Re: What's the Debian way of disabling suspend to disk?

2010-09-05 Thread Camaleón
On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 23:07:18 +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:

 Am Freitag, 3. September 2010 schrieb Camaleón:
 
   No, I _can't_. That's the whole reason for my asking here. There
   is no option to hide the button. I've attached a tiny screenie
   where you can see the problematic combo box and the hibernation
   (Tiefschlaf) button right underneath.
  
  I'm still not clear why you cannot just remove it.
  
  Lisi
  
  Because there is no option for it.
 
 Oh, come on, it's just a widget :-)
 
 Right-click → remove this battery monitor
 
 *cough* I don't want to get rid of the applet, I do need it from time to
 time to switch profiles (which brought me to the problem at hand) and to
 quickly see the current battery charge.

So, in brief: you don't like Powerdevil's layout/UI but still want it to 
switch between power management profiles.

I see the following options:

- You can use another applet/plasmoid -instead Powerdevil- to get the job 
done (whether available).

- You can remove the package responsible for hibernation (swsusp/uswsusp) 
to avoid the computer going into S4 state. I find this approach a little 
radical, meaning I wouldn't take that path,  but that is up to you. 
Powerdevil just shows you the available features your kernel is detecting 
and if the kernel can suspend to ram and suspend to disk, Powerdevil 
just displays both.

- You can just take care when clicking Powerdevil applet to avoid 
pressing the wrong button. I find this the most suitable solution :-)

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2010.09.05.14.11...@gmail.com



Re: What's the Debian way of disabling suspend to disk?

2010-09-04 Thread Lisi
On Friday 03 September 2010 18:47:20 Camaleón wrote:
 On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:22:52 +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
  Am Freitag, 3. September 2010 schrieb Lisi:
   No, I _can't_. That's the whole reason for my asking here. There is
   no option to hide the button. I've attached a tiny screenie where you
   can see the problematic combo box and the hibernation (Tiefschlaf)
   button right underneath.
 
  I'm still not clear why you cannot just remove it.
 
  Lisi
 
  Because there is no option for it.

 Oh, come on, it's just a widget :-)

 Right-click → remove this battery monitor

My point exactly.

Lisi


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201009040832.05128.lisi.re...@gmail.com



Re: What's the Debian way of disabling suspend to disk?

2010-09-04 Thread Celejar
On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 22:06:33 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org wrote:

 On Fri, 03 Sep 2010, Celejar wrote:
  On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:32:03 -0300
  Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org wrote:
  
  ...
  
   That said, I don't trust hybernation.  Your data is much safer in the
   long run if you restrain yourself to suspend-to-RAM and shutdowns.
  
  Can you elaborate on this?  I have certainly experienced my share of
 
 Yes.  Suspend-to-disk on Linux x86/amd64 depends on fragile operations, and
 worse, it requires that the hibernation core and some of the more fiendishly
 complex kernel subsystems never disagree at all on the details.
 
 That can easily result in silent, hard-to-track data corruption when code
 changes.  When you're very lucky, it hoses the kernel or the filesystem
 metadata in a way which can be easily noticed by some kernel assertion,
 resulting in an OOPS or warnings.  If you're unlucky, it can slowly rot away
 your filesystem or the data inside it.
 
 Restoring from an hibernation image also does nasty things to the ACPI
 firmware.  But at least any problems there are much more likely to cause the
 box to fail to resume entirely, instead of truly evil stuff like silent
 filesystem or application memory space corruption.

Thanks for the explanation.  I use hibernation pretty heavily, and I've
never really noticed such problems, but OTOH, I have had my share of
system crashes and other such failures, which I've always just chalked
up to living on the bleeding edge (Sid, plus git kernels from
upstream), but who knows ...

  or do you mean the much more serious problem of the hibernation image
  becoming corrupted and the system not realizing this?  I though that
 
 It is not the hibernation image getting corrupted.  It is running system
 state getting corrupted due to bad interaction between parts of the kernel,
 or outright kernel bugs.
 
 Suspend-to-RAM is much easier to get right (and *keep* right), and far less
 fragile.

I'd love to use s2ram, but I've never gotten it to work on this
machine, even with a great deal of time and effort.

Celejar
-- 
foffl.sourceforge.net - Feeds OFFLine, an offline RSS/Atom aggregator
mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email
ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100904213355.063d9da7.cele...@gmail.com



Re: What's the Debian way of disabling suspend to disk?

2010-09-03 Thread Lisi
On Thursday 02 September 2010 21:11:33 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
 Am Donnerstag, 2. September 2010 schrieb Camaleón:
  On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:40:56 +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
   Am Donnerstag, 2. September 2010 schrieb Camaleón:
   I meant you can hibernate your computer with any amount of ram
   available, there are still restoring speed gains in some computers.
   Your mileage may vary.
  
   But you also need as much space on the HDD to store the RAM content,
   which I don’t really do.
 
  Neither do I. I do not use hibernation at all.
 
  My point was just stating the fact that it could be useful under some
  environments/setups regardless the amount of installed memory.

 OK, then that would belong into the OT realm for this particular thread.

This is why on systems with lots of RAM there is no gain in speed by
hibernating vs. restarting + session saving.
  
   I have 8 GiB of ram and a cold start takes some minutes :-)
  
   Booting to the login screeen takes ~35–40 seconds here. Plus another
   half minute to load the DE. Usually I am using normal standby (aka
   suspend to RAM). Powerdevil has no function to disable that feature,
   which is why I want to disable it one level down in the hierarchy.
 
  You mean disable at BIOS level? :-?

 Well, on my old Gentoo system - naturally with my own, laptop-optimised
 kernel - I only had Sleep available in Powerdevil, so I figured that the
 kernel has to (not) support it for the button (not) to show up. I just
 never bothered finding out how to get S2D working.

  [...] KDE should not trigger power savings unless you configure for doing
  so. What you can do is hide/remove the icon

 No, I _can't_. That's the whole reason for my asking here. There is no
 option to hide the button. I've attached a tiny screenie where you can see
 the problematic combo box and the hibernation (Tiefschlaf) button right
 underneath.

I'm still not clear why you cannot just remove it.

Lisi


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201009031610.13087.lisi.re...@gmail.com



Re: What's the Debian way of disabling suspend to disk?

2010-09-03 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
Am Freitag, 3. September 2010 schrieb Lisi:

  No, I _can't_. That's the whole reason for my asking here. There is no
  option to hide the button. I've attached a tiny screenie where you can
  see the problematic combo box and the hibernation (Tiefschlaf) button
  right underneath.
 
 I'm still not clear why you cannot just remove it.
 
 Lisi

Because there is no option for it.
-- 
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla'
begin signature_virus
  Hi! I’m a signature virus.
  Please copy me to your signature to help me spread.
end


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: What's the Debian way of disabling suspend to disk?

2010-09-03 Thread Camaleón
On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:22:52 +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:

 Am Freitag, 3. September 2010 schrieb Lisi:
 
  No, I _can't_. That's the whole reason for my asking here. There is
  no option to hide the button. I've attached a tiny screenie where you
  can see the problematic combo box and the hibernation (Tiefschlaf)
  button right underneath.
 
 I'm still not clear why you cannot just remove it.
 
 Lisi
 
 Because there is no option for it.

Oh, come on, it's just a widget :-)

Right-click → remove this battery monitor

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2010.09.03.17.47...@gmail.com



Re: What's the Debian way of disabling suspend to disk?

2010-09-03 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
Am Freitag, 3. September 2010 schrieb Camaleón:

   No, I _can't_. That's the whole reason for my asking here. There is
   no option to hide the button. I've attached a tiny screenie where you
   can see the problematic combo box and the hibernation (Tiefschlaf)
   button right underneath.
  
  I'm still not clear why you cannot just remove it.
  
  Lisi
  
  Because there is no option for it.
 
 Oh, come on, it's just a widget :-)
 
 Right-click → remove this battery monitor

*cough* I don't want to get rid of the applet, I do need it from time to time 
to switch profiles (which brought me to the problem at hand) and to quickly 
see the current battery charge.
-- 
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla'
UNIX is not user-unfriendly.
It just expects the user to be a little more computer-friendly.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: What's the Debian way of disabling suspend to disk?

2010-09-03 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 03 Sep 2010, Celejar wrote:
 On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:32:03 -0300
 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org wrote:
 
 ...
 
  That said, I don't trust hybernation.  Your data is much safer in the
  long run if you restrain yourself to suspend-to-RAM and shutdowns.
 
 Can you elaborate on this?  I have certainly experienced my share of

Yes.  Suspend-to-disk on Linux x86/amd64 depends on fragile operations, and
worse, it requires that the hibernation core and some of the more fiendishly
complex kernel subsystems never disagree at all on the details.

That can easily result in silent, hard-to-track data corruption when code
changes.  When you're very lucky, it hoses the kernel or the filesystem
metadata in a way which can be easily noticed by some kernel assertion,
resulting in an OOPS or warnings.  If you're unlucky, it can slowly rot away
your filesystem or the data inside it.

Restoring from an hibernation image also does nasty things to the ACPI
firmware.  But at least any problems there are much more likely to cause the
box to fail to resume entirely, instead of truly evil stuff like silent
filesystem or application memory space corruption.

 or do you mean the much more serious problem of the hibernation image
 becoming corrupted and the system not realizing this?  I though that

It is not the hibernation image getting corrupted.  It is running system
state getting corrupted due to bad interaction between parts of the kernel,
or outright kernel bugs.

Suspend-to-RAM is much easier to get right (and *keep* right), and far less
fragile.

-- 
  One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie. -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100904010633.gb21...@khazad-dum.debian.net



Re: What's the Debian way of disabling suspend to disk?

2010-09-02 Thread Camaleón
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 03:11:27 +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:

 because I can’t make Powerdevil (KDE’s power management utility) hide
 the Hibernate button (which I hit accidentially from time to time),
 I’d like to disable the suspend to disk feature on my system. It’s not
 practical anyway (it’s a laptop with 3 GB of RAM).

Amount of ram should not be a relevant key value for benefiting of 
hibernation.
 
 So what is the proper way of disabling it? A kernel parameter? Some ACPI
 setting?

Suspension/hibernation state is being triggered by events (pressing 
power button, closing lid or after being idle for an amount of time). 

Besides, they can be called by hand (manually launching the appropiate 
command) or automatically by DE (KDE powerdevil may have set some power 
saving profiles in use).

If you are using profiles, just setup one that disables hibernation at 
all, then apply that profile and you are done.

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2010.09.02.07.39...@gmail.com



Re: What's the Debian way of disabling suspend to disk?

2010-09-02 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Jo, 02 sep 10, 07:39:09, Camaleón wrote:
 
 Amount of ram should not be a relevant key value for benefiting of 
 hibernation.

Unless there's something I'm missing, copying the contents of the RAM to 
HDD and back heavily depends on the total data available in RAM, which 
tends to be higher depending on the total size of the RAM.

This is why on systems with lots of RAM there is no gain in speed by
hibernating vs. restarting + session saving.

Regards,
Andrei
-- 
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: What's the Debian way of disabling suspend to disk?

2010-09-02 Thread Camaleón
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:03:33 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:

 On Jo, 02 sep 10, 07:39:09, Camaleón wrote:
 
 Amount of ram should not be a relevant key value for benefiting of
 hibernation.
 
 Unless there's something I'm missing, copying the contents of the RAM to
 HDD and back heavily depends on the total data available in RAM, which
 tends to be higher depending on the total size of the RAM.

I meant you can hibernate your computer with any amount of ram available, 
there are still restoring speed gains in some computers. Your mileage may 
vary.
 
 This is why on systems with lots of RAM there is no gain in speed by
 hibernating vs. restarting + session saving.

I have 8 GiB of ram and a cold start takes some minutes :-)

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2010.09.02.08.28...@gmail.com



Re: What's the Debian way of disabling suspend to disk?

2010-09-02 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
Am Donnerstag, 2. September 2010 schrieb Camaleón:

 I meant you can hibernate your computer with any amount of ram available,
 there are still restoring speed gains in some computers. Your mileage may
 vary.

But you also need as much space on the HDD to store the RAM content, which I 
don’t really do.

  This is why on systems with lots of RAM there is no gain in speed by
  hibernating vs. restarting + session saving.
 
 I have 8 GiB of ram and a cold start takes some minutes :-)

Booting to the login screeen takes ~35–40 seconds here. Plus another half 
minute to load the DE. Usually I am using normal standby (aka suspend to RAM). 
Powerdevil has no function to disable that feature, which is why I want to 
disable it one level down in the hierarchy. Another reason is that – as 
mentioned – sometimes I activate it by accident because the profile popup is 
right on top of the Hibernate button. Sometimes, that popup disappears right 
before I click it, hence instead of changing power profile, the laptop takes 
two or three minutes to recognise that there is not enough space and come 
back. Yesterday it so happened. Amarok was still playing music, but at some 
point I was unable to change screens anymore (Shift+Alt+Fx). Only a 
SysRq+REISUB helped.
-- 
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla'
begin signature_virus
  Hi! I’m a signature virus.
  Please copy me to your signature to help me spread.
end


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: What's the Debian way of disabling suspend to disk?

2010-09-02 Thread Camaleón
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:40:56 +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:

 Am Donnerstag, 2. September 2010 schrieb Camaleón:
 
 I meant you can hibernate your computer with any amount of ram
 available, there are still restoring speed gains in some computers.
 Your mileage may vary.
 
 But you also need as much space on the HDD to store the RAM content,
 which I don’t really do.

Neither do I. I do not use hibernation at all.

My point was just stating the fact that it could be useful under some 
environments/setups regardless the amount of installed memory.

  This is why on systems with lots of RAM there is no gain in speed by
  hibernating vs. restarting + session saving.
 
 I have 8 GiB of ram and a cold start takes some minutes :-)
 
 Booting to the login screeen takes ~35–40 seconds here. Plus another
 half minute to load the DE. Usually I am using normal standby (aka
 suspend to RAM). Powerdevil has no function to disable that feature,
 which is why I want to disable it one level down in the hierarchy.

You mean disable at BIOS level? :-?

 Another reason is that – as mentioned – sometimes I activate it by
 accident because the profile popup is right on top of the Hibernate
 button. Sometimes, that popup disappears right before I click it, hence
 instead of changing power profile, the laptop takes two or three minutes
 to recognise that there is not enough space and come back. Yesterday it
 so happened. Amarok was still playing music, but at some point I was
 unable to change screens anymore (Shift+Alt+Fx). Only a SysRq+REISUB
 helped.

KDE should not trigger power savings unless you configure for doing so. 
What you can do is hide/remove the icon you are clicking unconsciously 
that enables hibernation in your system.

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2010.09.02.16.55...@gmail.com



Re: What's the Debian way of disabling suspend to disk?

2010-09-02 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010, Andrei Popescu wrote:
 On Jo, 02 sep 10, 07:39:09, Camaleón wrote:
  Amount of ram should not be a relevant key value for benefiting of 
  hibernation.
 
 Unless there's something I'm missing, copying the contents of the RAM to 
 HDD and back heavily depends on the total data available in RAM, which 
 tends to be higher depending on the total size of the RAM.

It also depends on whether you drop file-backed pages or not, etc.

 This is why on systems with lots of RAM there is no gain in speed by
 hibernating vs. restarting + session saving.

The hybernation image is compressed and stored as single file or inside
the swap partition.  Accessing that can be a LOT faster than the
accesses during doing boot (unless SSDs are involved).

That said, I don't trust hybernation.  Your data is much safer in the
long run if you restrain yourself to suspend-to-RAM and shutdowns.

-- 
  One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie. -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100902173203.ga1...@khazad-dum.debian.net



Re: What's the Debian way of disabling suspend to disk?

2010-09-02 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
Am Donnerstag, 2. September 2010 schrieb Camaleón:
 On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:40:56 +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
  Am Donnerstag, 2. September 2010 schrieb Camaleón:
  I meant you can hibernate your computer with any amount of ram
  available, there are still restoring speed gains in some computers.
  Your mileage may vary.
  
  But you also need as much space on the HDD to store the RAM content,
  which I don’t really do.
 
 Neither do I. I do not use hibernation at all.
 
 My point was just stating the fact that it could be useful under some
 environments/setups regardless the amount of installed memory.

OK, then that would belong into the OT realm for this particular thread.

   This is why on systems with lots of RAM there is no gain in speed by
   hibernating vs. restarting + session saving.
  
  I have 8 GiB of ram and a cold start takes some minutes :-)
  
  Booting to the login screeen takes ~35–40 seconds here. Plus another
  half minute to load the DE. Usually I am using normal standby (aka
  suspend to RAM). Powerdevil has no function to disable that feature,
  which is why I want to disable it one level down in the hierarchy.
 
 You mean disable at BIOS level? :-?

Well, on my old Gentoo system - naturally with my own, laptop-optimised kernel 
- I only had Sleep available in Powerdevil, so I figured that the kernel has 
to (not) support it for the button (not) to show up. I just never bothered 
finding out how to get S2D working.

 [...] KDE should not trigger power savings unless you configure for doing
 so. What you can do is hide/remove the icon

No, I _can't_. That's the whole reason for my asking here. There is no option 
to hide the button. I've attached a tiny screenie where you can see the 
problematic combo box and the hibernation (Tiefschlaf) button right 
underneath.
-- 
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla'
Programmers don’t die, they GOSUB without RETURN.
attachment: pd.png

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: What's the Debian way of disabling suspend to disk?

2010-09-02 Thread Camaleón
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 22:11:33 +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:

 Am Donnerstag, 2. September 2010 schrieb Camaleón:

(...)

  Booting to the login screeen takes ~35–40 seconds here. Plus another
  half minute to load the DE. Usually I am using normal standby (aka
  suspend to RAM). Powerdevil has no function to disable that feature,
  which is why I want to disable it one level down in the hierarchy.
 
 You mean disable at BIOS level? :-?
 
 Well, on my old Gentoo system - naturally with my own, laptop-optimised
 kernel - I only had Sleep available in Powerdevil, so I figured that the
 kernel has to (not) support it for the button (not) to show up. I just
 never bothered finding out how to get S2D working.

Different kernel releases may have different acpi support/
implementantions. I mean, maybe the Gentoo kernel you were using at that 
time was not able to detect the full capabilities of your board and just 
enabled suspension and not hibernation. 

Anyway, I'm not sure how to force acpi being selective for detecting 
one suspension method and avoid the other :-? 

 [...] KDE should not trigger power savings unless you configure for
 doing so. What you can do is hide/remove the icon
 
 No, I _can't_. That's the whole reason for my asking here. There is no
 option to hide the button. I've attached a tiny screenie where you can
 see the problematic combo box and the hibernation (Tiefschlaf) button
 right underneath.

How about hidding the whole Powerdevil applet? If you don't need it at all
(it seem you are not usually switching between power management profiles) 
and makes you click something you want to avoid, I see no reason to 
having it there.

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2010.09.02.20.43...@gmail.com



Re: What's the Debian way of disabling suspend to disk?

2010-09-02 Thread Celejar
On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:32:03 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org wrote:

...

 That said, I don't trust hybernation.  Your data is much safer in the
 long run if you restrain yourself to suspend-to-RAM and shutdowns.

Can you elaborate on this?  I have certainly experienced my share of
hibernation / resume failures, but IIUC, the result is the same as if
the system had just crashed - journal recovery is done, etc.  Do you
mean just the sort of data loss that can result from a crashed system,
or do you mean the much more serious problem of the hibernation image
becoming corrupted and the system not realizing this?  I though that
the image integrity is verified by checksums, or some other such
method.  Or do you mean something else entirely?  [Not disagreeing with
you, just trying to understand the potential problems here.]

Celejar
-- 
foffl.sourceforge.net - Feeds OFFLine, an offline RSS/Atom aggregator
mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email
ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100903013949.2949cafd.cele...@gmail.com



What's the Debian way of disabling suspend to disk?

2010-09-01 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
Hello List,

because I can’t make Powerdevil (KDE’s power management utility) hide the 
Hibernate button (which I hit accidentially from time to time), I’d like to 
disable the suspend to disk feature on my system. It’s not practical anyway 
(it’s a laptop with 3 GB of RAM).

So what is the proper way of disabling it?
A kernel parameter? Some ACPI setting?

Thanks.
-- 
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla'
What’s right is right, otherwise it’d be wrong.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.