Re: gedit ugly under xfce
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 19:39:41 + (UTC) Juan R. de Silva juan.r.d.si...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 11:26:38 -0400, Steve Litt wrote: On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 21:43:00 + (UTC) Juan R. de Silva juan.r.d.si...@gmail.com wrote: BTW, about bupsky script you shared with me... It's very nice while working with files in console, like using vim, or nano, or anything like this. I do most of my file editing work in GUI editors. So, in this case it's not very helpfull. Right? Or I'm missing something? Just keep a terminal, cd'd to the directory of your project, on a workspace (usually numbered 1 to 8). Every time you hit a milestone, deliverable, or every hour, just go to that workspace, type the word bupsky, and you're done. Elapsed time, 20 seconds. Time saved if something goes wrong: hours. By the way, most of my editing is done in gvim, so I'm the same as you. Yesterday I installed gvim too. It was quite a logical choice, I guess. 20 secs vs. hours definitely win. :-) Thanks again. :-) Yeah, but with gvim as well as whatever editor you were using before, you still need to use bupsky or something like it, every time you hit a milestone or once per hour, whichever is less. Personally, I love gvim. If you're a touch typist and you feel the need for speed, Vim and gvim are where it's at. SteveT Steve Litt* http://www.troubleshooters.com/ Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140718105258.7ef9f...@mydesq2.domain.cxm
Re: gedit ugly under xfce
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 21:43:00 + (UTC) Juan R. de Silva juan.r.d.si...@gmail.com wrote: BTW, about bupsky script you shared with me... It's very nice while working with files in console, like using vim, or nano, or anything like this. I do most of my file editing work in GUI editors. So, in this case it's not very helpfull. Right? Or I'm missing something? Just keep a terminal, cd'd to the directory of your project, on a workspace (usually numbered 1 to 8). Every time you hit a milestone, deliverable, or every hour, just go to that workspace, type the word bupsky, and you're done. Elapsed time, 20 seconds. Time saved if something goes wrong: hours. By the way, most of my editing is done in gvim, so I'm the same as you. Steve Steve Litt* http://www.troubleshooters.com/ Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140717112638.550e1...@mydesq2.domain.cxm
Re: gedit ugly under xfce
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 11:26:38 -0400, Steve Litt wrote: On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 21:43:00 + (UTC) Juan R. de Silva juan.r.d.si...@gmail.com wrote: BTW, about bupsky script you shared with me... It's very nice while working with files in console, like using vim, or nano, or anything like this. I do most of my file editing work in GUI editors. So, in this case it's not very helpfull. Right? Or I'm missing something? Just keep a terminal, cd'd to the directory of your project, on a workspace (usually numbered 1 to 8). Every time you hit a milestone, deliverable, or every hour, just go to that workspace, type the word bupsky, and you're done. Elapsed time, 20 seconds. Time saved if something goes wrong: hours. By the way, most of my editing is done in gvim, so I'm the same as you. Yesterday I installed gvim too. It was quite a logical choice, I guess. 20 secs vs. hours definitely win. :-) Thanks again. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/lq98pt$e8h$1...@ger.gmane.org
Re: gedit ugly under xfce
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 20:29:56 -0400, Steve Litt wrote: Turns out it didn't eat it, it just made characters invisible. Here's the start of the thread: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-users/2014-July/007303.html I confirm this. Here's my post about it on that thread: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-users/2014-July/007320.html Though I spent quit a bit of time to figure it out. Well, plus a bit of frustration thinking the file was lost. But... At the end there was a Happy End. :-) Nevertheless, I did not neither Mousepad nor Leafpad and with some help found a very good substitution for both - Pluma a default MATE text editor, a fork from venerable GNOME2 gedit. Looks excellent in XFCE. Another one I installed and I like it is Geany. But this one is for more serious work. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/lq6nur$ejb$2...@ger.gmane.org
Re: gedit ugly under xfce
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 20:39:56 + (UTC) Juan R. de Silva juan.r.d.si...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 20:29:56 -0400, Steve Litt wrote: Turns out it didn't eat it, it just made characters invisible. Here's the start of the thread: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-users/2014-July/007303.html I confirm this. Here's my post about it on that thread: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-users/2014-July/007320.html Though I spent quit a bit of time to figure it out. Well, plus a bit of frustration thinking the file was lost. But... At the end there was a Happy End. :-) Nevertheless, I did not neither Mousepad nor Leafpad and with some help found a very good substitution for both - Pluma a default MATE text editor, a fork from venerable GNOME2 gedit. Looks excellent in XFCE. Another one I installed and I like it is Geany. But this one is for more serious work. :-) Juan, a happy ending *this time*. Can I safely assume that from now on you'll be backing up your work, right? :-) SteveT Steve Litt* http://www.troubleshooters.com/ Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140716171536.3e1a3...@mydesq2.domain.cxm
Re: gedit ugly under xfce
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 17:15:36 -0400, Steve Litt wrote: On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 20:39:56 + (UTC) Juan R. de Silva juan.r.d.si...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 20:29:56 -0400, Steve Litt wrote: Turns out it didn't eat it, it just made characters invisible. Here's the start of the thread: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-users/2014-July/007303.html I confirm this. Here's my post about it on that thread: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-users/2014-July/007320.html Though I spent quit a bit of time to figure it out. Well, plus a bit of frustration thinking the file was lost. But... At the end there was a Happy End. :-) Nevertheless, I did not neither Mousepad nor Leafpad and with some help found a very good substitution for both - Pluma a default MATE text editor, a fork from venerable GNOME2 gedit. Looks excellent in XFCE. Another one I installed and I like it is Geany. But this one is for more serious work. :-) Juan, a happy ending *this time*. Can I safely assume that from now on you'll be backing up your work, right? :-) SteveT Steve Litt* http://www.troubleshooters.com/ Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance It's a difficult question?.. :-) Well, I mean I always do regular backups. Up to date I was making them daily, weekly, and biweekly. I use rsync based script to make snapshot-style backups. As it appears from my last experience daily is not enough. Should I make them hourly, half- hourly?.. May I leave the last sentence endlessly open? :-) All we can do is trying to minimize the loss. However some kind of loss is unavoidable if an app misbehaves so badly as it happened in my case. BTW, about bupsky script you shared with me... It's very nice while working with files in console, like using vim, or nano, or anything like this. I do most of my file editing work in GUI editors. So, in this case it's not very helpfull. Right? Or I'm missing something? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/lq6rl3$d38$1...@ger.gmane.org
gedit ugly under xfce
sid 64bits XFCE gedit == Hi list, I'm using When I launch gedit, it just have ugly upper and lower gray bars (with controls information), but no XFCE decoration, especially the close/minimize buttons (and no upper bar from the theme). grdestop has XFCE decoration. Is it normal or do I miss some pkg(s)|setup? -- Never pay a compliment as if expecting a receipt. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: gedit ugly under xfce
On 07/15/2014 01:46 PM, B wrote: sid 64bits XFCE gedit == Hi list, I'm using When I launch gedit, it just have ugly upper and lower gray bars (with controls information), but no XFCE decoration, especially the close/minimize buttons (and no upper bar from the theme). grdestop has XFCE decoration. Is it normal or do I miss some pkg(s)|setup? I suffer the same thing with GThumb - so I don't think you're missing anything. I was told sometime ago on this list it's the wave of the future . I believe it's connected to GTK 3 somehow. -- 1984 was not meant as a blueprint for democratic governments. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53c572ea.9080...@videotron.ca
Re: gedit ugly under xfce
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 14:28:58 -0400 Frank McCormick debianl...@videotron.ca wrote: PLS don't Cc: me, I'm subscribed to the ML. -- Confucious say: man and mouse the same, both end up in pussy. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: gedit ugly under xfce
Hi. On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 07:46:07PM +0200, B wrote: When I launch gedit, it just have ugly upper and lower gray bars (with controls information), but no XFCE decoration, especially the close/minimize buttons (and no upper bar from the theme). grdestop has XFCE decoration. Is it normal or do I miss some pkg(s)|setup? This is … an expected behaviour from any GTK+3 application launched outside of GNOME. Googling 'GTK3 client-side decorations' will provide you with all the gory details. Upstream sees this misfeature as a best thing since buttered bread was invented [1]. Users thoughts on the matter, are … well, let's sum it up as 'needs some work' - [2]. Reco [1] http://blogs.gnome.org/mclasen/2014/01/13/client-side-decorations-continued/ [2] http://redmine.audacious-media-player.org/boards/1/topics/1135 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140715183410.GA8220@x101h
Re: gedit ugly under xfce
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 22:34:18 +0400 Reco recovery...@gmail.com wrote: This is … an expected behaviour from any GTK+3 application launched outside of GNOME. Googling 'GTK3 client-side decorations' will provide you with all the gory details. That was my conclusion from Franck post (and also checked on a 32bits machine: ze same) Upstream sees this misfeature as a best thing since buttered bread was invented [1]. Users thoughts on the matter, are … well, let's sum it up as 'needs some work' - [2]. I think I could suggest another use of the butter for those creeps… Too bad, I loved gedit; any suggestion about quite the same editor w/o uglyness? -- foxy do you trust in prophetic dreams? albou yes, but not all the time. foxy this night, I dreamt we had sex together! albou uhhh, as I told you: not all the time… signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: gedit ugly under xfce
Geany works quite nice or there is always gvim. On 07/15/2014 01:47 PM, B wrote: On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 22:34:18 +0400 Reco recovery...@gmail.com wrote: This is … an expected behaviour from any GTK+3 application launched outside of GNOME. Googling 'GTK3 client-side decorations' will provide you with all the gory details. That was my conclusion from Franck post (and also checked on a 32bits machine: ze same) Upstream sees this misfeature as a best thing since buttered bread was invented [1]. Users thoughts on the matter, are … well, let's sum it up as 'needs some work' - [2]. I think I could suggest another use of the butter for those creeps… Too bad, I loved gedit; any suggestion about quite the same editor w/o uglyness? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53c577a5.4040...@lostsonsvault.org
Re: gedit ugly under xfce
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:49:09 -0500 lostson lost...@lostsonsvault.org wrote: Geany works quite nice or there is always gvim. No bad at all, thanks. -- TooTo: eg: if you put the dog in the microwave, you'll void warranty Manny: For the dog or for the microwave? signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: gedit ugly under xfce
On 16/07/2014, Reco recovery...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 07:46:07PM +0200, B wrote: When I launch gedit, it just have ugly upper and lower gray bars (with controls information), but no XFCE decoration, especially the close/minimize buttons (and no upper bar from the theme). grdestop has XFCE decoration. Is it normal or do I miss some pkg(s)|setup? This is … an expected behaviour from any GTK+3 application launched outside of GNOME. Googling 'GTK3 client-side decorations' will provide you with all the gory details. Upstream sees this misfeature as a best thing since buttered bread was invented [1]. Users thoughts on the matter, are … well, let's sum it up as 'needs some work' - [2]. Reco [1] http://blogs.gnome.org/mclasen/2014/01/13/client-side-decorations-continued/ [2] http://redmine.audacious-media-player.org/boards/1/topics/1135 It all sounds like even more encouragement to stick with Debian 6, and GNOME2. Perhaps, that was the objective... -- Bret Busby Armadale West Australia .. So once you do know what the question actually is, you'll know what the answer means. - Deep Thought, Chapter 28 of Book 1 of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: A Trilogy In Four Parts, written by Douglas Adams, published by Pan Books, 1992 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CACX6j8NPB2J4jr81YRAUus9SqoB2Cc5qEOOKO9H=wv5qx_g...@mail.gmail.com
Re: gedit ugly under xfce
Le 15/07/2014 21:36, Bret Busby a écrit : On 16/07/2014, Reco recovery...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 07:46:07PM +0200, B wrote: When I launch gedit, it just have ugly upper and lower gray bars (with controls information), but no XFCE decoration, especially the close/minimize buttons (and no upper bar from the theme). grdestop has XFCE decoration. Is it normal or do I miss some pkg(s)|setup? This is … an expected behaviour from any GTK+3 application launched outside of GNOME. Googling 'GTK3 client-side decorations' will provide you with all the gory details. Upstream sees this misfeature as a best thing since buttered bread was invented [1]. Users thoughts on the matter, are … well, let's sum it up as 'needs some work' - [2]. Reco [1] http://blogs.gnome.org/mclasen/2014/01/13/client-side-decorations-continued/ [2] http://redmine.audacious-media-player.org/boards/1/topics/1135 It all sounds like even more encouragement to stick with Debian 6, and GNOME2. Perhaps, that was the objective... I would say to use something else than gnome There are several alternatives. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53c5831c.60...@rail.eu.org
Re: gedit ugly under xfce
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 2:47 PM, B lazyvi...@gmx.com wrote: On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 22:34:18 +0400 Reco recovery...@gmail.com wrote: This is … an expected behaviour from any GTK+3 application launched outside of GNOME. Googling 'GTK3 client-side decorations' will provide you with all the gory details. That was my conclusion from Franck post (and also checked on a 32bits machine: ze same) Upstream sees this misfeature as a best thing since buttered bread was invented [1]. Users thoughts on the matter, are … well, let's sum it up as 'needs some work' - [2]. I think I could suggest another use of the butter for those creeps… Too bad, I loved gedit; any suggestion about quite the same editor w/o uglyness? Doesn't Mate have a gedit fork? If you're not averse to rebuilding gedit, Ubuntu might have a patch that you could cherry-pick and apply. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=sxnwuosb78heqc1hl-7g-mdqolfvj+vjt0yxnzjqed...@mail.gmail.com
Re: gedit ugly under xfce
On Tue, 7/15/14, B lazyvi...@gmx.com wrote: Subject: Re: gedit ugly under xfce To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Tuesday, July 15, 2014, 1:47 PM Too bad, I loved gedit; any suggestion about quite the same editor w/o uglyness? With my wheezy xfce, I use mate-text-editor (pluma) from the mate project which is a port of the old GTK2 gedit . Solves the ugliness problem and is oh so familiar . . . Copying to you Buzz, because my posts from yahoo do not always get through. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1405454051.7039.yahoomailba...@web163402.mail.gq1.yahoo.com
Re: gedit ugly under xfce
On 16/07/2014, Erwan David er...@rail.eu.org wrote: Le 15/07/2014 21:36, Bret Busby a écrit : On 16/07/2014, Reco recovery...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 07:46:07PM +0200, B wrote: When I launch gedit, it just have ugly upper and lower gray bars (with controls information), but no XFCE decoration, especially the close/minimize buttons (and no upper bar from the theme). grdestop has XFCE decoration. Is it normal or do I miss some pkg(s)|setup? This is … an expected behaviour from any GTK+3 application launched outside of GNOME. Googling 'GTK3 client-side decorations' will provide you with all the gory details. Upstream sees this misfeature as a best thing since buttered bread was invented [1]. Users thoughts on the matter, are … well, let's sum it up as 'needs some work' - [2]. Reco [1] http://blogs.gnome.org/mclasen/2014/01/13/client-side-decorations-continued/ [2] http://redmine.audacious-media-player.org/boards/1/topics/1135 It all sounds like even more encouragement to stick with Debian 6, and GNOME2. Perhaps, that was the objective... I would say to use something else than gnome There are several alternatives. I have tried xfce, on Debian 7.5, and, do not like it. It appears to not have the fiunctionality for modifying the desktop layout as shown in the version of xfce for PC-BSD 210.0.2 - see http://wiki.pcbsd.org/index.php/XFCE4/10.0 , where provision is provided, for the Migrate old config option, which was greyed out, in the Debian 7.5 implementation of xfce. I could not (yet) get a workable LIVE disc of lxde on Debian 7.5 i386, to examine on my old Celeron laptop (HP/Compaq NX5000), so I am waiting for Debian 7.6 LIVE iso's to be available. I am not sure whether I can download and install LXDE on my Debian 7.5 amd64 system that already has XFCE installed; my understanding is that, with PC-BSD 10.0.x, a person can have multiple desktop environments installed, and, select one of them, to use, when logging in as a user, but, I do not know whether that applies in Debian Linux. -- Bret Busby Armadale West Australia .. So once you do know what the question actually is, you'll know what the answer means. - Deep Thought, Chapter 28 of Book 1 of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: A Trilogy In Four Parts, written by Douglas Adams, published by Pan Books, 1992 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CACX6j8MD-oA+hWFr-+7MvR__HihPxCfEvgjUvOk0K6PwbPC=5...@mail.gmail.com
Re: gedit ugly under xfce
On 16/07/2014, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 2:47 PM, B lazyvi...@gmx.com wrote: On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 22:34:18 +0400 Reco recovery...@gmail.com wrote: This is … an expected behaviour from any GTK+3 application launched outside of GNOME. Googling 'GTK3 client-side decorations' will provide you with all the gory details. That was my conclusion from Franck post (and also checked on a 32bits machine: ze same) Upstream sees this misfeature as a best thing since buttered bread was invented [1]. Users thoughts on the matter, are … well, let's sum it up as 'needs some work' - [2]. I think I could suggest another use of the butter for those creeps… Too bad, I loved gedit; any suggestion about quite the same editor w/o uglyness? Doesn't Mate have a gedit fork? At http://mate-desktop.org/ is Pluma Pluma is a text editor which supports most standard editor features. It also extends this basic functionality with other features not usually found in simple text editors. Pluma is a graphical application which supports editing multiple text files in one window (known sometimes as tabs or MDI). Pluma fully supports international text through its use of the Unicode UTF-8 encoding in edited files. Its core feature set includes syntax highlighting of source code, auto indentation, and printing support (with print preview). Pluma is a fork of Gedit. My understanding of a problem with the Mate desktop environment, is that appliactions have Spanish names, rather than English (or, kind of English, insofar as gedit is kind of English) names, like Caja, Atril, Engrampa, etc. -- Bret Busby Armadale West Australia .. So once you do know what the question actually is, you'll know what the answer means. - Deep Thought, Chapter 28 of Book 1 of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: A Trilogy In Four Parts, written by Douglas Adams, published by Pan Books, 1992 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cacx6j8nrsww+wqkzwx+ethcu6db5v3bkx5q+kgkftgy_9e-...@mail.gmail.com
Re: gedit ugly under xfce
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 22:34:18 +0400 Reco recovery...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 07:46:07PM +0200, B wrote: When I launch gedit, it just have ugly upper and lower gray bars (with controls information), but no XFCE decoration, especially the close/minimize buttons (and no upper bar from the theme). grdestop has XFCE decoration. Is it normal or do I miss some pkg(s)|setup? This is … an expected behaviour from any GTK+3 application launched outside of GNOME. Googling 'GTK3 client-side decorations' will provide you with all the gory details. There are so many great window manager/desktop environments (WM/DE). I used Xfce for years, love it, but yeah, it has a few deficiencies. Start by trying LXDE. I think it's better than Xfce in every respect except difficulty with multiple panels, and the slow mouse. Openbox is great if you don't need a panel. dwm and I3 are wonderful if you like slim tiled interfaces. If pretty is what you want, why not use Gnome3? Yeah, it's a whole different kind of animal, but I've seen it used by a guy who understood how to use it, and it can be very productive and very pretty. You know, so many people believe that the distro and WM/DE are a package deal, which is why everyone fled Ubuntu after Unity. There are zillions of outstanding WM/DEs to pick from, no matter what distro you choose. SteveT Steve Litt* http://www.troubleshooters.com/ Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140715163414.77b28...@mydesq2.domain.cxm
Re: gedit ugly under xfce
On 15/07/14 21:03, Bret Busby wrote: Pluma Pluma is a text editor which supports most standard editor features. What's wrong with xfce mousepad? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/blu436-smtp8961665f758b145f92ea25d0...@phx.gbl
Re: gedit ugly under xfce
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 22:00:34 +0100 José Silva jsantossi...@hotmail.com wrote: On 15/07/14 21:03, Bret Busby wrote: Pluma Pluma is a text editor which supports most standard editor features. What's wrong with xfce mousepad? Just the other day it ate someones whole file. I think that was reported on this mailing list. SteveT Steve Litt* http://www.troubleshooters.com/ Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140715181114.40a91...@mydesq2.domain.cxm
Re: gedit ugly under xfce
On 15/07/14 23:11, Steve Litt wrote: On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 22:00:34 +0100 José Silva jsantossi...@hotmail.com wrote: On 15/07/14 21:03, Bret Busby wrote: Pluma Pluma is a text editor which supports most standard editor features. What's wrong with xfce mousepad? Just the other day it ate someones whole file. I think that was reported on this mailing list. The version I have installed for several years never ate anything, I guess I feed it enough :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/blu436-smtp21b3afa4ed9f6dcdc61c68d0...@phx.gbl
Re: gedit ugly under xfce
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 00:38:14 +0100 José Silva jsantossi...@hotmail.com wrote: On 15/07/14 23:11, Steve Litt wrote: On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 22:00:34 +0100 José Silva jsantossi...@hotmail.com wrote: On 15/07/14 21:03, Bret Busby wrote: Pluma Pluma is a text editor which supports most standard editor features. What's wrong with xfce mousepad? Just the other day it ate someones whole file. I think that was reported on this mailing list. The version I have installed for several years never ate anything, I guess I feed it enough :) Turns out it didn't eat it, it just made characters invisible. Here's the start of the thread: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-users/2014-July/007303.html SteveT Steve Litt* http://www.troubleshooters.com/ Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140715202956.29f5f...@mydesq2.domain.cxm
