftp://ftp.wh9.tu-dresden.de/pub/linux/debian-stuff/KDE2 potato 
 main crypto optional
 
 
It should be:
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security/ stable/updates main contrib
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-non-US/ stable/non-US main contrib

(well, it works).

Greetz,
Sebastiaan




Re: apt-get package list problem

2001-07-17 Thread Frank Zimmermann

Sebastiaan wrote:


Hello,
It should be:
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security/ stable/updates main contrib
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-non-US/ stable/non-US main contrib

(well, it works).

Greetz,
Sebastiaan



I see. Bu tthat is not obvious from the instruction on this site 
http://www.debian.org/security/


So beeing new to debian I just thought follow the instructions on 
the Debian-site.




Thank you,
Frank



Re: apt-get package list problem

2001-07-17 Thread Joost Kooij
Thanks, Josip.

- Forwarded message from Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

 - Forwarded message from Frank Zimmermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
 
 From: Frank Zimmermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
 Subject: Re: apt-get package list problem
 
 Sebastiaan wrote:
 
  Hello,
  It should be:
  deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security/ stable/updates main contrib

The web page says

deb http://security.debian.org/ potato/updates main contrib non-free

And it works.

  deb http://security.debian.org/debian-non-US/ stable/non-US main contrib

No, this is wrong, just because the non-US archive happens to be on the same
site as the security updates, it shouldn't be referenced that way.

Something like this should be used:

deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US potato/non-US main non-free

 I see. Bu tthat is not obvious from the instruction on this site 
 http://www.debian.org/security/
 
 So beeing new to debian I just thought follow the instructions on 
 the Debian-site.

Well I honestly don't see what went wrong, all of the sources.list lines on
www.d.o have been checked and double-checked, you can be sure of that. :)

-- 
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification

- End forwarded message -