wheezy partition question

2012-03-26 Thread Tomas Kral
Hello List,

I am testing Wheezy on a separate partition of my hard disk.

The partitions I told the installer to use are, 

/dev/sda5 as root / mount point, and
/dev/sda6 as swap

Now to the question, why the partition starts at offset #2 while I would
expect #63? 

PLEASE NOTE 61 sectors shown as free
61 (+2=63 I thought should be the offset)

cfdisk reports:
==
   First   Last
 # Type   Sector  Sector   OffsetLength   Filesystem Type
(ID) Flag

 1 Primary   0   64259 63   64260 Linux (83)
Boot
   Pri/Log   64260   64320* 0  61*Free Space
None
 2 Primary   64321*   39857264  039792944*Extended (05)
None
 5 Logical   64321*7871849  2#7807529*Linux (83)
None
 6 Logical 7871850 8867879 63  996030 Linux swap / So
(82) None

I would expect:
==
   First   Last
 # Type   Sector  Sector   OffsetLength   Filesystem Type
(ID) Flag

1 Primary   0   64259 63   64260 Linux (83)
Boot
 2 Primary   6426039857264  039793005 Extended (05)
None
 5 Logical   64260 7871849 63 7807590 Linux (83)
None
 6 Logical 7871850 8867879 63  996030 Linux swap / So
(82) None

Is this really a problem, could I correct it at all?
Many thanks.

-- 
Tomas Kral thomas.k...@email.cz


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1332766395.3283.25.camel@lynx.localhost.localdomain



Re: wheezy partition question

2012-03-26 Thread Camaleón
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 14:53:15 +0200, Tomas Kral wrote:

 I am testing Wheezy on a separate partition of my hard disk.
 
 The partitions I told the installer to use are,
 
 /dev/sda5 as root / mount point, and
 /dev/sda6 as swap
 
 Now to the question, why the partition starts at offset #2 while I would
 expect #63?

(...)

Mine has an offset of 0 (though it's a primary partition for /), but 
not sure if this right, wrong, bad or good... if Debian partitioner made 
it in that way, it should be fine.

 Is this really a problem, could I correct it at all? Many thanks.

Are you experiencing any trouble, errors when booting or at the logs?

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jkq7ul$4vf$9...@dough.gmane.org



Re: wheezy partition question

2012-03-26 Thread Tomas Kral
Not sure, 

Logical partitions may start at offset 63, what is peculiar that the
partitioner, created offset 2 and a free space of 61 sectors, which
really is not free, 61+2 equals 63 that would be the right offset

On the same partition on my system used to be Lenny, and that was with
offset 63 and no free space.

My disk is repartitioned with no free space for many years. It just the
partiotioner that created free space of 61, that should really belong to
the offset.

-- 
Tomas Kral thomas.k...@email.cz

On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 19:10 +0200, Camaleón wrote:
 On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 14:53:15 +0200, Tomas Kral wrote:
 
  I am testing Wheezy on a separate partition of my hard disk.
  
  The partitions I told the installer to use are,
  
  /dev/sda5 as root / mount point, and
  /dev/sda6 as swap
  
  Now to the question, why the partition starts at offset #2 while I would
  expect #63?
 
 (...)
 
 Mine has an offset of 0 (though it's a primary partition for /), but 
 not sure if this right, wrong, bad or good... if Debian partitioner made 
 it in that way, it should be fine.
 
  Is this really a problem, could I correct it at all? Many thanks.
 
 Are you experiencing any trouble, errors when booting or at the logs?
 
 Greetings,
 
 -- 
 Camaleón
 
 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1332783062.3283.32.camel@lynx.localhost.localdomain