Re: xcdroast Invalid readcd version -unknown- found
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 00:44 +0100, csanyipal wrote: I upgraded from Sarge to Etch. :) Now I try to run Xcdroast (from an xterm), but get an error message: -- ** (xcdroast:9724): WARNING **: Invalid readcd version -unknown- found. Expecting at least version 1.1.0 Start xcdroast with the -n option to override (not recommended!) -- apt-cache search readcd don't give me a result. What can I do to solve this problem? Sounds like there are still a few problems with the transition from cdrecord to wodim. Xcdroast should use readom (in the wodim package) instead of readcd. Please file a bug report. As a temporary work around, install the cdrecord dummy package and see if that makes Xcdroast happy. -- Cheers, Sven Arvidsson http://www.whiz.se PGP Key ID 760BDD22 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: xcdroast Invalid readcd version -unknown- found
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 10:41:54AM +0100, Sven Arvidsson wrote: -- ** (xcdroast:9724): WARNING **: Invalid readcd version -unknown- found. Expecting at least version 1.1.0 Start xcdroast with the -n option to override (not recommended!) -- Sounds like there are still a few problems with the transition from cdrecord to wodim. Xcdroast should use readom (in the wodim package) instead of readcd. Please file a bug report. Sorry, but how can I fill a bug report easily? As a temporary work around, install the cdrecord dummy package and see if that makes Xcdroast happy. It was installed cdrecord dummy package but still get the abowe error message. -- Regards, Paul Csányi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast Invalid readcd version -unknown- found
On pon, 2007-01-08 at 12:27 +0100, csanyipal wrote: Sorry, but how can I fill a bug report easily? Use reportbug. -- [] BorgDOS 6.0i: FORMAT C: [Y/y]...Resistance [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] is futile. [ http://epsilon.eu.org/ ] [] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast Invalid readcd version -unknown- found
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 12:44:40AM +0100, csanyipal wrote: Hello! I upgraded from Sarge to Etch. :) Now I try to run Xcdroast (from an xterm), but get an error message: -- ** (xcdroast:9724): WARNING **: Invalid readcd version -unknown- found. Expecting at least version 1.1.0 Start xcdroast with the -n option to override (not recommended!) -- apt-cache search readcd don't give me a result. What can I do to solve this problem? Hi Paul, Ensure that you have all the dependancies installed? apt-cache search only searches the package names and descriptions For packages you have installed, you need dpkg -L readcd For packages you do not have installed you need apt-file. Doug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XCDRoast etch not working......
M-L wrote: I get this error message when invoking XCDRoast:- ** (xcdroast:7879): WARNING **: Invalid mkisofs version -unknown- found. Expecting at least version 1.15a17 Start xcdroast with the -n option to override (not recommended!) It appears I have this version of mkisofs installed:- Architecture: i386 Source: cdrtools Version: 4:2.01+01a03-5 Is XCDRoast going to work again sometime in the future, or should I just remove it? TIA, Charlie Hi Charlie, xcdroast works for me in Etch. Here's how: 1. Make sure you have installed the wodim package 2. make a symlink from /usr/bin/readom to /usr/bin/readcd 3. You need to run xcdroast as root the first time (use the -n switch) and save the setup configuration. Then run as a normal user and also save the setup configuration. 4. That's it. You can also try k3b Cheers, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: xcdroast replacement?
Здравствуйте, GalbraithP. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Подпишите меня на спам -- С уважением, victim mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Xcdroast em 800x600
Você pode usar uma tela virtual de 1024x768. O chato será arrastar a tela, mas enfim... -- Eduardo Costa Lisboa
Re: xcdroast et cdrecord
Francois a écrit : Moralité, si on commence à la main, il faut finir à la main... F. Euhhh on parle bien d'informatique là !!! ;) Bon ok je sors !!! -- Faire reagir les cons, c ce ki demande le + d'intelligence! -- Pensez à lire la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Pensez à rajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast et cdrecord
Avec ATAPI ça ne marche pas mieux: ce sont d'autres messages d'erreur, et en utilisant cdrecord directement, ça ne donnait rien non plus. La commande générée par xcdroast est CDRECORD dev= ATAPI:0,1,0 gracetime=2 fs=4096k -v -useinfo speed=10 -dummy -eject -multi -pad -data /tmp/track_test-01.iso Le message d'erreur sont ci-dessous Merci pour toute indication François scsidev: 'ATAPI:0,1,0' devname: 'ATAPI' scsibus: 0 target: 1 lun: 0 Warning: Using ATA Packet interface. Warning: The related Linux kernel interface code seems to be unmaintained. Warning: There is absolutely NO DMA, operations thus are slow. SCSI buffer size: 64512 Cdrecord-Clone 2.01.01a01 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2004 Jörg Schilling cdrecord: Drive does not support TAO recording. NOTE: this version of cdrecord is an inofficial (modified) release of cdrecord cdrecord: Illegal write mode for this drive. and thus may have bugs that are not present in the original version.
Re: xcdroast et cdrecord
Plus tard En fait après pas mal d'essais, c'est l'option -data générée par xcdroast dans la ligne de commande à cdrecord qui pose problème, peut-être parce que je veux des cd multi sessions. S'il y a des spécialistes de xcdroast, je les remercie de m'indiquer comment faire pour que xcdroast mette -xa (ou ne mette rien) comme mode d'enregistrement François
Re: xcdroast et cdrecord
On Dim 1 mai 2005 16:59, Francois a écrit : Plus tard En fait après pas mal d'essais, c'est l'option -data générée par xcdroast dans la ligne de commande à cdrecord qui pose problème, peut-être parce que je veux des cd multi sessions. S'il y a des spécialistes de xcdroast, je les remercie de m'indiquer comment faire pour que xcdroast mette -xa (ou ne mette rien) comme mode d'enregistrement François Je ne répond pas à la question... Néanmoins, tu ferais peut-être bien de tester graveman à la place de xcdroast si tu es en sarge ou en sid Le seul hic que je rencontre avec graveman (par rapport à tous les avantages qu'il a face à xcdroast) est qu'il passe forcément par un iso avant de graver... A+ -- Jean-Yves LENHOF -- Pensez à lire la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Pensez à rajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast et cdrecord
Et finalement, si je grave un cd multisession avec xcdroast en commençant avec un cd vide, ça marche Mes problèmes venaient de ce que l'autre qui donnait un message d'erreur, je l'avais commencé en ligne de commande avec mkisofs -o test.raw -R -C x,y /chemin/SourceDonnées puis cdrecord speed=2 dev=ATA:1,1,0 -multi test.raw ... etc selon les expli README.multi et que -multi à générer un mode d'enregistrement différent de mode 1. Ensuite xcdroast ne pouvait pas reproduire... Moralité, si on commence à la main, il faut finir à la main... F.
RE: xcdroast et cdrecord
cdrecord -v speed=2 dev=ATAPI:1,1,0 -multi track-04.iso -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Francois Envoyé : samedi 30 avril 2005 13:36 À : debian-user-french@lists.debian.org Objet : xcdroast et cdrecord Bonjour Avec un noyau 2.6.9, je voudrais utiliser xcdroast pour graver des cd. Créer des sessions suplémentaires avec xcdroast fonctionne, mais la gravure ne marche pas. Par contre je peux graver les sessions créées par xcdroast depuis la ligne de commande: cdrecord -v speed=2 dev=ATA:1,1,0 -multi track-04.iso Depuis xcdroast, la commande est la suivante CDRECORD dev= ATA:1,1,0 gracetime=2 fs=4096k -v -useinfo speed=2 -eject -multi -data /tmp/track-05.iso Et le message d'erreur est Blocks total: 359849 Blocks current: 324291 Blocks remaining: 323987 Starting to write CD/DVD at speed 2 in real TAO mode for multi session. Waiting for reader process to fill input buffer ... input buffer ready. Performing OPC... Starting new track at sector: 35558 cdrecord: Success. write_g1: scsi sendcmd: no error CDB: 2A 00 00 00 8A E6 00 00 1F 00 status: 0x2 (CHECK CONDITION) Sense Bytes: 70 00 05 00 00 00 00 12 00 00 00 00 24 00 00 00 Sense Key: 0x5 Illegal Request, Segment 0 Sense Code: 0x24 Qual 0x00 (invalid field in cdb) Fru 0x0 Sense flags: Blk 0 (not valid) resid: 63488 cmd finished after 0.012s timeout 40s cdrecord: A write error occured. cdrecord: Please properly read the error message above. write track data: error after 0 bytes Writing time: 14.301s Average write speed 0.8x. Fixating... Fixating time:0.003s cdrecord: fifo had 10 puts and 1 gets. cdrecord: fifo was 0 times empty and 0 times full, min fill was 100%. es empty and 0 times full, min fill was 100%. D'après man cdroast ce serait une question de DMA parce que la taille de la pile FIFO est définnie, mais je suis un peu perdu, là... Le noyau que j'utilise est le package debian pour processeur AMD kernel-image-2.6.9-2-K7_2.6.9-5_i386.deb. Merci pour toute suggestion François -- Pensez à lire la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Pensez à rajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast y kernel 2.6.8
Omar Murray wrote: Hola: Cuando crei que habia tocado el cielo con las manos al instalar el kernel 2.6.8, intento grabar un cd con mi bien querido xcdroast y miren lo que me pasa : cdrecord: Warning: Running on Linux-2.6.8 cdrecord: There are unsettled issues with Linux-2.5 and newer. cdrecord: If you have unexpected problems, please try Linux-2.4 or Solaris. cdrecord: Warning: Linux-2.6.8 introduced incompatible interface changes. Alguna sugerencia ? Habra algun otro programita que me sirva para grabar cd's tipo xcdroast, que pueda usar con entorno grafico en gnome ? Se de la existencia de k3b, pero tengo entendido que es basicamente para kde, no ? Chas gracias... gtoaster -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast para DVDs
A lo primero: k3b Para la segunda pregunta puedes usar: dvdrecord ( para DVD-R / DVD-RW ) growisofs ( DVD+R/W / DVD-R/W ), estos 2 están en el paquete: dvd+rw-tools. y cdrecord-ProDVD ( este no sé si es para DVD+R / DVD-R ... ), puedes encontrar fácilmente los fuentes por la red. On Apr 7, 2005 4:26 PM, Luciano Andino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lista, quise probar con este programa para quemar unos dvds pero me pide un paquete para los dvd que no he encontrado en los repositorios de debian, supongo que no es software libre? También vi que existe el Nero para Linux (gratuito) pero al momento de bajarlo me pedía una regristración... Mi preguntas son: 1) Qué software con frontend utilizan ustedes? k3b? 2) También preciso poder quemar desde linea de comandos... es decir... hacer un script llamado backup que quién lo ejecute al final del dia haga un tar de /home y vaya a parar a ese DVD (regrabable). Gracias por los consejos, saludos... Luciano -- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web site: http://odf.galeon.com/
Re: xcdroast y kernel 2.6.8
Hola: Cuando crei que habia tocado el cielo con las manos al instalar el kernel 2.6.8, intento grabar un cd con mi bien querido xcdroast y miren lo que me pasa : cdrecord: Warning: Running on Linux-2.6.8 cdrecord: There are unsettled issues with Linux-2.5 and newer. cdrecord: If you have unexpected problems, please try Linux-2.4 or Solaris. cdrecord: Warning: Linux-2.6.8 introduced incompatible interface changes. Alguna sugerencia ? Habra algun otro programita que me sirva para grabar cd's tipo xcdroast, que pueda usar con entorno grafico en gnome ? Se de la existencia de k3b, pero tengo entendido que es basicamente para kde, no ? Lo del kernel 2.6.8 y los problemas que da para grabar CD's son cosa conocida. Instalate el kernel 2.6.11, disponible de kernel.org Para grabar CD's tienes k3b (que aunque use QT funciona igual en gnome). Tambien tienes gcombust. Si quieres algo más sencillo y fácil de usar tienes nautilus-burn y graveman (este último me gusto mucho por lo sencillo que es, trukulo lo ha empaquetado para debian y está disponible en su web (busca en google, ahora no la recuerdo)) Saludos Aritz Beraza [Rei] -- Aritz Beraza Garayalde [Rei] ___ [ WWW ] http://evangelion.homelinux.net [jabber] rei[en]bulmalug.net
Re: XCDROAST y K3B
Yo uso el XCDROAST, como no me gusta para nada KDE, uso este programa. No sé si ya te diste cuenta, pero cuando vás a grabar un CD con multisessión el XCDROAST dice que tenés menos espacio libre. Tal vez sea así en por defecto, o sea: este seria el comportamento normal del cdrecord. Nunca me puse a estudiar este tema, puedo grabar sin problemas usando el XCDROAST. Lo que ha cambiado fue lo siguiente: antes usaba kernel 2.4.26 y emulación scsi. Ahora uso kernel 2.6.8.1 y no tengo emulación scsi. Vá todo de maravilla. Suerte, Miguel D. On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:31:18 +0100 Josep Ysern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Antes he iniciado el hilo sobre el kernel 2.6.10 y k3b. Ahora quería hacer un par de comentarios. Con el kernel 2.6.8, que es el que tengo, acabo de grabar un cd multisesión con xcdroast, como usuario normal, tan ricamente. Con K3B no puedo. Lo que sí he podido ahora con el k3B es grabar, siendo root, un cd multisesión. Eso sí: el cd que he usado esta vez estaba vacío, mientras que los otros con los que había probado tenían casi 700 Mb. ¿Puede ser éste el motivo por el que me pedía que lo borrara antes, aunque indicara cd multisesión? ¿Hay un espacio límite para que el programa pueda actuar como multisesión? ¿Tenéis idea de cuál es? Lo que no acabo de entender es, si todo, en el fondo, es un CDRECORD, ¿por qué el k3b me exige ser root y el xcdrecord no? En fin, la verdad es que nunca me he sentido satisfecho del todo con el tema de las grabaciones: pasé al k3b porque me dio problemas el gtoaster -creo que se llamaba-; ahora me los da el k3b y, de momento, paso al xcdroast... Cordialmente, Josep -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XCDROAST y K3B
Josep Ysern escribió: Antes he iniciado el hilo sobre el kernel 2.6.10 y k3b. Ahora quería hacer un par de comentarios. Con el kernel 2.6.8, que es el que tengo, acabo de grabar un cd multisesión con xcdroast, como usuario normal, tan ricamente. Con K3B no puedo. Lo que sí he podido ahora con el k3B es grabar, siendo root, un cd multisesión. Eso sí: el cd que he usado esta vez estaba vacío, mientras que los otros con los que había probado tenían casi 700 Mb. ¿Puede ser éste el motivo por el que me pedía que lo borrara antes, aunque indicara cd multisesión? ¿Hay un espacio límite para que el programa pueda actuar como multisesión? ¿Tenéis idea de cuál es? Lo que no acabo de entender es, si todo, en el fondo, es un CDRECORD, ¿por qué el k3b me exige ser root y el xcdrecord no? En fin, la verdad es que nunca me he sentido satisfecho del todo con el tema de las grabaciones: pasé al k3b porque me dio problemas el gtoaster -creo que se llamaba-; ahora me los da el k3b y, de momento, paso al xcdroast... Cordialmente, Josep Problemas en esa vesión que usas del k3b, actualizala y todo arreglado. Un saludo.
Re: xcdroast
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 18:15:06 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 08:58:30AM -0500, Tom Allison wrote: [snip] I was able to get the scsi emulation turned back on easily enough. And it did burn one CD, the one I needed. But now I need to access the stupid thing and I have no idea which device it really is. sr1 (according to dmesg) isn't it hdc isn't it sg0 isn't it sg1 isn't it On my system, using scsi emulation on a woody system with a 2.4.18 kernel, it's /dev/sg0 to burn, /dev/scd0 to mount and read. Don't really understand the ins and outs of scsi emulation. Just got that from a howto. With the 2.6.x kernels (don't recall which version) the SCSI emulation for CD writing was deprecated in favor of direct ATA command (someone correct me if i'm wrong). Now add to this a security issue corrected with kernel 2.6.8 (non root user could overwrite the CD firmware) and cdrecord upstream developer attitude, you have a pretty messy situation. My suggestion is, with the latest Debian cdrecord version and a 2.6.8 or greater kernel, to disable scsi-emulation and manually configure the device of Xcdroast with the standard ide device name (something like /dev/hdX) or using the cdrecord naming scheme but after running cdrecord dev=ATA: -scanbus (Xcdroast seems to choose automatically the ATAPI transport instead of ATA)... Instead, if you're running Gnome with the udev/hal stuff and gnome-volume-manager you only need to put a blank CD in the driver and Nautilus CD/DVD Creator window should appear, now you only need to drag the files to be burned on that window and select from the file menu Write to CD... Andrea P.S. with kernel 2.4.18 your only choice is to use the scsi-emulation, but the parent was having problems with 2.6.8 =) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast
On Friday, 31.12.2004 at 08:03 -0500, Tom Allison wrote: I'm using the Kernel 2.6.8 I do not have SCSI emulation configured for this because I was under the impression that it was no longer required for the 2.6 kernel. Not directly answering your question, but are you able to use k3b instead of xcdroast? I've never got around to sorting out SCSI emulation with my current setup and have failed to make cdrecord work properly manually. However, k3b is *very* good at examining your system setup and getting it all to work properly ... Dave. -- Dave Ewart - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] All email from me is now digitally signed, key from http://www.sungate.co.uk/ Fingerprint: AEC5 9360 0A35 7F66 66E9 82E4 9E10 6769 CD28 DA92 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: xcdroast
I'm using the Kernel 2.6.8 I do not have SCSI emulation configured for this because I was under the impression that it was no longer required for the 2.6 kernel. Hi, Got the same problem. When recompiling my 2.6 for the first time, i switched off SCSI emulation as it's said not to be needed any more. But xcdroast still _does_ need SCSI emulation. If you take a look on their site, you'll see : I had several reports that the last 2.6.x kernel broke CD-Writing using the ATAPI driver. Don't update if you want to continue to use X-CD-Roast, or switch back to SCSI-emulation. So there's no other solution ! You still use scsi emulation, even with 2.6, or yuou take smthg else to burn your CD. By the way, i post another question... What's the best way to burn CD's under Linux ? xcdroast used to be a must, but doesn't seem to be well maintained any more, does it ? Maybe it's still a must anyway ? Another way to burn is to do this manually, on console line. Not the easiest way, but a reliable one ! You can take a look at CD-Burning howto, it's not so difficult ! Good luck ! -- Marc Demlenne GPG : 768FA483 (http://pgp.mit.edu) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast
There is some problem with 2.6.8 and 2.6.8.1 kernels and cd/dvd burning. it's solved in 2.6.9... - Martin On Fri, 31 Dec 2004, Dave Ewart wrote: On Friday, 31.12.2004 at 08:03 -0500, Tom Allison wrote: I'm using the Kernel 2.6.8 I do not have SCSI emulation configured for this because I was under the impression that it was no longer required for the 2.6 kernel. Not directly answering your question, but are you able to use k3b instead of xcdroast? I've never got around to sorting out SCSI emulation with my current setup and have failed to make cdrecord work properly manually. However, k3b is *very* good at examining your system setup and getting it all to work properly ... Dave. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 the mental interface of Tom Allison told: I'm using the Kernel 2.6.8 [...] cdrecord: Drive does not support SAO recording. Supported modes: cdrecord: Illegal write mode for this drive. Drive buf size : 3317760 = 3240 KB Fireup xcdroast or cdrecord as root or switch to at least 2.6.9. AFAIK the Debian Kernel has patches for using cdrecord as user since 2.6.8-5? HTH Elimar -- .~. /V\ L I N U X /( )\ Phear the Penguin ^^-^^ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: xcdroast
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 the mental interface of Marc Demlenne told: I'm using the Kernel 2.6.8 I do not have SCSI emulation configured for this because I was under the impression that it was no longer required for the 2.6 kernel. Hi, Got the same problem. When recompiling my 2.6 for the first time, i switched off SCSI emulation as it's said not to be needed any more. But xcdroast still _does_ need SCSI emulation. If you take a look on their site, you'll see : No! xcdrecord _does_ need cdrecord. And cdrecord runs without SCSI emulation on 2.6. Elimar -- Never make anything simple and efficient when a way can be found to make it complex and wonderful ;-) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: xcdroast
No! xcdrecord _does_ need cdrecord. And cdrecord runs without SCSI emulation on 2.6. Maybe misunderstanding from mine ... But cdrecord runs perfectly well on command line with my 2.6 and without scsi emulation. XcdRoast doesn't, thought ! It claims for scsi emulation ! This problem is mentioned on their web site. What's the problem in that case ? Refering other answers, i'm still using an old 2.6.5. Not taken the time yet to upgrade to 2.6.10. -- Marc Demlenne GPG : 768FA483 (http://pgp.mit.edu) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast
Martin Fluch wrote: There is some problem with 2.6.8 and 2.6.8.1 kernels and cd/dvd burning. it's solved in 2.6.9... Unfortunately what is not solved in kernel 2.6.9 is my NVIDIA drivers won't install. why? I don't know.. But this is getting just silly. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 08:58:30 -0500, Tom Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marc Demlenne wrote: I'm using the Kernel 2.6.8 I do not have SCSI emulation configured for this because I was under the impression that it was no longer required for the 2.6 kernel. Hi, Got the same problem. When recompiling my 2.6 for the first time, i switched off SCSI emulation as it's said not to be needed any more. But xcdroast still _does_ need SCSI emulation. If you take a look on their site, you'll see : I had several reports that the last 2.6.x kernel broke CD-Writing using the ATAPI driver. Don't update if you want to continue to use X-CD-Roast, or switch back to SCSI-emulation. So there's no other solution ! You still use scsi emulation, even with 2.6, or yuou take smthg else to burn your CD. By the way, i post another question... What's the best way to burn CD's under Linux ? xcdroast used to be a must, but doesn't seem to be well maintained any more, does it ? Maybe it's still a must anyway ? Another way to burn is to do this manually, on console line. Not the easiest way, but a reliable one ! You can take a look at CD-Burning howto, it's not so difficult ! Good luck ! I was able to get the scsi emulation turned back on easily enough. And it did burn one CD, the one I needed. But now I need to access the stupid thing and I have no idea which device it really is. sr1 (according to dmesg) isn't it hdc isn't it sg0 isn't it sg1 isn't it I wish to god someone would come up with a better way of managing these devices. It's one thing to know what device branch it's under, it's another to have 169 possibilities under that branch with most of them dead ends. Very frustrated. I'll try upgrading to 2.6.9 and removing all the SCSI stuff for now. I need to access the disk more than anything right now. Is an IDE CD writer? If yes, try to put manually in xcdrecord config the device name using the cdrecord naming scheme that you find with cdrecord dev=ATA -scanbus or using the default IDE scheme, i.e. what usually you find on dmesg. Something like /dev/hdc if the writer is using the first channel (master?) of the second IDE interface. This brings up another point. How are you supposed to know what USB device is assigned to a USB storage device? My only solution is to plug it in and watch the logs. Are there any better alternatives? Are you using udev/hal? In this case you can put a rule in /etc/udev/rules.d, you should find the details in the udev documentation. Andrea -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004, Tom Allison wrote: Martin Fluch wrote: There is some problem with 2.6.8 and 2.6.8.1 kernels and cd/dvd burning. it's solved in 2.6.9... Unfortunately what is not solved in kernel 2.6.9 is my NVIDIA drivers won't install. why? I don't know.. But this is getting just silly. How about 2.6.10 or 2.6.7? - Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast
Andrea Vettorello wrote: On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 08:58:30 -0500, Tom Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marc Demlenne wrote: I'm using the Kernel 2.6.8 I do not have SCSI emulation configured for this because I was under the impression that it was no longer required for the 2.6 kernel. Hi, Got the same problem. When recompiling my 2.6 for the first time, i switched off SCSI emulation as it's said not to be needed any more. But xcdroast still _does_ need SCSI emulation. If you take a look on their site, you'll see : I had several reports that the last 2.6.x kernel broke CD-Writing using the ATAPI driver. Don't update if you want to continue to use X-CD-Roast, or switch back to SCSI-emulation. So there's no other solution ! You still use scsi emulation, even with 2.6, or yuou take smthg else to burn your CD. By the way, i post another question... What's the best way to burn CD's under Linux ? xcdroast used to be a must, but doesn't seem to be well maintained any more, does it ? Maybe it's still a must anyway ? Another way to burn is to do this manually, on console line. Not the easiest way, but a reliable one ! You can take a look at CD-Burning howto, it's not so difficult ! Good luck ! I was able to get the scsi emulation turned back on easily enough. And it did burn one CD, the one I needed. But now I need to access the stupid thing and I have no idea which device it really is. sr1 (according to dmesg) isn't it hdc isn't it sg0 isn't it sg1 isn't it I wish to god someone would come up with a better way of managing these devices. It's one thing to know what device branch it's under, it's another to have 169 possibilities under that branch with most of them dead ends. Very frustrated. I'll try upgrading to 2.6.9 and removing all the SCSI stuff for now. I need to access the disk more than anything right now. Is an IDE CD writer? If yes, try to put manually in xcdrecord config the device name using the cdrecord naming scheme that you find with cdrecord dev=ATA -scanbus or using the default IDE scheme, i.e. what usually you find on dmesg. Something like /dev/hdc if the writer is using the first channel (master?) of the second IDE interface. This brings up another point. How are you supposed to know what USB device is assigned to a USB storage device? My only solution is to plug it in and watch the logs. Are there any better alternatives? Are you using udev/hal? In this case you can put a rule in /etc/udev/rules.d, you should find the details in the udev documentation. Andrea I hate to admit this, but the /dev system is basically unusable to the newbie, or oldie for that matter. If you would like the Unix world without the hassle, take a look at Apple OSX 10.2 or OSX 10.3. I know, I know - but, it does work and work everytime. New device, just plug it in. It is not cheap! But, the time you save will generally equal out. And, you get the command line when you want to explore. Just another avenue. There is also Fedora Core 3, Mandrake, FreeBSD, OpenBSD. Fedora Core 3 and Mandrake are easiest with FreeBSD and OpenBSD presenting the same complications you are currently dealing with. Flexability and changeability come at a cost, mainly the time required to learn the system and its unique requirements. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast
On Dec 31 2004, Tom Allison wrote: Unfortunately what is not solved in kernel 2.6.9 is my NVIDIA drivers won't install. why? I don't know.. I know. Because you shouldn't have bought a card with binary only drivers in the first place. Doing that results in you having the problems that you're having now, with problems on each upgrade that you try. OTOH, try to disable the suid bit on cdrecord (dpkg-reconfigure -plow cdrecord) and see if helps with the kernel that you have. Hope this helps, Rogério. -- Learn to quote e-mails decently at: http://pub.tsn.dk/how-to-quote.php http://learn.to/quote http://www.xs4all.nl/~sbpoley/toppost.htm -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using udev rules to create nodes in /dev with deterministic names (was: Re: xcdroast)
On Dec 31 2004, Tom Allison wrote:
This brings up another point. How are you supposed to know what USB
device is assigned to a USB storage device? My only solution is to plug
it in and watch the logs. Are there any better alternatives?
Yes, use udev and make it create device files specific to your devices.
Here are the contents of my own udev rules, which create appropriate
files under the /dev hierarchy:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/udev/rules.d/10-local-udev.rules
#
# udev rules file made by Rogério Brito, mostly with information gathered with
# udevinfo -a -p /sys/class|block/bus/device
#
# USB Key Drive: Leading Driver Co.,LTD., USB Mass Storage Device
BUS=usb, SYSFS{idProduct}=2317, SYSFS{idVendor}=067b, NAME=usb/key%n,
SYMLINK=sda%n
# Printer: DeskJet 840C, BR1391S0WNKV
BUS=usb, SYSFS{idProduct}=0604, SYSFS{idVendor}=03f0, NAME=usb/lp%n,
SYMLINK=hp_lp
# iPod
BUS=ieee1394, SYSFS{model_name_kv}=iPod, NAME=ipod%n
# HD in Firewire Enclosure
BUS=scsi, SYSFS{vendor}=QUANTUM*, SYSFS{model}=FIREBALLlct15 30,
NAME=firewire%n
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Hope this helps, Rogério Brito.
--
Learn to quote e-mails decently at:
http://pub.tsn.dk/how-to-quote.php
http://learn.to/quote
http://www.xs4all.nl/~sbpoley/toppost.htm
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast
Rogério Brito wrote: On Dec 31 2004, Tom Allison wrote: Unfortunately what is not solved in kernel 2.6.9 is my NVIDIA drivers won't install. why? I don't know.. I know. Because you shouldn't have bought a card with binary only drivers in the first place. Doing that results in you having the problems that you're having now, with problems on each upgrade that you try. OTOH, try to disable the suid bit on cdrecord (dpkg-reconfigure -plow cdrecord) and see if helps with the kernel that you have. Guilty as charged on the video card. But it's one of the better ones I could find. In the future what would you recommend for 3D graphics cards? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast
Tom Allison wrote: Guilty as charged on the video card. But it's one of the better ones I could find. In the future what would you recommend for 3D graphics cards? Here's the dirty little secret of all the holier-than-thou don't use binary only drivers people out there There's no alternative. When it comes to consumer grade 3D cards you have 2 realistic choices. nVidia and ATI. Both of whom have proprietary Linux drivers(1). Of the two, nVidia's got the better Linux support at the moment(2). So in the future, nVidia and tell the people giving you guff to stick it where the sun don't shine. (1) There is a project to get ATI cards working with X without using ATIs proprietary drivers at http://dri.sourceforge.net/. However they're only up to the 9500 series. IE, a generation or two back. So if one wants to use the latest ATI cards one will need to use ATI's drivers. (2) Trust me on that one. I spent 3 months trying to get City of Heros working under Cedega. The factor that finally got it to work. Pulled my ATI 9800Pro, dropped in my old GeForce3 and was able to play no problems. Well, aside from low frame rates. -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls. ---+- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: xcdroast
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 08:58:30AM -0500, Tom Allison wrote: [snip] I was able to get the scsi emulation turned back on easily enough. And it did burn one CD, the one I needed. But now I need to access the stupid thing and I have no idea which device it really is. sr1 (according to dmesg) isn't it hdc isn't it sg0 isn't it sg1 isn't it On my system, using scsi emulation on a woody system with a 2.4.18 kernel, it's /dev/sg0 to burn, /dev/scd0 to mount and read. Don't really understand the ins and outs of scsi emulation. Just got that from a howto. HTH, GC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast and 2.6.9 in Debian
On November 24, 2004 14:21, H. S. wrote:
I discovered today that for some reason my xcdroast had been removed. I
was a bit surprised since I never removed it myself.
Anyhow, I reinstalled it using dselect and tried to configure it. During
installation I told it NOT to use SCSI emulation and NOT to make
/dev/sg? devices.
But now it takes *ages* to detect and configure my two drives. When I
ask it to rescan it just never sees my CDROM, only the CD-RW.
And I get these in my /var/log/syslog:
kernel: hdd: irq timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy }
kernel: hdd: irq timeout: error=0x00
kernel: hdd: ATAPI reset complete
.
.
.
and so on.
Then I tried by allowing it to use SCSI and allowing it to make /dev/sg?
devices. Same results with similar delays.
And if I try to eject the CD from CDROM, it takes another 5 or more
minutes to open the tray,maybe even longer.
Earlier I was running the 2.6.7 kernel. Now since a few days ago, I am
running 2.6.9 kernel (vanilla) on Sarge.
Is there a problem with xcdroast or am I missing something really
important. BTW, I do not have scsi emulation enabled, use ATAPI all the
time which seems to work with cdrecord.
There appears to be a problem with 2.6.8 and 2.6.9 kernels and cdrecord. This
problem is well documented -- see for example:
http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/3644
You either have to apply a patch or burn cd's as root. Some people are also
having trouble burning audio cd's where the cpu usage goes through the roof.
I would recommend downgrading to the 2.6.7 kernel again until these issues are
sorted out.
R. Pluschke
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast and 2.6.9 in Debian
Roy Pluschke wrote: There appears to be a problem with 2.6.8 and 2.6.9 kernels and cdrecord. This problem is well documented -- see for example: http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/3644 You either have to apply a patch or burn cd's as root. Some people are also having trouble burning audio cd's where the cpu usage goes through the roof. I would recommend downgrading to the 2.6.7 kernel again until these issues are sorted out. R. Pluschke I was thinking of going the SCSI route on my desktop (CD burner and U160 hard disk), would I still be affected by this problem? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast and 2.6.9 in Debian
Roy Pluschke wrote: There appears to be a problem with 2.6.8 and 2.6.9 kernels and cdrecord. This problem is well documented -- see for example: http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/3644 This bug existed in 2.6.8. It was fixed in 2.6.9. Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast and 2.6.9 in Debian
On November 24, 2004 18:13, Adam Aube wrote: Roy Pluschke wrote: There appears to be a problem with 2.6.8 and 2.6.9 kernels and cdrecord. This problem is well documented -- see for example: http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/3644 This bug existed in 2.6.8. It was fixed in 2.6.9. Adam Not in the debian kernel-source-2.6.9 package. Install my 2.6.7 kernel and it works fine, 2.6.8 and 2.6.9 don't (same kernel compile options and permission settings). I don't know about the pre-compiled kernels though. R. Pluschke -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast and 2.6.9 in Debian
Roy Pluschke wrote: On November 24, 2004 18:13, Adam Aube wrote: Roy Pluschke wrote: There appears to be a problem with 2.6.8 and 2.6.9 kernels and cdrecord. This problem is well documented -- see for example: http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/3644 This bug existed in 2.6.8. It was fixed in 2.6.9. Not in the debian kernel-source-2.6.9 package. Install my 2.6.7 kernel and it works fine, 2.6.8 and 2.6.9 don't (same kernel compile options and permission settings). I don't know about the pre-compiled kernels though. I use a vanilla kernel. Odd the Debian sources wouldn't have the fix. Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast stops working
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 08:11:40PM +0100, Alan Chandler wrote: On Monday 18 October 2004 01:51, Uwe Dippel wrote: Sitting on Sarge as-it-comes, daily updated. Suddenly xcdroast stops working today; last week it was okay. This is what I get: Calling: /usr/lib/xcdroast/bin/xcdrwrap CDRECORD dev= ATAPI:0,1,0 gracetime=2 fs=4096k driveropts=burnfree -v -useinfo speed=24 -dao -eject -pad -data /toast/track-01.iso ... scsidev: 'ATAPI:0,1,0' devname: 'ATAPI' Not sure with xcdroast where the device name is held, but you should get better results with dev=ATA That gives you dma write access. 2.6.8 requires you to run as root (as others have noted). I have been unable I use: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-386 ( Version 2.6.8-4 ) cdrecord ( Version 2.0+a38-1 ) mkisofs ( Version 2.0+a38-1 ) and when I have read : /usr/share/doc/cdrecord/README.ATAPI.setup and apply the part kernel 2.6.* cdrecord worked fine. ( (except for the multisession :-) ... ;-) ) (with kernel 2.4.20 ) I guess that it's xcdroast which has a problem with kernel 2.6.8 hth -- Gerard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast stops working
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 03:20:06 +0200, Uwe Dippel wrote: Linux dell 2.6.8-1-686 #1 Thu Oct 7 03:15:25 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux xcdroast 0.98+0alpha15 No solution, yet. But something wrong with 2.6.8: I simply booted to 2.6.3 and everything worked splendid; without any other changes. Just booted to 2.6.3. Strange ! Uwe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast stops working
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 19:23:26 +0800, Uwe Dippel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 03:20:06 +0200, Uwe Dippel wrote: Linux dell 2.6.8-1-686 #1 Thu Oct 7 03:15:25 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux xcdroast 0.98+0alpha15 No solution, yet. But something wrong with 2.6.8: I simply booted to 2.6.3 and everything worked splendid; without any other changes. Just booted to 2.6.3. Strange ! IIRC there's (or was) a bug with 2.6.8 about writing audio CD or something related. After reading some messages in this list i've noted only this morning that my root partition too was not umounted clean, and read of some scary XFS filesystems corruption, so maybe is the case i look back to 2.6.7 or 2.6.6... =) Andrea -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast stops working
On Monday 18 October 2004 21:23, Uwe Dippel wrote: On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 03:20:06 +0200, Uwe Dippel wrote: Linux dell 2.6.8-1-686 #1 Thu Oct 7 03:15:25 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux xcdroast 0.98+0alpha15 No solution, yet. But something wrong with 2.6.8: I simply booted to 2.6.3 and everything worked splendid; without any other changes. Just booted to 2.6.3. I think it's wong with 2.6.8. For security reasons it won't allow you to run setuid root programs. The only way you can run cdrecord is as the root user. AFAIK xcdroast is just a front end to cdrecord just like k3b. You might try 'cdrecord -scanbus' which I am fairly sure will give you an error in 2.6.8 Maybe I'm wrong but I can't see how running a binary as root user is any more secure than running it setuid root. Bob Parker -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast stops working
Robert Parker wrote: I think it's wong with 2.6.8. For security reasons it won't allow you to run setuid root programs. The only way you can run cdrecord is as the root user. You're abolutely right. I didn't think of limits of setuid. AFAIK xcdroast is just a front end to cdrecord just like k3b. Sure, it is. But I prefered to use the app I'm simply more used to. Maybe I'm wrong but I can't see how running a binary as root user is any more secure than running it setuid root. Sure, more secure. But also quite braindead. By default it is more secure, because you cannot 'pass' permissions. Uwe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast stops working
On Monday 18 October 2004 01:51, Uwe Dippel wrote: Sitting on Sarge as-it-comes, daily updated. Suddenly xcdroast stops working today; last week it was okay. This is what I get: Calling: /usr/lib/xcdroast/bin/xcdrwrap CDRECORD dev= ATAPI:0,1,0 gracetime=2 fs=4096k driveropts=burnfree -v -useinfo speed=24 -dao -eject -pad -data /toast/track-01.iso ... scsidev: 'ATAPI:0,1,0' devname: 'ATAPI' Not sure with xcdroast where the device name is held, but you should get better results with dev=ATA That gives you dma write access. 2.6.8 requires you to run as root (as others have noted). I have been unable to create any cd at all since 2.6.7 (as root or otherwise) so there is also some other bug hidden in there (its not hardware, I can dual boot into winxp and create a cd from there). -- Alan Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. --Gandhi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast stops working
On Monday 18 October 2004 23:04, Uwe Dippel wrote: Robert Parker wrote: I think it's wong with 2.6.8. For security reasons it won't allow you to run setuid root programs. The only way you can run cdrecord is as the root user. You're abolutely right. I didn't think of limits of setuid. AFAIK xcdroast is just a front end to cdrecord just like k3b. Sure, it is. But I prefered to use the app I'm simply more used to. Maybe I'm wrong but I can't see how running a binary as root user is any more secure than running it setuid root. Sure, more secure. But also quite braindead. By default it is more secure, because you cannot 'pass' permissions. This link just turned up in another thread, you might want to check it out. http://k3b.plainblack.com/index.pl/news2 Bob Parker Uwe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 07:24:09PM -0400, Tom Allison wrote: I have the 2.6 kernel. using this I've assumed I can run ATAPI burners, but XCDroast has heart burn itself... Used xcdroast with atapi cdrom under 2.6 kernel. Worked fine, except it would take forever if there wasn't a disk in the drive when trying to do something. It still works better with emulated scsi (as does vmware and some other things). help? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] +++ This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System at the Tel-Aviv University CC. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast
Micha Feigin wrote: On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 07:24:09PM -0400, Tom Allison wrote: I have the 2.6 kernel. using this I've assumed I can run ATAPI burners, but XCDroast has heart burn itself... I have 2.6.5 kernel, debian unstable xcdroast warns me tht I should be using scsi devices but other than that it seems to be working (only burned few CDs, didn't compare times). erik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast
On Fri, 2004-09-10 at 19:24, Tom Allison wrote: I have the 2.6 kernel. using this I've assumed I can run ATAPI burners, but XCDroast has heart burn itself... help? What errors? Which 2.6 kernel? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: xcdroast
#secure method=pgp mode=sign -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tom Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have the 2.6 kernel. using this I've assumed I can run ATAPI burners, but XCDroast has heart burn itself... help? Please help us help you by filling in the details. http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBQkXhUzgNqloQMwcRAqT9AJ9q0qwshb4m/nPiRvByj8Z3LriebACg22EE /XFTE6o3N7kuLSOjrGgEM5U= =OaRB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast - ProDVD ?
Le Wed, 18 Aug 2004 20:22:11 +0200 Georges Roux [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit: Bonjour, Je veux graver un dvd de ma fabriquation apres travail avec kino et blender J'ai un graveur DVD-R lambda mais parfaitement reconnu, et j'ai fait une image iso 9660, testée ok avec xine (mount) Je lance maintenant xcdroast pour finaliser et la il me demande d'ajouter le support ProDVD apt-cache search prodvd ne m'aide pas. Qu'elle paquet me manque t'il, que dois-je faire? A noter que si quelqu'un a une ligne de command pour graver un dvd a partir d'un iso, je prend aussi. Merci Georges Salut, Je me suis heurté au même problème il y a quelque temps et il semble que prodvd est un logiciel commercial, non libre. A+
Re: xcdroast - ProDVD ?
Gaëtan PERRIER wrote: Salut, Je me suis heurté au même problème il y a quelque temps et il semble que prodvd est un logiciel commercial, non libre. A+ ???, Qu'est ce que ca viens faire dans Debian et dans xcdroast? xcdroast n'est il plus libre? Quel paquet faut il installer pour graver un dvd (logiciel libre uniquement)? Georges
Re: xcdroast - ProDVD ?
Le Wed, 18 Aug 2004 21:14:39 +0200 Georges Roux [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit: ???, Qu'est ce que ca viens faire dans Debian et dans xcdroast? xcdroast n'est il plus libre? xcdroast si mais ce n'est qu'un frontend a cdrecord pour les cd-r et a prodvd pour les dvd. Quel paquet faut il installer pour graver un dvd (logiciel libre uniquement)? k3b le fait.
Re: xcdroast - ProDVD ?
Le Wed 18/08/2004, Georges Roux disait Gaëtan PERRIER wrote: Salut, Je me suis heurté au même problème il y a quelque temps et il semble que prodvd est un logiciel commercial, non libre. A+ ???, Qu'est ce que ca viens faire dans Debian et dans xcdroast? xcdroast n'est il plus libre? Quel paquet faut il installer pour graver un dvd (logiciel libre uniquement)? dvd+rw-tools Y'a pas de front-end graphique, mais growisofs marche très bien... -- Erwan
RE: xcdroast ile müzik cd'sini birebir kopyalarken aþýrý yavaþlýk problemi
Merhaba, On Wed, 2004-07-21 at 00:05, Emre Sevinc wrote: xcdroast FAQ belgesinde 2. maddede belirtilenleri yaptým: http://www.xcdroast.org/faq/#2 Ardýndan bilgisayarý reboot edip xcdroast'u çalýþtýrýp setup'tan Rescan devices seçince bu sefer ATAPI deðil de SCSI cihaz olarak gördü. Þu anda 11x ila 12x civarý bir hýzda kopyalýyor müzik CD'sini yine de daha yüksek bir hýz bekliyordum ama idare eder (40x civarý hýza nasýl çýkabileceðime dair önerisi olan var mý? ) http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2002/04/msg00658.html Bu link farkli bir acidan yardimci olabilir...
RE: xcdroast ile müzik cd'sini birebir kopyalark en aþýrý yavaþlýk problemi
Title: RE: xcdroast ile müzik cd'sini birebir kopyalarken aþýrý yavaþlýk problemi xcdroast FAQ belgesinde 2. maddede belirtilenleri yaptým: http://www.xcdroast.org/faq/#2 Ardýndan bilgisayarý reboot edip xcdroast'u çalýþtýrýp setup'tan Rescan devices seçince bu sefer ATAPI deðil de SCSI cihaz olarak gördü. Þu anda 11x ila 12x civarý bir hýzda kopyalýyor müzik CD'sini yine de daha yüksek bir hýz bekliyordum ama idare eder (40x civarý hýza nasýl çýkabileceðime dair önerisi olan var mý? ) Bu arada yazma iþlemi gerçekleþirken bilgisayarýn performansýnda çok ciddi düþüþ var oysaki FAQ belgesinde SCSI emülasyonu olunca DMA kullanýlacaðýný dolayýsý ile ciddi bir yavaþlama olmayacaðý belirtiliyordu. Ancak performans sorunlarýndan ziyade bu sefer de artýk SCSI emülasyonu altýnda çalýþan *CD OKUYUCUMDA MUZIK CD'LERINI OKUYAMAZ HALDEYIM!* :o Data CD takýp mount edince sorun olmuyor ama müzik CD'si takýnca sorun var. /etc/fstab dosyamý þu þekilde deðiþtirdim: === # /etc/fstab: static file system information. # # file system mount point type options dump pass /dev/hda2 / ext2 errors=remount-ro 0 1 /dev/hda3 none swap sw 0 0 proc /proc proc defaults 0 0 /dev/fd0 /floppy auto user,noauto 0 0 #/dev/cdrom /cdrom iso9660 ro,user,noauto 0 0 /dev/sr0 /cdrom iso9660 ro,user,noauto 0 0 /dev/hda1 /NTFS ntfs === Bu þekilde bir data CD varken ve # mount /dev/sr0 deyince maalesef === mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sr0, or too many mounted file systems === hatasýný alýyorum. Ayrýca /dev/sr0, /dev/scd0 ve /dev/cdrom ile ilgili bilgiler þöyle: === debian:/dev# ls -l sr0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Oct 27 2002 sr0 - scd0 debian:/dev# ls -l cdrom lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Oct 27 2002 cdrom - hdb debian:/dev# ls -l scd0 brw-rw 1 root cdrom 11, 0 Mar 14 2002 scd0 === Bir forumda ln -sf sr0 cdrom önerilmiþ, /dev dizini içine girip bunu da yaptým ancak herhangi bir deðiþiklik olmadý :( Acaba hem SCSI emülasyonu altýnda güzel güzel CD yazýp hem de normal müzik CD'si dinlememe yardýmcý olacak Debian cengaverleri var mý? Imdat! :) Þimdiden teþekkürler. -Original Message- From: Emre Sevinc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tue 7/20/2004 9:45 PM To: debian-user-turkish@lists.debian.org Subject: xcdroast ile müzik cd'sini birebir kopyalarken aþýrý yavaþlýk problemi Evdeki Debian yüklü bilgisayarýmda xcdroast'un son sürümünü kullanýyorum (Debian unstable paket arþivinden çektiðim sürüm). Þimdiye dek sabit diskten CD'ye veri yazma ya da normal veri içeren CD'den CD'ye yazmada herhangi bir performans sorunu yaþamadým. Sistemimde 1 CD okuyucu ve 1 CD yazýcý var (48x). Ancak bu akþam ilk kez bir müzik CD'sini kopyalamaya çalýþýrken korkunç bir performans problemi ile karþýlaþtým ve sebebini anlayamadým. Þu anda xcdroast programýný baþlatmamýn üzerinden yaklaþýk 30 dakika geçmiþ durumda ve henüz 1. parçanýn %62'sini yazdý! Takdir edersiniz ki bu kabul edilebilir bir hýz deðil, önce 20x ile yazýyorum falan dedi, þu anda ise hýzý 0.2x seviyesine düþürmüþ durumda yani aþýrý yavaþ :( Acaba ben mi ayarlarda bir saçmalýk yaptým bilemiyorum, bu ayarlara dokunmadan yukarýda da belirttiðim gibi diskten CD'ye ve data CD'den CD'ye makul hýzlarda yazabiliyordu sistem. Herhangi bir yorumu, çözüm önerisi, vs. olan? Bir ara dokümanlarda lilo.conf'a scsi ile ilgili bir þeyler eklenmesi gerektiðine dair bir þeyler okumuþtum ancak yine hatýrladýðým kadarý ile xcdroast'un son sürümünde buna gerek olmadýðý söyleniyordu, neyse, ben þimdi yazma iþlemini durduruyorum maalesef :( Calling: /usr/lib/xcdroast/bin/xcdrwrap CDRECORD dev= ATAPI:1,0,0 gracetime=2 fs=4096k driveropts=burnfree -v -useinfo speed=48 -dao -eject -pad -waiti -audio /tmp/xcdr-tmp-2152-00.inf /tmp/xcdr-tmp-2152-01.inf /tmp/xcdr-tmp-2152-02.inf /tmp/xcdr-tmp-2152-03.inf /tmp/xcdr-tmp-2152-04.inf /tmp/xcdr-tmp-2152-05.inf /tmp/xcdr-tmp-2152-06.inf /tmp/xcdr-tmp-2152-07.inf /tmp/xcdr-tmp-2152-08.inf scsidev: 'ATAPI:1,0,0' devname: 'ATAPI' scsibus: 1 target: 0 lun: 0 Warning: Using ATA Packet interface. Warning: The related libscg interface code is in pre alpha. Warning: There may be fatal problems. SCSI buffer size: 64512 Cdrecord-Clone 2.01a29 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2004 Jörg Schilling NOTE: this version of cdrecord is an inofficial (modified) release of cdrecord and thus may have bugs that are not present in the original version. Please send bug reports and support requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]. The original author should not be bothered with problems of this version. TOC Type: 0 = CD-DA Waiting for data
Re: xcdroast in kernel 2.6 doesn't work with ATAPI or SCSI - BY-PASSED
On 15 Jun 2004, Anthony Campbell wrote: It's supposed to be unnecessary to use scsi-emulation in 2.6 kernels but if I try to use ATAPI, xcdroast simply hangs with a message saying it won't work properly (this is latest version from Sid). I therefore gave up and compiled a kernel with SCSI emulation, which worked for me in kernel 2.4, but in 2.6 it fails to detect any drives at all, even though syslog shows that scsi emulation has worked. Is there any way round this or do I have to revert to a 2.4 kernel whenever I want to burn a CD? Does cdrecord work in 2.6 (I've never got into cdrecord directly yet). xcdroast resolutely refuses to run, but after a couple of hours work I got to grips with mkisofs and cdrecord and I can now burn CDs without problems. Probably rather quicker and easier than xcdroast, in fact. Anthony -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]|| http://www.acampbell.org.uk using Linux GNU/Debian || for book reviews, electronic Windows-free zone || books and skeptical articles -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast in kernel 2.6 doesn't work with ATAPI or SCSI - BY-PASSED
Anthony Campbell wrote: On 15 Jun 2004, Anthony Campbell wrote: It's supposed to be unnecessary to use scsi-emulation in 2.6 kernels but if I try to use ATAPI, xcdroast simply hangs with a message saying it won't work properly (this is latest version from Sid). I therefore gave up and compiled a kernel with SCSI emulation, which worked for me in kernel 2.4, but in 2.6 it fails to detect any drives at all, even though syslog shows that scsi emulation has worked. Is there any way round this or do I have to revert to a 2.4 kernel whenever I want to burn a CD? Does cdrecord work in 2.6 (I've never got into cdrecord directly yet). xcdroast resolutely refuses to run, but after a couple of hours work I got to grips with mkisofs and cdrecord and I can now burn CDs without problems. Probably rather quicker and easier than xcdroast, in fact. Anthony indeed. use mkisofs, cdrecord (and if necessary) cdparanoia. that's an commandline solution for burning cdroms. steef -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:38:51AM +, Gavin Seddon wrote: this find command returned nothing. Also, I noticed people are irritated by my replies. But, each time I send a message to debian list it starts a new thread and I am unable to reply directly to messages. So, what do I do? 'apt-get install mutt', or you can configure KMail correctly. Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast
Hello Gavin Seddon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: (quoting fixed) I checked the config file for that kernel, and I found this: CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDESCSI=m So the ide-scsi module should be there. Run find /lib/modules/2.2.20-idepci/ -name ide-scsi.o to see if it can be found. this find command returned nothing. Install another kernel? Try apt-get install kernel-image-2.2.20, or apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18-$arch. If you use one of the 2.4.18 images, don't forget to tell lilo to use the initrd for that kernel. Also, I noticed people are irritated by my replies. But, each time I send a message to debian list it starts a new thread and I am unable to reply directly to messages. So, what do I do? Select reply to list, or press L in kmail. best regards Andreas Janssen -- Andreas Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP-Key-ID: 0xDC801674 Registered Linux User #267976 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 06:17:20PM +, Gavin Seddon wrote: Hi, This is what I get. 1# uname -r 2.2.20-idepci Hi, This is your magic fix. http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html - -- .''`. Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : `. `'` proud Debian admin and user `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/4SkRUzgNqloQMwcRAi6DAJ43QAOY+5SBg8rt3uXMoxdsxopgeACg1FqC dtQI88qnlslbiVTPMo6zFxU= =xSqD -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast
Hello Gavin Seddon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I put the append line in my lilo.conf and success in that I get the hdc found when I reboot. However, when I start xcdroast the cdrw is still not found. Can you help pls? What did the line look like? And did you re-run lilo? Are member of the cdrom group? If not, add yourself to that group, log out and in again. Also, make sure the ide-scsi module is loaded: modprobe ide-scsi Now use cdrecord -scanbus to see if your drive is listed. Add ide-scsi to /etc/modules to load it automatically at boottime. best regards Andreas Janssen -- Andreas Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP-Key-ID: 0xDC801674 Registered Linux User #267976 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast
On Tuesday 16 December 2003 12:31, Andreas Janssen wrote: modprobe ide-scsi Yes the conf file is ok, but when I run modprobe Iget modprobe ide-scsi modprobe: Can't locate module ide-scsi Also, when I run cdrecord it complains of not being there. It must be installed though . Gavin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast
Hello Gavin Seddon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Tuesday 16 December 2003 12:31, Andreas Janssen wrote: modprobe ide-scsi Yes the conf file is ok, but when I run modprobe Iget modprobe ide-scsi modprobe: Can't locate module ide-scsi That is strange. What kernel do you use? What does uname -r say? best regards Andreas Janssen -- Andreas Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP-Key-ID: 0xDC801674 Registered Linux User #267976 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 13:17, Gavin Seddon wrote: Hi, This is what I get. 1# uname -r 2.2.20-idepci Was this supposed to be meaningful to someone, or just for fun? ;-) -- Mark Roach -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast
Hello Mark Roach ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 13:17, Gavin Seddon wrote: This is what I get. 1# uname -r 2.2.20-idepci Was this supposed to be meaningful to someone, or just for fun? ;-) It means that he replies to a message, but started a new thread and left away the content of the former messages, so that no one can understand the context. I checked the config file for that kernel, and I found this: CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDESCSI=m So the ide-scsi module should be there. Run find /lib/modules/2.2.20-idepci/ -name ide-scsi.o to see if it can be found. best regards Andreas Janssen -- Andreas Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP-Key-ID: 0xDC801674 Registered Linux User #267976 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 14:20:56 -0500, Mark Roach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 13:17, Gavin Seddon wrote: Hi, This is what I get. 1# uname -r 2.2.20-idepci Was this supposed to be meaningful to someone, or just for fun? ;-) ..I guess yes, he lost his own thread and started a new one. Gavin, _reply_to_list_, *not* Compose new message. ;-) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast: DVDs brennen mit xcdroast und cdrecord-prodvd
Andreas Metzler wrote: Maik Holtkamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] BTW: Cdrecord-Prodvd ist auf 4 fach Brennen beschraengt. Wenn Du cdrecord durch cdrecord.Prodvd ersetzt, wie auf der obigen Seite vorgeschlagen, kannst Du AFAIK auch CDs nur noch 4-fach brennen. Iirc (aus Artikeln in dchl.brenner) ist die Speed Beschraenkung in aktuellen Gratisversionen von Cdrecord-Prodvd gefallen. Den thread habe ich gefunden, das README auf dem ftp von cdrecord-Prodvd behauptet aber nach wie vor: ---cut--- If you have this key (this one has been renewed on Aug 2th 2003): key as environment variable, cdrecord-ProDVD will not be limited when writing DVDs. However, it is limited to 4x or the lowest possible speed of the drive (whatever value is higher) if you write a CD. ---cut--- Das wraper script (ist wohl auch auf dem neusten Stand) macht also IMHO noch Sinn. Ich vermute mal das auch dvd writing, obwohl es da ja eingentlich nicht steht, auf 4x beschrägt ist. Spätestens wenn die 8x Brenner/Rohlinge kommen, sollte dann wohl dvd brennen vornehmlich über die dvd+rwtools in Richtung OSS gehen. -- - maik -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: xcdroast
Andreas Sonnabend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ich möchte eine bootable CD erstellen. Dazu brauche ich wohl eine boot.img. Im Internet gibt es zwar einige abenteurliche Arten über iso, die sind bei mir aber nicht gelungen. Falls es keine Möglichkeit gibt, diese Datei runterzuladen, wie kann ich sie mir einfach erstellen? Dazu wäre nötig zu wissen, _was_ Du von der CD booten willst. Normalerweise sollte es ausreichen, mittels dd ein Image von einer bootfähigen Diskette zu erzeugen und das dann als boot.img anzugeben. Michael -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: Xcdroast, cdrecord and SafeDisk Copy protection
Hi! On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 08:49:45PM -0500, Nick Lidakis wrote: Can anyone point me in the right direction? Have You tried cdrdao? Not sure if it helps, but it can copy some copy-protected CDs. (apt-get install cdrdao) Patrik msg26843/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: xcdroast - groupe - module...
Le mercredi 22 janvier 2003, patrice a écrit... bonjour, $ xcdroast CRITICAL: Wrapper /usr/lib/xcdroast-0.98/bin/xcdrwrap from Version instead of 0.98alpha9 WARNING: Wrapper /usr/lib/xcdroast-0.98/bin/xcdrwrap configured sharedir instead of /usr/lib/xcdroast-0.98 CRITICAL: Wrapper /usr/lib/xcdroast-0.98/bin/xcdrwrap configured prefixdir instead of /usr Aborting... quelqu'un saurait traduire ce que cela signifie? d'où vient le probléme? T'as pas fait une infâme mixture de divers xcdroast ? Ça vient d'un paquet .deb ? -- jean-michel
Re: xcdroast - groupe - module...
Le Mercredi 22 Janvier 2003 14:01, Jean-Michel OLTRA a écrit : Le mercredi 22 janvier 2003, patrice a écrit... bonjour, $ xcdroast CRITICAL: Wrapper /usr/lib/xcdroast-0.98/bin/xcdrwrap from Version instead of 0.98alpha9 WARNING: Wrapper /usr/lib/xcdroast-0.98/bin/xcdrwrap configured sharedir instead of /usr/lib/xcdroast-0.98 CRITICAL: Wrapper /usr/lib/xcdroast-0.98/bin/xcdrwrap configured prefixdir instead of /usr Aborting... quelqu'un saurait traduire ce que cela signifie? d'où vient le probléme? T'as pas fait une infâme mixture de divers xcdroast ? non, non... peut etre qu'aprés un apt-get update... mais en fait auparavant je n'avais jamais fait fonctionné mon graveur, n'ayant mis le module ide-scsi que depuis 2 ou 3 jours... Ça vient d'un paquet .deb ? oui aprés un apt-get install... je ne connais pas la source exacte... suite à ta remarque, j'ai désinstallé xcdroast, pensant que cela mettrait à jour xcdroast lors de la réinstallation, mais à la fin de l'installation, il m'indique ceci : Paramétrage de xcdroast (0.98+0alpha9-9) ... An override for /usr/bin/cdrecord already exists, aborting An override for /usr/bin/cdda2wav already exists, aborting An override for /usr/bin/readcd already exists, aborting An override for /usr/lib/xcdroast-0.98/bin/xcdrwrap already exists, aborting donc pas pu le réinstaller... bon... d'habitude j'utilise xcdroast, je crois que je vais laisser tomber, il semblerait que kreatecd soit assez pratique également de ce que j'ai pu lire sur des sites... je vais l'essayer... par contre si quelqu'un connaitrait la raison de ce probléme... merci jean michel pour tes remarques... patrice -- La guerre serait un bienfait si elle ne tuait que les professionnels ,. ( . ). ( ) )' ,') . (` '` .; ) ' (( ( );(, (( ( ;))Prévert _., ,._'_.,)_(..,( . )_ _' )_') (. _..( '..
Re: xcdroast - groupe - module...
Le mercredi 22 janvier 2003, patrice a écrit... bonjour, suite à ta remarque, j'ai désinstallé xcdroast, pensant que cela mettrait à jour xcdroast lors de la réinstallation, mais à la fin de l'installation, il m'indique ceci : Paramétrage de xcdroast (0.98+0alpha9-9) ... An override for /usr/bin/cdrecord already exists, aborting An override for /usr/bin/cdda2wav already exists, aborting An override for /usr/bin/readcd already exists, aborting An override for /usr/lib/xcdroast-0.98/bin/xcdrwrap already exists, aborting Faire un dpkg -L xcdroast pour voir si il ne reste pas des résidus ? (ce xcdwrap ?) apt-show-versions -u pour voir si certains paquets n'ont pas été mis à jour ? bon... d'habitude j'utilise xcdroast, je crois que je vais laisser tomber, il semblerait que kreatecd soit assez pratique également de ce que j'ai pu lire sur des sites... je vais l'essayer... Bof, de toutes façons à la ligne de commande avec mkisofs et cdrecord ça va aussi bien et ça évite d'installer un logiciel en surcouche. Mais bon c'est chacun qui voit. -- jean-michel
Re: xcdroast erlaubt keine normalen User
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 10:58:34PM +0100, Christoph Glaubitz wrote: On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 05:51:59PM +0100, Christian H. Kuhn wrote: -rws--x---1 root xcdwrite 272K 2002-12-27 21:03 /usr/bin/cdrecord sollte doch eigentlich reichen. Nee. Das reicht nicht. Um das ausführen zu dürfen benötigt die Gruppe auch Leserechte. Hallo Christian, ich habe zwar nicht den ganzen Thread verfolgt, aber ich wollte dir nur sagen, das die o.g. Berechtigungen schon reichen, damit normale User mit cdrecord brennen koennen. Bei mir schaut es so aus: -rws--x--- 1 root cdburner /usr/local/bin/cdrecord Damit kann jeder, der in der Gruppe cdburner ist, mit cdrecord brennen, wenn man noch die /dev/sgx Eintraege anpasst. Denn da braucht die Gruppe auch Lese- und Schreibrechte. Hth Michael -- Es gibt keine Witze über Microsoft, es sind Tatsachen. msg30966/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: xcdroast erlaubt keine normalen User
Michael Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-01-04 11:36]: On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 10:58:34PM +0100, Christoph Glaubitz wrote: On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 05:51:59PM +0100, Christian H. Kuhn wrote: -rws--x---1 root xcdwrite 272K 2002-12-27 21:03 /usr/bin/cdrecord ich habe zwar nicht den ganzen Thread verfolgt, aber ich wollte dir nur sagen, das die o.g. Berechtigungen schon reichen, damit normale User mit cdrecord brennen koennen. Bei mir schaut es so aus: -rws--x--- 1 root cdburner /usr/local/bin/cdrecord Damit kann jeder, der in der Gruppe cdburner ist, mit cdrecord brennen, wenn man noch die /dev/sgx Eintraege anpasst. Denn da braucht die Gruppe auch Lese- und Schreibrechte. Klar. Mit cdrecord kann ich auch arbeiten. xcdroast mag nicht. mfg Christian -- Nach meiner Definition ist eine Software dann strategisch, wenn man sonst keine Gründe für ihren Einsatz findet, sie aber unbedingt einsetzen will. Holger Marzen in dasr msg31026/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: xcdroast erlaubt keine normalen User
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 05:51:59PM +0100, Christian H. Kuhn wrote: -rws--x---1 root xcdwrite 272K 2002-12-27 21:03 /usr/bin/cdrecord sollte doch eigentlich reichen. Nee. Das reicht nicht. Um das ausführen zu dürfen benötigt die Gruppe auch Leserechte. Aber auch nach der Änderung passiert nix. hast du die Benutzer in die /etc/group eingetragen und dich dann mit dem User neu angemeldet. D. H. X ausgeloggt und dann wieder neu rein? Du bist in der Gruppe eingetragen, die Berechtigungen auf dein Device hat? Muss du xcdroast vielleicht auch mit Set user ID Bit laufen lassen (chmod 4750) ? Was sagt den der befehl cdrecord auf der Konsole? Poste mal den Output von cdrecord -scanbus. -- Gruß Christoph Glaubitz -- Häufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: xcdroast erlaubt keine normalen User
Hallo Christoph, Christoph Glaubitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-01-01 23:03]: On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 05:51:59PM +0100, Christian H. Kuhn wrote: -rws--x---1 root xcdwrite 272K 2002-12-27 21:03 /usr/bin/cdrecord sollte doch eigentlich reichen. Nee. Das reicht nicht. Um das ausführen zu dürfen benötigt die Gruppe auch Leserechte. Richtig. Übersehen. hast du die Benutzer in die /etc/group eingetragen und dich dann mit dem User neu angemeldet. D. H. X ausgeloggt und dann wieder neu rein? Ja. Aus anderen Gründen sogar richtig neugebootet. Du bist in der Gruppe eingetragen, die Berechtigungen auf dein Device hat? home:/# ll /dev/scd0 brw-rw-rw-1 root xcdwrite 11, 0 2002-11-28 18:53 /dev/scd0 Muss du xcdroast vielleicht auch mit Set user ID Bit laufen lassen (chmod 4750) ? Nein. home:~$ xcdroast Gtk-WARNING **: This process is currently running setuid or setgid. This is not a supported use of GTK+. You must create a helper program instead. For further details, see: http://www.gtk.org/setuid.html Refusing to initialize GTK+. Was sagt den der befehl cdrecord auf der Konsole? Poste mal den Output von cdrecord -scanbus. home:~$ cdrecord --scanbus Cdrecord 2.0 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2002 Jörg Schilling Linux sg driver version: 3.1.24 Using libscg version 'schily-0.7' scsibus0: 0,0,0 0) 'ATAPI ' 'CD-R/RW 20X10 ' 'H.DH' Removable CD-ROM 0,1,0 1) 'LITEON ' 'DVD-ROM LTD163D ' 'GHR3' Removable CD-ROM 0,2,0 2) * 0,3,0 3) * 0,4,0 4) * 0,5,0 5) * 0,6,0 6) * 0,7,0 7) * mfg Christian -- Dazu paßt auch der Trend weg von der Kommandozeile: Dem Computer *Kommandos* erteilen - nein, das geht nun wirklich nicht. Nein, *wir* haben gefälligst *seine* Fragen zu beantworten und *seine* Meldungen zu bestätigen... (Christopher Eltschka in ger.ct) -- Häufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: xcdroast erlaubt keine normalen User
Hi Christian, On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 10:50:19PM +0100, Christian H. Kuhn wrote: Hans-Georg Bork [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-12-30 22:15]: Doch. root:xcdwrite, 666. Xcdroast arbeitet mit cdrecord zusammen. Hast du darauf Berechtigungen? Mach mal chmod 4755 /usr/bin/cdrecord. Die Gruppe muss du eventuell auch ändern. Bzw. dich in die richtige eintragen. Guten Rutsch. -- Gruß Christoph Glaubitz -- Häufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: xcdroast erlaubt keine normalen User
Moin, On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 18:48, Christian H. Kuhn wrote: [...] Und trotzdem geht nix. Ich soll mich fragen, ob ich mir Zugriff gewähre. Was hab ich übersehen? die Gruppe hat keine rw Rechte auf die Geraetedatei? Gruss -- hgb -- Häufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: xcdroast erlaubt keine normalen User
Hans-Georg Bork [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-12-30 22:15]: die Gruppe hat keine rw Rechte auf die Geraetedatei? Doch. root:xcdwrite, 666. mfg Christian -- Dazu paßt auch der Trend weg von der Kommandozeile: Dem Computer *Kommandos* erteilen - nein, das geht nun wirklich nicht. Nein, *wir* haben gefälligst *seine* Fragen zu beantworten und *seine* Meldungen zu bestätigen... (Christopher Eltschka in ger.ct) -- Häufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: xcdroast fehlt helvetica
Hi! On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 02:50:07PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** WARNING **: Font -*-helvetica-bold-r-normal-*-*-240-*-*-p-*-*,-default-*-bold-r-*--24-*-*-*-*-*-*-*,*-bold-r-*,* not found Sind die Pakete xfonts-[base|100dpi|75dpi]-transcoded installiert? Shade and sweet water! Stephan -- | Stephan Seitz E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | WWW: http://fsing.fs.uni-sb.de/~stse/| | PGP Public Keys: http://fsing.fs.uni-sb.de/~stse/pgp.html | msg29412/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: xcdroast fehlt helvetica
Hallo, ja die xfonts-[base|100dpi|75dpi]-transcoded pakete haben gefehlt. Nach der Insallation funktioniert xcdroast wieder einwandfrei. Danke. viele Grüsse Memala Stephan Seitz wrote: ** WARNING **: Font -*-helvetica-bold-r-normal-*-*-240-*-*-p-*-*,-default-*-bold-r-*--24-*-*-*-*-*-*-*,*-bold-r-*,* not found Sind die Pakete xfonts-[base|100dpi|75dpi]-transcoded installiert? -- +++ GMX - Mail, Messaging more http://www.gmx.net +++ NEU: Mit GMX ins Internet. Rund um die Uhr für 1 ct/ Min. surfen! -- Häufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: xcdroast 0.98-10 in Zeitlupe
Am Die, 2002-10-22 um 20.01 schrieb Michael Fogel: Hallo, Hallo Michael, ich hab mir grad XCDRoast 0.98-10 installiert und auch alle Pakete ugedatet, die in Abhängigkeit dazu stehen (also libc6 etc... wie auf http://packages.debian.org/unstable/otherosfs/xcdroast.html). Es läuft zwar auch irgendwie, aber in einer Geschwindigkeit die nicht mehr benutzbar ist, also ca 2 min zum Starten, je 2 weitere um in ein anders Menü zu gelangen, und ich hab keine Ahnung warum. Das Problem taucht übrigens nicht nur bei 0.98-10 auf, sondern war auch schon bei dem stable-release 0.98-8 da... Wenn ich xcdroast aus einer konsole heraus starte meckert es nur über fehlende Fonts: ***Achtung Fehlermeldung*** The Font -*-helvetica-blablabla does not supportall the required character sets for the current locale de_DE@euro (missing character set ISO8859-15) (missing character set ISO8859-15) ***Fehlermeldung Ende*** Diese Meldung wiederholt sich laufend, so ca alle 3 sec. Wo könnte ich ansetzen? Woran könnts liegen? Du musst die Pakete xfonts-100dpi-transcoded, xfonts-75dpi-transcoded und xfonts-base-transcoded installieren. Grüße Klaus Duscher -- Häufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: xcdroast 0.98-10 in Zeitlupe
Am 22.10.2002 20:01 schrieb Michael Fogel: Hallo, ich hab mir grad XCDRoast 0.98-10 installiert und auch alle Pakete ugedatet, die in Abhängigkeit dazu stehen (also libc6 etc... wie auf http://packages.debian.org/unstable/otherosfs/xcdroast.html). Es läuft zwar auch irgendwie, aber in einer Geschwindigkeit die nicht mehr benutzbar ist, also ca 2 min zum Starten, je 2 weitere um in ein anders Menü zu gelangen, und ich hab keine Ahnung warum. [...] Diese Meldung wiederholt sich laufend, so ca alle 3 sec. Wo könnte ich ansetzen? Woran könnts liegen? Ich habe hier das gleich Problem (siehe meine Mail) Abhilfe hat bei mir die Option -o gebracht. Es scheint tatsächlich mit den Fonts zusammen zuhängen. Nur welche Fonts wie installiert werden müßen, weiss ich auch nicht. Vieleicht hat jemand einen Tip? (Auflösungen lt. dselect/apt-get sind erfüllt) Gruß und danke, Michael Fogel -- bis dann joerg arlandt ... powered by debian GNU/Linux http://www.arlandt.de -- Häufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: xcdroast 0.98-10 in Zeitlupe
Ich habe hier das gleich Problem (siehe meine Mail) Abhilfe hat bei mir die Option -o gebracht. Es scheint tatsächlich mit den Fonts zusammen zuhängen. Nur welche Fonts wie installiert werden müßen, weiss ich auch nicht. Vieleicht hat jemand einen Tip? (Auflösungen lt. dselect/apt-get sind erfüllt) Ja, danke, mit -o läuft xcdroast normal schnell. Wenn jetzt noch jemand weiß was mit den Fonts los ist wär ich dankbar. Ich hab grad bemerkt, dass auch xmms diese Ausgabe erzeugt, also: ***Achtung Meldung*** The Font -*-helvetica-blablabla does not supportall the required character sets for the current locale de_DE@euro (missing character set ISO8859-15) (missing character set ISO8859-15) ***Meldung Ende*** So, aber xcdroast klappt immer noch net so ganz und zwar: Wenn ich ne Audio-CD einlege und auf CD/Image Information gehe, bekomme ich angegeben, dass eine leere CD-R/RW im Laufwerk sei. Mit xmms kann ich die CD abspielen. xcdroast erkennt das CDRom aber problemlos und die IDE-SCSI-Emulation klappt ansonsten auch. Danke, Michael Fogel -- Häufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: xcdroast - potato 2.2_r6
El Mié 08 May 2002 07:09, Edilberto Ramírez de la Torre escribió: Hola a todos, buenas noches acá, buenos días por allá; este es mi primer contacto con la lista... Al grano, cuando quiero echar a andar el xcdroast me presenta el siguiente error: Xlib: connection to :0.0 refused by server Xlib: Client is not authorized to connect to Server Sencillo: has arrancado X con un usuario y luego has pasado a root para usar el xcdroast. Por defecto X no permite que otro usuario escriba en la pantalla. Soluciones: - La nada recomendable: entra en X como root. - La fácil: $ xhost + $ su - # xcdroast - La elegante, con el paquete ssh: $ exec ssh -X [EMAIL PROTECTED] # xcdroast Violación de segmento ¿? Además, instalo, desinstalo y vuelvo a instalar (con dselect) el netscape y no aparece por ningún lado. Estoy en Gnome como ambiente gráfico. Agradeceré cualquier ayuda. Creo que es el paquete netscape-base-4, que te pide otros. Debería funcionar escribiendo en el terminal: netscape Por cierto que, por seguridad, root no puede ejecutarlo. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast - potato 2.2_r6
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 07:35:41PM +0200, José Luis Fernández Barros wrote: Sencillo: has arrancado X con un usuario y luego has pasado a root para usar el xcdroast. Por defecto X no permite que otro usuario escriba en la pantalla. Soluciones: - La nada recomendable: entra en X como root. - La fácil: $ xhost + $ su - # xcdroast - La elegante, con el paquete ssh: $ exec ssh -X [EMAIL PROTECTED] # xcdroast - La más elegante ;-) $ sudo xcdroast Pero hay que configurar el sudo. apt-get install sudo man sudo man sudoers Violación de segmento ¿? Además, instalo, desinstalo y vuelvo a instalar (con dselect) el netscape y no aparece por ningún lado. Estoy en Gnome como ambiente gráfico. Agradeceré cualquier ayuda. Creo que es el paquete netscape-base-4, que te pide otros. Debería funcionar escribiendo en el terminal: netscape Por cierto que, por seguridad, root no puede ejecutarlo. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Codigo ergo sum - Ignacio García Fernández [EMAIL PROTECTED] Instituto de Robótica. Universidad de Valencia. Tlf. 96 398 3583 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast / mkisofs
Hallo, In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Das geht eine Weile so weiter. Wenn viele Dateien auf der CD sind, beendet mkisofs seine Arbeit mit einer Fehlermeldung. Na welche Meldung denn? mkisofs: Joliet tree sort failed. Der Eindruck kann täuschen. Der Suffix-Protection-Patch ist seit kurzem drin, aber der sollte nichts kaputt machen. Scheint aber indirekt daran zu liegen. Vielleicht ist es nur ein kleiner Fehler, der dafür sorgt, daß die Strings rekursiv abgearbeitet werden. Wo kann ich denn etwas darüber nachlesen oder den Quelltext des Patches einsehen? Auf der CDRecord-Homepage habe ich nichts gefunden. Probiere mal die neuste Alpha-Version von http://people.debian.org/~blade/testing/ und schick die Fehlermeldung an den Verantwortlichen (*g*). würde ich gerne... deepthought:/tmp# dpkg -i mkisofs_1.11-0.1_i386.deb dpkg: regarding mkisofs_1.11-0.1_i386.deb containing mkisofs: xcdroast conflicts with mkisofs (= 4:1.10.0) mkisofs (version 4:1.11-0.1) is to be installed. Wir schaukeln das Pferdchen noch. Danke und Gruß Holger -- Using a computer should always be easier than not using a computer - Ted Nelson -- Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: xcdroast / mkisofs
#include hallo.h Holger Leskien wrote on Tue Apr 23, 2002 um 08:46:13PM: Das geht eine Weile so weiter. Wenn viele Dateien auf der CD sind, beendet mkisofs seine Arbeit mit einer Fehlermeldung. Na welche Meldung denn? Ich habe den Eindruck, daß dieser Fehler erst seit einem Paket-Update (testing) besteht, kann mir aber überhaupt nicht erklären, was das soll. Der Eindruck kann täuschen. Der Suffix-Protection-Patch ist seit kurzem drin, aber der sollte nichts kaputt machen. Ich habe sogar ausprobiert, ob es an den Umlauten liegt, aber dem ist nicht so. Wer weiß mehr? Probiere mal die neuste Alpha-Version von http://people.debian.org/~blade/testing/ und schick die Fehlermeldung an den Verantwortlichen (*g*). Gruss/Regards, Eduard. -- Zum 1.000.001. Mal: Jedes Programm, das kompliziertere Funktionen bietet als Space Invaders verlangt eine 'zeitraubende intensive Einarbeitung' wenn man es vernünftig nutzen möchte. -- Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: XCDROAST,+PROBLEMAS
tengo instalados todos los paquetes que me pide el archivo README, pero lo que no se es donde los instala dselect por defecto.El hecho es que a pesar de tener dichas librerías instaladas me canta el mismo error: gtk/gtk.h not such a file or directory gdk/gdk.h gdk_imlib.h cuando intenta compilar main.c Con las líneas de #include tienes en el fuente los ficheros de cabecera esos que te faltan los está buscando el el directorio /usr/include/gtk /usr/include/gdk y /usr/include respectivamente. Como ahí seguro que no están, de ahí el error, si estás seguro de tenerlos búscalos por los directorios con find (find / -name gtk.h). ¿Seguro que tienes instalados los paquetes xxx-dev necesarios? Otro saludo y a ver si lo consigues.
Re: XCDROAST,+PROBLEMAS
Marc MaymX wrote: tengo instalados todos los paquetes que me pide el archivo README, pero lo que no se es donde los instala dselect por defecto.El hecho es que a pesar de tener dichas librerías instaladas me canta el mismo error: gtk/gtk.h not such a file or directory gdk/gdk.h gdk_imlib.h cuando intenta compilar main.c Muchas gracias.Saludos __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1 Este comando te dirá los parámetros que hay que pasarle al compilador para que encuentre la librería gtk: gtk-config --cflags gtk Y este otro los parámetro par enlazarlas: gtk-config --libs A lo mejor tienes que modificar el makefile para que te funcione. Espero que tengas más suerte.
Re: Xcdroast in Testing error - LIBTIX4 version not found workaround ?
Wayne Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Has anyone else encountered this problem. I am running testing and find Xcdroast will not run. The error is 'LIBTIX4.8.0.1.so.1 not found' (Version No. is from memory). Has anyone else encountered this and have a work around for it. Yep. It's in the Debian bug tracking system a couple of times here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=106757repeatmerged=yes and here http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=105758repeatmerged=yes I think the only work around is to either go full-blown unstable/sid or stick with potato, or, of course, wait 'til the proper versions fall in to testing. And lastly, you could just use the command line utilities mkisofs and cdrecord which, I believe, is all that xcdroast really does. I think I tried upgrading to the tix library in sid but it had so many other sid dependencies that I didn't feel it was worth it. Gary
Re: xcdroast in sid/unstable not installable?
On Tuesday, 3. July 2001 02:12, Marc Wilson wrote: Especially since dselect doesn't, in fact, handle dependencies superior to apt, since they both use the SAME dependency mechanism. Something else is at work here. Did you, perhaps, forget to update before trying to install xcdroast, and remembered to do that when you used dselect? What ELSE did dselect decide to install on your box when you did this? - Marc Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.moonkingdom.net/mwilson Hello Marc hmmm, I deffinately did apt-get update before anything else. I remember I started dselect, without choosing any packages it wanted to INSTALL all packeges I installed in an upgrading (woody - sid) process via apt, again. I was curious but thought that apt does not update the database of dselect or whatever, so I said yes. Later I tried to install xcdroast. I had xcdroast in woody installed but didnt work (complaining about tix ). Apt just refused to install xcdroast because of dependencies (as shown below). I tried different thing without success. That was the point when I contacted the list about my problem. Joost, recommended me to use dselect. After starting it, in INSTALL where allready ~30MB of different stuff. I remember it was mainly libstuff but otheres as well (gpm, biff - and other UNWANTED stuff...). I didnt say Y at this point. I SELECTed xcdroast and went to INSTALL again. Now I had exactly the ~30MB + xcdroast nothing else. I said Y. everything is working now. tim -Original Message- From: tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 3:12 PM To: Joost Kooij Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: xcdroast in sid/unstable not installable? On Monday, 2. July 2001 18:31, Joost Kooij wrote: On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 05:25:08PM +0200, tim wrote: tim:~# apt-get install xcdroast Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done xcdroast: Conflicts: cdrecord (= 3:1.10a18.0) but 4:1.10-1 is to be installed Conflicts: mkisofs (= 3:1.10a18.0) but 4:1.10-1 is to be installed Conflicts: cdda2wav (= 3:1.10a18.0) but 4:1.10-1 is to be installed E: Sorry, broken packages Why don't you use dselect? Cheers, Joost good point! it worked. I have never paid attention to dselect since I installed debian first - a horrible experience. Since then I allways make a minimal install and apt-get what I want. But now I realized that dselect handles dependencies superior to apt. How comes i thought they use the same database. thank you!!! (a third time today) tim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast in sid/unstable not installable?
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 02:33:29PM +0200, tim wrote: On Tuesday, 3. July 2001 02:12, Marc Wilson wrote: Especially since dselect doesn't, in fact, handle dependencies superior to apt, since they both use the SAME dependency mechanism. Something else is at work here. Did you, perhaps, forget to update before trying to install xcdroast, and remembered to do that when you used dselect? What ELSE did dselect decide to install on your box when you did this? hmmm, I deffinately did apt-get update before anything else. I remember I started dselect, without choosing any packages it wanted to INSTALL all packeges I installed in an upgrading (woody - sid) process via apt, again. I was curious but thought that apt does not update the database of dselect or whatever, so I said yes. You see, apt-get does not share its database with dpkg. The canonical dpkg database is the available database. You can update is manually, with dpkg --update-avail packages-file or you can have dselect do it for you. If you never update the dpkg available database, it grows stale. An apt-get update will not update it. If it must be from the command-line, dselect update will do it. Dselect can do much more. In the package selections management screen, it verifies dependencies and allows you to readjust your selections to keep package selections consistent at a high level. Joost, recommended me to use dselect. After starting it, in INSTALL where allready ~30MB of different stuff. I remember it was mainly libstuff but otheres as well (gpm, biff - and other UNWANTED stuff...). I didnt say Y at this point. I SELECTed xcdroast and went to INSTALL again. Now I had exactly the ~30MB + xcdroast nothing else. I said Y. everything is working now. You can always go back to the package selections management screen and remove packages you don't think you need. Dselect will prompt you with the implied selections of other packages and then you can always say: no thanks, bring me back please or yes, that should go too. For the record, I'm not trying to argue that people should never use apt-get directly. It's just better to run dselect update from the command line than apt-get update, for the above reasons. And do check out the package selections management screen once in a while every so many upgrade, for your own sanity. I am not an apt-get basher. The apt access method finally made the install function in dselect robust and dependable. I vividly remember the times of the dpkg-ftp method, that ignored predepends, for example. What I do object to, is the currently popular myth among mostly poorly informed individuals, that apt-get is the doorway to slack everlasting. It is not. You can't ignore the problems that are being reported. Stop misleading the poor newbies onto the easy low road. It leads a twisted path into hell. Angels fear to tread, where fools apt-get. Use dselect instead. If you want to understand the debian package management system, read the proper manpage, dpkg(8). Cheers, Joost
Re: xcdroast in sid/unstable not installable?
On Tuesday, 3. July 2001 02:12, Marc Wilson wrote: Something else is at work here. Did you, perhaps, forget to update before trying to install xcdroast, and remembered to do that when you used dselect? What happened, of course, is that a new version of xcdroast became available while the original poster was screwing around with dselect. That's one clear advantage dselect has over apt-get -- while you are trying to figure out what is telling you, the Debian maintainers are fixing the real problem for you. (I'm trying to be funny).
Re: xcdroast in sid/unstable not installable?
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 05:25:08PM +0200, tim wrote: tim:~# apt-get install xcdroast Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: xcdroast: Conflicts: cdrecord (= 3:1.10a18.0) but 4:1.10-1 is to be installed Conflicts: mkisofs (= 3:1.10a18.0) but 4:1.10-1 is to be installed Conflicts: cdda2wav (= 3:1.10a18.0) but 4:1.10-1 is to be installed E: Sorry, broken packages Why don't you use dselect? Cheers, Joost
Re: xcdroast in sid/unstable not installable?
On Monday, 2. July 2001 18:31, Joost Kooij wrote: On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 05:25:08PM +0200, tim wrote: tim:~# apt-get install xcdroast Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done xcdroast: Conflicts: cdrecord (= 3:1.10a18.0) but 4:1.10-1 is to be installed Conflicts: mkisofs (= 3:1.10a18.0) but 4:1.10-1 is to be installed Conflicts: cdda2wav (= 3:1.10a18.0) but 4:1.10-1 is to be installed E: Sorry, broken packages Why don't you use dselect? Cheers, Joost good point! it worked. I have never paid attention to dselect since I installed debian first - a horrible experience. Since then I allways make a minimal install and apt-get what I want. But now I realized that dselect handles dependencies superior to apt. How comes i thought they use the same database. thank you!!! (a third time today) tim
RE: xcdroast in sid/unstable not installable?
Especially since dselect doesn't, in fact, handle dependencies superior to apt, since they both use the SAME dependency mechanism. Something else is at work here. Did you, perhaps, forget to update before trying to install xcdroast, and remembered to do that when you used dselect? What ELSE did dselect decide to install on your box when you did this? - Marc Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.moonkingdom.net/mwilson -Original Message- From: tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 3:12 PM To: Joost Kooij Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject:Re: xcdroast in sid/unstable not installable? On Monday, 2. July 2001 18:31, Joost Kooij wrote: On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 05:25:08PM +0200, tim wrote: tim:~# apt-get install xcdroast Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done xcdroast: Conflicts: cdrecord (= 3:1.10a18.0) but 4:1.10-1 is to be installed Conflicts: mkisofs (= 3:1.10a18.0) but 4:1.10-1 is to be installed Conflicts: cdda2wav (= 3:1.10a18.0) but 4:1.10-1 is to be installed E: Sorry, broken packages Why don't you use dselect? Cheers, Joost good point! it worked. I have never paid attention to dselect since I installed debian first - a horrible experience. Since then I allways make a minimal install and apt-get what I want. But now I realized that dselect handles dependencies superior to apt. How comes i thought they use the same database. thank you!!! (a third time today) tim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xcdroast and devfs
Yes, readcd -- Disclaimer: Do not make a copy if it is prohibited. Below is my experimental result which used Windows disk as one of the example. --- Make an image file of CD Some CD-R and commercial CD have junk sectors at the end which makes copy by dd impossible (Windows 98 CD is one of it). The cdrecord package comes with readcd command. Use this to copy any CD contents to image file. If it is a data disk, mount it and run mount to see actual size. Divide number shown (in blocks=1024byte) by 2 to get number of actual CD sectors (2048 Byte). Run readcd with option and use this disk image to burn CD-R/RW. # readcd [target] [lun] [scsibusno] # select function 11 Here, set all 3 command line parameter to 0 for most case. Sometimes number of sector given by readcd has few excess! Use above number from actual mount for better result. My CD-R = +2 sectors MS Windows CD = +1 sector, i.e., +2048 byte On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 10:57:17AM +1000, Brian May wrote: Is it possible to copy a CD using command line tools? (for legal reasons of course) Yes, of course. Licensing of software does not expire when I accidentally dropped CD :-) -- ~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ + Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED], GnuPG-key: 1024D/D5DE453D + + For more debian survival information, peek into: + + http://www.aokiconsulting.com/debian-survival/ +
Re: xcdroast and devfs
Quoth Brian May, Is it possible to copy a CD using command line tools? (for legal reasons of course) If it's a data CD, just create an image with: dd if=/dev/cdrom of=/tmp/image.iso then write it with cdrecord. I believe it's actually possible to have the output piped directly to cdrecord, but I don't know the switches off the top of my head. Also creating the image first is less likely to result in a coaster. If it's a music CD, use cdparanoia (from the people who later bought us ogg vorbis), then cdrecord. Or use cdrao (or something like that). Personally, when I have used cd burners, usually I'll use gcombust, which works well. I started off with command line tools, however, and they work well. HTH, damon -- Damon Muller | Did a large procession wave their torches Criminologist/Linux Geek | As my head fell in the basket, http://killfilter.com | And was everybody dancing on the casket... PGP (GnuPG): A136E829 | - TBMG, Dead
