[Declude.JunkMail] Picking up just User Name in email?

2003-08-19 Thread Kami Razvan
Title: Message



Hi:

Is there a filter 
that can only pickup the UserID rather than theentire 
Mailfrom?


[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

we are seeing a 
lot of spam from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it would be good to be able to have a filter 
like:

USERIDIS 
*

Regards,
Kami







RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Picking up just User Name in email?

2003-08-19 Thread George Kulman
Title: Message



Kami,

Why 
not

MAILFROM0STARTSWITH*@

George


-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Kami RazvanSent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 7:34 
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: 
[Declude.JunkMail] Picking up just User Name in email?

  Hi:
  
  Is there a 
  filter that can only pickup the UserID rather than theentire 
  Mailfrom?
  
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  we are seeing a 
  lot of spam from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it would be good to be able to have a filter 
  like:
  
  USERIDIS 
  *
  
  Regards,
  Kami
  
  
  
  
  


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Picking up just User Name in email?

2003-08-19 Thread Kami Razvan
Title: Message



that is a good 
idea...

It would do 
exactly as I wanted...

How come I did not 
think of that? :) .. It has to be Monday again?

Regards,
Kami

-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of George KulmanSent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 7:53 
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: 
[Declude.JunkMail] Picking up just User Name in email?
Kami,

Why 
not

MAILFROM0STARTSWITH*@

George


-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Kami RazvanSent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 7:34 
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: 
[Declude.JunkMail] Picking up just User Name in email?

  Hi:
  
  Is there a 
  filter that can only pickup the UserID rather than theentire 
  Mailfrom?
  
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  we are seeing a 
  lot of spam from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it would be good to be able to have a filter 
  like:
  
  USERIDIS 
  *
  
  Regards,
  Kami
  
  
  
  
  


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Picking up just User Name in email?

2003-08-19 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Title: Message









Kami, you have already used up your
quota of Mondays for the month of August. One more, and you get 50 lashes with
a wet noodle.







John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA

Engineer/Consultant

eServices For You

www.eservicesforyou.com









-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kami Razvan
Sent: Tuesday, August
 19, 2003 5:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
Picking up just User Name in email?





that is a good idea...











It would do exactly as I wanted...











How come I did not think of that? :) .. It has
to be Monday again?











Regards,





Kami



-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Kulman
Sent: Tuesday, August
 19, 2003 7:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
Picking up just User Name in email?



Kami,











Why not











MAILFROM0STARTSWITH*@











George











-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kami Razvan
Sent: Tuesday, August
 19, 2003 7:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]
Picking up just User Name in email?







Hi:











Is there a filter that can only pickup the UserID rather
than theentire Mailfrom?













[EMAIL PROTECTED]





[EMAIL PROTECTED]













we are seeing a lot of spam from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it would be
good to be able to have a filter like:











USERIDIS *











Regards,





Kami












































RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Picking up just User Name in email?

2003-08-19 Thread Sean Fahey
Title: Message



Better 
than awet patch cord I guess. Ow, that almost hurts just thinking about 
it.

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff 
  (Lists)Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 8:53 AMTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Picking 
  up just User Name in email?
  
  Kami, you have 
  already used up your quota of Mondays for the month of August. One more, and 
  you get 50 lashes with a wet noodle.
  
  
  
  John Tolmachoff MCSE 
  CSSA
  Engineer/Consultant
  eServices For You
  www.eservicesforyou.com
  


[Declude.JunkMail] Blocking attachments

2003-08-19 Thread IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge)
Just double checking, but we do NOT have a way to block specific
attachments in Declude JM Pro, correct ?


Karl Drugge, Systems Network Engineer
 
 
 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blocking attachments

2003-08-19 Thread brian


Here's 2...

MESSAGE.ZIP

YOUR_DETAILS.ZIP

Although they are really viruses.
 
On 8/19/2003 12:30pm you wrote...

Just double checking, but we do NOT have a way to block specific
attachments in Declude JM Pro, correct ?

Correct (because we're not yet aware of spammers that are attaching files 
that should be blocked).

-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you have been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] sure to be silly question

2003-08-19 Thread Tandem Group
Here's what I did with the comments: I created the following tests

COMMENTS20  comments20  x   10  0
COMMENTS40  comments40  x   10  0
COMMENTS60  comments60  x   10  0
COMMENTS80  comments80  x   10  0
COMMENTS100 comments100 x   10  0
COMMENTS120 comments120 x   10  0

This allows me to increment the penalty by the number of comments in a
message. For each of 20 comments, a cumulative weight of 10 is added.

Seems to work.

Erik

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of paul
 Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 11:04
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] sure to be silly question


 Ok, I've got a question about the COMMENTS test. Since I have
 a copy of
 every email I've gotten from this and the AV list since I
 joined, I looked
 through them and didn't see my answer. I also looked at the
 JM revisions
 page and found nothing either, so here goes. Below is the
 line from the
 message source of an email I got this morning. VERY bad idea
 to spam the
 guy in charge of email. =)  anyway, since the words gen*eric
 via*gra minus
 the *s in case of filters, are shoen in the email, but
 seperated by the junk
 in the . What's the way to set a block/test for this? I've
 yet to use the
 COMMENTS test, but want to know the BEST way to do so.

 Geinput type=hidden name=zZKIrRcpWfFgeyDneric Vip
 style=margin-bottom: -20font size=1
 color=#FFxvtAXyZLNqZbKsaWiqfpg/font/pagra

 Any help is appreciated!

 Paul


 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] sure to be silly question

2003-08-19 Thread paul
Ok, I've got a question about the COMMENTS test. Since I have a copy of
every email I've gotten from this and the AV list since I joined, I looked
through them and didn't see my answer. I also looked at the JM revisions
page and found nothing either, so here goes. Below is the line from the
message source of an email I got this morning. VERY bad idea to spam the
guy in charge of email. =)  anyway, since the words gen*eric via*gra minus
the *s in case of filters, are shoen in the email, but seperated by the junk
in the . What's the way to set a block/test for this? I've yet to use the
COMMENTS test, but want to know the BEST way to do so.

Geinput type=hidden name=zZKIrRcpWfFgeyDneric Vip
style=margin-bottom: -20font size=1
color=#FFxvtAXyZLNqZbKsaWiqfpg/font/pagra

Any help is appreciated!

Paul


---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New variation of PayPal Account retrieval

2003-08-19 Thread Jeff Kratka
May be a dumb question but how are you setting up JM to block these.

Jeff

 **
TymeWyse Internet
P.O.Box 84 - 583 N. Main St., Canyonville, OR 97417
tel/fax: (541) 839-6027  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kami Razvan
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2003 10:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] New variation of PayPal Account retrieval


Hi;

A new variation of the PayPal fraud is going on.. I just got this email in
our spam filter... it is asking for Citibank checking account...

I just thought it would be good for all to see this... in case you don't
catch it..

Regards,
Kami



Here is the header:
=
Received: from cgocable.net [24.150.152.123] by foroosh.com
  (SMTPD32-8.02) id AC6E4C0136; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 12:31:42 -0400
Received: from d150-152-123.home.cgocable.net
(d150-152-123.home.cgocable.net [24.150.152.123])
by cgocable.net (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id aoelr258507
for deleted; Sun, 17 Aug 2003 01:34:12 -0400 (EST)
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 01:34:10 -0400 (EST)
From: Citibank [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.61) Personal
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: deleted
Subject: [58~]Your Checking Account at Citibank.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=--3309750874624
X-IMAIL-SPAM-VALFROM: (4981046)
X-RBL-Warning: NOABUSE: Not supporting [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-RBL-Warning: IPNOTINMX:
X-RBL-Warning: NOLEGITCONTENT: No content unique to legitimate E-mail
detected.
X-RBL-Warning: BASE64: A binary encoded text or HTML section was found in
this E-mail.
X-RBL-Warning: FILTER-HEADER-XMAIL: Message failed FILTER-HEADER-XMAIL test
(59)
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMDOMAINS: Spamdomain 'juno.com' found: Address of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent from invalid d150-152-123.home.cgocable.net.
X-RBL-Warning: COUNTRY: Message failed COUNTRY test (36)
X-RBL-Warning: FREEEMAILS:
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [24.150.152.123]
X-Declude-Spoolname: D5c6e004c01364150.SMD
X-Note: This E-mail was scanned  filtered by Declude [1.75i2] for SPAM 
virus.
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: NOABUSE, IPNOTINMX, NOLEGITCONTENT, BASE64,
FILTER-HEADER-XMAIL, SPAMDOMAINS, COUNTRY, WEIGHT20s, WEIGHT20r, FREEEMAILS
X-Weight: 58
X-Mailfrom: Fwpreg_Warden.juno.com
X-Note: Sent from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Note: Sent from Reverse DNS:  d150-152-123.home.cgocable.net
([24.150.152.123]).
X-Hello: cgocable.net
X-Note: Recipient(s):  deleted
X-Country-Chain: CANADA-destination
X-RCPT-TO: deleted
Status: U
X-UIDL: 331466365








Dear Citibank customer,

We are letting you know, that you, as a Citibank checking account holder,
must become acquainted with our new Terms  Conditions and agree to it.
Please, carefully read all the parts of our new Terms  Conditions and post
your consent.
Otherwise, we will have to suspend your Citibank checking account.
This measure is to prevent misunderstanding between us and our valued
customers.
We are sorry for any inconvinience it may cause.

Click here to access our Terms  Conditions page and not allow your Citibank
checking account suspension.










 2003 Citibank. Citibank (West), FSB. Member FDIC. Citibank with Arc Design
is a registered service mark of Citicorp.

Citi.com
Citigroup Privacy Promise
Terms  Conditions
Copyright  2003 Citicorp



ECRM_CBNA_NEW_ACTIVE

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New variation of PayPal Account retrieval

2003-08-19 Thread Kami Razvan
Hi;

I have setup:

BODY20   Contains211.155.234.84

That is the IP address used in the email we received.  We hold on 20

This was just made the news...

Citigroup Is Latest Victim Of Phishing Expedition Aug. 19, 2003   
The financial company's logo is the latest to be stolen by Internet scammers
who are trying to steal information from consumers.

http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=DTWA2ROB2M
VLIQSNDBGCKHSCJUMEKJVN?articleID=13100615

It is the top story at InformationWeek.. 

We have not received anymore of the spam or may be we have and it was
deleted due to its high weight.

For now that is the only filter we have for this.. Others might have seen
more signatures..

Regards,
Kami

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Kratka
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 1:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New variation of PayPal Account retrieval


May be a dumb question but how are you setting up JM to block these.

Jeff

 **
TymeWyse Internet
P.O.Box 84 - 583 N. Main St., Canyonville, OR 97417
tel/fax: (541) 839-6027  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kami Razvan
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2003 10:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] New variation of PayPal Account retrieval


Hi;

A new variation of the PayPal fraud is going on.. I just got this email in
our spam filter... it is asking for Citibank checking account...

I just thought it would be good for all to see this... in case you don't
catch it..

Regards,
Kami



Here is the header: =
Received: from cgocable.net [24.150.152.123] by foroosh.com
  (SMTPD32-8.02) id AC6E4C0136; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 12:31:42 -0400
Received: from d150-152-123.home.cgocable.net
(d150-152-123.home.cgocable.net [24.150.152.123])
by cgocable.net (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id aoelr258507
for deleted; Sun, 17 Aug 2003 01:34:12 -0400 (EST)
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 01:34:10 -0400 (EST)
From: Citibank [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.61) Personal
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: deleted
Subject: [58~]Your Checking Account at Citibank.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=--3309750874624
X-IMAIL-SPAM-VALFROM: (4981046)
X-RBL-Warning: NOABUSE: Not supporting [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-RBL-Warning: IPNOTINMX:
X-RBL-Warning: NOLEGITCONTENT: No content unique to legitimate E-mail
detected.
X-RBL-Warning: BASE64: A binary encoded text or HTML section was found in
this E-mail.
X-RBL-Warning: FILTER-HEADER-XMAIL: Message failed FILTER-HEADER-XMAIL test
(59)
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMDOMAINS: Spamdomain 'juno.com' found: Address of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent from invalid d150-152-123.home.cgocable.net.
X-RBL-Warning: COUNTRY: Message failed COUNTRY test (36)
X-RBL-Warning: FREEEMAILS:
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [24.150.152.123]
X-Declude-Spoolname: D5c6e004c01364150.SMD
X-Note: This E-mail was scanned  filtered by Declude [1.75i2] for SPAM 
virus.
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: NOABUSE, IPNOTINMX, NOLEGITCONTENT, BASE64,
FILTER-HEADER-XMAIL, SPAMDOMAINS, COUNTRY, WEIGHT20s, WEIGHT20r, FREEEMAILS
X-Weight: 58
X-Mailfrom: Fwpreg_Warden.juno.com
X-Note: Sent from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Note: Sent from Reverse DNS:  d150-152-123.home.cgocable.net
([24.150.152.123]).
X-Hello: cgocable.net
X-Note: Recipient(s):  deleted
X-Country-Chain: CANADA-destination
X-RCPT-TO: deleted
Status: U
X-UIDL: 331466365








Dear Citibank customer,

We are letting you know, that you, as a Citibank checking account holder,
must become acquainted with our new Terms  Conditions and agree to it.
Please, carefully read all the parts of our new Terms  Conditions and post
your consent. Otherwise, we will have to suspend your Citibank checking
account. This measure is to prevent misunderstanding between us and our
valued customers. We are sorry for any inconvinience it may cause.

Click here to access our Terms  Conditions page and not allow your Citibank
checking account suspension.










 2003 Citibank. Citibank (West), FSB. Member FDIC. Citibank with Arc Design
is a registered service mark of Citicorp.

Citi.com
Citigroup Privacy Promise
Terms  Conditions
Copyright  2003 Citicorp



ECRM_CBNA_NEW_ACTIVE

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] sure to be silly question

2003-08-19 Thread Tandem Group
That's right. Each is incremental, so if you have 75 comments it will give a
weight of 10+10+10=30

You may wish to change the weight assigned for each to suit your
circumstances. We use a weight system at approx. twice the default ones in
order to arrive at a safe delete point of 100.

Erik

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of paul
 Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 11:47
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] sure to be silly question


  Here's what I did with the comments: I created the following tests
 
  COMMENTS20 comments 20 x 10 0
  COMMENTS40 comments 40 x 10 0
  COMMENTS60 comments 60 x 10 0
  COMMENTS80 comments 80 x 10 0
  COMMENTS100 comments 100 x 10 0
  COMMENTS120 comments 120 x 10 0

 Hmmm, ok, so am I reading this right? COMMENTS20 checks for
 20 comments? if
 there are 20 comments, 10 is added to the weight, etc etc. ?

 Let me know if I'm right and I'll add them in, sounds
 promising, I think I
 may give these a HOLD action / zero weight first, to see how
 they work.

 Thanks Erik,

 Paul


 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New manuals

2003-08-19 Thread Dr Rocco DiSanto
Is the new manual baked yet ?

-Rock

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 5:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New manuals



Any progress on the new manuals? We are holding off completing a user
interface until we can go through the current JM manual, just in case there
is something new that will impact it.

We're still working on it -- it's just taking a little longer than we
thought it would.

-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you have been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] New RHSBL site

2003-08-19 Thread Bill Landry
We are evaluating this new RHSBL site that SecuritySage is hosting, and it
appears to be working well thus far.  Info can be found at:

http://www.securitysage.com/guides/postfix_uce_rhsbl.html

The entry we are using in our global.cfg file is:

SECURITYSAGE  rhsbl  blackhole.securitysage.com  127.0.0.5  2  0

Bill

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] sure to be silly question

2003-08-19 Thread Bill Landry
Another way to scale the weight of this test is to use:

COMMENTS  comments  weight  x  5 0

where the test will accumulate the total number of obfuscation comments it
finds and add 5 to that number and apply that to the weight result for the
test.  I don't see the comments test documented on the JunkMail manual site
yet, so Scott, please correct me if I am wrong.

Bill

- Original Message - 
From: Tandem Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 11:46 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] sure to be silly question


 That's right. Each is incremental, so if you have 75 comments it will give
a
 weight of 10+10+10=30

 You may wish to change the weight assigned for each to suit your
 circumstances. We use a weight system at approx. twice the default ones in
 order to arrive at a safe delete point of 100.

 Erik

  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of paul
  Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 11:47
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] sure to be silly question
 
 
   Here's what I did with the comments: I created the following tests
  
   COMMENTS20 comments 20 x 10 0
   COMMENTS40 comments 40 x 10 0
   COMMENTS60 comments 60 x 10 0
   COMMENTS80 comments 80 x 10 0
   COMMENTS100 comments 100 x 10 0
   COMMENTS120 comments 120 x 10 0
 
  Hmmm, ok, so am I reading this right? COMMENTS20 checks for
  20 comments? if
  there are 20 comments, 10 is added to the weight, etc etc. ?
 
  Let me know if I'm right and I'll add them in, sounds
  promising, I think I
  may give these a HOLD action / zero weight first, to see how
  they work.
 
  Thanks Erik,
 
  Paul
 
 
  ---
  [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
 
  ---
  [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
  (http://www.declude.com)]
 
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] sure to be silly question

2003-08-19 Thread Tandem Group
That would be cool, but wouldn't that increment from zero, so that even one
single comment would score a 6?

Erik

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Landry
 Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 12:28
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] sure to be silly question


 Another way to scale the weight of this test is to use:

 COMMENTS  comments  weight  x  5 0

 where the test will accumulate the total number of
 obfuscation comments it
 finds and add 5 to that number and apply that to the weight
 result for the
 test.  I don't see the comments test documented on the
 JunkMail manual site
 yet, so Scott, please correct me if I am wrong.

 Bill

 - Original Message -
 From: Tandem Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 11:46 AM
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] sure to be silly question


  That's right. Each is incremental, so if you have 75
 comments it will give
 a
  weight of 10+10+10=30
 
  You may wish to change the weight assigned for each to suit your
  circumstances. We use a weight system at approx. twice the
 default ones in
  order to arrive at a safe delete point of 100.
 
  Erik
 
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of paul
   Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 11:47
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] sure to be silly question
  
  
Here's what I did with the comments: I created the
 following tests
   
COMMENTS20 comments 20 x 10 0
COMMENTS40 comments 40 x 10 0
COMMENTS60 comments 60 x 10 0
COMMENTS80 comments 80 x 10 0
COMMENTS100 comments 100 x 10 0
COMMENTS120 comments 120 x 10 0
  
   Hmmm, ok, so am I reading this right? COMMENTS20 checks for
   20 comments? if
   there are 20 comments, 10 is added to the weight, etc etc. ?
  
   Let me know if I'm right and I'll add them in, sounds
   promising, I think I
   may give these a HOLD action / zero weight first, to see how
   they work.
  
   Thanks Erik,
  
   Paul
  
  
   ---
   [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
  
   ---
   [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
   (http://www.declude.com)]
  
   ---
   This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
   unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
   type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
   at http://www.mail-archive.com.
  
 
  ---
  [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]
 
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] sure to be silly question

2003-08-19 Thread paul
 Another way to scale the weight of this test is to use:

 COMMENTS  comments  weight  x  5 0

 where the test will accumulate the total number of obfuscation comments it
 finds and add 5 to that number and apply that to the weight result for the
 test.

So which is a preferrable approach? I've added the COMMENTS20,40,60,80,100
lines to Global, and WARN actions in $default$, so I'm guessing it's set
now, but if this way is easier, I'd switch. Right now no weight is added,
and just warnings are added to the headers. 80 + 100 are set to HOLD for
review.

Thanks all!

Paul


---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] sure to be silly question

2003-08-19 Thread Bill Landry
That's correct.  However, you can set the value I showed in the example as
5, to anything you want, including zero 0, which would then add a weight
exactly matching the number of obfuscated comments found in the message.

Bill
- Original Message - 
From: Tandem Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 12:52 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] sure to be silly question


 That would be cool, but wouldn't that increment from zero, so that even
one
 single comment would score a 6?

 Erik

  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Landry
  Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 12:28
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] sure to be silly question
 
 
  Another way to scale the weight of this test is to use:
 
  COMMENTS  comments  weight  x  5 0
 
  where the test will accumulate the total number of
  obfuscation comments it
  finds and add 5 to that number and apply that to the weight
  result for the
  test.  I don't see the comments test documented on the
  JunkMail manual site
  yet, so Scott, please correct me if I am wrong.
 
  Bill
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Tandem Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 11:46 AM
  Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] sure to be silly question
 
 
   That's right. Each is incremental, so if you have 75
  comments it will give
  a
   weight of 10+10+10=30
  
   You may wish to change the weight assigned for each to suit your
   circumstances. We use a weight system at approx. twice the
  default ones in
   order to arrive at a safe delete point of 100.
  
   Erik
  
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of paul
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 11:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] sure to be silly question
   
   
 Here's what I did with the comments: I created the
  following tests

 COMMENTS20 comments 20 x 10 0
 COMMENTS40 comments 40 x 10 0
 COMMENTS60 comments 60 x 10 0
 COMMENTS80 comments 80 x 10 0
 COMMENTS100 comments 100 x 10 0
 COMMENTS120 comments 120 x 10 0
   
Hmmm, ok, so am I reading this right? COMMENTS20 checks for
20 comments? if
there are 20 comments, 10 is added to the weight, etc etc. ?
   
Let me know if I'm right and I'll add them in, sounds
promising, I think I
may give these a HOLD action / zero weight first, to see how
they work.
   
Thanks Erik,
   
Paul
   
   
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
   
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
   
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
   
  
   ---
   [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
  (http://www.declude.com)]
  
   ---
   This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
   unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
   type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
   at http://www.mail-archive.com.
  
 
  ---
  [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Web based User Configurations

2003-08-19 Thread Peter Lent
Hi All,

Is there anything that will work with I-mail or stand alone that will enable
the end user to adjust their declude settings from a web based terminal?

Trying not to re-invent the wheel if I do not have to.

THANKS

Peter

-Peter Lent
Technology Services Manager
Goodwill Industries of Orange County
Shop online @ www.shopgoodwill.com
www.ocgoodwill.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
714.547.6308 x 377
714.543.4826 - Fax
714.240.4342 - Cell


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Reporting Software, script attached

2003-08-19 Thread IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge)
For anyone who wants this, here's a new script that will sort your
delude log files and gives a simple easy to read report. This ones been
cleaned up since the last one, and takes into account garbled and
corrupt log files. Much easier to use, and no file renaming required.
The only thing you have to do is edit your IP for your internal mail
server, if you want.

Written in PERL. Just put it in a directory with the log files you want
checked, and it will do the rest, assuming you have PERL installed. 

Enjoy !


Sample output below :

 Log file dates from : 08/02/2003 to 08/19/2003
 Lines Processed   : 30763
 My Mail Server IP : [X.x.x.x]
 Whitelisted from Internal Server: 2539


 CAUTION : You have 83 WARNINGS/ERRORS in your log file
 CAUTION : You have 2 corrupt lines in your log file


 Total Messages Logged   : 11715
 Unique SMTP ID's Logged : 8

* ACTIONS LOGGED  * COUNT  PERCENTAGE **

  White Listed:  339028.9
  WEIGHT10:  473440.4
  WEIGHT20:   5734.9
  WEIGHT202   :   5734.9
  WEIGHT40:  298625.5

* TESTS LOGGED  *** COUNT  PERCENTAGE **

  BADHEADERS  :  1987 17.0
  BASE64  :   119 1.0
  BLACKLIST   :   493 4.2
  FILTERWORDS :  3794 32.4
  HELOBOGUS   :  2718 23.2
  IPBlacklist :   283 2.4
  KILLERWORDS :   445 3.8
  MAILFROM:44 0.4
  NOABUSE :  1183 10.1
  NOPOSTMASTER:  1074 9.2
  REVDNS  :   675 5.8
  REVDNSPROBLEM   :  1630 13.9
  ROUTING :   144 1.2
  SPAMCOP :   493 4.2
  SPAMHEADERS :  2214 18.9
  VirusKill   :  1125 9.6


**






declog3.pl
Description: declog3.pl


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New RHSBL site - UPDATE

2003-08-19 Thread Bill Landry
Even though the replies come back with 127.0.0.5, I had to change my
global.cfg entry to:

SECURITYSAGE  rhsbl  blackhole.securitysage.com  *  2  0

in order for it to work correctly.

Bill

- Original Message - 
From: Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 12:16 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] New RHSBL site


 We are evaluating this new RHSBL site that SecuritySage is hosting, and it
 appears to be working well thus far.  Info can be found at:

 http://www.securitysage.com/guides/postfix_uce_rhsbl.html

 The entry we are using in our global.cfg file is:

 SECURITYSAGE  rhsbl  blackhole.securitysage.com  127.0.0.5  2  0

 Bill

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Web based User Configurations

2003-08-19 Thread Sanford Whiteman
 Is  there  anything  that  will work with I-mail or stand alone that
 will enable the end user to adjust their declude settings from a web
 based terminal?

It  can  be built using the IMail Web Messaging interface, but I don't
think  anybody's  come up with a one-size solution yet. A rather wordy
sample   is   at  http://webmail.cypressintegrated.com:8383.  See  the
SPAManager Settings areas.

Username: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Password: blue

-Sandy



Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Web based User Configurations

2003-08-19 Thread Tandem Group
We have just put our own web interface on-line. Have a look at
https://ss.alberni.net/spamcontrol/Login.asp

The userid is 'declude' and the password is 'junkmail'. I'll leave that
address up for a couple of days but don't nobody start spamming from it.
:-)

We have also written a management module which allows us to do per domain
configurations for our domain customers. We sell per address service at
$2.29 Cdn., and a per domain bundle including junkmail, virus and webmail
for $9.95 per month for up to 20 addresses.

Have just started this week, so don't know yet where that is going.


Erik

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Peter Lent
 Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 15:18
 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Web based User Configurations


 Hi All,

 Is there anything that will work with I-mail or stand alone
 that will enable
 the end user to adjust their declude settings from a web
 based terminal?

 Trying not to re-invent the wheel if I do not have to.

 THANKS

 Peter

 -Peter Lent
 Technology Services Manager
 Goodwill Industries of Orange County
 Shop online @ www.shopgoodwill.com
 www.ocgoodwill.org
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 714.547.6308 x 377
 714.543.4826 - Fax
 714.240.4342 - Cell
 

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Alligate

2003-08-19 Thread Keith Johnson
Does anyone have any configs they are willing to share that they are using in 
production for Alligate with Declude?  Thanks for the aid.
 
Keith
áŠÁj)pjËjyÞuú+¾*î±ëÈ7œ–ç^V*î²m§ÿðÃ^r[yÊN¬f¢•yúèšØ^
ç%¹ºyj)fj)bž b²Ôèº{.nÇ+‰·£ºËlzwZœIšŠ[hŠf¢–Êïuç%¹¢f§vzé®Þ
ç%¹ºyj)S…æ«r¯zǝ·Ÿ¢éÝjØm¶ŸÿÃj)Z­Èb½ç(

[Declude.JunkMail] Segregating spam by weight

2003-08-19 Thread Todd - Smart Mail



 I know there were some posts 
about this a while back but I cannot find what I am looking for now in my 
Declude mailbox.

 We hold all spam, delete 
nothing. Spam is held in the D:\IMail\spool\spam dir and we use Mail 
Review to go though looking for FPs. I would like to hold higher weighted 
spam in the D:\IMail\spool\spam\Hold instead, giving us fewer emails to review 
as FPs.

 Anyone doing this?

Thanks

Todd Hunter 



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Alligate

2003-08-19 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Do you mean as a Declude ONLY test?

John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
 Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 7:18 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Alligate
 
 Does anyone have any configs they are willing to share that they are using in
 production for Alligate with Declude?  Thanks for the aid.
 
 Keith
 NyuujjrxNrzujryjmrxjqy
#Alligate for IMail CONFIGURATION FILE (MINIMUM CONFIGURATION)
#PLEASE SEE THE CONFIGURATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR MORE OPTIONS

#GENERAL NOTES
# A # symbol or // symbol at the beginning of the line indicates a
#comment, or when preceeding a configuration value, will undefine that 
#value.


# THE FOLLOWING 2 VALUES MUST BE PROVIDED FOR ALL VERSIONS

LICENSE x

KEY xx

# THE FOLLOWING 2 VALUES NEED REFLECT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESSES
# THE POSTMASTER SHOULD BE A NEW, DEDICATED ACCOUNT FOR
# SPAM HANDLING ONLY.

POSTMASTER  
REPORTSTO   x

# THE FOLLOWING VALUE NEEDS TO BE USED IF YOU ARE USING Alligate
# WITH IMail ALONE, OR WITH IMail and Declude Virus.

#HANDOFFc:\imail\smtp32.exe

# IF YOUR ARE USING Declude Junkmail, !!DELETE THE LINE ABOVE!!
# AND RUN AlligateAS A Declude TEST.


# DECLUDE SPECIFIC OPTIONS WHEN RUNNING AlligateAS
# A DECLUDE TEST ONLY

DECLUDETESTONLY TRUE

SPAMMESSAGE NONE

ADULTMESSAGENONE


# THE FOLLOWING 4 KEYS NEED TO BE EDITED TO REFLECT YOUR
# PREFERENCES **ONLY** IF YOU ROUTE FAILED MESSAGES
# TO A PARTICULAR ADDRESS FOR REVIEW

#ROUTESPAM  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

#ROUTESPAMSCORE 40

#ROUTEADULT [EMAIL PROTECTED]

#ROUTEADULTSCORE40


# IF NOT RUNNING AS A DECLUDE TEST ONLY THEN THE FOLLOWING
# 2 VALUES SHOULD BE USED

#SPAMMESSAGEDEFAULT

#ADULTMESSAGE   DEFAULT


# IF YOU WANT THE RECIPIENT OF OUTGOING MAIL TO BE ADDED TO THE
# USERS WHITELIST AUTOMATICALLY, CHANGE THE NEXT VALUE TO TRUE

AUTOWHITELIST   FALSE


# THE FOLLOWING 2 VALUES DEFINE WHETHER OR NOT TO SCAN OUTGOING
# MAIL AND WILL CAUSE A REJECTION MESSAGE TO BE SENT TO YOUR
# USER IF THE OUTGOING MESSAGE FAILS

SCANOUTGOINGTRUE

SENDREJECTION   FALSE


# THE BALANCE OF THESE VALUES ARE RECOMMENDED DEFAULTS AND 
# NEED NOT BE CHANGED REGARDLESS OF THE OPTIONS ABOVE

SENDTOTRASH FALSE

ALLOWRELAY  TRUE

NONENGLISH  6

BADROUTING  12

THRESHOLD   4

PATMATCHES  2

SATURATION  5

LOGALLFAILURES  TRUE

ADULTSCORE  18

#ADULTKILLSCORE 45

SPAMSCORE   18

#SPAMKILLSCORE  65

EXITCODESCORE   22

#KILLSCORE  75

#ADULTSUBJECT   [ADULT]

#SPAMSUBJECT[SPAM]

LOGDETAIL   DEBUG

MAXSUBJECTSCORE 10

GOODSPAMMER 6

KNOWNSPAMMER8

HIGHASCII   5

SIGNATURE   4

DOHOSTLOOKUPTRUE

REPEATIP4

REPEATHOST  4

CHECKREPEATSPAMMERS TRUE

MAXREPEATSPAMMERS   500

TRASHBADENCODINGFALSE

REPEATSPAMSCORE 30

REPEATADULTSCORE30

LOGFILEPATH E:\Alligate