Re: debian-cd baking process
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 06:12:47PM +0100, Kevin Price wrote: >Dear Steve: > >Am 18.01.24 um 00:37 schrieb Steve McIntyre: >> Kevin Price wrote: >>> I'm not quite sure where to address this to, > >> Argh, that's my code in the debian-cd package. "reportbug debian-cd" >> should do the right thing... > >Thank you for your help, I should have known. So I've now filed >https://bugs.debian.org/1063858 . Please accept my apology for being >slow in doing that. No worries, thanks for prodding. :-) -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com 'There is some grim amusement in watching Pence try to run the typical "politician in the middle of a natural disaster" playbook, however incompetently, while Trump scribbles all over it in crayon and eats some of the pages.' -- Russ Allbery
Re: debian-cd baking process
Dear Steve: Am 18.01.24 um 00:37 schrieb Steve McIntyre: > Kevin Price wrote: >> I'm not quite sure where to address this to, > Argh, that's my code in the debian-cd package. "reportbug debian-cd" > should do the right thing... Thank you for your help, I should have known. So I've now filed https://bugs.debian.org/1063858 . Please accept my apology for being slow in doing that. Cheers -- Kevin Price
Re: debian-cd baking process
Hi Kevin! Kevin Price wrote: > >I'm not quite sure where to address this to, but I'm certain this is a >bug: If you download debian installer media, for instance >debian-12.4.0-amd64-DLBD-2.iso, they prominenty include the files >"README.txt" and "README.html". Those presumably somehow auto-generated >README files say, in the case of former example: > >"this disc is number 2 of a set of 1 discs" > >Which is obviously false. > >Could anyone please help me find where to file this bug to? Any ideas >much appreciated. Maybe there's a bug already that I didn't find. Argh, that's my code in the debian-cd package. "reportbug debian-cd" should do the right thing... -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com Can't keep my eyes from the circling sky, Tongue-tied & twisted, Just an earth-bound misfit, I...
Re: debian-cd baking process
On 17 Jan 2024 18:00 +0100, from k...@osnanet.de (Kevin Price): > Could anyone please help me find where to file this bug to? Any ideas > much appreciated. Maybe there's a bug already that I didn't find. The canonical starting point is https://bugs.debian.org Notably for this situation, near the bottom of that page is a link to a list of pseudo-packages, which in turn includes "cdimage.debian.org — CD Image issues" which looks right for this. So you would file a bug with a Package: cdimage.debian.org The corresponding list of currently outstanding bugs is viewable through https://bugs.debian.org/cdimage.debian.org Also, while obviously it's far, far better to take care to file a bug against the correct package, I would go out on a limb here and say that it's not a disaster if, _despite your best efforts_, it ends up being filed against the wrong package or pseudo-package. Bugs _can_ be reassigned to different packages if they are filed against the wrong package by mistake. The above is NOT meant to imply endorsement of sloppy bug filing; _do_ your best to find the correct package to report the bug against, but _don't_ lose sleep over a slim chance that you might end up reporting it against the wrong package. Someone will almost certainly fix it if you get it wrong; it might just take longer to get the bug fixed, especially for a low-priority bug like I would at first glance consider the one you're talking about in this thread. -- Michael Kjörling https://michael.kjorling.se “Remember when, on the Internet, nobody cared that you were a dog?”
debian-cd baking process
Hi all! I'm not quite sure where to address this to, but I'm certain this is a bug: If you download debian installer media, for instance debian-12.4.0-amd64-DLBD-2.iso, they prominenty include the files "README.txt" and "README.html". Those presumably somehow auto-generated README files say, in the case of former example: "this disc is number 2 of a set of 1 discs" Which is obviously false. Could anyone please help me find where to file this bug to? Any ideas much appreciated. Maybe there's a bug already that I didn't find. -- Kevin Price