Re: Problems with gv after upgrade
Charles Curley writes: > On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 16:40:53 + > Rodolfo Medina wrote: > >> My PS file is regularly read by evince, simply with >> >> $ evince file.ps >> >> Instead, with gv, as I always did before: >> >> $ gv file.ps >> >> the application starts but the file won't open > > Not enough. Show us *exactly* what you typed and the results. > Paths, if any, and all. Everything. Start with the command prompt, and > copy and paste to the next command prompt. > > E.g.: > > charles@hawk:~$ gv > /home/charles/versioned/bare.metal/Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO.ps > & [1] 862194 charles@hawk:~$ [1]+ Done gv > /home/charles/versioned/bare.metal/Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO.ps > charles@hawk:~$ > > And then report what you saw. In this case, I saw the document opened > in gv, and saw no errors in it. Thanks. But before I go on, it seems to be a known bug: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=gv;dist=unstable Can we hope it will be soon fixed? (It also seems that the last gv release is from 2013) Rodolfo
Re: Problems with gv after upgrade
On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 16:40:53 + Rodolfo Medina wrote: > My PS file is regularly read by evince, simply with > > $ evince file.ps > > Instead, with gv, as I always did before: > > $ gv file.ps > > the application starts but the file won't open Not enough. Show us *exactly* what you typed and the results. Paths, if any, and all. Everything. Start with the command prompt, and copy and paste to the next command prompt. E.g.: charles@hawk:~$ gv /home/charles/versioned/bare.metal/Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO.ps & [1] 862194 charles@hawk:~$ [1]+ Donegv /home/charles/versioned/bare.metal/Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO.ps charles@hawk:~$ And then report what you saw. In this case, I saw the document opened in gv, and saw no errors in it. -- Does anybody read signatures any more? https://charlescurley.com https://charlescurley.com/blog/
Re: Problems with gv after upgrade
Celejar writes: > On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:06:16 + > Rodolfo Medina wrote: > >> After upgrading to Unstable, gv does not read my PS files any more. I >> couldn't >> find any help in Internet. Please help, thanks in advance. > > You can do better than this - what command did you use? What error did > you get? My PS file is regularly read by evince, simply with $ evince file.ps Instead, with gv, as I always did before: $ gv file.ps the application starts but the file won't open: the same with $ flpsed file.ps Either the printer won't work since upgrading: is it related? Thanks, Rodolfo
Re: Problems with gv after upgrade
On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:06:16 + Rodolfo Medina wrote: > Hi all. > > After upgrading to Unstable, gv does not read my PS files any more. I > couldn't > find any help in Internet. Please help, thanks in advance. You can do better than this - what command did you use? What error did you get? > Rodolfo -- Celejar
Problems with gv after upgrade
Hi all. After upgrading to Unstable, gv does not read my PS files any more. I couldn't find any help in Internet. Please help, thanks in advance. Rodolfo
gv won't show footers
Hi all. With Debian Sid: when gv reads a `.ps' file, page numbers are half cut off. The same file and its footers are properly read by gv in older Debian boxes. Please help anybody can. Thanks! Rodolfo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87d24wtn01@gmail.com
Re: bad surprise using ghostview (gv)
I am adding below a few more details to my last post, especially since I carried a few more tests : Bernard wrote: Roger Leigh wrote: On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:28:22AM +0100, Bernard wrote: Roger Leigh wrote: On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 09:32:42AM -0500, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: On 02/12/2011 08:59 AM, Bernard wrote: ...snip... But then I fail to understand: as explained in my original post, CUPS+GUTENPRINT does work with my DeskJet-1120C, it provides good quality color printing from OpenOffice as well as from the GIMP, only from GhostView does it print B/W with low quality Hmm, I do see that a number of HP Colour Deskjets are now listed, so you may well be correct. Historically, this was a problem; maybe that's fixed or partially fixed now. Now ? But, as explained in my original post, the same CUPS config did allow good quality color printing of ps files using 'gv' (GhostView), as well as OpenOffice and the GIMP, BEFORE I replace Debian Sarge by Lenny, that is, in the date range 2006-2009. gv is just using lpr/lp to print. So, if for example you print the file directly with lpr -P printer $file.ps, is it still monochrome? Yes it is. This will eliminate gs, in case it's causing the problem. When you print from the GIMP, are you using the regular Print dialogue, or are you using the Print with Gutenprint dialogue (gimp-gutenprint)? With the GIMP, I am using the regular print dialogue... and it prints nicely with colors. It still does, for I have carried some more tests, so as to eliminate problems that could have arisen since. A precision here. In the line above, I meant using the GIMP for the purpose of printing images such as jpg or tif files. So far I had never tried to import postscript files into the GIMP, not even knowing if it was possible. So, I have just tested it. My ps files do import all right into the GIMP, and, from the GIMP, they do print with colors (no color if printing with 'gv' or just using lpr directly). However, with the GIMP, the quality is rather poor, except if I opt for strong dithering during import. I also just tested the import of my ps file into OpenOffice. It does import it into OpenOffice_draw, and, from there, it prints with color and good quality. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d57a8f4.5000...@teaser.fr
bad surprise using ghostview (gv)
Hi to Everyone, I have quite often used 'gv' (ghostview) up to about a year and a half ago or so. I displayed ps files with it, and then printed them. To be more precise, the ps files were ancestry charts generated by a genealogy software called 'lifelines'. Everything went OK at that time. But this no longer works well. 'gv' still displays those charts allright on the screen, but, if I print them, they come out Black and White with a mediocre printing quality. A year and a half ago, when everything printed OK, I was running Debian Sarge. Since then I have installed Lenny (a new install, not just an upgrade). My printer is the same : DeskJet-1120C ; it still works OK with other apps and still prints color when using OO.org or the GIMP. The man pages of 'gv' don't mention anything particular about printing. To display lifelines generated ps files, I just type: gv myfile.ps and the file does display nicely with its colors. Then I click onto the box 'FILE' and 'Print Document', which is exactly what I used to do before. Then a dialog box comes in, proposing to write a print command, which starts with 'lpr'. I then add '-PDeskJet-1120C' to the already displayed 'lpr', which gives: lpr -PDeskJet-1120C. If, discarding the use of 'gv', I just print the ps file directly as follows: lpr -PDeskJet-1120C myfile.ps I get exactly the same printing result (poor quality, black and white) The man pages of 'lpr' make mention of a '-o' argument that - if I caught it well - should allow to precise details, but no more is said about this. In any case, as previously said, I used to be able to directly print with colours using 'gv'. The printer is being reckognised allright, and, if I make a spelling mistake, for instance if I write 'deskJet-1120C' or 'DeskJet_1120C', I get error messages saying that the printer is not found. In the other hand, if I write nothing in front of 'lpr', it still prints, with the same poor quality as if using the proper printer name. Would I be missing a GV or GS related library, or is there a know problem or bug with newer versions of gv/gs (well, I mean newer than in Sarge time) Thanks in advance for your help. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d56925a.2060...@teaser.fr
Re: bad surprise using ghostview (gv)
On 02/12/2011 08:59 AM, Bernard wrote: ...snip... If, discarding the use of 'gv', I just print the ps file directly as follows: lpr -PDeskJet-1120C myfile.ps I get exactly the same printing result (poor quality, black and white) ...snip... If I'm understanding correctly what you've written, it seems to me that your problem may not be ghostview. I think you might want to try specifying different drivers for your printer to see if others might work better. You might also want to provide a bit of information about your system. I run Debian testing on all of my systems, and I recently had to switch from hpijs drivers to CUPS+Gutenprint on all of my HP LaserJet printers for a similar problem. (They weren't dithering or shading properly, but simly printing black white.) -Gilbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d569a0a.9030...@comcast.net
Re: bad surprise using ghostview (gv)
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 09:32:42AM -0500, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: On 02/12/2011 08:59 AM, Bernard wrote: ...snip... If, discarding the use of 'gv', I just print the ps file directly as follows: lpr -PDeskJet-1120C myfile.ps I get exactly the same printing result (poor quality, black and white) ...snip... If I'm understanding correctly what you've written, it seems to me that your problem may not be ghostview. I think you might want to try specifying different drivers for your printer to see if others might work better. You might also want to provide a bit of information about your system. I run Debian testing on all of my systems, and I recently had to switch from hpijs drivers to CUPS+Gutenprint on all of my HP LaserJet printers for a similar problem. (They weren't dithering or shading properly, but simly printing black white.) Note that while Gutenprint has excellent support for Epson, Canon and other colour inkjects, PCL-based HP deskjets are (AFAICT) only supported in black and white. Good for monochrome lasers where the fine dithering can greatly improve quality, but not so good for inkjets, so if this is the case, you might wasnt to look at hplip instead. There currently isn't a maintainer for the PCL driver to add colour support. If someone took the time, it would probably add significant quality improvement over hplip/hpijs, since it would make use of the more advanced dithering and colour handling of gutenprint. Regards, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/ `-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: bad surprise using ghostview (gv)
On 02/12/2011 04:11 PM, Roger Leigh wrote: On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 09:32:42AM -0500, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: On 02/12/2011 08:59 AM, Bernard wrote: ...snip... If, discarding the use of 'gv', I just print the ps file directly as follows: lpr -PDeskJet-1120C myfile.ps I get exactly the same printing result (poor quality, black and white) ...snip... If I'm understanding correctly what you've written, it seems to me that your problem may not be ghostview. I think you might want to try specifying different drivers for your printer to see if others might work better. You might also want to provide a bit of information about your system. I run Debian testing on all of my systems, and I recently had to switch from hpijs drivers to CUPS+Gutenprint on all of my HP LaserJet printers for a similar problem. (They weren't dithering or shading properly, but simly printing black white.) Note that while Gutenprint has excellent support for Epson, Canon and other colour inkjects, PCL-based HP deskjets are (AFAICT) only supported in black and white. Good for monochrome lasers where the fine dithering can greatly improve quality, but not so good for inkjets, so if this is the case, you might wasnt to look at hplip instead. There currently isn't a maintainer for the PCL driver to add colour support. If someone took the time, it would probably add significant quality improvement over hplip/hpijs, since it would make use of the more advanced dithering and colour handling of gutenprint. Regards, Roger Thank you very, very much for this information. It fits with what I've seen. And I'm just in the process of adding a couple of inkjet-based HP MFPs to the mix here, so this is very very timely bit of data for me. Regards, Gilbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d56f8d8.9050...@comcast.net
Re: bad surprise using ghostview (gv)
Gilbert Sullivan wrote: On 02/12/2011 08:59 AM, Bernard wrote: ...snip... If, discarding the use of 'gv', I just print the ps file directly as follows: lpr -PDeskJet-1120C myfile.ps I get exactly the same printing result (poor quality, black and white) ...snip... If I'm understanding correctly what you've written, it seems to me that your problem may not be ghostview. I think you might want to try specifying different drivers for your printer to see if others might work better. You might also want to provide a bit of information about your system. I am on Debian Lenny, and CUPS 1.3.8 is installed. My DeskJet-1120C is the only printer defined in cups. On http://localhost:631, it says: HP DeskJet 1120 C - CUPS + Gutenprint v5.0.2 URL parallel:/dev/lp0 General default media size A4 Color Model RGB Color The CUPS test page prints OK with due colors In my older system (Debian Sarge), I also had cups, but I wonder if hpijs was not installed too. In here, it was not installed, but I just did installed it, with no difference in the end printing result. A 'man hpijs' says: 'Ghostscript will run it if the ijs server parameter is set to 'IjsServer=hpijs' when invoking the IJS driver'. But I don't know how to go about to carry that test, since a 'man ghostscript' does not explain how invoke it the right way ; 'gs -sDEVICE=IJS myfile.ps' sends an error saying that device IJS is not found I run Debian testing on all of my systems, and I recently had to switch from hpijs drivers to CUPS+Gutenprint on all of my HP LaserJet printers for a similar problem. (They weren't dithering or shading properly, but simly printing black white.) Here it seems to be the opposite: CUPS with Gutenprint gives poor black and white prints, and I am trying to test hpijs... to no avail so far -Gilbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d57030a.8090...@teaser.fr
Re: bad surprise using ghostview (gv)
Roger Leigh wrote: On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 09:32:42AM -0500, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: On 02/12/2011 08:59 AM, Bernard wrote: ...snip... If, discarding the use of 'gv', I just print the ps file directly as follows: lpr -PDeskJet-1120C myfile.ps I get exactly the same printing result (poor quality, black and white) ...snip... If I'm understanding correctly what you've written, it seems to me that your problem may not be ghostview. I think you might want to try specifying different drivers for your printer to see if others might work better. You might also want to provide a bit of information about your system. I run Debian testing on all of my systems, and I recently had to switch from hpijs drivers to CUPS+Gutenprint on all of my HP LaserJet printers for a similar problem. (They weren't dithering or shading properly, but simly printing black white.) Note that while Gutenprint has excellent support for Epson, Canon and other colour inkjects, PCL-based HP deskjets are (AFAICT) only supported in black and white. Good for monochrome lasers where the fine dithering can greatly improve quality, but not so good for inkjets, so if this is the case, you might wasnt to look at hplip instead. But then I fail to understand: as explained in my original post, CUPS+GUTENPRINT does work with my DeskJet-1120C, it provides good quality color printing from OpenOffice as well as from the GIMP, only from GhostView does it print B/W with low quality -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d571796.7080...@teaser.fr
Re: bad surprise using ghostview (gv)
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:28:22AM +0100, Bernard wrote: Roger Leigh wrote: On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 09:32:42AM -0500, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: On 02/12/2011 08:59 AM, Bernard wrote: ...snip... If, discarding the use of 'gv', I just print the ps file directly as follows: lpr -PDeskJet-1120C myfile.ps I get exactly the same printing result (poor quality, black and white) ...snip... If I'm understanding correctly what you've written, it seems to me that your problem may not be ghostview. I think you might want to try specifying different drivers for your printer to see if others might work better. You might also want to provide a bit of information about your system. I run Debian testing on all of my systems, and I recently had to switch from hpijs drivers to CUPS+Gutenprint on all of my HP LaserJet printers for a similar problem. (They weren't dithering or shading properly, but simly printing black white.) Note that while Gutenprint has excellent support for Epson, Canon and other colour inkjects, PCL-based HP deskjets are (AFAICT) only supported in black and white. Good for monochrome lasers where the fine dithering can greatly improve quality, but not so good for inkjets, so if this is the case, you might wasnt to look at hplip instead. But then I fail to understand: as explained in my original post, CUPS+GUTENPRINT does work with my DeskJet-1120C, it provides good quality color printing from OpenOffice as well as from the GIMP, only from GhostView does it print B/W with low quality Hmm, I do see that a number of HP Colour Deskjets are now listed, so you may well be correct. Historically, this was a problem; maybe that's fixed or partially fixed now. gv is just using lpr/lp to print. So, if for example you print the file directly with lpr -P printer $file.ps, is it still monochrome? This will eliminate gs, in case it's causing the problem. When you print from the GIMP, are you using the regular Print dialogue, or are you using the Print with Gutenprint dialogue (gimp-gutenprint)? The former prints via the normal printing system (as if you did it with lpr), and sends either the pixmap or the pixmap embedded in PostScript to the print queue. The Gutenprint dialogue does all the rendering inside GIMP and sends raw printer commands to the queue (lpr -o raw). If the printer is misconfigured in CUPS, that could explain why it works from the GIMP. It doesn't explain OpenOffice though. Regards, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/ `-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: bad surprise using ghostview (gv)
Roger Leigh wrote: On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:28:22AM +0100, Bernard wrote: Roger Leigh wrote: On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 09:32:42AM -0500, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: On 02/12/2011 08:59 AM, Bernard wrote: ...snip... If, discarding the use of 'gv', I just print the ps file directly as follows: lpr -PDeskJet-1120C myfile.ps I get exactly the same printing result (poor quality, black and white) ...snip... If I'm understanding correctly what you've written, it seems to me that your problem may not be ghostview. I think you might want to try specifying different drivers for your printer to see if others might work better. You might also want to provide a bit of information about your system. I run Debian testing on all of my systems, and I recently had to switch from hpijs drivers to CUPS+Gutenprint on all of my HP LaserJet printers for a similar problem. (They weren't dithering or shading properly, but simly printing black white.) Note that while Gutenprint has excellent support for Epson, Canon and other colour inkjects, PCL-based HP deskjets are (AFAICT) only supported in black and white. Good for monochrome lasers where the fine dithering can greatly improve quality, but not so good for inkjets, so if this is the case, you might wasnt to look at hplip instead. But then I fail to understand: as explained in my original post, CUPS+GUTENPRINT does work with my DeskJet-1120C, it provides good quality color printing from OpenOffice as well as from the GIMP, only from GhostView does it print B/W with low quality Hmm, I do see that a number of HP Colour Deskjets are now listed, so you may well be correct. Historically, this was a problem; maybe that's fixed or partially fixed now. Now ? But, as explained in my original post, the same CUPS config did allow good quality color printing of ps files using 'gv' (GhostView), as well as OpenOffice and the GIMP, before I replace Debian Sarge by Lenny, that is, in the date range 2006-2009. gv is just using lpr/lp to print. So, if for example you print the file directly with lpr -P printer $file.ps, is it still monochrome? Yes it is. This will eliminate gs, in case it's causing the problem. When you print from the GIMP, are you using the regular Print dialogue, or are you using the Print with Gutenprint dialogue (gimp-gutenprint)? With the GIMP, I am using the regular print dialogue... and it prints nicely with colors. It still does, for I have carried some more tests, so as to eliminate problems that could have arisen since. The former prints via the normal printing system (as if you did it with lpr), and sends either the pixmap or the pixmap embedded in PostScript to the print queue. The Gutenprint dialogue does all the rendering inside GIMP and sends raw printer commands to the queue (lpr -o raw). If the printer is misconfigured in CUPS, that could explain why it works from the GIMP. It doesn't explain OpenOffice though. Please see - in my more recent post - the results of my tests with CUPS. The test page from CUPS prints nicely with due colors. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d572c8f.20...@teaser.fr
Re: Driver for Gigabyte NVidia GV-N220OC-1GI card?
Hey, As far as I know, Lenny and squeeze do not have the newest nVidia binary driver packaged, and I think you need the newest ( 19X.XXX ) driver to use that card, I cant check because nVidias website seems to be down at the moment though. There is two ways to install the nVidia driver the nVidia way rather than the debian way. 1) The easy automatic way, with sgfxi: http://techpatterns.com/forums/about933.html 2) The Manual nVidia way: http://www.linuxforums.org/forum/debian-linux-help/113053-apt-get-older-versions-applications.html#post548590 http://www.linuxforums.org/forum/debian-linux-help/113053-apt-get-older-versions-applications.html#post548590I use #1 without any problems. (note this email assumes you are looking for the nVidia binary driver, though sgfxi can also install and setup the nv free driver as well, read the page) Regards, Angus. http://www.linuxforums.org/forum/debian-linux-help/113053-apt-get-older-versions-applications.html#post548590 On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Linux User linux.user...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I was wondering if there was a generic driver I could use for my Gigabyte GT220 or GV-N220OC-1GI card: The product page: http://www.gigabyte.com.au/Support/VGA/Driver_Model.aspx?ProductID=3188 Thanks for any help. It seemed like other distributions auto-detect it and try to use a generic NVidia card, but unfortunately it crashed and didn't work. Cheers. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/40a027ee1003012148na383331s3de07711fc946...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Driver for Gigabyte NVidia GV-N220OC-1GI card?
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Angus Hedger demide...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, As far as I know, Lenny and squeeze do not have the newest nVidia binary driver packaged, and I think you need the newest ( 19X.XXX ) driver to use that card, I cant check because nVidias website seems to be down at the moment though. There is two ways to install the nVidia driver the nVidia way rather than the debian way. 1) The easy automatic way, with sgfxi: http://techpatterns.com/forums/about933.html Wow ! The script is 6268 line long ! What does it bring that module-assistant a-i nvidia does not provide ? Thanks, -- Mathieu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/bf0c3b3f1003020922g18d88cddp39c0233c22f2...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Driver for Gigabyte NVidia GV-N220OC-1GI card?
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Angus Hedger demide...@gmail.com wrote: snip 1) The easy automatic way, with sgfxi: http://techpatterns.com/forums/about933.html Wow ! The script is 6268 line long ! What does it bring that module-assistant a-i nvidia does not provide ? Thanks, -- Mathieu Hey, Well, really it allows a quick and easy way to move back and forwards between nv and the nVidia binary driver. The reason its so large is that it does ATI/nVidia free and non free drivers for multiple distros. But really its just there to make life easier ;) Regards, Angus.
Driver for Gigabyte NVidia GV-N220OC-1GI card?
Hello, I was wondering if there was a generic driver I could use for my Gigabyte GT220 or GV-N220OC-1GI card: The product page: http://www.gigabyte.com.au/Support/VGA/Driver_Model.aspx?ProductID=3188 Thanks for any help. It seemed like other distributions auto-detect it and try to use a generic NVidia card, but unfortunately it crashed and didn't work. Cheers. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/40a027ee1003012148na383331s3de07711fc946...@mail.gmail.com
default gv paper size
How do I set the default paper size for gv? It always comes up A4 but I always want letter. Should I make in entry in ~/.gv? What is the format? -- But a government in which the majority rule in all cases can not be based on justice, even as far as men understand it. -- Henry David Thoreau Rick Pasottor...@niof.nethttp://www.niof.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: default gv paper size
On Thu,01.Jan.09, 11:42:52, Rick Pasotto wrote: How do I set the default paper size for gv? It always comes up A4 but I always want letter. Should I make in entry in ~/.gv? What is the format? Try 'dpkg-reconfigure libpaper1' Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: default gv paper size
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 07:02:26PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: On Thu,01.Jan.09, 11:42:52, Rick Pasotto wrote: How do I set the default paper size for gv? It always comes up A4 but I always want letter. Should I make in entry in ~/.gv? What is the format? Try 'dpkg-reconfigure libpaper1' At least you did say 'try'. It would be better to speak from knowledge instead of guessing. My default system paper size is and always has been letter. gv does not pay any attention. -- The authority of government ... to be strictly just, it must have the sanction and consent of the governed. It can have no pure right over my person and property but what I concede to it. -- Henry David Thoreau Rick Pasottor...@niof.nethttp://www.niof.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: default gv paper size
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 11:42:52AM -0500, Rick Pasotto wrote: How do I set the default paper size for gv? It always comes up A4 but I always want letter. Should I make in entry in ~/.gv? What is the format? gv has menus where you can choose the settings. Choose the default paper there. However, if the ps file is done in A4, it will show A4. You would need to convert the file so that it is rendered on a letter size paper. This is assuming that we're talking about a ps file and not pdf. Doug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: default gv paper size
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 12:28:39PM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote: On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 11:42:52AM -0500, Rick Pasotto wrote: How do I set the default paper size for gv? It always comes up A4 but I always want letter. Should I make in entry in ~/.gv? What is the format? gv has menus where you can choose the settings. Choose the default paper there. That did it. It was not obvious to me that the button labeled 'State' is where you change preferences. -- The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilised community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. His own good, either physical or moral, is not a sufficient warrant. -- John Stuart Mill, 1859 Rick Pasottor...@niof.nethttp://www.niof.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: default gv paper size
On 2009-01-01 12:28:39 -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote: gv has menus where you can choose the settings. Choose the default paper there. There are also X resources. For instance, /etc/X11/app-defaults/GV contains !GV.fallbackPageMedia: a4 here (note that ! means that the line is commented out). -- Vincent Lefèvre vinc...@vinc17.org - Web: http://www.vinc17.org/ 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: http://www.vinc17.org/blog/ Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: default gv paper size
On Thu,01.Jan.09, 12:24:04, Rick Pasotto wrote: On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 07:02:26PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: On Thu,01.Jan.09, 11:42:52, Rick Pasotto wrote: How do I set the default paper size for gv? It always comes up A4 but I always want letter. Should I make in entry in ~/.gv? What is the format? Try 'dpkg-reconfigure libpaper1' At least you did say 'try'. It would be better to speak from knowledge instead of guessing. My default system paper size is and always has been letter. gv does not pay any attention. Maybe it doesn't hurt to mention such details in the initial post, in order to avoid unhelpful replies like mine :) Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: gv (gs) not producing full plots on AMD64 with nVidia
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 18:27:19 +0100, michael wrote: I'm running Debian etch on my AMD64 box. It has an nVidia GeForce 6600 card and I'm using nVidia's module driver (v169.12). When I try and use 'gv' to display an IDL-produced plot it gives a partial plot, the cursor shows that interpretting is progressing but it never completes the plot. (If I take the same file and run it through 'gv' on another machine there is no problem and the plot is plotted within a second or so.) I'd welcome ideas on how to diagnose what's happening and on how to fix it. Make sure that you actually use the same version of ghostscript on both machines, e.g. by comparing the output of this: dpkg -l ghostscript\* gs-\* | awk '/^[^D|+]/{print $1,$2,$3}' | column -t From your symptoms I would suspect that something is wrong with ghostscript; however, you can easily test the nvidia hypothesis by switching X to the vesa driver and opening the file again. -- Regards,| http://users.icfo.es/Florian.Kulzer Florian | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: gv (gs) not producing full plots on AMD64 with nVidia
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 19:01 +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote: On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 18:27:19 +0100, michael wrote: I'm running Debian etch on my AMD64 box. It has an nVidia GeForce 6600 card and I'm using nVidia's module driver (v169.12). When I try and use 'gv' to display an IDL-produced plot it gives a partial plot, the cursor shows that interpretting is progressing but it never completes the plot. (If I take the same file and run it through 'gv' on another machine there is no problem and the plot is plotted within a second or so.) I'd welcome ideas on how to diagnose what's happening and on how to fix it. Make sure that you actually use the same version of ghostscript on both machines, e.g. by comparing the output of this: dpkg -l ghostscript\* gs-\* | awk '/^[^D|+]/{print $1,$2,$3}' | column -t From your symptoms I would suspect that something is wrong with ghostscript; however, you can easily test the nvidia hypothesis by switching X to the vesa driver and opening the file again. Folks, it turns out it was the file that was incomplete (copying it about at different times clouded the issue) ie I've discovered my IDL code not closing the IDL output (postscript) file (I needed a device,/close line)... added that and it seems to work now hooray! -- Regards,| http://users.icfo.es/Florian.Kulzer Florian | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gv (gs) not producing full plots on AMD64 with nVidia
I'm running Debian etch on my AMD64 box. It has an nVidia GeForce 6600 card and I'm using nVidia's module driver (v169.12). When I try and use 'gv' to display an IDL-produced plot it gives a partial plot, the cursor shows that interpretting is progressing but it never completes the plot. (If I take the same file and run it through 'gv' on another machine there is no problem and the plot is plotted within a second or so.) I'd welcome ideas on how to diagnose what's happening and on how to fix it. Thanks, M -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
selected pages printing from gv gives random output on laserprinter
Hello, This is an odd problem I have just noticed. On a Brother HL-2070N Laser Printer if I print a few pages from gv by selecting them, that goes okay. However, if then deselect those pages and select another set and print them, thing go wrong and the output is odd characters here and there on the printouts. If I print the whole document in one go, the printout is okay. Finally, the problem does not occur when printing from acrobat reader (either the whole document or selects sets of pages one after the other). Any suggestions how to track down what is causing the problem? This is on Debian Lenny. The printer is being used via the Brother HL-2060 Foomatic/hl1250 (recommended) driver. thanks, -HS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: selected pages printing from gv gives random output
* From: H.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] if I print a few pages from gv by selecting them, that goes okay. However, if then deselect those pages and select another set and print them, thing go wrong and the output is odd characters here and there on the printouts. at first look it seems a gv bug. Does it happen if you restart gv and then select the new pages ? Does it happen if, without restarting gv, you re-open the file and select the new pages ? Does it happen if, instead of printing the newly marked pages you save them and then print the resulting ps file ? This might give a workaround or some details for a reportbug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: selected pages printing from gv gives random output
NN_il_Confusionario wrote: * From: H.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] if I print a few pages from gv by selecting them, that goes okay. However, if then deselect those pages and select another set and print them, thing go wrong and the output is odd characters here and there on the printouts. at first look it seems a gv bug. Does it happen if you restart gv and then select the new pages ? Does it happen if, without restarting gv, you re-open the file and select the new pages ? Does it happen if, instead of printing the newly marked pages you save them and then print the resulting ps file ? This might give a workaround or some details for a reportbug. I will try to do these and report back the results. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: (solved)Re: why these files can't be displayed properly by gv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Serena Cantor wrote: Thank you for your efforts! I convert it to pdf with ps2pdf, then open it with Adobe Reader of Windows, it's fine. Please don't top post on this list. It seems to me that reverting to using windows to view Unix documents is a poor way. There are many pdf viewers in Debian, and if you have to, you can even get Adobe Reader for Linux. If you're serious about running Debian, then do yourself a favor and dump (or at least forget about) Windows. You will never learn Unix if you don't use it. Figuring out how to do things is one of the best ways to learn. Not reading a dry book. Although, books and other documentation are quite valuable nothing beats getting your hands dirty. --- Greg Folkert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 15:10 -0700, Serena Cantor wrote: I have sarge and gv, I find tutorial below is useful: http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/docs/unix-tutorials/courses/unix.ps however, it can't be displayed properly by gv what's the problem? It doesn't display properly in a few viewers I used to display it. It might be that it is in booklet format. Which means two facing pages per landscape page. I did: wget http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/docs/unix-tutorials/courses/unix.ps ps2pdf unix.ps Opened it in doc-viewer (evince) and it opened just fine. Again, multiple viewers I used, 6 in total that are supposed to be able to look at .ps files easily, not one could properly render it past the first 3 characters. In the middle of the lefthand side, An I is all I got to see. A shame that one has to keep 6 viewers on their system. You'd think one or two would be enough. My guess, the landscape format is killing it. Plus the file is 14 years old, back then postscript was slightly different than it is now. You're probably right. Joe - -- Registerd Linux user #443289 at http://counter.li.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGPsKPiXBCVWpc5J4RAii0AJ0TJqtwIcTaPWga0fn6yoCGyhAWUQCeL2WT pnI+CVnu44BYvgkqeHJDBN0= =dkfi -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: (solved)Re: why these files can't be displayed properly by gv
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 08:09 +0200, Joe Hart wrote: Serena Cantor wrote: Thank you for your efforts! I convert it to pdf with ps2pdf, then open it with Adobe Reader of Windows, it's fine. --- Greg Folkert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 15:10 -0700, Serena Cantor wrote: I have sarge and gv, I find tutorial below is useful: http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/docs/unix-tutorials/courses/unix.ps however, it can't be displayed properly by gv what's the problem? It doesn't display properly in a few viewers I used to display it. It might be that it is in booklet format. Which means two facing pages per landscape page. I did: wget http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/docs/unix-tutorials/courses/unix.ps ps2pdf unix.ps Opened it in doc-viewer (evince) and it opened just fine. Again, multiple viewers I used, 6 in total that are supposed to be able to look at .ps files easily, not one could properly render it past the first 3 characters. In the middle of the lefthand side, An I is all I got to see. A shame that one has to keep 6 viewers on their system. You'd think one or two would be enough. No, I don't keep 6 viewers on my system. I have the luxury of running a Linux distribution called Debian. It allows me to install use and remove packages very easily. I really believe it is the shizzle for my izzle as I can do nearly anything I want without having to compile or convert these packages. I don't have to worry about dependency issues or anything of the like. That said, I can also remove the packages just as easily. Which I did. My guess, the landscape format is killing it. Plus the file is 14 years old, back then postscript was slightly different than it is now. You're probably right. I hope so. Of course, you really need to switch to Debian Linux. (-; -- greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key: 1024D/B524687C 2003-08-05 Fingerprint: E1D3 E3D7 5850 957E FED0 2B3A ED66 6971 B524 687C Alternate Fingerprint: 09F9 1102 9D74 E35B D841 56C5 6356 88C0 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: (solved)Re: why these files can't be displayed properly by gv
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 08:09 +0200, Joe Hart wrote: Figuring out how to do things is one of the best ways to learn. Not reading a dry book. Although, books and other documentation are quite valuable nothing beats getting your hands dirty. --- Greg Folkert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My guess, the landscape format is killing it. Plus the file is 14 years old, back then postscript was slightly different than it is now. You're probably right. And yet, I can easily read a dry book printed bound more than 100 years ago, but a file that's a mere 14 years old creates problems for various apps that are supposed to render it. Makes you wonder how much information will ultimately be lost because of this blind faith in computers. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
why these files can't be displayed properly by gv
I have sarge and gv, I find tutorial below is useful: http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/docs/unix-tutorials/courses/unix.ps however, it can't be displayed properly by gv what's the problem? Don't pick lemons. See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos. http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: why these files can't be displayed properly by gv
On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 15:10 -0700, Serena Cantor wrote: I have sarge and gv, I find tutorial below is useful: http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/docs/unix-tutorials/courses/unix.ps however, it can't be displayed properly by gv what's the problem? It doesn't display properly in a few viewers I used to display it. It might be that it is in booklet format. Which means two facing pages per landscape page. I did: wget http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/docs/unix-tutorials/courses/unix.ps ps2pdf unix.ps Opened it in doc-viewer (evince) and it opened just fine. Again, multiple viewers I used, 6 in total that are supposed to be able to look at .ps files easily, not one could properly render it past the first 3 characters. In the middle of the lefthand side, An I is all I got to see. My guess, the landscape format is killing it. Plus the file is 14 years old, back then postscript was slightly different than it is now. -- greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key: 1024D/B524687C 2003-08-05 Fingerprint: E1D3 E3D7 5850 957E FED0 2B3A ED66 6971 B524 687C Alternate Fingerprint: 09F9 1102 9D74 E35B D841 56C5 6356 88C0 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
(solved)Re: why these files can't be displayed properly by gv
Thank you for your efforts! I convert it to pdf with ps2pdf, then open it with Adobe Reader of Windows, it's fine. --- Greg Folkert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 15:10 -0700, Serena Cantor wrote: I have sarge and gv, I find tutorial below is useful: http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/docs/unix-tutorials/courses/unix.ps however, it can't be displayed properly by gv what's the problem? It doesn't display properly in a few viewers I used to display it. It might be that it is in booklet format. Which means two facing pages per landscape page. I did: wget http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/docs/unix-tutorials/courses/unix.ps ps2pdf unix.ps Opened it in doc-viewer (evince) and it opened just fine. Again, multiple viewers I used, 6 in total that are supposed to be able to look at .ps files easily, not one could properly render it past the first 3 characters. In the middle of the lefthand side, An I is all I got to see. My guess, the landscape format is killing it. Plus the file is 14 years old, back then postscript was slightly different than it is now. -- greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key: 1024D/B524687C 2003-08-05 Fingerprint: E1D3 E3D7 5850 957E FED0 2B3A ED66 6971 B524 687C Alternate Fingerprint: 09F9 1102 9D74 E35B D841 56C5 6356 88C0 Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gv et impression
Bonjour, j'utilise gv pour imprimer les fichiers .ps, avec etch. J'avais configuré gv à partir des menus pour que ma commande d'impression soit : lpr -P BROTHER_HL-1430 -# 1 Depuis quelques temps, cette commande est réduite à lpr, ce qui m'oblige à compléter manuellement à chaque impression. J'ai vérifié le fichier ~/.gv, et j'ai bien : GV.printCommand:lpr -P BROTHER_HL-1430 -# 1 J'ai même essayé GV.printCommand:lpr -P BROTHER_HL-1430 -# 1 Mais rien n'y fait. Quelqu'un a-t-il constaté le même défaut ? faut-il faire un rapport de bug ? A+ -- Pierre Meurisse -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Vous pouvez aussi ajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gnome-gv
Hello List, I have just upgraded my Etch box: gnome-gv seems to removed, why ? Jerome -- Jerome BENOIT jgmbenoit_at_mailsnare_dot_net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: gnome-gv
On Mon, Dec 25, 2006 at 09:49:03AM +0800, Jerome BENOIT wrote: Hello List, I have just upgraded my Etch box: gnome-gv seems to removed, why ? It appears to have been removed from Etch. The bugs page does not show any RC bugs (open or closed), so I am not sure why. However, it is still in Sid: http://packages.debian.org/unstable/gnome/gnome-gv But it is only available for kfreebsd-i386 (unofficial port) right now. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: gnome-gv
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 09:49:03 +0800, Jerome BENOIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Hello List, I have just upgraded my Etch box: gnome-gv seems to removed, why ? gnome-gv has been superseded by evince. -- Hubert Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: gnome-gv
Hello List, thanks for the answer: evince looks good. Apparently it can superseed xpdf too. Thanks, Jerome Hubert Chan wrote: On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 09:49:03 +0800, Jerome BENOIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Hello List, I have just upgraded my Etch box: gnome-gv seems to removed, why ? gnome-gv has been superseded by evince. -- Jerome BENOIT jgmbenoit_at_mailsnare_dot_net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gv package..
I am running a debian derivative (Kanotix). I installed gv-3.6.2-1 after update but seems to have a problem. How can I reinstall older version gv-3.6.1-12? -ishwar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gv package..
Ishwar Rattan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am running a debian derivative (Kanotix). I installed gv-3.6.2-1 after update but seems to have a problem. How can I reinstall older version gv-3.6.1-12? -ishwar Assuming Kanotix uses .debs and apt-get (if not, your better off posting to a Kanotix list) I would: apt-get remove gv then find and download the kanotix .deb for gv-3.6.1-12 dpkg -i gv-3.6.1-12.deb (or whatever its called) -- -Angelina Carlton- orchid on irc.freenode.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bzgirl.org -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
error when opening gv
I'm running debian etch/testing From a shell, when opening any postscript file, I get this error message in a pop-up window; Warning: color name white is not defined Warning: color name black is not defined and in the shell I have these error messages; gv test.ps Warning: Color name gray71 is not defined Warning: Color name AntiqueWhite3 is not defined Warning: Color name black is not defined Warning: Color name AntiqueWhite2 is not defined Warning: Color name AntiqueWhite4 is not defined Warning: Color name gray65 is not defined Warning: Color name gray90 is not defined Warning: Color name gray40 is not defined Warning: Color name gray78 is not defined Warning: Color name gray85 is not defined Warning: Color name red is not defined Warning: Color name White is not defined Warning: Color name white is not defined Warning: Color name gray58 is not defined Any idea(s) as to how to fix them? -- Rodney D. Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Registered Linux User #96112 ICQ#: AIM#: YAHOO: 18002350 mailman452 mailman42_5 They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Ben Franklin - 1759 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: error when opening gv
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 04:35:14PM EDT, Rodney D. Myers wrote: I'm running debian etch/testing From a shell, when opening any postscript file, I get this error message in a pop-up window; Warning: color name white is not defined Warning: color name black is not defined and in the shell I have these error messages; gv test.ps Warning: Color name gray71 is not defined Warning: Color name AntiqueWhite3 is not defined Warning: Color name black is not defined Warning: Color name AntiqueWhite2 is not defined Warning: Color name AntiqueWhite4 is not defined Warning: Color name gray65 is not defined Warning: Color name gray90 is not defined Warning: Color name gray40 is not defined Warning: Color name gray78 is not defined Warning: Color name gray85 is not defined Warning: Color name red is not defined Warning: Color name White is not defined Warning: Color name white is not defined Warning: Color name gray58 is not defined Any idea(s) as to how to fix them? usually defined in /etc/X11/rgb.txt looks like gv cannot find it .. or its contents have been changed .. corrupted..? IIRC, this would affect other GUI apps as well .. gtk? Thanks cga -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: error when opening gv
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:44:13 -0400 cga2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 04:35:14PM EDT, Rodney D. Myers wrote: I'm running debian etch/testing From a shell, when opening any postscript file, I get this error message in a pop-up window; Warning: color name white is not defined Warning: color name black is not defined and in the shell I have these error messages; gv test.ps Warning: Color name gray71 is not defined Warning: Color name AntiqueWhite3 is not defined Warning: Color name black is not defined Warning: Color name AntiqueWhite2 is not defined Warning: Color name AntiqueWhite4 is not defined Warning: Color name gray65 is not defined Warning: Color name gray90 is not defined Warning: Color name gray40 is not defined Warning: Color name gray78 is not defined Warning: Color name gray85 is not defined Warning: Color name red is not defined Warning: Color name White is not defined Warning: Color name white is not defined Warning: Color name gray58 is not defined Any idea(s) as to how to fix them? usually defined in /etc/X11/rgb.txt looks like gv cannot find it .. or its contents have been changed .. corrupted..? IIRC, this would affect other GUI apps as well .. gtk? Thanks cga I think it's affecting WindowMaker, and other apps. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] ls -la /etc/X11/rgb.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 17371 2006-06-17 09:50 /etc/X11/rgb.txt It's been affecting my computer since etch went to XORG. I have black, and the rest of the colors defined. this is my /etc/X11/rgb.txt file; ! $Xorg: rgb.txt,v 1.3 2000/08/17 19:54:00 cpqbld Exp $ 255 250 250 snow 248 248 255 ghost white 248 248 255 GhostWhite 245 245 245 white smoke 245 245 245 WhiteSmoke 220 220 220 gainsboro 255 250 240 floral white 255 250 240 FloralWhite 253 245 230 old lace 253 245 230 OldLace 250 240 230 linen 250 235 215 antique white 250 235 215 AntiqueWhite 255 239 213 papaya whip 255 239 213 PapayaWhip 255 235 205 blanched almond 255 235 205 BlanchedAlmond 255 228 196 bisque 255 218 185 peach puff 255 218 185 PeachPuff 255 222 173 navajo white 255 222 173 NavajoWhite 255 228 181 moccasin 255 248 220 cornsilk 255 255 240 ivory 255 250 205 lemon chiffon 255 250 205 LemonChiffon 255 245 238 seashell 240 255 240 honeydew 245 255 250 mint cream 245 255 250 MintCream 240 255 255 azure 240 248 255 alice blue 240 248 255 AliceBlue 230 230 250 lavender 255 240 245 lavender blush 255 240 245 LavenderBlush 255 228 225 misty rose 255 228 225 MistyRose 255 255 255 white 0 0 0 black 47 79 79 dark slate gray 47 79 79 DarkSlateGray 47 79 79 dark slate grey 47 79 79 DarkSlateGrey 105 105 105 dim gray 105 105 105 DimGray 105 105 105 dim grey 105 105 105 DimGrey 112 128 144 slate gray 112 128 144 SlateGray 112 128 144 slate grey 112 128 144 SlateGrey 119 136 153 light slate gray 119 136 153 LightSlateGray 119 136 153 light slate grey 119 136 153 LightSlateGrey 190 190 190 gray 190 190 190 grey 211 211 211 light grey 211 211 211 LightGrey 211 211 211 light gray 211 211 211 LightGray 25 25 112 midnight blue 25 25 112 MidnightBlue 0 0 128 navy 0 0 128 navy blue 0 0 128 NavyBlue 100 149 237 cornflower blue 100 149 237 CornflowerBlue 72 61 139 dark slate blue 72 61 139 DarkSlateBlue 106 90 205 slate blue 106 90 205 SlateBlue 123 104 238 medium slate blue 123 104 238 MediumSlateBlue 132 112 255 light slate blue 132 112 255 LightSlateBlue 0 0 205 medium blue 0 0 205 MediumBlue 65 105 225 royal blue 65 105 225 RoyalBlue 0 0 255 blue 30 144 255 dodger blue 30 144 255 DodgerBlue 0 191 255 deep sky blue 0 191 255 DeepSkyBlue 135 206 235 sky blue 135 206 235 SkyBlue 135 206 250 light sky blue 135 206 250 LightSkyBlue 70 130 180 steel blue 70 130 180 SteelBlue 176 196 222 light steel blue 176 196 222
Re: error when opening gv
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 14:07:50 -0700, Rodney D. Myers wrote: On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:44:13 -0400 cga2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 04:35:14PM EDT, Rodney D. Myers wrote: I'm running debian etch/testing From a shell, when opening any postscript file, I get this error message in a pop-up window; Warning: color name white is not defined Warning: color name black is not defined and in the shell I have these error messages; gv test.ps Warning: Color name gray71 is not defined [ snip: the same message for several other colors ] Any idea(s) as to how to fix them? usually defined in /etc/X11/rgb.txt looks like gv cannot find it .. or its contents have been changed .. corrupted..? IIRC, this would affect other GUI apps as well .. gtk? [...] I think it's affecting WindowMaker, and other apps. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] ls -la /etc/X11/rgb.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 17371 2006-06-17 09:50 /etc/X11/rgb.txt It's been affecting my computer since etch went to XORG. I have black, and the rest of the colors defined. this is my /etc/X11/rgb.txt file; ! $Xorg: rgb.txt,v 1.3 2000/08/17 19:54:00 cpqbld Exp $ [ snip: rest of rgb.txt (identical to the file on my system) ] Check what your RGBpath really is; the default has changed for Xorg: $ grep -i rgbpath /var/log/Xorg.0.log (==) RgbPath set to /usr/share/X11/rgb You can either specify /etc/X11/rgb as the RGBpath in your xorg.conf (note: do not include the .txt, it is appended automatically) or you can create a symlink in /usr/share/X11/ which points to the other file. This is how it is set up on my box: $ file /usr/share/X11/rgb.txt /usr/share/X11/rgb.txt: symbolic link to `/etc/X11/rgb.txt' I don't remember if I did this myself or if it happened automatically during the upgrade. In any case, it seems to work. -- Regards, Florian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: error when opening gv
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 05:07:50PM EDT, Rodney D. Myers wrote: On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:44:13 -0400 cga2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 04:35:14PM EDT, Rodney D. Myers wrote: Since the colors are defined in your file it looks like gv cannot find it .. or -- long shot -- that xorg uses a different format (?) If you use wmaker there may be other error messages (possibly not from gv .. other apps) in wmaker's error log file -- or on the linux console if you startx wmaker.. Unfortunately I still use good ole xfree86 so I have zero experience with xorg. Unless you have a complicated history of X maintenance on that system (as opposed to an outa-the-box install of xorg) .. I would imagine that someone else may have run into a similar problem. Didn't see anything in google? xorg+rgb.txt returns a bunch of entries .. one says something about an RgbPath statement in the xorg config file. Thanks cga -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: error when opening gv
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:33:20 +0200 Florian Kulzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 14:07:50 -0700, Rodney D. Myers wrote: On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:44:13 -0400 cga2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 04:35:14PM EDT, Rodney D. Myers wrote: I'm running debian etch/testing From a shell, when opening any postscript file, I get this error message in a pop-up window; Warning: color name white is not defined Warning: color name black is not defined and in the shell I have these error messages; gv test.ps Warning: Color name gray71 is not defined [ snip: the same message for several other colors ] Any idea(s) as to how to fix them? usually defined in /etc/X11/rgb.txt looks like gv cannot find it .. or its contents have been changed .. corrupted..? IIRC, this would affect other GUI apps as well .. gtk? [...] I think it's affecting WindowMaker, and other apps. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] ls -la /etc/X11/rgb.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 17371 2006-06-17 09:50 /etc/X11/rgb.txt It's been affecting my computer since etch went to XORG. I have black, and the rest of the colors defined. this is my /etc/X11/rgb.txt file; ! $Xorg: rgb.txt,v 1.3 2000/08/17 19:54:00 cpqbld Exp $ [ snip: rest of rgb.txt (identical to the file on my system) ] Check what your RGBpath really is; the default has changed for Xorg: $ grep -i rgbpath /var/log/Xorg.0.log (==) RgbPath set to /usr/share/X11/rgb You can either specify /etc/X11/rgb as the RGBpath in your xorg.conf (note: do not include the .txt, it is appended automatically) or you can create a symlink in /usr/share/X11/ which points to the other file. This is how it is set up on my box: $ file /usr/share/X11/rgb.txt /usr/share/X11/rgb.txt: symbolic link to `/etc/X11/rgb.txt' I don't remember if I did this myself or if it happened automatically during the upgrade. In any case, it seems to work. -- Regards, Florian grep -i rgbpath /var/log/Xorg.0.log (**) RgbPath set to /etc/X11/rgb.txt file /usr/share/X11/rgb.txt /usr/share/X11/rgb.txt: symbolic link to `/etc/X11/rgb.txt' same as what you have -- Rodney D. Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Registered Linux User #96112 ICQ#: AIM#: YAHOO: 18002350 mailman452 mailman42_5 They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Ben Franklin - 1759 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: error when opening gv
Thanks to all. What I did was edit the /etc/X11/xorg.conf and changed rgb.txt to rbg, and then created/copied the rgb.txt to rgb. In a separate account, they worked. I could have sworn I did that in an earlier attempt. Again, many thanks -- Rodney D. Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Registered Linux User #96112 ICQ#: AIM#: YAHOO: 18002350 mailman452 mailman42_5 They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Ben Franklin - 1759 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: gv bug, maintainer please?
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 01:51:14PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: | On Thursday 26 January 2006 13:35, Linas Zvirblis wrote: | Does anyone know who the gv maintainer is? | | Martin A. Godisch $ aptitude show gv | fgrep Maintainer: Maintainer: Martin A. Godisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] The control file in the package supplies this information. | Humm, I googled for ghostview, and came up with a different name sent | him a short message describing what happened. You probably found the upstream developers, who are often not the same as the person who creates the debian package. -D -- Microsoft has argued that open source is bad for business, but you have to ask, Whose business? Theirs, or yours? --Tim O'Reilly www: http://dman13.dyndns.org/~dman/jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
gv stuck in a loop when printing?
Greetings all; Need quick answer folks, I'm burning paper by the ream here. I have gv, running on a BDI-4.30 install, printing the docs for a piece of the emc2 software package. I told it to print odd pages only as I normally do things duplex here. But ATM its on page 56 of the third copy of the odd pages. Whats going on and how do I stop it short of rebooting the machine? -- Cheers, Gene People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should add the word 'online' between the 'verizon', and the dot which bypasses vz's stupid bounce rules. I do use spamassassin too. :-) Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gv bug, maintainer please?
Greetings; Does anyone know who the gv maintainer is?, I have a bug report for him. -- Cheers, Gene People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should add the word 'online' between the 'verizon', and the dot which bypasses vz's stupid bounce rules. I do use spamassassin too. :-) Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: gv bug, maintainer please?
Does anyone know who the gv maintainer is? Martin A. Godisch I have a bug report for him. Bug are not reported against maintainers, but against packages they maintain. Read [ http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting ]. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: gv stuck in a loop when printing?
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:12:38 -0500 Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings all; Need quick answer folks, I'm burning paper by the ream here. I have gv, running on a BDI-4.30 install, printing the docs for a piece of the emc2 software package. I told it to print odd pages only as I normally do things duplex here. But ATM its on page 56 of the third copy of the odd pages. Whats going on and how do I stop it short of rebooting the machine? kill if in CUPS? are you running cups? if it printed through lp (lpr?) then cancel -a will kill all jobs. A -- Cheers, Gene People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should add the word 'online' between the 'verizon', and the dot which bypasses vz's stupid bounce rules. I do use spamassassin too. :-) Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpuB8z1UJwbQ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: gv bug, maintainer please?
On Thursday 26 January 2006 13:35, Linas Zvirblis wrote: Does anyone know who the gv maintainer is? Martin A. Godisch Humm, I googled for ghostview, and came up with a different name sent him a short message describing what happened. I have a bug report for him. Bug are not reported against maintainers, but against packages they maintain. Read [ http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting ]. Ok, I'll do that, thanks. -- Cheers, Gene People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should add the word 'online' between the 'verizon', and the dot which bypasses vz's stupid bounce rules. I do use spamassassin too. :-) Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: gv stuck in a loop when printing?
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 09:12:38AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: Greetings all; Need quick answer folks, I'm burning paper by the ream here. I have gv, running on a BDI-4.30 install, printing the docs for a piece of the emc2 software package. I told it to print odd pages only as I normally do things duplex here. But ATM its on page 56 of the third copy of the odd pages. Whats going on and how do I stop it short of rebooting the machine? Don't know what's going on, but lpq should list what's in the print queue, lprm job to remove job. Not sure if that works for all printing systems, but it has always worked for me. good luck gc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
some changes after upgrading Testing (locale ,gv)
Hi, I upgraded Debian Testing (2.6.12 kernel) yesterday and notice a few changes: 1. gv displays ps files differently. I can't say for sure, but anti-aliasing seems to be different now. It appears as if there is little difference between viewing anti-aliased file and viewing non-anti-aliased file (pressing the a key in gv toggles this option). I have: ii gs-common 0.3.9 ii gs-esp 8+8.15rc4.dfsg.1-2.1 ii gsfonts 8.14+v8.11+urw-0.2 ii gsfonts-other 6.0-3 ii gsfonts-x11 0.17 2. When I do ssh to my university, I am getting: couldn't set locale correctly couldn't set locale correctly couldn't set locale correctly Warning: locale not supported by C library, locale unchanged $ LANG=en_US ssh -f -X [EMAIL PROTECTED] xterm -s $ LANG=en_US.UTF-8 ssh -f -X [EMAIL PROTECTED] xterm $ LANG=en_CA ssh -f -X [EMAIL PROTECTED] xterm -s The only one that seems to work is if I set LANG=C. I have: ii kdessh 3.3.2-1 ii openssh-client 4.2p1-5 ii openssh-server 4.2p1-5 ii ssh4.2p1-5 I should also mention that some packages are yet to be upgraded: $ sudo apt-get -s upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done The following packages have been kept back: abiword-common abiword-gnome cupsys-driver-gimpprint foomatic-db-gimp-print grip ijsgimpprint 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 6 not upgraded. Any idea what is going on here? thanks, -HS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: some changes after upgrading Testing (locale ,gv)
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 02:14:48PM -0400, H.S. wrote: 2. When I do ssh to my university, I am getting: couldn't set locale correctly couldn't set locale correctly couldn't set locale correctly Warning: locale not supported by C library, locale unchanged $ LANG=en_US ssh -f -X [EMAIL PROTECTED] xterm -s $ LANG=en_US.UTF-8 ssh -f -X [EMAIL PROTECTED] xterm $ LANG=en_CA ssh -f -X [EMAIL PROTECTED] xterm -s The only one that seems to work is if I set LANG=C. I have: ii kdessh 3.3.2-1 ii openssh-client 4.2p1-5 ii openssh-server 4.2p1-5 ii ssh4.2p1-5 It isn't clear whether those error messages come from your machine or the university's, but you can try: locale -a to see which locales are currently available. dpkg-reconfigure locales to add the locales you want. I should also mention that some packages are yet to be upgraded: $ sudo apt-get -s upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done The following packages have been kept back: abiword-common abiword-gnome cupsys-driver-gimpprint foomatic-db-gimp-print grip ijsgimpprint 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 6 not upgraded. These don't seem to be related to the problems you mention, but why haven't you upgraded them? -- The world is moving so fast these days that the man who says it can't be done is generally interrupted by someone doing it. -- E. Hubbard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: some changes after upgrading Testing (locale ,gv)
Bill Marcum wrote: It isn't clear whether those error messages come from your machine or the university's, but you can try: locale -a to see which locales are currently available. dpkg-reconfigure locales to add the locales you want. I already tried that. I even tried setting the locales same here at my home machine as the one on the remote machine. The problem didn't go away. BTW, if I set my locale to be en_CA UTF-8, dpkg-reconfigure gives weird characters round the border of the concole screen. Had to reset my locale to en_US (or en_CA) to get rid of the problem. I should also mention that some packages are yet to be upgraded: $ sudo apt-get -s upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done The following packages have been kept back: abiword-common abiword-gnome cupsys-driver-gimpprint foomatic-db-gimp-print grip ijsgimpprint 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 6 not upgraded. These don't seem to be related to the problems you mention, but why haven't you upgraded them? I think it was something to do with the libid3 library. Grip and k3b seem to ask for different ones. Then there seemed to be a problem with cupsys-driver-gimpprint as well. Anyway, I have since put a few packages on hold and upgraded the system. -HS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: hylafax : dépendance avec gv
François TOURDE wrote: Le 12944ième jour après Epoch, [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait: On 10 Jun 2005 at 13:14, François TOURDE wrote: Si tu as installé X avant hylafax, les dépendances de hylafax étaient résolues par X. Maintenant, il faut que tu installes les libs de remplacement (libice6, libsm6, libx11-6, libxext6, libxt6) et éventuellement recommencer le processus avec les autres dépendances. Donc, en installant simplement ces librairies, puis en désinstallant X, apt ne me proposera plus de désinstaller hylafax-server ? Ca serait me plairait bien. (je viens seulement de voir les | dans ton mail, je ne les avaient pas vu sur ma console) Je ne suis pas sûr de ça. A mon avis, les librairies en question entrent en conflit avec xlibs, à moins qu'elles ne soient dedans déjà. Par exemple, si tu fais fermat:~# apt-cache show libxt6 tu as Package: libxt6 [...] Replaces: xlibs ( 4.3.0) [...] A mon avis, le plus simple est de virer X, qui va entrainer la désinstall de hylafax, puis réinstaller hylafax ensuite. Bof, je n'aime pas trop les méthodes install-réinstall ;-) ça me rappelle un autre os où c'était (c'est ?) la règle ;-) En plus, il me réinstallerai les librairie X... alors. Pourquoi te réinstallerai-t-il les librairies X? Tu peux essayer de faire un install de toutes ces libraires, ce qui va entrainer le départ de xlibs, et de tout ce qui y est associé. Fais gaffe quand même. Je viens d'essayer : browser:~# apt-get install libice6 libsm6 libx11-6 libxext6 libxmu6 libxpm4 libxt6 Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait Construction de l'arbre des dépendances... Fait libice6 est déjà la plus récente version disponible. libsm6 est déjà la plus récente version disponible. libx11-6 est déjà la plus récente version disponible. libxext6 est déjà la plus récente version disponible. libxmu6 est déjà la plus récente version disponible. libxpm4 est déjà la plus récente version disponible. libxt6 est déjà la plus récente version disponible. 0 mis à jour, 0 nouvellement installés, 0 à enlever et 0 non mis à jour. et en fait, je viens de m'apercevoir que gv n'était pas installé !? C'est donc un autre paquet (dont dépend hylafax-server) qui nécessite les librairies X, non ? Je continue de chercher... Et quel mal il y a à réinstaller un paquet? Sous l'os auquel tu fais référence, c'est un constat d'échec. Là, c'est plutôt un constat de bonne analyse de la situation, avec choix de la solution la plus simple pour résoudre le conflit. Oui, c'est vrai. D'autant plus que avec cette réinstall, tu devrais préserver les fichiers de conf que tu as déjà mis en place, manip que tu ne maîtrise pas forcément avec l'autre os. mode vendredi En plus, sous Windows (ça y est, je l'ai dit), tu serais obligé de faire 3 ou 4 reboot pendant la manip. Alors que là... si tu reboote c'est que tu es un lamer! ;) ouf... j'ai pas encore rebooté ;-) /mode vendredi Merci. -- Pensez à lire la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Pensez à rajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
file truncation bug in gv 3.5.8???
Hi, I have a printing problem with gv 3.5.8. I am using a Lexmark Optra S 1200 printer with 12mib of ram and lpr under debian with mozilla as a browser. I usually have no problem printing using gv, but I have a file for a 56 page Tyan manual that will only print the first 44 pages. The remaining 12 pages don't print. The strange thing is that when I open the original .pdf file in gv I can see all 56 pages on screen. But when I try to print the file only the first 44 pages will be output. Also, if I try to print the last 12 pages separately, either singly or as a group, nothing prints. ( There is no problem with toner or paper. ) Normally, when you open a .pdf file in gv and then save it to disk the second version has the same number of pages as the original. This is not the case. In the second file only 44 pages are now viewable after the original was saved to disk using gv. Tyan has said the original .pdf file is not corrupted, and the Lexmark printer seems to be functioning normally. Is this a bug in gv v3.5.8?? Hopefully not. Has anyone seen it before? Perhaps it's a configuration problem? Anyway I hope someone can help, tia, bill
Re: file truncation bug in gv 3.5.8???
On Saturday June 11 2005 09:54, Bill wrote: The strange thing is that when I open the original .pdf file in gv I can see all 56 pages on screen. But when I try to print the file only the first 44 pages will be output. Also, if I try to print the last 12 pages separately, either singly or as a group, nothing prints. ( There is no problem with toner or paper. ) Have you tried printing the last 11 pages, omitting the one it fails on? Sometimes, even not corrupted PDF or PS documents are a bit weird, which in my experience sometimes happens with files generated on Windows. Now, don't ask me why, I just know that each and every file that I couldn't print was apparently generated on Windows, I don't know by what program though. The only thing all those files had in common was a pixmap image on the page with the failure. Those files just made my printer crash. The only solution I found was rasterizing the pages in Gimp and then print the image. I think some piece of software has the tendency to produce ever so slightly broken code when being confronted with certain types of graphics. -- Got Backup? Jabber: Shadowdancer at jabber.fsinf.de pgpsGgIDExebT.pgp Description: PGP signature
hylafax : dépendance avec gv
Bonjour, En voulant désinstaller X sur un serveur de fax, je me suis aperçu qu'hylafax- server dépendait de gv, donc de certaines librairies de X. Voyez-vous le pourquoi de cette dépendance ? Comment garder mon serveur fax, sans X window ? (ce qui me paraît plus normal). Merci. -- Bruno
Re: hylafax : dépendance avec gv
Bonjour, c'est cause du systme d'envoie de fax avec conversion en ps ou pdf. Hylafax a le moyen de convertir les documents entrant en ldiff et les convertit en pdf ou ps. C'est un problme en effet, surtout que les outils utiliss ne ncessitent pas X mais ldiff2ps et ps2pdf. Aprs il y a peut tre moyen de faire sans au niveau de la gestion des package. Mais l j'en sais rien maleheureusment. Bonne journe , signature_ecante Edouard Cante, ingnieur dcisionnel [EMAIL PROTECTED] BuyingPack SA Les portes de l'Arbois 1090 rue Ren Descartes - 13857 Aix-en-Provence cedex 3 Tl: 04 42 90 42 80 www.buyingpack.com brunoml a crit: Bonjour, En voulant dsinstaller X sur un serveur de fax, je me suis aperu qu'hylafax- server dpendait de gv, donc de certaines librairies de X. Voyez-vous le pourquoi de cette dpendance ? Comment garder mon serveur fax, sans X window ? (ce qui me parat plus "normal"). Merci.
Re: hylafax : dépendance avec gv
Le Vendredi 10 Juin 2005 12:25, brunoml a écrit : Bonjour, En voulant désinstaller X sur un serveur de fax, je me suis aperçu qu'hylafax- server dépendait de gv, donc de certaines librairies de X. Voyez-vous le pourquoi de cette dépendance ? Comment garder mon serveur fax, sans X window ? (ce qui me paraît plus normal). Comme répondu hier pour un autre sujets, tu peux regarder du côté de equivs, qui te permet de simuler la présence d'un paquet. -- Florent -- Citation aléatoire -- Il n'existe qu'une seule chose au monde plus désuète que l'anticléricalisme : le cléricalisme. -+- Cavanna, François -+- pgpu0LBPwl6c8.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: hylafax : dépendance avec gv
On 10 Jun 2005 at 12:42, Florent Bayle wrote: Le Vendredi 10 Juin 2005 12:25, brunoml a écrit : Bonjour, Bonjour, En voulant désinstaller X sur un serveur de fax, je me suis aperçu qu'hylafax- server dépendait de gv, donc de certaines librairies de X. Voyez-vous le pourquoi de cette dépendance ? Comment garder mon serveur fax, sans X window ? (ce qui me paraît plus normal). Comme répondu hier pour un autre sujets, tu peux regarder du côté de equivs, qui te permet de simuler la présence d'un paquet. Oui, mais, en recoupant avec la réponse d'Edouard Cante, gv servant à la conversion ps-pdf, il reste quand même nécessaire (les fax sont envoyé ensuite par mail). Ce que je ne comprend pas, c'est pourquoi lier à gv plutôt à des outils de conversion en ligne de commande. Je n'arrive pas à croire que tous les serveur de fax Hylafax dispose d'un environnement X seulement pour cette dépendance. Merci tout de même. -- Bruno
Re: hylafax : dépendance avec gv
Le 12944ième jour après Epoch, [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait: Bonjour, En voulant désinstaller X sur un serveur de fax, je me suis aperçu qu'hylafax- server dépendait de gv, donc de certaines librairies de X. Voyez-vous le pourquoi de cette dépendance ? Comment garder mon serveur fax, sans X window ? (ce qui me paraît plus normal). Avec les libs équivalentes hors X... fermat:~# apt-cache show hylafax-server [...] Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-21), libgcc1 (= 1:3.4.1-3), libpam0g (=0.76), libstdc++5 (= 1:3.3.4-1), libtiff4, zlib1g (= 1:1.2.1),libtiff-tools (= 3.6.1-3), hylafax-client (= 1:4.2.1-7), debconf (=1.2.0), mime-codecs, mailx, psmisc, sed (= 4.1.2), awk, gs Le seul truc X serait éventuellement gs (aka gs-gpl) fermat:~# apt-cache show gs-gpl [...] Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-4), libgimpprint1 (= 4.2.7), libice6 | xlibs ( 4.1.0), libjpeg62, libpaper1, libpng12-0 (= 1.2.5.0-4), libsm6 | xlibs ( 4.1.0), libx11-6 | xlibs ( 4.1.0), libxext6 | xlibs ( 4.1.0), libxt6 | xlibs ( 4.1.0), zlib1g (= 1:1.2.1), gs-common (= 0.2) et tu vois qu'il y a des alternatives à xlibs... (syntaxe: pk1 | pk2 | ...) Si tu as installé X avant hylafax, les dépendances de hylafax étaient résolues par X. Maintenant, il faut que tu installes les libs de remplacement (libice6, libsm6, libx11-6, libxext6, libxt6) et éventuellement recommencer le processus avec les autres dépendances. A mon avis, le plus simple est de virer X, qui va entrainer la désinstall de hylafax, puis réinstaller hylafax ensuite. Il doit y avoir plus sioux à mon avis. :) -- Pensez à lire la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Pensez à rajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: hylafax : dépendance avec gv
On 10 Jun 2005 at 13:14, François TOURDE wrote: Le 12944ième jour après Epoch, [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait: Bonjour, En voulant désinstaller X sur un serveur de fax, je me suis aperçu qu'hylafax- server dépendait de gv, donc de certaines librairies de X. Voyez-vous le pourquoi de cette dépendance ? Comment garder mon serveur fax, sans X window ? (ce qui me paraît plus normal). Avec les libs équivalentes hors X... fermat:~# apt-cache show hylafax-server [...] Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-21), libgcc1 (= 1:3.4.1-3), libpam0g (=0.76), libstdc++5 (= 1:3.3.4-1), libtiff4, zlib1g (= 1:1.2.1),libtiff-tools (= 3.6.1-3), hylafax-client (= 1:4.2.1-7), debconf (=1.2.0), mime-codecs, mailx, psmisc, sed (= 4.1.2), awk, gs Le seul truc X serait éventuellement gs (aka gs-gpl) fermat:~# apt-cache show gs-gpl [...] Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-4), libgimpprint1 (= 4.2.7), libice6 | xlibs ( 4.1.0), libjpeg62, libpaper1, libpng12-0 (= 1.2.5.0-4), libsm6 | xlibs ( 4.1.0), libx11-6 | xlibs ( 4.1.0), libxext6 | xlibs ( 4.1.0), libxt6 | xlibs ( 4.1.0), zlib1g (= 1:1.2.1), gs-common (= 0.2) et tu vois qu'il y a des alternatives à xlibs... (syntaxe: pk1 | pk2 | ...) Si tu as installé X avant hylafax, les dépendances de hylafax étaient résolues par X. Maintenant, il faut que tu installes les libs de remplacement (libice6, libsm6, libx11-6, libxext6, libxt6) et éventuellement recommencer le processus avec les autres dépendances. Donc, en installant simplement ces librairies, puis en désinstallant X, apt ne me proposera plus de désinstaller hylafax-server ? Ca serait me plairait bien. (je viens seulement de voir les | dans ton mail, je ne les avaient pas vu sur ma console) A mon avis, le plus simple est de virer X, qui va entrainer la désinstall de hylafax, puis réinstaller hylafax ensuite. Bof, je n'aime pas trop les méthodes install-réinstall ;-) ça me rappelle un autre os où c'était (c'est ?) la règle ;-) En plus, il me réinstallerai les librairie X... alors. Merci.-- Bruno
Re: hylafax : dépendance avec gv
Le 12944ième jour après Epoch, [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait: On 10 Jun 2005 at 13:14, François TOURDE wrote: Si tu as installé X avant hylafax, les dépendances de hylafax étaient résolues par X. Maintenant, il faut que tu installes les libs de remplacement (libice6, libsm6, libx11-6, libxext6, libxt6) et éventuellement recommencer le processus avec les autres dépendances. Donc, en installant simplement ces librairies, puis en désinstallant X, apt ne me proposera plus de désinstaller hylafax-server ? Ca serait me plairait bien. (je viens seulement de voir les | dans ton mail, je ne les avaient pas vu sur ma console) Je ne suis pas sûr de ça. A mon avis, les librairies en question entrent en conflit avec xlibs, à moins qu'elles ne soient dedans déjà. Par exemple, si tu fais fermat:~# apt-cache show libxt6 tu as Package: libxt6 [...] Replaces: xlibs ( 4.3.0) [...] A mon avis, le plus simple est de virer X, qui va entrainer la désinstall de hylafax, puis réinstaller hylafax ensuite. Bof, je n'aime pas trop les méthodes install-réinstall ;-) ça me rappelle un autre os où c'était (c'est ?) la règle ;-) En plus, il me réinstallerai les librairie X... alors. Pourquoi te réinstallerai-t-il les librairies X? Tu peux essayer de faire un install de toutes ces libraires, ce qui va entrainer le départ de xlibs, et de tout ce qui y est associé. Fais gaffe quand même. Et quel mal il y a à réinstaller un paquet? Sous l'os auquel tu fais référence, c'est un constat d'échec. Là, c'est plutôt un constat de bonne analyse de la situation, avec choix de la solution la plus simple pour résoudre le conflit. D'autant plus que avec cette réinstall, tu devrais préserver les fichiers de conf que tu as déjà mis en place, manip que tu ne maîtrise pas forcément avec l'autre os. mode vendredi En plus, sous Windows (ça y est, je l'ai dit), tu serais obligé de faire 3 ou 4 reboot pendant la manip. Alors que là... si tu reboote c'est que tu es un lamer! ;) /mode vendredi -- Pensez à lire la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Pensez à rajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(OT) gv multiple print - square numbers
Has anyone worked out why ghostview prints not the number of prints requested, but the square of that number? I assume it is not just me, because it happens on all my debian systems. I have cups, and sarge and sid boxes. When viewing a ps or pdf in gv, select any print function, add to the small command pop-up window -# 2 and get 4 prints. Add -# 5 and get 25 prints. It is good for your mental arithmetic ('How do I get 13 prints? -- oh, yes, do 3 then 2'), but can be alarming if you forget and order 23 prints... -- richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
emergency: font problems causing gv to crash
Hi all, My PhD dissertation is due in a few weeks and I'm having some kind of problem with fonts that's preventing me from viewing my thesis. This is a new computer (my old one died at the *worst* possible moment. Luckily, I'm *really* good about backing everything up), so it's a fresh Debian/testing installation and I'm trying to iron out bugs as quickly as possible so I can get back to writing. I normally view my thesis using gv, but gv segfaults: $ gv dissertation.ps Warning: Missing charsets in String to FontSet conversion Warning: Unable to load any usable fontset Segmentation fault (core dumped) xdvi also fails to run: $ xdvi dissertation.dvi X Error of failed request: BadValue (integer parameter out of range for operation) Major opcode of failed request: 45 (X_OpenFont) Value in failed request: 0xe4 Serial number of failed request: 27 Current serial number in output stream: 28 xfontsel also seems to have a problem: FreeType: couldn't open face /var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType/ds=y:VeraMono.ttf: 1 On the console behind X, this error message is printed: FreeType: couldn't open face /var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType/ds=y:VeraMono.ttf: 1 But this doesn't look like fatal error to me. I really need to get writing ASAP. Can someone please help? Thanks, Peter -- Every theory is killed sooner or later, but if the theory has good in it, that good is embodied and continued in the next theory. -- Albert Einstein GPG Fingerprint: B9F1 6CF3 47C4 7CD8 D33E 70A9 A3B9 1945 67EA 951D -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: gv plötzlich mit grünem Hintergrund
Am Friday, den 18. March 2005 20:10:18 schrieb Til Schubbe: Das deutet wohl wiederum auf ein Problem meines lokalen X hin!? application-defaults/xresources: xrdb -q, /etc/X11/app-defaults/GV, ~/.Xdefaults, ~/.Xresources, ... MfG bmg -- Des is völlig wurscht, was heut beschlos- | M G Berberich sen wird: I bin sowieso dagegn! | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (SPD-Stadtrat Kurt Schindler; Regensburg) | www.fmi.uni-passau.de/~berberic -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: gv plötzlich mit grünem Hintergrund
* On 17.03. I muttered on debian-user-german@lists.debian.org: * On 17.03. Martin Dickopp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: Findet das alles lokal oder per X-Forwarding durch einen SSH-Tunnel statt? Es läuft alles lokal. Ich habe dasselbe PS mal auf einem anderen Rechner lokal mit gv betrachtet: korrekt mit weißem Hintergrund. Auch auf dem anderen Rechner ist die gleiche Version von gv installiert: $ apt-cache policy gv gv: Installed: 1:3.6.1-9 Wenn ich allerdings auf dem anderen Rechner $DISPLAY auf meinen Rechner lege und dann auf dem anderen gv aufrufe, ist der Hintergrund auf meinem Rechner wieder grün. Auf der anderen Kiste habe ich noch ghostview: $ apt-cache policy ghostview ghostview: Installed: 1.5-28 Wenn ich dessen Ausgabe auf meine Kiste umleite, ist der Hintergrund korrekt weiß. Das deutet wohl wiederum auf ein Problem meines lokalen X hin!? Gruß Til -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: gv plötzlich mit grünem Hintergrund
Til Schubbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: Was nehmt Ihr für Leichtgewichte, um PS-Files anzuschauen? cat? vim? ;-)) Natuerlich gv. Aber das schafft Dir ja Probleme. Wandel doch mal nach PDF um und schau es Dir dann mit xpdf bzw. ebenfalls wiederum gv an. Gruss Peter Blancke -- Hoc est enim verbum meum! -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: gv plötzlich mit grünem Hintergrund
* On 17.03. Peter Blancke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: Til Schubbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: Was nehmt Ihr für Leichtgewichte, um PS-Files anzuschauen? Wandel doch mal nach PDF um und schau es Dir dann mit xpdf bzw. ebenfalls wiederum gv an. Schon probiert. Das PDF wird, wenn ich es mit xpdf anschaue, korrekt mit weißem Hintergrund dargestellt. Wenn ich dasselbe PDF mit gv ansehe, ist der Hintergrund grün. Das aus dem PDF resultierende PS wird, mit gv betrachtet, mit grünem Hintergrund dargestellt. Sowohl das Original-PS, alsauch das PS nach doppelter Wandlung werden von kghostview + gimp mit weißem Hintergrund dargestellt (aus irgendeinem Grund wird dann keine A4-Seite angezeigt, sondern nur noch ein kleineres, gestanztes Rechteck, in dem der Text enthalten ist). [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ - which gv /home/til/bin/gv [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ - cat /home/til/bin/gv #!/bin/sh /usr/bin/gv --media=A4 $* [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ - l /usr/bin/gv -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 266968 2005-02-13 20:44 /usr/bin/gv [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ - dpkg -S /usr/bin/gv gv: /usr/bin/gv [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ - dpkg -l gv |egrep ^i ii gv 3.6.1-9PostScript and PDF viewer for X Wie werd' ich das Grün los? :-| Til -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: gv plötzlich mit grünem Hintergrund
Gruesse! * Til Schubbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [17.03.05 15:22]: Wie werd' ich das Grün los? Probier doch spaßeshalber mal das Original durch ps2ps zu jagen. :-| Til Gruß Gerhard -- Ist Ihnen mutt zu kompliziert? Ihr Mailprogramm zu fett? Sie moegen keine man pages? Versuchen Sie: rm -rf (ReadMail -Realy Fast)
Re: gv pltzlich mit grnem Hintergrund
Til Schubbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ich habe mir gerade ein altes ps-File mit gv angeschaut. Der Hintergrund wird auf einmal grn dargestellt, obwohl er wei war + ist und auch gedruckt wei erscheint. Was steht in den Dateien ~/.Xresources, ~/.Xdefaults und /etc/X11/app-defaults/GV (sofern jeweils vorhanden)? Was gibt das Kommando xrdb -query aus? Was fr ein Grn ist das? (Das bekommst Du z.B. heraus, indem Du mit xmag einen Teil des Bildschirms vergerst und in dem xmag-Fenster dann die linke Maustaste auf einem grnes Pixel gedrckt lt.) Wenn die Lizenz des ps-Files das erlaubt, leg es doch mal auf eine Webseite, so da man es untersuchen kann. Martin
Re: gv plötzlich mit grünem Hintergrund
* On 17.03. Martin Dickopp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: Til Schubbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ich habe mir gerade ein altes ps-File mit gv angeschaut. Der Hintergrund wird auf einmal grün dargestellt, obwohl er weiß war + ist und auch gedruckt weiß erscheint. Was steht in den Dateien ~/.Xresources, ~/.Xdefaults und /etc/X11/app-defaults/GV (sofern jeweils vorhanden)? Die ersten beiden habe ich nicht. Letzteres liegt hier: http://schubbe.org/ps/GV Was gibt das Kommando xrdb -query aus? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ - xrdb -query [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ - Was für ein Grün ist das? 6185,,6185 Wenn die Lizenz des ps-Files das erlaubt, leg es doch mal auf eine Webseite, so daß man es untersuchen kann. Ich glaube zwar eher, daß es an gv oder X liegt, weil in der letzten Zeit alle ps-Files mit gv grün aussehen. Aber hier ist es: http://schubbe.org/ps/1.ps Danke + Gruß Til -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: gv plötzlich mit grünem Hintergrund
* On 17.03. Gerhard Brauer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: * Til Schubbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [17.03.05 15:22]: Wie werd' ich das Grün los? Probier doch spaßeshalber mal das Original durch ps2ps zu jagen. Bleibt grün. Mit kghostview wird wiederum der Bereich mit der Schrift ausgeschnitten. Der Hintergrund in dem übriggebliebenen Rechteck ist aber korrekt weiß. Gruß Til -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: gv plötzlich mit grünem Hintergrund
On 17.Mär 2005 - 20:11:13, Til Schubbe wrote: * On 17.03. Martin Dickopp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: Til Schubbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Die ersten beiden habe ich nicht. Letzteres liegt hier: http://schubbe.org/ps/GV Ist bei mir dasselbe... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ - xrdb -query [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ - Da gibts bei mir allerdings ne ewig lange Ausgabe. Das einzige was mit GV zusammenhaengt ist das Printer-Command... Ich glaube zwar eher, daß es an gv oder X liegt, weil in der letzten Zeit alle ps-Files mit gv grün aussehen. Aber hier ist es: http://schubbe.org/ps/1.ps Wuerde ich auch behaupten wollen, hier ist das PS jedefalls weiss mit abcdefgh drin. Davon abgesehen: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~gv --version gv 3.6.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~apt-cache policy gv gv: *** 1:3.6.1-9 0 990 http://debian unstable/main Packages HTH Andreas -- Tomorrow, you can be anywhere. -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: gv plötzlich mit grünem Hintergrund
* On 17.03. Andreas Pakulat ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: http://schubbe.org/ps/1.ps hier ist das PS jedefalls weiss mit abcdefgh drin. Schön. Auch haben woll! [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~apt-cache policy gv gv: *** 1:3.6.1-9 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ - apt-cache policy gv gv: Installed: 1:3.6.1-9 HTH Nur zur Seelenmassage... Gruß Til -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: gv pltzlich mit grnem Hintergrund
Til Schubbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: * On 17.03. Martin Dickopp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: Til Schubbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ich habe mir gerade ein altes ps-File mit gv angeschaut. Der Hintergrund wird auf einmal grn dargestellt, obwohl er wei war + ist und auch gedruckt wei erscheint. Was steht in den Dateien ~/.Xresources, ~/.Xdefaults und /etc/X11/app-defaults/GV (sofern jeweils vorhanden)? Die ersten beiden habe ich nicht. Hast Du eine Datei ~/.Xdefaults-HOSTNAME (wobei HOSTNAME der Hostname Deines Rechners ist)? Letzteres liegt hier: http://schubbe.org/ps/GV Die hat den gleichen Inhalt wie auf meinem Rechner. Wenn die Lizenz des ps-Files das erlaubt, leg es doch mal auf eine Webseite, so da man es untersuchen kann. Ich glaube zwar eher, da es an gv oder X liegt, Glaube ich auch, aber ich wollte versuchen, ob ich das Problem reproduzieren kann, wenn ich mglich genau das mache, was auch Du gemacht hast. Leider ist mir das nicht gelungen; bei mir ist der Hintergrund wei. Zwei Fragen fallen mir noch ein: Tritt das Problem auch auf, wenn Du das File mit gs statt gv anschaust? Findet das alles lokal oder per X-Forwarding durch einen SSH-Tunnel statt? Gre Martin
Re: gv plötzlich mit grünem Hintergrund
* On 17.03. Martin Dickopp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: Hast Du eine Datei ~/.Xdefaults-HOSTNAME (wobei HOSTNAME der Hostname Deines Rechners ist)? Nee. bei mir ist der Hintergrund weiß. Schön. Vielleicht hängt es bei mir ja mit irgendeinem Update zusammen. Vor ein paar Tagen hab ich jedenfalls allen möglichen X-Kram neu drauf (Sid). Allerdings kann ich das Datum, seit dem ich das grüne gv hab, nicht mehr sicher nachvollziehen. Tritt das Problem auch auf, wenn Du das File mit gs statt gv anschaust? Ja, leider. Findet das alles lokal oder per X-Forwarding durch einen SSH-Tunnel statt? Es läuft alles lokal. Gruß Til -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: gv pltzlich mit grnem Hintergrund
Til Schubbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: * On 17.03. Martin Dickopp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: Tritt das Problem auch auf, wenn Du das File mit gs statt gv anschaust? Ja, leider. Ich frchte, ich kann Dir nicht wirklich helfen. Mein Vorschlag wre, da Du Dir mit strace -e open gs FILENAME mal anschaust, was fr Dateien gs ffnet, und sofern es sich um Konfigurationsdateien handelt, nachschaust, ob Dir an diesen irgendetwas Ungewhnliches auffllt. Auch scheint gs zunchst zu versuchen, alle mglichen internen Files im _aktuellen_ Verzeichnis zu lesen. Mglicherweise stt es dabei auf eine Datei, die gar nicht fr gs gedacht ist. Gre Martin
gv plötzlich mit grünem Hintergrund
Hi, ich habe mir gerade ein altes ps-File mit gv angeschaut. Der Hintergrund wird auf einmal grün dargestellt, obwohl er weiß war + ist und auch gedruckt weiß erscheint. Warum? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ - dpkg -l 'gs*' |egrep ^i ii gs 8.01-5 Transitional package ii gs-common 0.3.7 Common files for different Ghostscript relea ii gs-gpl 8.01-5 The GPL Ghostscript PostScript interpreter ii gsfonts8.14+v8.11-0.1 Fonts for the Ghostscript interpreter(s) ii gsfonts-x110.17 Make Ghostscript fonts available to X11 Gruß Til -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: gv plötzlich mit grünem Hintergrund
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Moin Moin Til Schubbe, *, Til Schubbe wrote on Mar 16, 2005 at 07:23PM +0100: ich habe mir gerade ein altes ps-File mit gv angeschaut. Der Hintergrund wird auf einmal grn dargestellt, obwohl er wei war + ist und auch gedruckt wei erscheint. Vielleicht (ich kenne das FIle nicht, und mich mit ps auch nicht wirklich aus) ist der Hintergrund eben nicht weiss, sondern transparent. Und gv maskiert diese Transparenz eben gruen... - -- - - Rainer Bendig aka Ny | http://www.moins.de | GnuPG-Key 0x41D44F10 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.9.16-cvs (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCOIuJWmkXC0TkjEgRAsgEAJ9Y0VOrTEJuS5F0p9k+kCstqbGV7wCfeXan VoVBxrMmrkw4qLBwUHgXiy8= =Ppc5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: gv plötzlich mit grünem Hintergrund
* On 16.03. Rainer Bendig aka Ny ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: Til Schubbe wrote on Mar 16, 2005 at 07:23PM +0100: ich habe mir gerade ein altes ps-File mit gv angeschaut. Der Hintergrund wird auf einmal grün dargestellt, obwohl er weiß war + ist und auch gedruckt weiß erscheint. Vielleicht (ich kenne das FIle nicht, und mich mit ps auch nicht wirklich aus) ist der Hintergrund eben nicht weiss, sondern transparent. Und gv maskiert diese Transparenz eben gruen... Mal ganz abgesehen von der Frage, was für einen Sinn die grüne Farbe haben sollte: Das Grün nervt. Wie bekomme ich das weiß, so wie es früher bei ghostview war? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ - /usr/bin/gv --version gv 3.6.1 Die manpage und info sind nicht wirklich erhellend und gv weiß offensichtlich selbst nicht so recht, was es kann + was nicht: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ - gv --grayscale 11.ps /usr/bin/gv: unrecognized option `--grayscale' Usage: gv [OPTION]... [FILE] PostScript and PDF viewer. --monochrome display document using only black and white --grayscaledisplay document without colors [...] Was nehmt Ihr für Leichtgewichte, um PS-Files anzuschauen? Gruß Til -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Fehlerhafte PDF-Darstellung mit GV und co.
Hallo, seit ca. einer Woche habe ich Probleme mit der Darstellung und dem Ausdruck einiger PDF-Dateien. Während sie mit dem Acrobat-Reader und auch unter Windows korrekt angezeigt werden, fehlen bei der Darstellung und im Ausdruck mit gv und KGhostView große Teile des Textes und z.T. auch Grafiken. Es tritt allerdings nicht mit allen PDF-Dateien auf und ist auch unabhängig von deren Größe oder Herkunft (z.B. werden einige mit OOo selbst erstellte korrekt angezeigt, andere nicht). Eine Neuinstallation der betreffenden Pakete (incl. der benötigten libs) brachte keine Besserung. Haben andere das Problem auch? Welche Gegenmaßnahmen? (Ich verwende sarge, relativ aktuell - den Fehler kann ich allerdings keinem konkreten Update zuordnen, dafür nutze ich PDF zu unregelmäßig) -- Gruß MaxX Hinweis: PMs an diese Adresse werden automatisch vernichtet (Filter nach /dev/null).
Re: Fehlerhafte PDF-Darstellung mit GV und co.
Am 2004-10-29 08:28:04 schrieb(en) Matthias Houdek: seit ca. einer Woche habe ich Probleme mit der Darstellung und dem Ausdruck einiger PDF-Dateien. Während sie mit dem Acrobat-Reader und auch unter Windows korrekt angezeigt werden, fehlen bei der Darstellung und im Ausdruck mit gv und das selbe problem hab' ich auch schon eine weile. bin auf xpdf umgestiegen, hier scheinen diese probs nicht aufzutauchen. sl ritch. -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: Fehlerhafte PDF-Darstellung mit GV und co.
Am Freitag, 29. Oktober 2004 09:41 schrieb Richard Mittendorfer: Am 2004-10-29 08:28:04 schrieb(en) Matthias Houdek: seit ca. einer Woche habe ich Probleme mit der Darstellung und dem Ausdruck einiger PDF-Dateien. Während sie mit dem Acrobat-Reader und auch unter Windows korrekt angezeigt werden, fehlen bei der Darstellung und im Ausdruck mit gv und das selbe problem hab' ich auch schon eine weile. bin auf xpdf umgestiegen, hier scheinen diese probs nicht aufzutauchen. Jepp, mit xpdf geht es auch. Aber das Programm ist doch eher ... , naja, schweigen wir lieber - kein Index-View, kein Inhaltsverzeichnis, ... -- Gruß MaxX Hinweis: PMs an diese Adresse werden automatisch vernichtet (Filter nach /dev/null).
Re: Fehlerhafte PDF-Darstellung mit GV und co.
Am 2004-10-29 12:39:55 schrieb(en) Matthias Houdek: Am Freitag, 29. Oktober 2004 09:41 schrieb Richard Mittendorfer: Am 2004-10-29 08:28:04 schrieb(en) Matthias Houdek: seit ca. einer Woche habe ich Probleme mit der Darstellung und dem Ausdruck einiger PDF-Dateien. Während sie mit dem Acrobat-Reader und auch unter Windows korrekt angezeigt werden, fehlen bei der Darstellung und im Ausdruck mit gv und das selbe problem hab' ich auch schon eine weile. bin auf xpdf umgestiegen, hier scheinen diese probs nicht aufzutauchen. Jepp, mit xpdf geht es auch. Aber das Programm ist doch eher ... , naja, schweigen wir lieber - kein Index-View, kein Inhaltsverzeichnis, ... ...aber doelt so schnell... ;) nachdem ich ein solches (problematisches) pdf gerade hier habe, versuchte ich etwas debugging, aber ggv lässt sich nicht überreden diesbezüglich auch nur eine zeile info auszuspucken. der gnome-pdf-viewer schafft die richtige darstellung ebenfalls, da er aber auf xpdf basiert hat er auch kein inh-verz. wie ich sehe ist ggv ja auch ein postscript-viewer und scheint das dokument nicht richtig umzuwandeln: /usr/bin/gs -q -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -dSAFER -dQUIET -sDEVICE=pswrite - sOutputFile=%s -c save pop -f %s ich schätze mal, dass hier der hund begraben ist ..nur hab ich momentan keinen nerv die ghostscript optionen in ordnung zu bringen. da ich keinen kde inst. hab, kenn ich KGhostView nicht, aber der vorgang dörfte hier ähnlich sein. sl ritch. -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: Fehlerhafte PDF-Darstellung mit GV und co.
Am Freitag, 29. Oktober 2004 14:18 schrieb Richard Mittendorfer: Am 2004-10-29 12:39:55 schrieb(en) Matthias Houdek: Am Freitag, 29. Oktober 2004 09:41 schrieb Richard Mittendorfer: Am 2004-10-29 08:28:04 schrieb(en) Matthias Houdek: seit ca. einer Woche habe ich Probleme mit der Darstellung und dem Ausdruck einiger PDF-Dateien. Während sie mit dem Acrobat-Reader und auch unter Windows korrekt angezeigt werden, fehlen bei der Darstellung und im Ausdruck mit gv und das selbe problem hab' ich auch schon eine weile. bin auf xpdf umgestiegen, hier scheinen diese probs nicht aufzutauchen. Jepp, mit xpdf geht es auch. Aber das Programm ist doch eher ... , naja, schweigen wir lieber - kein Index-View, kein Inhaltsverzeichnis, ... ...aber doelt so schnell... ;) nachdem ich ein solches (problematisches) pdf gerade hier habe, versuchte ich etwas debugging, aber ggv lässt sich nicht überreden diesbezüglich auch nur eine zeile info auszuspucken. der gnome-pdf-viewer schafft die richtige darstellung ebenfalls, da er aber auf xpdf basiert hat er auch kein inh-verz. wie ich sehe ist ggv ja auch ein postscript-viewer und scheint das dokument nicht richtig umzuwandeln: /usr/bin/gs -q -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -dSAFER -dQUIET -sDEVICE=pswrite - sOutputFile=%s -c save pop -f %s ich schätze mal, dass hier der hund begraben ist .. Ja, denn ausgedruckt wird ja auch nicht ordentlich. nur hab ich momentan keinen nerv die ghostscript optionen in ordnung zu bringen. da ich keinen kde inst. hab, kenn ich KGhostView nicht, aber der vorgang dörfte hier ähnlich sein. KGhostView basiert auf gv. -- Gruß MaxX Hinweis: PMs an diese Adresse werden automatisch vernichtet (Filter nach /dev/null).
gv artik segmentation fault veriyor
Title: gv artik segmentation fault veriyor gv (ghostview) eski sisteminde (Woody 3.0, stable) sorunsuz calisiyordu. Sistemi komple unstable'a yükselttikten sonra calismadi, hata verdim, dedim son sürümünü cekeyim, belki geri kalmistir filan ancak apt-get install ile son sürümü cektigim halde ayni hatalari aliyorum: - [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gv Warning: Representation size 4 must match superclass's to override highlightedBackground Warning: Unsupported shape style for Command widget toggleCurrent Warning: Unsupported shape style for Command widget toggleEven Warning: Unsupported shape style for Command widget toggleOdd Warning: Unsupported shape style for Command widget unmarkAll Warning: Unsupported shape style for Command widget autoResize Warning: Representation size 2 must match superclass's to override internalWidth Segmentation fault - Bir dosya parametresi filan verdigimde de ayni hatalari veriyor. Isin icinden cikamadim. Bu yüzden istemedigim halde kghostview kurmak zorunda kaldim. gv ile ilgili bir önerisi olan var mi acaba?
Re: gv artik segmentation fault veriyor
* Emre Sevinc [2004-09-30 01:04:12+0300] gv (ghostview) eski sisteminde (Woody 3.0, stable) sorunsuz calisiyordu. Sistemi komple unstable'a yükselttikten sonra calismadi, hata verdim, dedim son sürümünü cekeyim, belki geri kalmistir filan ancak apt-get install ile son sürümü cektigim halde ayni hatalari aliyorum: - [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gv Warning: Representation size 4 must match superclass's to override highlightedBackground Warning: Unsupported shape style for Command widget toggleCurrent Warning: Unsupported shape style for Command widget toggleEven Warning: Unsupported shape style for Command widget toggleOdd Warning: Unsupported shape style for Command widget unmarkAll Warning: Unsupported shape style for Command widget autoResize Warning: Representation size 2 must match superclass's to override internalWidth Segmentation fault - Bir dosya parametresi filan verdigimde de ayni hatalari veriyor. Isin icinden cikamadim. Bu yüzden istemedigim halde kghostview kurmak zorunda kaldim. gv ile ilgili bir önerisi olan var mi acaba? Su hata olabilir mi? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=212174 Fakat yeni surumlerde bu hata cozulmus gorunuyor. 'xaw3dg' paketi ne durumda, bunu da yukseltmeyi dene istersen. -- roktas
RE: gv artik segmentation fault veriyor
Title: RE: gv artik segmentation fault veriyor Cok acayip bir durum sanirim. Dedigin üzere xaw3dg paketini bir kurcalayayim dedim: --- debian:/home/fz# apt-get install xaw3dg Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done xaw3dg is already the newest version. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 82 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. . . . -- E zaten son sürümmüs dedim, tekrar gv yazdim, bir de ne göreyim, calisti! Mesele $u ki: root kullanici olarak gv calisiyor, normal kullanici olarak calistirmaya kalktigimda patliyor! Son kesfettigim durum bu yani :O Sebebi ne olabilir? Emre S. -Original Message- From: Recai Oktas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thu 9/30/2004 1:38 AM To: debian-user-turkish@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: gv artik segmentation fault veriyor * Emre Sevinc [2004-09-30 01:04:12+0300] gv (ghostview) eski sisteminde (Woody 3.0, stable) sorunsuz calisiyordu. Sistemi komple unstable'a yükselttikten sonra calismadi, hata verdim, dedim son sürümünü cekeyim, belki geri kalmistir filan ancak apt-get install ile son sürümü cektigim halde ayni hatalari aliyorum: - [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gv Warning: Representation size 4 must match superclass's to override highlightedBackground Warning: Unsupported shape style for Command widget toggleCurrent Warning: Unsupported shape style for Command widget toggleEven Warning: Unsupported shape style for Command widget toggleOdd Warning: Unsupported shape style for Command widget unmarkAll Warning: Unsupported shape style for Command widget autoResize Warning: Representation size 2 must match superclass's to override internalWidth Segmentation fault - Bir dosya parametresi filan verdigimde de ayni hatalari veriyor. Isin icinden cikamadim. Bu yüzden istemedigim halde kghostview kurmak zorunda kaldim. gv ile ilgili bir önerisi olan var mi acaba? Su hata olabilir mi? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=212174 Fakat yeni surumlerde bu hata cozulmus gorunuyor. 'xaw3dg' paketi ne durumda, bunu da yukseltmeyi dene istersen. -- roktas
Re: a2ps - gv font (deeper problem!)
On Tue, 07 Sep 2004, Emil wrote: I had the same problem while using gsfonts_8.14+urwcyr1.0.7pre35-1_all.deb I've downgraded to gsfonts_8.14-3_all.deb and the problem disappeared. That was indeed the problem. Thanks! FWIW, there are a couple of bug reports filed (by others) against the newest gsfonts that cover this problem (2-3 weeks old now). Hopefully things will be fixed soon. -- Brad -- Brad Sawatzky [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Virginia Physics Department Ph: (434) 924-6580Fax: (434) 924-7909 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: a2ps - gv font (deeper problem!)
I had the same problem while using gsfonts_8.14+urwcyr1.0.7pre35-1_all.deb I've downgraded to gsfonts_8.14-3_all.deb and the problem disappeared. Regards, Emil. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]