Re: new computer and now missing firmware

2017-06-20 Thread Brian
On Tue 20 Jun 2017 at 18:09:33 +0100, Sharon Kimble wrote:

> Georgi Naplatanov  writes:
> 
> > try to install :
> >
> > firmware-linux
> > firmware-misc-nonfree
> > firmware-realtek
> > intel-microcode
> >
> > HTH
> 
> Thanks Georgi for this.
> 
> Since I've installed them its stopped showing that there's missing
> firmware.

Why did you need everything and the kitchen sink?

-- 
Brian.



Re: new computer and now missing firmware

2017-06-20 Thread Sharon Kimble
Georgi Naplatanov <go...@oles.biz> writes:

> On 06/18/2017 11:51 AM, Sharon Kimble wrote:
>> 
>> I've just got a new computer and I'm finding that something isn't
>> loading due to missing driver/s.
>> 
>> Logwatch shows this -
>> 
>> --8<---cut here---start->8---
>>  WARNING:  Kernel Errors Present
>> EXT4-fs (sdd1): error count since last ...:  1 Time(s)
>> EXT4-fs (sdd1): initial error at time 14976229 ...:  1 Time(s)
>> EXT4-fs (sdd1): last error at time 14976440 ...:  1 Time(s)
>> EXT4-fs (sdd1): warning: mounting fs with errors, running e2fsck ...:  1 
>> Time(s)
>> i915 :00:02.0: Direct firmware load for i915/kbl_dmc_ver1_01.bin 
>> failed with error -2 ...:  3 Time(s)
>> intel-lpss: probe of :00:1e.0 failed with error -22 ...:  3 Time(s)
>> nouveau: probe of :01:00.0 failed with error -12 ...:  3 Time(s)
>> r8169 :04:00.0: Direct firmware load for rtl_nic/rtl8168h-2.fw 
>> failed with error -2 ...:  3 Time(s)
>> sd 4:0:0:0: [sdd] Synchronize Cache(10) failed: Result: 
>> hostbyte=DID_ERROR driverbyte=DRIVE ...:  1 Time(s)
>> tpm_crb: probe of MSFT0101:00 failed with error -16 ...:  3 Time(s)
>> --8<---cut here---end--->8---
>> 
>> According to dmidecode my CPU is -
>> 
>> --8<---cut here---start->8---
>> Processor Information
>>  Socket Designation: LGA1151
>>  Type: Central Processor
>>  Family: Core i5
>>  Manufacturer: Intel(R) Corporation
>>  Version: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7500 CPU @ 3.40GHz  
>> --8<---cut here---end--->8---
>> 
>> I have these installed -
>> 
>> ╭
>> │xserver-xorg-video-intel:
>> │  Installed: 2:2.99.917+git20161206-1
>> │  Candidate: 2:2.99.917+git20161206-1
>> │
>> │xserver-xorg-video-nouveau:
>> │  Installed: 1:1.0.13-3
>> │  Candidate: 1:1.0.13-3
>> │
>> │libdrm-nouveau2:
>> │  Installed: 2.4.74-1
>> │  Candidate: 2.4.74-1
>> ╰
>> 
>> When I boot it complains of missing firmware, and I think that's what
>> logwatch is showing. So what do I need to install to get it working
>> nicely please?
>> 
>> The comment about SDD1 is resolved as I've already fscked the drive.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Sharon.
>> 
>
> Hi,
>
> try to install :
>
> firmware-linux
> firmware-misc-nonfree
> firmware-realtek
> intel-microcode
>
> HTH

Thanks Georgi for this.

Since I've installed them its stopped showing that there's missing
firmware.

Thanks
Sharon.
-- 
A taste of linux = http://www.sharons.org.uk
TGmeds = http://www.tgmeds.org.uk
DrugFacts = https://www.drugfacts.org.uk  
Debian 9.0, fluxbox 1.3.5-2, emacs 25.1.1, org-mode 9.0.7


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: new computer and now missing firmware

2017-06-18 Thread Brian
On Sun 18 Jun 2017 at 09:51:21 +0100, Sharon Kimble wrote:

> 
> I've just got a new computer and I'm finding that something isn't
> loading due to missing driver/s.
> 
> Logwatch shows this -
> 
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
>  WARNING:  Kernel Errors Present
> EXT4-fs (sdd1): error count since last ...:  1 Time(s)
> EXT4-fs (sdd1): initial error at time 14976229 ...:  1 Time(s)
> EXT4-fs (sdd1): last error at time 14976440 ...:  1 Time(s)
> EXT4-fs (sdd1): warning: mounting fs with errors, running e2fsck ...:  1 
> Time(s)
> i915 :00:02.0: Direct firmware load for i915/kbl_dmc_ver1_01.bin 
> failed with error -2 ...:  3 Time(s)
> intel-lpss: probe of :00:1e.0 failed with error -22 ...:  3 Time(s)
> nouveau: probe of :01:00.0 failed with error -12 ...:  3 Time(s)
> r8169 :04:00.0: Direct firmware load for rtl_nic/rtl8168h-2.fw failed 
> with error -2 ...:  3 Time(s)

https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages. "Search the contents of packages"
tells you.

--
Brian.



Re: new computer and now missing firmware

2017-06-18 Thread Georgi Naplatanov
On 06/18/2017 11:51 AM, Sharon Kimble wrote:
> 
> I've just got a new computer and I'm finding that something isn't
> loading due to missing driver/s.
> 
> Logwatch shows this -
> 
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
>  WARNING:  Kernel Errors Present
> EXT4-fs (sdd1): error count since last ...:  1 Time(s)
> EXT4-fs (sdd1): initial error at time 14976229 ...:  1 Time(s)
> EXT4-fs (sdd1): last error at time 14976440 ...:  1 Time(s)
> EXT4-fs (sdd1): warning: mounting fs with errors, running e2fsck ...:  1 
> Time(s)
> i915 :00:02.0: Direct firmware load for i915/kbl_dmc_ver1_01.bin 
> failed with error -2 ...:  3 Time(s)
> intel-lpss: probe of :00:1e.0 failed with error -22 ...:  3 Time(s)
> nouveau: probe of :01:00.0 failed with error -12 ...:  3 Time(s)
> r8169 :04:00.0: Direct firmware load for rtl_nic/rtl8168h-2.fw failed 
> with error -2 ...:  3 Time(s)
> sd 4:0:0:0: [sdd] Synchronize Cache(10) failed: Result: 
> hostbyte=DID_ERROR driverbyte=DRIVE ...:  1 Time(s)
> tpm_crb: probe of MSFT0101:00 failed with error -16 ...:  3 Time(s)
> --8<---cut here---end--->8---
> 
> According to dmidecode my CPU is -
> 
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> Processor Information
>   Socket Designation: LGA1151
>   Type: Central Processor
>   Family: Core i5
>   Manufacturer: Intel(R) Corporation
>   Version: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7500 CPU @ 3.40GHz  
> --8<---cut here---end--->8---
> 
> I have these installed -
> 
> ╭
> │xserver-xorg-video-intel:
> │  Installed: 2:2.99.917+git20161206-1
> │  Candidate: 2:2.99.917+git20161206-1
> │
> │xserver-xorg-video-nouveau:
> │  Installed: 1:1.0.13-3
> │  Candidate: 1:1.0.13-3
> │
> │libdrm-nouveau2:
> │  Installed: 2.4.74-1
> │  Candidate: 2.4.74-1
> ╰
> 
> When I boot it complains of missing firmware, and I think that's what
> logwatch is showing. So what do I need to install to get it working
> nicely please?
> 
> The comment about SDD1 is resolved as I've already fscked the drive.
> 
> Thanks
> Sharon.
> 

Hi,

try to install :

firmware-linux
firmware-misc-nonfree
firmware-realtek
intel-microcode

HTH

Kind regards
Georgi



new computer and now missing firmware

2017-06-18 Thread Sharon Kimble

I've just got a new computer and I'm finding that something isn't
loading due to missing driver/s.

Logwatch shows this -

--8<---cut here---start->8---
 WARNING:  Kernel Errors Present
EXT4-fs (sdd1): error count since last ...:  1 Time(s)
EXT4-fs (sdd1): initial error at time 14976229 ...:  1 Time(s)
EXT4-fs (sdd1): last error at time 14976440 ...:  1 Time(s)
EXT4-fs (sdd1): warning: mounting fs with errors, running e2fsck ...:  1 
Time(s)
i915 :00:02.0: Direct firmware load for i915/kbl_dmc_ver1_01.bin failed 
with error -2 ...:  3 Time(s)
intel-lpss: probe of :00:1e.0 failed with error -22 ...:  3 Time(s)
nouveau: probe of :01:00.0 failed with error -12 ...:  3 Time(s)
r8169 :04:00.0: Direct firmware load for rtl_nic/rtl8168h-2.fw failed 
with error -2 ...:  3 Time(s)
sd 4:0:0:0: [sdd] Synchronize Cache(10) failed: Result: hostbyte=DID_ERROR 
driverbyte=DRIVE ...:  1 Time(s)
tpm_crb: probe of MSFT0101:00 failed with error -16 ...:  3 Time(s)
--8<---cut here---end--->8---

According to dmidecode my CPU is -

--8<---cut here---start->8---
Processor Information
Socket Designation: LGA1151
Type: Central Processor
Family: Core i5
Manufacturer: Intel(R) Corporation
Version: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7500 CPU @ 3.40GHz  
--8<---cut here---end--->8---

I have these installed -

╭
│xserver-xorg-video-intel:
│  Installed: 2:2.99.917+git20161206-1
│  Candidate: 2:2.99.917+git20161206-1
│
│xserver-xorg-video-nouveau:
│  Installed: 1:1.0.13-3
│  Candidate: 1:1.0.13-3
│
│libdrm-nouveau2:
│  Installed: 2.4.74-1
│  Candidate: 2.4.74-1
╰

When I boot it complains of missing firmware, and I think that's what
logwatch is showing. So what do I need to install to get it working
nicely please?

The comment about SDD1 is resolved as I've already fscked the drive.

Thanks
Sharon.
-- 
A taste of linux = http://www.sharons.org.uk
TGmeds = http://www.tgmeds.org.uk
DrugFacts = https://www.drugfacts.org.uk  
Debian 9.0, fluxbox 1.3.5-2, emacs 25.1.1, org-mode 9.0.7


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


New computer

2014-06-18 Thread Steve Litt
Hi all,

I just bought a new computer, going cheap instead of going top of the
line. It has a 4.1Ghz dual AMD FM2 processor, 16GB of RAM, and ASUS
mobo, and I'll be doing both business computing and experimental virtual
machines on it.

All my previous daily driver business machines have been either
Mandrake/Mandriva or Ubuntu/Xubuntu, but I'm going to see if I can make
this one Debian Stable in order to free myself from Plymouth and
lightdm.

I'll keep you in the loop as this project proceeds forward. I'm going
to do it slowly and carefully, because my entire business will depend on
this machine.

Thanks,

SteveT

Steve Litt*  http://www.troubleshooters.com/
Troubleshooting Training  *  Human Performance


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140618160840.1d3eccc3@mydesk



Re: New computer

2014-06-18 Thread Артур Истомин
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 04:08:40PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 I just bought a new computer, going cheap instead of going top of the
 line. It has a 4.1Ghz dual AMD FM2 processor, 16GB of RAM, and ASUS
 mobo, and I'll be doing both business computing and experimental virtual
 machines on it.
 
 All my previous daily driver business machines have been either
 Mandrake/Mandriva or Ubuntu/Xubuntu, but I'm going to see if I can make
 this one Debian Stable in order to free myself from Plymouth and
 lightdm.
 
 I'll keep you in the loop as this project proceeds forward. I'm going
 to do it slowly and carefully, because my entire business will depend on
 this machine.

what a cute boy..


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140618202244.GE6631@localhost



Re: New computer

2014-06-18 Thread David Guntner
Sounds like an interesting project! I look forward to seeing the results!

  --Dave

-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail.
Please excuse my brevity  lack of my usual quote-and-reply style.

On June 18, 2014 1:08:40 PM PDT, Steve Litt sl...@troubleshooters.com wrote:
Hi all,

I just bought a new computer, going cheap instead of going top of the
line. It has a 4.1Ghz dual AMD FM2 processor, 16GB of RAM, and ASUS
mobo, and I'll be doing both business computing and experimental
virtual
machines on it.

All my previous daily driver business machines have been either
Mandrake/Mandriva or Ubuntu/Xubuntu, but I'm going to see if I can make
this one Debian Stable in order to free myself from Plymouth and
lightdm.

I'll keep you in the loop as this project proceeds forward. I'm going
to do it slowly and carefully, because my entire business will depend
on
this machine.

Thanks,

SteveT

Steve Litt*  http://www.troubleshooters.com/
Troubleshooting Training  *  Human Performance


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/075b3cc9-176e-41f9-ac8b-fec79ba91...@email.android.com



Re: New computer

2014-06-18 Thread Bzzzz
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 20:22:44 +
Артур Истомин art.is...@yandex.ru wrote:

 what a cute boy..

May be a little anxiety: won't my capacitors 
be in heat this summer (or perhaps the fear 
of the black screen of death that kills:)

-- 
What is called liberty, in poliotics language, is the right
to make laws; in other words, enchaining liberty.
-- Auguste Vermorel


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: New computer planned

2012-02-27 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Vi, 24 feb 12, 15:34:51, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
 
 I recommend Wheezy for Sandybridge. For Squeeze you´d need recent 
 backports of kernel, X.org and mesa.

Which are available in backports.

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: New computer planned

2012-02-27 Thread Andreas Weber
Funny enough nobody talked about energy consumption yet. If you would
buy a car or any other device, this would immediately be a point worth
considering, wouldn't it?

I suggest you buy a Mac Mini (-Server if you like to have 2 disks).

- works fine with Debian
- uses only a fraction of power compared to others
- is *very* small
- is *extremely* quiet
- has all necessary connectors
- you can connect any peripherals you like
- has all wireless stuff built-in
- has a card reader built-in
- has fine 3D power graphics (Tuxracer runs very fine)

Should I go on? And if you do so, you'll get flamed by _everyone_ for
the rest of your life for using a superior OS on superior hardware. ;-)

HTH, ändu


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f4b8170.7050...@worldwideweber.ch



Re: New computer planned. Now: New computer delivered.

2012-02-27 Thread Sian Mountbatten
Ralf Mardorf wrote:

 On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 20:00 -0500, Celejar wrote:
 On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:22:32 +0100
 Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de wrote:
 
  Am Dienstag, 21. Februar 2012 schrieb Celejar:
   Curt Howland howl...@priss.com wrote:
Well, I have the new computer and booting up is definitely faster.
As it happened, both HDDs in my old computer were IDE, so because the 
new motherboard only has SATA connectors, I only have the SSD.

One problem. The Wifi card is a RealTek TL-WN781ND which according to 
my web search for Linux drivers, is based on an Ath9K chip. Anyone 
know how to get Wifi working for this Wifi card? The mini-CD provided 
with the board has drivers for Windoze only. So my desktop, which is 
whisper quiet, is just sitting not being used because of the lack of a 
driver for the Wifi card.
-- 
Sian Mountbatten
Algol 68 specialist


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jig4qh$pmq$1...@speranza.aioe.org



Re: New computer planned. Now: New computer delivered.

2012-02-27 Thread Kelly Clowers
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 06:43, Sian Mountbatten
poenik...@fastmail.co.uk wrote:

 One problem. The Wifi card is a RealTek TL-WN781ND

You mean TP-Link TL-WN781ND
RealTek is a wifi (and other) chip manufacture, not a card maker.
Atheros is the the chip make for this one.

 which according to
 my web search for Linux drivers, is based on an Ath9K chip. Anyone
 know how to get Wifi working for this Wifi card?

http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k

Any kernel newer than 2.6.32 has Ath9k by default.
A newer kernel might have better/more specific support
for that card.

Cheers,
Kelly Clowers


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAFoWM=8SQKNbsKNL84X+21i1Jj9OKyjfNK9qmE5RBVu3GTB=c...@mail.gmail.com



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-27 Thread Tom H
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Andreas Weber ae...@worldwideweber.ch wrote:

 Funny enough nobody talked about energy consumption yet. If you would
 buy a car or any other device, this would immediately be a point worth
 considering, wouldn't it?

 I suggest you buy a Mac Mini (-Server if you like to have 2 disks).

 - works fine with Debian
 - uses only a fraction of power compared to others
 - is *very* small
 - is *extremely* quiet
 - has all necessary connectors
 - you can connect any peripherals you like
 - has all wireless stuff built-in
 - has a card reader built-in
 - has fine 3D power graphics (Tuxracer runs very fine)

 Should I go on? And if you do so, you'll get flamed by _everyone_ for
 the rest of your life for using a superior OS on superior hardware. ;-)

Superior hardware?! The enclosure might be insanely great but the
innards are the same as any other x86 PC.

If I were buying a Mac Mini, I'd buy the lowest spec disk and upgrade
it myself because Apple makes you pay through the nose for disk/RAM
upgrades... (I'm assuming that you can buy a single-disk Mac Mini and
add a second disk!)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=Syu=gfm6mueein1jx8nrqp2ttfrpgtve3pqb7h8r-p...@mail.gmail.com



Re: New computer planned. Now: New computer delivered.

2012-02-27 Thread Doug

On 02/27/2012 09:43 AM, Sian Mountbatten wrote:

Ralf Mardorf wrote:


On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 20:00 -0500, Celejar wrote:

On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:22:32 +0100
Martin Steigerwaldmar...@lichtvoll.de  wrote:


Am Dienstag, 21. Februar 2012 schrieb Celejar:

Curt Howlandhowl...@priss.com  wrote:

Well, I have the new computer and booting up is definitely faster.
As it happened, both HDDs in my old computer were IDE, so because the
new motherboard only has SATA connectors, I only have the SSD.

/snip/
If you have a slot available, there are plug-in cards for IDE drives,
not very expensive. YOu can get single port or two port, but as
you know, a single port will support two drives, master and slave.

--doug


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f4bc363.9040...@optonline.net



Re: New computer planned. Now: New computer delivered.

2012-02-27 Thread Kelly Clowers
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 09:54, Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote:
 On 02/27/2012 09:43 AM, Sian Mountbatten wrote:

 Ralf Mardorf wrote:

 On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 20:00 -0500, Celejar wrote:

 On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:22:32 +0100
 Martin Steigerwaldmar...@lichtvoll.de  wrote:

 Am Dienstag, 21. Februar 2012 schrieb Celejar:

 Curt Howlandhowl...@priss.com  wrote:

 Well, I have the new computer and booting up is definitely faster.
 As it happened, both HDDs in my old computer were IDE, so because the
 new motherboard only has SATA connectors, I only have the SSD.

 /snip/
 If you have a slot available, there are plug-in cards for IDE drives,
 not very expensive. YOu can get single port or two port, but as
 you know, a single port will support two drives, master and slave.

Or there are little PATA to SATA adapters that plug into the back of
the PATA device. I used one once for a while, it worked fine.

Cheers,
Kelly Clowers


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAFoWM=8=CVeP+8O=n6b52iBkE2jtOCp8vdRWq8gOf=jxhru...@mail.gmail.com



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-27 Thread Celejar
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:35:41 +0100
Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:

 On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 20:00 -0500, Celejar wrote:
  On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:22:32 +0100
  Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de wrote:
  
   Am Dienstag, 21. Februar 2012 schrieb Celejar:
Curt Howland howl...@priss.com wrote:

...

 It is my understanding that the Intel-based graphics cards work
 perfectly well with the standard Linux drivers, if you want to stay
 purely open-source.

That's what everyone says, but it's not as true as it might be. Squeeze
is shipping X stuff / drivers that cause GPU crashes on my (2007 era)
Thinkpad T61 with Intel GM965 graphics:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44478
   
   Did you every try with backported X stuff and drivers if available? Or 
   Wheezy?
  
  Yes - I updated my X stuff from backports, and I haven't seen the
  problem since.
  
   Squeeze stuff is rather old by now.
  
  Fair enough - I'm just saying that perhaps we shouldn't go around
  saying that linux support for Intel is perfect, when Debian stable is
  shipping badly broken software for mature and not obsolete hardware.
  
  Celejar
 
 To funny, I didn't read all Debian digest, but marked them as To Do,
 while we had a discussion on Linux audio users list about the dropped nv
 driver. We, the Linux community seemingly are trapped into a graphics
 issue. I like to cross post this and I won't add any comment.
 
 Anyway, please take a look at
 http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/2012-February/date.html
  , thread Linux 3.2.0-rt Kernels on Debian Repos!.

What should I see there? I took a quick look, and am not sure what you
mean.

 I can't resist: :D ... :p,

Celejar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120227230358.3cfd8450.cele...@gmail.com



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-26 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 20:00 -0500, Celejar wrote:
 On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:22:32 +0100
 Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de wrote:
 
  Am Dienstag, 21. Februar 2012 schrieb Celejar:
   Curt Howland howl...@priss.com wrote:
   
   ...
   
It is my understanding that the Intel-based graphics cards work
perfectly well with the standard Linux drivers, if you want to stay
purely open-source.
   
   That's what everyone says, but it's not as true as it might be. Squeeze
   is shipping X stuff / drivers that cause GPU crashes on my (2007 era)
   Thinkpad T61 with Intel GM965 graphics:
   
   https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44478
  
  Did you every try with backported X stuff and drivers if available? Or 
  Wheezy?
 
 Yes - I updated my X stuff from backports, and I haven't seen the
 problem since.
 
  Squeeze stuff is rather old by now.
 
 Fair enough - I'm just saying that perhaps we shouldn't go around
 saying that linux support for Intel is perfect, when Debian stable is
 shipping badly broken software for mature and not obsolete hardware.
 
 Celejar

To funny, I didn't read all Debian digest, but marked them as To Do,
while we had a discussion on Linux audio users list about the dropped nv
driver. We, the Linux community seemingly are trapped into a graphics
issue. I like to cross post this and I won't add any comment.

Anyway, please take a look at
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/2012-February/date.html 
, thread Linux 3.2.0-rt Kernels on Debian Repos!.

I can't resist: :D ... :p,
Ralf


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1330245341.1234.34.camel@localhost.localdomain



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-26 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 06:03 +0100, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
 Celejar wrote:
 
  Squeeze stuff is rather old by now.
  
  Fair enough - I'm just saying that perhaps we shouldn't go around
  saying that linux support for Intel is perfect, when Debian stable is
  shipping badly broken software for mature and not obsolete hardware.
  
 Well, this is the way the debian release cycle works. If you want a
 distro with a fixed six month release period, then you may be better
 off with ubuntu. In case you just need more recent versions of stuff, 
 there is always testing, which is not as fragile as it sounds.
   
 ---)kaimartin(---

Again, read
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/2012-February/date.html 
, thread Linux 3.2.0-rt Kernels on Debian Repos!.

What Debian should we install, to get a working system?

Go with stable if you use NVIDIA, you are an idiot if you use NVIDIA,
use Intel and install Debian, but not stable :D???

Cool! I dropped my Debian install for other reasons.

- Ralf


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1330246349.1234.38.camel@localhost.localdomain



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-26 Thread Celejar
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 06:03:46 +0100
Kai-Martin Knaak k...@lilalaser.de wrote:

 Celejar wrote:
 
  Squeeze stuff is rather old by now.
  
  Fair enough - I'm just saying that perhaps we shouldn't go around
  saying that linux support for Intel is perfect, when Debian stable is
  shipping badly broken software for mature and not obsolete hardware.
  
 Well, this is the way the debian release cycle works. If you want a
 distro with a fixed six month release period, then you may be better
 off with ubuntu. In case you just need more recent versions of stuff, 
 there is always testing, which is not as fragile as it sounds.

I understand the Debian release cycle, and have understood it for
years, along with the tradeoffs involved in choosing the various
flavors. Once again, I'm just pointing out that we shouldn't go around
telling everyone that support for Intel hardware is so idyllic if our
Stable version doesn't support mature, non-obsolete, popular chipsets.

Celejar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120226082536.dcd64df4.cele...@gmail.com



Re: [LAU] New computer planned

2012-02-26 Thread Robin Gareus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 02/26/2012 09:52 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
[..]
 What Debian should we install, to get a working system?
 
 Go with stable if you use NVIDIA, you are an idiot if you use NVIDIA,
 use Intel and install Debian, but not stable :D???

http://jaqque.sbih.org/kplug/apt-pinning.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk9KNPQACgkQeVUk8U+VK0KV+gCfbd0LIWKEC7Q5gkGqRwhkJqDc
vTgAnRNeM4OqR53+0t9S65y+/g9FTmma
=chuZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f4a34f5.1080...@gareus.org



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-26 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
Doug wrote:

 This may be heretical for this list, but there are other distros in
 the world.
 I like PCLinuxOS, which is a rolling release, and is always up to
 date, if you just remember to update it once a week or so.

sounds like debian/testing :-)
With debian/stesing there is a benefit: You can stop updating once
testing is declared stable. 

---)kaimartin(---
-- 
Kai-Martin Knaak
Email: k...@familieknaak.de
Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel:
http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6C0B9F53


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jieghb$js9$1...@dough.gmane.org



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-26 Thread Doug

On 02/26/2012 06:50 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:

Doug wrote:


This may be heretical for this list, but there are other distros in
the world.
I like PCLinuxOS, which is a rolling release, and is always up to
date, if you just remember to update it once a week or so.

sounds like debian/testing :-)
With debian/stesing there is a benefit: You can stop updating once
testing is declared stable.

---)kaimartin(---
At the point where it is declared stable then nothing will be updated 
until

six months?  I'd rather have my system updated every week, if you don't
mind.  --doug


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f4ad5b2.2040...@optonline.net



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-26 Thread Miles Bader
Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net writes:
 I like PCLinuxOS, which is a rolling release, and is always up to
 date, if you just remember to update it once a week or so.
 
 sounds like debian/testing :-)
 With debian/stesing there is a benefit: You can stop updating once
 testing is declared stable.

 At the point where it is declared stable then nothing will be
 updated until six months?  I'd rather have my system updated every
 week, if you don't mind.  --doug

testing is always rolling, but somewhat slowly and carefully.
unstable is always rolling, much more quickly.
unstable+experimental is always rolling, on the razor's edge.

_Or_ you can target a specific release name, in which case you'll get a
rolling release as long as that release is in testing, transitioning
to a static release when that release becomes stable.

Debian is very, very, flexible...

-miles

-- 
Opportunity, n. A favorable occasion for grasping a disappointment.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87y5rp9h87@catnip.gol.com



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-25 Thread Celejar
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:22:32 +0100
Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de wrote:

 Am Dienstag, 21. Februar 2012 schrieb Celejar:
  Curt Howland howl...@priss.com wrote:
  
  ...
  
   It is my understanding that the Intel-based graphics cards work
   perfectly well with the standard Linux drivers, if you want to stay
   purely open-source.
  
  That's what everyone says, but it's not as true as it might be. Squeeze
  is shipping X stuff / drivers that cause GPU crashes on my (2007 era)
  Thinkpad T61 with Intel GM965 graphics:
  
  https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44478
 
 Did you every try with backported X stuff and drivers if available? Or 
 Wheezy?

Yes - I updated my X stuff from backports, and I haven't seen the
problem since.

 Squeeze stuff is rather old by now.

Fair enough - I'm just saying that perhaps we shouldn't go around
saying that linux support for Intel is perfect, when Debian stable is
shipping badly broken software for mature and not obsolete hardware.

Celejar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120225200027.968d7c35.cele...@gmail.com



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-25 Thread Celejar
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:50:21 -0500
Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote:

 On 02/24/2012 09:22 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
  Am Dienstag, 21. Februar 2012 schrieb Celejar:
  Curt Howlandhowl...@priss.com  wrote:
 
  ...
 
  It is my understanding that the Intel-based graphics cards work
  perfectly well with the standard Linux drivers, if you want to stay
  purely open-source.
  That's what everyone says, but it's not as true as it might be. Squeeze
  is shipping X stuff / drivers that cause GPU crashes on my (2007 era)
  Thinkpad T61 with Intel GM965 graphics:
 
  https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44478
 
 /snip/
 
 Just a little philosophy here:  You may have groked, by now, that there 
 is a fanatical fringe of Linux users
 who would not use anything but Open Source software that is not 
 encumbered by a manufacturer's name,
 like NVidia, or Mozilla, etc.  You may or may not be in that group, but 
 if you are not, then don't let those
 who are beat you down.  Use what works!  (Just as some of us use Windows 
 when it's reasonable to do so.
 For instance, if you have Photoshop on your Win machine, it would be 
 plain stupid to force yourself into
 using Gimp, and if you have AutoCad, why fool with lesser programs that 
 may be free/open-source, but
 not only don't have all the capability, but would require you to learn a 
 new paradigm to use them. And I
 wait in hope for Corel to bring WordPerfect back to Linux, but for 
 serious writing, I will cheerfully go to
 Windows, where it lives.  Not free.  Not open-source.  Works!)
 
 /rant off

Understood - I'm not in the fanatical fringe (although I'm somewhat
sympathetic to them), but I was just disappointed to find that the
system I purchased, with its vaunted Intel graphics, was crashing under
Debian.

Celejar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120225200236.ee98f9d0.cele...@gmail.com



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-25 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
Celejar wrote:

 Squeeze stuff is rather old by now.
 
 Fair enough - I'm just saying that perhaps we shouldn't go around
 saying that linux support for Intel is perfect, when Debian stable is
 shipping badly broken software for mature and not obsolete hardware.
 
Well, this is the way the debian release cycle works. If you want a
distro with a fixed six month release period, then you may be better
off with ubuntu. In case you just need more recent versions of stuff, 
there is always testing, which is not as fragile as it sounds.
  
---)kaimartin(---
-- 
Kai-Martin Knaak
Email: k...@familieknaak.de
Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel:
http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6C0B9F53


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jiceg7$1dd$1...@dough.gmane.org



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-25 Thread Doug

On 02/26/2012 12:03 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:

Celejar wrote:


Squeeze stuff is rather old by now.

Fair enough - I'm just saying that perhaps we shouldn't go around
saying that linux support for Intel is perfect, when Debian stable is
shipping badly broken software for mature and not obsolete hardware.


Well, this is the way the debian release cycle works. If you want a
distro with a fixed six month release period, then you may be better
off with ubuntu. In case you just need more recent versions of stuff,
there is always testing, which is not as fragile as it sounds.

---)kaimartin(---
This may be heretical for this list, but there are other distros in the 
world.
I like PCLinuxOS, which is a rolling release, and is always up to date, 
if you

just remember to update it once a week or so.  And it's KDE, so it has
a reasonably familiar interface, unlike present-day Ubuntu.  (Altho there
are other desktops available for it.)

http://www.pclinuxos.com/?page_id=10

--doug


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f49d3e2.1070...@optonline.net



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-24 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Montag, 20. Februar 2012 schrieb Andrei POPESCU:
   On Lu, 20 feb 12, 14:19:36, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
  My desktop computer is nearly 7 years old and I'm thinking that a
  new computer using some of the hardware improvements would be a good
  thing.
 
  
 
  So I'm going to ask my friendly computer consultant, who is only
  downstairs from me, to build me a computer with hardware 3d
  acceleration, solid-state drive, 8Gb RAM. What else should I ask for
  and what works with Linux? He's going to give me a list of the
  hardware he is going to install, so I can check Linux compatibility.
  Although I am not a gamer, I would like to run tuxracer which really
  needs 3d acceleration to work. Any suggestions will be welcome.
 
 First decision: proprietary drivers or not
 
 For proprietary I'd chose nVidia cards over ATI anytime. While I can't 
 comment on the driver itself, the packaging for nvidia over fglrx in 
 Debian is superior (several generations supported, pre-built modules
 for  stable, backports, responsive maintainers, etc.).
 
 If you definitely don't want to use proprietary drivers you can also 
 consider Intel cards (or even built-in), since I expect the
 performance  of either nVidia or ATI cards with the free drivers to be
 comparable with Intel.
 
 OTOH I doubt tuxracer has very high 3d performance requirements.

Extreme Tuxracer plays nicely here in Full HD on Intel Sandybridge as well 
as Supertuxkart - the later except some sudden stuttering for a few 
seconds every now and then the last time I played it, but that seems to be 
a driver issue and might be fixed meanwhile. 

When deciding to go with Intel and its not that important to buy the new 
computer now, it might even be worthwhile to wait for 2 to 3 months in 
order to buy a computer with the new Ivybridge. It has even faster 
internal graphics. From the raw CPU speed there should not be that much of 
a difference between the two architectures as far as I read. Using 
Ivybridge will require new kernel and driver versions, but even for 
Sandybridge Debian Squeeze is too old unless backported X.org, Kernel and 
Mesa drivers in suitable versions exist. Kernel 3.2 is backported, I am 
not sure about the other ones.

Ciao,
-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201202241519.06742.mar...@lichtvoll.de



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-24 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Dienstag, 21. Februar 2012 schrieb Celejar:
 Curt Howland howl...@priss.com wrote:
 
 ...
 
  It is my understanding that the Intel-based graphics cards work
  perfectly well with the standard Linux drivers, if you want to stay
  purely open-source.
 
 That's what everyone says, but it's not as true as it might be. Squeeze
 is shipping X stuff / drivers that cause GPU crashes on my (2007 era)
 Thinkpad T61 with Intel GM965 graphics:
 
 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44478

Did you every try with backported X stuff and drivers if available? Or 
Wheezy?

Squeeze stuff is rather old by now.

Well as for what you´d buy today: The Intel drivers work quite well for 
Sandybridge in the meanwhile.

-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201202241522.32289.mar...@lichtvoll.de



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-24 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Montag, 20. Februar 2012 schrieb Andrei POPESCU:
 On Lu, 20 feb 12, 17:09:45, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
  On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 16:58 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
   On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 16:58 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
If you definitely don't want to use proprietary drivers you can
also consider Intel cards (or even built-in)
  
  Do they have 3D support?
 
 Yes, but not as good as nVidia/ATI.

Driverwise or hardwarewise?

Hardwarewise they are slower than recent dedicated gfx cards.

Driverwise the support is excellent for opensource drivers.

Compared to proprietary NVidia driver, maybe also proprietary ATI driver 
its still lacking when it comes to supported OpenGL features.

-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201202241531.06472.mar...@lichtvoll.de



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-24 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Montag, 20. Februar 2012 schrieb David Christensen:
 On 02/20/2012 06:58 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
  If you definitely don't want to use proprietary drivers you can also
  consider Intel cards (or even built-in),
 
 I prefer full FOSS HW support OOTB and have had the best experiences
 with Intel processors and integrated motherboards (video, sound,
 PATA/SATA, LAN, serial, parallel, PS/2, USB, etc.).
 
 
 Does Squeeze have full FOSS HW support OOTB for the Intel
 Second-Generation Core processors and Q67 chipset motherboards?  Does
 Wheezy?  Sid?  As other posters have mentioned, checking HCL's is
 difficult at best.

I recommend Wheezy for Sandybridge. For Squeeze you´d need recent 
backports of kernel, X.org and mesa.

 I'm considering building a Debian Gnome 64-bit desktop and a Debian Xen
 or XCP 64-bit server using i5-2500S processors and DQ67SW motherboards:
 
 
 http://ark.intel.com/products/52211/Intel-Core-i5-2500S-Processor-%286M
 -Cache-2_70-GHz%29
 
  http://ark.intel.com/products/51997/Intel-Desktop-Board-DQ67SW
 
 Any comments from people running Debian, Gnome, Xen, or XCP on these
 parts?

I only run on laptop so far. Here with Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2520M CPU @ 
2.50GHz dualcore with hyperthreading. It rocks.

I suggest using a SSD with that ;).

Ciao,
-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201202241534.51279.mar...@lichtvoll.de



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-24 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Montag, 20. Februar 2012 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
 On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 10:17 -0500, Allan Wind wrote:
  Memory is cheap.  More is better as Linux uses it for disk cache 
  if nothing else.
 
 For heavy audio production I never noticed that even the swap gets
 touched with 4GB RAM.

That does not give any clue whether Linux would use more RAM as disk cache 
if it had it. Linux might not touch swap yet even when it would utilize 
more RAM for disk caching and thus be faster with more RAM.

Well lets have a closer look on a 8 GB machine:

martin@merkaba:~ free -m 
 total   used   free sharedbuffers cached
Mem:  7783   4559   3223  0201   1082
-/+ buffers/cache:   3275   4507
Swap:12287282  12005

Already here Linux utilizes more than 4 GB of RAM. But it doesn´t use all 
8 GB of RAM, not even for disk caches. But after waking up from 
hibernation to disk it was not running for long today.

One KDE 4.7.4 session, Kontact, KMail, some other small apps.

Now I start LibreOffice Writer 3.4.5 and Iceweasel 10:

martin@merkaba:~ free -m
 total   used   free sharedbuffers cached
Mem:  7783   4891   2891  0202   1302
-/+ buffers/cache:   3386   4397
Swap:12287281  12006

Linux continues to utilize even more memory.

Minus caching already 3,3 GB RAM is in use. So with 4 GB RAM there would 
not be much space for disk caching. Granted that some applications might 
be less greedy with memory allocations when not so much of it is 
available.


So while 4 GB would work for a KDE session with some apps, heck even 2 GB 
would work, 8 GB should give some performance boost - possibly rather 
little, considering that the Intel SSD 320 in that ThinkPad T520 is quite 
fast for an SATA 300 SSD. But still RAM is an order of magnitude faster. 
10 times at least compared to an SSD. More than that for a harddisk.

Given the price of RAM I would put 8 GB in for 64 bit Linux. At least I 
would make sure that I have the option to do it later. Which should be 
true for any recent desktop/tower motherboard - when its not for Atom or 
something like that.

-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201202241547.04483.mar...@lichtvoll.de



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-24 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Montag, 20. Februar 2012 schrieb Andrei POPESCU:
 On Lu, 20 feb 12, 16:29:18, Doug wrote:
  You need a real mechanical hard drive.  The solid-state drives have
  a  limited read/write cycle.
 
 Recent studies seem to suggest that the limited read/write cycles are
 unlikely to affect normal usage.

Intel SSD 320 is specced a useful life of at least 5 years at up to 20 GB 
host writes each day.¹

Intel has a rather low annual failure rate.² Once I read some article 
about numbers from other vendors with have been higher, but I do not 
remember what it was anymore.

Still 0,4% annual failure rate for X25-M is 4 drives out of 1000 in one 
year and it is always good to keep a backup! I have not yet seen numbers 
for Intel SSD 320 tough and they have had and probably even still have a 8 
MB bug. Search Heise Open for that, they have a good article on it.

Well I am not more worried than with harddisks. And up to now not even one 
harddisks in my private use ever really failed. One Samsung 2,5 inch 
thought it had SMART errors after some sudden power losses, but even that 
one still worked. I had it replaced anyway.

[1] http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/solid-state-drives/ssd-320-
specification.html

[2] http://www.anandtech.com/show/4244/intel-ssd-320-review

Ciao,
-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201202241559.28716.mar...@lichtvoll.de



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-24 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Freitag, 24. Februar 2012 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
 Still 0,4% annual failure rate for X25-M is 4 drives out of 1000 in
 one  year and it is always good to keep a backup! I have not yet seen
 numbers for Intel SSD 320 tough and they have had and probably even
 still have a 8 MB bug. Search Heise Open for that, they have a good
 article on it.

On sudden power loss. Quite rarely. But when it happens the SSD reports 
its 8 MB big and needs to be replaced.

Ironically AFAIC it comes from an issue related to the capacitors on the 
SSD that should allow the SSD to complete pending writes in case of a 
power loss.

There has been a firmware update that I applied. But it has not been clear, 
whether it really fixes the issue even when it should.

Well, this one still works ;). And the laptop has a battery in it.

-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201202241603.22128.mar...@lichtvoll.de



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-24 Thread Doug

On 02/24/2012 09:22 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:

Am Dienstag, 21. Februar 2012 schrieb Celejar:

Curt Howlandhowl...@priss.com  wrote:

...


It is my understanding that the Intel-based graphics cards work
perfectly well with the standard Linux drivers, if you want to stay
purely open-source.

That's what everyone says, but it's not as true as it might be. Squeeze
is shipping X stuff / drivers that cause GPU crashes on my (2007 era)
Thinkpad T61 with Intel GM965 graphics:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44478



/snip/

Just a little philosophy here:  You may have groked, by now, that there 
is a fanatical fringe of Linux users
who would not use anything but Open Source software that is not 
encumbered by a manufacturer's name,
like NVidia, or Mozilla, etc.  You may or may not be in that group, but 
if you are not, then don't let those
who are beat you down.  Use what works!  (Just as some of us use Windows 
when it's reasonable to do so.
For instance, if you have Photoshop on your Win machine, it would be 
plain stupid to force yourself into
using Gimp, and if you have AutoCad, why fool with lesser programs that 
may be free/open-source, but
not only don't have all the capability, but would require you to learn a 
new paradigm to use them. And I
wait in hope for Corel to bring WordPerfect back to Linux, but for 
serious writing, I will cheerfully go to

Windows, where it lives.  Not free.  Not open-source.  Works!)

/rant off

--doug


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f47e9fd.7030...@optonline.net



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-24 Thread David Christensen

On 02/24/2012 06:34 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:

I recommend Wheezy for Sandybridge. For Squeeze you´d need recent
backports of kernel, X.org and mesa.


That's what I thought.  Thanks for the confirmation.  :-)


David


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f484f6b.7070...@holgerdanske.com



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-23 Thread Miles Bader
Curt Howland howl...@priss.com writes:
 The only thing I did for Linux compatibility was to not get on-board
 graphics. I bought an Nvidia-based graphics card that was not
 bleeding edge, even though it's got 3D acceleration. The card has
 it's own RAM, so system RAM is not shared, which is a very good thing,
 and it drives 3D games perfectly well using the Nvidia supplied
 graphics driver.

 It is my understanding that the Intel-based graphics cards work
 perfectly well with the standard Linux drivers, if you want to stay
 purely open-source.

Radeon GPUs also seem to work pretty much flawlessly with the default
free drivers these days.

-miles

-- 
Love is the difficult realization that something other than oneself is real.
[Iris Murdoch]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/buoaa49kint@dhlpc061.dev.necel.com



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-22 Thread Monsieur Louk
I wouldn't worry about SSD failure. At least, not as much as one usually
worries about HDD failure :)

The guys at hardware.fr did a nice experiment: they set up a computer to do
continuous write-erase cycles on an SSD in order to see how long it would
last, and when performance decreases would start. The drive handled about
600 TB of write operations before it started to show problems. I think
you'll admit this is enough for average usage.

The 8800GT though, that's another story. It's kind of an outdated GPU, not
one I'd put in a recent PC, especially one that comes at £599. Bear in mind
there are no really expensive hardware except the SSD. I think you could
haggle a bit on the price and/or ask for a higher-end/more modern GPU :)

If you really want to be picky, the Crucial M4 series of SSDs got better
reviews than the Agility 3 series. That and the fact OCZ has got a bit of
bad rep for their customer service (although that will be your colleague's
problem, not yours).


Re: New computer planned

2012-02-22 Thread Sian Mountbatten

Andrei POPESCU wrote:

On Ma, 21 feb 12, 22:58:03, Sian Mountbatten wrote:

It will have Intel Core i5-2400 3.10GHz Socket LGA1155, MSI Z68S REV
B3 motherboard, 8GB DDR3 1600MHz RAM, Nvidia GeForce 8800GT 256MB
PCI-Express graphics, an SSD OCZ Agility 3 120GB 2.5 SATA instead
of a hard disk drive, a Samsung DVD-RW SATA, Onboard 7.1 channel HD
Audio, Onboard 10/100/1000 Mbps Lan, 802.11B/G/N WiFi, an ATX +
Cooler Master 450W PSU and NO OS. He knows I use Linux. He's going
to charge me £599 and I think it's worth the money, because if
anything goes wrong, he's just downstairs.


Just two comments:

- only 256 MB seems low by todays standards
- do you need WiFi?

Kind regards,
Andrei
Wifi: yes. I do not have broadband. The consultant has a Wifi network 
which I can pick up in my living room. So I get broadband access for 
only £6/month. Pretty good considering that there are no download 
limitations. And unless the internet is really busy, I get as much as 
1.8MB/sec download speed. Considering that I do not download films, I 
reckon that my online usage is reasonable.


I'm a pretty small player in the internet stakes. Apart from downloading 
ISOs to install Linux from, and packages from Debian, I don't do much 
downloading.


I don't even have a landline telephone. Just a mobile. So broadband 
access is very cheap for me. I have no complaints about the setup. And 
my mobile phone is not on a contract: I just pay for my calls by direct 
debit. My monthly mobile phone payment is usually less than £10. So I 
can't complain!


Regards
--
Sian Mountbatten
Algol 68 specialist (www.poenikatu.co.uk)


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ji2bv5$q17$1...@speranza.aioe.org



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-22 Thread Randy Kramer
Sian (and all),

Congratulations on the work you've done with Algol, Literate Programming, and 
such!  Those are all interests of mine, as well,   (Well, from Algol, I 
eventually moved on to Pascal, and never really grokked C/C++, although I'm 
still making sporadic efforts to learn enough C++ to write a lexer for the 
TWiki markup language for the Scintilla family of editors.)

I'd be interested in seeing what you've done with Literate Programming--part 
of what I'm doing with TWiki markup and a lexer for Scintilla has literate 
programming as one of its goals.

I tried (briefly) looking at your web site for something about your literate 
progamming system, but did not notice anything.

Randy Kramer

PS: I've cc'd you because the list is so busy--if you respond to me and want 
me to see it, I'd request you do the same--I don't always read (or even skim) 
the list--usually only after I've asked a question and am watching for an 
answer.

On Tuesday 21 February 2012 05:58:03 pm Sian Mountbatten wrote:
 On the software development front, I use the programming language Algol
 68, which is a high-level language. C is a medium-level language. I have
 spent years in porting an old compiler to Linux, providing a decent
 run-time system and even writing a 600-page book to teach the language
 from scratch. I have developed my own Literate Programming System which
 I shall be completing during the coming months. I have written an Algol
 68 binding to the Xforms library so that it is possible to write GUI
 programs without any bother. And, more recently, I now have a web-site
 with more than 150 pages for the book, as well as a manual for the
 software development system I use. The site is in my signature.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201202220824.14609.rhkra...@gmail.com



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-22 Thread Kelly Clowers
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 01:19, Sian Mountbatten
poenik...@fastmail.co.uk wrote:

 Wifi: yes. I do not have broadband. The consultant has a Wifi network which
 I can pick up in my living room.

Ah, I did not see this when I wrote my response.

Check on the card/chipset. As I said, drivers can still be iffy,
though much better than they used to be.

I would go with chips from Atheros or Intel, personally.


Cheers,
Kelly Clowers


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAFoWM=9OMitd_KGgbyLaHvi-eYHOTYMzZCPVnSHq_5M0QQg=9...@mail.gmail.com



Re: New computer planned -- (cleaning old keyboard)

2012-02-22 Thread Patrick Bartek




 On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 02:19:36PM +, Sian Mountbatten wrote:

  Maybe I should keep the keyboard I am using.
  It's not overly clean, but I can live with it.
 
   How to clean a dirty (fatty) keyboard:
   --
 
 Mix liquid ammonia concentrate (NH4-OH) + cold (!) water in a bucket;
 hold your keyboard with them keys down (!) above the bucket;
 
 use a softly scrubbing brush (horse hair = less sqirting) wetted w/ mixture
 and brush the keys from underneath, moving brush softly along their gaps;
 
 keep the keyboard upside down, so the cleaning agent will not enter any
 keyboard contact, and put the keyboard on a warm place in order to get all
 water w/ ammonia completely evaporated.
 
 (Ammonia itself won't leave any residue.)


I just use 90% pure (or better) isopropyl alcohol undiluted, and a soft, 
lint-free cloth.  Just spray on.  Cleans all the crud off, and evaporates 
quickly.  Most pharmacies carry it.  Don't mistakenly buy rubbing alcohol.  It 
has oil in it.  It's made for massage.  You don't want that.

B


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1329932155.68990.yahoomail...@web160304.mail.bf1.yahoo.com



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-22 Thread Dan Ritter
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:58:03PM +, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
 The computer consultant has actually printed out on a piece of
 A5-sized paper just what he's offering. I'm going to ignore the
 Intel Core i3-2100 with 4GB DDR3 1333MHz RAM and get the higher
 spec. machine.
 It will have Intel Core i5-2400 3.10GHz Socket LGA1155, MSI Z68S REV
 B3 motherboard, 8GB DDR3 1600MHz RAM, Nvidia GeForce 8800GT 256MB
 PCI-Express graphics, an SSD OCZ Agility 3 120GB 2.5 SATA instead
 of a hard disk drive, a Samsung DVD-RW SATA, Onboard 7.1 channel HD
 Audio, Onboard 10/100/1000 Mbps Lan, 802.11B/G/N WiFi, an ATX +
 Cooler Master 450W PSU and NO OS. He knows I use Linux. He's going
 to charge me £599 and I think it's worth the money, because if
 anything goes wrong, he's just downstairs.

If you're going with an NVidia card, use a GT220 or 430. They
are reasonably cheap, and are the highest end cards for which
all functions are completely supported.

The 8800GT is a power-sucking beast from a previous generation.

-dsr-

-- 
http://randomstring.org/~dsr/eula.html is hereby incorporated by reference.
You can't fight for freedom by taking away rights.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120222172604.gu17...@randomstring.org



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-21 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Lu, 20 feb 12, 19:38:30, Doug wrote:
 After the plug game, the k/b works fine, and I never used a numberpad
 anyway--all my boards have numbers on the top row--don't all of them?

Yes, but the numpad is very efficient if you have to input a lot of 
numbers.

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: New computer planned

2012-02-21 Thread Randy Kramer
On Monday 20 February 2012 10:17:46 am Allan Wind wrote:
 You did not mention monitors but high definition has brought the
 larger ones way down in price.  30 monitors (2560x1600) are
 still in a different price league but to me it is worth it.  If
 you are buying a 30 consider one with Display Ports instead of
 DVI.  Lenovo's docking station for the W520, for instance, can
 only do the 30 at full resolution via Display Port (this was not
 an issue with earlier versions).  The are DVI to Display Port
 converters but the ones I have are not 100% stable (I probably
 power cycle it a couple of times per month).

Or, consider two smaller monitors and use nVidia's TwinView (their proprietary 
driver)--I haven't tried the open source driver yet.

Randy Kramer


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201202211048.4.rhkra...@gmail.com



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-21 Thread Kelly Clowers
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 07:48, Randy Kramer rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Monday 20 February 2012 10:17:46 am Allan Wind wrote:
 You did not mention monitors but high definition has brought the
 larger ones way down in price.  30 monitors (2560x1600) are
 still in a different price league but to me it is worth it.  If
 you are buying a 30 consider one with Display Ports instead of
 DVI.  Lenovo's docking station for the W520, for instance, can
 only do the 30 at full resolution via Display Port (this was not
 an issue with earlier versions).  The are DVI to Display Port
 converters but the ones I have are not 100% stable (I probably
 power cycle it a couple of times per month).

 Or, consider two smaller monitors and use nVidia's TwinView (their proprietary
 driver)--I haven't tried the open source driver yet.

Nothing special about dual monitors, just use xrandr. Works with
Nvidia, ATI and Intel chips.


Cheers,
Kelly Clowers


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAFoWM=-JSzpOHjhSdXXq6JAH05bjXrr5rmBXLD7EwsAmMac=t...@mail.gmail.com



Re: New computer planned -- (cleaning old keyboard)

2012-02-21 Thread Wilko Fokken
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 02:19:36PM +, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
 Maybe I should keep the keyboard I am using.
 It's not overly clean, but I can live with it.

 --
 Sian Mountbatten
 Algol 68 specialist


Moin mitnanner,


  How to clean a dirty (fatty) keyboard:
  --

Mix liquid ammonia concentrate (NH4-OH) + cold (!) water in a bucket;
hold your keyboard with them keys down (!) above the bucket;

use a softly scrubbing brush (horse hair = less sqirting) wetted w/ mixture
and brush the keys from underneath, moving brush softly along their gaps;

keep the keyboard upside down, so the cleaning agent will not enter any
keyboard contact, and put the keyboard on a warm place in order to get all
water w/ ammonia completely evaporated.

(Ammonia itself won't leave any residue.)


Good luck!


W. Fokken

-- 
.
Education is a man's going
from cocksure ignorance
to thoughtful uncertainty.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120221173136.ga4...@fok01.laje.edewe.de



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-21 Thread Celejar
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 10:15:13 -0500
Curt Howland howl...@priss.com wrote:

...

 It is my understanding that the Intel-based graphics cards work
 perfectly well with the standard Linux drivers, if you want to stay
 purely open-source.

That's what everyone says, but it's not as true as it might be. Squeeze
is shipping X stuff / drivers that cause GPU crashes on my (2007 era)
Thinkpad T61 with Intel GM965 graphics:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44478

Celejar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120221154949.3258b855.cele...@gmail.com



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-21 Thread Tom H
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Celejar cele...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 10:15:13 -0500
 Curt Howland howl...@priss.com wrote:

 It is my understanding that the Intel-based graphics cards work
 perfectly well with the standard Linux drivers, if you want to stay
 purely open-source.

 That's what everyone says, but it's not as true as it might be. Squeeze
 is shipping X stuff / drivers that cause GPU crashes on my (2007 era)
 Thinkpad T61 with Intel GM965 graphics:

 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44478

The last entry on that bug report is that it's fixed.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=sxxuslzjtgsc0uvlb--dhmwnvn5ve1wrocxnkl2gre...@mail.gmail.com



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-21 Thread Sian Mountbatten

Tom H wrote:

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Celejarcele...@gmail.com  wrote:

On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 10:15:13 -0500
Curt Howlandhowl...@priss.com  wrote:


It is my understanding that the Intel-based graphics cards work
perfectly well with the standard Linux drivers, if you want to stay
purely open-source.

Well, the comments on this thread have made interesting reading.

The computer consultant has actually printed out on a piece of A5-sized 
paper just what he's offering. I'm going to ignore the Intel Core 
i3-2100 with 4GB DDR3 1333MHz RAM and get the higher spec. machine.
It will have Intel Core i5-2400 3.10GHz Socket LGA1155, MSI Z68S REV B3 
motherboard, 8GB DDR3 1600MHz RAM, Nvidia GeForce 8800GT 256MB 
PCI-Express graphics, an SSD OCZ Agility 3 120GB 2.5 SATA instead of a 
hard disk drive, a Samsung DVD-RW SATA, Onboard 7.1 channel HD Audio, 
Onboard 10/100/1000 Mbps Lan, 802.11B/G/N WiFi, an ATX + Cooler Master 
450W PSU and NO OS. He knows I use Linux. He's going to charge me £599 
and I think it's worth the money, because if anything goes wrong, he's 
just downstairs.


It's quite possible I could get a lower price on the Internet, but I 
wouldn't have the service and backup. Anyway, I'm not so skint that I 
cannot give some cash for a good computer. My present desktop is over 
7.5 years old and is still going strong. Its power-supply blew up with a 
bang last year, and I bought a big thin TFT screen to replace the one 
that came with the computer.


I'll be keeping my keyboard and the display, and very likely, the mouse. 
So no change there.


What do you think, guys? Do you reckon it will drive Linux like the 
clappers? Nothing like a bit of oomph to liven one's days, eh?


On the software development front, I use the programming language Algol 
68, which is a high-level language. C is a medium-level language. I have 
spent years in porting an old compiler to Linux, providing a decent 
run-time system and even writing a 600-page book to teach the language 
from scratch. I have developed my own Literate Programming System which 
I shall be completing during the coming months. I have written an Algol 
68 binding to the Xforms library so that it is possible to write GUI 
programs without any bother. And, more recently, I now have a web-site 
with more than 150 pages for the book, as well as a manual for the 
software development system I use. The site is in my signature.


Thanks for all your comments.
--
Sian Mountbatten
www.poenikatu.co.uk


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ji17hm$7h2$1...@speranza.aioe.org



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-21 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Ma, 21 feb 12, 22:58:03, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
 It will have Intel Core i5-2400 3.10GHz Socket LGA1155, MSI Z68S REV
 B3 motherboard, 8GB DDR3 1600MHz RAM, Nvidia GeForce 8800GT 256MB
 PCI-Express graphics, an SSD OCZ Agility 3 120GB 2.5 SATA instead
 of a hard disk drive, a Samsung DVD-RW SATA, Onboard 7.1 channel HD
 Audio, Onboard 10/100/1000 Mbps Lan, 802.11B/G/N WiFi, an ATX +
 Cooler Master 450W PSU and NO OS. He knows I use Linux. He's going
 to charge me £599 and I think it's worth the money, because if
 anything goes wrong, he's just downstairs.

Just two comments:

- only 256 MB seems low by todays standards
- do you need WiFi?

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: New computer planned

2012-02-21 Thread Nick Lidakis
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:48:32AM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
 On Lu, 20 feb 12, 16:29:18, Doug wrote:
  
  You need a real mechanical hard drive.  The solid-state drives have
  a  limited read/write cycle. 
 
 Recent studies seem to suggest that the limited read/write cycles are 
 unlikely to affect normal usage.

Andrei,

What do you think about this article on SSD and errors?
Link:http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9224322/SSDs_have_a_bleak_future_researchers_say


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120222031535.GA21090@phobos



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-21 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 2/21/2012 9:15 PM, Nick Lidakis wrote:

 What do you think about this article on SSD and errors?
 Link:http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9224322/SSDs_have_a_bleak_future_researchers_say

I'll tell you in 2024 at 6.5nm when we reach the end.

In the mean time, anyone using a consumer MLC SSD needs to be far more
concerned about device failure due to mundane things like basic product
quality, rather than cells wearing out over time.  For instance...

My first foray into SSD was a Corsair V32.  After less than 4 months,
out of the blue one day, the machine locked up and upon reboot the BIOS
didn't see the SSD.  This was installed in a typical workstation--very
low write load.  The RMA replacement unit thus far has been flawless.
/me knocks on wood

My sister's 5 year old HP has a failing 250GB SATA SRD (spinning rust
disk).  I gave her some options and brief education, and she ordered an
Intel MLC SSD from Newegg.  Slightly more money than competitors but
Intel is fanatical about QC, and we shouldn't have to worry about the
thing dying for many years.  After being burned by the Corsair I
recommended she go top shelf.

-- 
Stan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f44685b.5070...@hardwarefreak.com



New computer planned

2012-02-20 Thread Sian Mountbatten
My desktop computer is nearly 7 years old and I'm thinking that a new 
computer using some of the hardware improvements would be a good thing.


So I'm going to ask my friendly computer consultant, who is only 
downstairs from me, to build me a computer with hardware 3d 
acceleration, solid-state drive, 8Gb RAM. What else should I ask for and 
what works with Linux? He's going to give me a list of the hardware he 
is going to install, so I can check Linux compatibility. Although I am 
not a gamer, I would like to run tuxracer which really needs 3d 
acceleration to work. Any suggestions will be welcome.


Keyboard: for many years now, I have used a keyboard which is not 
membrane-based. It has individual key switches, is properly dished and 
is a joy to use. No keyboard click, but I don't use that anyway. The 
keyboard is connected to the PS/2 socket. Would a wireless keyboard do 
as good a job? I suppose it would probably be USB, but I shall listen to 
advice on that. The keyboard is an essential peripheral and I am willing 
to spend money on a good keyboard. Maybe I should keep the keyboard I am 
using. It's not overly clean, but I can live with it.


I'm not in my twenties anymore and I have no agression to work off with 
snazzy games (which probably only work on Windoze anyway). Software 
development and software development support are my forte. Some of the 
simple games available on Linux provide sufficient entertainment for me, 
but I think that a new computer is one new year gift I could do with.


I shall be interested to hear what people suggest.

Regards
--
Sian Mountbatten
Algol 68 specialist


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jhtkpk$irl$1...@speranza.aioe.org



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-20 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Lu, 20 feb 12, 14:19:36, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
 My desktop computer is nearly 7 years old and I'm thinking that a
 new computer using some of the hardware improvements would be a good
 thing.
 
 So I'm going to ask my friendly computer consultant, who is only
 downstairs from me, to build me a computer with hardware 3d
 acceleration, solid-state drive, 8Gb RAM. What else should I ask for
 and what works with Linux? He's going to give me a list of the
 hardware he is going to install, so I can check Linux compatibility.
 Although I am not a gamer, I would like to run tuxracer which really
 needs 3d acceleration to work. Any suggestions will be welcome.

First decision: proprietary drivers or not

For proprietary I'd chose nVidia cards over ATI anytime. While I can't 
comment on the driver itself, the packaging for nvidia over fglrx in 
Debian is superior (several generations supported, pre-built modules for 
stable, backports, responsive maintainers, etc.).

If you definitely don't want to use proprietary drivers you can also 
consider Intel cards (or even built-in), since I expect the performance 
of either nVidia or ATI cards with the free drivers to be comparable 
with Intel.

OTOH I doubt tuxracer has very high 3d performance requirements.
 
 Keyboard: for many years now, I have used a keyboard which is not
 membrane-based. It has individual key switches, is properly dished
 and is a joy to use. No keyboard click, but I don't use that anyway.
 The keyboard is connected to the PS/2 socket. Would a wireless
 keyboard do as good a job? I suppose it would probably be USB, but I
 shall listen to advice on that. The keyboard is an essential
 peripheral and I am willing to spend money on a good keyboard. Maybe
 I should keep the keyboard I am using. It's not overly clean, but I
 can live with it.

Make sure the new mainboard even has a PS/2 interface, otherwise you'll 
have to use USB adapters (which can cause problems sometimes).

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: New computer planned

2012-02-20 Thread Curt Howland
Sian Mountbatten poenik...@fastmail.co.uk wrote:
 So I'm going to ask my friendly computer consultant, who is only
 downstairs from me, to build me a computer with hardware 3d
 acceleration, solid-state drive, 8Gb RAM. What else should I ask for and
 what works with Linux?

Sian,

Two years ago I did the same thing. Quad-core 3GHz AMD Phenom2, 4G of
1600DDR3 RAM, etc.

Everything on my ASRock and Asus motherboards has worked perfectly
with Linux. In that regard, I don't think you have anything to worry
about.

The only thing I did for Linux compatibility was to not get on-board
graphics. I bought an Nvidia-based graphics card that was not
bleeding edge, even though it's got 3D acceleration. The card has
it's own RAM, so system RAM is not shared, which is a very good thing,
and it drives 3D games perfectly well using the Nvidia supplied
graphics driver.

It is my understanding that the Intel-based graphics cards work
perfectly well with the standard Linux drivers, if you want to stay
purely open-source.

I also kept my old keyboard, since the motherboards all still have PS2
sockets for keyboards. I have tried wireless keyboards, and they have
not been 100% reliable for me.

Curt-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cagy8_s1s7dhwbxxgvyrpchm7-o+e4_hd9g+nqoo8oo6wr8z...@mail.gmail.com



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-20 Thread Lisi
On Monday 20 February 2012 14:19:36 Sian Mountbatten wrote:
 It's not overly clean, but I can live with it.

Perhaps clean it???  I use methylated spirit here in the UK.  You just want 
alcohol, a lint-free cloth and cotton buds.  Then you would not have to live 
with it.

I would certainly recommend keeping your keyboard if you have one you like.

Lisi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201202201535.57654.lisi.re...@gmail.com



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-20 Thread Allan Wind
Hi Sian,

Memory is cheap.  More is better as Linux uses it for disk cache 
if nothing else.

There is a large difference in performance of SSDs and the score 
board changes fairly quickly.  Make sure you have non-crippled 
SATA 3 controller to get most out of them.

Consider some of the high-end laptops.  I have been happy with 
Lenovo's T and W series.  The W520 comes with NVIDIA Quadro M1000 
or M2000 cards which have 3d acceleration.  Docking stations 
are convenient.

I treasure my Kineses Freestyle keyboards as they eliminated the 
pain that I was starting to get.

You did not mention monitors but high definition has brought the 
larger ones way down in price.  30 monitors (2560x1600) are 
still in a different price league but to me it is worth it.  If 
you are buying a 30 consider one with Display Ports instead of 
DVI.  Lenovo's docking station for the W520, for instance, can 
only do the 30 at full resolution via Display Port (this was not 
an issue with earlier versions).  The are DVI to Display Port 
converters but the ones I have are not 100% stable (I probably 
power cycle it a couple of times per month).


/Allan
-- 
Allan Wind
Life Integrity, LLC
http://lifeintegrity.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120220151746.ga27...@lifeintegrity.com



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-20 Thread Rob Owens
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 02:19:36PM +, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
 My desktop computer is nearly 7 years old and I'm thinking that a
 new computer using some of the hardware improvements would be a good
 thing.
 
If you plan to use wireless networking, make sure you check reviews on
newegg, amazon, etc. for the particular wireless card you plan to buy --
make sure it is Linux-compatible.

-Rob


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120220155833.gd24...@aurora.owens.net



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-20 Thread Kelly Clowers
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 06:19, Sian Mountbatten
poenik...@fastmail.co.uk wrote:
 My desktop computer is nearly 7 years old and I'm thinking that a new
 computer using some of the hardware improvements would be a good thing.

 So I'm going to ask my friendly computer consultant, who is only downstairs
 from me, to build me a computer with hardware 3d acceleration, solid-state
 drive, 8Gb RAM.

Good. Note that it actually on the difficult side to build a desktop computer
without 3D. You would have to not use integrated graphics and find an ancient
PCI (or maybe AGP?) video card that did not have 3D. I imagine that your
current computer has 3D, though just possibly if it was crummy when you
got it, it may have only pre-GeForce non-programmable 3D.

For the SSD, check what he plans to put in there. Intel or something
with a SandForce (OCZ, et. al.) controller will bring the best performance,
though the cheaper ones will still outperform spinning disks.

Depending on how much data you have, and how much you want to
spend, a large HDD might be in order as well, since a large SSD is
only 128-256 GB, and is still expensive.

8 gigs has been serving me very well.

What else should I ask for and what works with Linux? He's
 going to give me a list of the hardware he is going to install, so I can
 check Linux compatibility. Although I am not a gamer, I would like to run
 tuxracer which really needs 3d acceleration to work. Any suggestions will be
 welcome.

Any 3D chip will handle it. I am not sure where the cutoff would be, but
for sure anything from the last 5 years

If TuxRacer/PlanetPenguin and similar (and maybe composited desktop)
is really all you need from 3D, I highly recommend going with Intel integrated
graphics. Simple excellent Open Source drivers, and plenty of power for what
you are looking at. Especially if you are building a true modern system, the
Sandy Bridge graphics are quite nice (though, as always, there is something
just around the corner: Ivy bridge is coming up)

 Keyboard: for many years now, I have used a keyboard which is not
 membrane-based. It has individual key switches, is properly dished and is a
 joy to use. No keyboard click, but I don't use that anyway. The keyboard is
 connected to the PS/2 socket. Would a wireless keyboard do as good a job? I
 suppose it would probably be USB, but I shall listen to advice on that. The
 keyboard is an essential peripheral and I am willing to spend money on a
 good keyboard. Maybe I should keep the keyboard I am using. It's not overly
 clean, but I can live with it.

They are still making motherboards with PS/2 ports (well, usually just one).
USB would be as good. Wireless - aside from needing batteries replaced,
there can indeed be input lag or interference. Usually nothing major, but it
can be noticeable at times. I am not a fan, unless you are using it from a
couch to control a home theater PC or something.

 I'm not in my twenties anymore and I have no agression to work off with
 snazzy games (which probably only work on Windoze anyway).

I am leaving my 20s, but those games can be fun once in a while.
A pretty fair number of games run fine on Wine, and there are
actually a large number of FPSs that are native on Linux.

Software
 development and software development support are my forte. Some of the
 simple games available on Linux provide sufficient entertainment for me, but
 I think that a new computer is one new year gift I could do with.

It should make some things nicer I think.


Cheers,
Kelly Clowers


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAFoWM=9f8cbw7aeiadx9nsjtbf6b2qjnovj7ui54dd2dfsm...@mail.gmail.com



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-20 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 16:58 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
 On Lu, 20 feb 12, 14:19:36, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
  My desktop computer is nearly 7 years old and I'm thinking that a
  new computer using some of the hardware improvements would be a good
  thing.
  
  So I'm going to ask my friendly computer consultant, who is only
  downstairs from me, to build me a computer with hardware 3d
  acceleration, solid-state drive, 8Gb RAM. What else should I ask for
  and what works with Linux? He's going to give me a list of the
  hardware he is going to install, so I can check Linux compatibility.
  Although I am not a gamer, I would like to run tuxracer which really
  needs 3d acceleration to work. Any suggestions will be welcome.

You can't check for perfect Linux compatibility just by a list of the
hardware. Regarding to your needs a combination of hardware always can
cause issues.

I experienced that 4GB are even enough for heavy audio productions. I
suspect that there are less fields off applications, where you need more
than 4GB.

 First decision: proprietary drivers or not
 
 For proprietary I'd chose nVidia cards over ATI anytime. While I can't 
 comment on the driver itself, the packaging for nvidia over fglrx in 
 Debian is superior (several generations supported, pre-built modules for 
 stable, backports, responsive maintainers, etc.).

I've got bad experiences with NVIDI, so I bought a mobo with an onboard
ATI. The ATI caused an unsolvable issue, so I bought a NVIDI for the
mobo with the internal ATI. IOW I agree, I experienced ATI as more worse
than NVIDIA. I heard that the best solution should be to get a mobo with
an Intel graphics. Especially today most distros dropped the nv driver,
but the proprietary can't be used all the times. The nouveau driver for
most distros, including Debian ex testing, is the only alternative to
the proprietary one.

 If you definitely don't want to use proprietary drivers you can also 
 consider Intel cards (or even built-in), since I expect the performance 
 of either nVidia or ATI cards with the free drivers to be comparable 
 with Intel.
 
 OTOH I doubt tuxracer has very high 3d performance requirements.

:D

IMO it's more important to get a passive graphics, they are all fast
enough to race with Tux through GoogleEarth. Perhaps you need something
special like HDMI or video composite.

Get a PSU with a large fan.

Get a CPU that has less power consumption.

I'm using an Athlon BE-2350 2.1GHz dual-core, 45W. it's fast enough even
for heavy audio productions, anyway, sometimes I wish to have something
faster, when compiling a kernel or converting a video.

I always use two HDDs, to make backups from one to the other, but just
two, to get less noise and power consumption.
The casing is the week point of my machine.

  Keyboard: for many years now, I have used a keyboard which is not
  membrane-based. It has individual key switches, is properly dished
  and is a joy to use. No keyboard click, but I don't use that anyway.
  The keyboard is connected to the PS/2 socket. Would a wireless
  keyboard do as good a job? I suppose it would probably be USB, but I
  shall listen to advice on that. The keyboard is an essential
  peripheral and I am willing to spend money on a good keyboard. Maybe
  I should keep the keyboard I am using. It's not overly clean, but I
  can live with it.
 
 Make sure the new mainboard even has a PS/2 interface, otherwise you'll 
 have to use USB adapters (which can cause problems sometimes).

It's always a PITA to use a new mouse or keyboard. Keep the once you've
got as long as possible.

Take care of PCI, and the different PCIe slots if you need them. You can
drop ATA, all you need is SATA, IOW buy new HDDs if needed.

If you want good audio quality buy RME cards only. If you need MIDI,
avoid USB.

- Ralf



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1329753536.2045.340.camel@oz.(null)



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-20 Thread Kelly Clowers
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 07:15, Curt Howland howl...@priss.com wrote:


 The only thing I did for Linux compatibility was to not get on-board
 graphics.

Onboard graphics (Intel) is the best way to get Linux compatibility,
actually. Although they have not provide specs like AMD, the level
of support they put into the GPL drivers (there are no closed drivers!)
is greater than AMD. And they have been driving much other Linux
graphics work as well. Keith Packard himself even works there.


Cheers,
Kelly Clowers


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAFoWM=9dpkyqdidaju0mg3ckxn1q37ksk-lp2cpohqcq9e8...@mail.gmail.com



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-20 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 16:58 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
 Especially today most distros dropped the nv driver,
 but the proprietary can't be used all the times. The nouveau driver for
 most distros, including Debian ex testing, is the only alternative to
 the proprietary one.

This driver is marked as experimental and doesn't work for many
people.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1329753769.2045.342.camel@oz.(null)



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-20 Thread Kelly Clowers
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 07:58, Rob Owens row...@ptd.net wrote:
 On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 02:19:36PM +, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
 My desktop computer is nearly 7 years old and I'm thinking that a
 new computer using some of the hardware improvements would be a good
 thing.

 If you plan to use wireless networking, make sure you check reviews on
 newegg, amazon, etc. for the particular wireless card you plan to buy --
 make sure it is Linux-compatible.

Well, verifying the chipset should be fine. Although I hate WiFi and avoid it
regardless of OS, if I can...

Cheers,
Kelly Clowers


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAFoWM=-ehpqdehxydd_rsdjokmthuyk5nwbfbjtz8pdq3y8...@mail.gmail.com



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-20 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 16:58 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
 On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 16:58 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
  If you definitely don't want to use proprietary drivers you can also 
  consider Intel cards (or even built-in)

Do they have 3D support?

 You can
 drop ATA, all you need is SATA, IOW buy new HDDs if needed.

The SATA connectors are bad, get some with clips. I've got SATA without
clips and from time to time I need to reconnect the connectors. A friend
experiences the same.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1329754185.2045.346.camel@oz.(null)



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-20 Thread Rob Owens
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 04:58:56PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
 I always use two HDDs, to make backups from one to the other, but just
 two, to get less noise and power consumption.
 The casing is the week point of my machine.
 
Good point about the case.  I've seen so many cases that only have spots
for 1 or 2 hard drives.  I'd get a case that can hold 6 or so 3.5 hard
drives, just in case you decide to repurpose this machine later in life.
It's also nice to be able to install your 2 hard drives with some space
in between them (for better cooling).

-Rob


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120220163020.gb25...@aurora.owens.net



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-20 Thread green
Andrei POPESCU wrote at 2012-02-20 08:58 -0600:
 OTOH I doubt tuxracer has very high 3d performance requirements.

Extreme TuxRacer works fine on my Intel GM965, fullscreen.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: New computer planned

2012-02-20 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 10:15 -0500, Curt Howland wrote:
 The card has
 it's own RAM, so system RAM is not shared, which is a very good thing

It's a myth that shared RAM for the framebuffer is less good than a
graphics with it's own RAM. What exactly should be better if the
graphics has got it's own RAM?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1329755488.28024.4.camel@oz.(null)



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-20 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 10:17 -0500, Allan Wind wrote:
 Memory is cheap.  More is better as Linux uses it for disk cache 
 if nothing else.

For heavy audio production I never noticed that even the swap gets
touched with 4GB RAM.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1329755761.28024.6.camel@oz.(null)



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-20 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Lu, 20 feb 12, 17:09:45, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
 On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 16:58 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
  On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 16:58 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
   If you definitely don't want to use proprietary drivers you can also 
   consider Intel cards (or even built-in)
 
 Do they have 3D support?

Yes, but not as good as nVidia/ATI.

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: New computer planned

2012-02-20 Thread Kelly Clowers
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 08:31, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
 On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 10:15 -0500, Curt Howland wrote:
 The card has
 it's own RAM, so system RAM is not shared, which is a very good thing

 It's a myth that shared RAM for the framebuffer is less good than a
 graphics with it's own RAM. What exactly should be better if the
 graphics has got it's own RAM?

There is more RAM available. If you have 4GB, and shared memory,
and a game needs 512MB just for textures, then you have that much
less for the system. Also, current GDDR speeds are much higher
than current DDR speeds. Memory bandwidth is king for intensive
modern games.

Now, for low performance stuff, it isn't going to matter much.
Intel IGPs' pure processing power is low enough that the
boost they would get from dedicated memory would be fairly
small. Not to mention the GDDR would add cost and heat. So
Intel doesn't make them like that. Or as discrete cards at all.

For heavy audio production I never noticed that even the swap gets
touched with 4GB RAM.

Depend on what else you might be running, including what
desktop environment or window manager. Not to mention than
if he may keep this for another 7 years, he may as well get 8GB
(or more). In 4 or 5 years, RAM should as usual, be much
cheaper for the same amount and be faster too. But it doesn't
mean the RAM he can use in the old motherboard will be cheaper
Have you seen the price of DDR 1 or even 2 compared to 3 lately?

I run a light WM instead of KDE or Gnome, but I still noticed
a difference going from 4 to 8, as I run an inordinate number
of tabs in my browser. It really depends on the details of your
usage. He doesn't say what kind of Software Dev he does,
maybe he will want to run a dev database or two to test
against or something.

This driver is marked as experimental and doesn't work
for many people.

Well, it is hard to reverse-engineer that kind of thing.
If you get one of the models they been focusing on
for a while, it ought to work fairly well.

But in general, get a well-supported ATI card for
performance, or Intel otherwise. I guess the highest
performance on Linux come from the closed nvidia
driver, but I don't understand people that use Linux
but then support a company like nvidia. Even if you
use Catalyst (which I don't much like either), at least
it supports a reasonable company.


Cheers,
Kelly Clowers


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAFoWM=8cjradunengt78nyhqypgptffcu8bfdhfyeuwrjqb...@mail.gmail.com



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-20 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Lu, 20 feb 12, 10:15:13, Curt Howland wrote:
 
 I also kept my old keyboard, since the motherboards all still have PS2
 sockets for keyboards. 

I have been looking only at mini-ITX motherboards lately and I seem to 
recall models without PS/2, but you are probably right about full-sized 
ATX boards.

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: New computer planned

2012-02-20 Thread Doug

On 2/20/2012 9:19 AM, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
My desktop computer is nearly 7 years old and I'm thinking that a new 
computer using some of the hardware improvements would be a good thing.


So I'm going to ask my friendly computer consultant, who is only 
downstairs from me, to build me a computer with hardware 3d 
acceleration, solid-state drive, 8Gb RAM. What else should I ask for 
and what works with Linux? He's going to give me a list of the 
hardware he is going to install, so I can check Linux compatibility. 
Although I am not a gamer, I would like to run tuxracer which really 
needs 3d acceleration to work. Any suggestions will be welcome.


Keyboard: for many years now, I have used a keyboard which is not 
membrane-based. It has individual key switches, is properly dished and 
is a joy to use. No keyboard click, but I don't use that anyway. The 
keyboard is connected to the PS/2 socket. Would a wireless keyboard do 
as good a job? I suppose it would probably be USB, but I shall listen 
to advice on that. The keyboard is an essential peripheral and I am 
willing to spend money on a good keyboard. Maybe I should keep the 
keyboard I am using. It's not overly clean, but I can live with it.


I'm not in my twenties anymore and I have no agression to work off 
with snazzy games (which probably only work on Windoze anyway). 
Software development and software development support are my forte. 
Some of the simple games available on Linux provide sufficient 
entertainment for me, but I think that a new computer is one new year 
gift I could do with.


I shall be interested to hear what people suggest.

Regards
--
Sian Mountbatten
Algol 68 specialist



A couple of suggestions:

If you like your old keyboard, clean it up and use it.  If you really 
want a nice keyboard, you want an IBM model M
or its clone.  Not cheap, unless you find one surplus someplace,  Go to 
ClickyKeyboards.com (http://www.clickykeyboards.com/). They sell
refurbed model Ms and a clone.  The model M has no Microsoft keys.  I'm 
using three (on three computers) all of which are probably at
least 20 years old, bought at computer flea-markets, back when there 
were such things.  They'll probably be working fine long after I'm dead,

if some nincompoop doesn't throw them out for not having MS keys.

You mention wireless keyboard: you'd have to have a receiver on the 
computer itself.  If that's not built in, then yes, it would probably
be USB.  Modern machines have lots of USB ports, and they work very 
well. Of course, the k/b would have a battery in it, that would 
eventually die,

so you'd want to have a spare available.

You need a real mechanical hard drive.  The solid-state drives have a  
limited read/write cycle.  It's kind of a fad right now, since real
drives are in short supply and expensive, due to foods in Thailand, 
where some critical part comes from.  Some day the solid-state
drive will be perfected, but it's not yet.  If you want real security of 
data, get two hard drives and make a raid array. For real quick
response, however, the solid-state drive can't be beat, so you might 
want one just for your development work--then transfer the

final product to the revolving kind.

Just my 2¢--doug


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f42bb2e.6050...@optonline.net



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-20 Thread David Christensen

On 02/20/2012 06:58 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:

If you definitely don't want to use proprietary drivers you can also
consider Intel cards (or even built-in),


I prefer full FOSS HW support OOTB and have had the best experiences 
with Intel processors and integrated motherboards (video, sound, 
PATA/SATA, LAN, serial, parallel, PS/2, USB, etc.).



Does Squeeze have full FOSS HW support OOTB for the Intel 
Second-Generation Core processors and Q67 chipset motherboards?  Does 
Wheezy?  Sid?  As other posters have mentioned, checking HCL's is 
difficult at best.



I'm considering building a Debian Gnome 64-bit desktop and a Debian Xen 
or XCP 64-bit server using i5-2500S processors and DQ67SW motherboards:



http://ark.intel.com/products/52211/Intel-Core-i5-2500S-Processor-%286M-Cache-2_70-GHz%29

http://ark.intel.com/products/51997/Intel-Desktop-Board-DQ67SW

Any comments from people running Debian, Gnome, Xen, or XCP on these parts?


TIA,

David


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f42c0c0.7030...@holgerdanske.com



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-20 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Lu, 20 feb 12, 16:29:18, Doug wrote:
 
 You need a real mechanical hard drive.  The solid-state drives have
 a  limited read/write cycle. 

Recent studies seem to suggest that the limited read/write cycles are 
unlikely to affect normal usage.

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: New computer planned

2012-02-20 Thread Rob Owens
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 09:54:54PM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
 On Lu, 20 feb 12, 10:15:13, Curt Howland wrote:
  
  I also kept my old keyboard, since the motherboards all still have PS2
  sockets for keyboards. 
 
 I have been looking only at mini-ITX motherboards lately and I seem to 
 recall models without PS/2, but you are probably right about full-sized 
 ATX boards.
 
I had a Dell 5150 desktop at work about 5 years ago, and it didn't have
any PS/2 ports.  So they are out there!

-Rob


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120221001419.gd30...@aurora.owens.net



Re: New computer planned

2012-02-20 Thread Doug

On 2/20/2012 7:14 PM, Rob Owens wrote:

On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 09:54:54PM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:

On Lu, 20 feb 12, 10:15:13, Curt Howland wrote:

I also kept my old keyboard, since the motherboards all still have PS2
sockets for keyboards.

I have been looking only at mini-ITX motherboards lately and I seem to
recall models without PS/2, but you are probably right about full-sized
ATX boards.


I had a Dell 5150 desktop at work about 5 years ago, and it didn't have
any PS/2 ports.  So they are out there!

-Rob


Several folks have already said that running a keyboard thru an adapter 
to a USB port
can be a problem.  I second that.  I have a Dell Inspiron 5400/E1505 
that I have been
running with an IBM model M shortened external keyboard (no numberpad) 
thru a
PS2 to USB adapter.  It runs fine once it starts, but on turn-on from 
cold, the USB plug
must be momentarily removed and replaced in order for the computer to 
fully access
the k/b.  It will see some letters but not others.  Since the k/b can be 
switched (some-
how) to have a phantom numberpad on the right-hand letter keys, I think 
it comes up
that way, altho the keys don't produce numbers--they produce nothing. 
After the
plug game, the k/b works fine, and I never used a numberpad anyway--all 
my boards

have numbers on the top row--don't all of them?

--doug


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f42e786.3020...@optonline.net



new computer maybe wrong dvd burner

2008-04-25 Thread Jude DaShiell
I got a dvd burner in a refurbished more modern machine and may have got 
the wrong brand and model.  Later I'll get some help changing booting 
order in cmos to pick this drive up.  For now I don't know what device to 
try and mount this drive with:

Script started on Fri 25 Apr 2008 04:03:35 AM EDT
ns:~# wodim -scanbus
scsibus1000:
1000,0,0 10) *
1000,1,0 11) *
1000,2,0 12) 'LITE-ON ' 'DVDRW LDW-451S  ' 'GSB4' Removable CD-ROM
1000,3,0 13) *
1000,4,0 14) *
1000,5,0 15) *
1000,6,0 16) *
1000,7,0 17) *
ns:~# exit
exit

Script done on Fri 25 Apr 2008 04:03:57 AM EDT



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: new computer maybe wrong dvd burner

2008-04-25 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 04/25/08 03:11, Jude DaShiell wrote:
 I got a dvd burner in a refurbished more modern machine and may have got
 the wrong brand and model.  Later I'll get some help changing booting
 order in cmos to pick this drive up.  For now I don't know what device
 to try and mount this drive with:
 Script started on Fri 25 Apr 2008 04:03:35 AM EDT
 ns:~# wodim -scanbus
 scsibus1000:
 1000,0,0 10) *
 1000,1,0 11) *
 1000,2,0 12) 'LITE-ON ' 'DVDRW LDW-451S  ' 'GSB4' Removable CD-ROM
 1000,3,0 13) *
 1000,4,0 14) *
 1000,5,0 15) *
 1000,6,0 16) *
 1000,7,0 17) *
 ns:~# exit
 exit

See if /dev/scd? exists.

- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

We want... a Shrubbery!!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIEa7kS9HxQb37XmcRAj4dAKDLxkZfX0qSMSIK6qkFhh5SULRjcQCgrrBt
PhVFzGWRKf6akBH3JJVI0Z4=
=ERNp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: new computer maybe wrong dvd burner

2008-04-25 Thread Mumia W..

On 04/25/2008 03:11 AM, Jude DaShiell wrote:
I got a dvd burner in a refurbished more modern machine and may have got 
the wrong brand and model.  Later I'll get some help changing booting 
order in cmos to pick this drive up.  For now I don't know what device 
to try and mount this drive with:

Script started on Fri 25 Apr 2008 04:03:35 AM EDT
ns:~# wodim -scanbus
scsibus1000:
1000,0,0 10) *
1000,1,0 11) *
1000,2,0 12) 'LITE-ON ' 'DVDRW LDW-451S  ' 'GSB4' Removable CD-ROM
1000,3,0 13) *
1000,4,0 14) *
1000,5,0 15) *
1000,6,0 16) *
1000,7,0 17) *
ns:~# exit
exit

Script done on Fri 25 Apr 2008 04:03:57 AM EDT





When you connect the drive, kernel messages are created. Those messages 
can be listed using the dmesg utility. Probably, the kernel will tell 
where the device is located.





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: New computer

2007-04-24 Thread Richard

On 24/04/07, Joe Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Richard wrote:
 Hi all
 I just put a new computer together and would like to know your input
 about the following problems i experience. My new system has these
 components.:

 Motherboard - Intel DP965LT
 CPU - Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
 HD - Seagate IDE 200 GB
 HD - Seagate SATA 250 GB
 DVD-rw NEC IDE

 Now i tried to install the new Debian Etch on it but already pretty
 fast during the install process i got stuck, because the installer
 could not find the CDROM drive. After i when i would have installed
 Etch i would like to have upgraded to Sid.

 So now i installed Ubuntu Feisty Fawn. And this did find my CDROM
 drive, but it sees my IDE HD as /dev/sda ... also not what it should
 be.

 My questions are: How can i install Debian Etch and upgrade to Sid on
 this hardware? Or are there modern Sid-netinstall-i386 iso images,
 which would not have the cdrom not found errors? Will debian then
 also see the /dev/hda as /dev/sda ?

1) Etch *should* work.


I will try later today, i am now at work. I put the machine together
yesterday and just tried to install Etch and after a while i just went
on with Ubuntu because it seemed the Etch installer could not find the
cdrom. Also found some options i could give to the kernel while it
boots like all-generic-ide and irqpoll and also will look at the
options Sudev Barar gave.


2) All drives as of the 2.6.20 kernel are /dev/sdX, and you've noticed
by now I am sure that fstab is using UUID.


Aha, this i did not know. Thanks for the info!


3) If you want to install Sid, you can try Sidux.  It is Sid.


Mmm, never heard of it, but will google for it.


4) Another way would be to get the business card ISO and choose Sid as
your distribution.


Yes i found in some forum a link to the daily netinstall mini iso images
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/netboot/mini.iso
Also will try this when other options won't work.


If you want to run the latest version of things, then you have to be
willing to accept the changes.  Linux evolves.


Just can not know everything about all the changes which occur in the
development of these new versions.

Anyway, thanks!
Richard


Joe

- --
Registerd Linux user #443289 at http://counter.li.org/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGLZk3iXBCVWpc5J4RAh1GAKCfAKgM+B/JAlFM3wvBvaX2gHS9GgCgr2hY
sZswPFWWbKE4voE3BGCtqtc=
=/Ei5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




New computer

2007-04-23 Thread Richard

Hi all
I just put a new computer together and would like to know your input
about the following problems i experience. My new system has these
components.:

Motherboard - Intel DP965LT
CPU - Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
HD - Seagate IDE 200 GB
HD - Seagate SATA 250 GB
DVD-rw NEC IDE

Now i tried to install the new Debian Etch on it but already pretty
fast during the install process i got stuck, because the installer
could not find the CDROM drive. After i when i would have installed
Etch i would like to have upgraded to Sid.

So now i installed Ubuntu Feisty Fawn. And this did find my CDROM
drive, but it sees my IDE HD as /dev/sda ... also not what it should
be.

My questions are: How can i install Debian Etch and upgrade to Sid on
this hardware? Or are there modern Sid-netinstall-i386 iso images,
which would not have the cdrom not found errors? Will debian then
also see the /dev/hda as /dev/sda ?

Thanks


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: New computer

2007-04-23 Thread Joe Hart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Richard wrote:
 Hi all
 I just put a new computer together and would like to know your input
 about the following problems i experience. My new system has these
 components.:
 
 Motherboard - Intel DP965LT
 CPU - Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
 HD - Seagate IDE 200 GB
 HD - Seagate SATA 250 GB
 DVD-rw NEC IDE
 
 Now i tried to install the new Debian Etch on it but already pretty
 fast during the install process i got stuck, because the installer
 could not find the CDROM drive. After i when i would have installed
 Etch i would like to have upgraded to Sid.
 
 So now i installed Ubuntu Feisty Fawn. And this did find my CDROM
 drive, but it sees my IDE HD as /dev/sda ... also not what it should
 be.
 
 My questions are: How can i install Debian Etch and upgrade to Sid on
 this hardware? Or are there modern Sid-netinstall-i386 iso images,
 which would not have the cdrom not found errors? Will debian then
 also see the /dev/hda as /dev/sda ?

1) Etch *should* work.

2) All drives as of the 2.6.20 kernel are /dev/sdX, and you've noticed
by now I am sure that fstab is using UUID.

3) If you want to install Sid, you can try Sidux.  It is Sid.

4) Another way would be to get the business card ISO and choose Sid as
your distribution.

If you want to run the latest version of things, then you have to be
willing to accept the changes.  Linux evolves.

Joe

- --
Registerd Linux user #443289 at http://counter.li.org/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGLZk3iXBCVWpc5J4RAh1GAKCfAKgM+B/JAlFM3wvBvaX2gHS9GgCgr2hY
sZswPFWWbKE4voE3BGCtqtc=
=/Ei5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



looking for a new computer burn in util

2007-04-17 Thread Tony Heal
I am looking for a an all in one solution to performing a burn in of new 
servers. I know there are many stand-alone
programs useful for that sort of thing, like Memtest86, CPUburn, Bonnie++, and 
just plain old repeatedly compiling the
Linux kernel. But, is there a boot-able Live CD. Something I can use to test 
the hardware, before I install the OS and
other software. 

 

Thanks in advance

 

Tony

 



Re: looking for a new computer burn in util

2007-04-17 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 07:51:48PM -0400, Tony Heal wrote:
 I am looking for a an all in one solution to performing a burn in of new 
 servers. I know there are many stand-alone
 programs useful for that sort of thing, like Memtest86, CPUburn, Bonnie++, 
 and just plain old repeatedly compiling the
 Linux kernel. But, is there a boot-able Live CD. Something I can use to test 
 the hardware, before I install the OS and
 other software. 
 
Depending on the hardware architecture, Knoppix will work.  IIRC, it has
memtest86+, cpuburn and bonnie++ along with a toolchain.

Regards,

-Roberto

-- 
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: looking for a new computer burn in util

2007-04-17 Thread Greg Folkert
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 19:51 -0400, Tony Heal wrote:
 I am looking for a an all in one solution to performing a burn in of
 new servers. I know there are many stand-alone programs useful for
 that sort of thing, like Memtest86, CPUburn, Bonnie++, and just plain
 old repeatedly compiling the Linux kernel. But, is there a boot-able
 Live CD. Something I can use to test the hardware, before I install
 the OS and other software. 

http://ltp.sourceforge.net/

If it were me, I'd do a completely minimal (meaning nothing more than
needed to boot the system and get network access) install of Debian
Lenny, upgrade to Sid. Then install the following, along with all recs
and suggests:

ltp - The Linux Test Project test suite
ltp-commands-test - Command tests for the Linux Test Project
ltp-disc-test - Disk I/O tests for the Linux Test Project
ltp-kernel-test - kernel tests for the Linux Test Project
ltp-misc-test - Misc. tests for the Linux Test Project
ltp-network-test - Network tests for the Linux Test Project
ltp-tools - Utilities for running the Linux Test Project test suite

The do the runalltests.sh. Let it burn for a while. If it survives, it
should be good for a while.

When done, wipe and install said OS of your choice. This is what I do
personally. Do a minimal system install, install ltp and bang away at
it.
-- 
greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Novell's Directory Services is a competitive product to Microsoft's
Active Directory in much the same way that the Saturn V is a competitive
product to those dinky little model rockets that kids light off down at
the playfield. -- Thane Walkup


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Get a head start on a new computer career

2005-05-20 Thread Rosabel
Popular software at low low prices. 
http://ejxfz.4b8jpl4x1wmbjn4.avowknavow7.com


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Buying a new computer, questions!

2004-02-09 Thread M . Kirchhoff
Nano Nano 40119.nospam at comcast.net writes:

 This low-latency ram is supposed to be nice.  All my games play 
 extremely well but Doom 3 is about out.  

Under Windows? I'm still tethered to XP for certain games that do not work under
WINE. Always interested in tips from those who've mastered the frustrating art
of gaming under Linux. I'm glad to see a trend toward multi-platform releases,
though. For example, the next version of Unreal will be released for Windows,
Linux, and Mac...

--M. Kirchhoff


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Buying a new computer, questions!

2004-02-09 Thread Nano Nano
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 06:55:06PM +, M.Kirchhoff wrote:
 Nano Nano 40119.nospam at comcast.net writes:
 
  This low-latency ram is supposed to be nice.  All my games play 
  extremely well but Doom 3 is about out.  
 
 Under Windows? I'm still tethered to XP for certain games that do not work under
 WINE. Always interested in tips from those who've mastered the frustrating art
 of gaming under Linux. I'm glad to see a trend toward multi-platform releases,
 though. For example, the next version of Unreal will be released for Windows,
 Linux, and Mac...

Yes, I still use Windows XP for Games, writing my resume, and filing my 
taxes.  However, I use Linux for e-Government, online banking, and 
managing my investment portfolio (such as it is), querying my library 
record with some perl scripts, and things.

Longhorn will ship around 2006.  I changed my XP partition to the new PC 
for games, but I mostly use Debian on it.  My old PC now runs Windows 
2000 from with an old MSDN valid key that I (legally) have.  I use it 
with my Creative Digital VCR and to serve files, I *would* use Linux but 
DVCR doesn't work in Linux.

Longhorn will ship in 2006.  It will be interesting in the state of 
Linux as to whether or not I feel compelled to purchase it at full 
retail price.  Hopefully in 2 years I will have left Microsoft behind 
completely.

I went ahead and bought the new P4 3.2 and it overclocks to a 3.36 (5%).  
My PC4000 does 5 MB/sec on a SiSoft Sandra memory benchmark -- its 
capacity is 5.6 MB/sec, but you have to use a 2.4 or 2.6 overclocked to 
a 3.2 to get that kind of speed.  It's plenty fast.

Linux kernel 2.6.2 compiles in 6 minutes, which is roughly 100% faster 
than the P4 1.7.  abcde/cdparanoia/flac fly.  Mplayer and Fire{bird,fox} 
compile 100% faster.  Openoffice finally starts in reasonably quickly!
Totally worth it!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Buying a new computer, questions!

2004-02-02 Thread Nano Nano
I am going to buy a new computer this week (yay Bush tax cuts!) -- will 
it work with Linux?

Intel Pentium 4/ 3.2C GHz 800MHz FSB, 512K Cache, Hyper Threading 
Technology - Retail

Asus 875P Chipset Motherboard for Intel Socket 478 CPU, Model P4C800-E 
DELUXE -RETAIL

Corsair XMS Extreme Memory Speed Series, Low Latency (Twin Pack) 184 Pin 
512MB(256MBx2) DDR PC-3200 - Retail
(x2 = 1gig)

plus a good case will be $960! woot!
The other stuff will come over from my old PC.

Will Linux be happy with Hyperthreading and this particular Mobo?  I'm 
going to do some googling but I wondered if any could share experiences.

Links:

CPU:
http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc.asp?description=19-116-164catalog=343manufactory=BROWSEdepa=1
Mobo:
http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc.asp?description=13-131-464depa=1
Memory:
http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc.asp?description=20-145-431catalog=147manufactory=BROWSEdepa=1


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Buying a new computer, questions!

2004-02-02 Thread Mike M
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 12:57:27AM -0800, Nano Nano wrote:
 I am going to buy a new computer this week (yay Bush tax cuts!) -- will 
 it work with Linux?
 
 Intel Pentium 4/ 3.2C GHz 800MHz FSB, 512K Cache, Hyper Threading 
 Technology - Retail
 
 Asus 875P Chipset Motherboard for Intel Socket 478 CPU, Model P4C800-E 
 DELUXE -RETAIL
 
 Corsair XMS Extreme Memory Speed Series, Low Latency (Twin Pack) 184 Pin 
 512MB(256MBx2) DDR PC-3200 - Retail
 (x2 = 1gig)
 
 plus a good case will be $960! woot!
 The other stuff will come over from my old PC.
 
 Will Linux be happy with Hyperthreading and this particular Mobo?  I'm 
 going to do some googling but I wondered if any could share experiences.

1. I have a Mobile Pentium 4 with h/t running unstable with 2.4 kernel;
seems A-OK to me

2. Read in O'Reilly Understanding the Linux Kernel 2nd Ed. that:

Very recently, Intel introduced the hyper-threading technology.
Basically, the hyper-threaded CPU isa microprocessor that executes two
threads of exectuions at once; it includes serveral copies of the
internal registers and quickly switches between them. Thanks to this
approach, the machine cycles spent when one thread is accessing the RAM
can be exploited by the second thread. A hyper-threaded CPU is seen by
the kernel as two different CPUs, so Linux does not have to be
explicitly made aware of it. However, Lnux breaks the oldest idle rule
and forces an immediate resceduling when it discovers that a
hyper-threaded CPU is running two idle processes.

-- 
Mike


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Buying a new computer, questions!

2004-02-02 Thread Kenward Vaughan
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 08:37:53AM +0100, Mike M wrote:
 On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 12:57:27AM -0800, Nano Nano wrote:
  I am going to buy a new computer this week (yay Bush tax cuts!) -- will 
  it work with Linux?
  
  Intel Pentium 4/ 3.2C GHz 800MHz FSB, 512K Cache, Hyper Threading 
  Technology - Retail
...
 1. I have a Mobile Pentium 4 with h/t running unstable with 2.4 kernel;
 seems A-OK to me
 
 2. Read in O'Reilly Understanding the Linux Kernel 2nd Ed. that:
 
 Very recently, Intel introduced the hyper-threading technology.
 Basically, the hyper-threaded CPU isa microprocessor that executes two
 threads of exectuions at once; it includes serveral copies of the
 internal registers and quickly switches between them. Thanks to this
 approach, the machine cycles spent when one thread is accessing the RAM
 can be exploited by the second thread. A hyper-threaded CPU is seen by
 the kernel as two different CPUs, so Linux does not have to be
 explicitly made aware of it. However, Lnux breaks the oldest idle rule
 and forces an immediate resceduling when it discovers that a
 hyper-threaded CPU is running two idle processes.


This seems to be fixed in 2.6.x.  See

http://www.linuxforums.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3346

and search on hyper.


Kenward
-- 
In a completely rational society, the best of us would aspire to be 
_teachers_ and the rest of us would have to settle for something less, 
because passing civilization along from one generation to the next 
ought to be the highest honor and the highest responsibility anyone 
could have. - Lee Iacocca


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Buying a new computer, questions!

2004-02-02 Thread rthoreau
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 12:57:27AM -0800, Nano Nano wrote:
 I am going to buy a new computer this week (yay Bush tax cuts!) -- will 
 it work with Linux?
 
 Intel Pentium 4/ 3.2C GHz 800MHz FSB, 512K Cache, Hyper Threading 
 Technology - Retail
 
 Asus 875P Chipset Motherboard for Intel Socket 478 CPU, Model P4C800-E 
 DELUXE -RETAIL
 
 Corsair XMS Extreme Memory Speed Series, Low Latency (Twin Pack) 184 Pin 
 512MB(256MBx2) DDR PC-3200 - Retail
 (x2 = 1gig)
 
 plus a good case will be $960! woot!
 The other stuff will come over from my old PC.
 
 Will Linux be happy with Hyperthreading and this particular Mobo?  I'm 
 going to do some googling but I wondered if any could share experiences.
 
 Links:
 
 CPU:
 http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc.asp?description=19-116-164catalog=343manufactory=BROWSEdepa=1
 Mobo:
 http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc.asp?description=13-131-464depa=1
 Memory:
 http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc.asp?description=20-145-431catalog=147manufactory=BROWSEdepa=1

I would consider another MB manufacture, as Asus has had problems with quality of as 
late.

http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=13674

Ok this might effect their AMD line, but do you really trust a MB company which uses
only one type of capacitors for only one line? I would much prefer you to have a long
lasting computer with your hard earned cash. Also you could save a few dollars by 
choosing
a different MB manufacture. Also do you really need a 3.2 Ghz chip, you could save a 
bundle
on a 2.8 Ghz chip.  Also make sure you get a new power supply, if it comes with the 
case
make sure it will be big enough. Antec does a good job with PS bundles with their 
cases, or
I like fortran which powers my dual rig. Otherwise everything looks good, if you went 
AMD you
could save even more money, unless you went 64 which would be about the same.

I don't know if the Pat extensions are coded for linux yet, but everything should be
available in the newer kernels.

Rthoreau


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Buying a new computer, questions!

2004-02-02 Thread Nano Nano
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 01:02:47PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I would consider another MB manufacture, as Asus has had problems with quality of as 
 late.
 
 http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=13674
 
 Ok this might effect their AMD line, but do you really trust a MB company which uses
 only one type of capacitors for only one line? I would much prefer you to have a long
 lasting computer with your hard earned cash. Also you could save a few dollars by 
 choosing
 a different MB manufacture. Also do you really need a 3.2 Ghz chip, you could save a 
 bundle
 on a 2.8 Ghz chip.  Also make sure you get a new power supply, if it comes with the 
 case
 make sure it will be big enough. Antec does a good job with PS bundles with their 
 cases, or
 I like fortran which powers my dual rig. Otherwise everything looks good, if you 
 went AMD you
 could save even more money, unless you went 64 which would be about the same.

I'm basing my buying decision on Tom's Hardware.  His last two reviews 
on the P4 (3.4 Extreme  the Memory Timings one) have been with:

Asus P4C800-E Deluxe, Rev. 1.02
Intel 875P Chipset
BIOS: 1014
4x Corsiar TwinX CMX256A-3200LL (XMS32005V1.1)
256 MB per DIMM
CL 2.0 - tRCD 2 - tRP 2 - tRAS 6 for 133 and 200 MHz FSB

That fellow is German, I trust Germans to steer me right in general (I 
love their sense of ergonomics and design) and this guy in particular 
seems to give good advice.  I don't care (much) about overclocking.  The 
2.8 is only $60 cheaper, since the 3.4 is out people are dropping prices 
on the 3.2 (but they're not in stock!).

I dunno, I might end up waiting.  I currently have a P4 1.7 Willamette 
(RDRAM-800) from 2001 with a Radeon 9700: it looks like I'll get 50% 
better framerates in games and 100% faster times encoding MP3s in lame.

This low-latency ram is supposed to be nice.  All my games play 
extremely well but Doom 3 is about out.  Plus it would be nice to cut 
down DVD-transcoding and stuff, that takes hours.

Anyway, thanks.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: I can't ever boot-up with my new computer!!!

2000-08-11 Thread Francesco Bochicchio
On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 10:46:32AM -0700, Karl Matheson wrote:
 Hey,
 
 I can't install Linux, because when I boot of the 2.1 CD, it dies, showing
 me the stack. It looks like this:
 
 SNIP.../SNIP
 scsi : 0 hosts
 scisi : detected total
 Partition check:
 hda : hda1 hda2
 RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0
 general protection: 
 CPU: 0
 EIP: 0010:[0017f759]
 EFLAGS: 00010206
 eax: 0001 ebx: 4a88 ecx: 000 edx: 03fe3d94
 esi: 03fe3d98 edi: 03fe4a9c ebp: 3d80 esp: 0038f714
 ds: 0018 es: 0018 fs: 0018 gs: 0018 ss: 0018
 Process swapper (pid: 1, process nr: 1, stackpage=0038f000)
 Stack:  0038f78c 0004  0004 03fe4a98 00
 00 003f
 01ff 4a84  0017fff9 00e40020 00091c14
 0009 0006
 0001 0038fca8  0038fd3c 4 0216
 001e 011e
 Call Trace:  [0017fff9]  [00130c00]  [0010ac15]  [00121550]
 [001097fa]  [001095
 12]  [00109519]  [0010976c]
 Code: 8d 76 00 8b 15 4c ese 27 00 8a 44 15 00 8b 4c 24  24 88 04 11
 
 Thanks,
 Cameron Matheson

Possibly (just a guess), you have a processor which is not supported by the
kernel shipped with Debian 2.1 (linux 2.0.36 is quite old, after all)? 
For instance, if you have an AMD Atlon (like me ), you cannot boot from 
Debian 2.1. 
I think there are others CPUs not compatible with Debian 2.1, but I don't 
knwow where the list is ( somewhere in www.debian.org, I think )

If this is the case, there are several solutions :
- wait for debian 2.2 CDs - it should not be long, now
- download Debian 2.2 from the net
- Install from debian-based commercial distribution which has newer kernels
  (Corel, Storm and Libranet come to my mind), then use package manager
  tools to add others debian packages and remove the ones you don't like. 
- boot from a floppy made by someone with a kernel 2.2.x, then install
  debian from hard disk ( never tried this )

Ciao.
-- 
FB



Re: I can't ever boot-up with my new computer!!!

2000-08-11 Thread Jason J
I thought this was a potential bad memory problem. When I get these kinds of 
errors
consistently I grab my memtest86(check freshmeat.net) boot disk and check it 
out. But
I could be totally wrong on this.


Francesco Bochicchio wrote:

 On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 10:46:32AM -0700, Karl Matheson wrote:
  Hey,
 
  I can't install Linux, because when I boot of the 2.1 CD, it dies, showing
  me the stack. It looks like this:
 
  SNIP.../SNIP
  scsi : 0 hosts
  scisi : detected total
  Partition check:
  hda : hda1 hda2
  RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0
  general protection: 
  CPU: 0
  EIP: 0010:[0017f759]
  EFLAGS: 00010206
  eax: 0001 ebx: 4a88 ecx: 000 edx: 03fe3d94
  esi: 03fe3d98 edi: 03fe4a9c ebp: 3d80 esp: 0038f714
  ds: 0018 es: 0018 fs: 0018 gs: 0018 ss: 0018
  Process swapper (pid: 1, process nr: 1, stackpage=0038f000)
  Stack:  0038f78c 0004  0004 03fe4a98 00
  00 003f
  01ff 4a84  0017fff9 00e40020 00091c14
  0009 0006
  0001 0038fca8  0038fd3c 4 0216
  001e 011e
  Call Trace:  [0017fff9]  [00130c00]  [0010ac15]  [00121550]
  [001097fa]  [001095
  12]  [00109519]  [0010976c]
  Code: 8d 76 00 8b 15 4c ese 27 00 8a 44 15 00 8b 4c 24  24 88 04 11
 
  Thanks,
  Cameron Matheson
 
 Possibly (just a guess), you have a processor which is not supported by the
 kernel shipped with Debian 2.1 (linux 2.0.36 is quite old, after all)?
 For instance, if you have an AMD Atlon (like me ), you cannot boot from
 Debian 2.1.
 I think there are others CPUs not compatible with Debian 2.1, but I don't
 knwow where the list is ( somewhere in www.debian.org, I think )

 If this is the case, there are several solutions :
 - wait for debian 2.2 CDs - it should not be long, now
 - download Debian 2.2 from the net
 - Install from debian-based commercial distribution which has newer kernels
   (Corel, Storm and Libranet come to my mind), then use package manager
   tools to add others debian packages and remove the ones you don't like.
 - boot from a floppy made by someone with a kernel 2.2.x, then install
   debian from hard disk ( never tried this )

 Ciao.
 --
 FB

 --
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null



I can't ever boot-up with my new computer!!!

2000-08-10 Thread Karl Matheson
Hey,

I can't install Linux, because when I boot of the 2.1 CD, it dies, showing
me the stack. It looks like this:

SNIP.../SNIP
scsi : 0 hosts
scisi : detected total
Partition check:
hda : hda1 hda2
RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0
general protection: 
CPU: 0
EIP: 0010:[0017f759]
EFLAGS: 00010206
eax: 0001 ebx: 4a88 ecx: 000 edx: 03fe3d94
esi: 03fe3d98 edi: 03fe4a9c ebp: 3d80 esp: 0038f714
ds: 0018 es: 0018 fs: 0018 gs: 0018 ss: 0018
Process swapper (pid: 1, process nr: 1, stackpage=0038f000)
Stack:  0038f78c 0004  0004 03fe4a98 00
00 003f
01ff 4a84  0017fff9 00e40020 00091c14
0009 0006
0001 0038fca8  0038fd3c 4 0216
001e 011e
Call Trace:  [0017fff9]  [00130c00]  [0010ac15]  [00121550]
[001097fa]  [001095
12]  [00109519]  [0010976c]
Code: 8d 76 00 8b 15 4c ese 27 00 8a 44 15 00 8b 4c 24  24 88 04 11

Thanks,
Cameron Matheson



new computer ??

2000-04-06 Thread Hunter H Marshall
I'm considering a new computer. I was considering 2, but maybe I'll turn my
100MHZ pentium into a dedicated browser for family needs.

ANYhoo, does anyone have good/bad experiences with any of the linux hardware
vedors, VALinux, etc? Are the newest machines from Gateway, Dell, etc presenting
any hardware compatibility issues? Strong opinions between regular PC sellers
vs. the linux harwdare sellers?

This is to run Debian, and maybe win9x.

Thanks

hunter


Re: new computer ??

2000-04-06 Thread aphro
there are and always will be issues.

as always stick to standard hardware for best results.  avoid win*
stuff(modems especially), most oem systems should be mostly compadible
with exception of the modem 90% or so ship with a winmodem as standard,
most usually have a hardware modem as an option though.  of course its
best to buy from a vendor that will tell you 'yes it'll run linux!'.  I
have found SAG Electronics to be an excellent OEM. they use all top
quality stuff, www.sagelec.com they have great prices, but i dont think
they offer anything real cheap/low end, most of their stuff is workstation
or server class, you may be able to find something for under $1000 though.

cybermax has mostly compadible systems as well one of my friends got an
athlon 550 from em last year, only thing he had to swap was the
modem. suse 6.3 installed somewhat easily (i had to tweak his X config for
his savage4)

nate

On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Hunter H Marshall wrote:

marsha I'm considering a new computer. I was considering 2, but maybe I'll 
turn my
marsha 100MHZ pentium into a dedicated browser for family needs.
marsha 
marsha ANYhoo, does anyone have good/bad experiences with any of the linux 
hardware
marsha vedors, VALinux, etc? Are the newest machines from Gateway, Dell, etc 
presenting
marsha any hardware compatibility issues? Strong opinions between regular PC 
sellers
marsha vs. the linux harwdare sellers?
marsha 
marsha This is to run Debian, and maybe win9x.
marsha 
marsha Thanks
marsha 
marsha hunter
marsha 
marsha 
marsha -- 
marsha Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null
marsha 

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]--
   Vice President Network Operations   http://www.firetrail.com/
  Firetrail Internet Services Limited  http://www.aphroland.org/
   Everett, WA 425-348-7336http://www.linuxpowered.net/
Powered By:http://comedy.aphroland.org/
Debian 2.1 Linux 2.0.36 SMPhttp://yahoo.aphroland.org/
-[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]--
7:03pm up 9 days, 43 min, 2 users, load average: 0.15, 0.13, 0.09


  1   2   >