Re: Network config help needed
Yep, read Net-HOWTO, but still I can't get it to work. ... Setting up the loopback and pingin it works fine, pinging into the machine also works fine (tried from an old win95 machine). But pinging out of the machine dosn't work, I'm getting the error message Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host when telnetting. Is ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up enough to set up the network, I don't have to edit /etc/hosts or something else? On 2 Mar 2003, at 10:05, praveen kallakuri wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- you dont have a lo in ur route: loopback interface. check whether you can ping to yourself (lo) 127.0.0.1 on each pc. then configure pc1 as 192.168.0.1. repeat the two steps with pc2, only changing the ip address. the initial sections of Net-HOWTO must help. solong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please help me I'm trying to connect two pc's, but I allways get the message unable to connect to remote host: No route to host. What am I missing? My config for pc1 looks like this: ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up rout add -host 192.168.0.2 eth0 route -n output: 192.168.0.2 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0UH 0 0 0 eth0 /etc/hosts domain home search home nameserver 10.0.0.1 nameserver 10.0.0.2 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com iQB1AwUBPmIrugSOhI6OETvlAQGXogMAxNdOci2Hq7P+oAsQgg2GF6Gdj6xKVwU4 h7H9RNO+mOx7EG0ZllbKI40UY71th2+aUeQJnsOdOlGhC5s4MBMPnCFGaWQBvXIw 8yZE0HdNJiuL39IZilLYW60WBrWWTQpv =EQvk -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Network config help needed
Barry deFreese NTS Technology Services Manager Nike Team Sports -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 1:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Network config help needed Yep, read Net-HOWTO, but still I can't get it to work. ... Setting up the loopback and pingin it works fine, pinging into the machine also works fine (tried from an old win95 machine). But pinging out of the machine dosn't work, I'm getting the error message Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host when telnetting. Is ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up enough to set up the network, I don't have to edit /etc/hosts or something else? Chris, Your /etc/network/interfaces should look like so: iface eth0 inet static address 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 network 192.168.0.0 broadcast 192.168.0.255 gateway 192.168.0.?? -- Whatever your default router/gateway address is. Actually the gateway shouldn't matter since the other host is on the same subnet. Again, you need to verify that the subnet mask for both hosts are the same. Barry deFreese NTS Technology Services Manager Nike Team Sports (949)-616-4005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Technology doesn't make you less stupid; it just makes you stupid faster. Jerry Gregoire - Former CIO at Dell -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Network config help needed
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 at 9:00pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: :Setting up the loopback and pingin it works fine, pinging into the :machine also works fine (tried from an old win95 machine). But :pinging out of the machine dosn't work, I'm getting the error message :Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host when telnetting. Does route -n show a gateway? It should show something like: Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 00 0 eth1 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG00 0 eth1 If it shows something like Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 00 0 eth1 then you don't have a default gateway set up. Do route add default gw 192.168.1.1 substituting the correct IP address for your gateway of course. Edit /etc/interfaces (as directed at man interfaces) to have it work on boot. Patrick -- Patrick Wiseman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux user #17943 *Google First, Ask Later* -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Network config help needed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- you dont have a lo in ur route: loopback interface. check whether you can ping to yourself (lo) 127.0.0.1 on each pc. then configure pc1 as 192.168.0.1. repeat the two steps with pc2, only changing the ip address. the initial sections of Net-HOWTO must help. solong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please help me I'm trying to connect two pc's, but I allways get the message unable to connect to remote host: No route to host. What am I missing? My config for pc1 looks like this: ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up rout add -host 192.168.0.2 eth0 route -n output: 192.168.0.2 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0UH 0 0 0 eth0 /etc/hosts domain home search home nameserver 10.0.0.1 nameserver 10.0.0.2 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com iQB1AwUBPmIrugSOhI6OETvlAQGXogMAxNdOci2Hq7P+oAsQgg2GF6Gdj6xKVwU4 h7H9RNO+mOx7EG0ZllbKI40UY71th2+aUeQJnsOdOlGhC5s4MBMPnCFGaWQBvXIw 8yZE0HdNJiuL39IZilLYW60WBrWWTQpv =EQvk -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Network config help needed
Am Son, 2003-03-02 um 13.15 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Please help me I'm trying to connect two pc's, but I allways get the message unable to connect to remote host: No route to host. What am I missing? My config for pc1 looks like this: ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up rout add -host 192.168.0.2 eth0 You don't need this special route to host .2 - it's alraedy fullfilled with the standard-route to the network. But it should not disturb. route -n output: 192.168.0.2 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0UH 0 0 0 eth0 /etc/hosts domainhome searchhome nameserver 10.0.0.1 nameserver 10.0.0.2 Where is the route to your nameservers? -- Wilfried Essig [EMAIL PROTECTED] Familie Essig -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Network config help needed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please help me I'm trying to connect two pc's, but I allways get the message unable to connect to remote host: No route to host. What am I missing? My config for pc1 looks like this: ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up rout add -host 192.168.0.2 eth0 route -n output: 192.168.0.2 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0UH 0 0 0 eth0 /etc/hosts domain home search home nameserver 10.0.0.1 nameserver 10.0.0.2 You shouldn't need a route for the other host. Because they are on the same subnet, broadcasts should see that machine. Remove the route for 192.168.0.2 and try it again. If you still can't see it, I would guess that you have a subnet mask problem on one of the two machines. -- Barry deFreese Debian 3.0r1 Woody Registered Linux Newbie #302256 - Debian Developer Wannabe Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning. Rich Cook. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
