Re: clueless people on debian-user

1997-12-13 Thread smorrill
I'll put up with some of the spam, and as for misdirected mail, welll...
being a complete Linux newbie, I've probably submitted my share.  But
I've learned a lot from the folks on this list.  I'd sure hate to see it
go
--
 Steve Morrill


 Reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 PGP Pub key id: 0xF2459FCD
 Debian LINUX Where I really want to go today!



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: clueless people on debian-user

1997-12-13 Thread Thomas Lakofski
On 12 Dec 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I think having our lists on news benefits us, and we can tolerate the spam
 and the mis-directed mail. What do you think?

Ummm, I guess we could:

- shut down the news gateway, and restrict posts to debian-user to those
who are subscribed to it, and make subscription a little tricky
(confirmation via a reply that requires the user to jump through a small
hoop -- in effect an intelligence test, although one easy enough for small
children, pets, etc. to complete, but not the majority of AOL users... ;)

or, we could:

- live with it, and/or filter incoming messages appropriately with
procmail (filtering messages which match the expression (|) is
interestingly effective, I find).

I favor the second option, I think.  For those occasional stupid/misplaced
messages, the 'D' key works quite nicely.

TL


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: clueless people on debian-user

1997-12-13 Thread Michael Harnois
 bruce  writes:

 I think having our lists on news benefits us, and we can
 tolerate the spam and the mis-directed mail. What do you think?

Agreed.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: clueless people on debian-user

1997-12-13 Thread Ben Pfaff
   I think having our lists on news benefits us, and we can tolerate the spam
   and the mis-directed mail. What do you think?

I think that we need to make the newsgroups read-only.  Any
submissions to the list should be required to come via e-mail.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: clueless people on debian-user

1997-12-13 Thread Ben Pfaff
   Why do you want to do that?  

   On 13 Dec 1997, Ben Pfaff wrote:

   I think having our lists on news benefits us, and we can tolerate the 
spam
   and the mis-directed mail. What do you think?

I think that we need to make the newsgroups read-only.  Any
submissions to the list should be required to come via e-mail.

Aren't the problems with having the newsgroups that cluless people
send stupid messages and spam to the lists?  So if we just allow
people to *read* the lists on newsgroups, but require them to send
submissions to the e-mail address, then we've got the best of both
worlds.  


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: clueless people on debian-user

1997-12-13 Thread Oliver Elphick
Ben Pfaff wrote:
  Aren't the problems with having the newsgroups that cluless people
  send stupid messages and spam to the lists?  So if we just allow
  people to *read* the lists on newsgroups, but require them to send
  submissions to the e-mail address, then we've got the best of both
  worlds.  

I'm not sure if this is what you mean, but I think you want the newsgroups
to be moderated? (Presumably the clueless can still post direct to the
mailing list.)  Someone would have to filter the clueless postings out
before sending the rest on to the mailing list.

-- 
Oliver Elphick[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Isle of Wight  http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver

PGP key from public servers; key ID 32B8FAA1

Unsolicited email advertisements are not welcome; any person sending
such will be invoiced for telephone time used in downloading together
with a £25 administration charge.



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


clueless people on debian-user

1997-12-12 Thread bruce
 My students were messing around with my classroom computer, and now I 
 have stuff all over the place.  I can't get everything back in proper 
 order.  What do I do?

This is obviously a windows user. Because of postings like this,
and because of all the spam we are getting and all of the clueless
people who mail to our personal mailboxes, there has been a clamor
to shut down the news gateway and go to mailing-list-only distribution
of the Debian lists. To compound the problem the news gateway has
been stripping out the X-No-Archive header, and the operator is too busy
to fix it for now. Also, some web archives do not honor that header at all.

I think having our lists on news benefits us, and we can tolerate the spam
and the mis-directed mail. What do you think?

Bruce


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: clueless people on debian-user

1997-12-12 Thread G John Lapeyre
On 12 Dec 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  My students were messing around with my classroom computer, and now I 
  have stuff all over the place.  I can't get everything back in proper 
  order.  What do I do?
 
 This is obviously a windows user. Because of postings like this,

See my reply to the post as well !

 and because of all the spam we are getting and all of the clueless
 people who mail to our personal mailboxes, there has been a clamor
 to shut down the news gateway and go to mailing-list-only distribution
 of the Debian lists. To compound the problem the news gateway has
 been stripping out the X-No-Archive header, and the operator is too busy
 to fix it for now. Also, some web archives do not honor that header at all.
 
 I think having our lists on news benefits us, and we can tolerate the spam
 and the mis-directed mail. What do you think?
 
I don't see why people let a little spam get to them.  Its bad,
but its life.  About one out of 50 or 100 messages on debian-user is like
this.  Thats not much, and Im pretty fast with the 'D' key.  I think that
the benefits outweigh the costs.  I tend not to have an emotional reaction
to spam in my inbox, but again , for me its 50 to 1 or more legitimate
mail.
Question is how many debain users prefer to access the list via
usenet ?

G John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: clueless people on debian-user

1997-12-12 Thread Manos Papantoniou
personally I find the usenet more efficient since I don't have to
download the complete messages, just the headers

Manos

G John Lapeyre wrote:
 
 On 12 Dec 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   My students were messing around with my classroom computer, and now I
   have stuff all over the place.  I can't get everything back in proper
   order.  What do I do?
 
  This is obviously a windows user. Because of postings like this,
 
 See my reply to the post as well !
 
  and because of all the spam we are getting and all of the clueless
  people who mail to our personal mailboxes, there has been a clamor
  to shut down the news gateway and go to mailing-list-only distribution
  of the Debian lists. To compound the problem the news gateway has
  been stripping out the X-No-Archive header, and the operator is too busy
  to fix it for now. Also, some web archives do not honor that header at all.
 
  I think having our lists on news benefits us, and we can tolerate the spam
  and the mis-directed mail. What do you think?
 
 I don't see why people let a little spam get to them.  Its bad,
 but its life.  About one out of 50 or 100 messages on debian-user is like
 this.  Thats not much, and Im pretty fast with the 'D' key.  I think that
 the benefits outweigh the costs.  I tend not to have an emotional reaction
 to spam in my inbox, but again , for me its 50 to 1 or more legitimate
 mail.
 Question is how many debain users prefer to access the list via
 usenet ?
 
 G John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
 
 --
 TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
 Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: clueless people on debian-user

1997-12-12 Thread C.L. Daugaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I think having our lists on news benefits us, and we can tolerate the spam
 and the mis-directed mail. What do you think?
 

I agree.

-- 

C.L. Daugaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: clueless people on debian-user

1997-12-12 Thread Steve Kostecke
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (G John Lapeyre) writes:
   I don't see why people let a little spam get to them.  Its bad,
 but its life.  About one out of 50 or 100 messages on debian-user is like
It's not that difficult to set up procmail to catch most of the spam.
And we do have spamdb in hamm.

   Question is how many debain users prefer to access the list via
 usenet ?
I prefer to receive the lists by mail.

off-topic

I've recently started piping my incoming debian-user  debian-devel
messages through a non.mime sed filter before piping them to mail2news.
Based on the tests I've run on messages in my /var/spool/news/debian/*
directories this filter deletes all of the MIME cruft and appears to
leave the clear text intact.

You'll also note the I'm striping any existing Distribution: header.
I mark all incoming messages Distribution: local when they are gatewayed
to news.  This is so that they won't get reposted to the group.
Recently I found that some mailing list messages arrive with an
existing Distribution: header. Mail2news won't overwrite an existing
header.  Maybe I ought to report this as a bug...

Here's the filter
:
/^Distribution:/d
/=_NextPart_/,/=_NextPart_/d
/^Content-Type:.*$/d
/^Content-Transfer.*$/d
/charset=iso\-8859\-1/d
s/=$//
s/=20$//

/off-topic
-- 
   _ _  
Steve Kostecke| (_)_ __  _   ___  __
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| | | '_ \| | | \ \/ /
http://kostecke.home.ml.org   | | | | | | |_| |   
  |_|_|_| |_|\__,_/_/\_\


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: clueless people on debian-user

1997-12-12 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Fri, 12 Dec 1997, C.L. Daugaard wrote:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  I think having our lists on news benefits us, and we can tolerate the spam
  and the mis-directed mail. What do you think?
  
 
 I agree.

I agree too.

...RickM...



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .