Re: GNOME 2.x debs?
On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 03:30:19AM -0400, Mike Frisch wrote: | On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 09:56:57PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: | > | I have been running GNOME 2.x on RedHat for a few weeks now and it seems | > | to work pretty well. | > | > Huh. Is that like gcc 2.96 -- grab a cvs snapshot and call it stable? | > Or are they labeled as pre-release? | | It's pre-release That's a nice change :-). | and I didn't mean for this to be a "bash RedHat" thread. Sure. My reaction to "I've been running not-yet-released stuff on RH" came from my experiences with RH 7.0. Those experiences are what drove me to debian (and now I wonder why I didn't start here :-)). -D -- "He is no fool who gives up what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose." --Jim Elliot GnuPG key : http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/public_key.gpg pgpxwrxCoYPku.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: GNOME 2.x debs?
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 09:56:57PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: > | I have been running GNOME 2.x on RedHat for a few weeks now and it seems > | to work pretty well. > > Huh. Is that like gcc 2.96 -- grab a cvs snapshot and call it stable? > Or are they labeled as pre-release? It's pre-release and I didn't mean for this to be a "bash RedHat" thread. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GNOME 2.x debs?
On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 21:56, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: > On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 06:42:53PM -0400, Mike Frisch wrote: > > | I have been running GNOME 2.x on RedHat for a few weeks now and it seems > | to work pretty well. > > Huh. Is that like gcc 2.96 -- grab a cvs snapshot and call it stable? > Or are they labeled as pre-release? That bastard gcc 2.96 is why I'm now using debian after going round and round with various rpm distros. I will consider gnome2 when it gets into testing. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GNOME 2.x debs?
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 06:42:53PM -0400, Mike Frisch wrote: | I have been running GNOME 2.x on RedHat for a few weeks now and it seems | to work pretty well. Huh. Is that like gcc 2.96 -- grab a cvs snapshot and call it stable? Or are they labeled as pre-release? -D -- If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us. I John 1:8 GnuPG key : http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/public_key.gpg pgpnTHxvSWS4m.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: GNOME 2.x debs?
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 05:38:43PM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote: > Well, no, because GNOME 2.x hasn't been released yet, and nobody has > created a working time machine. ;-) Now for GNOME 2.x prereleases and > snapshots... Ok, sorry I wasn't more clear. > Having said that, the packages seem to be working pretty well. Aside > From the fact that I can't get sound to work. Also, note that GNOME 1.x > panel applets won't work any more, and some packages haven't been > packaged yet (e.g. gnome-games2, sawfish-gnome2). I have been running GNOME 2.x on RedHat for a few weeks now and it seems to work pretty well. > If you want to try out the EXPERIMENTAL packages, use this sources line: > > deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian ../project/experimental main Thanks. Mike. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GNOME 2.x debs?
> "Mike" == Mike Frisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mike> Has anybody put together debs of GNOME 2.x? If so, where might I Mike> get them? (I searched the mailing-list archives and am surprised Mike> nobody else has asked) Well, no, because GNOME 2.x hasn't been released yet, and nobody has created a working time machine. ;-) Now for GNOME 2.x prereleases and snapshots... There are EXPERIMENTAL packages available. Experimental is more unstable than unstable, so don't complain if things don't work, or break for unexpected reasons. Having said that, the packages seem to be working pretty well. Aside From the fact that I can't get sound to work. Also, note that GNOME 1.x panel applets won't work any more, and some packages haven't been packaged yet (e.g. gnome-games2, sawfish-gnome2). If you want to try out the EXPERIMENTAL packages, use this sources line: deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian ../project/experimental main -- Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.uhoreg.ca/ PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred. pgpkRvH3XjhzY.pgp Description: PGP signature
GNOME 2.x debs?
Has anybody put together debs of GNOME 2.x? If so, where might I get them? (I searched the mailing-list archives and am surprised nobody else has asked) Mike. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apache v2.x debs ???
http://kebo.vlsm.org/debian-extra/dists/woody/apache2 i'm forget about the real site is in people.debian.org On Thu, 16 May 2002 16:39:47 -0500 "Michael D. Schleif" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Where can I find debs for recent apache, preferably v2.0.36 ??? > > -- > > Best Regards, > > mds > mds resource > 888.250.3987 > > Dare to fix things before they break . . . > > Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we > think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . . > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Belajar Linux... susah, belajar Windows... mahal, terus belajar apa dong... bobo' aja a.. ZZZ ZZZ ZZZ ... v(o.o) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
apache v2.x debs ???
Where can I find debs for recent apache, preferably v2.0.36 ??? -- Best Regards, mds mds resource 888.250.3987 Dare to fix things before they break . . . Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . . -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Making X debs
--Please CC me-- In order to use the newest matrox drivers I need to recompile X. I have done this before successfully but I just copied the new X11R6 directory to /usr/X11R6. While this worked I had to hold the X packages with dpkg. This obviously caused some problems with other packages. So what I would like to do, if it's not too much work, is to compile and make my own debs of the X packages. I haven't made any debs before so if this is going to be way over my head LMK. I have looked around and it seems I'm going to need to use debhelper or doogies-build system. Does anyone have anything that could help me get started or some docs that I should read? Thanks Ben __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
Re: X Debs?
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Jon Hughes wrote: > I'm trying to upgrade my X server from a default Slink installation so it'll > work with my voodoo banshee card here at work. Is there a place where I can > find the 3.3.5 debs? All the Debian page seems to have is the 3.3.2 ones > and to my knowledge that doesn't support Banshee very well. Put the line deb ftp://cadzentrum.m.fh-offenburg.de/pub/os/linux/debian/ ./ into your /etc/apt/source.lists. (These are no official debian packages, it's only the result of some days, when I was bored, downloaded the source an compiled it with out any changes against glibc 2.0 ... it worked for me :-) Martin -- If the box says 'Windows 95 or better', it should run on Linux, right? - anonymous For public PGP-key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X Debs?
I'm trying to upgrade my X server from a default Slink installation so it'll work with my voodoo banshee card here at work. Is there a place where I can find the 3.3.5 debs? All the Debian page seems to have is the 3.3.2 ones and to my knowledge that doesn't support Banshee very well. Thanks Jon "God, Root. What is the difference?" Pitr, User Friendly
