Re: debian-cd baking process

2024-02-13 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 06:12:47PM +0100, Kevin Price wrote:
>Dear Steve:
>
>Am 18.01.24 um 00:37 schrieb Steve McIntyre:
>> Kevin Price wrote:
>>> I'm not quite sure where to address this to,
>
>> Argh, that's my code in the debian-cd package. "reportbug debian-cd"
>> should do the right thing...
>
>Thank you for your help, I should have known. So I've now filed
>https://bugs.debian.org/1063858 . Please accept my apology for being
>slow in doing that.

No worries, thanks for prodding. :-)

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
'There is some grim amusement in watching Pence try to run the typical
 "politician in the middle of a natural disaster" playbook, however
 incompetently, while Trump scribbles all over it in crayon and eats some
 of the pages.'   -- Russ Allbery



Re: debian-cd baking process

2024-02-13 Thread Kevin Price
Dear Steve:

Am 18.01.24 um 00:37 schrieb Steve McIntyre:
> Kevin Price wrote:
>> I'm not quite sure where to address this to,

> Argh, that's my code in the debian-cd package. "reportbug debian-cd"
> should do the right thing...

Thank you for your help, I should have known. So I've now filed
https://bugs.debian.org/1063858 . Please accept my apology for being
slow in doing that.

Cheers
-- 
Kevin Price



Re: debian-cd baking process

2024-01-17 Thread Steve McIntyre
Hi Kevin!

Kevin Price wrote:
>
>I'm not quite sure where to address this to, but I'm certain this is a
>bug: If you download debian installer media, for instance
>debian-12.4.0-amd64-DLBD-2.iso, they prominenty include the files
>"README.txt" and "README.html". Those presumably somehow auto-generated
>README files say, in the case of former example:
>
>"this disc is number 2 of a set of 1 discs"
>
>Which is obviously false.
>
>Could anyone please help me find where to file this bug to? Any ideas
>much appreciated. Maybe there's a bug already that I didn't find.

Argh, that's my code in the debian-cd package. "reportbug debian-cd"
should do the right thing...

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
Can't keep my eyes from the circling sky,
Tongue-tied & twisted, Just an earth-bound misfit, I...



Re: debian-cd baking process

2024-01-17 Thread Michael Kjörling
On 17 Jan 2024 18:00 +0100, from k...@osnanet.de (Kevin Price):
> Could anyone please help me find where to file this bug to? Any ideas
> much appreciated. Maybe there's a bug already that I didn't find.

The canonical starting point is https://bugs.debian.org

Notably for this situation, near the bottom of that page is a link to
a list of pseudo-packages, which in turn includes "cdimage.debian.org
— CD Image issues" which looks right for this.

So you would file a bug with a

Package: cdimage.debian.org

The corresponding list of currently outstanding bugs is viewable
through https://bugs.debian.org/cdimage.debian.org

Also, while obviously it's far, far better to take care to file a bug
against the correct package, I would go out on a limb here and say
that it's not a disaster if, _despite your best efforts_, it ends up
being filed against the wrong package or pseudo-package. Bugs _can_ be
reassigned to different packages if they are filed against the wrong
package by mistake.

The above is NOT meant to imply endorsement of sloppy bug filing; _do_
your best to find the correct package to report the bug against, but
_don't_ lose sleep over a slim chance that you might end up reporting
it against the wrong package. Someone will almost certainly fix it if
you get it wrong; it might just take longer to get the bug fixed,
especially for a low-priority bug like I would at first glance
consider the one you're talking about in this thread.

-- 
Michael Kjörling  https://michael.kjorling.se
“Remember when, on the Internet, nobody cared that you were a dog?”