Re: directfb w ATI Radeon

2003-09-15 Thread Mental Patient
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 00:31:55 -0400, 
Mental Patient [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:


Anyone using this setup? I recently switched my Geforce3 for a Radeon.
I have glx/X11 stuff working fine, but was wondering about getting 
directfb working. I've tried passing vga=791 at the grub prompt, as
well 


..at the grub prompt, hit c then tab twice.  Try 'vbe-detect(?)' 
to see what video modes it can do.


Turns out it was a kernel config error. Recompiled with frame buffer 
console enabled, it goes.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: directfb w ATI Radeon

2003-09-15 Thread tb . nospam
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 08:39:01AM -0400, Mental Patient wrote:
 Arnt Karlsen wrote:
 On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 00:31:55 -0400, 
 Mental Patient [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
 
 Anyone using this setup? I recently switched my Geforce3 for a Radeon.
 I have glx/X11 stuff working fine, but was wondering about getting 
 directfb working. I've tried passing vga=791 at the grub prompt, as
 well 
 
 
 ..at the grub prompt, hit c then tab twice.  Try 'vbe-detect(?)' 
 to see what video modes it can do.
 
 
 
 Turns out it was a kernel config error. Recompiled with frame buffer 
 console enabled, it goes.

Is the framebuffer accelerated with a Radeon [9700]?  I got it to work
but it was very slow compared to not using it.  This would make things
that spew lots of text (like compiles) take much longer, so even though
it was beautiful I preferred not to use it.   Did I misconfigure it?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: directfb w ATI Radeon

2003-09-15 Thread Mental Patient
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 08:39:01AM -0400, Mental Patient wrote:
Turns out it was a kernel config error. Recompiled with frame buffer 
console enabled, it goes.


Is the framebuffer accelerated with a Radeon [9700]?  I got it to work
but it was very slow compared to not using it.  This would make things
that spew lots of text (like compiles) take much longer, so even though
it was beautiful I preferred not to use it.   Did I misconfigure it?

Not sure, I'm running 2.6.0-test5. I haven't really had time to make any 
kind of judgement. I got the console to come up in frame buffer mode, 
logged in and thats about it. I'm using a similar card as yours. The 
console didn't seem overy slow, but plain text mode is probably still 
faster.

As far as directfb goes, I saw on the web site that initial radeon 
acceleration support is working, however I still have a good bit of 
reading to do before I get gtk+ apps,ect working on the console.



--

Mental ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

The Torah...  The Gospels...  The Koran...
Each claimed as the infallible word of GOD.
Misquoted, misinterpreted, misunderstood, and misapplied.
Maybe that's why he doesn't do any more interviews. - sinfest.net
CARPE NOCTEM, QUAM MINIMUM CREDULA POSTERO.

GPG public key: http://www.neverlight.com/pas/Mental.asc



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: directfb w ATI Radeon

2003-09-15 Thread tb . nospam
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 02:11:03PM -0400, Mental Patient wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 08:39:01AM -0400, Mental Patient wrote:
 
 Is the framebuffer accelerated with a Radeon [9700]?  I got it to work
 but it was very slow compared to not using it.  This would make things
 that spew lots of text (like compiles) take much longer, so even though
 it was beautiful I preferred not to use it.   Did I misconfigure it?
 
 
 
 Not sure, I'm running 2.6.0-test5. I haven't really had time to make any 
 kind of judgement. I got the console to come up in frame buffer mode, 
 logged in and thats about it. I'm using a similar card as yours. The 
 console didn't seem overy slow, but plain text mode is probably still 
 faster.
 
 As far as directfb goes, I saw on the web site that initial radeon 
 acceleration support is working, however I still have a good bit of 
 reading to do before I get gtk+ apps,ect working on the console.
 

The test is to run
% yes | nl
for say 30 seconds.  VGA text mode was like 100 times faster for me.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: directfb w ATI Radeon

2003-09-15 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 15:18:54 -0700, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 The test is to run
 % yes | nl
 for say 30 seconds.  VGA text mode was like 100 times faster for me.

.._sweet_.  Try 'time yes |nl '.  ;-)   
  5608  y
  5609  y
  561

real0m10.684s
user0m0.120s
sys 0m0.030s
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$

..more benchmarks?

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: directfb w ATI Radeon

2003-09-15 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 01:31:17AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
 On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 15:18:54 -0700, 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
  The test is to run
  % yes | nl
  for say 30 seconds.  VGA text mode was like 100 times faster for me.
 
 .._sweet_.  Try 'time yes |nl '.  ;-)   
   5608  y
   5609  y
   561
 
 real0m10.684s
 user0m0.120s
 sys 0m0.030s
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
 
 ..more benchmarks?

Some of this is down to the terminal emulator as well. xterm got to
18036 in 30 seconds, informally timed, while pterm got to 849123. (pterm
has always had some other resource usage issues, mind you.)

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: directfb w ATI Radeon

2003-09-14 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 00:31:55 -0400, 
Mental Patient [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Anyone using this setup? I recently switched my Geforce3 for a Radeon.
 I have glx/X11 stuff working fine, but was wondering about getting 
 directfb working. I've tried passing vga=791 at the grub prompt, as
 well 

..at the grub prompt, hit c then tab twice.  Try 'vbe-detect(?)' 
to see what video modes it can do.


-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



directfb w ATI Radeon

2003-09-13 Thread Mental Patient
Anyone using this setup? I recently switched my Geforce3 for a Radeon. I 
have glx/X11 stuff working fine, but was wondering about getting 
directfb working. I've tried passing vga=791 at the grub prompt, as well 
as video=radeonfb, but the console stays black until X starts (gdm).

Anyone have this stuff working?



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]