Re: bo to hamm upgrade

1997-12-28 Thread Randy Edwards
Scott K. Ellis wrote:
 Neither.  If you remove libc5, you will break your system and have to
 reinstall completely.  I repeat, DO NOT FORCE THE REMOVAL OF LIBC5 UNDER
 ANY CIRCUMSTANCES.

   Well, although nearly fatal, I didn't have to do a complete
reinstall.  I did go ahead and remove libc5 and was surprised at how
many things it broke.  It broke things real good.  :-)  Since I did
have a spare partition on this machine I went ahead and used an old copy
of Debian 1.2 and installed the 6-disk base system on it, then booted
from that, mounted my normal root partition (after fsck'ing it, of
course), and copied over libc5 to my normal partition.  That allowed me
to boot from my normal root partition where I reinstalled the libc5*.deb
and thanked God for looking out for fools like me.

 Either downgrade to the earlier version of libc5 I list at the end of the
 howto, or upgrade both libc5 and libc6 from hamm on the same dpkg command 
 line.

   I wound up doing the downgrade and then installing libc6.  Worked
like a charm -- the new dpkg is happily downloading hamm files right
now.

   Thanks much for the info Scott...

-- 
 Regards, | Debian GNU/ __  o
 .|/ / _  _  _  _  _ __  __
 Randy|   / /__  / / / \// //_// \ \/ /
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])  |  // /_/ /_/\/ /___/  /_/\_\
  |  ...because lockups are for convicts...


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: bo to hamm upgrade

1997-12-28 Thread Will Lowe
On Sat, 27 Dec 1997, Randy Edwards wrote:

 reinstall.  I did go ahead and remove libc5 and was surprised at how
 many things it broke.  It broke things real good.  :-)  Since I did
Yup. :)

 have a spare partition on this machine I went ahead and used an old copy
 of Debian 1.2 and installed the 6-disk base system on it, then booted
I have my original copy of the Debian 1.2 rescue disk (the one I used
long ago to boot debian and install the first time),  and it's bailed me
out more times than I can count ... it is possible to
do most of these system repairs using just that disk,  because you can
boot and mount your filesystems with it,  then do repairs as long as you
can use ae instead of emacs. I recommend keeping a couple copies of this
disk around.

Will


--
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |
|   http://www.cis.udel.edu/~lowe/   |
--
|The problem with computers: |
||
|  rivendell[501] [~] love me   |
|  bash: love: command not found |
|  rivendell[502] [~] hug me|
|  bash: hug: command not found  |
--


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: bo to hamm upgrade

1997-12-28 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sat, Dec 27, 1997 at 09:30:56PM -0500, Randy Edwards wrote:
 Scott K. Ellis wrote:
  Neither.  If you remove libc5, you will break your system and have to
  reinstall completely.  I repeat, DO NOT FORCE THE REMOVAL OF LIBC5 UNDER
  ANY CIRCUMSTANCES.
 
Well, although nearly fatal, I didn't have to do a complete
 reinstall.  I did go ahead and remove libc5 and was surprised at how
 many things it broke.  It broke things real good.  :-)  Since I did

Err, yeah; we don't put those dependencies in for their good looks! :-)

Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP#EFA6B9D5
CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome.   http://hamish.home.ml.org


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


bo to hamm upgrade

1997-12-27 Thread Randy Edwards
   Does anyone have a set of instructions for hand upgrading a working bo
system to the present hamm?  I saw some such instructions posted a month or
so ago, but didn't have the foresight to save the message.  Any assistance
would be greatly appreciated; thanks in advance.

 Regards, | Debian GNU/ __  o
 .|/ / _  _  _  _  _ __  __
 Randy|   / /__  / / / \// //_// \ \/ /
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])  |  // /_/ /_/\/ /___/  /_/\_\
  |  ...because lockups are for convicts...



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: bo to hamm upgrade

1997-12-27 Thread hawk
Does anyone have a set of instructions for hand upgrading a working bo
 system to the present hamm?  I saw some such instructions posted a month or
 so ago, but didn't have the foresight to save the message.  Any assistance
 would be greatly appreciated; thanks in advance.

You can find them in the unstable tree of the ftp site with the installation 
instructions.

rick

-- 
These opinions will not be those of ISU until it pays my retainer.



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: bo to hamm upgrade

1997-12-27 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Sat, Dec 27, 1997 at 01:14:56PM +0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Does anyone have a set of instructions for hand upgrading a working bo
  system to the present hamm?  I saw some such instructions posted a month or
  so ago, but didn't have the foresight to save the message.  Any assistance
  would be greatly appreciated; thanks in advance.
 
 You can find them in the unstable tree of the ftp site with the installation 
 instructions.

Or online:

http://www.gate.net/~storm/FAQ/libc5-libc6-Mini-HOWTO.html

Have Fun!
Marcus
-- 
Rhubarb is no Egyptian god. Debian GNU/Linux
Marcus Brinkmann  http://www.debian.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/  PGP Key ID 36E7CD09


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: bo to hamm upgrade

1997-12-27 Thread Randy Edwards
Marcus Brinkmann wrote:

 http://www.gate.net/~storm/FAQ/libc5-libc6-Mini-HOWTO.html

   Thanks Marcus!  One quick question if you don't mind: When installing
libc6 in place of libc5, should I force the removal of the essential
libc5 package first or force the installation of libc6 in addition to
libc5?  I'm assuming it's the former, but want to make sure first. 
Thanks in advance.

-- 
 Regards, | Debian GNU/ __  o
 .|/ / _  _  _  _  _ __  __
 Randy|   / /__  / / / \// //_// \ \/ /
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])  |  // /_/ /_/\/ /___/  /_/\_\
  |  ...because lockups are for convicts...


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: bo to hamm upgrade

1997-12-27 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On Sat, 27 Dec 1997, Randy Edwards wrote:

 Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
 
  http://www.gate.net/~storm/FAQ/libc5-libc6-Mini-HOWTO.html
 
Thanks Marcus!  One quick question if you don't mind: When installing
 libc6 in place of libc5, should I force the removal of the essential
 libc5 package first or force the installation of libc6 in addition to
 libc5?  I'm assuming it's the former, but want to make sure first. 
 Thanks in advance.

Neither.  If you remove libc5, you will break your system and have to
reinstall completely.  I repeat, DO NOT FORCE THE REMOVAL OF LIBC5 UNDER
ANY CIRCUMSTANCES.  Either downgrade to the earlier version of libc5 I
list at the end of the howto, or upgrade both libc5 and libc6 from hamm on
the same dpkg command line.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .