Re: Graphics 1920x1440, monitor 1680x1050, nv 1280x1024.

[Dave Thayer]

On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 10:54:35AM +0100, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
> Fiddling with the monitor menu i came across this:
> 
> DIV
> 1280x1024
> 64KHz 60Hz
> 
> ...that'll be useful for a modeline i guess - how can i make one?

There are actually a ton of howtos for calculating modelines out
there, mostly dating from the not-so-good old days of handcrafted 
XF86Config files. For instance, the mythtv folks have one at
. Googling
"modeline howto" yields 68,600 hits which would keep you busy for a
while.

That said, I'd probably try the following:

1) Since you plan to do so anyway, go ahead and install the
proprietary nvidia driver using module-assistant. For practice, do it
from a VT console for when^W^W in case you ever screw up your X.

2) Get it set up to your panel's native resolution. Anything other
than native res or some integer sub-multiple is going to look fuzzy,
even if you use the monitor's built-in stretching.

3) Use "xvidtune -show" to get the current modeline that the nvidia
driver has so kindly figured out for you.

4) With this modeline in hand, edit your xorg.conf to set up the nv
driver as a fallback.

HTH

dt

-- 
Dave Thayer   | Whenever you read a good book, it's like the 
Denver, Colorado USA  | author is right there, in the room talking to 
d...@thayer-boyle.com | you, which is why I don't like to read 
  | good books. - Jack Handey "Deep Thoughts"


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Graphics 1920x1440, monitor 1680x1050, nv 1280x1024.

[Micha Feigin]

On Tue, 5 May 2009 10:54:35 +0100
Nuno Magalhães  wrote:

> Fiddling with the monitor menu i came across this:
> 
> DIV
> 1280x1024
> 64KHz 60Hz
> 

That is the current mode it is using. I don't know how to convert it into a 
modeline

> ...that'll be useful for a modeline i guess - how can i make one?
> It does have a menu for Full/4:3, i changed to 4:3., which stole
> screen-area, i now have two black stripes. Even if restarting X will
> give me the full res i don't think it's work it, but at least i'll be
> getting somewhere.
> 

It should be on full. I thought that it may be the other way around.

> Also, my BIOS has nothing related to the video settings, at least not
> related to the resolution.
> 
> Are there any programs (for amd64) to read the EDID?
> 

At least with the nvidia driver, the nvidia-settings program can save the edid

> Looking at the log[0], i saw this:
> 
> #
> (II) NV(0): Probing for EDID on I2C bus A...
> #
> (II) NV(0): I2C device "DDC:E-EDID segment register" registered at address 
> 0x60.
> #
> (II) NV(0): I2C device "DDC:ddc2" registered at address 0xA0.
> #
> (II) NV(0):   ... none found
> #
> (II) NV(0): Probing for EDID on I2C bus B...
> #
> (II) NV(0):   ... none found
> #
> (--) NV(0): CRTC 0 is currently programmed for DFP
> #
> (II) NV(0): Using DFP on CRTC 0
> #
> (--) NV(0): Panel size is 1280 x 1024
> #
> (II) NV(0): NOTE: This driver cannot reconfigure the BIOS-programmed size.
> #
> (II) NV(0): These dimensions will be used as the panel size for mode 
> validation.
> 
> Does the monitor have some BIOS of its own? The panel size is
> obviously wrong, but it seems as though nv won't be able to change
> that...
> 
> If 1280x1024 is all nv can do, i'll keep using it (in full mode, not
> 4:3) and i guess that wraps it up as far as having nv to fallback to.
> Which list can i pester about this? I tried X's but couldn't even
> subscribe.
> 
> Thanks,
> Nuno Magalhֳ£es
> 
> [0] http://pastebin.com/m680093f9
> 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Graphics 1920x1440, monitor 1680x1050, nv 1280x1024.

[Felix Miata]

On 2009/05/05 10:54 (GMT+0100) Nuno Magalhães composed:

> Does the monitor have some BIOS of its own? The panel size is
> obviously wrong, but it seems as though nv won't be able to change
> that...
> 
> If 1280x1024 is all nv can do, i'll keep using it (in full mode, not
> 4:3) and i guess that wraps it up as far as having nv to fallback to.
> Which list can i pester about this? I tried X's but couldn't even
> subscribe.

I know nv can run 1920x1200, because I did it a year ago with a GeForce 6200
[1]. Thus, I cannot imagine it incapable of running the more common
1680x1050. Maybe you need to put a DisplaySize line in xorg.conf to get the
right size?

[1] http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127317
-- 
"A fool gives full vent to his anger, but a wise man
keeps himself under control."   Proverbs 29:11 NIV

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409

Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Graphics 1920x1440, monitor 1680x1050, nv 1280x1024.

[Nuno Magalhães]

Fiddling with the monitor menu i came across this:

DIV
1280x1024
64KHz 60Hz

...that'll be useful for a modeline i guess - how can i make one?
It does have a menu for Full/4:3, i changed to 4:3., which stole
screen-area, i now have two black stripes. Even if restarting X will
give me the full res i don't think it's work it, but at least i'll be
getting somewhere.

Also, my BIOS has nothing related to the video settings, at least not
related to the resolution.

Are there any programs (for amd64) to read the EDID?

Looking at the log[0], i saw this:

#
(II) NV(0): Probing for EDID on I2C bus A...
#
(II) NV(0): I2C device "DDC:E-EDID segment register" registered at address 0x60.
#
(II) NV(0): I2C device "DDC:ddc2" registered at address 0xA0.
#
(II) NV(0):   ... none found
#
(II) NV(0): Probing for EDID on I2C bus B...
#
(II) NV(0):   ... none found
#
(--) NV(0): CRTC 0 is currently programmed for DFP
#
(II) NV(0): Using DFP on CRTC 0
#
(--) NV(0): Panel size is 1280 x 1024
#
(II) NV(0): NOTE: This driver cannot reconfigure the BIOS-programmed size.
#
(II) NV(0): These dimensions will be used as the panel size for mode validation.

Does the monitor have some BIOS of its own? The panel size is
obviously wrong, but it seems as though nv won't be able to change
that...

If 1280x1024 is all nv can do, i'll keep using it (in full mode, not
4:3) and i guess that wraps it up as far as having nv to fallback to.
Which list can i pester about this? I tried X's but couldn't even
subscribe.

Thanks,
Nuno Magalhães

[0] http://pastebin.com/m680093f9

-- 
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  ascii-rubanda kampajno - kontraŭ html-a retpoŝto


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Graphics 1920x1440, monitor 1680x1050, nv 1280x1024.

[Micha Feigin]

On Tue, 5 May 2009 00:31:32 -0600
Dave Thayer  wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 08:20:36PM +0100, Nuno Magalhדes wrote:
> > > Yeah i came across that but i'd assume DVI to be superior (i.e. more
> > > recent, hence better) than VGA... Also, could the monitor's EDID be
> > > reporting erroneous values?
> > 
> > I switched to VGA to give it a try, these are the results:
> > 
> > DVI:
> > # xrandr
> > Screen 0: minimum 640 x 480, current 1280 x 1024, maximum 1280 x 1024
> > default connected 1280x1024+0+0 0mm x 0mm
> >1280x1024  60.0*
> >1280x960   60.0
> >1152x864   60.0
> >1024x768   60.0
> >800x60060.0 56.0
> >640x48060.0
> > 
> > RGB:
> > # xrandr
> > Screen 0: minimum 320 x 240, current 800 x 600, maximum 800 x 600
> > default connected 800x600+0+0 0mm x 0mm
> >800x60060.0*56.0
> >640x48060.0
> >400x30060.0 56.0
> >320x24060.0
> > 
> 
> These look like the basic VESA resolutions. I wonder if you could
> force any additional resolutions by adding custom modelines to your
> xorg.conf file. 
> 
> dt
> 

Any chance that it's a wide screen that has an option in the menu to either
automatically or manually adjust to a standard 3:4 resolution?

I've got a samsung syncmaster and on this particular monitor at least if I set
menu->setup->image size
to auto instead of wide (so that it gives a non-stretched screen for 3:4
resolutions) the edid comes out wrong and X doesn't recognize the high
resolutions. I don't recall what is the default behavior with this monitor
though.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Graphics 1920x1440, monitor 1680x1050, nv 1280x1024.

[Dave Thayer]

On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 08:20:36PM +0100, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
> > Yeah i came across that but i'd assume DVI to be superior (i.e. more
> > recent, hence better) than VGA... Also, could the monitor's EDID be
> > reporting erroneous values?
> 
> I switched to VGA to give it a try, these are the results:
> 
> DVI:
> # xrandr
> Screen 0: minimum 640 x 480, current 1280 x 1024, maximum 1280 x 1024
> default connected 1280x1024+0+0 0mm x 0mm
>1280x1024  60.0*
>1280x960   60.0
>1152x864   60.0
>1024x768   60.0
>800x60060.0 56.0
>640x48060.0
> 
> RGB:
> # xrandr
> Screen 0: minimum 320 x 240, current 800 x 600, maximum 800 x 600
> default connected 800x600+0+0 0mm x 0mm
>800x60060.0*56.0
>640x48060.0
>400x30060.0 56.0
>320x24060.0
> 

These look like the basic VESA resolutions. I wonder if you could
force any additional resolutions by adding custom modelines to your
xorg.conf file. 

dt

-- 
Dave Thayer   | Whenever you read a good book, it's like the 
Denver, Colorado USA  | author is right there, in the room talking to 
d...@thayer-boyle.com | you, which is why I don't like to read 
  | good books. - Jack Handey "Deep Thoughts"


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Graphics 1920x1440, monitor 1680x1050, nv 1280x1024.

[Nuno Magalhães]

> Yeah i came across that but i'd assume DVI to be superior (i.e. more
> recent, hence better) than VGA... Also, could the monitor's EDID be
> reporting erroneous values?

I switched to VGA to give it a try, these are the results:

DVI:
# xrandr
Screen 0: minimum 640 x 480, current 1280 x 1024, maximum 1280 x 1024
default connected 1280x1024+0+0 0mm x 0mm
   1280x1024  60.0*
   1280x960   60.0
   1152x864   60.0
   1024x768   60.0
   800x60060.0 56.0
   640x48060.0

RGB:
# xrandr
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 240, current 800 x 600, maximum 800 x 600
default connected 800x600+0+0 0mm x 0mm
   800x60060.0*56.0
   640x48060.0
   400x30060.0 56.0
   320x24060.0

Although, these are the drivers i have:
xserver-xorg-video-ark (don't know why i have this one anyway)
xserver-xorg-video-fbdev
xserver-xorg-video-nv
xserver-xorg-video-vmware

Would installing any other xserver-xorg-video-* make a difference?

-- 
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  ascii-rubanda kampajno - kontraŭ html-a retpoŝto


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Graphics 1920x1440, monitor 1680x1050, nv 1280x1024.

[Nuno Magalhães]

Andrei Popescu:
> How about posting Xorg.0.log

I had it linked in the previous post's pastebin links, maybe they're
outdated by now. I've pasted Xorg.0.log [0] and xorg.conf [1] (the old
one, the new one's empty except for the mouse i tweaked).

Dave Thayer:
> There is a long-standing bug in the nv driver which limits it to
> whatever the BIOS reports. Unfortunately it won't get fixed[1].

So guess maybe a BIOS update...?

> According to our friends over at redhat, switching to an analog VGA
> cable might help things [2].

Yeah i came across that but i'd assume DVI to be superior (i.e. more
recent, hence better) than VGA... Also, could the monitor's EDID be
reporting erroneous values?


Thanks!

Nuno Magalhães

[0] http://pastebin.com/m680093f9
[1] http://pastebin.com/m31008e02

-- 
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  ascii-rubanda kampajno - kontraŭ html-a retpoŝto


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Graphics 1920x1440, monitor 1680x1050, nv 1280x1024.

[Dave Thayer]

On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 01:24:57PM +0100, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
> Again on X resolutions, recently dist-upgraded unstable on amd64. Are
> there any X gurus out there?
> 
> - Graphics card: NVIDIA GeForce 6150 (C51PV chipset) on an Asus
> M2NPV-VM, having max 1920x1440 (@75Hz) on VGA[1].
> - Monitor: Asus VW222U, max 1680x1050[2].
> - Driver: nv.
> 
> # xrandr
> Screen 0: minimum 640x480, current 1280x1024, maximum 1280x1024
> 
> Last time i groaned about this i couldn't find documentation on nv's
> supported resolutions. Also, i'm using DVI-D, not VGA (the mb has
> both), and i'm not sure about what type or frequency does it
> support[3]. I'd assume DVI would be better/support higher resolutions
> than VGA too...

There is a long-standing bug in the nv driver which limits it to
whatever the BIOS reports. Unfortunately it won't get fixed[1].

According to our friends over at redhat, switching to an analog VGA 
cable might help things [2]. 

[1] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3654
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469224

HTH
dt
-- 
Dave Thayer   | Whenever you read a good book, it's like the 
Denver, Colorado USA  | author is right there, in the room talking to 
d...@thayer-boyle.com | you, which is why I don't like to read 
  | good books. - Jack Handey "Deep Thoughts"


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Graphics 1920x1440, monitor 1680x1050, nv 1280x1024.

[Andrei Popescu]

On Fri,24.Apr.09, 13:24:57, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
 
> Do any of you have any suggestions? Constructive criticism? Good RTFM
> links? Nice coffee?

How about posting Xorg.0.log

Regards,
Andrei
-- 
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature