Re: Resp.: Virtualbox x upgrade do Lenny
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tem que ser a OSE? se não for instala o virtualbox2.0 que funciona. O ideal seria você desinstalar tudo que fosse virtualbox que ja tivesse instalado e reinstalar via apt. Porem, faz o seguinte, remove tudo e baixa daqui e instala http://dlc.sun.com/virtualbox/vboxdownload.html Fabio Guerrazzi escreveu: Em 26/10/08, Flamarion Jorge[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 deb http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian/ etch non-free deb http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian/ lenny non-free Entrem no site e peguem e adcionem a chave gpg e ta resolvido o problema sem marcar pacote como hold ou qualquer outra coisa. Abraços. Flamarion Jorge Guilherme Rocha escreveu: Prezado Fábio, acho que vc não fez nada de errado. Uso o Debian SID, e também o virtualbox. Isso aconteceu comigo recentemente. Imagino que algum dos pacotes relacionado ao virtualbox esteja precisando de atualização. Eu resolvi isso simplesmente usando: # aptitude hold virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.26-1-686 Isso marca o pacote para não ser atualizado nas próximas atualizações. Só não esqueça de rodar um unhold em um determinado momento. abraço, 2008/10/25 Fabio [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Instalei com sucesso o Virtualbox usando os passos descritos em [1]. O problema é que o sistema toda hora quer reinstalar o pacote virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.26-1-686 o que faz com que o Virtualbox deixe de funcionar, precisando repetir os passos m-a a-i virtualbox-ose e modprobe vboxdrv reiniciando tudo de novo. O que eu fiz de errado? 1. http://chirale.wordpress.com/2007/12/23/virtualbox-ose-debian-install-howto/ Flamarion fiz o que você sugeriu porém o sistema contunua pedindo para instalar o pacote virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.26-1-686... -- Fabio. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkkG7ywACgkQ0SDRnmynUOEnzACglihpLlaSCKr0BVnC03q/gH7C KakAoMOxo+XmeoJdNOpUmK0pr1av08wX =HsFN -END PGP SIGNATURE- __ Faça ligações para outros computadores com o novo Yahoo! Messenger http://br.beta.messenger.yahoo.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resp.: Virtualbox x upgrade do Lenny
Em 26/10/08, Flamarion Jorge[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 deb http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian/ etch non-free deb http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian/ lenny non-free Entrem no site e peguem e adcionem a chave gpg e ta resolvido o problema sem marcar pacote como hold ou qualquer outra coisa. Abraços. Flamarion Jorge Guilherme Rocha escreveu: Prezado Fábio, acho que vc não fez nada de errado. Uso o Debian SID, e também o virtualbox. Isso aconteceu comigo recentemente. Imagino que algum dos pacotes relacionado ao virtualbox esteja precisando de atualização. Eu resolvi isso simplesmente usando: # aptitude hold virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.26-1-686 Isso marca o pacote para não ser atualizado nas próximas atualizações. Só não esqueça de rodar um unhold em um determinado momento. abraço, 2008/10/25 Fabio [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Instalei com sucesso o Virtualbox usando os passos descritos em [1]. O problema é que o sistema toda hora quer reinstalar o pacote virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.26-1-686 o que faz com que o Virtualbox deixe de funcionar, precisando repetir os passos m-a a-i virtualbox-ose e modprobe vboxdrv reiniciando tudo de novo. O que eu fiz de errado? 1. http://chirale.wordpress.com/2007/12/23/virtualbox-ose-debian-install-howto/ Flamarion fiz o que você sugeriu porém o sistema contunua pedindo para instalar o pacote virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.26-1-686... -- Fabio. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Virtualbox x upgrade do Lenny
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 deb http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian/ etch non-free deb http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian/ lenny non-free Entrem no site e peguem e adcionem a chave gpg e ta resolvido o problema sem marcar pacote como hold ou qualquer outra coisa. Abraços. Flamarion Jorge Guilherme Rocha escreveu: Prezado Fábio, acho que vc não fez nada de errado. Uso o Debian SID, e também o virtualbox. Isso aconteceu comigo recentemente. Imagino que algum dos pacotes relacionado ao virtualbox esteja precisando de atualização. Eu resolvi isso simplesmente usando: # aptitude hold virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.26-1-686 Isso marca o pacote para não ser atualizado nas próximas atualizações. Só não esqueça de rodar um unhold em um determinado momento. abraço, 2008/10/25 Fabio [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Instalei com sucesso o Virtualbox usando os passos descritos em [1]. O problema é que o sistema toda hora quer reinstalar o pacote virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.26-1-686 o que faz com que o Virtualbox deixe de funcionar, precisando repetir os passos m-a a-i virtualbox-ose e modprobe vboxdrv reiniciando tudo de novo. O que eu fiz de errado? 1. http://chirale.wordpress.com/2007/12/23/virtualbox-ose-debian-install-howto/ -- Fabio. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkkERuUACgkQ0SDRnmynUOFOpQCgjWXWYmpRK88gjl3mmcnmTIBO oxsAoMUDr23eVP6DA5V8H4gU6GImjvda =3jxM -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Yahoo! Mail - Sempre a melhor opção para você! Experimente já e veja as novidades. http://br.yahoo.com/mailbeta/tudonovo/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Virtualbox x upgrade do Lenny
Instalei com sucesso o Virtualbox usando os passos descritos em [1]. O problema é que o sistema toda hora quer reinstalar o pacote virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.26-1-686 o que faz com que o Virtualbox deixe de funcionar, precisando repetir os passos m-a a-i virtualbox-ose e modprobe vboxdrv reiniciando tudo de novo. O que eu fiz de errado? 1. http://chirale.wordpress.com/2007/12/23/virtualbox-ose-debian-install-howto/ -- Fabio. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Virtualbox x upgrade do Lenny
Prezado Fábio, acho que vc não fez nada de errado. Uso o Debian SID, e também o virtualbox. Isso aconteceu comigo recentemente. Imagino que algum dos pacotes relacionado ao virtualbox esteja precisando de atualização. Eu resolvi isso simplesmente usando: # aptitude hold virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.26-1-686 Isso marca o pacote para não ser atualizado nas próximas atualizações. Só não esqueça de rodar um unhold em um determinado momento. abraço, 2008/10/25 Fabio [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Instalei com sucesso o Virtualbox usando os passos descritos em [1]. O problema é que o sistema toda hora quer reinstalar o pacote virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.26-1-686 o que faz com que o Virtualbox deixe de funcionar, precisando repetir os passos m-a a-i virtualbox-ose e modprobe vboxdrv reiniciando tudo de novo. O que eu fiz de errado? 1. http://chirale.wordpress.com/2007/12/23/virtualbox-ose-debian-install-howto/ -- Fabio. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Guilherme Rocha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fonts changed after X upgrade in unstable
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 15:46:47 -0700, Nate Eldredge wrote: On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, Florian Kulzer wrote: [...] To try different settings quickly, you can start X like this: startx -- -dpi 84 Aha, that did the trick. And for some reason it didn't affect xterm, etc, either. Maybe those have a fixed font size set somewhere. Now to figure out how to set it permanently. I grepped all of /etc/X11 for dpi; the only match I found was in /etc/X11/xinit/xserverrc which has exec /usr/bin/X11/X -dpi 100 -nolisten tcp But 100 dpi is not the value that's being used, so this can't be it. Moreover this file doesn't seem to have changed since the upgrade. Do you know what's the right place to specify arguments to the X server? I normally start the server manually with startx. I think you can copy /etc/X11/xinit/xserverrc to your home directory and call it .xserverrc, then it will be used when you run startx. Whenever possible I try to avoid making changes in the system files, as this might break things at the next upgrade. (BTW, for security purposes it is really advisable that you keep the -nolisten tcp part.) If that doesn't work you can try one of the other files mentioned in man startx. (I use X with graphical log-in, therefore my knowledge about startx and its configuration files is a bit shaky.) If all else fails you can just put an alias in your .bashrc or .bash_aliases file: alias startx='startx -- -dpi 84 -nolisten tcp' -- Regards, Florian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fonts changed after X upgrade in unstable
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 16:21:11 -0700, Nate Eldredge wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 17:21:10 -0700, Nate Eldredge wrote:
The other day I upgraded my unstable to get the new X.org packages. Most
everything seems okay except that the fonts in many applications are
different. Let's take gaim as an example. The font used throughout
(buddy list, for example) is much smaller than the one I had before, and I
don't like it.
Are you sure that it is really a different font, i.e. a different
typeface, or could it be the same font scaled down in size?
That is possible. I can't tell for sure but it might be the same font.
[...]
Your problem might be due to changes in your X server's resolution
settings, which influence the size of the fonts on the screen. You can
check this from an X terminal with the command
xdpyinfo | grep resolution
[...]
Thanks for the suggestion, I wasn't aware that such a setting existed.
It looks like mine is set to 75x75 dpi. The screen is about a 14 LCD
which is 1024x768 pixels. That does seem too low; by my calculations the
screen should be 1280 pixels diagonally, so it should be more like 90 dpi.
How would I adjust this? I don't see anything that seems to set screen
dpi in either my old or new X server config files, so I don't know what
the old value was or how it got changed.
To try different settings quickly, you can start X like this:
startx -- -dpi 84
Also, would this necessarily affect fonts across the board? Because in
some applications, e.g. xterm, the fonts still look exactly the same as
before.
Then maybe something changed with respect to how GTK applications such
as Gaim set up their user interface. If you change the X resolution all
applications should indeed be affected the same. It seems to me that the
quickest fix might be to look at the file .gtkrc-2.0 in your home
directory and search for a font specification. This is what I have:
style user-font
{
font_name=Bitstream Vera Sans 11
}
widget_class * style user-font
You could try to increase the size specification - 11 (points) in my
case - and restart Gaim.
--
Regards,
Florian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fonts changed after X upgrade in unstable
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Florian Kulzer wrote: On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 17:21:10 -0700, Nate Eldredge wrote: The other day I upgraded my unstable to get the new X.org packages. Most everything seems okay except that the fonts in many applications are different. Let's take gaim as an example. The font used throughout (buddy list, for example) is much smaller than the one I had before, and I don't like it. Are you sure that it is really a different font, i.e. a different typeface, or could it be the same font scaled down in size? That is possible. I can't tell for sure but it might be the same font. Any suggestions on how to investigate further? General tips or references about how fonts in Debian are managed would be helpful as well. I've always had the impression that this is a very complicated system which works in large part by black magic, so any enlightenment would be much appreciated. Your problem might be due to changes in your X server's resolution settings, which influence the size of the fonts on the screen. You can check this from an X terminal with the command xdpyinfo | grep resolution Just post the output here if you can't judge yourself if the setting makes sense. (I have a 15 inch screen and my resolution is set to 86x84 dots per inch.) Thanks for the suggestion, I wasn't aware that such a setting existed. It looks like mine is set to 75x75 dpi. The screen is about a 14 LCD which is 1024x768 pixels. That does seem too low; by my calculations the screen should be 1280 pixels diagonally, so it should be more like 90 dpi. How would I adjust this? I don't see anything that seems to set screen dpi in either my old or new X server config files, so I don't know what the old value was or how it got changed. Also, would this necessarily affect fonts across the board? Because in some applications, e.g. xterm, the fonts still look exactly the same as before. Thanks! -- Nate Eldredge [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fonts changed after X upgrade in unstable
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, Florian Kulzer wrote: On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 16:21:11 -0700, Nate Eldredge wrote: On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Florian Kulzer wrote: Your problem might be due to changes in your X server's resolution settings, which influence the size of the fonts on the screen. You can check this from an X terminal with the command xdpyinfo | grep resolution [...] Thanks for the suggestion, I wasn't aware that such a setting existed. It looks like mine is set to 75x75 dpi. The screen is about a 14 LCD which is 1024x768 pixels. That does seem too low; by my calculations the screen should be 1280 pixels diagonally, so it should be more like 90 dpi. How would I adjust this? I don't see anything that seems to set screen dpi in either my old or new X server config files, so I don't know what the old value was or how it got changed. To try different settings quickly, you can start X like this: startx -- -dpi 84 Aha, that did the trick. And for some reason it didn't affect xterm, etc, either. Maybe those have a fixed font size set somewhere. Now to figure out how to set it permanently. I grepped all of /etc/X11 for dpi; the only match I found was in /etc/X11/xinit/xserverrc which has exec /usr/bin/X11/X -dpi 100 -nolisten tcp But 100 dpi is not the value that's being used, so this can't be it. Moreover this file doesn't seem to have changed since the upgrade. Do you know what's the right place to specify arguments to the X server? I normally start the server manually with startx. Thanks again! -- Nate Eldredge [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fonts changed after X upgrade in unstable
[Note: I would appreciate a personal CC on any replies since this will make it easier for me to find them. But don't bother if not convenient.] Hi folks, The other day I upgraded my unstable to get the new X.org packages. Most everything seems okay except that the fonts in many applications are different. Let's take gaim as an example. The font used throughout (buddy list, for example) is much smaller than the one I had before, and I don't like it. Unfortunately I don't know exactly what font was being used before. I do have backups from a time when the right font was being used, but I don't know what I should look for as far as changes. I did have to re-run dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg to get an xorg.conf file that worked with the new version. However the old and new fonts sections of those files seem to be equivalent. Here they are: Old: Section Files FontPathunix/:7100# local font server # if the local font server has problems, we can fall back on these FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1 FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi EndSection New: Section Files FontPath/usr/share/fonts/X11/misc FontPath/usr/share/fonts/X11/cyrillic FontPath/usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/:unscaled FontPath/usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/:unscaled FontPath/usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1 FontPath/usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi FontPath/usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi # path to defoma fonts FontPath/var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType EndSection There are three differences that I see: 1. I used to have unix:/7100 listed for a font server. But I did not, and do not, have xfs installed, so this seems to have been an ancient remnant. 2. I used to have Speedo listed. I understand the Speedo fonts have gone and are not coming back. But also they had very few users. Somehow I doubt that I would have been one of those few users without knowing it. 3. I now have /var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType listed, at the end. But I tried removing the x-ttcidfont-conf package, which removes the fonts from that directory, and that doesn't change things; the gaim font remains the wrong one. Any suggestions on how to investigate further? General tips or references about how fonts in Debian are managed would be helpful as well. I've always had the impression that this is a very complicated system which works in large part by black magic, so any enlightenment would be much appreciated. Also, if I ever do get back to the status quo, is there any good way to find out what font an application such as gaim is using? Then I could make a note for future reference. If I knew what the good font was, I might have a chance of figuring out why it isn't being used anymore. Many thanks in advance. Here is the output of dpkg -l |grep font in case there is some useful information there. ii console-data 20060317Keymaps, fonts, charset maps, fallback tables for console-too ii console-tools0.2.3dbs-60 Linux console and font utilities rc console-tools-libs 0.2.3dbs-32 Shared libraries for Linux console and font manipulation ii defoma 0.11.8-0.1 Debian Font Manager -- automatic font configuration framework rc dfontmgr 0.11.8-0.1 GUI frontend for Defoma, DEbian FOnt MAnager ii fontconfig 2.3.2-5.1 generic font configuration library - support binaries ii fontconfig-config2.3.2-5.1 generic font configuration library - configuration ii gsfonts 8.14+v8.11+urw-0.2 Fonts for the Ghostscript interpreter(s) ii gsfonts-x11 0.19Make Ghostscript fonts available to X11 ii libconsole 0.2.3dbs-60 Shared libraries for Linux console and font manipulation ii libfont-afm-perl 1.19-1 Font::AFM - Interface to Adobe Font Metrics files ii libfontconfig1 2.3.2-5.1 generic font configuration library - runtime ii libfontenc1 1.0.1-5 X11 font encoding library ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-3FreeType 2 font engine, shared library files ii libt1-5
Re: Fonts changed after X upgrade in unstable
On 4/20/06, Nate Eldredge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Note: I would appreciate a personal CC on any replies since this will make it easier for me to find them. But don't bother if not convenient.] The one time Gmail's behavior is reasonable! The other day I upgraded my unstable to get the new X.org packages. Most everything seems okay except that the fonts in many applications are different. Let's take gaim as an example. The font used throughout (buddy list, for example) is much smaller than the one I had before, and I don't like it. I had the same thing happen to me. After yesterday's upgrade and restarting X, the fonts were all happy again. I'd also reinstalled xfs (which had been removed), so I don't know if that was part of the solution. If you never had xfs installed, then I suspect it's a red herring. -- Michael A. Marsh http://www.umiacs.umd.edu/~mmarsh http://mamarsh.blogspot.com
Re: Fonts changed after X upgrade in unstable
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 17:21:10 -0700, Nate Eldredge wrote: [Note: I would appreciate a personal CC on any replies since this will make it easier for me to find them. But don't bother if not convenient.] Hi folks, The other day I upgraded my unstable to get the new X.org packages. Most everything seems okay except that the fonts in many applications are different. Let's take gaim as an example. The font used throughout (buddy list, for example) is much smaller than the one I had before, and I don't like it. Are you sure that it is really a different font, i.e. a different typeface, or could it be the same font scaled down in size? Unfortunately I don't know exactly what font was being used before. I do have backups from a time when the right font was being used, but I don't know what I should look for as far as changes. I did have to re-run dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg to get an xorg.conf file that worked with the new version. However the old and new fonts sections of those files seem to be equivalent. Here they are: Old: Section Files FontPathunix/:7100# local font server # if the local font server has problems, we can fall back on these FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1 FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi EndSection New: Section Files FontPath/usr/share/fonts/X11/misc FontPath/usr/share/fonts/X11/cyrillic FontPath/usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/:unscaled FontPath/usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/:unscaled FontPath/usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1 FontPath/usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi FontPath/usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi # path to defoma fonts FontPath/var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType EndSection That looks like the normal transition of the font directories for Xorg 7.0. Seems OK to me. [...] Any suggestions on how to investigate further? General tips or references about how fonts in Debian are managed would be helpful as well. I've always had the impression that this is a very complicated system which works in large part by black magic, so any enlightenment would be much appreciated. Your problem might be due to changes in your X server's resolution settings, which influence the size of the fonts on the screen. You can check this from an X terminal with the command xdpyinfo | grep resolution Just post the output here if you can't judge yourself if the setting makes sense. (I have a 15 inch screen and my resolution is set to 86x84 dots per inch.) -- Regards, Florian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
New X upgrade in unstable makes fonts too big
I have a PC with an AMD Athlon64 chip and Debian unstable, i386 port. My monitor is 1024x768. It is 328mm by 246mm (17 in). Today (April 11 2006) X was upgraded in unstable. Now all my fonts are much bigger. Some of the lines returned by xdpinfo are: version number:11.0 X.Org version: 7.0.0 screen #0: dimensions:2032x1530 pixels (321x241 millimeters) resolution:161x161 dots per inch Here is part of my xorg.conf. Note the Virtual. SubSection Display Depth24 Modes1024x768 832x624 720x400 640x480 Virtual 2032 1530 If I comment out the Virtual line and restart X, the fonts are much smaller. It looks like the Virtual line is being used (incorrectly) to set font size. What is the problem and what should I do? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SpamAssassin 3.x, upgrade und debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! Ich habe letztes Jahr noch den SpamAssassin 2.6x auf einer Debian Sarge Installation installiert und war ganz zufrieden damit. Jetzt habe ich vor kurzem auf aktuelle unstable 3.0.2 SpamAssassin geupdated mittels apt-get update und es kommen weit mehr Spam durch als mit dem altem SpamAssassin. Hat jmd. Tips, um die Erkennungsrate zu erhöhen? Grüße Lars - -- - - Technische Universität Braunschweig, Institut für Computergraphik Tel.: +49 531 391-2109E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP-Key-ID: 0xB87A0E03 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCW4ukVguzrLh6DgMRAmFzAKC5vHX7d4mQ5m/VYQoz9YPj/8VLWACgsaE+ /g4dNBC+1pLM4IXdbgmsk/I= =a5Lm -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: SpamAssassin 3.x, upgrade und debian
Am 12.04.2005 um 10:49 schrieb Lars Schimmer: Ich habe letztes Jahr noch den SpamAssassin 2.6x auf einer Debian Sarge Installation installiert und war ganz zufrieden damit. Jetzt habe ich vor kurzem auf aktuelle unstable 3.0.2 SpamAssassin geupdated mittels apt-get update und es kommen weit mehr Spam durch als mit dem altem SpamAssassin. Hm, ich habe genau die umgekehrte Erfahrung gemacht. /usr/share/doc/spamassassin/README.Debian und die Anmerkungen zur Umstellung von DB_File hast Du gelesen? Hat jmd. Tips, um die Erkennungsrate zu erhöhen? Ist Razor installiert? Razor ist IMHO sehr empfehlenswert. Eventuell hilft es auch, die Scores der Razor- und SpamCop-Tests zu erhöhen, wenn Du diesen Diensten vertraust: score RAZOR2_CHECK 2.0 score RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 2.0 Wenn Ihr hauptsächlich Mail in westeuropäischen Sprachen erhaltet, lohnt es sich außerdem folgende Option zu verwenden: ok_locales en ok_locales könnt Ihr auch dann verwenden, wenn Ihr asiatische Mitarbeiter habt. Durch ok_locales steigt zwar die Wahrscheinlichkeit, dass eine Nachricht mit asiatischer Schrift als unerwünschte Werbung erkannt wird, aber um endgültig als Spam erkannt zu werden, muss sie noch weitere Spam-Kriterien erfüllen. Das gleiche gilt für die Option ok_languages. Beispiel: ok_languages de en es fr it Sehr gut funktioniert momentan auch Greylisting. Ich verwende das Paket greylistd, dass sehr leicht in Exim 4 integriert werden kann. Allerdings solltest Du alle Netze, aus denen Ihr regelmässig Nachrichten erhaltet, in /etc/greylistd/whitelist-hosts eintragen, da die Annahme von Post unbekannter Absender durch das Greylisting verzögert wird.
Re: X upgrade changed modifier key definitions
Em Sat, 19 Jun 2004 20:30:12 +0200, Micha Feigin escreveu: My window key is now recognized under emacs as H-s whatever that means Hyper. -- Leandro Guimares Faria Corsetti Dutra +55 (11) 5685 2219 Av Sgto Geraldo Santana, 1100 6/71[EMAIL PROTECTED] 04.674-000 So Paulo, SPBRASIL http://br.geocities.com./lgcdutra/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X upgrade changed modifier key definitions
The latest X upgrade in sid seems to have changed the key definitions for some of the modifiers. Did anyone else notice that? My window key is now recognized under emacs as H-s whatever that means and it seems that the alt is also making problems (I don't think it is recognized as meta under fvwm, although it is under emacs). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: X upgrade, Wheel mouse stopped working -fixed
Graham Campbell wrote: On Friday 20 February 2004 09:40 pm, Erik Steffl wrote: Graham Campbell wrote: On Friday 20 February 2004 08:14 pm, Erik Steffl wrote: Graham Campbell wrote: I just applied the latest X upgrades to Woody. My wheel mouse stopped scrolling (rest works ok). Here is the relevant entries from /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 : Section InputDevice Identifier Configured Mouse Driver mouse Option CorePointer Option Device/dev/psaux Option Protocol ImPS/2 Option Emulate3Buttons true Option ZAxisMapping 4 5 EndSection Section InputDevice Identifier Generic Mouse Driver mouse Option SendCoreEventstrue Option Device/dev/input/mice Option Protocol ImPS/2 Option Emulate3Buttons true Option ZAxisMapping 4 5 EndSection what does xev say? are you running gpm? xev says nothing when I roll the wheel. I am not running gpm (as far as I know - this is a new distribution for me) try different protocol (for logitech I use MouseManPlusPS/2), I know it didn't always work the way docs said (as far as I can tell) so maybe the protocol you use doesn't work for your mouse anymore. Make sure that you change protocol of the mouse that is actually used (later in the X config) erik Problem fixed by reverting to an old version of XF86Config-4. Unfortunately due to fuzzy thinking and fumble fingers, I no longer have the version that caused the problem, so I cannot guess what the change was that caused the problem. However the Mouse configuration entries were the same between the two!! I had this problem. Got it fixed by simple deleting /lib/modules/*..*/usbmouse.o (and restarted X) This module was getting loaded by the system, but when it was present the mouse didn't work right. I think I have a different mouse, (Microsoft Wireless USB Intellimouse Explorer 7 button wheelmouse) I tried gobs of stuff only thing that worked was getting rid of usbmouse.o (and then restarted X). -Ben. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: X upgrade, Wheel mouse stopped working -fixed
On Friday 20 February 2004 09:40 pm, Erik Steffl wrote: Graham Campbell wrote: On Friday 20 February 2004 08:14 pm, Erik Steffl wrote: Graham Campbell wrote: I just applied the latest X upgrades to Woody. My wheel mouse stopped scrolling (rest works ok). Here is the relevant entries from /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 : Section InputDevice Identifier Configured Mouse Driver mouse Option CorePointer Option Device/dev/psaux Option Protocol ImPS/2 Option Emulate3Buttons true Option ZAxisMapping 4 5 EndSection Section InputDevice Identifier Generic Mouse Driver mouse Option SendCoreEventstrue Option Device/dev/input/mice Option Protocol ImPS/2 Option Emulate3Buttons true Option ZAxisMapping 4 5 EndSection what does xev say? are you running gpm? xev says nothing when I roll the wheel. I am not running gpm (as far as I know - this is a new distribution for me) try different protocol (for logitech I use MouseManPlusPS/2), I know it didn't always work the way docs said (as far as I can tell) so maybe the protocol you use doesn't work for your mouse anymore. Make sure that you change protocol of the mouse that is actually used (later in the X config) erik Problem fixed by reverting to an old version of XF86Config-4. Unfortunately due to fuzzy thinking and fumble fingers, I no longer have the version that caused the problem, so I cannot guess what the change was that caused the problem. However the Mouse configuration entries were the same between the two!! -- Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] aka [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: X upgrade, Wheel mouse stopped working -fixed
On Saturday 21 February 2004 16:57, Graham Campbell wrote: [...] due to fuzzy thinking and fumble fingers, I no longer have the version that caused the problem, so I cannot guess what the change was that caused the problem. However the Mouse configuration entries were the same between the two!! Rats! I've never had a wheel working under linux, and I was following this thread sure the solution would be revealed... -- richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: X upgrade, Wheel mouse stopped working -fixed
Richard Lyons wrote: Rats! I've never had a wheel working under linux, and I was following this thread sure the solution would be revealed... Richard, To make the wheel work under X change your /etc/X11/XF86Config file so that the line in the Pointer section that now reads: Protocolps/2 change it to: Protocolimps/2 And restart X Pete -- http://www.elbnet.com ELB Internet Service, Inc. Web Design, Computer Consulting, Internet Hosting -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: X upgrade, Wheel mouse stopped working -fixed
due to fuzzy thinking and fumble fingers, I no longer have the version that caused the problem, so I cannot guess what the change was that caused the problem. However the Mouse configuration entries were the same between the two!! Rats! I've never had a wheel working under linux, and I was following this thread sure the solution would be revealed... I've just subscribed. Pardon me for not having time to look up previous posts, but here is what I have in my /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 on a Debian stable: -- Section InputDevice Identifier Configured Mouse Driver mouse Option CorePointer Option Device/dev/psaux Option Protocol ImPS/2 Option ZAxisMapping 4 5 EndSection Section InputDevice Identifier Generic Mouse Driver mouse Option SendCoreEventstrue Option Device/dev/input/mice Option Protocol ImPS/2 Option ZAxisMapping 4 5 EndSection Section ServerLayout [...] InputDevice Configured Mouse InputDevice Generic Mouse EndSection -- I've never bothered to check if one of these entries is superfluous. Works like a charme. Mouse is a crossing myself M$ IntelliMouse. -- Bye, Kai -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: X upgrade, Wheel mouse stopped working -fixed
On Saturday 21 February 2004 19:52, Peter Billson wrote: Richard Lyons wrote: Rats! I've never had a wheel working under linux, and I was following this thread sure the solution would be revealed... Richard, To make the wheel work under X change your /etc/X11/XF86Config file so that the line in the Pointer section that now reads: Protocolps/2 change it to: Protocolimps/2 And restart X Embarassingly easy. Thanks. I suppose I was being a bit wet about that little problem because I didn't care much -- truth is I never used a wheel mouse at all before. Still, it is quite neat. Might get to quite like it. So, thanks again. -- richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X upgrade, Wheel mouse stopped working
I just applied the latest X upgrades to Woody. My wheel mouse stopped scrolling (rest works ok). Here is the relevant entries from /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 : Section InputDevice Identifier Configured Mouse Driver mouse Option CorePointer Option Device/dev/psaux Option Protocol ImPS/2 Option Emulate3Buttons true Option ZAxisMapping 4 5 EndSection Section InputDevice Identifier Generic Mouse Driver mouse Option SendCoreEventstrue Option Device/dev/input/mice Option Protocol ImPS/2 Option Emulate3Buttons true Option ZAxisMapping 4 5 EndSection Any help would be appreciated. Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] aka [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: X upgrade, Wheel mouse stopped working
Graham Campbell wrote: I just applied the latest X upgrades to Woody. My wheel mouse stopped scrolling (rest works ok). Here is the relevant entries from /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 : Section InputDevice Identifier Configured Mouse Driver mouse Option CorePointer Option Device/dev/psaux Option Protocol ImPS/2 Option Emulate3Buttons true Option ZAxisMapping 4 5 EndSection Section InputDevice Identifier Generic Mouse Driver mouse Option SendCoreEventstrue Option Device/dev/input/mice Option Protocol ImPS/2 Option Emulate3Buttons true Option ZAxisMapping 4 5 EndSection what does xev say? are you running gpm? erik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: X upgrade, Wheel mouse stopped working
On Friday 20 February 2004 08:14 pm, Erik Steffl wrote: Graham Campbell wrote: I just applied the latest X upgrades to Woody. My wheel mouse stopped scrolling (rest works ok). Here is the relevant entries from /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 : Section InputDevice Identifier Configured Mouse Driver mouse Option CorePointer Option Device/dev/psaux Option Protocol ImPS/2 Option Emulate3Buttons true Option ZAxisMapping 4 5 EndSection Section InputDevice Identifier Generic Mouse Driver mouse Option SendCoreEventstrue Option Device/dev/input/mice Option Protocol ImPS/2 Option Emulate3Buttons true Option ZAxisMapping 4 5 EndSection what does xev say? are you running gpm? xev says nothing when I roll the wheel. I am not running gpm (as far as I know - this is a new distribution for me) Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] aka [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: X upgrade, Wheel mouse stopped working
Graham Campbell wrote: On Friday 20 February 2004 08:14 pm, Erik Steffl wrote: Graham Campbell wrote: I just applied the latest X upgrades to Woody. My wheel mouse stopped scrolling (rest works ok). Here is the relevant entries from /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 : Section InputDevice Identifier Configured Mouse Driver mouse Option CorePointer Option Device/dev/psaux Option Protocol ImPS/2 Option Emulate3Buttons true Option ZAxisMapping 4 5 EndSection Section InputDevice Identifier Generic Mouse Driver mouse Option SendCoreEventstrue Option Device/dev/input/mice Option Protocol ImPS/2 Option Emulate3Buttons true Option ZAxisMapping 4 5 EndSection what does xev say? are you running gpm? xev says nothing when I roll the wheel. I am not running gpm (as far as I know - this is a new distribution for me) try different protocol (for logitech I use MouseManPlusPS/2), I know it didn't always work the way docs said (as far as I can tell) so maybe the protocol you use doesn't work for your mouse anymore. Make sure that you change protocol of the mouse that is actually used (later in the X config) erik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: X upgrade von experimental
Michael Kebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ein apt-get install -t experimental x-window-system upgraded mir nur das x-window-system Paket. Ein apt-get upgrade -t experimental upgraded mir ja alle Pakete, was natürlich nicht verlangt ist. Ich glaube das Beispiel hier hilft Dir: URL:http://dri.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/Download#head-23e7 8008e2cfec027df1a2b91af770a551b24b13 Jakob -- Gnus sieht gut aus. Guckst Du: http://www.jl42.de/pub/gnus/desktop_03.jpg de.comm.software.gnus http://www.jl42.de/pub/gnus/gnus-group-buffer_03.jpg http://my.gnus.org http://www.jl42.de/pub/gnus/gnus-summary-buffer_03.jpg Wie das klappt? = http://my.gnus.org/node/view/39 -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: [SOLVED] X upgrade von experimental
Hab jetzt einfach ein bissel rumgefummelt... Mit dpkg -l | grep 4.3.0 habe ich alle Pakete bekommen, die aus experimental waren (Xfree pakete hatten Version 4.3.0-0pre1v4). nun hab ich aus den Zeilen wie ii xdm4.3.0-0pre1v4 X display manager den Paketnamen rausgefischt. dpkg -l |grep 4.3.0 | sed -e s/ii \([a-zA-Z0-9-]*\).*/\1/ gibt mir dann nur die Paketnamen. nun noch einfach: dpkg -l |grep 4.3.0 | sed -e s/ii \([a-zA-Z0-9-]*\).*/\1/ |xargs apt-get -t experimental install Und schon wurden die gewollten Pakete geupgradet. Gruss Michael -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: [SOLVED] X upgrade von experimental
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.Michael Kebe wrote: dpkg -l |grep 4.3.0 | sed -e s/ii \([a-zA-Z0-9-]*\).*/\1/ |xargs apt-get -t experimental install Und schon wurden die gewollten Pakete geupgradet. Theoretisch ja, aber leider hatte ich dann ein paar ungelöste Abhängigkeiten. Irgendwie wurden die Pakete in einer falschen Reihenfolge installiert oder so, wer interesse hat es sich genau anzugucken siehe Anhang. Hab dann per Hand alle ungelösten Deps gelöst, und nun geht alles :) Gruss Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] cat xfree-experimental-upgradedpkg |xargs sudo apt-get -t experim ental --yes install Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following extra packages will be installed: libice6 libsm6 libx11-6 libxext6 libxft1 libxi6 libxmu6 libxmuu1 libxp6 libxpm4 libxrandr2 libxt6 libxtrap6 libxtst6 libxv1 Suggested packages: xlibs-dev configlet-frontends read-edid mdetect rsh-server The following NEW packages will be installed: libice6 libsm6 libx11-6 libxext6 libxft1 libxi6 libxmu6 libxmuu1 libxp6 libxpm4 libxrandr2 libxt6 libxtrap6 libxtst6 libxv1 The following packages will be upgraded: lbxproxy libdps1 libxaw7 proxymngr twm x-window-system x-window-system-core xbase-clients xdm xfonts-100dpi xfonts-75dpi xfonts-base xfonts-scalable xfree86-common xfs xfwp xlibmesa-dri xlibmesa-gl xlibmesa-glu xlibs xlibs-data xnest xprt xserver-common xserver-xfree86 xspecs xterm xutils xvfb 29 upgraded, 15 newly installed, 0 to remove and 130 not upgraded. Need to get 46.2MB of archives. After unpacking 6480kB of additional disk space will be used. download Fetched 46.2MB in 11m17s (68.2kB/s) Preconfiguring packages ... Selecting previously deselected package libice6. (Reading database ... 50322 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libice6 (from .../libice6_4.3.0-0pre1v5_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libice6_4.3.0-0pre1v5_i386.deb (- -unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6.3', which is also in package xl ibs dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Selecting previously deselected package libsm6. Unpacking libsm6 (from .../libsm6_4.3.0-0pre1v5_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libsm6_4.3.0-0pre1v5_i386.deb (-- unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6.0', which is also in package xli bs dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Selecting previously deselected package libxext6. Unpacking libxext6 (from .../libxext6_4.3.0-0pre1v5_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libxext6_4.3.0-0pre1v5_i386.deb ( --unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6.4', which is also in package x libs dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Selecting previously deselected package libxt6. Unpacking libxt6 (from .../libxt6_4.3.0-0pre1v5_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libxt6_4.3.0-0pre1v5_i386.deb (-- unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6.0', which is also in package xli bs dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Selecting previously deselected package libxmu6. Unpacking libxmu6 (from .../libxmu6_4.3.0-0pre1v5_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libxmu6_4.3.0-0pre1v5_i386.deb (- -unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/X11R6/lib/libXmu.so.6.2', which is also in package xl ibs dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Selecting previously deselected package libxpm4. Unpacking libxpm4 (from .../libxpm4_4.3.0-0pre1v5_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libxpm4_4.3.0-0pre1v5_i386.deb (- -unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4.11', which is also in package x libs dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Preparing to replace libxaw7 4.3.0-0pre1v4 (using .../libxaw7_4.3.0-0pre1v5_i386 .deb) ... Unpacking replacement libxaw7 ... Preparing to replace xfree86-common 4.3.0-0pre1v4 (using .../xfree86-common_4.3. 0-0pre1v5_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement xfree86-common ... Preparing to replace xlibs 4.3.0-0pre1v4 (using .../xlibs_4.3.0-0pre1v5_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement xlibs ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/xlibs_4.3.0-0pre1v5_all.deb (--un pack): trying to overwrite `/etc/X11/xkb/README', which is also in package xlibs-data dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Preparing to replace xlibs-data
Re: [SOLVED] X upgrade von experimental
Michael Kebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hab jetzt einfach ein bissel rumgefummelt... Mit dpkg -l | grep 4.3.0 habe ich alle Pakete bekommen, die aus experimental waren (Xfree pakete hatten Version 4.3.0-0pre1v4). [...] dpkg -l |grep 4.3.0 | sed -e s/ii \([a-zA-Z0-9-]*\).*/\1/ |xargs apt-get -t experimental install Und schon wurden die gewollten Pakete geupgradet. Weniger aufwendig: apt-get -t experimental install `grep-status -F Version 4.3.0-0pre1v4 -sPackage -n` Ich weiss, zu spaet. ;-) cu andreas -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: [SOLVED] X upgrade von experimental
Andreas Metzler wrote: Ich weiss, zu spaet. ;-) Trotzdem danke! -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
X upgrade von experimental
Hallo, habe vor einigen Monaten X aus experimental installiert, da ich 4.3 für meine Grafikkarte brauche. Ich habe gesehen, dass X wieder in experimental geupdated ist, also wollte ich versuchen es upzugraden (was ein Unwort). Ein apt-get install -t experimental x-window-system upgraded mir nur das x-window-system Paket. Ein apt-get upgrade -t experimental upgraded mir ja alle Pakete, was natürlich nicht verlangt ist. Also gibt es eine Möglichkeit x-window-system und alle davon abhängigen Pakete mit einem Befehl zu upgraden? Als alternative würde mir ein remove und install einfallen oder aber alles von Hand zu upgraden (vielleicht mit Hilfe von aptitude, mit dem man gut die Abhängigkeiten durchlaufen kann). Aber vielleicht kann man ja was neues lernen... Google hat mir zwar genau das gleich Problem gegeben, doch leider konnte es keiner beantworten: http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2003/debian-user-200310/msg03574.html Gruss Michael -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: X upgrade broke DRI
This one time, at band camp, Colin Watson said: As far as I know, you need at least 2.4.20-pre5 to get DRI with XFree86 4.2. -- Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] steve@gashuffer:~$ uname -a Linux gashuffer.lobefin.net 2.4.20-rc1 #1 SMP Sun Nov 3 14:05:24 EST 2002 i686 Pentium III (Coppermine) GenuineIntel GNU/Linux steve@gashuffer:~$ glxinfo name of display: :0.0 display: :0 screen: 0 direct rendering: Yes steve@gashuffer:~$ glxgears 2841 frames in 5.0 seconds = 568.200 FPS 3498 frames in 5.0 seconds = 699.600 FPS 3485 frames in 5.0 seconds = 697.000 FPS 3488 frames in 5.0 seconds = 697.600 FPS As always, Colin, you are a gentleman and a scholar. Thanks, Steve -- SCCS, the source motel! Programs check in and never check out! -- Ken Thompson msg10801/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
X upgrade broke DRI
Hello all, Up until today, I had DRI support with my ATI Rage 128 card, using the ati driver and X 4.1. Today's upgrade (running sarge) noticeably dropped my frame rate, so I did some looking around. stevegashuffer:~$ glxinfo name of display: :0.0 display: :0 screen: 0 direct rendering: No lot snipped snip from /var/log/XFree86.0.log: (II) R128(0): [drm] created r128 driver at busid PCI:1:0:0 (II) R128(0): [drm] added 8192 byte SAREA at 0xe0949000 (II) R128(0): [drm] mapped SAREA 0xe0949000 to 0x40014000 (II) R128(0): [drm] framebuffer handle = 0xd800 (II) R128(0): [drm] added 1 reserved context for kernel (EE) R128(0): [dri] R128DRIScreenInit failed because of a version mismatch. [dri] r128.o kernel module version is 2.1.6 but version 2.2 or greater is needed. [dri] Disabling the DRI. (EE) R128(0): [drm] failed to remove DRM signal handler (II) R128(0): [drm] removed 1 reserved context for kernel DRIUnlock called when not locked (II) R128(0): [drm] unmapping 8192 bytes of SAREA 0xe0949000 at 0x40014000 This implies too old a kernel, but: stevegashuffer:~$ uname -a Linux gashuffer.lobefin.net 2.4.19 #2 SMP Wed Aug 28 12:14:22 EDT 2002 i686 Pentium III (Coppermine) GenuineIntel GNU/Linux The drop is quite noticeable - I get about 160 fps in glxgears, now, and IIRC getting in the neighborhood of 600 before the upgrade. Anybody know where I can start digging, or better yet, how to fix this? And yes, I have tried the r128 module - same results. It appears to load both modules in any case, no matter which I specify. Steve -- furbling, v.: Having to wander through a maze of ropes at an airport or bank even when you are the only person in line. -- Rich Hall, Sniglets msg10664/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: X upgrade broke DRI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 02 November 2002 23:31, Stephen Gran wrote: Hello all, Up until today, I had DRI support with my ATI Rage 128 card, using the ati driver and X 4.1. Today's upgrade (running sarge) noticeably dropped my frame rate, so I did some looking around. [...] snip from /var/log/XFree86.0.log: (II) R128(0): [drm] created r128 driver at busid PCI:1:0:0 (II) R128(0): [drm] added 8192 byte SAREA at 0xe0949000 (II) R128(0): [drm] mapped SAREA 0xe0949000 to 0x40014000 (II) R128(0): [drm] framebuffer handle = 0xd800 (II) R128(0): [drm] added 1 reserved context for kernel (EE) R128(0): [dri] R128DRIScreenInit failed because of a version mismatch. [dri] r128.o kernel module version is 2.1.6 but version 2.2 or greater is needed. [dri] Disabling the DRI. (EE) R128(0): [drm] failed to remove DRM signal handler (II) R128(0): [drm] removed 1 reserved context for kernel DRIUnlock called when not locked (II) R128(0): [drm] unmapping 8192 bytes of SAREA 0xe0949000 at 0x40014000 This implies too old a kernel, but: [...] The drop is quite noticeable - I get about 160 fps in glxgears, now, and IIRC getting in the neighborhood of 600 before the upgrade. Anybody know where I can start digging, or better yet, how to fix this? Have a look at http://dri.sourceforge.net. Somewhere on that site are the DRM drivers. The DRM drivers are not part of the kernel core but maintained by the DRI project and dependencies between DRI and DRM are really tight. - -- Embedded Linux -- True multitasking! TWO TOASTS AT THE SAME TIME! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9xFfMeOF0+zcVdv8RAhDuAJ0S8PsMh4+CsB27APMYJXUMFvSo3wCbBeWA 2086lDVFl6tAHgqjLxC3+Ls= =sXE1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem mit Tastatur unter X nach X-upgrade
Hallo, ich bin ja kein profi und trotzdem von debian begeistert nun hab ich endlich DSL, und es funktioniert auch, und mache nen upgrade, war noetig! Aber jetzt hab ich Probleme mit der Tastatur unter X, die Taste AltGr funktioniert nicht mehr, oder zumindest nicht so wie sie sollte, soll heissen, ich kann weder nen 'at'-Zeichen noch nen senkrechten strich (fuer pipe) unter X machen. Ich habe in den X-Logs folgende Fehler bemerkt: -- schnipp -- The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports: Error:No Symbols named de in the include file de Exiting Abandoning symbols file default Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server -- schnapp -- Wie genau ich dazu komme oder wie ich es wieder hinbekommen koennte weiss ich leider nicht, dazu fehlt mir auch die erfahrung mit X. mfg Marcus!! -- --- Marcus Fritzsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- / Why should I try to explain 'multitasking' to a windows user? / - -- Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: Problem mit Tastatur unter X nach X-upgrade
Du benutzt jetzt Woody? Wenn ja solltest Du durch einen dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86 denn XServer neu konfigurieren können. Wähle dort als XKB rule xfree86 und als Modell pc105. Du kannst mir aber auch einfach mal Deine /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 als PM zuschicken. Dann kann ich Dir vielleicht sagen, wo genau der Fehler in der Konfiguration liegt. Sebastian -- Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: X upgrade / downgrade / upgrade??
Andrew M.A. Cater said:
effect. I may have a mixture of 3.3.6 and 4.0.9 packages. Help
me clear this one up to restore my X please!
ive had mixtures before too.. i usually remove everything
and purge everything and apt-get clean and reinstall.
run through the package listing and look for something like
xfree86-common for xfree 3.3.6 or xserver-common for xfree 4
and remove/purge it. this should remove EVERYTHING that depends
on X. all the apps, all the servers etc. i purge it all out
and start fresh.
before reinstalling anything though scan the package list.
incase you don't know the commands, this is what i usually
do:
apt-get remove xserver-common
dpkg --get-selections | grep deinstall | awk '{print $1}' | xargs dpkg
--purge
(note the above dpkg line is 1 line not 2)
apt-get clean
(start reinstalling apps here)
worked for me everytime, i rather keep things simple and
redownload then trying to work with dependencies.
note the above may remove a ton of stuff, if you don't like
that then don't do it. it will also purge all the config
files and stuff, so backup what you think you may want to keep.
nate
X upgrade / downgrade / upgrade??
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, Problem: (work) I have a Compaq Deskpro 5200MMX 200M Pentium machine - lots of software on the disk, lots of users. The disk was originally in a Compaq Deskpro P166 - I upgraded hardware and memory to a new machine with new CD-RW etc. The video card on the Compaq 5200MMX is essentially barely supported under X. The card is a hacked S3 Virge which advertises itself as an S3 Virge DX/GX. It has 2M of memory. Under XFree 3.3.6 it would work with the old S3 server. It is not, as far as I know, supported under XFree 4.0. Card on the P166 was an embedded Cirrus Logic card (5446) working under XFree 4 There is a known series of bugs with this S3Virge card under X: it garbles text consoles, is unstable etc. - I did, however, try to reinstall XFree 3.3.6 to no effect. I attempted to remove 3.36 packages and removed the card. Losing patience, I installed a Matrox Millenium 2MB card and the XFree 4 servers. Now, I get an immediate error starting X can't open socket - - make sure no other X is running or words to that effect. I may have a mixture of 3.3.6 and 4.0.9 packages. Help me clear this one up to restore my X please! Andy -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE78uCsMjPBJ+k63nsRAqOLAJ41Xvjcd9YK8rXO+BHi6BJMR79GXwCdEVXc gDM342jzvJzFrXTf7r095dU= =j0CC -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: X upgrade / downgrade / upgrade??
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 09:22:39PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: Losing patience, I installed a Matrox Millenium 2MB card and the XFree 4 servers. Now, I get an immediate error starting X can't open socket - - make sure no other X is running or words to that effect. I may have a mixture of 3.3.6 and 4.0.9 packages. Help me clear this one up to restore my X please! I think all you need to do is to remove the .X* files in /tmp. FGL
Re: [typo@netcabo.pt: X upgrade broke NVIDIA binary driver]
I don't know if you care about binary drivers but the last X upgrade broke 3D/DRI/GLX in the nvidia's driver. you might have to change the display card driver to nvidia from nv. I had to do that as well as install the nvidia driver packages as mentioned by Dominique HTH Shri __ Do You Yahoo!? Find a job, post your resume. http://careers.yahoo.com
[typo@netcabo.pt: X upgrade broke NVIDIA binary driver]
Can someone who uses NVIDIA's binary-only drivers with Debian's X packages help this guy out? -- G. Branden Robinson|I am sorry, but what you have Debian GNU/Linux |mistaken for malicious intent is [EMAIL PROTECTED] |nothing more than sheer http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |incompetence! -- J. L. Rizzo II ---BeginMessage--- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I don't know if you care about binary drivers but the last X upgrade broke 3D/DRI/GLX in the nvidia's driver. glxinfo shows: name of display: :1.0 @@Created GLX Context.. display: :1 screen: 0 direct rendering: No server glx vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation server glx version string: 1.2 server glx extensions: client glx vendor string: Brian Paul client glx version string: 1.2 Mesa 3.0 client glx extensions: GLX_utah_direct_0_2, GLX_no_accel GLX extensions: OpenGL vendor string: `Q^D899,@256/AGP OpenGL renderer string: `Q^D899,@256/AGP OpenGL version string: `Q^D899,@256/AGP OpenGL extensions: GL_EXT_paletted_texture, GL_EXT_shared_texture_palette glu version: 1.2 Mesa 3.2 beta 1 glu extensions: GL_EXT_abgr visual x bf lv rg d st colorbuffer ax dp st accumbuffer ms cav id dep cl sp sz l ci b ro r g b a bf th cl r g b a ns b eat - -- 0x21 16 tc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 0 16 16 16 16 0 0 None 0x22 16 dc 0 16 0 r . . 5 6 5 0 0 16 0 16 16 16 16 0 0 None 0x2a 16 tc 0 16 0 r . . 5 6 5 0 0 16 0 16 16 16 16 0 0 None 0x2b 16 tc 0 16 0 r . . 5 6 5 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None 0x2c 16 tc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None 0x2d 16 dc 0 16 0 r . . 5 6 5 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None 0x2e 16 dc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 0 16 16 16 16 0 0 None 0x2f 16 dc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None For a Geforce 2 MX AGP and dmesg: NVRM: loading NVIDIA kernel module version 1.0-1541 NVRM: AGPGART: Intel 440BX chipset NVRM: AGPGART: aperture: 64M @ 0xe800 NVRM: AGPGART: aperture mapped from 0xe800 to 0xcd959000 NVRM: AGPGART: mode 2x NVRM: AGPGART: allocated 16 pages NVRM: AGPGART: freed 16 pages NVRM: AGPGART: backend released NVRM: AGPGART: Intel 440BX chipset NVRM: AGPGART: aperture: 64M @ 0xe800 NVRM: AGPGART: aperture mapped from 0xe800 to 0xcd959000 NVRM: AGPGART: mode 2x NVRM: AGPGART: allocated 16 pages NVRM: AGPGART: freed 16 pages NVRM: AGPGART: backend released I didn't submit this as a bug report because I don't know which of the packages in X caused this. I tried this with 2.2.19, 2.2.20 and 2.4.13 kernels, they all show roughly the same symptons. I did reinstall the driver after I upgraded X, so the problem isn't there. And I am absolutely sure it's not a hardware problem. I put the board in a computer with an older version of X and it worked, when I upgraded X it stopped working in the exact same way. If this was already reported of if you don't care about binary modules, I apologize. Greetings from Portugal, Pedro. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE76AgB2SBo0jBmgGARAor2AKDCMFsOVcdKhA2EAq9M4i2COPGIYQCZAVAk ClyDtI7MyDstx7XjEcUimiw= =DsAn -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message--- pgpfWy6V6wMPi.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [typo@netcabo.pt: X upgrade broke NVIDIA binary driver]
On Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:27:19 -0500, Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Branden Can someone who uses NVIDIA's binary-only drivers with Debian's X Branden packages help this guy out? Pedro, You should download NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-.tar.gz from NVidia's website (http://www.nvidia.com/view.asp?PAGE=linux), and execute as root (once extracted) the following order: make install This will update the needed /usr/lib/libGL* files with NVidia's. Also after a kernel recompile you should do the same with package NVIDIA_kernel-1.0-.tar.gz Hope this helps... -- Dominique Deleris http://potatoworld.tuxfamily.org
X upgrade failure
Hello all, I'm having a problemthat I just saw the other day. I just upgraded X to 4.1.0-7 I believe, and it fails on startup. I get the error no such file or directory when it looks for ~/.xsession, and I remeber seeing that this is related to a line in one of the new configutration files. ~/.xsession is of course there, although it's permissions are 644 - perhaps they need to be changed. Could someone point me to where the problem is, as I was assuming this would be fixed before it made it into testing? Sorry for not paying better attention to things I thought wouldn't bite me. Thanks, Steve -- Under every stone lurks a politician. -- Aristophanes pgp0CqzfgDk1K.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: X upgrade failure
Thus spake Stephen Gran: Hello all, I'm having a problemthat I just saw the other day. I just upgraded X to 4.1.0-7 I believe, and it fails on startup. I get the error no such file or directory when it looks for ~/.xsession, and I remeber seeing that this is related to a line in one of the new configutration files. ~/.xsession is of course there, although it's permissions are 644 - perhaps they need to be changed. Could someone point me to where the problem is, as I was assuming this would be fixed before it made it into testing? Sorry for not paying better attention to things I thought wouldn't bite me. Thanks, Steve Sorry to post out of panic, all. My brain finally kicked in and I followed the trail of scripts until I remembered that you had to remove the qoutes. /panic Thanks again, Steve -- Likewise, the national appetizer, brine-cured herring with raw onions, wins few friends, Germans excepted. -- Darwin Porter Scandinavia On $50 A Day pgpVjOkSFAQ9x.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: xdm takes ages to start after X upgrade
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Martin Albert wrote: On Thursday 15 February 2001 13:42, David Purton wrote: mmm - I knew one problem was hoping for too much. I think I remember a post about this before but I can't find it in the archives. Since upgrading to Woody and X 4 xdm takes a lng time to start (like a minute or so) Does anyone know how to fix this? i dodn't follow the thread you mentioned to it's end, but my assumption was an uncommented CHOOSER line in /etc/X11/Xaccess. It does look to be this sort of problem, but everything is commented out in the /etc/X11/xdm/Xaccess file. Today people in droves hurry up past Heumoz to Villars on the road to the ski hills, so they can rush down them as fast as possible, so they can hurry up again in order to rush down again. In a way this is funny,... Francis A Schaeffer David Purton http://www.chariot.net.au/~dcpurton/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xdm takes ages to start after X upgrade SOLVEDish
I'v solved this prob by changing this line in xdm-config from true to false: ! All displays should use authorization. ! X terminals may not be configured that way, so they will require ! individualized resource settings. DisplayManager*authorize: false but it suggests it should be true - why? and if this is important can I set it up so there isn't the delay starting? On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Martin Albert wrote: On Thursday 15 February 2001 13:42, David Purton wrote: mmm - I knew one problem was hoping for too much. I think I remember a post about this before but I can't find it in the archives. Since upgrading to Woody and X 4 xdm takes a lng time to start (like a minute or so) Does anyone know how to fix this? i dodn't follow the thread you mentioned to it's end, but my assumption was an uncommented CHOOSER line in /etc/X11/Xaccess. Today people in droves hurry up past Heumoz to Villars on the road to the ski hills, so they can rush down them as fast as possible, so they can hurry up again in order to rush down again. In a way this is funny,... Francis A Schaeffer David Purton http://www.chariot.net.au/~dcpurton/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xdm takes ages to start after X upgrade
(someone please forward this to the original poster) please try to enable an x font server as well as portmap/sunrpc services, and see if the problem persists. if it does, then no clue. if the above solves it, then welcome to my boat. we can team up to find a solution... martin [greetings from the heart of the sun]# echo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1:[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@@.net -- . `___ (o-(o-(o-(o- (o-(o-(o- /\/| | | //\//\//\//\ //\//\//\ ` /\/\/l-+-| v_/_ v_/_ v_/_ v_/_ v_/_ v_/_ v_/_.` /\/\/|_|_|
Re: xdm takes ages to start after X upgrade SOLVEDish
On Friday 16 February 2001 13:28, David Purton wrote: I'v solved this prob by changing this line in xdm-config from true to false: ! All displays should use authorization. ! X terminals may not be configured that way, so they will require ! individualized resource settings. DisplayManager*authorize: false but it suggests it should be true - why? and if this is important can I set it up so there isn't the delay starting? Well, after that i recently started to find garbled fileentries in / containing MIT-COOKIES i'ld think this might make a point. martin
Re: xdm takes ages to start after X upgrade SOLVEDish
On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, Martin Albert wrote: On Friday 16 February 2001 13:28, David Purton wrote: I'v solved this prob by changing this line in xdm-config from true to false: ! All displays should use authorization. ! X terminals may not be configured that way, so they will require ! individualized resource settings. DisplayManager*authorize: false but it suggests it should be true - why? and if this is important can I set it up so there isn't the delay starting? Well, after that i recently started to find garbled fileentries in / containing MIT-COOKIES i'ld think this might make a point. ooo , you mean like a file called pf,@@ ? what is a MIT_COOKIE? I also got these files in /etc/X11 and /etc/X11/xdm, but that was before I changed the above authorization line. Today people in droves hurry up past Heumoz to Villars on the road to the ski hills, so they can rush down them as fast as possible, so they can hurry up again in order to rush down again. In a way this is funny,... Francis A Schaeffer David Purton http://www.chariot.net.au/~dcpurton/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xdm takes ages to start after X upgrade
mmm - I knew one problem was hoping for too much. I think I remember a post about this before but I can't find it in the archives. Since upgrading to Woody and X 4 xdm takes a lng time to start (like a minute or so) Does anyone know how to fix this? Today people in droves hurry up past Heumoz to Villars on the road to the ski hills, so they can rush down them as fast as possible, so they can hurry up again in order to rush down again. In a way this is funny,... Francis A Schaeffer David Purton http://www.chariot.net.au/~dcpurton/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XDMCP broken after X upgrade
Hello, I updated X on my slink box from www.debian.org/~vincent and everything seems to have gone smoothly, but now when attempting an XDM login from another machine, I get the message: XDMCP: Manager unwilling. Host unwilling. I'm guessing that some new configuration file might have been inserted during the X upgrade. Am I on the right track? Has anyone experienced this, or know how to fix it? Thanks. -- David Karlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by Debian GNU/Linux
Re: XDMCP broken after X upgrade
On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, David Karlin wrote: I'm guessing that some new configuration file might have been inserted during the X upgrade. Am I on the right track? Has anyone experienced this, or know how to fix it? Edit things in /etc/X11/xdm - I think it was pretty obvois IIRC. Oddly, it was decided that xdm is some kind of security risk - I personally don't see why.. Jason
Re: XDMCP broken after X upgrade
Hi, On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 07:46:42PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: Edit things in /etc/X11/xdm - I think it was pretty obvois IIRC. Oddly, it was decided that xdm is some kind of security risk - I personally don't see why.. Jason The config file in question is /etc/X11/xdm/Xaccess. BTW, I only allow xdm logins from within my LAN, so I guess the security risk is minimal Thanks. -- David Karlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by Debian GNU/Linux
X upgrade on Slink
I upgraded Slink and found that the menu entry for Communicator no longer worked. There is a link in /usr/lib/netscape/46/communicator/communicator-smotif - ../../base-4/wrapper. That directory isn't there anymore. I removed the link, re-ran update-menus and the menu /Apps/Net/Communicator now works. Hope this saves some bandwidth. Wayne -- Command, n.: Statement presented by a human and accepted by a computer in such a manner as to make the human feel as if he is in control. ___
Re: X upgrade
On Wed, Oct 22, 1997 at 12:05:16PM +0100, G. Kapetanios wrote: Hi, From my mirror I see that the setup for X has changed considerably. I am wondering what is the correct procedure to upgrade. I have X 3.3-4 Here is what i think i should do. First upgrade xlib6 to 3.3.1-1, then remove xlib6-dev and everything that depnds on it and install xlib6-altdev, then install xlib6g and xlib6g-dev and then install all the xfnt and the rest of 3.3.1-1 Is this the right way ? Will I have any trouble ? Having a working X on my machine is critical for me. In this case you should not upgrade. The new X is a glibc version (3.3-4 is in bo, isn't it?). The server seems to be a bit unstable (sometimes it corrupts my consoles). So, if you are happy with bo, stay with it for a little bit longer. Thank you, Marcus PS: If you really need to upgrade, upgrade to libc6 first. Use the mini HOWTO by Scott Ellis to do it right. Once again: Read the mini-HOWTO carefully. Otherwise you are most likely going to cook your system. -- Rhubarb is no Egyptian god. Marcus Brinkmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/ -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
X upgrade
Hi, From my mirror I see that the setup for X has changed considerably. I am wondering what is the correct procedure to upgrade. I have X 3.3-4 Here is what i think i should do. First upgrade xlib6 to 3.3.1-1, then remove xlib6-dev and everything that depnds on it and install xlib6-altdev, then install xlib6g and xlib6g-dev and then install all the xfnt and the rest of 3.3.1-1 Is this the right way ? Will I have any trouble ? Having a working X on my machine is critical for me. Thanks George --- George Kapetanios Churchill College Cambridge, CB3 0DSE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] U.K. WWW: http://garfield.chu.cam.ac.uk/~gk205/work_info.html --- -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
