On 9/4/14, Darac Marjal mailingl...@darac.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 06:35:30PM -0700, Rusi Mody wrote:
Now dist-upgrade is bringing back these (and some others):
libpolkit-agent-1-0{a} libpolkit-backend-1-0{a} libupower-glib3{a}
policykit-1{a}
Is that ok?
If in doubt, install apt-listbugs first. That will warn you if there are
any important bugs affecting the to-be-installed versions. Read the bug
reports and see if they apply in your situation and then either install
the packages or use apt-listbugs to apply a pin which will skip the
installation of the buggy package (when a fixed package arrives, you'll
get the opportunity to upgrade as normal).
Stumbled back on this while trying to find threads referencing
policykit. Feels appropriate to highlight with it seeming there's a
lot of mention of bugs lately. Had never heard of apt-listbugs.
Installed after reading the above suggestion. A basic example of its
output:
elf@northpole:~$ apt-listbugs list apt
Retrieving bug reports... Done
Parsing Found/Fixed information... Done
serious bugs of apt (- ) marked as done in some version
#558784 - apt: re-adds removed keys (Fixed: 0.9.10)
#701048 - many squeeze-wheezy upgrades fail with Could not perform
immediate configuration (Fixed: apt/0.9.9)
Merged with: 645713
Summary:
apt(2 bugs)
I've also had it interrupt installs by pointing out a bug or bugs then
asking if the user wants to continue installing or abort to do further
research first. I can't help wondering out loud if broader use of any
tool of this type that is specific to a user's CHOICE of package
managers might somehow draw in faster bug fixes purely due to more
exposure..
Cindy :)
--
Cindy-Sue Causey
Talking Rock, Pickens County, Georgia, USA
* runs with duct tape *
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/CAO1P-kBiBAxAU5+JyPUyKa56ciqLZBg=BQp0cuNZ=4pda+f...@mail.gmail.com