Re: W32/Myparty
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Jeremy Gaddis wrote: where did you extract from any part of my post to the list that i welcome replies to my address? post it to the list, or not at all. unless someone indicates that they want you to cc: to their address, have some manners--don't do it. especially, now that you know that i do not want you to cc: to may address, don't do it again. How's this you fucking bitch? Both of you, stop being so rude. Ben, if you don't want private email, either put a disclaimer on your mail or don't subscribe to lists. -- Baloo
Re: W32/Myparty
Paul 'Baloo' Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Jeremy Gaddis wrote: where did you extract from any part of my post to the list that i welcome replies to my address? post it to the list, or not at all. unless someone indicates that they want you to cc: to their address, have some manners--don't do it. especially, now that you know that i do not want you to cc: to may address, don't do it again. How's this you fucking bitch? Both of you, stop being so rude. Ben, if you don't want private email, either put a disclaimer on your mail or don't subscribe to lists. No, you use a Mail-Copies-To: never or Mail-Copies-To: nobody header and then any halfway decent mail client will honor that. If it doesn't, then it shouldn't be used to reply to mailing lists. -- Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: W32/Myparty
On Saturday 09 February 2002 11:45 am, Brian Nelson wrote: Paul 'Baloo' Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Jeremy Gaddis wrote: where did you extract from any part of my post to the list that i welcome replies to my address? post it to the list, or not at all. unless someone indicates that they want you to cc: to their address, have some manners--don't do it. especially, now that you know that i do not want you to cc: to may address, don't do it again. How's this you fucking bitch? Both of you, stop being so rude. Ben, if you don't want private email, either put a disclaimer on your mail or don't subscribe to lists. No, you use a Mail-Copies-To: never or Mail-Copies-To: nobody header and then any halfway decent mail client will honor that. If it doesn't, then it shouldn't be used to reply to mailing lists. alright. in order to close this, let me explain the circumstances around it. normally, if someone responds to me offlist, whether by cc'ing a list response or otherwise, if i'm willing to carry on the discussion off list, i do. if i'm not, i generally send a polite response asking them to keep it on the list and not cc my address. given the nature of the communication above with mr. gaddis, the response he got was, admittedly, not as polite as usual, and was an indulgence on my part. however, that response was sent to his private address in response to a reply sent to mine. i did not post it to the list as, to my mind, it had, at least until gaddis posted it here, nothing to do with the business of the list. i hope that's clear to those who've taken the time to offer solutions as to how i should deal with cc'ed list postings. to give gaddis credit, he did honor the request, and hasn't cc'ed me since then. as for what i should do with headers or disclaimers, i think that the previous method of a polite response requesting not to be cc'ed actually works, since, on occasion, it's beneficial to take a discussion offlist. thanks for the helpful suggestions.
Re: W32/Myparty
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, csj wrote: On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 21:06:52 -0500 Jeremy Gaddis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gary, I also run Free Agent, though just for the newsgroups. My MUA of choice is Outlook (no flames please, I'm tired of them) and I have actually never had any problems with it. I do virus scanning on the mail gateway, before it even gets to reaching Outlook and by disabling a majority of attachments (.doc, .vbs, etc.) it isn't too much to worry about. Wouldn't it be nicer if you didn't have to scan email? Email viruses shouldn't exist in the first place. They're a totally unnecessary evil (unlike trojan horses and boot-sector viruses), Sure. And wouldn't it be nice if none of us had to lock our doors, put bars over our windows, or install burglar alarms on our homes? In a perfect world... This isn't a perfect world. You are obviously content with your mail setup, I'm content with mine. Deal with it. j. -- Jeremy L. Gaddis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: W32/Myparty
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Jeremy Gaddis wrote: And wouldn't it be nice if none of us had to lock our doors, put bars over our windows, or install burglar alarms on our homes? In a perfect world... I live in a rough part of Portland and I never lock the doors or the car (and thanks to my roommate loosing my car keys at @Home Beaverton on his last day of work before starting a new job, I had to remove the ignition lock, not a pretty sight. It starts with a screwdriver. But then again, who's going to steal a 1984 Buick Skylark with a YARD DEBRIS ONLY recycling can sticker, Friends don't let friends use AOL bumpersticker and metric instrumentation and 219,000 kilometers on it in Oregon?) Oh yeah, don't move to Oregon. Portland's full and we have millitant rednecks, in central/eastern Oregon, its always dark and raining, and traffic's so bad public transit will get you anywhere faster than driving usually. 8:oP -- Baloo
Re: W32/Myparty
On Friday 08 February 2002 06:33 am, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote: On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Jeremy Gaddis wrote: And wouldn't it be nice if none of us had to lock our doors, put bars over our windows, or install burglar alarms on our homes? In a perfect world... I live in a rough part of Portland and I never lock the doors or the car (and thanks to my roommate loosing my car keys at @Home Beaverton on his last day of work before starting a new job, I had to remove the ignition lock, not a pretty sight. It starts with a screwdriver. But then again, who's going to steal a 1984 Buick Skylark with a YARD DEBRIS ONLY recycling can sticker, Friends don't let friends use AOL bumpersticker and metric instrumentation and 219,000 kilometers on it in Oregon?) Oh yeah, don't move to Oregon. Portland's full and we have millitant rednecks, in central/eastern Oregon, its always dark and raining, and traffic's so bad public transit will get you anywhere faster than driving usually. 8:oP no wonder portland's full; it sounds perfect. btw, living in fear is a common side effect of using all windon't apps. i mean, let's be fair; he's not just wrong about the mailer.
Re: W32/Myparty
Quoting ben [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Friday 08 February 2002 06:33 am, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote: On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Jeremy Gaddis wrote: And wouldn't it be nice if none of us had to lock our doors, put bars over our windows, or install burglar alarms on our homes? In a perfect world... I live in a rough part of Portland and I never lock the doors or the car (and thanks to my roommate loosing my car keys at @Home Beaverton on his last day of work before starting a new job, I had to remove the ignition lock, not a pretty sight. It starts with a screwdriver. But then again, who's going to steal a 1984 Buick Skylark with a YARD DEBRIS ONLY recycling can sticker, Friends don't let friends use AOL bumpersticker and metric instrumentation and 219,000 kilometers on it in Oregon?) Oh yeah, don't move to Oregon. Portland's full and we have millitant rednecks, in central/eastern Oregon, its always dark and raining, and traffic's so bad public transit will get you anywhere faster than driving usually. 8:oP no wonder portland's full; it sounds perfect. btw, living in fear is a common side effect of using all windon't apps. i mean, let's be fair; he's not just wrong about the mailer. Excuse me? Living in fear? Fear of what? I'm not in fear of anything regarding my Windows machines. j. -- Jeremy L. Gaddis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: W32/Myparty
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002 01:07:52 -0500 (EST) Jeremy Gaddis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, csj wrote: On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 21:06:52 -0500 Jeremy Gaddis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] Wouldn't it be nicer if you didn't have to scan email? Email viruses shouldn't exist in the first place. They're a totally unnecessary evil (unlike trojan horses and boot-sector viruses), Sure. And wouldn't it be nice if none of us had to lock our doors, put bars over our windows, or install burglar alarms on our homes? In a perfect world... This isn't a perfect world. You are obviously content with your mail setup, I'm content with mine. Deal with it. I've dealt with it. -- Humanity's future is in the stars: support a manned mission to Mars! http://www.thinkmars.net/petition/addpetition.html
Re: W32/Myparty
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, ben wrote: where did you extract from any part of my post to the list that i welcome replies to my address? post it to the list, or not at all. unless someone indicates that they want you to cc: to their address, have some manners--don't do it. especially, now that you know that i do not want you to cc: to may address, don't do it again. How's this you fucking bitch? j. -- Jeremy L. Gaddis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: W32/Myparty
On Friday 08 February 2002 04:07 pm, Jeremy Gaddis wrote: On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, ben wrote: where did you extract from any part of my post to the list that i welcome replies to my address? post it to the list, or not at all. unless someone indicates that they want you to cc: to their address, have some manners--don't do it. especially, now that you know that i do not want you to cc: to may address, don't do it again. How's this you fucking bitch? j. might be time to get back on the meds, gladys
Re: W32/Myparty
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 03:32:59AM +0800, csj wrote: | On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 21:06:52 -0500 | Jeremy Gaddis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | Gary, | | I also run Free Agent, though just for the newsgroups. | My MUA of choice is Outlook (no flames please, I'm tired | of them) and I have actually never had any problems with | it. I do virus scanning on the mail gateway, before it | even gets to reaching Outlook and by disabling a majority | of attachments (.doc, .vbs, etc.) it isn't too much to | worry about. | | Wouldn't it be nicer if you didn't have to scan email? Email viruses | shouldn't exist in the first place. They're a totally unnecessary evil Hear, hear. | (unlike trojan horses and boot-sector viruses), Are lilo and grub names of boot-sector virii? ;-) -D -- In the way of righteousness there is life; along that path is immortality. Proverbs 12:28
Re: W32/Myparty
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 21:06:52 -0500 Jeremy Gaddis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gary, I also run Free Agent, though just for the newsgroups. My MUA of choice is Outlook (no flames please, I'm tired of them) and I have actually never had any problems with it. I do virus scanning on the mail gateway, before it even gets to reaching Outlook and by disabling a majority of attachments (.doc, .vbs, etc.) it isn't too much to worry about. Wouldn't it be nicer if you didn't have to scan email? Email viruses shouldn't exist in the first place. They're a totally unnecessary evil (unlike trojan horses and boot-sector viruses), -- Humanity's future is in the stars: support a manned mission to Mars! http://www.thinkmars.net/petition/addpetition.html
Re: W32/Myparty
On Fri, 01 Feb 2002 09:18:44 +0100, Chris Mueller wrote: At 00:11 -0500 01.02.2002, Jeremy L. Gaddis wrote: Are you saying that when I decide to read the debian-* lists I'm subscribed to, I should close Outlook, ... For your own advantage you should close Outlook - for ever. And switch to Eudora. Under Win oder Mac. Since Eudora is a separate programm and not so closely connected to the WinOS, viruses can' get active that easily, e.g. vbs-attachments. ... May I suggest Forte' Agent for mail on a Win box? It is text based, will let you inspect attachments/html in raw form, and will warn and query you should you try to open an executable. I've been using it for 2 years now and if there is a reason not to, I haven't run into it. You can download a free version called Free Agent. I think the news reader is crippled on the free version. I don't know if it runs ads. My mail will have to come through a Win machine for a while yet, so Agent is my protection against hostile email. I tried Eudora, but, for some reason I can't recall, it didn't thrill me. Yes I fear I am living beyond my mental means--Nash
Re: W32/Myparty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 05 February 2002 4:19 pm, Gary Turner wrote: May I suggest Forte' Agent for mail on a Win box? It is text based, will let you inspect attachments/html in raw form, and will warn and query you should you try to open an executable. I've been using it for 2 years now and if there is a reason not to, I haven't run into it. You can download a free version called Free Agent. I think the news reader is crippled on the free version. I don't know if it runs ads. Unfortunately, I think you have it the wrong way round. The free version is news only, no mail. You have to pay for the full version that includes mail. That said, I used to use it all the time on windows - even ran it on wine for a while when I switched to Linux (until I patched kmail to meet my needs) - -- Alan - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8YF+W1mf3M5ZDr2kRAvjGAKDAvTJ8vOjmN9E4owsteuaEs1AaKQCcCbwC MIBKX1xTt9qv7HxLFDUj9Wo= =31GY -END PGP SIGNATURE-
RE: W32/Myparty
Gary, I also run Free Agent, though just for the newsgroups. My MUA of choice is Outlook (no flames please, I'm tired of them) and I have actually never had any problems with it. I do virus scanning on the mail gateway, before it even gets to reaching Outlook and by disabling a majority of attachments (.doc, .vbs, etc.) it isn't too much to worry about. j. -- Jeremy L. Gaddis [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Gary Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 11:20 AM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: W32/Myparty On Fri, 01 Feb 2002 09:18:44 +0100, Chris Mueller wrote: At 00:11 -0500 01.02.2002, Jeremy L. Gaddis wrote: Are you saying that when I decide to read the debian-* lists I'm subscribed to, I should close Outlook, ... For your own advantage you should close Outlook - for ever. And switch to Eudora. Under Win oder Mac. Since Eudora is a separate programm and not so closely connected to the WinOS, viruses can' get active that easily, e.g. vbs-attachments. ... May I suggest Forte' Agent for mail on a Win box? It is text based, will let you inspect attachments/html in raw form, and will warn and query you should you try to open an executable. I've been using it for 2 years now and if there is a reason not to, I haven't run into it. You can download a free version called Free Agent. I think the news reader is crippled on the free version. I don't know if it runs ads. My mail will have to come through a Win machine for a while yet, so Agent is my protection against hostile email. I tried Eudora, but, for some reason I can't recall, it didn't thrill me. Yes I fear I am living beyond my mental means--Nash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: W32/Myparty
begin Jeremy Gaddis quotation: My MUA of choice is Outlook (no flames please, I'm tired of them) and I have actually never had any problems with it. Except for not being able to read messages like this one? Craig
Re: W32/Myparty
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 07:42:32PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote: | begin Jeremy Gaddis quotation: | | My MUA of choice is Outlook (no flames please, I'm tired | of them) and I have actually never had any problems with | it. | | Except for not being able to read messages like this one? Or the messages some of my coworkers send -- the body is essentially null and the real content is in a .doc attachment. (The best is when antiword showed only [pic]. Fortunately the latest abiword package actually runs which allowed me to read it.) -D -- The lot is cast into the lap, but its every decision is from the Lord. Proverbs 16:33
RE: W32/Myparty
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Jeremy Gaddis wrote: You're a fucking arrogant bastard, you know that? Being a recovering bob does that. -- Baloo
Re: W32/Myparty
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, dman wrote: No he isn't. He's been a helpful member of this list for quite some time. Used to have the email [EMAIL PROTECTED] and my tech IDs were 4263G and 6918B, before and after the Beaverton office moved. You can't claim that he didn't see what he saw. You did notice that he didn't say *you* in particular were proud, just that all the outlook users he's worked with were. Thinking back, I remember one Outlook user who was clueful, and he was giving us a heads-up about a server that had *just* crashed (one of the ancient NT machines in Illinois someone missed in the migration to Solaris, if I remember correctly). -- Baloo
Re: W32/Myparty
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 10:46:47AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Personally, I'd love to be able to SSH out to my home box, but the company I'm in have an MS Proxy server blocking the way and it won't let anything out without authenticating using an NT account. :( The funny thing is that it is probably easier to break the system than acually use it for anything productive. - Adam
Re: W32/Myparty
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 10:46:47AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Personally, I'd love to be able to SSH out to my home box, but the company I'm in have an MS Proxy server blocking the way and it won't let anything out without authenticating using an NT account. :( Have a look at httptunnel - it may let you run TCP/IP over HTTP. SSH over TCP/IP over HTTP (with at least one proxy involved) over TCP/IP isn't going to be fast, but it may well be workable ... -- Karl E. Jørgensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.karl.jorgensen.com Today's fortune: Microsoft is not the answer. Microsoft is the question. NO (or Linux) is the answer. (Taken from a .signature from someone from the UK, source unknown) pgplDNiCn050M.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: W32/Myparty
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote: SSH over TCP/IP over HTTP (with at least one proxy involved) over TCP/IP isn't going to be fast, but it may well be workable ... I used to do this when some moron MCSE blocked close to all the ports, severely limiting my ability to get my job done without the magic tunnel. -- Baloo
Re: W32/Myparty
At 14:09 -0800 31.01.2002, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote: This makes no sense to me. If you're on a Linux mailing list, just why are you using software by the antichrist? Well - I never considered Apple as antichrist ;-) I am mailing on a Mac. It's easier, less time consuming - and safer: - no mail on a working machine - no virus on any other machine than this Mac - most of the viruses can't disturb MacOS - very successful screening for viruses - no cost mailserver working reliably and easy to administrate - superbe EMail client Eudora and and and This makes sense to me :-) Chris
RE: W32/Myparty
At 00:11 -0500 01.02.2002, Jeremy L. Gaddis wrote:
Are you saying that when I decide to read the debian-* lists
I'm subscribed to, I should close Outlook, SSH to the mail
server and read them using {elm|mutt|pine|other_mda}? Like
anything else, it comes down to what you like best and what
does the job well. I run Linux on my servers because it does
the job better. On the same note, I run Windows on my desktop
machines because, at this time, Linux, IMO, sucks ass as far
as desktops go.
For your own advantage
you should close Outlook - for ever.
And switch to Eudora.
Under Win oder Mac.
Since Eudora is a separate programm
and not so closely connected to the WinOS,
viruses can' get active that easily,
e.g. vbs-attachments.
I never understood
why people use such a complicated email client
when there is a much more handy alternative like Eudora.
Example:
You want to send a mail to a person you mailed before.
In Eudora
you klick send again
and change the relevant message text.
Everything else remains:
- to, from
- beginning and end of body
- sig
In Outlook you do not have a command like that.
The people who programmed Outlook
should be condammed to use it for livetime.
;-)
Chris
Re: W32/Myparty
* Chris Mueller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Feb 01. 2002 03:20]: [...] For your own advantage you should close Outlook - for ever. And switch to Eudora. Under Win oder Mac. Or TheBat! (cheaper and more of a power users' Winblows MUA.) -- Brian Clark | Debian GNU/Linux: 3950 packages to keep you busy. Fingerprint: 07CE FA37 8DF6 A109 8119 076B B5A2 E5FB E4D0 C7C8 I am Death, not Taxes. *I* turn up only once.
RE: W32/Myparty
I used to use Eudora as my main MUA, but I find that Outlook
meets my needs better. Outlook isn't *just* an MUA, it also
has a calendar, a task scheduler, a journal, etc. (all of which
I use, actually). Since I'm going to use Outlook for these functions
anyways, I figure I might as well use it for e-mail.
Viruses aren't a problem as I like to think I have a bit more
common sense than the average Outlook user. You might notice the
X-Scanner: header in my e-mail messages. All incoming and outgoing
mails are scanned for virii on the mail server and I also run a virus
scanner on my desktop (McAfee/NAI on the server, Trend Micro on my
desktops).
BTW, each message I send out is copied to a folder on my IMAP store,
so resending a message is not a problem for me (if I need to do so,
which isn't often).
Anyways, I think we can call an end to this MUA war (which seems to
start back up every couple of weeks or so). You use what you like,
I'll do the same, and we'll be happy campers.
j.
--
Jeremy L. Gaddis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Chris Mueller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 3:19 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: Jeremy L. Gaddis
Subject: RE: W32/Myparty
At 00:11 -0500 01.02.2002, Jeremy L. Gaddis wrote:
Are you saying that when I decide to read the debian-* lists
I'm subscribed to, I should close Outlook, SSH to the mail
server and read them using {elm|mutt|pine|other_mda}? Like
anything else, it comes down to what you like best and what
does the job well. I run Linux on my servers because it does
the job better. On the same note, I run Windows on my desktop
machines because, at this time, Linux, IMO, sucks ass as far
as desktops go.
For your own advantage
you should close Outlook - for ever.
And switch to Eudora.
Under Win oder Mac.
Since Eudora is a separate programm
and not so closely connected to the WinOS,
viruses can' get active that easily,
e.g. vbs-attachments.
I never understood
why people use such a complicated email client
when there is a much more handy alternative like Eudora.
Example:
You want to send a mail to a person you mailed before.
In Eudora
you klick send again
and change the relevant message text.
Everything else remains:
- to, from
- beginning and end of body
- sig
In Outlook you do not have a command like that.
The people who programmed Outlook
should be condammed to use it for livetime.
;-)
Chris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: W32/Myparty
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 17:50:35 -0500 dman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 02:26:52PM -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote: | On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, John Griffiths wrote: [snip] | http://ursine.dyndns.org/~baloo/software/putty.exe | | Before this bob took a better job as a security guard, I used to just | telnet or SSH back to a sane environment. Unfortunately, some very clueful (NOT!) companies block outbound ssh packets, but leave open telnet packets. Portforwarding mitigates that, though... Personally, I'd love to be able to SSH out to my home box, but the company I'm in have an MS Proxy server blocking the way and it won't let anything out without authenticating using an NT account. :( -- Stuart COMPUTACENTER (UK) LTD The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information which may be confidential and which may also be privileged. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it. Computacenter information is available from http://www.computacenter.com This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. ***
Re: W32/Myparty
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, csj wrote: Maybe Passport will solve it for him. And we all know how secure that is... -- Baloo
RE: W32/Myparty
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Jeremy L. Gaddis wrote:
Are you saying that when I decide to read the debian-* lists
I'm subscribed to, I should close Outlook, SSH to the mail
server and read them using {elm|mutt|pine|other_mda}?
Preferrably for all your email.
the job better. On the same note, I run Windows on my desktop
machines because, at this time, Linux, IMO, sucks ass as far
as desktops go.
I'm not going to even touch the dozens of ways this little piece of FUD
has been proven wrong.
--
Baloo
RE: W32/Myparty
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Chris Mueller wrote: For your own advantage you should close Outlook - for ever. And switch to Eudora. Under Win oder Mac. Non-optimal. Adware doesn't even qualify as non-free in my book. -- Baloo
Re: W32/Myparty
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 05:16:09AM -0500, Jeremy Gaddis wrote: | I used to use Eudora as my main MUA, but I find that Outlook | meets my needs better. Outlook isn't *just* an MUA, it also | has a calendar, a task scheduler, a journal, etc. (all of which | I use, actually). Since I'm going to use Outlook for these functions | anyways, I figure I might as well use it for e-mail. Do one thing and do it well need I say more? | Viruses aren't a problem as I like to think I have a bit more | common sense than the average Outlook user. You might notice the | X-Scanner: header in my e-mail messages. All incoming and outgoing | mails are scanned for virii on the mail server and I also run a virus | scanner on my desktop (McAfee/NAI on the server, Trend Micro on my | desktops). Just think ... if windows virii/worms weren't so easy to create and so easy to propagate, what would all those anti-virus and mass-media companies do for a living? Getting a virus scanner is like putting a band-aid on a compound fracture. It isn't the solution! | Anyways, I think we can call an end to this MUA war (which seems to | start back up every couple of weeks or so). You use what you like, | I'll do the same, and we'll be happy campers. As long as receiving lots of nice little virii and having the potential for your scanners missing the latest one that LookOut conveniently executes automatically makes you a happy camper, go for it. mutt works great on windows too! -D -- If Microsoft would build a car... ... Occasionally your car would die on the freeway for no reason. You would have to pull over to the side of the road, close all of the car windows, shut it off, restart it, and reopen the windows before you could continue. For some reason you would simply accept this.
Re: W32/Myparty
begin Jeremy Gaddis quotation: Viruses aren't a problem as I like to think I have a bit more common sense than the average Outlook user. I expect at least 90% of Outlook users think the same of themselves. You might notice the X-Scanner: header in my e-mail messages. All incoming and outgoing mails are scanned for virii on the mail server and I also run a virus scanner on my desktop (McAfee/NAI on the server, Trend Micro on my desktops). Not good enough. Virus scanners only notice viruses they know about; they don't catch the new one that just got launched a few hours ago and is already spreading around the world like wildfire thanks to the popularity of insecure Microsoft products. If you use the Preview pane in Outlook or Outlook Express, then there's no way for you to even delete the message from your inbox without activating the virus, because any click on the message will cause it to be rendered in the Preview pane, and any rendering of the message will cause the embedded script to activate. To be relatively safe with Outlook, you have to ensure that all active scripting is completely disabled for email messages. I'm not sure about Outlook, but Outlook Express has an option to assign itself to Internet Explorer's restricted zone, which you can then configure in IE to disable all scripting, all ActiveX, etc. Craig pgpFuGFVdLMat.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: W32/Myparty
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Craig Dickson wrote: Viruses aren't a problem as I like to think I have a bit more common sense than the average Outlook user. I expect at least 90% of Outlook users think the same of themselves. Having to do tech support on that godforsaken product has taught me that *all* Outlook users think they're smarter than the average user. Of course, half of them asked me how to right-click, but that didn't stop them from insisting they weren't a moron. -- Baloo
RE: W32/Myparty
You're a fucking arrogant bastard, you know that? j. -- Jeremy L. Gaddis [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Paul 'Baloo' Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 6:38 PM To: Craig Dickson Cc: debian-user list Subject: Re: W32/Myparty On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Craig Dickson wrote: Viruses aren't a problem as I like to think I have a bit more common sense than the average Outlook user. I expect at least 90% of Outlook users think the same of themselves. Having to do tech support on that godforsaken product has taught me that *all* Outlook users think they're smarter than the average user. Of course, half of them asked me how to right-click, but that didn't stop them from insisting they weren't a moron. -- Baloo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: W32/Myparty
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 09:00:49PM -0500, Jeremy Gaddis wrote: | On February 01, 2002 at 6:38 PM Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote : | You're a fucking arrogant bastard, you know that? No he isn't. He's been a helpful member of this list for quite some time. You can't claim that he didn't see what he saw. You did notice that he didn't say *you* in particular were proud, just that all the outlook users he's worked with were. -D -- One man gives freely, yet gains even more; another withholds unduly, but comes to poverty. Proverbs 11:24
W32/Myparty
Hi, 7 mails with virus W32/Myparty got into my inbox - all of them from linux-mailinglists. :-( Chris -- Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Received: from HOST (minh.jaist.ac.jp [150.65.234.72]) by mailrelay.jaist.ac.jp (3.7W-mailrelay) ...; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 00:23:20 +0900 (JST) -- X-Mailing-List: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org archive/latest Received: from sproll604.wh-sproll.uni-ulm.de (HELO HOST) (134.60.105.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp010-rz3) with SMTP; 28 Jan 2002 16:57:37 - Received: from HOST (youngjae.Stanford.EDU [128.12.179.45]) by smtp2.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) ...; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:29:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from HOST (youngjae.Stanford.EDU [128.12.179.45]) by smtp2.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) ...; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:28:50 -0800 (PST) -- X-Mailing-List: debian-user@lists.debian.org archive/latest Received: from sproll604.wh-sproll.uni-ulm.de (HELO HOST) (134.60.105.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp020-rz3) with SMTP; 28 Jan 2002 16:58:11 Received: from HOST (youngjae.Stanford.EDU [128.12.179.45]) by smtp2.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) ...; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:23:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from HOST (youngjae.Stanford.EDU [128.12.179.45]) by smtp2.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) ...; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:22:52 -0800 (PST) -- Hello! My party... It was absolutely amazing! I have attached my web page with new photos! If you can please make color prints of my photos. Thanks! Attachment converted: www.myparty.yahoo.com --
Re: W32/Myparty
Chris Mueller wrote: Hi, 7 mails with virus W32/Myparty got into my inbox - all of them from linux-mailinglists. How many harmed your debian system ? 0 ? Ahh, the wonders of not being a slave to bill... :-( Chris -- Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Received: from HOST (minh.jaist.ac.jp [150.65.234.72]) by mailrelay.jaist.ac.jp (3.7W-mailrelay) ...; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 00:23:20 +0900 (JST) -- X-Mailing-List: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org archive/latest Received: from sproll604.wh-sproll.uni-ulm.de (HELO HOST) (134.60.105.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp010-rz3) with SMTP; 28 Jan 2002 16:57:37 - Received: from HOST (youngjae.Stanford.EDU [128.12.179.45]) by smtp2.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) ...; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:29:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from HOST (youngjae.Stanford.EDU [128.12.179.45]) by smtp2.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) ...; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:28:50 -0800 (PST) -- X-Mailing-List: debian-user@lists.debian.org archive/latest Received: from sproll604.wh-sproll.uni-ulm.de (HELO HOST) (134.60.105.79) by mail.gmx.net (mp020-rz3) with SMTP; 28 Jan 2002 16:58:11 Received: from HOST (youngjae.Stanford.EDU [128.12.179.45]) by smtp2.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) ...; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:23:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from HOST (youngjae.Stanford.EDU [128.12.179.45]) by smtp2.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) ...; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:22:52 -0800 (PST) -- Hello! My party... It was absolutely amazing! I have attached my web page with new photos! If you can please make color prints of my photos. Thanks! Attachment converted: www.myparty.yahoo.com --
Re: W32/Myparty
At 16:01 31/01/2002 +0100, you wrote: Chris Mueller wrote: Hi, 7 mails with virus W32/Myparty got into my inbox - all of them from linux-mailinglists. How many harmed your debian system ? 0 ? Ahh, the wonders of not being a slave to bill... How many of us are reading this email on a Windows box...? Geoff Beaumont [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: W32/Myparty
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Chris Mueller wrote: Hi, 7 mails with virus W32/Myparty got into my inbox - all of them from linux-mailinglists. This makes no sense to me. If you're on a Linux mailing list, just why are you using software by the antichrist? -- Baloo
Re: W32/Myparty
At 02:09 PM 1/31/02 -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote: On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Chris Mueller wrote: Hi, 7 mails with virus W32/Myparty got into my inbox - all of them from linux-mailinglists. This makes no sense to me. If you're on a Linux mailing list, just why are you using software by the antichrist? You might have heard of a little thing called work
Re: W32/Myparty
On Thursday 31 January 2002 18:09 pm, John Griffiths wrote: At 02:09 PM 1/31/02 -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote: On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Chris Mueller wrote: Hi, 7 mails with virus W32/Myparty got into my inbox - all of them from linux-mailinglists. This makes no sense to me. If you're on a Linux mailing list, just why are you using software by the antichrist? You might have heard of a little thing called work Probibly for the same reason I do both. It's called work and what they run there and what I choose to run at home aren't necessarily the same.
Re: W32/Myparty
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, John Griffiths wrote: This makes no sense to me. If you're on a Linux mailing list, just why are you using software by the antichrist? You might have heard of a little thing called work http://ursine.dyndns.org/~baloo/software/putty.exe Before this bob took a better job as a security guard, I used to just telnet or SSH back to a sane environment. -- Baloo
Re: W32/Myparty
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 02:26:52PM -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote: | On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, John Griffiths wrote: | | This makes no sense to me. If you're on a Linux mailing list, just why | are you using software by the antichrist? | | | You might have heard of a little thing called work | | http://ursine.dyndns.org/~baloo/software/putty.exe | | Before this bob took a better job as a security guard, I used to just | telnet or SSH back to a sane environment. I do this all the time! Regardless, if you're using windows to read mail -- always beware!! Even if you're not, just add a rule to your filtering mechanism to file all that junk in the bit-bucket. -D -- You have heard the saying that if you put a thousand monkeys in a room with a thousand typewriters and waited long enough, eventually you would have a room full of dead monkeys. (Scott Adams - The Dilbert principle)
Re: W32/Myparty
On Thursday 31 January 2002 08:00 am, Geoff Beaumont wrote: At 16:01 31/01/2002 +0100, you wrote: Chris Mueller wrote: Hi, 7 mails with virus W32/Myparty got into my inbox - all of them from linux-mailinglists. How many harmed your debian system ? 0 ? Ahh, the wonders of not being a slave to bill... How many of us are reading this email on a Windows box...? Geoff Beaumont [EMAIL PROTECTED] while bill does grate, ain't it nice of him to keep the amateur script-kiddies busy on that side of the fence.
Re: W32/Myparty
On Thursday 31 January 2002 18:02, benfoley wrote: On Thursday 31 January 2002 08:00 am, Geoff Beaumont wrote: At 16:01 31/01/2002 +0100, you wrote: Chris Mueller wrote: Hi, 7 mails with virus W32/Myparty got into my inbox - all of them from linux-mailinglists. How many harmed your debian system ? 0 ? Ahh, the wonders of not being a slave to bill... How many of us are reading this email on a Windows box...? Geoff Beaumont [EMAIL PROTECTED] while bill does grate, ain't it nice of him to keep the amateur script-kiddies busy on that side of the fence. Yes, but we might have to be more careful now, billy is going to concentrate on security from now on... John
Re: W32/Myparty
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, John Cichy wrote: Yes, but we might have to be more careful now, billy is going to concentrate on security from now on... Do you honestly believe it's more than the same bullshit lipservice as before? -- Baloo
Re: W32/Myparty
On Thursday 31 January 2002 18:15, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote: On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, John Cichy wrote: Yes, but we might have to be more careful now, billy is going to concentrate on security from now on... Do you honestly believe it's more than the same bullshit lipservice as before? No, but it's a nice thought though ;-0 John
Re: W32/Myparty
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 17:50:35 -0500 dman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 02:26:52PM -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote: | On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, John Griffiths wrote: [snip] | http://ursine.dyndns.org/~baloo/software/putty.exe | | Before this bob took a better job as a security guard, I used to just | telnet or SSH back to a sane environment. Unfortunately, some very clueful (NOT!) companies block outbound ssh packets, but leave open telnet packets. Portforwarding mitigates that, though... -- ++ | Ron Johnson, Jr.Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | Jefferson, LA USA http://ronandheather.dhs.org:81| || ! Great Inventors of our time: | !Al Gore - Internet | !Sun Microsystems - Clusters| ++
Re: W32/Myparty
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 05:46:12PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: | On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 17:50:35 -0500 dman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 02:26:52PM -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote: | | On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, John Griffiths wrote: | [snip] | | http://ursine.dyndns.org/~baloo/software/putty.exe | | | | Before this bob took a better job as a security guard, I used to just | | telnet or SSH back to a sane environment. | | Unfortunately, some very clueful (NOT!) companies block outbound | ssh packets, but leave open telnet packets. Argh. Someone always has to make things difficult, don't they? | Portforwarding mitigates that, though... Heh, yeah, forward 23 on your box to 22 and tell the ssh client to use the telnet port. I like that! -D -- A perverse man stirs up dissension, and a gossip separates close friends. Proverbs 16:28
Re: W32/Myparty
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:15:34 -0800 (PST) Paul 'Baloo' Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, John Cichy wrote: Yes, but we might have to be more careful now, billy is going to concentrate on security from now on... Do you honestly believe it's more than the same bullshit lipservice as before? Security and ease of use don't go hand in hand. Of course, that doesn't mean that just because your OS is difficult it's necessarily secure... One of Bill's biggest problems is probably convincing the average computer user to use passwords. Maybe Passport will solve it for him. -- Humanity's future is in the stars: support a manned mission to Mars! http://www.thinkmars.net/petition/addpetition.html
Re: W32/Myparty
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 10:34:25AM +0800, csj wrote: | On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:15:34 -0800 (PST) | Paul 'Baloo' Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, John Cichy wrote: | | Yes, but we might have to be more careful now, billy is going to | concentrate on security from now on... | | Do you honestly believe it's more than the same bullshit lipservice as | before? | | Security and ease of use don't go hand in hand. Of course, that doesn't | mean that just because your OS is difficult it's necessarily secure... | One of Bill's biggest problems is probably convincing the average | computer user to use passwords. Maybe Passport will solve it for him. I heard that Passport had been cracked already. Maybe google will tell you where I heard it (actually, I think the URL came up on deb-user a while back). -D -- I tell you the truth, everyone who sins is a slave to sin. Now a slave has no permanent place in the family, but a son belongs to it forever. So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed. John 8:34-36
Re: W32/Myparty
all: see http://www.infoworld.com/articles/op/xml/01/09/10/010910oplivingston.xml On Thursday 31 January 2002 18:30, dman wrote: On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 10:34:25AM +0800, csj wrote: | On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:15:34 -0800 (PST) | | Paul 'Baloo' Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, John Cichy wrote: | Yes, but we might have to be more careful now, billy is going to | concentrate on security from now on... | | Do you honestly believe it's more than the same bullshit lipservice as | before? | | Security and ease of use don't go hand in hand. Of course, that doesn't | mean that just because your OS is difficult it's necessarily secure... | One of Bill's biggest problems is probably convincing the average | computer user to use passwords. Maybe Passport will solve it for him. I heard that Passport had been cracked already. Maybe google will tell you where I heard it (actually, I think the URL came up on deb-user a while back). -D -- regards, allen wayne best contractor, diagnostics and support tools telnet 447-4070 your friendly neighborhood rambler owner my rambler will go from 0 to 105 Current date: 36:35:18::30:2002 Ramblers -- Don't you wish everyone had one?
Re: W32/Myparty
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 21:20:43 -0500 dman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 05:46:12PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: | On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 17:50:35 -0500 dman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 02:26:52PM -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote: | | On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, John Griffiths wrote: | [snip] | | http://ursine.dyndns.org/~baloo/software/putty.exe | | | | Before this bob took a better job as a security guard, I used to just | | telnet or SSH back to a sane environment. | | Unfortunately, some very clueful (NOT!) companies block outbound | ssh packets, but leave open telnet packets. Argh. Someone always has to make things difficult, don't they? The irony of a multi-national aerospace defense firm leaving open telnet, but blocking ssh was never lost on me. | Portforwarding mitigates that, though... Heh, yeah, forward 23 on your box to 22 and tell the ssh client to use the telnet port. I like that! That's exactly what I did. Worked like a champ... -- ++ | Ron Johnson, Jr.Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | Jefferson, LA USA http://ronandheather.dhs.org:81| || ! Great Inventors of our time: | !Al Gore - Internet | !Sun Microsystems - Clusters| ++
RE: W32/Myparty
Because a person's e-mail address and password are used to sign on to the Passport server -- where account numbers are held -- an unscrupulous person at an ISP could easily steal credit card numbers, experts say. I'm sure the experts were hard at work researching this for months before they figured that out. This isn't limited to Microsoft's Passport. This would apply to anything that doesn't use some form of encryption. On a side note, any unscrupulous person at my ISP could easily get my credit card numbers from their own files. j. -- Jeremy L. Gaddis [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: allen wayne best just ramblin in his amx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:37 PM To: Debian User Mailing List Subject: Re: W32/Myparty all: see http://www.infoworld.com/articles/op/xml/01/09/10/010910oplivingston.xml On Thursday 31 January 2002 18:30, dman wrote: On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 10:34:25AM +0800, csj wrote: | On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:15:34 -0800 (PST) | | Paul 'Baloo' Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, John Cichy wrote: | Yes, but we might have to be more careful now, billy is going to | concentrate on security from now on... | | Do you honestly believe it's more than the same bullshit lipservice as | before? | | Security and ease of use don't go hand in hand. Of course, that doesn't | mean that just because your OS is difficult it's necessarily secure... | One of Bill's biggest problems is probably convincing the average | computer user to use passwords. Maybe Passport will solve it for him. I heard that Passport had been cracked already. Maybe google will tell you where I heard it (actually, I think the URL came up on deb-user a while back). -D -- regards, allen wayne best contractor, diagnostics and support tools telnet 447-4070 your friendly neighborhood rambler owner my rambler will go from 0 to 105 Current date: 36:35:18::30:2002 Ramblers -- Don't you wish everyone had one? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: W32/Myparty
Are you saying that when I decide to read the debian-* lists
I'm subscribed to, I should close Outlook, SSH to the mail
server and read them using {elm|mutt|pine|other_mda}? Like
anything else, it comes down to what you like best and what
does the job well. I run Linux on my servers because it does
the job better. On the same note, I run Windows on my desktop
machines because, at this time, Linux, IMO, sucks ass as far
as desktops go.
j.
--
Jeremy L. Gaddis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Paul 'Baloo' Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 5:09 PM
To: Chris Mueller
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: W32/Myparty
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Chris Mueller wrote:
Hi,
7 mails with virus W32/Myparty got into my inbox -
all of them from linux-mailinglists.
This makes no sense to me. If you're on a Linux mailing list, just why
are you using software by the antichrist?
--
Baloo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: W32/Myparty
* Jeremy L. Gaddis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Feb 01. 2002 00:13]: [...] On the same note, I run Windows on my desktop machines because, at this time, Linux, IMO, sucks ass as far as desktops go. Let the worms runneth over. On your mark, get set, go! *Pulling the fire alarm* -- Brian Clark | Debian GNU/Linux: 3950 packages to keep you busy. Fingerprint: 07CE FA37 8DF6 A109 8119 076B B5A2 E5FB E4D0 C7C8 Perl: The Swiss Army Chainsaw
Re: W32/Myparty
On Thursday 31 January 2002 09:17 pm, Brian Clark wrote: * Jeremy L. Gaddis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Feb 01. 2002 00:13]: [...] On the same note, I run Windows on my desktop machines because, at this time, Linux, IMO, sucks ass as far as desktops go. Let the worms runneth over. On your mark, get set, go! *Pulling the fire alarm* SPLASH!!!
[Fwd: Sophos Anti-Virus IDE alert: W32/MyParty-A]
---BeginMessage--- Name: W32/MyParty-A Aliases: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Type: Win32 worm Date: 28 January 2002 A virus identity file (IDE) which provides protection is available now from our website and will be incorporated into the March 2002 (3.55) release of Sophos Anti-Virus. Sophos has received several reports of this virus from the wild. Description: W32/MyParty-A is a Windows 32 email-aware worm which arrives as an email with the following characteristics: Subject: new photos from my party! Message text: Hello! My party... It was absolutely amazing! I have attached my web page with new photos! If you can please make color prints of my photos. Thanks! Attached filename: www.myparty.yahoo.com Some people may be fooled into believing the attached file is a link to a website. If the attached file is executed the worm sends a copy of itself to everybody in the Windows Address book (except the current user) using a built in SMTP engine. It gets the SMTP server information from the registry key: HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Internet Account Manager\Accounts\0001 The worm also sends an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to track its spread. Download the IDE file from http://www.sophos.com/downloads/ide/mypartya.ide Read the analysis at http://www.sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32mypartya.html Download a ZIP file containing all the IDE files available for the current version of Sophos Anti-Virus from http://www.sophos.com/downloads/ide/ides.zip Read about how to use IDE files at http://www.sophos.com/downloads/ide/using.html To unsubscribe from this service please visit http://www.sophos.com/virusinfo/notifications ---End Message---
Re: [Fwd: Sophos Anti-Virus IDE alert: W32/MyParty-A]
blablabla... de l'antis-virus Bref je crois que cette fois tout le monde à compris que c'était un virus et de toute façons comme la plupart des personne ici utilise des vrai MUA, nous ne somme pas impacté par les virus et donc des alertes de ce type crée du bruit pour rien (j'y contribut un peut mais bon...). ReBref serrait-il possible d'éviter les message de ce type sur cette ML ? -- WishmastR Madvax : gaffe à force de charier Tom on pourrait se pencher sur ton désert affectif (à moins que tu nous caches des choses:)) sam et *paf* * Madvax ramasse ses dents Nicolas Ledez - Virtual Net (www.virtual-net.fr) pgpJrgCoP93oS.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Fwd: Sophos Anti-Virus IDE alert: W32/MyParty-A]
Le Mon 28/01/2002, Nicolas Ledez disait blablabla... de l'antis-virus Bref je crois que cette fois tout le monde à compris que c'était un virus et de toute façons comme la plupart des personne ici utilise des vrai MUA, nous ne somme pas impacté par les virus et donc des alertes de ce type crée du bruit pour rien (j'y contribut un peut mais bon...). ReBref serrait-il possible d'éviter les message de ce type sur cette ML ? Déjà les erreurs ne devraient *jaias être retpurnées sur la liste, mais à l'admin dont l'adresse est dans l'enveloppe. C'est un énorme bug de certains MTA de renvoyer l'erreur au from d'en-tête au lieu d'utiliser l'envelope. -- Erwan
Re: [Fwd: Sophos Anti-Virus IDE alert: W32/MyParty-A]
Le Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 01:24:24PM +0100, Erwan David a écrit : Déjà les erreurs ne devraient *jaias être retpurnées sur la liste, mais à l'admin dont l'adresse est dans l'enveloppe. C'est un énorme bug de certains MTA de renvoyer l'erreur au from d'en-tête au lieu d'utiliser l'envelope. Boarf... déjà le MTA dont on parle à lui tout seul est un énorme Bug... -- J.F. rencontrerait autre J.F. pour sortir aec siamois sympathiques. Gaétan RYCKEBOER Ingénieur Systèmes et Réseaux Société Virtual-Net [Tous textes et propos tenus dans cet email sont sous license DMDZZ.] pgp9N8bUGkHD9.pgp Description: PGP signature
Antigen found W32/MyParty-A (Sophos) virus
Antigen for Exchange found Unknown-www.myparty.yahoo.com infected with W32/MyParty-A (Sophos) virus. The file is currently Removed. The message, new photos from my party!, was sent from Unknown and was discovered in IMC Queues\Inbound located at INDRA/VELAZQUEZ/MADIMCSV02.
