Re: Request virtualbox setup advice

2015-08-22 Thread T. J. Duchene
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 15:56:39 -0400
Whit Hansell skippe...@comcast.net wrote:

 Hey guys,
 Been reading the virtual noob posts and a statement there intrigued
 me. Someone said Oracle recommended using the virtualbox files from
 their site rather than from the distro(Debian 8 - Jessie-AMD64).  I
 have used virtualbox in the past and had difficulty with I/O(usb) and
 found out about the PUELA file and then before I could do anything
 about it my HD failed.  Well, I'm up and running again, have tried
 the distro version w. the PUELA extension and on my W7 guest I end up
 with the CPU pegged at 100% a few minutes after starting it up.  That
 just isn't right.  I think but am not sure it has to do w. my usb
 webcam but not sure. Anyway, want to start over and have the best
 foundation possible in order to reduce the variables with possible
 problems later.  So I feel the Oracle software sitauation is the way
 to go.
 
 So I am interested in using Oracle's files and have questions.
 
 I can as recommended on the Oracle site, add Oracle to my sources
 list file and the keyring.  Have done similar w. multimedia w. no
 problems. But since I have virtualbox 4.3.x files on the distro, will
 the first update I do after I do the above, just add another set of
 virtualbox files of the newer 5.x.x versions, leaving the lower
 versions alone?  Or will it cause a conflict?  I would guess it
 should be OK but wanted to check first before I hose things up.
 
 OR
 
 I can download the Jessie version 5.x.x .deb file and stick it into
 my usr/loca/ directory and then have to mess around with manual
 updating whenever Oracle comes out with a newer version.
 
 Please advise.  I would love to have a good working version of
 Windows on my Linux box for the few times it is needed.
 
 Thanks in advxnce for your help.  You guys are great.
 
 Whit
 

Not that I am trying to muddle the issue, Whit, but in my experience
the VirtualBox guest drivers are terrible.  You can't easily resize disk
files,  and the relative performance is poor.  I've entirely dropped
using it in favor of KVM, and I'm only suggesting that you consider it.

 Most Linux kernels already have KVM support. You don't have to
 concern myself with Oracle's schedules.  If you have the hardware, you
 can use video passthrough and optimizations to get near
 90-95% of native speed - which is much better and far more compatible
 than VirtualBox.

Take care!
T.J.


  



Re: Request virtualbox setup advice

2015-08-21 Thread Eike Lantzsch
On Friday 21 August 2015 10:33:23 Lisi Reisz wrote:
 On Thursday 20 August 2015 20:56:39 Whit Hansell wrote:
  Please advise.  I would love to have a good working version of Windows
  on my Linux box for the few times it is needed.
 
 I personally would avoid all risk of conflict and purge VB with your package
 manager of choice before installing the upstream version.
 
 In my experience one needs (I needed) the upstream guest additions.
 
 Lisi

Hi:
I couldn't test VBox5.0 on Jessie - that might work but if you already 
upgraded Jessie to Testing than you run into problems with libvpx1. It has no 
install candidate in Testing because libvpx2 is part of Testing.
The best bet might be to stay with Jessie as host system and install Testing 
in a virtual machine to keep track of the gcc5 transition.
Well - all depends on what you are up to ...

Cheers
Eike



Re: Request virtualbox setup advice

2015-08-21 Thread Whit Hansell



On 08/21/2015 09:00 AM, Eike Lantzsch wrote:

On Friday 21 August 2015 10:33:23 Lisi Reisz wrote:

On Thursday 20 August 2015 20:56:39 Whit Hansell wrote:

Please advise.  I would love to have a good working version of Windows
on my Linux box for the few times it is needed.

I personally would avoid all risk of conflict and purge VB with your package
manager of choice before installing the upstream version.

In my experience one needs (I needed) the upstream guest additions.

Lisi

Hi:
I couldn't test VBox5.0 on Jessie - that might work but if you already
upgraded Jessie to Testing than you run into problems with libvpx1. It has no
install candidate in Testing because libvpx2 is part of Testing.
The best bet might be to stay with Jessie as host system and install Testing
in a virtual machine to keep track of the gcc5 transition.
Well - all depends on what you are up to ...

Cheers
Eike



Hi Eike,
Thanks for repllying.  am not using testing at all.  When my old HD 
died, I bought a 1 Tb dirive and installed Jessie stable from scratch 
using netinstall.  Checked virtualbox site and it recommends for Jessie 
virtualbox 5.0.2 which is the latest, I guess, stable version of 
Virtualbox as it is also recommended for Wheezy too.  Not planning on 
going to testing w. these newer often changing Linux systems.  I had 
used testing in the pas thru squeeze.  But when Wheezy came out I 
started using stable because of the major changes being made to the 
kernel and system.


Thanks for replying and the help.  Appreciate it a bunch.
Regards,
whit



Re: Request virtualbox setup advice

2015-08-21 Thread Whit Hansell



On 08/21/2015 05:33 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:

On Thursday 20 August 2015 20:56:39 Whit Hansell wrote:

Please advise.  I would love to have a good working version of Windows
on my Linux box for the few times it is needed.

I personally would avoid all risk of conflict and purge VB with your package
manager of choice before installing the upstream version.

In my experience one needs (I needed) the upstream guest additions.

Lisi




Thank you for replying, Lisi.  I agree w. purging the already installed 
files.  Have done so just this AM.  Am in process of setting up sources 
list entry and keyring, etc now.  Thanks for the reply and reminder


Whit



Re: Request virtualbox setup advice

2015-08-21 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Thursday 20 August 2015 20:56:39 Whit Hansell wrote:
 Please advise.  I would love to have a good working version of Windows
 on my Linux box for the few times it is needed.

I personally would avoid all risk of conflict and purge VB with your package 
manager of choice before installing the upstream version.  

In my experience one needs (I needed) the upstream guest additions. 

Lisi



Request virtualbox setup advice

2015-08-20 Thread Whit Hansell

Hey guys,
Been reading the virtual noob posts and a statement there intrigued me.  
Someone said Oracle recommended using the virtualbox files from their 
site rather than from the distro(Debian 8 - Jessie-AMD64).  I have used 
virtualbox in the past and had difficulty with I/O(usb) and found out 
about the PUELA file and then before I could do anything about it my HD 
failed.  Well, I'm up and running again, have tried the distro version 
w. the PUELA extension and on my W7 guest I end up with the CPU pegged 
at 100% a few minutes after starting it up.  That just isn't right.  I 
think but am not sure it has to do w. my usb webcam but not sure.  
Anyway, want to start over and have the best foundation possible in 
order to reduce the variables with possible problems later.  So I feel 
the Oracle software sitauation is the way to go.


So I am interested in using Oracle's files and have questions.

I can as recommended on the Oracle site, add Oracle to my sources list 
file and the keyring.  Have done similar w. multimedia w. no problems.  
But since I have virtualbox 4.3.x files on the distro, will the first 
update I do after I do the above, just add another set of virtualbox 
files of the newer 5.x.x versions, leaving the lower versions alone?  Or 
will it cause a conflict?  I would guess it should be OK but wanted to 
check first before I hose things up.


OR

I can download the Jessie version 5.x.x .deb file and stick it into my 
usr/loca/ directory and then have to mess around with manual updating 
whenever Oracle comes out with a newer version.


Please advise.  I would love to have a good working version of Windows 
on my Linux box for the few times it is needed.


Thanks in advxnce for your help.  You guys are great.

Whit