Bug in der Installation des tetex-bin-Paketes?

2004-11-11 Thread Thomas Nunninger
Hi,

ich bin ein Debian-Newby. Habe gerade mit einer DVD vom Mai Sarge installiert 
(aber das sollte keine Sache sein, da mein Problem nach der Installation des 
Grundsystems beim späteren Einspielen weiterer Pakete per FTP aus dem Netz 
mit aptitude geschah). Ich habe im Modus expert24 installiert - falls das 
noch interessiert.

Es geht um das Paket tetex-bin. Nun wurde ich (im Debian-Configurations-Teil 
base-config?) gefragt, ob ich weitere Trenn-Muster laden wollte, was ich 
bejahte. Theoretisch denke ich, dass im darauf folgenden Dialog bei mir die 
beiden Punkte German mit alter respektive neuer Rechtschreibung markiert sein 
sollten (was auch eine Seite vorher so angekündigt wurde). Allerdings sind 
die Punkte

   french[=patois] und
   ngerman[austrian-neue_Rechtschreibung]

markiert. Da ich keine allzu positiven Erinnerungen an meine 
Französisch-Kenntnisse habe, wünschte ich mir, dass da sinnigerweise der 
Punkt

   german[=austrian-alte_Rechtschreibung]

der zwischen diesen beiden Auswahlpunkten zu finden ist, markiert wäre statt 
der französischen Pattern...

Kann mich jemand in der Vermutung bestätigen, dass dies vermutlich ein Fehler 
ist und dass der nicht in der älteren DVD begründet ist?

An wen müsste ich mich dann zwecks Bugreport wenden? Den Maintainer des 
tetex-Paketes, des Debian-Installers oder sonst wen? Oder schreibe ich das an 
eine spezielle Liste oder in die Bug-Datenbank?

Schönen Gruß und vielen Dank

Thomas



Re: Bug in der Installation des tetex-bin-Paketes?

2004-11-11 Thread Norbert Tretkowski
* Thomas Nunninger wrote:
 An wen müsste ich mich dann zwecks Bugreport wenden? Den Maintainer
 des tetex-Paketes, des Debian-Installers oder sonst wen? Oder
 schreibe ich das an eine spezielle Liste oder in die Bug-Datenbank?

http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting

Norbert


-- 
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): 
http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/

Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)



Re: installation of tetex

1997-02-28 Thread Christoph Martin

There is a serious problem/bug in dpkg that prevents the correct
removal of the old tex packages and then the installation of tetex.

dpkg can't handle multiple packages which are to be replaced.

So, do the following:

- Purge all the old tex packages which are replaced by tetex. (E.g. go
into dselect, select the tetex-packages, look which old tex packages
are marked to be removed, purge the packages.)

- Watch out that all config-files in /etc/texmf/ are removed, at
least texmf.cnf is incompatible. (dpkg --purge should do this for
you.)

- Install the tetex packages.

Don't install tetex over the old packages with --force**. You will get
an inconsitent system.

Douglas Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 
 I am trying to install the following tetex packages
1548580 Feb 24 09:04 tetex-base_0.4pl6-2.deb
1482224 Feb 24 09:06 tetex-bin_0.4pl6-4.deb
  50188 Feb 24 09:06 tetex-dev_0.4pl6-4.deb
4923348 Feb 24 09:07 tetex-doc_0.4pl6-1.deb
3161870 Feb 24 09:17 tetex-extra_0.4pl6-2.deb
 I began trying to do this within dselect.  Because of conflicts with
 the currently installed versions of TeX, I needed to mark several
 TeX-related packages for removal.  Installation of the tetex packages
 went ok then I removed the older tex-related packages that had been
 marked for removal.  I noticed that a couple of macro packages seemed
 to be missing.  According to dpkg -L they should have been installed
 by tetex-extra.
 
 I decided to remove all the tetex packages and re-install them.  My
 reasoning was that by installing tetex first then removing the older
 tex-related packages I may have inadvertently removed files that tetex
 packages installed.

This is correct. You also removed the config files of tetex which
leads you to the next problem:
 
 Removing the tetex packages and then trying to re-install fails in a
 couple of the postinst scripts.  These scripts try to execute
 /usr/bin/texconfig but it complains that the TEXMFCNF environment
 variable is not set.  I believe it may be intended to point at
 /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf.  That file is listed in the output of dpkg -L
 tetex-base but it does not appear to be installed by that package.
 
 Because /usr/bin/texconfig is based on a dialog library, the
 error messages fly off the screen before you can read them.
 
 Any suggestions will be appreciated.  It would help if you sent e-mail
 directly to me as well as to the list because I only receive the
 digests.
 
 -- 
 Douglas Bates[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Statistics Department608/262-2598
 University of Wisconsin - Madisonhttp://www.stat.wisc.edu/~bates/

-- 

Christoph Martin, Uni-Mainz, Germany
 Internet-Mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Help please: installation of TeTeX on a Debian machine.

1997-01-06 Thread Chow Chi-Ming
 Paul == Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Paul --cut-here---
Paul You just have to append the following lines to
Paul /var/lib/dpkg/status:

I thought the ``provides'' field should contain ONLY the ``agreed''
(discussed in debian-devel) virtual package names.  Does dpkg work if
the virtual package names are not official?

Paul Maybe somebody else has already developed a fine wrapper script
Paul for an installation of the teTeX binary distribution without
Paul dangerful messing around with system files?

I think unlike netscape, most of teTeX should be free and therefore
don't need a wrapper package a la netscape.

-- 
Billy C.-M. Chow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Department of Systems Engineering   
The Chinese University of Hong Kong


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Help please: installation of TeTeX on a Debian machine.

1997-01-06 Thread Paul Seelig
On Mon, 6 Jan 1997, Chow Chi-Ming wrote:

 I thought the ``provides'' field should contain ONLY the ``agreed''
 (discussed in debian-devel) virtual package names.  Does dpkg work if
 the virtual package names are not official?

Obviously it does here without problems. Sorry, i don't know of this
discussion. This debian-user list here is already too much to take for me 
for it's high traffic. ;-)
 
 Paul Maybe somebody else has already developed a fine wrapper script
 Paul for an installation of the teTeX binary distribution without
 Paul dangerful messing around with system files?
 
 I think unlike netscape, most of teTeX should be free and therefore
 don't need a wrapper package a la netscape.
 
No, a wrapper is just for installing a binary distribution of a program
not available in native Debian format. Binaries for teTeX could be
installed just like netscape's inside the Debian package management
scheme, that's all. Doesn't have anything to do with whether the program
is free or not. But for teTeX is valid that it is available in source and
that it is available under the GPL.
Someone else in this list already suggested to use the RedHat *.rpm of
teTeX for installation via the 'alien' command which should work as well.

If it wouldn't be too much to ask from a naive ethnologist like me i'd
really love to package teTeX as native Debian package and provide it for
the rest of the Debian user commnity. But that's probably too much strange
magic for my small brain... ;-) 
Regards, P. *8^)
-- 
   Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
   Johannes Gutenberg-University   -  Forum 6  -  55099 Mainz/Germany
   Our AMA Homepage  in  the WWW at  http://www.uni-mainz.de/~bender/


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Help please: installation of TeTeX on a Debian machine.

1997-01-06 Thread Paul Seelig
On 6 Jan 1997, James LewisMoss wrote:

 I'm not in any way involved with NTeX development, but I have installed
 it on SGIs, Ultrix, and DecUnix machines (as well as Linux) and while
 the earlier NTeX distribs were fairly difficult, the latest comes with
 precompiled binaries for many different platforms, and has a tcl/tk
 front end that is very easy to use.  So NTeX isn't too bad. :)  

I fear this discussion is becoming rather off-topic although this seems as
well to reflect that people are looking for alternatives to the LaTeX
system usually supplied with Debian...

The distinction has probably to be made in first place to the question if
NTeX is as uptodate and complete as teTeX and if it is too a consequent
implementation of the TDS (TeX Directory Structure) which has a similiar
approach as the Linux Filesystem Hierarchy Standard in regard of the
special TeX/LaTeX needs. 
   Regards, P.*8^)
--
   Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
   Johannes Gutenberg-University   -  Forum 6  -  55099 Mainz/Germany
   Our AMA Homepage  in  the WWW at  http://www.uni-mainz.de/~bender/


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Help please: installation of TeTeX on a Debian machine.

1997-01-05 Thread Paul Seelig
On Fri, 3 Jan 1997, Syrus Nemat-Nasser wrote:

 Given my current frustration in 
 dealing with the demands/complaints from the users regarding the TeX 
 stuff that is presently on this machine (standard Debian 1.2 packages),  
 I want to try out TeTeX.
 
Very good idea! The advantage of teTex is that it is complete with all
bells and whistles described in the LaTeX Book and the LaTeX Companion
and that it is an implementation which adheres to the TDS (TeX Directory 
Structure). I never regretted having installed it here at my system and
still don't understand why we have to reinvent the wheel for Debian. Well,
maybe it's more fun for the maintainer of the Debian TeX system to do it
all on his own... ;-)

 Can someone please give me the source from their dummy .deb package which 
 takes care of the TeX dependencies when using TeTeX?  Either that or a 
 simple list of the needed specs would be greatly appreciated.
 
From Markus Dickebohm [EMAIL PROTECTED] i have the following
specs to deal with:
--cut-here---
You just have to append the following lines to /var/lib/dpkg/status:


Package: equivs
Status: install ok installed
Priority: required
Section: misc
Installed-Size: 1
Maintainer: Markus Dickebohm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Version: 4.0-1
Provides: amslatex, amslatex, amsfonts, amstex, auctex, babel, bibindex,
bibtex, bibtool, dvi2tty, kpathsea, latex, latex2e-doc, ltxmisc, ltxtool,
mfbasfnt, mfbin, mflib, mfnfss, oldgerman, pandora, ps2pk, psnfss, xypic,
texbin, texidoc, texinfo, texlib, texpsfnt, textfm, xdvi

Depends:
Description: This is a dummy package that tells debians package-management
 about software on the system equivalent to debian-packages.
 .
 Just name every package that is provided by your own activities in the
 line Provides:  in the file /var/lib/dpkg/status.


Then you do the following:

 touch /var/lib/dpkg/info/equivs.list
 echo exit 1  /var/lib/dpkg/info/equivs.postrm

Of course, you can supply your own adress in the Maintainer-field.
--cut-here---
Have in mind that i had to break the lines here in this email! The
Provides: field is actually one ininterrupted line. If not, dselect/dpkg
will complain.

Maybe somebody else has already developed a fine wrapper script for an
installation of the teTeX binary distribution without dangerful messing
around with system files? 

I have installed teTeX-0.4 in /usr/local/lib/teTeX/ with symlinks
pointing to the binaries of /usr/local/lib/teTeX/bin/ in the regular 
/usr/local/bin. This teTeX really is selfcontained and is very easy to
setup and maintain if you closely follow the provided READMEs! Dropping
in new packages (i added TIPA and MusixTeX) is very well manageable
because of the TDS layout.
 Happy LaTeXin', P. *8^)
-- 
   Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
   Johannes Gutenberg-University   -  Forum 6  -  55099 Mainz/Germany
   Our AMA Homepage  in  the WWW at  http://www.uni-mainz.de/~bender/


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Help please: installation of TeTeX on a Debian machine.

1997-01-05 Thread Paul Seelig
On Sun, 5 Jan 1997, Jonas Bofjall wrote:

 I tried searching around for teTeX whis morning, and I found a lot of
 FTP-sites carrying the files, I also found the maintainer's address and
 the mailing-list. BUT do you know if there is a teTeX web-page somewhere,
 where some general information, maybe some installation help and useful
 links exists? Anyone?
 
AFAIK there is still no proper web site for teTeX but you may get some
reading either at http://www.informatik.uni-hannover.de/docs/teTeX/; or
by downloading the README, INSTALL, etc files at any CTAN FTP site. 
As you are in Sweden you might as well check out the german CTAN at the
URL ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX/;. Look around
there and download the documentation. It contains virtually everything you
may want to know about teTeX for a successful installation as long as you
are able to follow instructions in written form. ;-) 

   Regards, P. *8^)
-- 
   Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
   Johannes Gutenberg-University   -  Forum 6  -  55099 Mainz/Germany
   Our AMA Homepage  in  the WWW at  http://www.uni-mainz.de/~bender/



--
This message was delayed because the list mail delivery agent was down.


Re: Help please: installation of TeTeX on a Debian machine.

1997-01-05 Thread Jonas Bofjall
On Sun, 5 Jan 1997, Paul Seelig wrote:

 Very good idea! The advantage of teTex is that it is complete with all
 bells and whistles described in the LaTeX Book and the LaTeX Companion
 and that it is an implementation which adheres to the TDS (TeX Directory 

Then I guess I should be installing teTeX as well. I need to do some
TeX'ing but the standard Debian TeX package always seems to come up with a
new problem once I fixed one. The standard TeX package in Debian, is it
a completely new TeX distribution or is it based on some other?
Do you know what NTeX is? I was told it was a good TeX distribution, but
maybe I should try teTeX instead.

  // Jonas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2:201/262.37]


--
This message was delayed because the list mail delivery agent was down.


Re: Help please: installation of TeTeX on a Debian machine.

1997-01-05 Thread Paul Seelig
On Sun, 5 Jan 1997, Jonas Bofjall wrote:

 Then I guess I should be installing teTeX as well. I need to do some
 TeX'ing but the standard Debian TeX package always seems to come up with
 a new problem once I fixed one.  

Then you'll be really happy with teTeX! Today i had a notice by Thomas
Esser from the teTeX mailing list in my email where he wrote that he was
about to release the next teTeX update really soon. He wrote sunday or
monday but i'm not sure if he meant this weekend or the next. Anyway he
promised that this release will be a 100% uptodate as well. :-) Maybe you
should really wait for the brandnew teTeX before you bother about
downloading and installation, although upgrading is very well solutioned
too. You can find out the nearest CTAN with finger [EMAIL PROTECTED].

 The standard TeX package in Debian, is it a completely new TeX
 distribution or is it based on some other? 

Looks rather like a basic LaTeX/TeX system tailored especially for Debian
than a distribution of some sort. But OTOH i never tried it out giving it
not even a chance to supply it's services on my machine so i can't really 
judge about it's quality.

I installed teTeX once on a HP-UX machine at work and was surprised how
easy and straightforward it went and how complete the provided TeX system
actually is. I immediately fell in love with it! ;-) It comes along with
very well and extensive documentation.  The great thing to my mind is that
i never needed to install anything to get a variety of LaTeX files TeXed
apart from more obscure stuff like MusiXTeX, the TIPA phonetic fonts and
Jorg Knappens fcfonts (african fonts). It is a stated goal of Thomas
Esser to provide everything described in the LaTeX Book and the LaTeX
Companion. 

Our university here in Mainz has BTW adopted teTeX as the regular LaTeX
installation on the campus' Unix cluster and i consider it wonderful to
have the same working environment anywhere, be it at home, at work or at
the university. :-)

 Do you know what NTeX is? I was told it was a good TeX distribution, but
 maybe I should try teTeX instead.
 
NTeX is a very large TeX distribution which was usually provided with
Slackware and which is not as well designed and maintained as teTeX. If i
were you i wouldn't bother with NTeX especially since it has earned itself
the fame of being hard to administrate, a thing teTeX definitely has eased
up a lot. 
Regards, P. *8^)
-- 
   Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
   Johannes Gutenberg-University   -  Forum 6  -  55099 Mainz/Germany
   Our AMA Homepage  in  the WWW at  http://www.uni-mainz.de/~bender/


--
This message was delayed because the list mail delivery agent was down.


Re: Help please: installation of TeTeX on a Debian machine.

1997-01-05 Thread Jonas Bofjall
On Sun, 5 Jan 1997, Paul Seelig wrote:

 promised that this release will be a 100% uptodate as well. :-) Maybe you
 should really wait for the brandnew teTeX before you bother about

If it is just a week or two I'll rather wait. I like what I hear :)
Someone actually told me that I should install teTeX maybe a month ago
when I was running 0.93R6 but then 1.2 came and I tried its TeX instead.
It is better, but not good.

 Looks rather like a basic LaTeX/TeX system tailored especially for Debian
 than a distribution of some sort. But OTOH i never tried it out giving it

Well... Maybe there should be put together a Debian teTeX package.
The maintainer of the current Debian TeX package maybe should spend his
time helping teTeX instead of his own stuff. But I suppose he's got a
reason not to do so... What is better about Debian TeX, anyone?

 NTeX is a very large TeX distribution which was usually provided with
 Slackware and which is not as well designed and maintained as teTeX. If i

Then I will go for teTeX instead.

I tried searching around for teTeX whis morning, and I found a lot of
FTP-sites carrying the files, I also found the maintainer's address and
the mailing-list. BUT do you know if there is a teTeX web-page somewhere,
where some general information, maybe some installation help and useful
links exists? Anyone?

thanks...

  // Jonas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2:201/262.37]


--
This message was delayed because the list mail delivery agent was down.


Help please: installation of TeTeX on a Debian machine.

1997-01-04 Thread Syrus Nemat-Nasser
Hello Debianites.

I've seen discussions regarding this issue before.  I have a Debian 
machine at work which needs to be a reliable platform for Scientific 
documment processing in TeX/LaTeX.  Given my current frustration in 
dealing with the demands/complaints from the users regarding the TeX 
stuff that is presently on this machine (standard Debian 1.2 packages),  
I want to try out TeTeX.

Can someone please give me the source from their dummy .deb package which 
takes care of the TeX dependencies when using TeTeX?  Either that or a 
simple list of the needed specs would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks.  Syrus.

--
Syrus Nemat-Nasser [EMAIL PROTECTED]UCSD Physics Dept.



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]