Re: linux-source-3.2.0-rc7
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 01:32:32 -0500 (EST), lina wrote: On Friday 06,January,2012 10:42 AM, Stephen Powell wrote: I'm also curious as to why you need, or think you need, to build a custom kernel in the first place. The wireless is not supported, bcm4331. so ... If the issue is that your current stock kernel does not support your wireless chips, but a 3.2.0 kernel does, you can obtain binary stock kernel images from experimental that may meet your needs without having to build a custom kernel from source. For example, linux-image-3.2.0-rc7-686-pae or linux-image-3.2.0-rc7-amd64 depending on whether you want a 32-bit or 64-bit kernel. You shouldn't need a headers package unless you need to install an out-of-kernel-source-tree kernel module image from source with module-assistant or dkms. If you do need a headers package, the corresponding headers packages to the above two kernels are linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-686-pae or linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-all-amd64 respectively. -- .''`. Stephen Powell : :' : `. `'` `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/114245798.325351.1325957044676.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com
Re: linux-source-3.2.0-rc7
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 02:16:12 +0800, lina wrote: On 6 Jan, 2012, at 1:51, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: But you listed many different packages... which one did you finally install? I didn't choose any of them. (Ha... So many choices was equal no choice) That's why I was looking for the .deb already built in repository. Mmm, okay. So you decided to manually get the package from another place. I used to install the linux-header-version and linux-images-version, wrong? Nothing wrong, but those packages (headers) are not needed unless you specifically require them (for compiling things), so what was your goal or just installing for the sake of installing? :-) Yes. Haha. I noticed after make-kpkg it generated the linux headers and images. (might due to I used some flags). So I thought both are needed. So next time i will only install the headers? I can't say... I also have a self-compiled kernel (like you) but at least until now I have not needed the headers files for nothing :-) But again, kernel headers files have to match your exact kernel version (the kernel version for you want to have the headers, of course), otherwise it won't work. I can't tell what to look because I don't know at what stage you received the kernel panic (while booting, maybe?). Unless you provide more data, I can only make wild guesses. Yes. After booting. Choose the newly built kernel. It's just stopped. I forget the detailed information and forget to take a photo. Okay, so you were not able to boot with that kernel. And what's your current situation? What packages have you installed? Can you boot your system normally? I have old kernel 3.1. Things are back to fine if I don't make some new trouble. Tomorrow I guess I want to try to rebuild. Mmm, good, I think. May I ask you something? Of course. Are there some intelligent package, something like read the lspci and other hardware information. And according the info to vim the .config I don't have much hardware knowledge either, so can't build a specific and light kernel. Last one I build the /lib/module so heavy. This has been commented some times here, in this mailing list. I opened a thread asking for the same. You can read the full thread to find out more tips but here are the conclusions: http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2011/09/msg01903.html The key was in using localmodconfig which allows to make what I call express (compilego) kernels very fast which can be useful to try a new driver or make some tests. Stephen Powell has a very good and detailed doc about compiling kernels in Debian, it's worth reading: http://users.wowway.com/~zlinuxman/Kernel.htm Give detailed steps on what you are doing right now, what's the current kernel you are running and what's wrong with it. You are admirable SERIOUS. Which is something I miss in my life. Haha... Inspiring. Well, problems are just a bucnh of variables that need to be clearly identified and defined. I say this because most of the time (90%) we - users- think we have a problem when what we really got is a bit of mess in our head :-) Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2012.01.06.12.35...@gmail.com
Re: linux-source-3.2.0-rc7
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 14:38:23 +0800, lina wrote: a quick question, Which header I should choose? linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-all_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb This is a metapackage which includes all (for all of the available architectures) of the headers packages. linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-all-amd64_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb This is a metapackage which includes all (for all of the available architectures of amd64) of the headers packages. linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-amd64_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb Individual package headers for amd64 arch. linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-common_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb Commom files for headers (amd64 arch.) linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-rt-amd64_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb Individual package headers for amd64 arch and RT kernel. what does the last one mean, rt? It should be for a _R_eal _T_ime kernel. Hum... wait. There is/was no real time kernels compiled for Debian unless this has changed recently :-? and what's the difference among those, The difference is the type of kernel you are currently using and what kind of package do you need. Thanks, $ uname -a Linux debian 3.2.0-rc6-3.2-mj-lina #1 SMP Sat Dec 17 13:14:26 SGT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux the one I built from kernel.org a bit heavy, took so much space. I am not sure if I built from debian repository whether it will be light, Mmmm... those kernel headers (compiled for 3.2.0-rc7) won't match your current and self-compiled kernel (3.2.0-rc6). Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2012.01.05.15.25...@gmail.com
Re: linux-source-3.2.0-rc7
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 12:38 AM, lina lina.lastn...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, a quick question, Which header I should choose? $ uname -a Linux debian 3.2.0-rc6-3.2-mj-lina #1 SMP Sat Dec 17 13:14:26 SGT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux the one I built from kernel.org a bit heavy, took so much space. I am not sure if I built from debian repository whether it will be light, While this command won't work for your self-compiled kernel, the route I use for ensuring I get the correct headers is: # apt-get install linux-headers-$(uname -r) This lets uname figure out which one you need so you don't have to worry about it! -- Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caoevnyvb8kofwu9kkrqu_+fvthioft20fmh7ynu_bztqlo6...@mail.gmail.com
Re: linux-source-3.2.0-rc7
On Thursday 05,January,2012 11:25 PM, Camaleón wrote: On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 14:38:23 +0800, lina wrote: a quick question, Which header I should choose? linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-all_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb This is a metapackage which includes all (for all of the available architectures) of the headers packages. linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-all-amd64_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb This is a metapackage which includes all (for all of the available architectures of amd64) of the headers packages. linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-amd64_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb Individual package headers for amd64 arch. linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-common_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb Commom files for headers (amd64 arch.) linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-rt-amd64_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb Individual package headers for amd64 arch and RT kernel. what does the last one mean, rt? It should be for a _R_eal _T_ime kernel. Hum... wait. There is/was no real time kernels compiled for Debian unless this has changed recently :-? and what's the difference among those, The difference is the type of kernel you are currently using and what kind of package do you need. Thanks, $ uname -a Linux debian 3.2.0-rc6-3.2-mj-lina #1 SMP Sat Dec 17 13:14:26 SGT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux the one I built from kernel.org a bit heavy, took so much space. I am not sure if I built from debian repository whether it will be light, Mmmm... those kernel headers (compiled for 3.2.0-rc7) won't match your current and self-compiled kernel (3.2.0-rc6). Greetings, I installed one, after reboot, it got kernel panic, even can't mount / and others. so I just back to old old kernel and removed present one. now I decided to download from kernel.org and do a try. the kernel panic was caused due to my .config file or ? I am also stuck in Warning messages as following: even for opening emails. another thing is bad, my $ date Mon Jan 1 08:26:27 SGT 2001 It's getting 11 years younger (not me). bad ... bad ... bad .. to the past. This Connection is Untrusted You have asked Iceweasel to connect securely to mail.google.com, but we can't confirm that your connection is secure. Normally, when you try to connect securely, sites will present trusted identification to prove that you are going to the right place. However, this site's identity can't be verified. What Should I Do? If you usually connect to this site without problems, this error could mean that someone is trying to impersonate the site, and you shouldn't continue. Technical Details I Understand the Risks If you understand what's going on, you can tell Iceweasel to start trusting this site's identification. Even if you trust the site, this error could mean that someone is tampering with your connection. Don't add an exception unless you know there's a good reason why this site doesn't use trusted identification. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/3a4fcfc5.5010...@gmail.com
Re: linux-source-3.2.0-rc7
On Mon, 01 Jan 2001 08:31:01 +0800, lina wrote: On Thursday 05,January,2012 11:25 PM, Camaleón wrote: (...) $ uname -a Linux debian 3.2.0-rc6-3.2-mj-lina #1 SMP Sat Dec 17 13:14:26 SGT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux the one I built from kernel.org a bit heavy, took so much space. I am not sure if I built from debian repository whether it will be light, Mmmm... those kernel headers (compiled for 3.2.0-rc7) won't match your current and self-compiled kernel (3.2.0-rc6). I installed one, Which one? after reboot, it got kernel panic, even can't mount / and others. so I just back to old old kernel and removed present one. Kernel headers version have to match your current kernel version. now I decided to download from kernel.org and do a try. Can you tell us why are you trying to install the kernel headers? the kernel panic was caused due to my .config file or ? Who knows, maybe if you say what's the error you got (kernel panic)... but again, kernel headers are version-aware. I am also stuck in Warning messages as following: even for opening emails. (...) Lina, to avoid mixing up things, better solve your kernel headers problematic and then open separate threads for the rest of the issues should they still apply. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2012.01.05.17.08...@gmail.com
Re: linux-source-3.2.0-rc7
On Friday 06,January,2012 01:08 AM, Camaleón wrote: On Mon, 01 Jan 2001 08:31:01 +0800, lina wrote: On Thursday 05,January,2012 11:25 PM, Camaleón wrote: (...) $ uname -a Linux debian 3.2.0-rc6-3.2-mj-lina #1 SMP Sat Dec 17 13:14:26 SGT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux the one I built from kernel.org a bit heavy, took so much space. I am not sure if I built from debian repository whether it will be light, Mmmm... those kernel headers (compiled for 3.2.0-rc7) won't match your current and self-compiled kernel (3.2.0-rc6). I installed one, Which one? You know, this thread I posted hours ago. later I downloaded directly from the http://packages.debian.org/experimental/linux-source-3.2 the bottom, there is Architecture Package Size Installed Size Files all http://packages.debian.org/experimental/all/linux-source-3.2/download 73,700.3 kB73,744.0 kB [list of files http://packages.debian.org/experimental/all/linux-source-3.2/filelist] not build from the left side of .dsc and else as before. after reboot, it got kernel panic, even can't mount / and others. so I just back to old old kernel and removed present one. Kernel headers version have to match your current kernel version. now I decided to download from kernel.org and do a try. Can you tell us why are you trying to install the kernel headers? I used to install the linux-header-version and linux-images-version, wrong? the kernel panic was caused due to my .config file or ? Who knows, maybe if you say what's the error you got (kernel panic)... but again, kernel headers are version-aware. I don't know from where I can check the log information, I tried to grep panic from /var/log, but there is none. I am also stuck in Warning messages as following: even for opening emails. (...) Lina, to avoid mixing up things, better solve your kernel headers I am here. problematic and then open separate threads for the rest of the issues should they still apply. I really realize that one saying, trouble never never comes alone. the date issue is so bad, I can't open webpage without warning, even can't open my email box, neither mention send emails and build package. but now I feel it's really funny. I mean, things are really time sensitive. Now I can't connect to kernel.org. Greetings, Thanks,
Re: linux-source-3.2.0-rc7
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 01:18:51 +0800, lina wrote: (careful with that html... :-) ) On Friday 06,January,2012 01:08 AM, Camaleón wrote: I installed one, Which one? You know, this thread I posted hours ago. But you listed many different packages... which one did you finally install? later I downloaded directly from the http://packages.debian.org/experimental/linux-source-3.2 the bottom, there is Architecture Package Size Installed Size Files all http://packages.debian.org/experimental/all/linux-source-3.2/download 73,700.3 kB73,744.0 kB [list of files http://packages.debian.org/experimental/all/linux-source-3.2/filelist] not build from the left side of .dsc and else as before. Ah, okay, linux-source-3.2_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_all.deb. The mother of the headers packages. after reboot, it got kernel panic, even can't mount / and others. so I just back to old old kernel and removed present one. Kernel headers version have to match your current kernel version. now I decided to download from kernel.org and do a try. Can you tell us why are you trying to install the kernel headers? I used to install the linux-header-version and linux-images-version, wrong? Nothing wrong, but those packages (headers) are not needed unless you specifically require them (for compiling things), so what was your goal or just installing for the sake of installing? :-) the kernel panic was caused due to my .config file or ? Who knows, maybe if you say what's the error you got (kernel panic)... but again, kernel headers are version-aware. I don't know from where I can check the log information, I tried to grep panic from /var/log, but there is none. I can't tell what to look because I don't know at what stage you received the kernel panic (while booting, maybe?). Unless you provide more data, I can only make wild guesses. I am also stuck in Warning messages as following: even for opening emails. (...) Lina, to avoid mixing up things, better solve your kernel headers I am here. And what's your current situation? What packages have you installed? Can you boot your system normally? problematic and then open separate threads for the rest of the issues should they still apply. I really realize that one saying, trouble never never comes alone. the date issue is so bad, I can't open webpage without warning, even can't open my email box, neither mention send emails and build package. but now I feel it's really funny. I mean, things are really time sensitive. Now I can't connect to kernel.org. Give detailed steps on what you are doing right now, what's the current kernel you are running and what's wrong with it. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2012.01.05.17.51...@gmail.com
Re: linux-source-3.2.0-rc7
On 6 Jan, 2012, at 1:51, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 01:18:51 +0800, lina wrote: (careful with that html... :-) ) Thanks. On Friday 06,January,2012 01:08 AM, Camaleón wrote: I installed one, Which one? You know, this thread I posted hours ago. But you listed many different packages... which one did you finally install? I didn't choose any of them. (Ha... So many choices was equal no choice) That's why I was looking for the .deb already built in repository. later I downloaded directly from the http://packages.debian.org/experimental/linux-source-3.2 the bottom, there is Architecture Package Size Installed Size Files all http://packages.debian.org/experimental/all/linux-source-3.2/download 73,700.3 kB73,744.0 kB [list of files http://packages.debian.org/experimental/all/linux-source-3.2/filelist] not build from the left side of .dsc and else as before. Ah, okay, linux-source-3.2_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_all.deb. The mother of the headers packages. after reboot, it got kernel panic, even can't mount / and others. so I just back to old old kernel and removed present one. Kernel headers version have to match your current kernel version. now I decided to download from kernel.org and do a try. Can you tell us why are you trying to install the kernel headers? I used to install the linux-header-version and linux-images-version, wrong? Nothing wrong, but those packages (headers) are not needed unless you specifically require them (for compiling things), so what was your goal or just installing for the sake of installing? :-) Yes. Haha. I noticed after make-kpkg it generated the linux headers and images. (might due to I used some flags). So I thought both are needed. So next time i will only install the headers? the kernel panic was caused due to my .config file or ? Who knows, maybe if you say what's the error you got (kernel panic)... but again, kernel headers are version-aware. I don't know from where I can check the log information, I tried to grep panic from /var/log, but there is none. I can't tell what to look because I don't know at what stage you received the kernel panic (while booting, maybe?). Unless you provide more data, I can only make wild guesses. Yes. After booting. Choose the newly built kernel. It's just stopped. I forget the detailed information and forget to take a photo. I am also stuck in Warning messages as following: even for opening emails. (...) Lina, to avoid mixing up things, better solve your kernel headers I am here. And what's your current situation? What packages have you installed? Can you boot your system normally? I have old kernel 3.1. Things are back to fine if I don't make some new trouble. Tomorrow I guess I want to try to rebuild. May I ask you something? Are there some intelligent package, something like read the lspci and other hardware information. And according the info to vim the .config I don't have much hardware knowledge either, so can't build a specific and light kernel. Last one I build the /lib/module so heavy. problematic and then open separate threads for the rest of the issues should they still apply. I really realize that one saying, trouble never never comes alone. the date issue is so bad, I can't open webpage without warning, even can't open my email box, neither mention send emails and build package. but now I feel it's really funny. I mean, things are really time sensitive. Now I can't connect to kernel.org. Give detailed steps on what you are doing right now, what's the current kernel you are running and what's wrong with it. You are admirable SERIOUS. Which is something I miss in my life. Haha... Inspiring. Greetings, Best wishes, P.S. back 10 hours later. -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2012.01.05.17.51...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/a8a14fd6-1b07-4fed-b3e2-51d6161dd...@gmail.com
Re: linux-source-3.2.0-rc7
On 06/01/12 05:16, lina wrote: snipped Are there some intelligent package, something like read the lspci and other hardware information. And according the info to vim the .config NAFAIK (yet...) though I keep looking and I've started on something similar a few times based on Knoppix and using kudzu. It's on that long list of things to do if I live that long ;-) Your best bet is probably to set up a stock system that supports all your hardware and also your networking needs. Choose the light, targeted (rather than generic), initrd. Decide whether you intend to build kernel that uses initrd or not (load all modules or have them built in) - then examine loaded modules to see what you need, and remove unneeded built-in kernels. Pretty much the technique used for building kernels for embedded systems. The automated part you're looking for - there are a couple of scripts around that attempt to do this for you, here's one[*1]:- http://andreas.goelzer.de/kernel-config-based-on-lsmod-output I don't have much hardware knowledge either, so can't build a specific and light kernel. Last one I build the /lib/module so heavy. You don't really need the hardware knowledge - just to know what you have that you want supported. snipped Cheers -- Iceweasel/Firefox extensions for finding answers to Debian questions:- https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/collections/Scott_Ferguson/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f0650fb.6090...@gmail.com
Re: linux-source-3.2.0-rc7
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 01:38:23 -0500 (EST), lina wrote: Hi, a quick question, Which header I should choose? linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-all_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-all-amd64_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-amd64_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-common_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-rt-amd64_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb what does the last one mean, rt? and what's the difference among those, Thanks, $ uname -a Linux debian 3.2.0-rc6-3.2-mj-lina #1 SMP Sat Dec 17 13:14:26 SGT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux the one I built from kernel.org a bit heavy, took so much space. I am not sure if I built from debian repository whether it will be light, It appears that you are running a custom kernel, based on the output of uname -a. In that case, none of the above headers will match your kernel. I suggest that you read http://users.wowway.com/~zlinuxman/Kernel.htm Among other things, it will tell you how to build a headers package that goes with the custom kernel. But, depending on why you need, or think you need, a headers package, you may or may not actually need the headers package. For example, if the only reason that you need a headers package is to install the Nvidia proprietary drivers, and you are using the Debian kernel module source packages for the proprietary drivers, and you use kernel-package to produce the custom kernel, then, assuming that you do things properly, you won't need a headers package in the first place. See the above web page for details. It is not short and sweet, but it is thorough and comprehensive. I'm also curious as to why you need, or think you need, to build a custom kernel in the first place. -- .''`. Stephen Powell : :' : `. `'` `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1700965372.296358.1325817741529.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com
Re: linux-source-3.2.0-rc7
On Friday 06,January,2012 02:37 AM, Wayne Topa wrote: On 01/05/2012 01:16 PM, lina wrote: On 6 Jan, 2012, at 1:51, Camaleónnoela...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 01:18:51 +0800, lina wrote: SNIP May I ask you something? Are there some intelligent package, something like read the lspci and other hardware information. And according the info to vim the .config I don't have much hardware knowledge either, so can't build a specific and light kernel. Last one I build the /lib/module so heavy. That is the best question you have asked! ^_^ 1. Install the debian-reference package. Get ready for a lot of reading. Thanks, I just installed. 2. Install the dww package. Attached the answer to your lspi question dww ? I only found the dwww I really hope this helps you. Thanks, (-: I will read through it in months, to make your hope come true.:-) WT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f06903b.8050...@gmail.com
Re: linux-source-3.2.0-rc7
On Friday 06,January,2012 09:40 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote: On 06/01/12 05:16, lina wrote: snipped Are there some intelligent package, something like read the lspci and other hardware information. And according the info to vim the .config NAFAIK (yet...) though I keep looking and I've started on something similar a few times based on Knoppix and using kudzu. It's on that long list of things to do if I live that long ;-) should I say, long live the scott? Your best bet is probably to set up a stock system that supports all your hardware and also your networking needs. Choose the light, targeted (rather than generic), initrd. Decide whether you intend to build kernel that uses initrd or not (load all modules or have them built in) - then examine loaded modules to see what you need, and remove unneeded built-in kernels. Pretty much the technique used for building kernels for embedded systems. The automated part you're looking for - there are a couple of scripts around that attempt to do this for you, here's one[*1]:- http://andreas.goelzer.de/kernel-config-based-on-lsmod-output Thanks for the link. I did not realize the lsmod can also be used. I don't have much hardware knowledge either, so can't build a specific and light kernel. Last one I build the /lib/module so heavy. You don't really need the hardware knowledge - just to know what you have that you want supported. snipped Cheers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f0691cb.8030...@gmail.com
Re: linux-source-3.2.0-rc7
On Friday 06,January,2012 10:42 AM, Stephen Powell wrote: On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 01:38:23 -0500 (EST), lina wrote: Hi, a quick question, Which header I should choose? linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-all_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-all-amd64_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-amd64_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-common_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-rt-amd64_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb what does the last one mean, rt? and what's the difference among those, Thanks, $ uname -a Linux debian 3.2.0-rc6-3.2-mj-lina #1 SMP Sat Dec 17 13:14:26 SGT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux the one I built from kernel.org a bit heavy, took so much space. I am not sure if I built from debian repository whether it will be light, It appears that you are running a custom kernel, based on the output of uname -a. In that case, none of the above headers will match your kernel. I suggest that you read http://users.wowway.com/~zlinuxman/Kernel.htm Among other things, it will tell you how to build a headers package that goes with the custom kernel. But, depending on why you need, or think you need, a headers package, you may or may not actually need the headers package. For example, if the only reason that you need a headers package is to install the Nvidia proprietary drivers, and you are using the Debian kernel module source packages for the proprietary drivers, and you use kernel-package to produce the custom kernel, then, assuming that you do things properly, you won't need a headers package in the first place. See the above web page for details. It is not short and sweet, but it is thorough and comprehensive. I'm also curious as to why you need, or think you need, to build a custom kernel in the first place. The wireless is not supported, bcm4331. so ... Thanks, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f069580.6040...@gmail.com
linux-source-3.2.0-rc7
Hi, a quick question, Which header I should choose? linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-all_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-all-amd64_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-amd64_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-common_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-rt-amd64_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb what does the last one mean, rt? and what's the difference among those, Thanks, $ uname -a Linux debian 3.2.0-rc6-3.2-mj-lina #1 SMP Sat Dec 17 13:14:26 SGT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux the one I built from kernel.org a bit heavy, took so much space. I am not sure if I built from debian repository whether it will be light, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f05455f.7020...@gmail.com
Re: linux-source-3.2.0-rc7
something abnormal, is it? I used dpkg-buildpackage -j8 Before I buildpackage, there is none so many built out. acpi-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb ata-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb btrfs-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb cdrom-core-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb core-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb crc-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb crypto-dm-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb crypto-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb efi-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb event-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb ext2-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb ext3-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb ext4-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb fat-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb fb-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb firewire-core-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb floppy-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb i2c-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb ide-core-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb ide-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb input-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb irda-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb isofs-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb jfs-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb kernel-image-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb linux-2.6-3.2~rc7 linux-2.6_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.changes linux-2.6_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1.diff.gz linux-2.6_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1.dsc linux-2.6_3.2~rc7.orig.tar.gz linux-doc-3.2_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_all.deb linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-all_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-all-amd64_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-amd64_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-common_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-common-rt_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb linux-headers-3.2.0-rc7-rt-amd64_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb linux-image-3.2.0-rc7-amd64_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb linux-image-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-dbg_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb linux-image-3.2.0-rc7-rt-amd64_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb linux-image-3.2.0-rc7-rt-amd64-dbg_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb linux-libc-dev_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb linux-manual-3.2_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_all.deb linux-patch-debian-3.2_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_all.deb linux-source-3.2_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_all.deb linux-support-3.2.0-rc7_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_all.deb loop-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb md-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb mmc-core-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb mmc-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb mouse-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb multipath-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb nbd-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb nic-extra-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb nic-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb nic-pcmcia-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb nic-shared-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb nic-usb-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb nic-wireless-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb ntfs-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb parport-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb pata-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb pcmcia-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb pcmcia-storage-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb plip-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb ppp-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb qnx4-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb reiserfs-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb sata-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb scsi-common-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb scsi-core-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb scsi-extra-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb scsi-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb serial-modules-3.2.0-rc7-amd64-di_3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.udeb
