open-jdk
When ever I update my Debian Sid installation and it involves open-jdk I get this warning when it's being configured: update-binfmts: warning: current package is openjdk-7, but binary format already installed by openjdk-6 Is this something to be concerned about or is it just informative? Why do I have two versions of open-jdk installed ? Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52ed0801.9040...@videotron.ca
Re: open-jdk
Hi. On Sat, 01 Feb 2014 09:43:13 -0500 Frank McCormick debianl...@videotron.ca wrote: When ever I update my Debian Sid installation and it involves open-jdk I get this warning when it's being configured: update-binfmts: warning: current package is openjdk-7, but binary format already installed by openjdk-6 Is this something to be concerned about or is it just informative? Well, if you happen to have a file with .jar extension, which has executable bit set, and try to execute such file, it will be executed with java from openjdk-6. Whenever this will break something, or not, is up to you to decide. Why do I have two versions of open-jdk installed ? Probably because some package had openjdk-6 as a dependency. Try to remove openjdk-6, see what happens. Reco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140201212349.b2a3280bbf1613f06c64c...@gmail.com
Re: open-jdk
Ahoj, Dňa Sat, 1 Feb 2014 21:23:49 +0400 Reco recovery...@gmail.com napísal: Hi. On Sat, 01 Feb 2014 09:43:13 -0500 Frank McCormick debianl...@videotron.ca wrote: When ever I update my Debian Sid installation and it involves open-jdk I get this warning when it's being configured: update-binfmts: warning: current package is openjdk-7, but binary format already installed by openjdk-6 Is this something to be concerned about or is it just informative? Well, if you happen to have a file with .jar extension, which has executable bit set, and try to execute such file, it will be executed with java from openjdk-6. Whenever this will break something, or not, is up to you to decide. One can select desired jexec-binfmt via udpate-alternatives, if there are more choices. I have only one from openjdk-7-jre-headless package on testing. You can to have broken alternative here, or you have more choices and old openjdk-6 is set. regards -- Slavko http://slavino.sk signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: open-jdk
On 01/02/14 12:23 PM, Reco wrote: Hi. On Sat, 01 Feb 2014 09:43:13 -0500 Frank McCormick debianl...@videotron.ca wrote: When ever I update my Debian Sid installation and it involves open-jdk I get this warning when it's being configured: update-binfmts: warning: current package is openjdk-7, but binary format already installed by openjdk-6 Is this something to be concerned about or is it just informative? Well, if you happen to have a file with .jar extension, which has executable bit set, and try to execute such file, it will be executed with java from openjdk-6. Whenever this will break something, or not, is up to you to decide. Why do I have two versions of open-jdk installed ? Probably because some package had openjdk-6 as a dependency. Try to remove openjdk-6, see what happens. I purged it and it's gone - at the same time openjdk7 is now the preferred one. Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52ed39d8.1010...@videotron.ca
Re: open-jdk
On 01/02/14 12:51 PM, Slavko wrote: Ahoj, Dňa Sat, 1 Feb 2014 21:23:49 +0400 Reco recovery...@gmail.com napísal: Hi. On Sat, 01 Feb 2014 09:43:13 -0500 Frank McCormick debianl...@videotron.ca wrote: When ever I update my Debian Sid installation and it involves open-jdk I get this warning when it's being configured: update-binfmts: warning: current package is openjdk-7, but binary format already installed by openjdk-6 Is this something to be concerned about or is it just informative? Well, if you happen to have a file with .jar extension, which has executable bit set, and try to execute such file, it will be executed with java from openjdk-6. Whenever this will break something, or not, is up to you to decide. One can select desired jexec-binfmt via udpate-alternatives, if there are more choices. I have only one from openjdk-7-jre-headless package on testing. You can to have broken alternative here, or you have more choices and old openjdk-6 is set. regards Well after purging 6 I too have only one openjdk-7. Seems to have solved the problem.. we'll see :) Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52ed3a14.20...@videotron.ca
Re: open-jdk
On 02/02/14 01:43, Frank McCormick wrote: When ever I update my Debian Sid installation and it involves open-jdk I get this warning when it's being configured: update-binfmts: warning: current package is openjdk-7, but binary format already installed by openjdk-6 Is this something to be concerned about or is it just informative? Why do I have two versions of open-jdk installed ? Because you can. :) Seriously. Thanks See which one is in use # update-alternatives --display java Kind regards -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52ed8799.1080...@gmail.com
Re: open-jdk
On 01/02/14 06:47 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote: update-alternatives --display java [root@localhost frank]# update-alternatives --display java java - status is manual. link currently points to /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.4.1.fc19.i386/jre/bin/java /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.4.1.fc19.i386/jre/bin/java - priority 170051 slave keytool: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.4.1.fc19.i386/jre/bin/keytool slave orbd: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.4.1.fc19.i386/jre/bin/orbd slave pack200: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.4.1.fc19.i386/jre/bin/pack200 slave rmid: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.4.1.fc19.i386/jre/bin/rmid slave rmiregistry: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.4.1.fc19.i386/jre/bin/rmiregistry slave servertool: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.4.1.fc19.i386/jre/bin/servertool slave tnameserv: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.4.1.fc19.i386/jre/bin/tnameserv slave unpack200: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.4.1.fc19.i386/jre/bin/unpack200 slave jre_exports: /usr/lib/jvm-exports/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.4.1.fc19.i386 slave jre: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.4.1.fc19.i386/jre slave java.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/java-java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.4.1.fc19.i386.1.gz slave keytool.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/keytool-java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.4.1.fc19.i386.1.gz slave orbd.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/orbd-java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.4.1.fc19.i386.1.gz slave pack200.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/pack200-java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.4.1.fc19.i386.1.gz slave rmid.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/rmid-java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.4.1.fc19.i386.1.gz slave rmiregistry.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/rmiregistry-java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.4.1.fc19.i386.1.gz slave servertool.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/servertool-java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.4.1.fc19.i386.1.gz slave tnameserv.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/tnameserv-java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.4.1.fc19.i386.1.gz slave unpack200.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/unpack200-java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.4.1.fc19.i386.1.gz Current `best' version is /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.4.1.fc19.i386/jre/bin/java. [root@localhost frank]# More info that I ever wanted :) -- Your mail is being read by tight-lipped NSA agents who fail to see the humor in Doctor Strangelove. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52ed8c80.4000...@videotron.ca
