Re: problems installing g++
Well, The problem was urgent and I need the compiler. So ... reinstall Debian was the only solution. Now that I am reintalling my CDRW, I have difficulties. I have compiler the kernel with the right options as said in CDRW-how-to (and this did work in the previous system) but I have this complain: /lib/modules/2.4.22/kernel/drivers/scsi/sr_mod.o: unresolved symbol unregister_cdrom_Rsmp_703d3575 /lib/modules/2.4.22/kernel/drivers/scsi/sr_mod.o: unresolved symbol cdrom_release_Rsmp_b388b28c /lib/modules/2.4.22/kernel/drivers/scsi/sr_mod.o: unresolved symbol cdrom_number_of_slots_Rsmp_5d8f3672 /lib/modules/2.4.22/kernel/drivers/scsi/sr_mod.o: unresolved symbol register_cdrom_Rsmp_5a61744f /lib/modules/2.4.22/kernel/drivers/scsi/sr_mod.o: unresolved symbol cdrom_media_changed_Rsmp_0054e9fe /lib/modules/2.4.22/kernel/drivers/scsi/sr_mod.o: unresolved symbol cdrom_ioctl_Rsmp_bb7265aa /lib/modules/2.4.22/kernel/drivers/scsi/sr_mod.o: unresolved symbol cdrom_open_Rsmp_837500f7 Any help? Thank you Arian Sebastian Kapfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 00:40:12 +0200, A. Novruzi wrote: Now, I try to install g++. The system complains different problems like the package x requires package y, while y requires x. So it does not install g++. Please show the exact message. Probably it's just some old package which apt-get doesn't dare to remove. Once you remove it manually, the installation should work. My previous g++ worked perfeclty but what I have now, gcc, it does not know any *.h classes. What's a *.h class? Do you mean header files? Do I have to make a new install of my Debian or somthing better is possible. No, I'm 99% sure that you don't have to reinstall. -- Best Regards, | Hi! I'm a .signature virus. Copy me into Sebastian | your ~/.signature to help me spread! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
problems installing g++
Hi, After some problems I had with libc6 version, I made an updrage with apt-get dist-upgrade. Now, I try to install g++. The system complains different problems like the package x requires package y, while y requires x. So it does not install g++. How one can deal with this problem? My previous g++ worked perfeclty but what I have now, gcc, it does not know any *.h classes. Do I have to make a new install of my Debian or somthing better is possible. Thank you for any help! Arian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problems installing g++
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 03:07:33PM -0700, A. Novruzi wrote: After some problems I had with libc6 version, I made an updrage with apt-get dist-upgrade. Now, I try to install g++. The system complains different problems like the package x requires package y, while y requires x. So it does not install g++. Please, never try to summarize error messages; that just makes them harder to interpret. Just quote the original error message exactly and let your audience deal with figuring it out. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problems installing g++
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 00:40:12 +0200, A. Novruzi wrote: Now, I try to install g++. The system complains different problems like the package x requires package y, while y requires x. So it does not install g++. Please show the exact message. Probably it's just some old package which apt-get doesn't dare to remove. Once you remove it manually, the installation should work. My previous g++ worked perfeclty but what I have now, gcc, it does not know any *.h classes. What's a *.h class? Do you mean header files? Do I have to make a new install of my Debian or somthing better is possible. No, I'm 99% sure that you don't have to reinstall. -- Best Regards, | Hi! I'm a .signature virus. Copy me into Sebastian | your ~/.signature to help me spread! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to change a symlink without breaking anything (problems with g++)
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 06:50:48PM -0400, David Z Maze wrote: Morten Eriksen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What is the correct manner of changing a symlink file belonging to a Debian package? Is it sufficient to just rm and re-link, or should I use any of the package-handling tools? You can't. (Well, you can, but the next time you upgrade the package, your change will be overwritten.) If the package in question uses alternatives, you can use update-alternatives or directly change the link in /etc/alternatives. There's one way you've missed: dpkg-divert. I'd say that's the correct choice here. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to change a symlink without breaking anything (problems with g++)
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 08:14:34PM +0200, Morten Eriksen wrote: (In case someone is interested, I'm asking because I just stumbled over a surprising issue with the g++ packages: doing an # apt-get install g++ installed g++-3.3 (I was expecting just an upgrade to the previously installed g++-2.95), and made /usr/bin/g++ into a symlink pointing to it. Why is this surprising? This isn't happening in Woody, so you're either using Sarge or Sid. The C++ transition has endlessly been debated and beaten to death in a variety of public fora... if you don't know about it, you're living under a rock and probably shouldn't be using anything other than stable. Just switching g++ versions like this is bound to cause mayhem for all development against any C++ libraries on the system already compiled with g++ v2.95, so I'm surprised that this happens just like that from the testing branch..? Yep. Amazingly enough, Debian planned this transition, and packages needing to move to the new ABI are doing so. Perhaps you haven't noticed all the packages now with c102 in their names? Sid is pretty much complete, I think... Sarge probably has a way to go. I've not updated my Sarge box in a while so I don't know for sure. Locally compiled applications, of course, have the potential to break. OTOT, if you're compiling stuff locally, the assumption is that you have at least minimal clue. Removing the g++-3.3 package doesn't work either, as apt-get seems to now refuse to remove or install _either_ g++-2.95 or g++-3.3 -- it insists on having both? Weird.) So? The compilers are independent... use 2.95 when you need to and use 3.3 when you need to. Building kernels, for example, should not be done with gcc 3.3 just yet (yes, I'm sure there's some idiot who's about to rant about how wonderful his gcc_3.3-compiled kernel is... pay attention to lkml for the number of regressions still being found). Most of the rest of the world started this process some time ago. -- Marc Wilson | Confound these ancestors They've stolen our [EMAIL PROTECTED] | best ideas! - Ben Jonson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to change a symlink without breaking anything (problems with g++)
Marc Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The C++ transition has endlessly been debated and beaten to death in a variety of public fora... if you don't know about it, you're living under a rock [...] I have indeed lived under a rock, not participating nor reading any of the Debian public fora up until now. Sorry for my ignorance on this issue. and probably shouldn't be using anything other than stable. You are probably right. I developed the bad habit of considering testing as stable back at the later stages of when Woody was testing, and stable was more like green with fungus. ;-) Anyway, thanks for informing me. Thanks also to the other respondents, who pointed at dpkg-divert, which was the kind of solution I was initially looking for. My problem turned out in the end to be better solved by doing apt-get remove g++ followed with apt-get install g++/stable, as indicated by Marc.. ~# Morten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to change a symlink without breaking anything (problems with g++)
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 02:24:30PM +0200, Morten Eriksen wrote: Marc Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The C++ transition has endlessly been debated and beaten to death in a variety of public fora... if you don't know about it, you're living under a rock [...] I have indeed lived under a rock, not participating nor reading any of the Debian public fora up until now. Sorry for my ignorance on this issue. One public forum you might like to read is debian-devel-announce. It's pretty low-traffic, and while its posts often expect a fair degree of technical knowledge it's a very good way to keep up to date with what's happening in testing and unstable. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to change a symlink without breaking anything (problems with g++)
Hi, this is probably a newbie question, but I didn't see it covered in any of the FAQs or HOW-TOs I found at debian.org/docs/ (and the list search facilities seems quite sloppy, and I had no luck there either): What is the correct manner of changing a symlink file belonging to a Debian package? Is it sufficient to just rm and re-link, or should I use any of the package-handling tools? (In case someone is interested, I'm asking because I just stumbled over a surprising issue with the g++ packages: doing an # apt-get install g++ installed g++-3.3 (I was expecting just an upgrade to the previously installed g++-2.95), and made /usr/bin/g++ into a symlink pointing to it. Just switching g++ versions like this is bound to cause mayhem for all development against any C++ libraries on the system already compiled with g++ v2.95, so I'm surprised that this happens just like that from the testing branch..? Removing the g++-3.3 package doesn't work either, as apt-get seems to now refuse to remove or install _either_ g++-2.95 or g++-3.3 -- it insists on having both? Weird.) ~# Morten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HELP: Problems with G++ : Try ./hello and not hello
Try ./hello instead of hello (at the bash promt) I am having difficulties getting g++ to compile properly. I am just testing it with a simple hello program. When I type ... g++ -g -Wall -ohello hello.cc The file - hello - is created. When I type, hello to execute the program. The bash shell tells me there is no such command. What am I doing wrong? I need to get this working for my class on Monday. Thanks, Denis
HELP: Problems with G++
I am having difficulties getting g++ to compile properly. I am just testing it with a simple hello program. When I type ... g++ -g -Wall -ohello hello.cc The file - hello - is created. When I type, hello to execute the program. The bash shell tells me there is no such command. What am I doing wrong? I need to get this working for my class on Monday. Thanks, Denis
Re: HELP: Problems with G++
On Thu, 27 Aug 1998, DMDP wrote: I am having difficulties getting g++ to compile properly. I am just testing it with a simple hello program. When I type ... g++ -g -Wall -ohello hello.cc The file - hello - is created. When I type, hello to execute the program. The bash shell tells me there is no such command. What am I doing wrong? I need to get this working for my class on Monday. Thanks, Denis try `./hello` - If you are working as root (everyone says that is a Bad Thing (tm)), the current directory is not in the path. If you are working as your normal user (Good Thing (tm)), then I would suggest you bash (no pun intended) me in the head and say Get outta the way! I'll ask a real guru. Another thing to check, make sure it has executable permissions. (r-xr-xr-x) or the like. Good Luck, Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) PGP Key available, reply with pgpkey as subject. - If you don't know where you want to go, we'll make sure you get taken. -Japanese Microsoft ad slogan translated back into English - Debian GNU/Linux Ooohh You are missing out!
Re: Problems with g++
On Jun 9, Sebastien Phelep wrote
gcc is 2.7.2.2-4; libg++ is 2.7.2.1-9 / 2.7.2.5-1
I guess it's because I've used unstable packages, but I'm note sure.
Does anybody knows what's the problem is ?
Debian's gcc 2.7.2.2 packages by default use with libc6; for libc6 you need
the libg++272 package.
2.7.2.5-1 is the libg++272 (libc6) package. but 2.7.2.1-9 is the libc5
version. So, my guess is that Sebastien has --force-depends installed
the libc5 devel package on a libc6 system.
$ dpkg -l 'libg++*'|grep '^i'
ii libg++272.7.2.1-9 The GNU C++ libraries (ELF version).
ii libg++272 2.7.2.5-1 The GNU C++ libraries (ELF version).
ii libg++272-dbg 2.7.2.5-1 The GNU C++ libraries (ELF version).
ii libg++272-dev 2.7.2.5-1 The GNU C++ libraries (ELF version).
If you get that output, the compiling g++ stuff should be OK.
(at least it's on my system).
As not all libraries are ready/available for libc6, it is probably best to
downgrade your gcc (using dpkg) to the 2.7.2.1 version, and put it (and
cpp) on Hold in dselect.
May work, but the g++ stuff works fine here (and I've got positive
reports from others too).
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777iX+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$kSK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)
#what's this? see http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Problems with g++
Hello. I'm having problems with g++: when I launch a program I've compiled with it, I have a segmentation fault; I first thought that it was my program that was bad, but even if I make a *very* simple program (a Point class, with a main that just adds a new point and deletes it immediately after), I get a SEGV signal. I've tried to find what was wrong with gdb; it says that it comes from getenv()... even if I don't use getenv ! gcc is 2.7.2.2-4; libg++ is 2.7.2.1-9 / 2.7.2.5-1 I guess it's because I've used unstable packages, but I'm note sure. Does anybody knows what's the problem is ? Thanks, Seb. PS: Oh yes, it compiles without any warnings... --- Sébastien Phélep - Etudiant en deuxième année d'informatique, IUT de Vannes. [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Re: Problems with g++
On Jun 9, Sebastien Phelep wrote gcc is 2.7.2.2-4; libg++ is 2.7.2.1-9 / 2.7.2.5-1 I guess it's because I've used unstable packages, but I'm note sure. Does anybody knows what's the problem is ? Debian's gcc 2.7.2.2 packages by default use with libc6; for libc6 you need the libg++272 package. As not all libraries are ready/available for libc6, it is probably best to downgrade your gcc (using dpkg) to the 2.7.2.1 version, and put it (and cpp) on Hold in dselect. HTH, Ray -- LEADERSHIP A form of self-preservation exhibited by people with auto- destructive imaginations in order to ensure that when it comes to the crunch it'll be someone else's bones which go crack and not their own. - The Hipcrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
