Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-28 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Lu, 28 mai 12, 02:21:39, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:

[snip]

Must read: http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/
(or as package debian-reference)

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-27 Thread Tom H
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Andrei POPESCU
andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Vi, 25 mai 12, 15:36:40, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
 On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 18:28 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:

 In conclusion i found out that i should stick to stable and should not
 play with the source list until unless it is necessary. even if i add
 a repo then  i must comment it after installing the whatever package

 Yesno. I'll say yes, somebody else might recommend
 http://jaqque.sbih.org/kplug/apt-pinning.html

 That article, while still useful,

 - mentions non-US which has been discontinued long time ago (sarge?)
 - uses sources + pinning by release not code-name[1]

 [1] this may be due to a bug in apt where pinning by codename was not
 possible, fixed in the meantime (lenny?).

 I seem to remember the Debian Reference has a good guide to pinning and
 it is up-to-date (thanks to Osamu Aoki).

I remember but I can't find a confirmation via google that apt-get has
been patched so that, if you're running stable, apt-get
package/testing now meets dependencies from testing just like
apt-get -t testing package does (which contradicts the url above).
Can anyone confirm or infirm this?


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=SxG33vYkYiomRycpKQu6pTZXJKVwoBLo„jx0gyjy...@mail.gmail.com



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-27 Thread Muhammad Yousuf Khan
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Saturday 26 May 2012 18:04:35 Andrei POPESCU wrote:
 I seem to remember the Debian Reference has a good guide to pinning and
 it is up-to-date (thanks to Osamu Aoki).

 Given the OP's confusion, and the fact that he states his main aim as not
 crashing, would he not do better to stick to pure Squeeze for now?

 Hopefully, more use of Linux will enable him to stop trying to mimic Windows -
 a job which Windows itself does rather well ;-)

true :-)


 Lisi


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201205261839.42048.lisi.re...@gmail.com



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMn=D6FyArU1Ha6OWC0C=tLDq-2EPH=G09=a28uti1u...@mail.gmail.com



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-27 Thread Muhammad Yousuf Khan
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Saturday 26 May 2012 12:43:45 you wrote:
  I prefer to use aptitude full-upgrade routinely - but I have the code
  name in my sources.list, not stable or testing.  I then change the code
  name when I want to get the more recent version.  So, Squeeze not stable,
  Muhammad.  you could get in quite a mess at the changeover point from
  Squeeze to Wheezy if you have stable in your sources.list, as several
  people have pointed out.

 if i use Squeeze (the code name) instead stable, sid or anything.
 should i not to worry about system crash? is it what people here mean
 to say (who support code name squeeze ) that if i apt-get
 upgrade/full-upgrade/safe-upgrade will not crash my system if using
 squeeze. because what i am worried about  here is system crash.

 I'm afraid that I don't understand you. Why should you have a system crash?

I'm afraid that I don't understand you. Why should you have a system crash?

i know my question regarding comparing Windows and Linux a bit
annoying, but i had bad experiences with upgrading windows from one
version to another one. and in linux i just run the command ap-get
upgrade and after few minutes i was working in wheezy regardless of
sid or testing (so the simplicity of the process left me very
confuse). i know how patches and service packs in
windows can turn people's life to nightmare. actually i am the only
resource in system and network in my company and i am the only one who
is motivating management to shift to linux. so i am a bit scared.
because this is new world to me.

however i learn too much from this thread and from this mailing list.
i am thankful to everyone for sharing your views/thoughts/suggestions
. i know  remaining confusions will be clears after getting use to
with linux.

Thanks



 And what are you trying to achieve?

 Always use code names, and incidentally Sid is the code-name for unstable, a
 code-name which never changes.

 So choose which you want.  From the sound of things you want Squeeze.  Install
 Squeeze.  Check that Squeeze is in your sources.list, and only Squeeze at
 this stage.  No mention of stable or anything else.  Update Squeeze.
 (aptitude update followed by aptitude full-upgrade or aptitude safe-upgrade.)
 From then on you will only basically get security updates, though there are
 periodic point releases for Squeeze to iron out some remaining bugs etc.

 For now, and while you bed down with Debian/Linux, simply ignore all mentions
 of Wheezy, stable, Sid, unstable, testing etc.  Time enough to come to terms
 with those when you understand fully what is going on or when Wheezy has
 become Stable and Squeeze is Old Stable.

 apt is now preferred to aptitude by many on this list, but I am more familiar
 with aptitude, and might have got the commands slightly wrong had I attempted
 to give you them.  (I did last time that I did so.)  But for what you are
 doing now, either is fine, and when it comes to upgrading to a new release,
 the release notes will tell you which to use.

 But above all, keep things simple for now.  And when you ask a question, try
 to express it without reference to Windows.  Many of us do not use Windows,
 and in my case I have not done so since Windows 98, which I don't remember
 very well.

 HTH
 Lisi


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201205261517.08770.lisi.re...@gmail.com



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMmnt=secmo8vujuagi8qft6co5iptpj_ee-9krrrm4...@mail.gmail.com



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-27 Thread Lisi
On Sunday 27 May 2012 22:21:39 you wrote:
 On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
  On Saturday 26 May 2012 12:43:45 you wrote:
   I prefer to use aptitude full-upgrade routinely - but I have the code
   name in my sources.list, not stable or testing.  I then change the
   code name when I want to get the more recent version.  So, Squeeze not
   stable, Muhammad.  you could get in quite a mess at the changeover
   point from Squeeze to Wheezy if you have stable in your sources.list,
   as several people have pointed out.
 
  if i use Squeeze (the code name) instead stable, sid or anything.
  should i not to worry about system crash? is it what people here mean
  to say (who support code name squeeze ) that if i apt-get
  upgrade/full-upgrade/safe-upgrade will not crash my system if using
  squeeze. because what i am worried about  here is system crash.
 
  I'm afraid that I don't understand you. Why should you have a system
  crash?


 i know my question regarding comparing Windows and Linux a bit
 annoying,

No, it is not annoying - merely somewhat difficult to follow.  Here, we have 
been an all-Unix house for some years.  We were all-Linux until recently, but 
my granddaughter has a new laptop, which is a Mac with OSX, so still Unix.  
So I am not very au fait with Windows problems.

 but i had bad experiences with upgrading windows from one 
 version to another one. and in linux i just run the command ap-get
 upgrade and after few minutes i was working in wheezy regardless of
 sid or testing (so the simplicity of the process left me very
 confuse). i know how patches and service packs in
 windows can turn people's life to nightmare. actually i am the only
 resource in system and network in my company and i am the only one who
 is motivating management to shift to linux. so i am a bit scared.
 because this is new world to me.

Your description of life under Windows shows why many of us simply don't use 
Windows.

In your shoes most of us would be scared.  Well, I certainly would be.  It's a 
huge responsibility, and the buck stops with you!

 however i learn too much from this thread and from this mailing list.
 i am thankful to everyone for sharing your views/thoughts/suggestions
 . i know  remaining confusions will be clears after getting use to
 with linux.

Just ask whenever there is something you don't understand.  One of the 
beauties of this list is that it is a) large and b) worldwide.  So, what with 
all the different time zones there is always someone around.  

And yes, you will soon get used to Linux.  But from what you say, I really 
would stick to Squeeze for now, provided that it is OK on your hardware.  Get 
it going rock-solid and you will soon win converts.  Time enough to fly in 
the rarefied regions of pinning and mixed systems when you have really found 
your feet.

Good luck!
Lisi


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201205272257.19822.lisi.re...@gmail.com



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-26 Thread Muhammad Yousuf Khan
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Friday 25 May 2012 18:23:37 Tom H wrote:
 On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Mika Suomalainen

 mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com wrote:
  On 25.05.2012 15:49, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
  On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 17:37 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
  deb http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main
  deb-src http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main
  deb http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports squeeze-backports main
  deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sid main
 
  You're issue is related to the sid repository. If you need something
  from sid, then uncomment it and after that comment it. Don't feel secure
  using pinning.
 
  You can name the repositories stable instead of squeeze, so it will
  use stable what ever Debian stable is named.
 
  Is it safe to use stable instead of squeeze? Are there usually any
  conflicts or anything what would need full-upgrade whenever new
  stable is named?

 No.

 No need for aptitude full-upgrade, even apt-get upgrade/aptitude
 safe-upgrade will pull in wheezy (partially) when it becomes
 stable.

 I prefer to use aptitude full-upgrade routinely - but I have the code name in
 my sources.list, not stable or testing.  I then change the code name when I
 want to get the more recent version.  So, Squeeze not stable, Muhammad.  you
 could get in quite a mess at the changeover point from Squeeze to Wheezy if
 you have stable in your sources.list, as several people have pointed out.

if i use Squeeze (the code name) instead stable, sid or anything.
should i not to worry about system crash? is it what people here mean
to say (who support code name squeeze ) that if i apt-get
upgrade/full-upgrade/safe-upgrade will not crash my system if using
squeeze. because what i am worried about  here is system crash.


 I can't comment on your Windows analogies as I don't use Windows.  I think
 that you need to expect that Linux will be different from whatever you used
 in Windows.  They are very different OSs.

 FWIW, I do most of my admin from the CLI, including updating and upgrading.
 So yes, it can be done from the CLI.

 Lisi


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201205252130.54213.lisi.re...@gmail.com



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfM=s3FrC=yzgk+d3bvg7jm64kks_p_xvcy8mcfogj6v...@mail.gmail.com



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-26 Thread Muhammad Yousuf Khan
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
 On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 18:28 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
 In conclusion i found out that i should stick to stable and should not
 play with the source list until unless it is necessary. even if i add
 a repo then  i must comment it after installing the whatever package

 Yesno. I'll say yes, somebody else might recommend
 http://jaqque.sbih.org/kplug/apt-pinning.html

i was reading this article and it is very helpful and something new
that i learned but i am a bit confuse. how come i be safe in this
technique because what this article is saying means if i wanted to
install a specific package this would be helpful and if the package is
not in the stable then apt will check in testing and finally in sid.
but what if i run apt-get upgrade then my question is, would it be
safe and will not upgrade my OS to sid or testing.

 Do you need src? Src repos provide source code only. You might need
 headers to compile src codes from sourceforge etc., but seldom a Debian
 src. Google if there is a stable stable-updates repository etc. too.


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1337953000.2251.114.camel@precise



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMnk2aSYbnfBQFgdowYOowmyRymrG5=q6qcelism_gm...@mail.gmail.com



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-26 Thread keith
On Sat, 26 May 2012 16:43:45 +0500
Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote:

 if i use Squeeze (the code name) instead stable, sid or anything.
 should i not to worry about system crash? is it what people here mean
 to say (who support code name squeeze ) that if i apt-get
 upgrade/full-upgrade/safe-upgrade will not crash my system if using
 squeeze. because what i am worried about  here is system crash.

I can see you are getting confused; best practice suggests using the stable 
dist by name.(Currently Squeeze)

When you want to upgrade to the next stable version, replace squeeze with 
wheezy, in your /etc/apt/sources.list.

~~

My sources.list on a clean installation of Debian Squeeze 6.0.5, with the 
addition of non-free

deb http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main contrib non-free
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main contrib non-free
deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ squeeze main contrib non-free
deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ squeeze main contrib non-free

-- 
keith km3...@gmail.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120526132531.a457ef470c1325f297b2e...@gmail.com



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-26 Thread keith
On Sat, 26 May 2012 17:06:04 +0500
Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote:
 i was reading this article and it is very helpful and something new
 that i learned but i am a bit confuse. how come i be safe in this
 technique because what this article is saying means if i wanted to
 install a specific package this would be helpful and if the package is
 not in the stable then apt will check in testing and finally in sid.
 but what if i run apt-get upgrade then my question is, would it be
 safe and will not upgrade my OS to sid or testing.

When I upgraded squeeze to wheezy, i did -

apt-get update; apt-get upgrade; apt-get dist-upgrade

My understanding is -

If you apt-get upgrade, you are updating your system (squeeze)

When you use apt-get dist-upgrade you change your system from squeeze to wheezy

If you install a package from wheezy/sid  it won't be upgraded until the 
version number is reached in the stable (i.e. squeeze) version.

-- 
keith km3...@gmail.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120526133926.85c6d542d64ad10f386a5...@gmail.com



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-26 Thread Joe
On Sat, 26 May 2012 16:43:45 +0500
Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote:

 
 if i use Squeeze (the code name) instead stable, sid or anything.
 should i not to worry about system crash? is it what people here mean
 to say (who support code name squeeze ) that if i apt-get
 upgrade/full-upgrade/safe-upgrade will not crash my system if using
 squeeze. because what i am worried about  here is system crash.
 

Usually when a version of Stable is upgraded to the next, there will be
some things to do manually. If you have any software installed by other
means than the apt system, or from other repositories than the
official Debian ones, then that will need to be upgraded by hand, or
maybe even removed if that software is now available in the new version.
There may be some applications whose configuration files have changed
significantly, and cannot be automatically upgraded. There may be some
applications on hold, where you did not want them kept up to date even
at the risk of security bugs. Such holds must be released before
upgrading. So you don't want a version upgrade to happen without
preparation, and certainly not automatically on the day of the new
release.

It's a bit like automatic updates in Windows: you wouldn't enable that
on a server, you would want to check first and approve updates (and
possibly wait a week to see who else has problems..). If you are
installing a service pack, this is especially true, and a Debian
version upgrade is broadly similar to an MS service pack.

So if you use the codename of the distribution, the version upgrade
will not happen automatically, and this is generally what you want.
After the new version is released, you can take up to a year to prepare
for the upgrade, and carry it out at a time of your own choosing.

If you use the Stable distribution, with no apt sources other than the
official Debian ones, and use the codename in your sources list, you
should never expect to see any system disturbance. When you make the
upgrade to the next version, you shouldn't expect to see any problems
which have not been mentioned in the release notes for the upgrade.

As to which upgrade to use routinely, it's not too important in Stable.
Nothing should be removed under normal conditions, so aptitude
safe-upgrade or apt-get upgrade should have the same effect as aptitude
full-upgrade or apt-get dist-upgrade. The apt-get and aptitude actions
are not absolutely identical, but very similar for routine upgrades, the
differences are in how dependencies are handled. Routine upgrades of
the Stable distribution do not normally involve any dependency changes.
The release notes for a version upgrade will normally advise which of
the two systems is preferred for the upgrade (e.g. apt-get for squeeze,
aptitude for lenny).

If you choose to run sid, the Unstable distribution, on a workstation,
you will learn Debian a little bit quicker, but you should expect
problems. You will need to look at upgrades before carrying them out,
as routine upgrades applied without thinking can damage sid, and this
happens once or twice a year. Much more often than that, sid will
ask if you want half of your desktop environment removed, and it's
usually safer to say no. There are typically 20-50 packages upgraded per
day in an 'average' sid system, and at any time there are two or three
needing upgrades but with problems preventing it happening.

-- 
Joe


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120526134351.26661...@jretrading.com



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-26 Thread Lisi
On Saturday 26 May 2012 12:43:45 you wrote:
  I prefer to use aptitude full-upgrade routinely - but I have the code
  name in my sources.list, not stable or testing.  I then change the code
  name when I want to get the more recent version.  So, Squeeze not stable,
  Muhammad.  you could get in quite a mess at the changeover point from
  Squeeze to Wheezy if you have stable in your sources.list, as several
  people have pointed out.

 if i use Squeeze (the code name) instead stable, sid or anything.
 should i not to worry about system crash? is it what people here mean
 to say (who support code name squeeze ) that if i apt-get
 upgrade/full-upgrade/safe-upgrade will not crash my system if using
 squeeze. because what i am worried about  here is system crash.

I'm afraid that I don't understand you. Why should you have a system crash?  
And what are you trying to achieve?

Always use code names, and incidentally Sid is the code-name for unstable, a 
code-name which never changes.

So choose which you want.  From the sound of things you want Squeeze.  Install 
Squeeze.  Check that Squeeze is in your sources.list, and only Squeeze at 
this stage.  No mention of stable or anything else.  Update Squeeze.  
(aptitude update followed by aptitude full-upgrade or aptitude safe-upgrade.) 
From then on you will only basically get security updates, though there are 
periodic point releases for Squeeze to iron out some remaining bugs etc.

For now, and while you bed down with Debian/Linux, simply ignore all mentions 
of Wheezy, stable, Sid, unstable, testing etc.  Time enough to come to terms 
with those when you understand fully what is going on or when Wheezy has 
become Stable and Squeeze is Old Stable.

apt is now preferred to aptitude by many on this list, but I am more familiar 
with aptitude, and might have got the commands slightly wrong had I attempted 
to give you them.  (I did last time that I did so.)  But for what you are 
doing now, either is fine, and when it comes to upgrading to a new release, 
the release notes will tell you which to use.

But above all, keep things simple for now.  And when you ask a question, try 
to express it without reference to Windows.  Many of us do not use Windows, 
and in my case I have not done so since Windows 98, which I don't remember 
very well.

HTH
Lisi


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201205261517.08770.lisi.re...@gmail.com



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-26 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Sb, 26 mai 12, 13:39:26, keith wrote:
 
 My understanding is -
 
 If you apt-get upgrade, you are updating your system (squeeze)
 
 When you use apt-get dist-upgrade you change your system from squeeze to 
 wheezy

No, see 'man apt-get' for the difference between the two.

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-26 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Vi, 25 mai 12, 15:36:40, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
 On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 18:28 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
  In conclusion i found out that i should stick to stable and should not
  play with the source list until unless it is necessary. even if i add
  a repo then  i must comment it after installing the whatever package
 
 Yesno. I'll say yes, somebody else might recommend
 http://jaqque.sbih.org/kplug/apt-pinning.html

That article, while still useful,

- mentions non-US which has been discontinued long time ago (sarge?)
- uses sources + pinning by release not code-name[1]

[1] this may be due to a bug in apt where pinning by codename was not 
possible, fixed in the meantime (lenny?).

I seem to remember the Debian Reference has a good guide to pinning and 
it is up-to-date (thanks to Osamu Aoki).

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-26 Thread Lisi
On Saturday 26 May 2012 18:04:35 Andrei POPESCU wrote:
 I seem to remember the Debian Reference has a good guide to pinning and
 it is up-to-date (thanks to Osamu Aoki).

Given the OP's confusion, and the fact that he states his main aim as not 
crashing, would he not do better to stick to pure Squeeze for now?  

Hopefully, more use of Linux will enable him to stop trying to mimic Windows - 
a job which Windows itself does rather well ;-)

Lisi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201205261839.42048.lisi.re...@gmail.com



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-26 Thread Ralf Mardorf
FWIW, sometime ago this book was announced here:
http://debian-handbook.info/browse/stable/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1338053740.2316.0.camel@precise



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-26 Thread keith
On Sat, 26 May 2012 19:57:19 +0300
Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sb, 26 mai 12, 13:39:26, keith wrote:
  
  My understanding is -
  
  If you apt-get upgrade, you are updating your system (squeeze)
  
  When you use apt-get dist-upgrade you change your system from squeeze to 
  wheezy
 
 No, see 'man apt-get' for the difference between the two.
 
 Kind regards,
 Andrei
 -- 
 Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic

I was wrong about dist-upgrade, as has been pointed out above.

(Sorry for the bum steer; but when I 'changed' from squeeze to wheezy I did use 
it.)

-- 
keith km3...@gmail.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120526191958.1a27c85fd316a03b7c8ca...@gmail.com



how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Muhammad Yousuf Khan
well, I have questions about upgrading Linux. since i have been using
Microsoft for years the concept of upgrade I think is different from
Linux upgrade.

in a testing environment I was trying to upgrade the security patches
and I run the command
apt-get upgrade.
It ran fine, but at the end it upgraded my whole OS, first my test
machine was showing Debian version 6.0.4 now after the upgrade it
shifted to Wheezy/SID which I think is unstable.

In Microsoft when we upgrade  the OS. it downloads only the security
and OS patches.

So the question are

1. how to upgrade only the security patches?
2. if the upgrade patch trigger any critical issue. Like any service
like hosting, filesharing or squid got effected by the update, how
come we know which patch cause this problem and how to remove that
specific patch because in Microsoft I have seen that security patches
and OS patches some time make problems when run along with ongoing
services.

3. how to revert back to old OS, for example, in my case i upgraded my
system from 6.0.4 to Wheezy/SID now want to revert things back.

Thanks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmmuhv5e8frlde1e8_awkq34k8tte9rjtdcz2dhrvrf...@mail.gmail.com



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Ralf Mardorf
PS:

I like Synaptic, a GUI for the package management. It automatically set
up an upgrade history. You manually can set up a history when using apt,
however, Synaptic is very comfortable.

A history provides information this way:
package_name (1.11.4) to 1.12.0

Note, for the standard repository 1.11.4 is replaced by 1.12.0 too, so
you can't simply downgrade using the same repository. You need another
repository or to keep packages.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1337946438.2251.82.camel@precise



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 15:57 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
 3. how to revert back to old OS, for example, in my case i upgraded my
 system from 6.0.4 to Wheezy/SID now want to revert things back.

If your repositories are explicit for stable, than there shouldn't
happen an upgrade to testing or unstable.

To restore your Debian stable in the future, IMO the easiest way is to
do a backup before upgrading and to restore from such a backup if
needed.

You can backup any Linux from another Linux, e.g. from a live media, if
you're root and run

cd /path/to/debian_stable
tar czf backup_name.tar.gz *

Globbing (here using *) and following links shouldn't be an issue for
your setup. And IMO having several backups/snapshots is more safe than
syncing backups. Btw. some dirs can be excluded, but IMO this makes a
backup unneeded complicated.

- Ralf





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1337945545.2251.74.camel@precise



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread rjc
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:57:28AM BST, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
 well, I have questions about upgrading Linux. since i have been using
 Microsoft for years the concept of upgrade I think is different from
 Linux upgrade.
 
 in a testing environment I was trying to upgrade the security patches
 and I run the command
 apt-get upgrade.
 It ran fine, but at the end it upgraded my whole OS, first my test
 machine was showing Debian version 6.0.4 now after the upgrade it
 shifted to Wheezy/SID which I think is unstable.

Read below [0].

 In Microsoft when we upgrade  the OS. it downloads only the security
 and OS patches.
 
 So the question are
 
 1. how to upgrade only the security patches?

aptitude update  aptitude safe-upgrade [1]

 2. if the upgrade patch trigger any critical issue. Like any service
 like hosting, filesharing or squid got effected by the update, how
 come we know which patch cause this problem and how to remove that
 specific patch because in Microsoft I have seen that security patches
 and OS patches some time make problems when run along with ongoing
 services.

There are no patches like in Windows. Patches in free (open source)
software are for source code [2].

Upgrading a package you effectively installing a new version of the
software.

 3. how to revert back to old OS, for example, in my case i upgraded my
 system from 6.0.4 to Wheezy/SID now want to revert things back.

You can always install an older version of the package.

[0] It seems like you had several entries in your sources.list file(s)
- post the content of your file here.

[1] safe-upgrade will only upgrade packages and won't remove any other
ones

[2] yes, I know, you can have binary patches as well

Cheers,
-- 
rjc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120525115409.ga13...@linuxstuff.pl



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 03:57:28PM +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
 in a testing environment I was trying to upgrade the security patches
 and I run the command
 apt-get upgrade.
 It ran fine, but at the end it upgraded my whole OS, first my test
 machine was showing Debian version 6.0.4 now after the upgrade it
 shifted to Wheezy/SID which I think is unstable.
 
 In Microsoft when we upgrade  the OS. it downloads only the security
 and OS patches.
 
 So the question are
 
 1. how to upgrade only the security patches?

If security is your concern, you ought to be running stable as
opposed to testing. If you run stable, then ensuring that
security.debian.org is listed in the /etc/apt/sources.list will fetch
security updates.

 2. if the upgrade patch trigger any critical issue. Like any service
 like hosting, filesharing or squid got effected by the update, how
 come we know which patch cause this problem and how to remove that
 specific patch because in Microsoft I have seen that security patches
 and OS patches some time make problems when run along with ongoing
 services.

I'd advise you to subscribe to the security mailing list of the
projects which you run on your machine whose security issues you are
concerned about.

Read this for further details and ideas: http://www.debian.org/security/

 3. how to revert back to old OS, for example, in my case i upgraded my
 system from 6.0.4 to Wheezy/SID now want to revert things back.

This is a little complicated and one could end up hosing one's
system. I'd advise you to back up things and do a fresh install of
squeeze.

HTH.

Kumar
-- 
We use Linux for all our mission-critical applications.  Having the source code
means that we are not held hostage by anyone's support department.
-- Russell Nelson, President of Crynwr Software


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120525114253.gb5...@bluemoon.alumni.iitm.ac.in



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 06:42 -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
 I'd advise you to back up things and do a fresh install of
 squeeze.

things for your current install might be /home only. Perhaps xorg.conf
and some other files, using cp -pr while you're root. But in the future
completely backup using e.g. tar. Note, if you sync, you anyway might
lose data, since you might notice some issues after doing several
backups and not already with the backup that did cause an issue.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1337948255.2251.89.camel@precise



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Muhammad Yousuf Khan
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
 On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 15:57 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
 3. how to revert back to old OS, for example, in my case i upgraded my
 system from 6.0.4 to Wheezy/SID now want to revert things back.

 If your repositories are explicit for stable, than there shouldn't
 happen an upgrade to testing or unstable.

 To restore your Debian stable in the future, IMO the easiest way is to
 do a backup before upgrading and to restore from such a backup if
 needed.

 You can backup any Linux from another Linux, e.g. from a live media, if

 you're root and run

 cd /path/to/debian_stable
 tar czf backup_name.tar.gz *

will clonezilla live CD work in this case? as i am using it very often
and  a bit useto with it.



 Globbing (here using *) and following links shouldn't be an issue for
 your setup. And IMO having several backups/snapshots is more safe than

now this snapshots point raising one more question in my mind.
did you means snapshots like XP and Other windows OS supports. for
example. i can make a snapshot before installing any service like
apache , samba or anything. and after installing , at the end i
realize that i messed up the whole box then i can revert my system
back to that particular snapshot and i will be at the old stage. can i
use snapshot in this context ( sorry for the newbie Questions but i am
confused with Microsoft and Linux as there are same services in both
OS and working entirely in different way)

 syncing backups. Btw. some dirs can be excluded, but IMO this makes a
 backup unneeded complicated.

 - Ralf





 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1337945545.2251.74.camel@precise



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMk8mzQ+5r=58e-L0TRfUA-M7DX4ojp5Ab=jz6f4ad8...@mail.gmail.com



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Muhammad Yousuf Khan
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Kumar Appaiah
a.ku...@alumni.iitm.ac.in wrote:
 On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 03:57:28PM +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
 in a testing environment I was trying to upgrade the security patches
 and I run the command
 apt-get upgrade.
 It ran fine, but at the end it upgraded my whole OS, first my test
 machine was showing Debian version 6.0.4 now after the upgrade it
 shifted to Wheezy/SID which I think is unstable.

 In Microsoft when we upgrade  the OS. it downloads only the security
 and OS patches.

 So the question are

 1. how to upgrade only the security patches?

 If security is your concern, you ought to be running stable as
 opposed to testing. If you run stable, then ensuring that
 security.debian.org is listed in the /etc/apt/sources.list will fetch
 security updates.
thanks for the response, but more i concern was a patch like fix
patches in Microsoft. i thought it would be working in same way :P as
i am already behind the firewall and actively monitoring things so
security from outside is not a concern for me. but securing the debian
box is also a target to achieve and security should not be neglected.
ill subscribe for the mailing list ASAP thanks for the advice.

 2. if the upgrade patch trigger any critical issue. Like any service
 like hosting, filesharing or squid got effected by the update, how
 come we know which patch cause this problem and how to remove that
 specific patch because in Microsoft I have seen that security patches
 and OS patches some time make problems when run along with ongoing
 services.

 I'd advise you to subscribe to the security mailing list of the
 projects which you run on your machine whose security issues you are
 concerned about.

 Read this for further details and ideas: http://www.debian.org/security/

 3. how to revert back to old OS, for example, in my case i upgraded my
 system from 6.0.4 to Wheezy/SID now want to revert things back.

 This is a little complicated and one could end up hosing one's
 system. I'd advise you to back up things and do a fresh install of
 squeeze.

 HTH.

 Kumar
 --
 We use Linux for all our mission-critical applications.  Having the source 
 code
 means that we are not held hostage by anyone's support department.
                -- Russell Nelson, President of Crynwr Software


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: 
 http://lists.debian.org/20120525114253.gb5...@bluemoon.alumni.iitm.ac.in



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmndqijonpyoejzjwx2x-s-ufrjqnzpry1raqzhaxtn...@mail.gmail.com



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 17:19 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
  cd /path/to/debian_stable
  tar czf backup_name.tar.gz *
 
 will clonezilla live CD work in this case? as i am using it very often
 and  a bit useto with it.

AFAIK yes, Clonezilla should be ok.

 now this snapshots point raising one more question in my mind.
 did you means snapshots like XP and Other windows OS supports. for
 example. i can make a snapshot before installing any service like
 apache , samba or anything. and after installing , at the end i
 realize that i messed up the whole box then i can revert my system
 back to that particular snapshot and i will be at the old stage. can i
 use snapshot in this context ( sorry for the newbie Questions but i am
 confused with Microsoft and Linux as there are same services in both
 OS and working entirely in different way)

If you don't sync, than yes, at least for Linux you'll restore exactly
what you had before, at a explicit date. I suspect XP does a kind of
sync and I suspect it will be possible for Linux too, but if you tar
your Debian or use Clonezilla to do a complete image, nothing could go
wrong.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1337948846.2251.94.camel@precise



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Muhammad Yousuf Khan
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 4:54 PM, rjc r...@linuxstuff.pl wrote:
 On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:57:28AM BST, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
 well, I have questions about upgrading Linux. since i have been using
 Microsoft for years the concept of upgrade I think is different from
 Linux upgrade.

 in a testing environment I was trying to upgrade the security patches
 and I run the command
 apt-get upgrade.
 It ran fine, but at the end it upgraded my whole OS, first my test
 machine was showing Debian version 6.0.4 now after the upgrade it
 shifted to Wheezy/SID which I think is unstable.

 Read below [0].

 In Microsoft when we upgrade  the OS. it downloads only the security
 and OS patches.

 So the question are

 1. how to upgrade only the security patches?

 aptitude update  aptitude safe-upgrade [1]

ok it will only update the security patches, no matter if what ever i
write in source.list?

one more question. for example. if i wanted to upgrade. but only to
stable version not to unstable or testing. then what could be done to
achieve this. if there is no stable version update then it shouldn’t
download anything from servers.

what i want is not just security patch but also OS to OS upgrade but
only stable releases
for, example. lenny to new lenny (but stable version)
for,example Lenny to Squeez (but stable squeez version)

how it is possible?



 2. if the upgrade patch trigger any critical issue. Like any service
 like hosting, filesharing or squid got effected by the update, how
 come we know which patch cause this problem and how to remove that
 specific patch because in Microsoft I have seen that security patches
 and OS patches some time make problems when run along with ongoing
 services.

 There are no patches like in Windows. Patches in free (open source)
 software are for source code [2].

 Upgrading a package you effectively installing a new version of the
 software.

 3. how to revert back to old OS, for example, in my case i upgraded my
 system from 6.0.4 to Wheezy/SID now want to revert things back.

 You can always install an older version of the package.

 [0] It seems like you had several entries in your sources.list file(s)
 - post the content of your file here.

deb http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main
deb http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports squeeze-backports main
deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sid main




 [1] safe-upgrade will only upgrade packages and won't remove any other
 ones

 [2] yes, I know, you can have binary patches as well

 Cheers,
 --
 rjc


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120525115409.ga13...@linuxstuff.pl



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMí2vyNrwYn+iq5gFem68PfOFj'cJbsCG1DvdeSF=w...@mail.gmail.com



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Brian
On Fri 25 May 2012 at 15:57:28 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:

 So the question are
 
 1. how to upgrade only the security patches?

Install stable and stick with it. Do not be tempted to alter sources.list
in /etc/apt/

 2. if the upgrade patch trigger any critical issue. Like any service
 like hosting, filesharing or squid got effected by the update, how
 come we know which patch cause this problem and how to remove that
 specific patch because in Microsoft I have seen that security patches
 and OS patches some time make problems when run along with ongoing
 services.

This is very, very unlikely to happen. If it did, someone would notice
and provide you with a fixed package.
 
 3. how to revert back to old OS, for example, in my case i upgraded my
 system from 6.0.4 to Wheezy/SID now want to revert things back.

Forget about it. Re-install stable.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120525124214.GD2847@desktop



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 17:37 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
 deb http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main
 deb-src http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main
 deb http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports squeeze-backports main
 deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sid main

You're issue is related to the sid repository. If you need something
from sid, then uncomment it and after that comment it. Don't feel secure
using pinning.

You can name the repositories stable instead of squeeze, so it will
use stable what ever Debian stable is named.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1337950166.2251.102.camel@precise



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Muhammad Yousuf Khan
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
 On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 17:37 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
 deb http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main
 deb-src http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main
 deb http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports squeeze-backports main
 deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sid main

 You're issue is related to the sid repository. If you need something
 from sid, then uncomment it and after that comment it. Don't feel secure
 using pinning.

 You can name the repositories stable instead of squeeze, so it will
 use stable what ever Debian stable is named.

ok ill comment the sid repo. but would you please give me a hint what
do you mean by naming squeeze to stable.

Thanks,



 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1337950166.2251.102.camel@precise



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMmCQz20uPBye6tLKU1=-NP97ATAU=tjalh_+wghuey...@mail.gmail.com



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread rjc
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 01:37:16PM BST, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
  1. how to upgrade only the security patches?
 
  aptitude update  aptitude safe-upgrade [1]
 
 ok it will only update the security patches, no matter if what ever i
 write in source.list?

No, this will upgrade any upgradeable packages - be it a security
update or not.

 one more question. for example. if i wanted to upgrade. but only to
 stable version not to unstable or testing. then what could be done to
 achieve this. if there is no stable version update then it shouldn’t
 download anything from servers.

You don't upgrade stable to stable, you upgrade certain packages
within the stable distribution - the above command will achieve just
that.

 what i want is not just security patch but also OS to OS upgrade but
 only stable releases
 for, example. lenny to new lenny (but stable version)

I don't quite get what you mean by Lenny to new Lenny?
Lenny is an unsupported old-stable release.

 for,example Lenny to Squeez (but stable squeez version)
 
 how it is possible?

Lenny to squeeze upgrade is somewhat different, you need to have
entries for both of these releases in you sources.list file(s).

aptitude update  aptitude full-upgrade

will do what you want here. Bear in mind that full-upgrade will remove
packages, i.e. the ones which are in conflict with the new ones.

  3. how to revert back to old OS, for example, in my case i upgraded my
  system from 6.0.4 to Wheezy/SID now want to revert things back.
 
  You can always install an older version of the package.
 
  [0] It seems like you had several entries in your sources.list file(s)
  - post the content of your file here.
 
 deb http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main
 deb-src http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main
 deb http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports squeeze-backports main
 deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sid main

This is the mistake you made, you've mixed both squeeze (stable) with
sid (unstable release) adding squeeze-backports on top of it.

I'd recommend reading about mixing of stable, testing unstable - stay
away from experimental ;^) - releases and what can you do with APT
pinning. Until then, stick with stable.

Cheers,
-- 
rjc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120525130609.ga15...@linuxstuff.pl



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread keith
On Fri, 25 May 2012 17:37:16 +0500
Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
 
  [0] It seems like you had several entries in your sources.list file(s)
  - post the content of your file here.
 
 deb http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main
 deb-src http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main
 deb http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports squeeze-backports main
 deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sid main
 

Delete the last line from your /etc/apt/sources.list

(# deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sid main)

And, I believe you can change 'squeeze' to 'stable',  remain updating the 
stable version, whatever the name.

Just as an aside; to make it easy on yourself, if you need to re-install again, 
make your partitioning scheme friendly.

i.e. One partition for swap, One partition for the / (system),  at least 
another for your /home (/or data);
then if you have to re-install, only overwrite your / partition. You should, of 
course, still have backups of your data as well.

-- 
keith km3...@gmail.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120525141048.181b7356179f064614743...@gmail.com



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Muhammad Yousuf Khan
ok found a website for which generates source.list

http://debgen.simplylinux.ch/

deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ squeeze-updates main contrib non-free
deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ squeeze-updates main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main contrib non-free
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main contrib non-free

please confirm if above repositories are good to go with,

In conclusion i found out that i should stick to stable and should not
play with the source list until unless it is necessary. even if i add
a repo then  i must comment it after installing the whatever package

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 6:10 PM, keith km3...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Fri, 25 May 2012 17:37:16 +0500
 Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote:
 [...]
 
  [0] It seems like you had several entries in your sources.list file(s)
  - post the content of your file here.

 deb http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main
 deb-src http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main
 deb http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports squeeze-backports main
 deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sid main


 Delete the last line from your /etc/apt/sources.list

 (# deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sid main)

 And, I believe you can change 'squeeze' to 'stable',  remain updating the 
 stable version, whatever the name.

 Just as an aside; to make it easy on yourself, if you need to re-install 
 again, make your partitioning scheme friendly.

 i.e. One partition for swap, One partition for the / (system),  at least 
 another for your /home (/or data);
 then if you have to re-install, only overwrite your / partition. You should, 
 of course, still have backups of your data as well.

 --
 keith km3...@gmail.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMmf36qZOXps0LuG1mxukC6kfJU4aszEN7TtsQ4=U=q...@mail.gmail.com



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 14:06 +0100, rjc wrote:
 Lenny to squeeze upgrade is somewhat different, you need to have
 entries for both of these releases in you sources.list file(s).

On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 17:58 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
 ok ill comment the sid repo. but would you please give me a hint what
 do you mean by naming squeeze to stable.

Comment out the backports too.

Instead of e.g.
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian squeeze main non-free contrib
use
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stable main non-free contrib

Than you'll get stable, what ever it's named.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1337951764.2251.110.camel@precise



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Muhammad Yousuf Khan
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
 PS:

 I like Synaptic, a GUI for the package management. It automatically set
 up an upgrade history. You manually can set up a history when using apt,
 however, Synaptic is very comfortable.

 A history provides information this way:
        package_name (1.11.4) to 1.12.0

do you know any CLI work in same way. i am not using GUI.


 Note, for the standard repository 1.11.4 is replaced by 1.12.0 too, so
 you can't simply downgrade using the same repository. You need another
 repository or to keep packages.


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1337946438.2251.82.camel@precise



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmntk9fntne7s8mvs4mthsxybhr+uysqmnicsov9r4m...@mail.gmail.com



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 18:28 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
 In conclusion i found out that i should stick to stable and should not
 play with the source list until unless it is necessary. even if i add
 a repo then  i must comment it after installing the whatever package

Yesno. I'll say yes, somebody else might recommend
http://jaqque.sbih.org/kplug/apt-pinning.html

Do you need src? Src repos provide source code only. You might need
headers to compile src codes from sourceforge etc., but seldom a Debian
src. Google if there is a stable stable-updates repository etc. too.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1337953000.2251.114.camel@precise



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Vi, 25 mai 12, 14:49:26, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
 On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 17:37 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
  deb http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main
  deb-src http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main
  deb http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports squeeze-backports main
  deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sid main
 
 You're issue is related to the sid repository. If you need something
 from sid, then uncomment it and after that comment it. Don't feel secure
 using pinning.

I don't agree. IMNSHO pinning (or simply setting Default-Release in 
apt.conf) is the correct way to use a mixed environment, because:

- installing even one package from the other repository can have 
  unwanted side effects without pinning. Use correct pinning and the 
  '-t' switch instead
- one will not be aware of any possibly security related updates[1]

[1] even unstable has some degree of security support, because the 
maintainer is usually aware of any stable security updates and will in 
most cases update the package in unstable too. Such packages are 
uploaded with 'urgency=high' and will also migrate faster to testing if 
possible.

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Tom H
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
 On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 17:37 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:

 deb http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main
 deb-src http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main
 deb http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports squeeze-backports main
 deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sid main

 You're issue is related to the sid repository. If you need something
 from sid, then uncomment it and after that comment it. Don't feel secure
 using pinning.

 You can name the repositories stable instead of squeeze, so it will
 use stable what ever Debian stable is named.

That means that the OP'll be upgraded automatically to wheezy when it
becomes stable! No one wants to do that. You want to choose when to
upgrade, if at all...


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=Sy6p0zjWA-9ePzfwpygAxnTFGPuBfOiCW4kG0=nzej...@mail.gmail.com



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 18:36 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
  A history provides information this way:
 package_name (1.11.4) to 1.12.0
 
 do you know any CLI work in same way. i am not using GUI.

A script using apt, aptitude or dpkg might be able to generate a history
too. I once used one of those commands to do this. Can't remember what
command I used. Man pages and --help should help. Writing shell scripts
in a naive way is easy to learn.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1337953530.2251.120.camel@precise



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Vi, 25 mai 12, 15:16:04, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
 
 Instead of e.g.
 deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian squeeze main non-free contrib
 use
 deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stable main non-free contrib
 
 Than you'll get stable, what ever it's named.

... but it might catch you unprepared if you don't follow release 
announcements.

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 16:50 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
 On Vi, 25 mai 12, 15:16:04, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
  
  Instead of e.g.
  deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian squeeze main non-free contrib
  use
  deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stable main non-free contrib
  
  Than you'll get stable, what ever it's named.
 
 ... but it might catch you unprepared if you don't follow release 
 announcements.

Again a good point and in this case I prefer using version names such as
squeeze too. I should have mentioned this too, instead of simply
answering the question, without further explanation.
Apologize to the OP.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1337954181.2251.125.camel@precise



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Vi, 25 mai 12, 15:45:30, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
 On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 18:36 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
   A history provides information this way:
  package_name (1.11.4) to 1.12.0
  
  do you know any CLI work in same way. i am not using GUI.
 
 A script using apt, aptitude or dpkg might be able to generate a history
 too. I once used one of those commands to do this. Can't remember what
 command I used. Man pages and --help should help. Writing shell scripts
 in a naive way is easy to learn.

dpkg, apt and aptitude have their own log files under /var/log/ (of 
course).

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


RE: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Bonno Bloksma
Hi,

 Instead of e.g.
 deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian squeeze main non-free contrib use 
 deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stable main non-free contrib
 
 Than you'll get stable, what ever it's named.

 ... but it might catch you unprepared if you don't follow release 
 announcements.

And just as with Microsoft upgrades it never realy quite workst just the way 
you thought it would work so Allways update the way described in the 
upgrade notes and that means one needs to have the release name like lenny, 
squeeze, etc. in the sources list and not stable so one can do a proper upgrade 
at the time of ones choosing.

Bonno Bloksma


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/89d1798a7351d040b4e74e0a043c69d70ac34...@hglexch-01.tio.nl



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread rjc
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 02:46:50PM BST, Tom H wrote:
 On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Ralf Mardorf
  You're issue is related to the sid repository. If you need something
  from sid, then uncomment it and after that comment it. Don't feel secure
  using pinning.
 
  You can name the repositories stable instead of squeeze, so it will
  use stable what ever Debian stable is named.
 
 That means that the OP'll be upgraded automatically to wheezy when it
 becomes stable! No one wants to do that. You want to choose when to
 upgrade, if at all...

I agree here, don't change squeeze to stable if you don't want to get
into trouble when wheezy comes out.

-- 
rjc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120525135946.ga18...@linuxstuff.pl



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 16:45 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
 - one will not be aware of any possibly security related updates

Good point


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1337953797.2251.121.camel@precise



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Camaleón
On Fri, 25 May 2012 15:57:28 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:

 well, I have questions about upgrading Linux. since i have been using
 Microsoft for years the concept of upgrade I think is different from
 Linux upgrade.
 
 in a testing environment I was trying to upgrade the security patches
 and I run the command
 apt-get upgrade.

Mmm, you should run first apt-get update to refresh the available 
packages.

 It ran fine, but at the end it upgraded my whole OS, first my test
 machine was showing Debian version 6.0.4 now after the upgrade it
 shifted to Wheezy/SID which I think is unstable.

The first thing you have to look at is the sources (/etc/apt/
sources.list). This is _the key_ for having a happy system :-)

The second thing is knowing what's what you want to get:

1/ Having a stable system
2/ Having a testing/sid system

For 1/ you have to point your sources to squeeze and add a security repo. 
That's all. 

For 2/ well, you have to point your sources to a testing or sid version 
and you have to update the whole system on a regular basis to avoid 
breaking things.

In my case, I only use apt-get update  apt-get dist-upgrade in both, 
stable and testing distributions: the sources will make the difference 
here.

 So the question are
 
 1. how to upgrade only the security patches? 

Stable versions only get security pathes (and a few of enhancements) so 
this is not a problem here. For testing/sid you have to update the whole 
system.

 2. if the upgrade patch trigger any critical issue. Like any service
 like hosting, filesharing or squid got effected by the update, how come
 we know which patch cause this problem and how to remove that specific
 patch because in Microsoft I have seen that security patches and OS
 patches some time make problems when run along with ongoing services.

You can remove/revert any package by reading the apt logs and using 
synaptic or aptitude to uninstall a specific package version and stick to 
the desired one.

 3. how to revert back to old OS, for example, in my case i upgraded my
 system from 6.0.4 to Wheezy/SID now want to revert things back.

I'm not sure if that will work, at least not flawlessly; you can fall 
into a dependency hell and lots of broken packages. Anyway, by the kind 
of questions you ask, I would suggest first a careful reading of the FAQ:

http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jpo450$4v3$6...@dough.gmane.org



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Indulekha
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 06:42:53AM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
 On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 03:57:28PM +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
  in a testing environment I was trying to upgrade the security patches
  and I run the command
  apt-get upgrade.
  It ran fine, but at the end it upgraded my whole OS, first my test
  machine was showing Debian version 6.0.4 now after the upgrade it
  shifted to Wheezy/SID which I think is unstable.
  
  In Microsoft when we upgrade  the OS. it downloads only the security
  and OS patches.
  
  So the question are
  
  1. how to upgrade only the security patches?
 
 If security is your concern, you ought to be running stable as
 opposed to testing. If you run stable, then ensuring that
 security.debian.org is listed in the /etc/apt/sources.list will fetch
 security updates.


Or, you could run testing and put in sources.list:
deb http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib non-free

Still, I do consider stable to be safer, and do stick with it...

-- 
❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤   
 Indulekha 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120525145453.GA13504@radhesyama



Re: Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Clive Standbridge
 deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
 deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
 deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ squeeze-updates main contrib non-free
 deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ squeeze-updates main contrib non-free
 deb http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main contrib non-free
 deb-src http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main contrib non-free
 
 please confirm if above repositories are good to go with,

There is a problem because you have mixed stable and squeeze. It
will work from now until wheezy is released, then your system will
partly upgrade itself to wheezy and something will likely break.

To fix that, use either stable or squeeze exclusively. I prefer to
use squeeze, as recommended by most of the people who have commented
here, so I can choose a convenient time to perform the upgrade to the
next release.

I hope this helps.

-- 
Cheers,
Clive


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120525150915.GA5209@lister.localdomain



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Mika Suomalainen
On 25.05.2012 15:49, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
 On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 17:37 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
 deb http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main
 deb-src http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main
 deb http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports squeeze-backports main
 deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sid main
 
 You're issue is related to the sid repository. If you need something
 from sid, then uncomment it and after that comment it. Don't feel secure
 using pinning.
 
 You can name the repositories stable instead of squeeze, so it will
 use stable what ever Debian stable is named.
 
 

Is it safe to use stable instead of squeeze? Are there usually any
conflicts or anything what would need full-upgrade whenever new
stable is named?

I am asking just for curiosity, I am Sid user.

-- 
[Mika Suomalainen](https://mkaysi.github.com/) ||
[gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys
4DB53CFE82A46728](http://mkaysi.github.com/PGP/key.txt) ||
[Why do I sign my
emails?](http://mkaysi.github.com/PGP/WhyDoISignEmails.html) ||
[Please don't send
HTML.](http://mkaysi.github.com/articles/complaining/HTML.html) ||
[Please don't
toppost](http://mkaysi.github.com/articles/complaining/topposting.html) ||
[This signature](https://gist.github.com/2643070) ||



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2012-05-25 17:53 +0200, Mika Suomalainen wrote:

 Is it safe to use stable instead of squeeze?

No, this is very much not recommended.

 Are there usually any conflicts or anything what would need
 full-upgrade whenever new stable is named?

Yes, about every two years when a new major Debian stable release is
made.  With stable in sources.list, you may find yourself upgrading to
the new release when you're not expecting it and are unprepared, similar
to the situation the OP has got himself into.

Using the codename avoids such surprises at the cost of having to alter
the sources.list file every two years (with a time window of one year
where more than one release is supported).

Cheers,
   Sven


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/871um8nrjd@turtle.gmx.de



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Tom H
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Mika Suomalainen
mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com wrote:
 On 25.05.2012 15:49, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
 On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 17:37 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:

 deb http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main
 deb-src http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main
 deb http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports squeeze-backports main
 deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sid main

 You're issue is related to the sid repository. If you need something
 from sid, then uncomment it and after that comment it. Don't feel secure
 using pinning.

 You can name the repositories stable instead of squeeze, so it will
 use stable what ever Debian stable is named.

 Is it safe to use stable instead of squeeze? Are there usually any
 conflicts or anything what would need full-upgrade whenever new
 stable is named?

No.

No need for aptitude full-upgrade, even apt-get upgrade/aptitude
safe-upgrade will pull in wheezy (partially) when it becomes
stable.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=sxbfo9v909tyot1g2o8zyvufo6fvz6bmd6zld2cgsg...@mail.gmail.com



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread keith
On Fri, 25 May 2012 18:28:29 +0500
Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote:

 ok found a website for which generates source.list
 
 http://debgen.simplylinux.ch/
 
 deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
 deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
 deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ squeeze-updates main contrib non-free
 deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ squeeze-updates main contrib non-free
 deb http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main contrib non-free
 deb-src http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main contrib non-free
 
 please confirm if above repositories are good to go with,
 
 In conclusion i found out that i should stick to stable and should not
 play with the source list until unless it is necessary. even if i add
 a repo then  i must comment it after installing the whatever package
 

I think that sources.list will work OK
(I believe it will prioritize the us sites if they come first)

With regard to using stable as a designation; I don't, I use Squeeze, but I 
thought I would just mention it.

-- 
keith km3...@gmail.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120525193831.31d79b1641243dd1030f5...@gmail.com



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread keith
On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:38:31 +0100
keith km3...@gmail.com wrote:

  deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
  deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free

My apologies, I somehow missed that, as someone else has pointed out. Use 
squeeze not stable.

(I know it's no excuse but I was distracted by someone whilst I was in the 
middle of replying, again sorry for missing that.)
-- 
keith keith...@yahoo.co.uk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/361072.18951...@smtp151.mail.ukl.yahoo.com



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Lisi
On Friday 25 May 2012 18:23:37 Tom H wrote:
 On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Mika Suomalainen

 mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com wrote:
  On 25.05.2012 15:49, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
  On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 17:37 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
  deb http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main
  deb-src http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main
  deb http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports squeeze-backports main
  deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sid main
 
  You're issue is related to the sid repository. If you need something
  from sid, then uncomment it and after that comment it. Don't feel secure
  using pinning.
 
  You can name the repositories stable instead of squeeze, so it will
  use stable what ever Debian stable is named.
 
  Is it safe to use stable instead of squeeze? Are there usually any
  conflicts or anything what would need full-upgrade whenever new
  stable is named?

 No.

 No need for aptitude full-upgrade, even apt-get upgrade/aptitude
 safe-upgrade will pull in wheezy (partially) when it becomes
 stable.

I prefer to use aptitude full-upgrade routinely - but I have the code name in 
my sources.list, not stable or testing.  I then change the code name when I 
want to get the more recent version.  So, Squeeze not stable, Muhammad.  you 
could get in quite a mess at the changeover point from Squeeze to Wheezy if 
you have stable in your sources.list, as several people have pointed out.

I can't comment on your Windows analogies as I don't use Windows.  I think 
that you need to expect that Linux will be different from whatever you used 
in Windows.  They are very different OSs.

FWIW, I do most of my admin from the CLI, including updating and upgrading.  
So yes, it can be done from the CLI.

Lisi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201205252130.54213.lisi.re...@gmail.com



Re: how to update Debian OS properly

2012-05-25 Thread Jon Dowland
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 02:17:35PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
 things for your current install might be /home only. Perhaps xorg.conf
 and some other files, using cp -pr while you're root. But in the future
 completely backup using e.g. tar. Note, if you sync, you anyway might
 lose data, since you might notice some issues after doing several
 backups and not already with the backup that did cause an issue.

Yes, sync is not backup (that is, an rsync by itself is not adequate coverage).
But neither is tar! A proper backup solution is something that covers the seven
points listed at http://www.taobackup.com/.  You can build a solution using
parts like tar, or rsync, or higher level tools like rdiff-backup, or bacula.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120525220506.GE31519@debian