Xemacs vs. Emacs

1997-06-17 Thread Pedro I. Sanchez
Hello,

I remember seeing some messages in this list not long ago saying that
the maintainers of these two packages had agreed on a format that would
allow both to coexist in the same machine. What's the status of this?

I'd like to try Xemacs but I don't want to give up my old friend Emacs!

-- 
Pedro I. Sanchez


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Xemacs vs. Emacs

1997-06-17 Thread Buddha Buck
 Hello,
 
 I remember seeing some messages in this list not long ago saying that
 the maintainers of these two packages had agreed on a format that would
 allow both to coexist in the same machine. What's the status of this?

It works.  The XEmacs19 package and Emacs package from unstable (what 
will be Debian 2.0) coexist perfectly fine.  Until this morning I did 
have both of them installed.

If you want to try XEmacs, I'd suggest grabbing that installation

However, XEmacs19 as it currently stands in unstable doesn't work with 
the XFree86 3.3 binaries also in unstable.  So if you use dselect to 
install it via FTP, make certain that you do -not- upgrade your X 
packages.  XEmacs19 works fine with XFree86 3.2.  I'll probably 
reinstall XEmacs19 when the onflict between it and X is resolved.

 
 I'd like to try Xemacs but I don't want to give up my old friend Emacs!

XEmacs is just like Emacs, but a bit prettier, with a few new features, 
and only slightly slower.
 
 -- 
 Pedro I. Sanchez
 
 
-- 
 Buddha Buck  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just as the strength of the Internet is chaos, so the strength of our
liberty depends upon the chaos and cacaphony of the unfettered speech
the First Amendment protects.  -- A.L.A. v. U.S. Dept. of Justice


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .