gdk-imlib1 version

2000-08-23 Thread Hugo van der Merwe 
Hi,

For the past week at least, I have kept a couple of packages on hold (I
run unstable), as they depend on gdk-imlib1 (= 1.9.8.1), while on my
mirror the version of gdk-imlib1 is 1.9.8-4. I was tempted to submit a bug
report, but realised it might be only my mirror, and that someone else
will quickly submit a report if this is really so.

However, this has still not been fixed, and I checked a second South
African (that's where I live) mirror, which also only has 1.9.8-4
available. Then I checked ftp.debian.org, which also has version 1.9.8-4.
I suppose I should submit bug reports against packages that depend on
gdk-imlib1 (= 1.9.8.1)? This strikes me as funny though, because there
have been updates to some of these packages, without this being fixed. I
cannot believe something like this can slip through the cracks so easily,
which is why I'm so hesitant to submit a bug report.

Thanks,
Hugo van der Merwe

Re: gdk-imlib1 version

2000-08-23 Thread Alessandro Ghigi 

Hi

I have the same problem, and yesterday wrote about this, but nobody
answered. I am using the mirror ftp.ca.debia.org, but it is not a problem
of the ftp site, I think.

Alessandro

On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:

 Hi,
 
 For the past week at least, I have kept a couple of packages on hold (I
 run unstable), as they depend on gdk-imlib1 (= 1.9.8.1), while on my
 mirror the version of gdk-imlib1 is 1.9.8-4. I was tempted to submit a bug
 report, but realised it might be only my mirror, and that someone else
 will quickly submit a report if this is really so.
 
 However, this has still not been fixed, and I checked a second South
 African (that's where I live) mirror, which also only has 1.9.8-4
 available. Then I checked ftp.debian.org, which also has version 1.9.8-4.
 I suppose I should submit bug reports against packages that depend on
 gdk-imlib1 (= 1.9.8.1)? This strikes me as funny though, because there
 have been updates to some of these packages, without this being fixed. I
 cannot believe something like this can slip through the cracks so easily,
 which is why I'm so hesitant to submit a bug report.
 
 Thanks,
 Hugo van der Merwe
 
 
 -- 
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null

Re: gdk-imlib1 version

2000-08-23 Thread Kent Pirkle 
On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 11:49:57PM +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
 For the past week at least, I have kept a couple of packages on hold (I
 run unstable), as they depend on gdk-imlib1 (= 1.9.8.1), while on my
 mirror the version of gdk-imlib1 is 1.9.8-4. I was tempted to submit a bug
 report, but realised it might be only my mirror, and that someone else
 will quickly submit a report if this is really so.

I too have noticed this, and I am using US mirrors. I just upgraded from
potato - woody this past weekend, if that has anything to do with it. 

Kent

Re: gdk-imlib1 version

2000-08-23 Thread Kent Pirkle 
I just filed a bug report for balsa. Someone else had already filed a
report for gedit and gdk-imlib1.