Bounced mail etc.
Apologies to all those receiving bounced mail error messages from the mailer daemon at my company - I'm unsubbing now to stop this until the sysadmin can change the filtering rules. ~B ---Disclaimer--- Unless obviously public, this email is confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you received it in error please tell the sender and then delete it. We check emails from dyslexic.com and iansyst.co.uk, but you should virus check incoming emails. Emails do not always represent our official policy or a contract. Errors and omissions are excepted. iANSYST Ltd, Fen House, Fen Road, CAMBRIDGE, CB4 1UN. T +44(0)1223 420101; Fax +44(0) 1223 42 66 44; [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bounced mail mailing lists ???
My web hosting service lost the aliases file, and mail was bounced back to senders for user unknown. It is fixed now; but, I am unclear on mailing list response to this situation? Will the bounced messages be re-sent? Are they lost forever? What do you think? -- Best Regards, mds mds resource 877.596.8237 - Dare to fix things before they break . . . - Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . . -- pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bounced mail from debian-user list (?)
Hi, I just got a whole mess of bounced mail messages from concentric.net related to the Debian list. In fact, all of the messages I sent to the list were apparently delivered since I got copies of my message from the list. I assumed my messages got through fine since I got responses from the list. Has anyone else experiences this? How can I correct this? Here is an excerpt from one of the bounced e-mails: Received: from localhost ([207.155.189.44]) by localhost with esmtp id m0y8xoc-000iu6C (Debian Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #2); Sat, 28 Feb 1998 19:45:18 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost with esmtp (ident blunier using rfc1413) id m0y8xfj-000itEC (Debian Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #2); Sat, 28 Feb 1998 19:36:07 -0600 (CST) Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pop3.concentric.net by localhost (fetchmail-4.3.6 POP3) for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop); Sat, 28 Feb 1998 19:36:07 CST Received: from debian.novare.net (debian.novare.net [205.229.104.5]) by beasley.concentric.net (8.8.8/(97/11/17 5.13)) id MAA22779; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 12:15:29 -0500 (EST) [1-800-745-2747 The Concentric Network] The rest of the bounced messages have similar contents. Should I e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (the trouble address at the bottom of every posted message) about this? Thanks, -Ossama __ Ossama Othman [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- PGP Keys --- Public: http://astrosun.tn.cornell.edu/staff/othman/OO_PUBLIC.asc REVOKED: http://astrosun.tn.cornell.edu/staff/othman/OO_REVOKED.asc -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Re: Bounced mail from debian-user list (?)
Thanks for your posting!! I also just now received a bunch of 'returned mail messages' for messages that I have posted to the debian-users list and have already been sent to my mail account from debian-users. In my case the specific postings for which the 'returned' messages were sent were posted directly to an ISP using netscape mail. I have not made any changes to netscape for months so I suspect that there has been some change made at concentric.net and your posting furthers that suspicion. -- best, -bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] from a 1996 Micro$loth ad campaign: The less you know about computers the more you want Micro$oft! See! They do get some things right! -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Re: Routing of bounced mail
Robert D. Hilliard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What is the standard (if there is a standard) routing that MTAs use to route bounced mail? Do they use the FROM: field or the Return-Path: field? It should be the Return-Path: field (or rather, the MAIL FROM: SMTP command that was used to generate the Return-Path:) but it isn't always. If you've been using any mailing list for a while, you've probably seen bounced mail go to either the list itself or back to you, when it should go to the list manager (debian-user-request in this list's case). The MTA's doing this are broken, though. -- Carey Evans * [EMAIL PROTECTED] these are not inherent flaws in [NT] -- they don't happen by accident. They are the result of deliberate and well-thought-out efforts. - MS -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Routing of bounced mail
What is the standard (if there is a standard) routing that MTAs use to route bounced mail? Do they use the FROM: field or the Return-Path: field? Bob -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
bounced mail?
I'm sorry if my host bounced any email. I think I didn't get kicked off the list because of it... :) but if I did.. i'll know if I never get this message back. My ISP sucks.. I'm switching in a week or so. -- Daniel Stringfield mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.jax-inter.net/users/servo Send email for more information on the Jacksonville Linux Users Group! -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
