Re: Resier-FS and nfs.

[forum]

>   Any comments? Do the other journaling fs better then reiser when nfs,
> lvm and quotas support are the _main criteria_ for choosing the fs?

I'd say that the main attraction of reiserfs is the particularly noticable 
improvement it offers for speed and storage space used by many small files.

I use reiserfs on all my database partitions, but why not stick to something 
simple like ext2 if you want quotas etc.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Resier-FS and nfs.

[Shaul Karl]

  2.6.4's CONFIG_REISERFS_FS says that

Additional patches are needed for NFS and quotas, please see
 for links.

I couldn't find those links. Perhaps I didn't search throughly. In 
addition, a quick googling suggests that there are/were issues with the
triplet {nfs, lvm, journaling fs}.

  Any comments? Do the other journaling fs better then reiser when nfs,
lvm and quotas support are the _main criteria_ for choosing the fs?

-- 
"If you have an apple and I have  an apple and we  exchange apples then
you and I will still each have  one apple. But  if you have an idea and I
have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two
ideas." -- George Bernard Shaw (sent by  shaulk @ actcom . net . il)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]