Re: off topic - scsi partitions swap raid

2000-09-21 Thread C. Falconer
Concur with Wesley -  raid on one drive is like mounting a ramdisk as /tmp 
- pointless because any benefits from the technique are nullified by the 
way you've done it.


Now for:
raid 0 (striping) min drives 2, reads and writes faster, no reduncancy.
raid 1 min drives 3, 2/3 of your total disk space is available.  Fault 
tolerant.

raid 4 min drives 3(?) One whole drive is for parity.
raid 5 min drives 3, distributed parity bits, allows one disk to fail.
raid 6 min drives 4, distributed parity bits, allows for two disks to fail.

I'd recommend two more 18 Gb drives for a speedy 54 Gb raid 0, or a 36 Gb 
raid 1 or 5.


(from the guy who has been playing with raid on three 80 Mb conner scsi 
drives.)
(next plan is to make a raid 0 or 5 over a raid0(80+80+80) + raid0(80+160) 
+ 250 Mb

drives.  Need more power supplies first :)

At 03:31 PM 9/20/00 -0500, you wrote:

I picked up a 18 gig drive.  I was planning on doing 3 6 gig partitions and
raid'n two of the partitions for linux.  Question is what about the 
swap?  Would

I really need to do two 6 gig, 2 128 meg, then what's left for windows?

This will be my first time for raid  scsi under linux, is there a nice howto
that covers both?


--
Criggie



Re: off topic - scsi partitions swap raid

2000-09-21 Thread Mike Leone
Now for:
raid 0 (striping) min drives 2, reads and writes faster, no reduncancy.
raid 1 min drives 3, 2/3 of your total disk space is available.  Fault 
tolerant.

You mean minimum 2 drives, don't you? And usable space is 1/2? I believe raid 1 
is also known as mirroring.



--
*-^-*-^-*-^-*-^-*-^-*-^-*-^-*-^-*-^-*-^-*-^-*-^-*-^-*
Michael Leone 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
--



Re: off topic - scsi partitions swap raid

2000-09-21 Thread C. Falconer

At 08:57 AM 9/21/00 -0400, you wrote:

Now for:
raid 0 (striping) min drives 2, reads and writes faster, no reduncancy.
raid 1 min drives 3, 2/3 of your total disk space is available.  Fault
tolerant.

You mean minimum 2 drives, don't you? And usable space is 1/2? I believe 
raid 1 is also known as mirroring.


Yup yup - sorry about that...  too much fudging on my part :)

To all the geeks of the list - If you want to go on and do something, learn 
something new then messing with raid is a good thing to do...  install 
bonnie and raidtools, and decide for yourself whats good and bad about raid.



--
Criggie



RE: off topic - scsi partitions swap raid

2000-09-21 Thread Christian Pernegger


 -Original Message-
 From: Wesley Wannemacher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 11:07 PM
 To: William Jensen; debian-user@lists.debian.org
 Subject: RE: off topic - scsi partitions  swap  raid
 
 
 Let me get this straight...
 Are you going to RAID two partitions on the same physical drive?
 Seems kinda absurd, RAID accomplishes one (or more) of two things:
 Fault-tolerance from hardware failure.
 Improve read/write performance, by spanning multiple physical disks.
 
 By mirroring, striping, etc. two partitions on the same physical
 disk you are wasting your time. Unless it is purely for practice.

He might even damage his drive. It'd mean constant seeking, after all.


Christian 



off topic - scsi partitions swap raid

2000-09-20 Thread William Jensen
Hey scsi fans,

I picked up a 18 gig drive.  I was planning on doing 3 6 gig partitions and
raid'n two of the partitions for linux.  Question is what about the swap?  Would
I really need to do two 6 gig, 2 128 meg, then what's left for windows?

This will be my first time for raid  scsi under linux, is there a nice howto
that covers both?


Wm



RE: off topic - scsi partitions swap raid

2000-09-20 Thread Wesley Wannemacher
Let me get this straight...
Are you going to RAID two partitions on the same physical drive?
Seems kinda absurd, RAID accomplishes one (or more) of two things:
Fault-tolerance from hardware failure.
Improve read/write performance, by spanning multiple physical disks.

By mirroring, striping, etc. two partitions on the same physical
disk you are wasting your time. Unless it is purely for practice.

Wes

Wesley Wannemacher
Instructor, Network Administrator
University of Northwestern Ohio
http://www.unoh.edu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -Original Message-
 From: William Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 4:31 PM
 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
 Subject: off topic - scsi partitions  swap  raid
 
 
 Hey scsi fans,
 
 I picked up a 18 gig drive.  I was planning on doing 3 6 gig 
 partitions and
 raid'n two of the partitions for linux.  Question is what about 
 the swap?  Would
 I really need to do two 6 gig, 2 128 meg, then what's left for windows?
 
 This will be my first time for raid  scsi under linux, is there 
 a nice howto
 that covers both?
 
 
 Wm
 
 
 -- 
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null