Re: balsa: orphaned?
hzi wrote: Mensagem anterior No dia 26/07/01, 06:00:10, Erik Steffl [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu o seguinte sobre o tema balsa: orphaned?: what's up with balsa? there's a huge number of old bugs (year or two old) including the ne that makes it uninstallable (+2 month days): Grave functionality bugs - outstanding (A list of all such bugs used to be available). #98110: balsa: depends on libltdl0, which has been removed Package: balsa; Severity: grave; Reported by: Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 66 days old. anybody knows what's going on? Hey, Balsa is great, in that it uses Unix mbox, and you can use procmail with it. It shouldn't be orphaned, if it's tue, what a shame! I mean the debian package seems to be not taken care of, not balsa itself. there are quite a few bug (lot of them 1+ year old), it's not even installable (in unstable) - that's an 2+ months old bug (depends on non-existing library): balsa: Depends: libltdl0 but it is not installable erik
Re: balsa: orphaned?
Mensagem anterior No dia 26/07/01, 06:00:10, Erik Steffl [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu o seguinte sobre o tema balsa: orphaned?: what's up with balsa? there's a huge number of old bugs (year or two old) including the ne that makes it uninstallable (+2 month days): Grave functionality bugs - outstanding (A list of all such bugs used to be available). #98110: balsa: depends on libltdl0, which has been removed Package: balsa; Severity: grave; Reported by: Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 66 days old. anybody knows what's going on? Hey, Balsa is great, in that it uses Unix mbox, and you can use procmail with it. It shouldn't be orphaned, if it's tue, what a shame! Henry
Re: balsa: orphaned?
Yes balsa is a great program and should not be orphaned and if nobody is interesting in packaging it, I would certainly ITP it soon. By the way, I build on a nearly daily bases debian package from cvs. You can find my packages at the following url : http://ufies.org/~christophe Christophe Le jeu, 26 jui 2001 10:58:08, Erik Steffl a écrit : what's up with balsa? there's a huge number of old bugs (year or two old) including the ne that makes it uninstallable (+2 month days): Grave functionality bugs - outstanding (A list of all such bugs used to be available). #98110: balsa: depends on libltdl0, which has been removed Package: balsa; Severity: grave; Reported by: Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 66 days old. anybody knows what's going on? (I am looking for a MUA that supports IMAP (and SSL)) TIA erik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Christophe Barbé Software Engineer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lineo France - Lineo High Availability Group 42-46, rue Médéric - 92110 Clichy - France phone (33).1.41.40.02.12 - fax (33).1.41.40.02.01 http://www.lineo.com
Re: balsa: orphaned?
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 01:58:08AM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote: (I am looking for a MUA that supports IMAP (and SSL)) mutt is a very good choice, unless you absolutely must have a graphical mailer. It supports most mail protocols and mailbox formats, including IMAP and SSL. -- Kalle Hasselström, [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpStceUKbu4t.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: balsa: orphaned?
Yes balsa is a great program and should not be orphaned and if nobody is interesting in packaging it, I would certainly ITP it soon. Certainly doesn't look like it's been abandoned. This page, http://www.balsa.net/main.html, shows an update on the 13th of this month. It reads: 2001-07-13 - development balsa 1.1.7 released. This is most likely last 1.1.x development release, we intend to start soon preparation for 1.2.0 release. Several improvements in IMAP folder handling has been done, new command line options have been added and other UI improvements have been implemented. Regards Hall
Re: balsa: orphaned?
I believe that Erik said Orphaned from a packaging point of view. Balsa is in fact in a high development rate. It's a great mail client. Christophe Le ven, 27 jui 2001 14:26:06, Hall Stevenson a écrit : Yes balsa is a great program and should not be orphaned and if nobody is interesting in packaging it, I would certainly ITP it soon. Certainly doesn't look like it's been abandoned. This page, http://www.balsa.net/main.html, shows an update on the 13th of this month. It reads: 2001-07-13 - development balsa 1.1.7 released. This is most likely last 1.1.x development release, we intend to start soon preparation for 1.2.0 release. Several improvements in IMAP folder handling has been done, new command line options have been added and other UI improvements have been implemented. Regards Hall -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Christophe Barbé Software Engineer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lineo France - Lineo High Availability Group 42-46, rue Médéric - 92110 Clichy - France phone (33).1.41.40.02.12 - fax (33).1.41.40.02.01 http://www.lineo.com
balsa: orphaned?
what's up with balsa? there's a huge number of old bugs (year or two old) including the ne that makes it uninstallable (+2 month days): Grave functionality bugs - outstanding (A list of all such bugs used to be available). #98110: balsa: depends on libltdl0, which has been removed Package: balsa; Severity: grave; Reported by: Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 66 days old. anybody knows what's going on? (I am looking for a MUA that supports IMAP (and SSL)) TIA erik
Re: balsa: orphaned?
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 01:58:08AM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote: | (I am looking for a MUA that supports IMAP (and SSL)) fetchmail + mozilla (since you are already using mozilla) Mozilla does support IMAP but I don't know about SSL. -D
