Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible Missing JM Log lines in 1.75

2004-03-01 Thread R. Scott Perry

I am still see lots of these in my logs (v1.78i4):
=
02/29/2004 02:35:34 Qc0656280009442df Unknown Var: %TESTNAMEX-RBL-Warni
X-RBL-Warning: %TESTNAMEX-RBL-
Could you E-mail me one of your log files (off-list), so that I can check 
it out in more detail?  The latest interim has some extra code to help 
determine where the problem is.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Gateway Mailservers and IPBypass

2004-03-01 Thread Russ Uhte (Lists)
I've setup a gateway mailserver using postfix and amavisd.  I want to make 
sure that the IP for this gateway server is skipped, but I'm kinda confused 
since the postfix box hands off the message a few times.  Below are the 
received headers from one of the messages, and also what I put in my 
global.cfg.  Does this all look okay?  It seems to be working, but I want 
to check.

Thanks,
Russ
Received: from mx2.parallax.ws [12.161.104.8] by mail.parallax.ws with ESMTP
  (SMTPD32-8.05) id A0D5F731012C; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 08:55:33 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost.parallax.ws [127.0.0.1])
by mx2.parallax.ws (Postfix) with ESMTP id C12635A21
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon,  1 Mar 2004 08:55:33 -0500 
(EST)
Received: from mx2.parallax.ws ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mx2.parallax.ws [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 10949-06 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 Mon,  1 Mar 2004 08:55:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from hotmail.com (bay14-f5.bay14.hotmail.com [64.4.49.5])
by mx2.parallax.ws (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C73F5A1F
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon,  1 Mar 2004 08:55:33 -0500 
(EST)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
 Mon, 1 Mar 2004 05:55:32 -0800
Received: from 12.161.104.23 by by14fd.bay14.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
Mon, 01 Mar 2004 13:55:32 GMT

IPBYPASS12.161.104.8
IPBYPASS127.0.0.1


---
Russ Uhte, CCNA, MCP, A+
Network Administrator
Richmond Power  Light
Parallax Systems Division
2000 US 27 South
Richmond, IN 47374
USA
Richmond: 765.973.7348
Toll-free: 888.962.3770
Cell: 765.993.3944  

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Gateway Mailservers and IPBypass

2004-03-01 Thread R. Scott Perry

I've setup a gateway mailserver using postfix and amavisd.  I want to make 
sure that the IP for this gateway server is skipped, but I'm kinda 
confused since the postfix box hands off the message a few times.  Below 
are the received headers from one of the messages, and also what I put in 
my global.cfg.  Does this all look okay?  It seems to be working, but I 
want to check.
In this case:

Received: from mx2.parallax.ws [12.161.104.8] by mail.parallax.ws with ESMTP
  (SMTPD32-8.05) id A0D5F731012C; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 08:55:33 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost.parallax.ws [127.0.0.1])
by mx2.parallax.ws (Postfix) with ESMTP id C12635A21
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon,  1 Mar 2004 08:55:33 -0500 
(EST)
Received: from mx2.parallax.ws ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mx2.parallax.ws [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 10949-06 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 Mon,  1 Mar 2004 08:55:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from hotmail.com (bay14-f5.bay14.hotmail.com [64.4.49.5])
by mx2.parallax.ws (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C73F5A1F
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon,  1 Mar 2004 08:55:33 -0500 
(EST)
The actual IP is 64.4.49.5.  The IPs in Received: headers before that are 
12.161.104.8 and 127.0.0.1.  In this case, I would recommend using HOP 0, 
IPBYPASS 12.161.104.8, and IPBYPASS 127.0.0.1.  So:

IPBYPASS12.161.104.8
IPBYPASS127.0.0.1
This is exactly what I would use (assuming you are using the default HOP 0).

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Gateway Mailservers and IPBypass

2004-03-01 Thread Russ Uhte (Lists)
At 09:09 AM 3/1/2004, R. Scott Perry wrote:

I've setup a gateway mailserver using postfix and amavisd.  I want to 
make sure that the IP for this gateway server is skipped, but I'm kinda 
confused since the postfix box hands off the message a few times.  Below 
are the received headers from one of the messages, and also what I put in 
my global.cfg.  Does this all look okay?  It seems to be working, but I 
want to check.
In this case:

Received: from mx2.parallax.ws [12.161.104.8] by mail.parallax.ws with ESMTP
  (SMTPD32-8.05) id A0D5F731012C; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 08:55:33 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost.parallax.ws [127.0.0.1])
by mx2.parallax.ws (Postfix) with ESMTP id C12635A21
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon,  1 Mar 2004 08:55:33 
-0500 (EST)
Received: from mx2.parallax.ws ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mx2.parallax.ws [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 10949-06 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 Mon,  1 Mar 2004 08:55:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from hotmail.com (bay14-f5.bay14.hotmail.com [64.4.49.5])
by mx2.parallax.ws (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C73F5A1F
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon,  1 Mar 2004 08:55:33 
-0500 (EST)
The actual IP is 64.4.49.5.  The IPs in Received: headers before that are 
12.161.104.8 and 127.0.0.1.  In this case, I would recommend using HOP 
0, IPBYPASS 12.161.104.8, and IPBYPASS 127.0.0.1.  So:

IPBYPASS12.161.104.8
IPBYPASS127.0.0.1
This is exactly what I would use (assuming you are using the default HOP 0).
That I am!!  Thanks a million.

-Russ 

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT - Windows gone crazy

2004-03-01 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Have you tried an on-line virus scan?

John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerod Bennett
 Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 11:16 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT - Windows gone crazy
 
 Hello everyone,
 
 I've been trying to solve this problem for the better part of a week and
 searching the internet has just not helped.
 
 I'm running a windows xp pro machine and the context menus for windows
 have
 become very terse.
 For example if I right-click on the Recycle Bin, I get this menu:
 Create Shortcut
 --
 Properties
 
 As you can see the normal Empty the recycle bin option is missing.
 
 This is a fairly consistent problem for all OS interaction, .inf files
 don't
 give you the option to install, My Computer doesn't list manage...
 
 If anyone has seen this or knows of a place that might have a solution,
 I'd
 really appreciate it.
 
 Thanks,
 -Jerod
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Message failed SORBS-DUHL test but lookup reveals no block

2004-03-01 Thread R. Scott Perry

Hi. This message failed the SORBS-DUHL test even though a lookup at SORBS 
of the IP address revealed all clean.

Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks.

Received: from mail.ittint.net [130.94.242.170] by mail.electdist.com with 
ESMTP
  (SMTPD32-8.05) id A52D91B0108; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 11:55:25 -0800
Received: from SNIP.targetelectronics.com [4.4.24.79] by mail.ittint.net 
with ESMTP
  (SMTPD32-6.06) id A524F20292; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 14:55:16 -0500
The issue here is that while 130.94.242.170 isn't listed in SORBS-DUHL, 
4.4.24.79 is.  So if you are using a HOP setting other than 0, 4.4.24.79 
gets scanned.  If you rename the test to SORBS-DUL, it will be skipped (or 
you can upgrade to the latest beta, which will skip if automatically).

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Message failed SORBS-DUHL test but lookup reveals no block

2004-03-01 Thread Rick Klinge
Resolved 130.94.242.170 to mail.ittint.net.
mail.ittint.net. has no MX records - [ittint.net has 1 MX record
mail.ittint.net.(10)]  

~Rick


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Gable
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 5:58 PM
To: Declude (E-mail 2)
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Message failed SORBS-DUHL test but lookup
reveals no block


Hi. This message failed the SORBS-DUHL test even though a lookup at SORBS of
the IP address revealed all clean. 

Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks.

-Mike

___
Virus Scanned and Filtered by http://www.FamHost.com E-Mail System.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Message failed SORBS-DUHL test but lookup reveals no block

2004-03-01 Thread Mike Gable



Hi. This message 
failed the SORBS-DUHL test even though a lookup at SORBS of the IP address 
revealed all clean. 

Any insight would be 
appreciated. Thanks.

-Mike

http://www.dnsbl.us.sorbs.net


Received: from mail.ittint.net [130.94.242.170] by 
mail.electdist.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A52D91B0108; Mon, 01 
Mar 2004 11:55:25 -0800Received: fromSNIP.targetelectronics.com [4.4.24.79] by 
mail.ittint.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.06) id A524F20292; Mon, 01 Mar 
2004 14:55:16 -0500Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]X-Sender:snip@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Unverified)X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora 
Version 5.2.0.9Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 11:55:15 -0800To: snip@electdist.comFrom:SNIP 
snip@targetelectronics.comSubject: 
RE: In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Mime-Version: 1.0Content-Type: text/plain; 
charset="us-ascii"; format=flowedX-Alligate-In: Passed - Adult: 0 (Req: 18) 
Spam: 0 (Req: 18) Tot: 0 (Req: 25)X-Alligate-Tracking: 
69B19F86F3C008B3X-Alligate-Signature: 2019072130X-Alligate-SpoolFile: 
D952d091b0108cc3c.SMDX-Alligate-Sender:snip@targetelectronics.com 
[130.94.242.170]X-RBL-Warning: GIBBERISH: Message failed GIBBERISH test 
(153)X-RBL-Warning: CONTENT: Message failed CONTENT test 
(831)X-Declude-Sender:snip@targetelectronics.com 
[130.94.242.170]X-Declude-Spoolname: 
D952d091b0108cc3c.SMDX-Spam-Tests-Failed: GIBBERISH, ANTI-GIBBERISH, 
CONTENT, nCONTENT, SORBS-DUHL, IPNOTINMX [-3]X-Country-Chain: UNITED 
STATES-destination


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Message failed SORBS-DUHL test but lookup reveals no block

2004-03-01 Thread R. Scott Perry

The issue here is that while 130.94.242.170 isn't listed in SORBS-DUHL, 
4.4.24.79 is.  So if you are using a HOP setting other than 0, 4.4.24.79 
gets scanned.  If you rename the test to SORBS-DUL, it will be skipped 
(or you can upgrade to the latest beta, which will skip if automatically).
In terms of the newest is skipping it automatically something new?  i.e. 
in the previous versions only the first hop was scanned if the test name 
contain DUL or DUHL?  Has this changed?
That hasn't changed.  Tests with DUL have automatically been skipped (for 
IPs after the first one) for several years, but DUHL was just recently 
added (since other spam databases weren't allowed to use DUL in their 
name to protect the MAPS trademark).

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Spam from mailforward.bulkregister.com

2004-03-01 Thread Matt
I've been seeing a ton of spam getting relayed by a zombie, open proxy 
or source through mailforward.bulkregister.com [65.109.255.4] for at 
least a week now.  Does anyone know what purpose this server has besides 
forwarding spam?  Any BulkRegister customers want to help by notifying 
the proper people at the company about the problem?  Search your logs, I 
guarantee you that this IP is all over the place.

Matt

--
=
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam from mailforward.bulkregister.com

2004-03-01 Thread Matt
Oh wait, I figured it out.

This server is a great IPBYPASS candidate.  It's some sort of domain 
mail forwarding that Bulk Register offers.  The sudden occurrence 
corresponded with me picking up a new client that was using this 
forwarding service.

IPBYPASS   65.109.255.4

Matt



Matt wrote:

I've been seeing a ton of spam getting relayed by a zombie, open proxy 
or source through mailforward.bulkregister.com [65.109.255.4] for at 
least a week now.  Does anyone know what purpose this server has 
besides forwarding spam?  Any BulkRegister customers want to help by 
notifying the proper people at the company about the problem?  Search 
your logs, I guarantee you that this IP is all over the place.

Matt

--
=
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.