RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS server returned server failure for

2003-03-12 Thread R. Scott Perry

I have suffered from this also, so much so that I have even explored the use
of SimpleDNS without success thinking that this was a external DNS problem.
I was hoping that by bringing the DNS (as a DNS cache) locally to the mail
server did infact reduce the frequency of this error, unfortunately it did
not solve the occurance of this error.
Just to clarify why this is happening.

When Declude JunkMail is looking up the MX or A record for a hostname (such 
as for the HELOBOGUS test, or checking the domain of the return address), 
it will record this message if the local DNS server reports a server 
failure message.  Technically, this message indicates a problem with the 
local DNS server.

However, it seems that the RFCs do not cover what a caching DNS server is 
supposed to do if it receives a server failure message from a remote DNS 
server.  When this happens, some DNS servers will pass on the server 
failure message.

Declude JunkMail treats the server failure as a temporary error, and 
makes the assumption that the E-mail is not spam.  If that was changed, 
more spam could get caught (as a server failure almost always indicates 
that the DNS record doesn't exist).  But, if there was a real server 
failure on the local DNS server (if the Internet connection went out, for 
example, or if there was a DDoS attack on the root servers), then all 
E-mail would fail the spam tests.
   -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS server returned server failure for

2003-03-12 Thread Bill B.
I see server failures on a bunch of obviously fake hostnames:

WARNING: DNS server 216.12.134.208 returned a SERVER FAILURE error for MX or A for Me.
WARNING: DNS server 216.12.134.208 returned a SERVER FAILURE error for MX or A for 
host3.
WARNING: DNS server 216.12.134.208 returned a SERVER FAILURE error for MX or A for 
mailer1.
WARNING: DNS server 216.12.134.208 returned a SERVER FAILURE error for MX or A for 
jinge.

...Anything we can do to add a weight to these?  We do also see server failures on 
some hostnames were do have an A record, so I see the delema.  But it would be nice to 
at least add a weighting to the obvious fakes.

Bill


-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:00:14 -0500
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS server returned server failure for



I have suffered from this also, so much so that I have even explored the use
of SimpleDNS without success thinking that this was a external DNS problem.
I was hoping that by bringing the DNS (as a DNS cache) locally to the mail
server did infact reduce the frequency of this error, unfortunately it did
not solve the occurance of this error.

Just to clarify why this is happening.

When Declude JunkMail is looking up the MX or A record for a hostname (such 
as for the HELOBOGUS test, or checking the domain of the return address), 
it will record this message if the local DNS server reports a server 
failure message.  Technically, this message indicates a problem with the 
local DNS server.

However, it seems that the RFCs do not cover what a caching DNS server is 
supposed to do if it receives a server failure message from a remote DNS 
server.  When this happens, some DNS servers will pass on the server 
failure message.

Declude JunkMail treats the server failure as a temporary error, and 
makes the assumption that the E-mail is not spam.  If that was changed, 
more spam could get caught (as a server failure almost always indicates 
that the DNS record doesn't exist).  But, if there was a real server 
failure on the local DNS server (if the Internet connection went out, for 
example, or if there was a DDoS attack on the root servers), then all 
E-mail would fail the spam tests.
-Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS server returned server failure for

2003-03-12 Thread R. Scott Perry

I see server failures on a bunch of obviously fake hostnames:

WARNING: DNS server 216.12.134.208 returned a SERVER FAILURE error for MX 
or A for Me.
WARNING: DNS server 216.12.134.208 returned a SERVER FAILURE error for MX 
or A for host3.
WARNING: DNS server 216.12.134.208 returned a SERVER FAILURE error for MX 
or A for mailer1.
WARNING: DNS server 216.12.134.208 returned a SERVER FAILURE error for MX 
or A for jinge.

...Anything we can do to add a weight to these?  We do also see server 
failures on some hostnames were do have an A record, so I see the 
delema.  But it would be nice to at least add a weighting to the obvious fakes.
That's definitely a problem with the DNS server -- the server failure 
indicates a problem with the nameserver.  For hosts that are not fully 
qualified (such as Me), the DNS server should be reporting that the host 
does not exist.  In fact, it's possible for Me to have an MX record 
someday (unlikely, as there would need to be a country that used the .me 
ccTLD, and it would need to be set up to accept mail, but it could happen), 
so your DNS server technically should be contacting the root servers for 
these.  Although it is understandable that your DNS server does not look 
them up (the root servers get overwhelmed by these bogus lookups, whether 
caused by a spammer, or someone typing www.microsoft.cmo into their web 
browser), it should not be returning a server failure message.

For the non-fully-qualified host names, we might be able to automatically 
check for that, which would get around this problem.
   -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] JunkMail Kill List

2003-03-12 Thread Mark Scott
Anybody have any experience of using the Kill List at imagefxonline.net to
delete junkmail?

I'm using the excellent SpamReview app from slsoft.com but it's taking up
more and more of my time to go through the spam looking for the occasional
false positive (especially on a Monday morning!!).
I thought that if I could just delete 'known' spam then it would make the
whole process quicker and less taxing for me.

Thanks.
Mark Scott
IT Manager
CSC (UK) Ltd

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] HOWTO use the X-RBL-Warning: Possible ADULT Content

2003-03-12 Thread Adrian Titei
Hi guys,

Anybody knows hot to use the X-RBL-Warning: Possible ADULT Content
undocumented feature. Is there a manpage for it (even un-official)?

Thanks in advance,
Adrian

--
Regards,
Adrian Titei
Director of IT
Jumbo Entertainment Inc.

p: 905-634-4244 x 232
f: 905-632-2964
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

=== Confidentiality Notice: 
This e-mail message and any attachment to same  contains confidential
information intended only for the person(s) to whom the said e-mail is intended
to be sent.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or the
taking of any action and reliance upon this information by persons or entities
other than the intended recipient violates confidentiality and is prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail message in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the e-mail message from your computer.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] MSN

2003-03-12 Thread andyb
Hi,

MSN is not accepting email from my mail server, here is what the log file
entries look like:

20030312 001347 127.0.0.1   SMTP (259) Trying msn.com (0)
20030312 001347 127.0.0.1   SMTP (259) Connect msn.com
[207.46.181.13:25] (1)
20030312 001347 127.0.0.1   SMTP (259)
20030312 001347 127.0.0.1   SMTP (259) SMTP_DELIV_FAILED
20030312 001347 127.0.0.1   SMTP (259) QUIT
20030312 001347 127.0.0.1   SMTP (259)

Could this be I have been listed as a spammer (though I'm not) ?  How do I
find out?

Any other thoughts, or suggestions?

Thanks,
Andy

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] JunkMail Kill List

2003-03-12 Thread Kami Razvan
Hi;
We use Tom's list on an auto update using a script- updating our list twice
a day with his list.

It is a great list but we do not delete with that list.  We simply have a
hold weight for it and review the emails prior to deleting them.  At times
we have noticed that some newsletters are blocked by that list since some of
these newsletter broadcasters also send for some spammers... I think it is a
definite plus to use it, at least as a weight list if not more severe
action.

We also have a large number of files that you may wish to use if you want.
We have several filter files that is used for URL's, phone, text, IP's, and
a blacklist as well as blacklists found in the header as well as blacklists
found in the body.

We update that list twice a day.  Let me know off list and I can gladly
point you to where you can download it...

Regards,
Kami

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Scott
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 12:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] JunkMail Kill List


Anybody have any experience of using the Kill List at imagefxonline.net to
delete junkmail?

I'm using the excellent SpamReview app from slsoft.com but it's taking up
more and more of my time to go through the spam looking for the occasional
false positive (especially on a Monday morning!!). I thought that if I could
just delete 'known' spam then it would make the whole process quicker and
less taxing for me.

Thanks.
Mark Scott
IT Manager
CSC (UK) Ltd

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MSN

2003-03-12 Thread Glenn \\ WCNet



MSN has been having mail troubles for about two 
weeks. Several of our users have complained. One contacted MSN, and 
they told her to have us call them. We did, and MSN said they had done 
some sort of maintenance procedure on their mail system, and something 
broke. At that point in time they expected to have the fix done within 48 
hours. Well, mail started going through again within about 12 hours, but 
it didn't last for long.

Interesting side note: I had occasion to make 
a tech call to Microsoft yesterday. Mail from their techie handling my 
case arrived about three hours late. He needed to send me a little test 
utility, and it didn't come through at all on his @microsoft.com address. 
He sent it through @hotmail.com and it did arrive. Several other messages 
from him arrived AFTER we had finished the case.

Glenn Z.


  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  andyb 
  
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 1:55 
  PM
  Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] MSN
  Hi,MSN is not accepting email from my mail server, here 
  is what the log fileentries look like:20030312 001347 
  127.0.0.1 SMTP (259) Trying msn.com 
  (0)20030312 001347 127.0.0.1 SMTP 
  (259) Connect msn.com[207.46.181.13:25] (1)20030312 001347 
  127.0.0.1 SMTP (259)20030312 001347 
  127.0.0.1 SMTP (259) 
  SMTP_DELIV_FAILED20030312 001347 
  127.0.0.1 SMTP (259) QUIT20030312 
  001347 127.0.0.1 SMTP (259)Could 
  this be I have been listed as a spammer (though I'm not) ? How do 
  Ifind out?Any other thoughts, or 
  suggestions?Thanks,Andy---[This E-mail was scanned for 
  viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]---This 
  E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, 
  just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype 
  "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MSN

2003-03-12 Thread andyb



Thanks,

That's very helpful, it was only happening to MSN 
email.

andy

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Glenn \ WCNet 
  
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 1:13 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MSN
  
  MSN has been having mail troubles for about two 
  weeks. Several of our users have complained. One contacted MSN, 
  and they told her to have us call them. We did, and MSN said they had 
  done some sort of maintenance procedure on their mail system, and something 
  broke. At that point in time they expected to have the fix done within 
  48 hours. Well, mail started going through again within about 12 hours, 
  but it didn't last for long.
  
  Interesting side note: I had occasion to 
  make a tech call to Microsoft yesterday. Mail from their techie handling 
  my case arrived about three hours late. He needed to send me a little 
  test utility, and it didn't come through at all on his @microsoft.com 
  address. He sent it through @hotmail.com and it did arrive. 
  Several other messages from him arrived AFTER we had finished the 
  case.
  
  Glenn Z.
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
andyb 

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 1:55 
PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] MSN
Hi,MSN is not accepting email from my mail server, 
here is what the log fileentries look like:20030312 001347 
127.0.0.1 SMTP (259) Trying msn.com 
(0)20030312 001347 127.0.0.1 SMTP 
(259) Connect msn.com[207.46.181.13:25] (1)20030312 001347 
127.0.0.1 SMTP (259)20030312 001347 
127.0.0.1 SMTP (259) 
SMTP_DELIV_FAILED20030312 001347 
127.0.0.1 SMTP (259) 
QUIT20030312 001347 127.0.0.1 
SMTP (259)Could this be I have been listed as a spammer (though I'm 
not) ? How do Ifind out?Any other thoughts, or 
suggestions?Thanks,Andy---[This E-mail was scanned 
for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]---This 
E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, 
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype 
"unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HOWTO use the X-RBL-Warning: PossibleADULT Content

2003-03-12 Thread R. Scott Perry

Anybody knows hot to use the X-RBL-Warning: Possible ADULT Content
undocumented feature. Is there a manpage for it (even un-official)?
There used to be an undocumented adult test in Declude JunkMail, but it 
was removed because it was taking too much support time to deal 
with.  However, SpamManager ( http://www.spammanager.com ) has a major 
emphasis on detecting adult E-mail.
   -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] HELO contains

2003-03-12 Thread Eje Gustafsson
Question..

I see more and more spams that is coming where the senders MTA is
claiming to be the localhost
As for example one of my servers is called imail.fament.com
Latest spam that slipped through had following header

Received: from imail.fament.com [66.81.201.98] by imail.fament.com
  (SMTPD32-7.13) id A7F38560150; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:42:59 -0600

Note that 66.81.201.98 is the spammers ip and do NOT belong to me.

SOO..  My question is this.. Could I create a wordfilter rule that
goes like
HELO 10 CONTAINS imail.fament.com
or will that shoot myself in the foot for some reason ?
If it really is the HELO string then I don't see this as a problem
since my understanding is that my mail server do NOT connect to itself
and should then never send the helo imail.fament.com to itself ?!

Best regards,
 Eje Gustafsson   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
The Family Entertainment Network  http://www.fament.com
Phone : 620-231-  Fax   : 620-231-4066
eBay UserID : macahan
  - Your Full Time Professionals -

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HELO contains

2003-03-12 Thread R. Scott Perry

SOO..  My question is this.. Could I create a wordfilter rule that
goes like
HELO 10 CONTAINS imail.fament.com
or will that shoot myself in the foot for some reason ?
That will work fine, just so long as you don't have any other mailservers 
that identify themselves as imail.fament.com.  If your IMail server is 
the only one that does, the filter will work fine.

If it really is the HELO string then I don't see this as a problem
since my understanding is that my mail server do NOT connect to itself
and should then never send the helo imail.fament.com to itself ?!
Correct.  There might be odd cases where the IMail server would connect to 
itself, but if that happens, you've got another problem on your hands (as 
it would cause a mail loop).
-Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bounce Action and IMail Server Relay

2003-03-12 Thread Dan Geiser
Hi, John,
Or anyone else for that matter.

Can someone help fill in some blanks about how we would use our IMail Server
as a Gateway to Store and Forward as described below?  I did search the
IMail KB as John suggested and found this...

How to use IMail as SMTP Gateway for another e-mail server
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-19980116-DM01.htm

From what I can tell you want to do the following...

1) Point the MX record of the domain name in question, e.g. ACME.COM, to the
IP Address of our IMail Server.
2) Using the steps described in the above link edit the hosts file to
point the domain name ACME.COM to the IP Address of the Destination Mail
Server.

Which all seems very simple.

How does IMail know to accept incoming SMTP Mail for a domain name that is
not defined in it's internal database?  We use SMTP Authentication for POP3
customers who want to route their outgoing SMTP Mail through us.  Does that
prevent this Store and Forward scenario from happening?

Any feedback for the above or further tips for doing this as described in
the below e-mail are welcome.

Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]

- Original Message -
From: John Tolmachoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 4:28 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Bounce Action and IMail Server Relay


 Currently we are planning on offering Spam Filtering (once we finish
 testing) to our current e-mail hosting customers, i.e. those hosted on our
 IMail server.  We also have a few customers who don't host e-mail with us
 but would probably be interested in spam filtering if we had it available.
 For those who don't host with us we were thinking we could let them relay
 their e-mail through our system, filter out their spam, and then send it
on
 the way.  I know this question might be better posted to the IMail Server
 discussion list but I thought I would try here first.  Can IMail Server be
 configured to act as a relay in this manner?  I don't have tons of
 experience with IMail (only enough to be dangerous), so forgive me if
that's
 a silly question.  If IMail can be configured as a relay for Incoming Mail
 as I described, do you know where the IMail interface I might configure
it,
 or perhaps a piece of documentation that would outline this setup?

This is and can be done quite easily, and I am doing that here.

Search the Imail KB for Store and Forward and Gateway.

Also search the Declude Junkmail Archives.

I can give you a detailed how to but I am swamped right now. If some one
else can explain it...

John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA  92835
www.reliancesoft.com



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
===
This E-mail is scanned and free from viruses. www.nexustechgroup.com



This E-mail is scanned and free from viruses. www.nexustechgroup.com

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] HELO contains

2003-03-12 Thread Eje Gustafsson
Alright. Great. No the other mailserver identifies itself as
backup.fament.com which I don't have declude on.
On the other hand there. My backup mx server only forward mail. Do I
have to get the Pro version of Declude or would Standard be enough ?

I did throw out Webshield because it records the headers so badly that
so much junkmail came in that direction.

/ Eje

Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 5:17:33 PM, you wrote:


SOO..  My question is this.. Could I create a wordfilter rule that
goes like
HELO 10 CONTAINS imail.fament.com
or will that shoot myself in the foot for some reason ?

RSP That will work fine, just so long as you don't have any other mailservers 
RSP that identify themselves as imail.fament.com.  If your IMail server is 
RSP the only one that does, the filter will work fine.

If it really is the HELO string then I don't see this as a problem
since my understanding is that my mail server do NOT connect to itself
and should then never send the helo imail.fament.com to itself ?!

RSP Correct.  There might be odd cases where the IMail server would connect to 
RSP itself, but if that happens, you've got another problem on your hands (as 
RSP it would cause a mail loop).
RSP  -Scott

RSP ---
RSP [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

RSP ---
RSP This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
RSP unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
RSP type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
RSP at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RSP ---
RSP [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]




Best regards,
 Eje Gustafsson   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
The Family Entertainment Network  http://www.fament.com
Phone : 620-231-  Fax   : 620-231-4066
eBay UserID : macahan
  - Your Full Time Professionals -

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] HELO contains

2003-03-12 Thread R. Scott Perry

Alright. Great. No the other mailserver identifies itself as
backup.fament.com which I don't have declude on.
On the other hand there. My backup mx server only forward mail. Do I
have to get the Pro version of Declude or would Standard be enough ?
The Standard version will work fine in this case.
   -Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] How did this Spammer get through?

2003-03-12 Thread Brian Cunningham
I've got several held emails from a spammer trying to use our system for
relay.

I've got the box locked down to only accept relay from authenticated
users, but somehow this guy got through.

Luckily, I've got hijack on the box, which has blocked all of his
emails.

Here's an example of the email he's trying to relay through:

Received: from 208.253.112.160 [169.207.38.237] by richmond.com
  (SMTPD32-7.07) id A450F9200BE; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 18:35:44 -0500
Received: from 0e.ygr0.net ([143.95.123.108]) by 208.253.112.160 with
SMTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 22:30:43 -0100
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mervin Crow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: re: Increase Your Gas Mileage by up to 27% ohvs eex
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 03 22:30:43 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.52f) Business
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary=15978B3_057.85AE_.850_

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--15978B3_057.85AE_.850_
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

htmlbodyPaul athwartship,a href=3Dhttp://[EMAIL PROTECTED]
averpro.com
img src=3Dhttp://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/the.jpg width=3D536=
 height=3D505
/asalute beacon stumpweapon gapbr%RA=
NDOM_WORDhum implantation party dish/body/html
--15978B3_057.85AE_.850_--


How is he successfully getting through?

Also, how can I block him from coming through again?

Thanks.

Brian













-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 6:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HELO contains



SOO..  My question is this.. Could I create a wordfilter rule that goes

like HELO 10 CONTAINS imail.fament.com
or will that shoot myself in the foot for some reason ?

That will work fine, just so long as you don't have any other
mailservers 
that identify themselves as imail.fament.com.  If your IMail server is

the only one that does, the filter will work fine.

If it really is the HELO string then I don't see this as a problem 
since my understanding is that my mail server do NOT connect to itself 
and should then never send the helo imail.fament.com to itself ?!

Correct.  There might be odd cases where the IMail server would connect
to 
itself, but if that happens, you've got another problem on your hands
(as 
it would cause a mail loop).
 -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for Viruses and Spam by Richmond.com]


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How did this Spammer get through?

2003-03-12 Thread R. Scott Perry

Here's an example of the email he's trying to relay through:
The key information isn't in the headers in this case -- it's in the IMail 
SMTP log file.  Most importantly are the RCPT TO: lines, which will show 
who the E-mail was actually addressed to, and whether or not some hack was 
used to relay the E-mail.  If you post the IMail SMTP log file entries, I 
should be able to let you know what is going on.
 -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Whats up with blars.org?

2003-03-12 Thread Sheldon Koehler
This is from their web page:

In general, an entire netblock is added rather than just a single IP or
customer of a larger ISP. (For example, if hugeisp has a /16 that they
allocate a single /24 to spamcustomer, the /16 will be listed rather than
just the /24.) An entire ISP may be added if they show a pattern of
rejecting valid spam complaints for invalid reasons.

Our local hospital just contacted me (they are not a customer, but I know
their IT guy) that they were blocked by blars.org. They could not even get
to their web page! It seems they are an innocent victim of the above policy
of blocking the whole /16. I would urge anyone using this BL to stop using
it as this gives blocking it's undeserved bad reputation.

Now to see if I can help our hospital out...

Sheldon


Sheldon Koehler, Owner/Partnerhttp://www.tenforward.com
Ten Forward Communications   360-457-9023
Nationwide access, neighborhood support!

Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time
to pause and reflect. Mark Twain


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Bounce Action and IMail Server Relay

2003-03-12 Thread John Tolmachoff
 1) Point the MX record of the domain name in question, e.g. ACME.COM, to
the
 IP Address of our IMail Server.
 2) Using the steps described in the above link edit the hosts file to
 point the domain name ACME.COM to the IP Address of the Destination Mail
 Server.
 
 Which all seems very simple.

Accept left one step out. Must add the IP address of the mail server your
are SF for to Relay for Addresses list.

At the bottom of that KB: 

In SMTP Security (IMail Administrator | localhost) you must select Relay for
Addresses. List the IP address of the other mail server. In version 7.0 find
services under IMail Administrator | localhost | Services.

 How does IMail know to accept incoming SMTP Mail for a domain name that is
 not defined in it's internal database?  We use SMTP Authentication for
POP3
 customers who want to route their outgoing SMTP Mail through us.  Does
that
 prevent this Store and Forward scenario from happening?

By using the information in the HOSTS file and in the Relay for Addresses
file.

 Any feedback for the above or further tips for doing this as described in
 the below e-mail are welcome.

As you are using Declude, make sure you are using the latest version.

John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA  92835
www.reliancesoft.com



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How did this Spammer get through?

2003-03-12 Thread Brian Cunningham
Here you go:

03:12 18:35 SMTPD(0F9200BE) [169.207.38.237] HELO 208.253.112.160
03:12 18:35 SMTPD(0F9200BE) [169.207.38.237] MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
03:12 18:35 SMTPD(0F9200BE) [169.207.38.237] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
03:12 18:35 SMTPD(0F9200BE) [169.207.38.237] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
03:12 18:35 SMTPD(0F9200BE) [169.207.38.237] ERR richmond.com invalid user [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
03:12 18:35 SMTPD(0F9200BE) [169.207.38.237] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
03:12 18:35 SMTPD(0F9200BE) [169.207.38.237] ERR richmond.com invalid user [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
03:12 18:35 SMTPD(0F9200BE) [169.207.38.237] d:\IMail\spool\Dc4500f9200bec554.SMD 1114

So is he authenticating as a real user?

b



-- Original Message --
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:  Wed, 12 Mar 2003 19:11:04 -0500


Here's an example of the email he's trying to relay through:

The key information isn't in the headers in this case -- it's in the IMail 
SMTP log file.  Most importantly are the RCPT TO: lines, which will show 
who the E-mail was actually addressed to, and whether or not some hack was 
used to relay the E-mail.  If you post the IMail SMTP log file entries, I 
should be able to let you know what is going on.
  -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for Viruses and Spam by Richmond.com]


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whats up with blars.org?

2003-03-12 Thread Glenn \\ WCNet



SpamCop is just as bad. We run a web server 
for an associate who lives in another city. One of his customers has some 
java scripts ona site for free download. A spammer in Taiwan has 
added one of those scripts into the html on his advertisement. The script 
includes a reference to the download site and the name of the author of the 
script. SpamCop picks up on that, traces the IP of that web site to us, 
and sends a complaint about a "spamvertised" site. The URL for the 
so-called "spamvertised" site does not appear anywhere in the viewable content 
of the html advertisement -- it can only be seen by viewing the source code of 
the page. The headers of the reported spam indicate quite clearly that the 
message originated from elsewhere.

Glenn Z.


  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Sheldon 
  Koehler 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 6:12 
  PM
  Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Whats up with 
  blars.org?
  This is from their web page:"In general, an entire 
  netblock is added rather than just a single IP orcustomer of a larger ISP. 
  (For example, if hugeisp has a /16 that theyallocate a single /24 to 
  spamcustomer, the /16 will be listed rather thanjust the /24.) An entire 
  ISP may be added if they show a pattern ofrejecting valid spam complaints 
  for invalid reasons."Our local hospital just contacted me (they are 
  not a customer, but I knowtheir IT guy) that they were blocked by 
  blars.org. They could not even getto their web page! It seems they are an 
  innocent victim of the above policyof blocking the whole /16. I would urge 
  anyone using this BL to stop usingit as this gives blocking it's 
  undeserved bad reputation.Now to see if I can help our hospital 
  out...SheldonSheldon Koehler, 
  Owner/Partner http://www.tenforward.comTen Forward 
  Communications 
  360-457-9023Nationwide access, neighborhood support!"Whenever you 
  find yourself on the side of the majority, it's timeto pause and reflect." 
  Mark Twain---[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude 
  Virus (http://www.declude.com)]---This 
  E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, 
  just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype 
  "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How did this Spammer get through?

2003-03-12 Thread Brian Cunningham
What's strange is that the only thing consistent around all of the spam emails is the 
IP address 169.207.38.237, which is listed with SpamCop.

Should declude pick that up?  I've got spamcop listed as an automatic hold, but 
somehow he keeps getting through.

Thanks.

b


-- Original Message --
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:  Wed, 12 Mar 2003 19:11:04 -0500


Here's an example of the email he's trying to relay through:

The key information isn't in the headers in this case -- it's in the IMail 
SMTP log file.  Most importantly are the RCPT TO: lines, which will show 
who the E-mail was actually addressed to, and whether or not some hack was 
used to relay the E-mail.  If you post the IMail SMTP log file entries, I 
should be able to let you know what is going on.
  -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for Viruses and Spam by Richmond.com]


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whats up with blars.org?

2003-03-12 Thread John Tolmachoff
What do you mean they can not get to their web page? That has nothing to do
with e-mail.

John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA  92835
www.reliancesoft.com


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sheldon Koehler
 Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 4:12 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Whats up with blars.org?
 
 This is from their web page:
 
 In general, an entire netblock is added rather than just a single IP or
 customer of a larger ISP. (For example, if hugeisp has a /16 that they
 allocate a single /24 to spamcustomer, the /16 will be listed rather than
 just the /24.) An entire ISP may be added if they show a pattern of
 rejecting valid spam complaints for invalid reasons.
 
 Our local hospital just contacted me (they are not a customer, but I know
 their IT guy) that they were blocked by blars.org. They could not even get
 to their web page! It seems they are an innocent victim of the above
policy
 of blocking the whole /16. I would urge anyone using this BL to stop using
 it as this gives blocking it's undeserved bad reputation.
 
 Now to see if I can help our hospital out...
 
 Sheldon
 
 
 Sheldon Koehler, Owner/Partnerhttp://www.tenforward.com
 Ten Forward Communications   360-457-9023
 Nationwide access, neighborhood support!
 
 Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time
 to pause and reflect. Mark Twain
 
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whats up with blars.org?

2003-03-12 Thread Sheldon Koehler
 What do you mean they can not get to their web page? That has nothing to
do
with e-mail.

Apparently blars blocks everything at their router, probably a Linux router.
From the hospital, they cannot even browse to the web page. I find it rather
bizarre myself, but the IT guy is a friend and I have known him for 13
years. So I believe him when he says it...

Sheldon


Sheldon Koehler, Owner/Partnerhttp://www.tenforward.com
Ten Forward Communications   360-457-9023
Nationwide access, neighborhood support!

Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time
to pause and reflect. Mark Twain


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HELO contains

2003-03-12 Thread Bill B.
Scott,

We are seeing a case where the mail server will connect to itself.  Check out the DNS 
for this spammer's domain:  hotoptions.net

It has no MX record, but an A record pointing to: 127.0.0.1

If an email from this domain is bounced due to a full mailbox, this will cause Imail 
to attempt to deliver the email to 127.0.0.1 which causes a mail loop.  After 5 loops 
Imail kills it.

Is there a Declude test we can use to block these based on the MX/A that the domain 
name resolves to?

If not, perhaps the MAILFROM test could be modified to count this as a bad domain.

Bill



-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 18:17:33 -0500
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HELO contains



SOO..  My question is this.. Could I create a wordfilter rule that
goes like
HELO 10 CONTAINS imail.fament.com
or will that shoot myself in the foot for some reason ?

That will work fine, just so long as you don't have any other mailservers 
that identify themselves as imail.fament.com.  If your IMail server is 
the only one that does, the filter will work fine.

If it really is the HELO string then I don't see this as a problem
since my understanding is that my mail server do NOT connect to itself
and should then never send the helo imail.fament.com to itself ?!

Correct.  There might be odd cases where the IMail server would connect to 
itself, but if that happens, you've got another problem on your hands (as 
it would cause a mail loop).
 -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer

2003-03-12 Thread Bill B.
Ron,

We use sniffer as a weighted test, giving it a weight of 12 and tagging emails as spam 
at 15.  Some false positives do occur just like with any other spam test...However, 
using it as a heavily weighted test has been extremely effective for us, while keeping 
false positives to a minimum.

I highly recommend purchasing sniffer.

Bill


-Original Message-
From: Ron Harris
Sent: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 23:16:34 -0700
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer


We have been testing the evaluation copy of SortMonsters Message Sniffer and
I would like some opinions from people in this forum.

I am considering purchasing the product if I can set it up per domain (we
use JunkMail Pro) and not spend much time sifting through e-mail to make
sure it does not catch false positives.

Is Message Sniffer reliable at catching only spam and not legitimate e-mail?
Our eval copy of Message Sniffer has treated many legitimate e-mail as spam,
particularly messages from the Declude forum, the Nanog forum and an
Exchange forum.

I am very interested in learning your opinions.

Ron

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.