Re: Is redeclipse really non-free?

2012-08-26 Thread Camaleón 
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 14:22:06 -0700, Miga wrote:

(please, no html posts, thanks)

 Hey there everybody, this is my first time posting to Debian mailing
 lists, so hopefully I'm posting this to the correct one.
 
 Can anybody explain why redeclipse is in contrib and redeclipse-data is
 in non-free? From what I know, redeclipse-data isn't non-free (uses
 licenses like CC-BY, CC-BY-SA and OFL), so why is it in non-free? Is it
 being in non-free a mistake?

It was discussed once ago in debian-legal mailing list:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2011/03/msg00074.html

But things could have changed since that, I would ask the game developers 
about the current license status of their project.

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/k1d0at$vnf$5...@ger.gmane.org

Re: Is redeclipse really non-free?

2012-08-25 Thread John Hasler 
The OFL (Open Font License) is incompatible with the DFSG.
-- 
John Hasler


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87vcg6k4pj@thumper.dhh.gt.org

Re: Is redeclipse really non-free?

2012-08-25 Thread Brian 
On Sat 25 Aug 2012 at 14:22:06 -0700, Miga wrote:

 Basically what I'm asking is, can somebody help me confirm that
 redeclipse-data is actually non-free? If so, what's making it non-free?

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651752


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120825220900.GA27914@desktop

Re: Is redeclipse really non-free?

2012-08-25 Thread Bob Proulx 
Brian wrote:
 Miga wrote:
  Basically what I'm asking is, can somebody help me confirm that
  redeclipse-data is actually non-free? If so, what's making it non-free?
 
 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651752

Stated in that ITP log:
 This will go in non-free due to missing sources (and not due to licensing).

Bob


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature