Re: light spreadsheet for stable?

1999-09-02 Thread Tadeusz Bak


On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Richard E. Hawkins wrote:

 
 I need to find as light as possible a spreadsheet that still works 
 reasonably will for stable.  I'll recall Thumper's daddy's advice, and 


You can try XessLite (http://www.ais.com). Works very well under slink.
But it's shareware, not free!

-- 
 Tad


Re: light spreadsheet for stable?

1999-09-02 Thread Pann McCuaig
On Wed, Sep 01, 1999 at 01:18:41PM -0500, Richard E. Hawkins wrote:

 I need to find as light as possible a spreadsheet that still works 
 reasonably will for stable.  I'll recall Thumper's daddy's advice, and 
 not say anything at all about oleo and siag.  Staroffice 5 in 16mb is 
 out of the question, an gnumeric seems to want gnome, which suggest 
 that it too will suck resources.
 
 I really only need this for grades (so I need the elementary lookup 
 functions), and to hold/sort data to dump for mail-merge.  But it needs 
 to play nicely with other applications on a 16mb system (And I'll leave 
 aside the issue of issuing faculty 16mb P120's . . . :)

Package: sc
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: math
Installed-Size: 196
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Version: 6.21-8
Depends: libc6 (= 2.0.7u), libncurses4
Description: Spreadsheet Calculator
 This is a much modified version of the public domain spread sheet sc,
 which was posted to Usenet several years ago by Mark Weiser as vc,
 originally by James Gosling. It is based on rectangular table much
 like a financial spreadsheet.

And if you're a vi user, you'll love the keystroke navigation.  ;-
-- 
What's All the Buzz About Linux?L I N U X   .~.
The Choice  /V\
http://www.ourmanpann.com/linux/ of a GNU  /( )\
Generation ^^-^^


light spreadsheet for stable?

1999-09-01 Thread Richard E. Hawkins

I need to find as light as possible a spreadsheet that still works 
reasonably will for stable.  I'll recall Thumper's daddy's advice, and 
not say anything at all about oleo and siag.  Staroffice 5 in 16mb is 
out of the question, an gnumeric seems to want gnome, which suggest 
that it too will suck resources.

I really only need this for grades (so I need the elementary lookup 
functions), and to hold/sort data to dump for mail-merge.  But it needs 
to play nicely with other applications on a 16mb system (And I'll leave 
aside the issue of issuing faculty 16mb P120's . . . :)

-- 
These opinions will not be those of UNI until it pays my retainer.



Re: light spreadsheet for stable?

1999-09-01 Thread Sean
You might want to look at either Abs or Abacus .

Abacus has a deb package (meaning you can install it by typing apt-get install
abacus), and is only around 400k large after installation.

Abs hasn't been debianized AFAIK, and can be found here:
http://www.ping.be/bertin/abs.shtml .. it weighs in after compilation at around 
700k,
although if you stripped the binary this would probably be a good deal smaller.

I haven't really messed with either one enough to be able to say which is 
better, but
from what you describe, one or the other might fit the bill for you.  Good luck.

Sean


Richard E. Hawkins wrote:

 I need to find as light as possible a spreadsheet that still works
 reasonably will for stable.  I'll recall Thumper's daddy's advice, and
 not say anything at all about oleo and siag.  Staroffice 5 in 16mb is
 out of the question, an gnumeric seems to want gnome, which suggest
 that it too will suck resources.

 I really only need this for grades (so I need the elementary lookup
 functions), and to hold/sort data to dump for mail-merge.  But it needs
 to play nicely with other applications on a 16mb system (And I'll leave
 aside the issue of issuing faculty 16mb P120's . . . :)

 --
 These opinions will not be those of UNI until it pays my retainer.

 --
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null


Re: light spreadsheet for stable?

1999-09-01 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Sep 01, 1999 at 01:18:41PM -0500, Richard E. Hawkins wrote:

 out of the question, an gnumeric seems to want gnome, which suggest 
 that it too will suck resources.

Give it a go - I've used it on a 16MB system before, and the resource
usage isn't unreasonable.   It depends on what you consider excessive,
though.

-- 
Mark Brown  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   (Trying to avoid grumpiness)
http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~broonie/
EUFShttp://www.eusa.ed.ac.uk/societies/filmsoc/


pgpCOp6rpW4Wt.pgp
Description: PGP signature