RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer - New Engine

2006-10-30 Thread Craig Edmonds



whats the link?

I cant find it here http://kb.armresearch.com/index.php?title=Main_Page

Kindest RegardsCraig Edmonds123 
Marbella InternetW: www.123marbella.com



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Panda Consulting S.A. Luis 
Alberto ArangoSent: Monday, October 30, 2006 3:10 PMTo: 
declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer - New 
Engine



Forthose using sniffer (like me) there is 
a new engine that you can download.
It claims 
to be twice as fast. 
That should be very useful theses days where 
spam traffice have increased a lot.
 
-Luis Arango---This E-mail came 
from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail 
to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The 
archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. 

---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer - New Engine

2006-10-30 Thread Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango





Forthose using sniffer (like me) there is 
a new engine that you can download.
It claims 
to be twice as fast. 
That should be very useful theses days where 
spam traffice have increased a lot.
 
-Luis Arango

---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Processes Directive ver 4.0.8 question

2006-10-30 Thread Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango





Does the "Processes" directive still works under 
4.0.8 version? It is a directive set in the declude.cfg where you can control 
how many declude processes to run simultaneously.
Also is the "Threads" directive working in version 
4.0.8 as well?
I don't see PROCESSES in the online manual. Not in 
4.0.8 version.(Release notes say that 2.0.6 version uses it).
And I don't see THREADS in the online manual. It 
started in version 3.0.5.3 according to the release notes.
If procceses directive doesn't exist. What is the 
directive that replaces it?
The thing is that I am receiving huge amount of 
emails per day and from time to time my proc directory is backlogging email. I 
find my self with over 10K emails in the proc directory. I haven't seen that in 
a while and I used to increase the processes to empty the proc directory fast. 
But it doesn't seem to work.
I thank you in advance for the answers about the 
directives.
Regards
-Luis 
Arango

---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer - New Engine

2006-10-30 Thread William Stillwell



try here:

http://kb.armresearch.com/index.php?title=Message_Sniffer.GettingStarted.Distributions



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig EdmondsSent: 
Monday, October 30, 2006 9:21 AMTo: 
declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer - 
New EngineImportance: High

whats the link?

I cant find it here http://kb.armresearch.com/index.php?title=Main_Page

Kindest RegardsCraig Edmonds123 
Marbella InternetW: www.123marbella.com



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Panda Consulting S.A. Luis 
Alberto ArangoSent: Monday, October 30, 2006 3:10 PMTo: 
declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer - New 
Engine



Forthose using sniffer (like me) there is 
a new engine that you can download.
It claims 
to be twice as fast. 
That should be very useful theses days where 
spam traffice have increased a lot.
 
-Luis Arango---This E-mail came 
from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail 
to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The 
archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail 
came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an 
E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The 
archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. 

---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer - New Engine

2006-10-30 Thread Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango



Direct Link
http://www.armresearch.com/message-sniffer/download/sniffer-2-3.5.zip


the following is taken from their site

How do I upgrade to the latest version of Sniffer?
You can download the latest Sniffer engine from this page (see the Current 
Distribution file at the top of this page). 
Open the .zip file, and rename the executable to match your license ID and 
copy it over your current executable. 

regards


  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig EdmondsSent: 
  lunes, 30 de octubre de 2006 9:21To: 
  declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer 
  - New EngineImportance: High
  
  whats the link?
  
  I cant find it here http://kb.armresearch.com/index.php?title=Main_Page
  
  Kindest RegardsCraig 
  Edmonds123 Marbella InternetW: www.123marbella.com
  
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Panda Consulting S.A. Luis 
  Alberto ArangoSent: Monday, October 30, 2006 3:10 PMTo: 
  declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer - 
  New Engine
  
  
  
  Forthose using sniffer (like me) there 
  is a new engine that you can download.
  It 
  claims to be twice as fast. 
  That should be very useful theses days where 
  spam traffice have increased a lot.
   
  -Luis Arango---This E-mail came 
  from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail 
  to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The 
  archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This 
  E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just 
  send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe 
  Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat 
  http://www.mail-archive.com. 

---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Processes Directive ver 4.0.8 question

2006-10-30 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])



The replacement for the PROCESSES directive in the 
newer ("service") builds of Declude is THREADS (declude.cfg file). Once 
you adjust your THREADS count you will need to restart your decludeproc service 
as that file is only read on service start.

Darrell
Check 
out http://www.invariantsystems.com for 
utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, 
SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Panda 
  Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango 
  To: declude.junkmail@declude.com 
  
  Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 9:10 
  AM
  Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Processes 
  Directive ver 4.0.8 question
  
  
  
  Does the "Processes" directive still works under 
  4.0.8 version? It is a directive set in the declude.cfg where you can control 
  how many declude processes to run simultaneously.
  Also is the "Threads" directive working in version 
  4.0.8 as well?
  I don't see PROCESSES in the online manual. Not in 
  4.0.8 version.(Release notes say that 2.0.6 version uses it).
  And I don't see THREADS in the online manual. It 
  started in version 3.0.5.3 according to the release notes.
  If procceses directive doesn't exist. What is the 
  directive that replaces it?
  The thing is that I am receiving huge amount of 
  emails per day and from time to time my proc directory is backlogging email. I 
  find my self with over 10K emails in the proc directory. I haven't seen that 
  in a while and I used to increase the processes to empty the proc directory 
  fast. But it doesn't seem to work.
  I thank you in advance for the answers about the 
  directives.
  Regards
  -Luis 
  Arango---This E-mail came from 
  the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives 
  can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. 

---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Proc directory backlogging from time to time

2006-10-30 Thread Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango



From 
time to time our PROC directoryis backlogging emails.. We process about 
60K to 80 K every day. And from time to time I found between 8K to 10K in our 
PROC. It seems to be an spammer flood, but my server is not able to manage it 
fast enough to empty the directory.

We use 
Declude (version 4.3.7), sniffer latest engine, inv-urbland 
f-prot

When 
checking at the task manager I see quite a few (8 or 10) sniffer processes 
running at the same time as well as f-prot and inv-urbl processes, but not fast 
enough to empty the proc directory.

The 
PROCESSES directive seems to not work. I don't know how to speed up the 
processes unless I remove sniffer, inv-urbland f-prot.

I run 
a box with XEON Double Core 2.8 GHz, and 2.00GB of RAM running Windows 
2003 server.

I am 
running Smartermail 3.3.2439

Any 
suggestions? ideas? on how to prevent backlogging in the PROC 
directory?

Luis 
Arango

---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Processes Directive ver 4.0.8 question

2006-10-30 Thread Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango



Darrel: Thank you for your answer.

By the way the THREADS directive is not mentioned in the 
4.0.8 online manual. Could Declude update the informationof the manual and 
tell us (or just me) please, how it works, default values, etc, 
etc.

regards

 -Luis

  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell 
  ([EMAIL PROTECTED])Sent: lunes, 30 de octubre de 2006 
  11:51To: declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: Re: 
  [Declude.JunkMail] Processes Directive ver 4.0.8 question
  
  The replacement for the PROCESSES directive in 
  the newer ("service") builds of Declude is THREADS (declude.cfg file). 
  Once you adjust your THREADS count you will need to restart your decludeproc 
  service as that file is only read on service start.
  
  Darrell
  Check 
  out http://www.invariantsystems.com for 
  utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue 
  Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Panda 
Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango 
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com 

Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 9:10 
AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Processes 
Directive ver 4.0.8 question



Does the "Processes" directive still works under 
4.0.8 version? It is a directive set in the declude.cfg where you can 
control how many declude processes to run simultaneously.
Also is the "Threads" directive working in 
version 4.0.8 as well?
I don't see PROCESSES in the online manual. Not 
in 4.0.8 version.(Release notes say that 2.0.6 version uses it).
And I don't see THREADS in the online manual. It 
started in version 3.0.5.3 according to the release notes.
If procceses directive doesn't exist. What is the 
directive that replaces it?
The thing is that I am receiving huge amount of 
emails per day and from time to time my proc directory is backlogging email. 
I find my self with over 10K emails in the proc directory. I haven't seen 
that in a while and I used to increase the processes to empty the proc 
directory fast. But it doesn't seem to work.
I thank you in advance for the answers about the 
directives.
Regards
-Luis 
Arango---This E-mail came from 
the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The 
archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. 
  ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing 
  list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
  andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat 
  http://www.mail-archive.com. 

---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Proc directory backlogging from time to time

2006-10-30 Thread Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango



I will try the THREADS directive to see how it 
goes.
Luis

  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Panda Consulting S.A. Luis 
  Alberto ArangoSent: lunes, 30 de octubre de 2006 
  12:06To: declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: 
  [Declude.JunkMail] Proc directory backlogging from time to 
  time
  
  From 
  time to time our PROC directoryis backlogging emails.. We process about 
  60K to 80 K every day. And from time to time I found between 8K to 10K in our 
  PROC. It seems to be an spammer flood, but my server is not able to manage it 
  fast enough to empty the directory.
  
  We 
  use Declude (version 4.3.7), sniffer latest engine, inv-urbland 
  f-prot
  
  When 
  checking at the task manager I see quite a few (8 or 10) sniffer processes 
  running at the same time as well as f-prot and inv-urbl processes, but not 
  fast enough to empty the proc directory.
  
  The 
  PROCESSES directive seems to not work. I don't know how to speed up the 
  processes unless I remove sniffer, inv-urbland 
  f-prot.
  
  I 
  run a box with XEON Double Core 2.8 GHz, and 2.00GB of RAM running 
  Windows 2003 server.
  
  I am 
  running Smartermail 3.3.2439
  
  Any 
  suggestions? ideas? on how to prevent backlogging in the PROC 
  directory?
  
  Luis 
  Arango---This E-mail came from the 
  Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives 
  can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. 

---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Proc directory backlogging from time to time

2006-10-30 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])



Luis,

Email me offlist at support [at] 
invariantsystems.com and I will help you tweak up invURIBL and your declude 
configuration to help with this situation. You have a fast enough machine 
that should easily handle 150K+ messages a day easy. 

Darrell
Check 
out http://www.invariantsystems.com for 
utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, 
SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Panda 
  Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango 
  To: declude.junkmail@declude.com 
  
  Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:05 
  PM
  Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Proc 
  directory backlogging from time to time
  
  From 
  time to time our PROC directoryis backlogging emails.. We process about 
  60K to 80 K every day. And from time to time I found between 8K to 10K in our 
  PROC. It seems to be an spammer flood, but my server is not able to manage it 
  fast enough to empty the directory.
  
  We 
  use Declude (version 4.3.7), sniffer latest engine, inv-urbland 
  f-prot
  
  When 
  checking at the task manager I see quite a few (8 or 10) sniffer processes 
  running at the same time as well as f-prot and inv-urbl processes, but not 
  fast enough to empty the proc directory.
  
  The 
  PROCESSES directive seems to not work. I don't know how to speed up the 
  processes unless I remove sniffer, inv-urbland 
  f-prot.
  
  I 
  run a box with XEON Double Core 2.8 GHz, and 2.00GB of RAM running 
  Windows 2003 server.
  
  I am 
  running Smartermail 3.3.2439
  
  Any 
  suggestions? ideas? on how to prevent backlogging in the PROC 
  directory?
  
  Luis 
  Arango---This E-mail came from the 
  Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives 
  can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. 

---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] how do I turn of the review function

2006-10-30 Thread Heimir Eidskrem

its annoying as hell.

I do not want to check the review directory for files.





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Proc directory backlogging from time to time

2006-10-30 Thread Herb Guenther




Are you running sniffer in the persistent mode? That will lighten the
load quite a bit, we are doing 180K a day w the exact same setup you
are.

Herb

Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

  
  
  
  Luis,
  
  Email me offlist at support [at]
invariantsystems.com and I will help you tweak up invURIBL and your
declude configuration to help with this situation. You have a fast
enough machine that should easily handle 150K+ messages a day easy. 
  
  Darrell
  
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com
for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue
Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.
  
-
Original Message - 
From:
Panda
Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango 
To:
declude.junkmail@declude.com

Sent:
Monday, October 30, 2006 12:05 PM
Subject:
[Declude.JunkMail] Proc directory backlogging from time to time


From time to time our PROC directoryis
backlogging emails.. We process about 60K to 80 K every day. And from
time to time I found between 8K to 10K in our PROC. It seems to be an
spammer flood, but my server is not able to manage it fast enough to
empty the directory.

We use Declude (version 4.3.7), sniffer latest
engine, inv-urbland f-prot

When checking at the task manager I see quite a
few (8 or 10) sniffer processes running at the same time as well as
f-prot and inv-urbl processes, but not fast enough to empty the proc
directory.

The PROCESSES directive seems to not work. I
don't know how to speed up the processes unless I remove sniffer,
inv-urbland f-prot.

I run a box with XEON Double Core 2.8 GHz, and
2.00GB of RAM running Windows 2003 server.

I am running Smartermail 3.3.2439

Any suggestions? ideas? on how to prevent
backlogging in the PROC directory?

Luis Arango

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 
  
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


-- 
Herb Guenther
Lanex, LLC
www.lanex.com
(262)789-0966x102 Office
(262)780-0424 Direct


This e-mail is confidential and is for the use of the intended recipient(s)only. If you are not an intended recipient please advise us of our error by return e-mail then delete this e-mail and any attached files. You may not copy, disclose or use the contents in any way.





---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.JunkMail] how do I turn of the review function

2006-10-30 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
You can enable in the declude.cfg file

#AUTOREVIEW Email in the \review directory is automatically moved to the 
\proc directory when the service starts
# or when the proc directory is empty
#AUTOREVIEWOFF

Thats the only option I know of.

Darrell

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers.


- Original Message - 
From: Heimir Eidskrem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 4:15 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] how do I turn of the review function


its annoying as hell.

I do not want to check the review directory for files.





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Proc directory backlogging from time to time

2006-10-30 Thread Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango



Thank you both for your help and 
comments.

Yes I am running snifferin a persistent mode. It is a 
relief to hear that you are handling 180K with same setup.. 

I have found some strange issues within the server and they 
don't seem to be related to Declude, smartermail, etc. Mostly something related 
with folders, files and memory. Before I jump into conclusions I am just testing 
some things and report back to the forum.

So far after a fresh restart of the box Proc directory went 
back to normal and so far so good.

Meanwhile I will accept Darrell's offer and email him off 
the list. Thank you very muchh Darrel.

Regards

Luis



  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Herb GuentherSent: 
  lunes, 30 de octubre de 2006 16:22To: 
  declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Proc 
  directory backlogging from time to time
  Are you running sniffer in the persistent mode? That will 
  lighten the load quite a bit, we are doing 180K a day w the exact same setup 
  you are.HerbDarrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
  wrote: 
  



Luis,

Email me offlist at support [at] 
invariantsystems.com and I will help you tweak up invURIBL and your declude 
configuration to help with this situation. You have a fast enough 
machine that should easily handle 150K+ messages a day easy. 


Darrell
Check 
out http://www.invariantsystems.com 
for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue 
Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.

  - 
  Original Message - 
  From: 
  Panda 
  Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango 
  To: 
  declude.junkmail@declude.com 
  
  Sent: 
  Monday, October 30, 2006 12:05 PM
  Subject: 
  [Declude.JunkMail] Proc directory backlogging from time to time
  
  From time to time our PROC directoryis backlogging emails.. 
  We process about 60K to 80 K every day. And from time to time I found 
  between 8K to 10K in our PROC. It seems to be an spammer flood, but my 
  server is not able to manage it fast enough to empty the 
  directory.
  
  We use Declude (version 4.3.7), sniffer latest engine, 
  inv-urbland f-prot
  
  When checking at the task manager I see quite a few (8 or 10) 
  sniffer processes running at the same time as well as f-prot and inv-urbl 
  processes, but not fast enough to empty the proc 
  directory.
  
  The PROCESSES directive seems to not work. I don't know how to 
  speed up the processes unless I remove sniffer, inv-urbland 
  f-prot.
  
  I run a box with XEON Double Core 2.8 GHz, and 2.00GB of RAM 
  running Windows 2003 server.
  
  I am running Smartermail 3.3.2439
  
  Any suggestions? ideas? on how to prevent backlogging in the PROC 
  directory?
  
  Luis Arango---This E-mail came from the 
  Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype 
  "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. 
---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing 
list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype 
"unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. 
  -- 
Herb Guenther
Lanex, LLC
www.lanex.com
(262)789-0966x102 Office
(262)780-0424 Direct


This e-mail is confidential and is for the use of the intended recipient(s)only. If you are not an intended recipient please advise us of our error by return e-mail then delete this e-mail and any attached files. You may not copy, disclose or use the contents in any way.---This 
  E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just 
  send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe 
  Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat 
  http://www.mail-archive.com. 

---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.