Re: NetHack meets the 21st century (was Re: Email programs that work.)
Ron Johnson wrote: nethack-x11 is pane-based, a perfect mixture of graphics and keyboard controls. Nah, that's Angband. :) -- Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream? PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | And dream I do... ---+- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: NetHack meets the 21st century (was Re: Email programs that work.)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Steve Lamb wrote: Ron Johnson wrote: nethack-x11 is pane-based, a perfect mixture of graphics and keyboard controls. Nah, that's Angband. :) Maybe Angband does what nethack-x11 does, but nh-x11 is *definitely* picture-based. - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Is common sense really valid? For example, it is common sense to white-power racists that whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins are mud people. However, that common sense is obviously wrong. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE8YPlS9HxQb37XmcRAnyMAJ9POTj9tq00N4RMl4bjtrzvWub3UQCfXqRe oXYO0CMKtB+CuKnZkOx2d94= =A3Hk -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NetHack meets the 21st century (was Re: Email programs that work.)
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 05:55:24AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Rippl wrote: On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 01:50:09PM -0500, Mumia W. wrote: On 08/26/2006 11:10 AM, s. keeling wrote: Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: s. keeling wrote: [snip] live. But I digress. I have to get back to my nethack session (another non-GUI leftover from the 90s). nethack-x11 is pane-based, a perfect mixture of graphics and keyboard controls. Oh, don't get me started. I tried some of the pane based versions, but somehow I only get the full enjoyment from the pure ASCII (with colour) version. There is nothing like a red @ (werewolf) creeping up to you - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Is common sense really valid? For example, it is common sense to white-power racists that whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins are mud people. However, that common sense is obviously wrong. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE8XocS9HxQb37XmcRAgiWAKDFghYES6dtPMT8cbUDOZVa/1CrDwCeK6Kv THy+xzO0p4opC1CuD34VJS8= =WN3f -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Andreas Rippl -- GPG messages preferred Key-ID: 0x81073379 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: NetHack meets the 21st century (was Re: Email programs that work.)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Rippl wrote: On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 05:55:24AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: Andreas Rippl wrote: On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 01:50:09PM -0500, Mumia W. wrote: On 08/26/2006 11:10 AM, s. keeling wrote: Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: s. keeling wrote: [snip] live. But I digress. I have to get back to my nethack session (another non-GUI leftover from the 90s). nethack-x11 is pane-based, a perfect mixture of graphics and keyboard controls. Oh, don't get me started. I tried some of the pane based versions, but somehow I only get the full enjoyment from the pure ASCII (with colour) version. There is nothing like a red @ (werewolf) creeping up to you I tried nethack-gnome but did not like it. Too GUI-fied. The Win32 version is also like that. - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Is common sense really valid? For example, it is common sense to white-power racists that whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins are mud people. However, that common sense is obviously wrong. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE8jZcS9HxQb37XmcRAp8PAKCmCWivC8rVesX9s3nAa5E26SaiiwCfTKNy k8l+2na1/V4XfppuOEREnJo= =U/b0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
