Re: Still looking to replace Eudora

2002-03-12 Thread O Polite
On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 17:30, Brian Stults wrote:

 Did you install all the dependencies (e.g. aspell, pspell) and a
 dictionary?

Thanks. That did the trick.

op

-- 
http://plusseven.com/gpg/



Re: Still looking to replace Eudora

2002-03-12 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Mon, Mar 11, 2002, csj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Sat, 9 Mar 2002 23:28:31 -0800
 Karsten M. Self kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
 
   In general, I find the MDI paradigm to be frustrating to the extreme,
   and the alternatives provided by GNU/Linux are far superior (IMVAO).
 
 Then why do you continuously plug galeon? ;-)

Winks aside, there's a distinction.

MDI is often applied to applications in which there is significant
authoring activity.  Examples most users would be familiar with would
include MS Word, MS Excel, etc.  One particular instance I'm familiar
with is SAS, which includes an IDE type getup -- there's a program
editor, a log window (programming, error, debugging output), and a
list window (reports output).  Under Unix, the windows are free-form
and may be placed at any place on the desktop.  Under MS Legacy MS
Windows, they're all stuck in this stupid _box_ you can't get rid of.
At the same time, there's a lot of work involving reading or copying out
of one window and writing into another.

You're also likely dealing primarially with a small number of documents
or equivalents.  The framing is (IMVAO) not necessary for organization.

Galeon is (mostly) a _browsing_ application.  While some websites allow
for input (and I'm using web-based tools more frequently these days),
the principle actions are:

  - Search for a website.
  - Open a website.
  - Open links within a page.
  - Pursue some other vein of thought.

What galeon offers is choice:  you can stack a bunch of pages together
in a single window (not contained loosely within it in the MDI style,
but tabbed within a frame).  Or you can arrange them as fully separate
windows.  And you can switch a given page between the two choices,
detaching it from a tabbed view, or adding it to another window's
tab(s).  While it's possible to focus on a single document when browsing
the Web, I find I'm far more likely to be scanning a larger number --
five pages would be a small browsing session, 20-40 typical, and 100 or
more pages (5-8 windows of 12-20 tabs) is not unheard of.

FWIW, I also like and use 'screen' extensively, a terminal / console
multiplexer.  It (generally) follows a similar mode of restricting the
user to viewing one session at a time, but still can be extremely
useful.  I find it indespensible.  One application I've got is based on
a set of shell wrappers to launch xterm with screen, with w3m as a
shell, wrapped to default to opening to a bookmarks page (it's a lot
easier to use than it is to describe).  The result is, approximately, a
tabbed, text-mode browser.  Damned useful stuff.

Peace.

-- 
Karsten M. Self kmself@ix.netcom.comhttp://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What part of Gestalt don't you understand?   There is no K5 cabal
  http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ http://www.kuro5hin.org



pgpNNS4V1fvqh.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Still looking to replace Eudora

2002-03-10 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Thu, Mar 07, 2002, Bill Moseley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Thursday 07 March 2002 07:01 pm, Eric G. Miller wrote:

  The window(s) within a containing window paradigm is generally not
  found in X programs.  I don't think it's even part of most (any?)
  toolkits.
 
 That's what I wondered.  
 
 I'll try the trick of using a separate desktop for my mail.  So far,
 with multiple windows, it gets cluttered too fast.  The
 windows-inside-a-window thing was nice in Eudora -- let me have a real
 messy email window that could all be moved as a single unit.

The solution to this under GNU/Linux is generally some form of window
association.  This varies by window manager, Sawfish has some fairly
complex window grouping capabilities though I'm not familiar with them.
Under WindowMaker (my WM), it's possible to work with entire sets of
windows associated with a given application.  The hide, unhide here,
and bring here functions are particularly useful.

In general, I find the MDI paradigm to be frustrating to the extreme,
and the alternatives provided by GNU/Linux are far superior (IMVAO).

Peace.

-- 
Karsten M. Self kmself@ix.netcom.comhttp://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What part of Gestalt don't you understand?   There is no K5 cabal
  http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ http://www.kuro5hin.org



pgpBsnYkyfJ5B.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Still looking to replace Eudora

2002-03-10 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Fri, Mar 08, 2002, O Polite ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 04:01, Eric G. Miller wrote:
  The window(s) within a containing window paradigm is generally not found
  in X programs.  I don't think it's even part of most (any?) toolkits.
  
 When I first moved to linux I tried out StarOffice, which put all it's
 windows in one desktop window. That was one of the reasons I didn't
 stick with StarOffice. The main reason however was that is was extremely
 sluggish and unstable. This was a long time ago so maybe that has all
 changed.

OO has removed the single desktop.  It's not fixed (appreciably) the
sluggishness and general feelings of bloat I get with SO.  Despite my
desire to *want* to like this application, I really, really, hate it.

Thank $FNORD I managed to get through this post without saying
StarOffice, that bloated stuck pig of an office suite

Peace.

-- 
Karsten M. Self kmself@ix.netcom.comhttp://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What part of Gestalt don't you understand?   There is no K5 cabal
  http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ http://www.kuro5hin.org



pgpeKe83yCDOI.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Still looking to replace Eudora

2002-03-10 Thread csj
On Sat, 9 Mar 2002 23:28:31 -0800
Karsten M. Self kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:

  In general, I find the MDI paradigm to be frustrating to the extreme,
  and the alternatives provided by GNU/Linux are far superior (IMVAO).

Then why do you continuously plug galeon? ;-)



Re: Still looking to replace Eudora

2002-03-08 Thread Craig Dickson
begin  Eric G. Miller  quotation:

 On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 05:11:12PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:

  I just didn't realize how set in my ways I am.
  
  I've tried for X: Kmail, Evolution, Sylpheed, and Mahogany.  Something
  else I can't remember.  They all seem fine.
  
  Maybe it's a config setting I've missed, but what I miss is having the
  messages open in their own windows (yet still inside the main Eudora
  window).  The reason is I like to work with my mail as a single unit
  (single window), but I like to keep a bunch of messages open at the
  same time that I'm working on.
 
 The window(s) within a containing window paradigm is generally not found
 in X programs.  I don't think it's even part of most (any?) toolkits.

If he's referring to the MS Windows Multiple Document Interface (MDI),
you don't even find that in most Windows programs anymore. Microsoft
promoted it back in the Windows 3.x period, but it is conspicuous by its
absence in the Windows 95+/NT4+ interfaces. Compare the MDI-based
Windows 3.x File Manager with the Windows 95+ Explorer, where you open
separate windows if you want to see two directories at once.

Craig


pgp8WlIAJNlIC.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Still looking to replace Eudora

2002-03-08 Thread Bill Moseley
On Thursday 07 March 2002 07:01 pm, Eric G. Miller wrote:
 On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 05:11:12PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:

  Maybe it's a config setting I've missed, but what I miss is having the
  messages open in their own windows (yet still inside the main Eudora
  window).  The reason is I like to work with my mail as a single unit
  (single window), but I like to keep a bunch of messages open at the
  same time that I'm working on.

 The window(s) within a containing window paradigm is generally not found
 in X programs.  I don't think it's even part of most (any?) toolkits.

That's what I wondered.  

I'll try the trick of using a separate desktop for my mail.  So far, with 
multiple windows, it gets cluttered too fast.  The windows-inside-a-window 
thing was nice in Eudora -- let me have a real messy email window that could 
all be moved as a single unit.

I'll get used to it.

Thanks for everyone's time.


-- 
Bill Moseley



Re: Still looking to replace Eudora

2002-03-08 Thread Joe
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 08:53:17PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
 begin  Eric G. Miller  quotation:
 
  On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 05:11:12PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
 
   I just didn't realize how set in my ways I am.
   
   I've tried for X: Kmail, Evolution, Sylpheed, and Mahogany.  Something
   else I can't remember.  They all seem fine.
   
   Maybe it's a config setting I've missed, but what I miss is having the
   messages open in their own windows (yet still inside the main Eudora
   window).  The reason is I like to work with my mail as a single unit
   (single window), but I like to keep a bunch of messages open at the
   same time that I'm working on.
  
  The window(s) within a containing window paradigm is generally not found
  in X programs.  I don't think it's even part of most (any?) toolkits.
 
 If he's referring to the MS Windows Multiple Document Interface (MDI),
 you don't even find that in most Windows programs anymore. Microsoft
 promoted it back in the Windows 3.x period, but it is conspicuous by its
 absence in the Windows 95+/NT4+ interfaces. Compare the MDI-based
 Windows 3.x File Manager with the Windows 95+ Explorer, where you open
 separate windows if you want to see two directories at once.
 

I'm not entirely familiar with this MDI interface, and my examples are
probably built a little outside the standard X toolkits, but what 
about the tabs in Mozilla, Galeon,  Opera? In Opera they can be tiled
or cascaded within the main Opera window. Not sure if Mozilla Mail can
do that.

but I'm pretty sure Mutt won't!

-CraigW



Re: Still looking to replace Eudora

2002-03-08 Thread O Polite
On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 04:01, Eric G. Miller wrote:
 The window(s) within a containing window paradigm is generally not found
 in X programs.  I don't think it's even part of most (any?) toolkits.
 
When I first moved to linux I tried out StarOffice, which put all it's
windows in one desktop window. That was one of the reasons I didn't
stick with StarOffice. The main reason however was that is was extremely
sluggish and unstable. This was a long time ago so maybe that has all
changed.

Pardon my English, speling is broken in Evolution.




Re: Still looking to replace Eudora

2002-03-08 Thread Brian Stults
On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 04:59, O Polite wrote:
 
 Pardon my English, speling is broken in Evolution.
 

Search the web for the unofficial debian package for gnome-spell. 
Install it and spell-checking in evolution will work.


-- 
Brian J. Stults
Department of Sociology
University of Florida
P.O. Box 117330
Gainesville, Florida 32611-7330
phone:  (352) 392-0265 x286
fax:(352) 392-6568 
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Still looking to replace Eudora

2002-03-08 Thread Michel Loos
On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 03:23, Bill Moseley wrote:
 On Thursday 07 March 2002 07:01 pm, Eric G. Miller wrote:
  On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 05:11:12PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
 
   Maybe it's a config setting I've missed, but what I miss is having the
   messages open in their own windows (yet still inside the main Eudora
   window).  The reason is I like to work with my mail as a single unit
   (single window), but I like to keep a bunch of messages open at the
   same time that I'm working on.
 
  The window(s) within a containing window paradigm is generally not found
  in X programs.  I don't think it's even part of most (any?) toolkits.
 
 That's what I wondered.  
 
 I'll try the trick of using a separate desktop for my mail.  So far, with 
 multiple windows, it gets cluttered too fast.  The windows-inside-a-window 
 thing was nice in Eudora -- let me have a real messy email window that could 
 all be moved as a single unit.
 

Just wondering: what do you prefer when displaying window in window over
the preview in the lower part of the evolution window ?

Michel.

 I'll get used to it.
 
 Thanks for everyone's time.
 
 
 -- 
 Bill Moseley
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 




Re: Still looking to replace Eudora

2002-03-08 Thread Jorge Escalante
Have you tried balsa? It's the one I use and it's not bad.


On Thu, 07 Mar 2002 20:11:12 Bill Moseley wrote:
 I just didn't realize how set in my ways I am.
 
 I've tried for X: Kmail, Evolution, Sylpheed, and Mahogany.  Something else 
I 
 can't remember.  They all seem fine.
 
 Maybe it's a config setting I've missed, but what I miss is having the 
 messages open in their own windows (yet still inside the main Eudora 
window). 
 The reason is I like to work with my mail as a single unit (single window), 
 but I like to keep a bunch of messages open at the same time that I'm 
working 
 on.
 
 Do any mail clients work that way?
 
 I do realize that I can open a new mail client with Kmail.
 
 I'm sure I can learn new ways, but that's been what I've missed the most in 
 my change to linux on the desktop.  I suppose I could dedicate a separate 
 desktop to mail.
 
 Evolution keeps crashing on Sid, for me.
 
 Thanks,
 
 --
 Bill Moseley
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

My Computer's Opinion
~~
if( desire == play_games() ){return getNintendo64();}
if( (desire == computing() ) (user != smart) ) {return getMicrosoft();}
if( ( desire == computing() )(user == smart) ){return getLinux();}



Re: Still looking to replace Eudora

2002-03-08 Thread O Polite

On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 12:48, Brian Stults wrote:
 Search the web for the unofficial debian package for gnome-spell. 
 Install it and spell-checking in evolution will work.
 

http://www.luyer.net/EvoBuilds/spell-checking/gnome-spell_0.3-0_i386.deb

Thes unofisial package installles nisely. And is allso a reel eggo
boster, kause it didnt finnd a cingle speling eror in this dockument! 

Am I missing something? Some hidden setting somewhere?

o polite






Re: Still looking to replace Eudora

2002-03-08 Thread Brian Stults
On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 10:19, O Polite wrote:
 
 On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 12:48, Brian Stults wrote:
  Search the web for the unofficial debian package for gnome-spell. 
  Install it and spell-checking in evolution will work.
  
 
 http://www.luyer.net/EvoBuilds/spell-checking/gnome-spell_0.3-0_i386.deb
 
 Thes unofisial package installles nisely. And is allso a reel eggo
 boster, kause it didnt finnd a cingle speling eror in this dockument! 
 
 Am I missing something? Some hidden setting somewhere?
 

I think it runs by default once you install the package.  At least
that's how it works for me.  When I cut and paste your message into a
new message, it detects all the misspellings.

Did you install all the dependencies (e.g. aspell, pspell) and a
dictionary?

-- 
Brian J. Stults
Department of Sociology
University of Florida
P.O. Box 117330
Gainesville, Florida 32611-7330
phone:  (352) 392-0265 x286
fax:(352) 392-6568 
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Still looking to replace Eudora

2002-03-08 Thread Ron Johnson
On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 10:30, Brian Stults wrote:
 On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 10:19, O Polite wrote:
  
  On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 12:48, Brian Stults wrote:
   Search the web for the unofficial debian package for gnome-spell. 
   Install it and spell-checking in evolution will work.
   
  
  http://www.luyer.net/EvoBuilds/spell-checking/gnome-spell_0.3-0_i386.deb
  
  Thes unofisial package installles nisely. And is allso a reel eggo
  boster, kause it didnt finnd a cingle speling eror in this dockument! 
  
  Am I missing something? Some hidden setting somewhere?
  
 
 I think it runs by default once you install the package.  At least
 that's how it works for me.  When I cut and paste your message into a
 new message, it detects all the misspellings.
 
 Did you install all the dependencies (e.g. aspell, pspell) and a
 dictionary?

Hi,

These are the official packages that are installed on my machine:
aspell-en   0.33.7.1-8   English dictionary for aspell
dict1.5.5-7  Dictionary Client
wenglish2.0-2English dictionary 
aspell  0.33.7.1-8   A more intelligent replacement for the 
 ispell spell checker
aspell-en   0.33.7.1-8   English dictionary for aspell
gaspell 0.30-10  Gnome front end to the aspell spell checker
libaspell10 0.33.7.1-8   The aspell spell checker runtime libraries.
libpspell4  0.12.2-5 Portable spell checker interface library

In addition to these, are you all (O  Brian) saying that I need 
the unofficial gnome-spell package?

_Why_ is gnome-spell not an official package?

Thanks,
Ron
-- 
++
| Ron Johnson, Jr.Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| Jefferson, LA  USA  http://ronandheather.dhs.org:81|
||
| (Women are) like compilers.  They take simple statements  |
|  and make them into big productions.  |
| Pitr Dubovitch |
++



Still looking to replace Eudora

2002-03-07 Thread Bill Moseley
I just didn't realize how set in my ways I am.

I've tried for X: Kmail, Evolution, Sylpheed, and Mahogany.  Something else I 
can't remember.  They all seem fine.

Maybe it's a config setting I've missed, but what I miss is having the 
messages open in their own windows (yet still inside the main Eudora window). 
The reason is I like to work with my mail as a single unit (single window), 
but I like to keep a bunch of messages open at the same time that I'm working 
on.

Do any mail clients work that way?

I do realize that I can open a new mail client with Kmail.

I'm sure I can learn new ways, but that's been what I've missed the most in 
my change to linux on the desktop.  I suppose I could dedicate a separate 
desktop to mail.

Evolution keeps crashing on Sid, for me.

Thanks,

--
Bill Moseley



Re: Still looking to replace Eudora

2002-03-07 Thread Arthur H. Johnson II
Double click on the email in evolution.  That opens it in its own
window, as well as in the origional parent window.
On Thu, 2002-03-07 at 20:11, Bill Moseley wrote:
 I just didn't realize how set in my ways I am.
 
 I've tried for X: Kmail, Evolution, Sylpheed, and Mahogany.  Something else I 
 can't remember.  They all seem fine.
 
 Maybe it's a config setting I've missed, but what I miss is having the 
 messages open in their own windows (yet still inside the main Eudora window). 
 The reason is I like to work with my mail as a single unit (single window), 
 but I like to keep a bunch of messages open at the same time that I'm working 
 on.
 
 Do any mail clients work that way?
 
 I do realize that I can open a new mail client with Kmail.
 
 I'm sure I can learn new ways, but that's been what I've missed the most in 
 my change to linux on the desktop.  I suppose I could dedicate a separate 
 desktop to mail.
 
 Evolution keeps crashing on Sid, for me.
 
 Thanks,
 
 --
 Bill Moseley
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
-- 
Arthur H. Johnson II
President, Genesee County Linux Users Group
Debian GNU/Linux Advocate
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.gclug.org
-- 
Don't try to outweird me, three-eyes.  I get stranger
things than you free with my breakfast cereal.
- Zaphod Beeblebrox in Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy



Re: Still looking to replace Eudora

2002-03-07 Thread Eric G. Miller
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 05:11:12PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
 I just didn't realize how set in my ways I am.
 
 I've tried for X: Kmail, Evolution, Sylpheed, and Mahogany.  Something
 else I can't remember.  They all seem fine.
 
 Maybe it's a config setting I've missed, but what I miss is having the
 messages open in their own windows (yet still inside the main Eudora
 window).  The reason is I like to work with my mail as a single unit
 (single window), but I like to keep a bunch of messages open at the
 same time that I'm working on.

The window(s) within a containing window paradigm is generally not found
in X programs.  I don't think it's even part of most (any?) toolkits.

-- 
Eric G. Miller egm2@jps.net