Re: Offtopic - Amiga and Linux join forces?

1999-07-20 Thread Keith G. Murphy
Stefan Nobis wrote:
 
  In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Keith G. Murphy
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 KGM If the Amiga folks are not going to use any of the GNU tools, or
 KGM dpkg/apt especially, that would be a perverse decision.  In fact,
 KGM not making it based on/compatible with m68k Debian would be
 KGM perverse, seems to me.
 
 I think you still missunderstand the point. The Amiga folks is looking
 for a new kernel. The will take the Linux kernel, cause there are much
 device drivers, so they are only interested in hardware
 support. Around this kernel they will make an AmigaOS. So nothing will
 look like a Linux, not the command line, not the GUI and there is a
 good chance even the API will not look like the Linux API. It will be
 the innermost section of the OS which is based on Linux. As i
 understand the text, you can say, Linux is something like the Hardware
 Abstraction Layer of NT for the new AmigaOS. And on this Linux, which
 is there to support more hardware, a complete AmigaOS is set on
 top. And with this AmigaOS the user and even the programmer has to
 deal, so neither of them will see anything of Linux.
 
 And from this point of view, the hole thing has nothing to do with any
 Linux-Distribution.
It is a Linux distribution by definition.  Just a highly unusual one. 
You've shown, however that, for example, Debian would not be an
appropriate choice, given the decision to only use the Linux kernel.  I
would question that very decision, though.  Think, for example, of all
the software their users will forego being able to use if *all* they're
using is the kernel...  And they still have all the effort associated
with solely maintaining their distribution.  But I guess they don't want
to tick off their old user base.  Maybe the developers don't want any
competition from open source, either.  What *I* would have wanted would
just be a boot manager like LILO or System Commander so I could still
run my old stuff (games) the old way.  Or, AmigEMU.  :-)
 
 And if they take gcc as their compiler or use the dpkg/apt package
 tools for managing installed software is quite another question - it
 matters as much as asking, why not using dpkg/apt tools for windows
 for software installation/administration.
 
It would seem to me more comparable to Mac with the Mach/BSD kernel,
and, I guess, no BSD utilities or binary compatibility with anything
else.  It makes more apparent sense for Mac, though, with a larger
existing user and developer base.

Still, only time will tell.  I hope it's something nifty.


Re: Offtopic - Amiga and Linux join forces?

1999-07-15 Thread Stefan Nobis
 In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Keith G. Murphy
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

KGM If the Amiga folks are not going to use any of the GNU tools, or
KGM dpkg/apt especially, that would be a perverse decision.  In fact,
KGM not making it based on/compatible with m68k Debian would be
KGM perverse, seems to me.

I think you still missunderstand the point. The Amiga folks is looking 
for a new kernel. The will take the Linux kernel, cause there are much 
device drivers, so they are only interested in hardware
support. Around this kernel they will make an AmigaOS. So nothing will 
look like a Linux, not the command line, not the GUI and there is a
good chance even the API will not look like the Linux API. It will be
the innermost section of the OS which is based on Linux. As i
understand the text, you can say, Linux is something like the Hardware 
Abstraction Layer of NT for the new AmigaOS. And on this Linux, which
is there to support more hardware, a complete AmigaOS is set on
top. And with this AmigaOS the user and even the programmer has to
deal, so neither of them will see anything of Linux.

And from this point of view, the hole thing has nothing to do with any 
Linux-Distribution.

And if they take gcc as their compiler or use the dpkg/apt package
tools for managing installed software is quite another question - it
matters as much as asking, why not using dpkg/apt tools for windows
for software installation/administration.

-- 
Until the next mail...,
Stefan.


RE: Offtopic - Amiga and Linux join forces?

1999-07-15 Thread David Karlin
  In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Keith G. Murphy
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
snip 
 for a new kernel. The will take the Linux kernel, cause there are much 
 device drivers, so they are only interested in hardware
 support. Around this kernel they will make an AmigaOS. So nothing will 
 look like a Linux, not the command line, not the GUI and there is a
 good chance even the API will not look like the Linux API. It will be
 the innermost section of the OS which is based on Linux. As i
 understand the text, you can say, Linux is something like the Hardware 
 Abstraction Layer of NT for the new AmigaOS. And on this Linux, which
 is there to support more hardware, a complete AmigaOS is set on
 top. And with this AmigaOS the user and even the programmer has to
 deal, so neither of them will see anything of Linux.
 
 And from this point of view, the hole thing has nothing to do with any 
 Linux-Distribution.

Well, they are distributing an OS with the Linux kernel.  IMO,
that makes it a Linux distribution.  If they don't use GNU tools,
then it's not a GNU distribution of Linux, though.  

It still won't have a look familiar to GNU/Linux users, or
freeBSD users, or any other *nix user, so it's a safe bet that
they won't be stealing from the GNU/Linux userbase.

Just my $.02.

--David

-- 
===
David Karlin
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://funk48.home.travelin.com
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux 2.1
===


Re: Offtopic - Amiga and Linux join forces?

1999-07-14 Thread Keith G. Murphy


Brian Servis wrote:
 
 *- On 13 Jul, Keith G. Murphy wrote about Re: Offtopic - Amiga and Linux 
 join forces?
 
 
  Brian Servis wrote:
 
[cut]
  They are not making another distribution.  They are just using the
  Linux kernel, most other things will be all Amiga, of course they will
  be bound by the GPL to release any improvements they make to the
  kernel.  Read the following for more info:
 
  http://www.amigactive.com/newsitems/11071999-lnx.html
 
  Thanks for the link.  It explains a lot.  I would quibble, however, and
  contend that this *is* yet another Linux distribution: it is a
  distribution of an OS that includes the Linux kernel.  That's a Linux
  distribution by definition, AFAIK.  Also, there's this:
 
  Amiga assure us that the AmigaSoft Operating
   Environment will not be just another Linux distribution.
 
  Meaning, in usual speech, that it is *a* Linux distribution (not *just*
  another, though).
 
  They're insane if they don't base it on Debian, considering the work
  that's already been done on m68k machines.  I mean, the debs are there
  and ready to be used, man!
 
 
 I think you misunderstand, I am not an expert but it doesn't sound like
 they are going to use any of the userland tools, i.e. the stuff that
 makes Debian Debian or Redhat Redhat.  They are just going to use the
 kernel which is the interface between the software and the hardware and
 is completely independent of ANY 'distribution' that is run on top of
 it.  For that matter Microsoft could choose to use the Linux kernel and
 still have the same 'distribution' as they have now.
 
Well, in my view, that would be a Linux distribution.  (Also not being
an expert).  It wouldn't be a GNU/Linux distribution, though.  Let's not
go on that jihad here, though.  ;-)  At one time, Tom Christiansen was
talking about doing a distribution that was a Linux kernel with BSD
tools, rather than GNU.  IIRC, he called it a Linux distribution.  (I
think he was just doing it to irritate the FSF.  Is it still an extant
project?)

If the Amiga folks are not going to use any of the GNU tools, or
dpkg/apt especially, that would be a perverse decision.  In fact, not
making it based on/compatible with m68k Debian would be perverse, seems
to me.
-- 
... if the problem persists ... get  a  3.5  ft ... length of sucker rod
and have a chat with the user in question.
-- Linux System Administration,
   SYSLOGD (8), page 7
   (Dealing with DOS attacks exploiting SYSLOGD)


Re: Offtopic - Amiga and Linux join forces?

1999-07-13 Thread Keith G. Murphy


Brian Servis wrote:
 
 *- On 12 Jul, Keith G. Murphy wrote about Re: Offtopic - Amiga and Linux 
 join forces?
  Chrisopher D. Judd wrote:
 
  Hi,
 
   This is not Debian related, but if you're interested have a look at
  http://www.amiga.com/diary/executive/linux-e.html.
 
  Sounds like he really knows what he's doing.  Also, look at:
 
  http://www.amiga.com/diary/executive/990710-e.html
 
  for an update.
 
  I wonder if they've talked with the Debian developers, or Amigas will
  sell with yet another distribution?
 
 
 They are not making another distribution.  They are just using the
 Linux kernel, most other things will be all Amiga, of course they will
 be bound by the GPL to release any improvements they make to the
 kernel.  Read the following for more info:
 
 http://www.amigactive.com/newsitems/11071999-lnx.html
 
Thanks for the link.  It explains a lot.  I would quibble, however, and
contend that this *is* yet another Linux distribution: it is a
distribution of an OS that includes the Linux kernel.  That's a Linux
distribution by definition, AFAIK.  Also, there's this:

Amiga assure us that the AmigaSoft Operating
 Environment will not be just another Linux distribution.

Meaning, in usual speech, that it is *a* Linux distribution (not *just*
another, though).

They're insane if they don't base it on Debian, considering the work
that's already been done on m68k machines.  I mean, the debs are there
and ready to be used, man!

I'd be running Linux on my old Amiga right now if

(1) There were drivers for my GVP disk controller.

(2) Supported Ethernet cards for the Amiga weren't so *damned*
expensive.


Re: Offtopic - Amiga and Linux join forces?

1999-07-13 Thread Brian Servis
*- On 13 Jul, Keith G. Murphy wrote about Re: Offtopic - Amiga and Linux join 
forces?
 
 
 Brian Servis wrote:
 
 *- On 12 Jul, Keith G. Murphy wrote about Re: Offtopic - Amiga and Linux 
 join forces?
  Chrisopher D. Judd wrote:
 
  Hi,
 
   This is not Debian related, but if you're interested have a look at
  http://www.amiga.com/diary/executive/linux-e.html.
 
  Sounds like he really knows what he's doing.  Also, look at:
 
  http://www.amiga.com/diary/executive/990710-e.html
 
  for an update.
 
  I wonder if they've talked with the Debian developers, or Amigas will
  sell with yet another distribution?
 
 
 They are not making another distribution.  They are just using the
 Linux kernel, most other things will be all Amiga, of course they will
 be bound by the GPL to release any improvements they make to the
 kernel.  Read the following for more info:
 
 http://www.amigactive.com/newsitems/11071999-lnx.html
 
 Thanks for the link.  It explains a lot.  I would quibble, however, and
 contend that this *is* yet another Linux distribution: it is a
 distribution of an OS that includes the Linux kernel.  That's a Linux
 distribution by definition, AFAIK.  Also, there's this:
 
 Amiga assure us that the AmigaSoft Operating
  Environment will not be just another Linux distribution.
 
 Meaning, in usual speech, that it is *a* Linux distribution (not *just*
 another, though).
 
 They're insane if they don't base it on Debian, considering the work
 that's already been done on m68k machines.  I mean, the debs are there
 and ready to be used, man!
 

I think you misunderstand, I am not an expert but it doesn't sound like
they are going to use any of the userland tools, i.e. the stuff that
makes Debian Debian or Redhat Redhat.  They are just going to use the
kernel which is the interface between the software and the hardware and
is completely independent of ANY 'distribution' that is run on top of
it.  For that matter Microsoft could choose to use the Linux kernel and
still have the same 'distribution' as they have now.  

-- 
Brian 
-
Mechanical Engineering  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Purdue University   http://www.ecn.purdue.edu/~servis
-


Re: Offtopic - Amiga and Linux join forces?

1999-07-12 Thread Keith G. Murphy
Chrisopher D. Judd wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
  This is not Debian related, but if you're interested have a look at
 http://www.amiga.com/diary/executive/linux-e.html.

Sounds like he really knows what he's doing.  Also, look at:

http://www.amiga.com/diary/executive/990710-e.html

for an update.

I wonder if they've talked with the Debian developers, or Amigas will
sell with yet another distribution?

-- 
... if the problem persists ... get  a  3.5  ft ... length of sucker rod
and have a chat with the user in question.
-- Linux System Administration,
   SYSLOGD (8), page 7
   (Dealing with DOS attacks exploiting SYSLOGD)


Re: Offtopic - Amiga and Linux join forces?

1999-07-12 Thread Brian Servis
*- On 12 Jul, Keith G. Murphy wrote about Re: Offtopic - Amiga and Linux join 
forces?
 Chrisopher D. Judd wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
  This is not Debian related, but if you're interested have a look at
 http://www.amiga.com/diary/executive/linux-e.html.
 
 Sounds like he really knows what he's doing.  Also, look at:
 
 http://www.amiga.com/diary/executive/990710-e.html
 
 for an update.
 
 I wonder if they've talked with the Debian developers, or Amigas will
 sell with yet another distribution?
 

They are not making another distribution.  They are just using the
Linux kernel, most other things will be all Amiga, of course they will
be bound by the GPL to release any improvements they make to the
kernel.  Read the following for more info:

http://www.amigactive.com/newsitems/11071999-lnx.html

-- 
Brian 
-
Mechanical Engineering  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Purdue University   http://www.ecn.purdue.edu/~servis
-