Re: Staroffice libc5 5.4.38-0.1

1998-01-13 Thread Pedro Quaresma de Almeida
X-Authentication-Warning: dakota.gate.net: storm owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 1998 13:42:06 -0500 (EST)
From: Scott Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12 Jan 1998, Pedro Quaresma de Almeida wrote:

 Hi
 
 I have a Linux system with libc5 (5.4.20-1) were all the Staroffice
 programs are working correctly.
 
 I have another Linux system with libc5 (5.4.38-0.1) were I can not
 run the Staroffice setup program, whem I try...
 
StarOffice3.1 Installation Tool
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
 
 Can you help me? 
 
 I need the last version of libc5 because I need the last version of
 xbase (I have a matrox millenium II), so I need libc6, so I need libc5
 (last version).

The setup script is being confused by your xlib6g (the rest of the
staroffice stuff works).  A hack to get it to work is to rename
/usr/XllR6/lib to /usr/X11R6/libx, run the setup util, then rename the
directory back.


Thank you. I have done what you suggest and it worked fine.

-- 
At\'e breve
===

Pedro Quaresma de Almeida
Departamento de Matem\'atica
Faculdade de Ci\^encias e Tecnologia
Universidade de Coimbra
P-3000 COIMBRA, PORTUGAL
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
url: http://www.mat.uc.pt/~pedro/


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Staroffice libc5 5.4.38-0.1

1998-01-12 Thread Pedro Quaresma de Almeida
Hi

I have a Linux system with libc5 (5.4.20-1) were all the Staroffice
programs are working correctly.

I have another Linux system with libc5 (5.4.38-0.1) were I can not
run the Staroffice setup program, whem I try...

   StarOffice3.1 Installation Tool
   Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Can you help me? 

I need the last version of libc5 because I need the last version of
xbase (I have a matrox millenium II), so I need libc6, so I need libc5
(last version).


-- 
At\'e breve
===

Pedro Quaresma de Almeida
Departamento de Matem\'atica
Faculdade de Ci\^encias e Tecnologia
Universidade de Coimbra
P-3000 COIMBRA, PORTUGAL
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
url: http://www.mat.uc.pt/~pedro/


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Staroffice libc5 5.4.38-0.1

1998-01-12 Thread Scott Ellis
On 12 Jan 1998, Pedro Quaresma de Almeida wrote:

 Hi
 
 I have a Linux system with libc5 (5.4.20-1) were all the Staroffice
 programs are working correctly.
 
 I have another Linux system with libc5 (5.4.38-0.1) were I can not
 run the Staroffice setup program, whem I try...
 
StarOffice3.1 Installation Tool
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
 
 Can you help me? 
 
 I need the last version of libc5 because I need the last version of
 xbase (I have a matrox millenium II), so I need libc6, so I need libc5
 (last version).

The setup script is being confused by your xlib6g (the rest of the
staroffice stuff works).  A hack to get it to work is to rename
/usr/XllR6/lib to /usr/X11R6/libx, run the setup util, then rename the
directory back.

-- 
Scott K. Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gate.net/~storm/


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Staroffice libc5 5.4.38-0.1

1998-01-12 Thread Richard E. Hawkins Esq.
 I have another Linux system with libc5 (5.4.38-0.1) were I can not
 run the Staroffice setup program, whem I try...

This probably isn't the answer you're looking for, but I solved this by using 
star office 4 rather than 3 . . .

rick

-- 
These opinions will not be those of ISU until it pays my retainer.



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: staroffice libc5

1997-12-12 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Thu, 11 Dec 1997, Rick Hawkins wrote:

 
 Bob Nielsen wrote,
 
  I think the requirement is : 5.4.4.  In anycase, it works fine for me with
  5.4.33.
 
 The next magic question, is are you using hamm or bo, and should it make a 
 difference?

I'm using bo, but I don't think that will be a problem if you keep a copy
of libc5 (not libc5-dev) when using hamm (I'm about to do the upgrade
here, which will require a downgrade from 5.4.33-6 to 5.4.33-3, but I
was using StarOffice before 5.4.33-6 came out.) 

Bob


Bob Nielsen Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson, AZ  AMPRnet:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.primenet.com/~nielsen


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


staroffice libc5

1997-12-11 Thread Rick Hawkins

When I try to run the setup for StarOffice, I get a 

eyryttyp4:hawk/usr/lib/StarOffice-3.1/setup 
StarOffice3.1 Installation Tool
Segmentation fault

Today I saw a posting in a nesgroup claiming that a minimum of libc5-5.4.38 is 
necessary.  Debian seems to stop at .33.

However, there's enough traffic here about it that it must somehow be 
possible.  could someone give me a hint?

rick



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: staroffice libc5

1997-12-11 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Thu, 11 Dec 1997, Rick Hawkins wrote:

 
 When I try to run the setup for StarOffice, I get a 
 
 eyryttyp4:hawk/usr/lib/StarOffice-3.1/setup 
 StarOffice3.1 Installation Tool
 Segmentation fault
 
 Today I saw a posting in a nesgroup claiming that a minimum of libc5-5.4.38 
 is 
 necessary.  Debian seems to stop at .33.

I think the requirement is : 5.4.4.  In anycase, it works fine for me with
5.4.33.

Bob


Bob Nielsen Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson, AZ  AMPRnet:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.primenet.com/~nielsen


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: staroffice libc5

1997-12-11 Thread Mike
take me off this list!

Bob Nielsen wrote:

 On Thu, 11 Dec 1997, Rick Hawkins wrote:

 
  When I try to run the setup for StarOffice, I get a
 
  eyryttyp4:hawk/usr/lib/StarOffice-3.1/setup
  StarOffice3.1 Installation Tool
  Segmentation fault
 
  Today I saw a posting in a nesgroup claiming that a minimum of libc5-5.4.38 
  is
  necessary.  Debian seems to stop at .33.

 I think the requirement is : 5.4.4.  In anycase, it works fine for me with
 5.4.33.

 Bob

 
 Bob Nielsen Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Tucson, AZ  AMPRnet:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.primenet.com/~nielsen

 --
 TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
 Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .




--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: staroffice libc5

1997-12-11 Thread Mike
take me off this list!

Bob Nielsen wrote:

 On Thu, 11 Dec 1997, Rick Hawkins wrote:

 
  When I try to run the setup for StarOffice, I get a
 
  eyryttyp4:hawk/usr/lib/StarOffice-3.1/setup
  StarOffice3.1 Installation Tool
  Segmentation fault
 
  Today I saw a posting in a nesgroup claiming that a minimum of libc5-5.4.38 
  is
  necessary.  Debian seems to stop at .33.

 I think the requirement is : 5.4.4.  In anycase, it works fine for me with
 5.4.33.

 Bob

 
 Bob Nielsen Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Tucson, AZ  AMPRnet:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.primenet.com/~nielsen

 --
 TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
 Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .




--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: staroffice libc5

1997-12-11 Thread Rick Hawkins

Bob Nielsen wrote,

 I think the requirement is : 5.4.4.  In anycase, it works fine for me with
 5.4.33.

The next magic question, is are you using hamm or bo, and should it make a 
difference?

rick





--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: staroffice libc5

1997-12-11 Thread Alan Su
This is odd...the level of civility on this list is astounding.  On
any other list I've been on, if someone were to write this, they would
immediately be ``punished''.  this is almost disconcerting...=)

Mike wrote (Thu, 11 Dec 1997 15:49:27 -0600 ):
|take me off this list!
|

Mike, and anyone else who would want to unsubscribe from this cool
list:

|--
|TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
|Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
|

This message is included in every mail which comes to you from the
list...including the ones to which you have replied.  Just follow
those directions, and if they don't work, send mail to the
administrator email, which is also specified in the message.  In the
future, you would do well to keep mail that you get when you first
sign on to any mailing list.  it usually has information about how to
unsubscribe.  I think you'll find nearly every other mailing list in
the known world to be less forgiving that this one...

I hope I haven't violated some unspoken convention for this list...
I'm not usually the one that ends up doing this...

-alan


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .