RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Cardscan.net Opinions?

2003-11-18 Thread Craig Gittens
I use Plaxo. Wonderful little program.

Craig.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Webmaster
Oilfield Directory
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 4:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Cardscan.net Opinions?


i've gotten quite a few of these too... but from people i know that is...

- Original Message - 
From: Marc Catuogno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 11:04 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Cardscan.net Opinions?


 I'm tempted to block this as I'm not sure I like this kinda info in other
 people's hands.

 I'm updating my address book. Would you please take a moment to review
your
 contact information? Your updates help to keep me current, as well as
other
 people like me who already have your email address.

 To update your contact information, please visit the following link:
 https://www.cardscan.net

 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and

 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.








---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Updater

2003-11-14 Thread Craig Gittens
Use RunAS?

Craig.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Burzin
Sumariwalla
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 3:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Updater


Hi Markus,

I know it's not an active process issue, because I created a bogus folder
and bogus declude.exe
for DU to act upon.

That leads me to also believe its also a rights issue.  However,  I can't
figure it out.  I'm logged on
as Administrator, the DU folder and its contents owned by
Administrator.  The contents of the folder
inherit Administrator ownership, and same holds true for the bogus target
folder and executable.

Any other ideas?  Of note may be the fact that I get the update email after
downloads, but regardless of the
fact that the target updated.

Burzin

At 10:14 AM 11/13/2003, you wrote:



You've set up DU to install only release versions.
DU will do the following:

1.) Download the file
http://www.declude.com/version.txt

This file at them moment contains
-
Release: 1.75 http://www.declude.com/release/175/Declude.exe
Beta: 1.76 http://www.declude.com/release/176/Declude.exe
-

2.) Now DU will now check if there is already a downloaded release and beta
file with this versions. If not it will download this files and save them
in
the appropriate folder.

3.) Depending on what you've selected to update (release or beta) it will
look if there is a new file and if yes DU will copy this file to the
indicated Imail path.

In your case only look to the subfolder release if you delete the folder
175 and run the DU manualy it should download, save and copy release 175.

If not I can only expect that your logon account has no right to overwrite
in the imail path or that any time you've tried to overwrite this file it
was looked because a process whas active.

Markus

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Do you use ColdFusion? - Java?

2003-11-12 Thread Craig Gittens
The neat thing about Posini though is that my delivery load PrePostini was
220,000 emails AFTER Declude sorted. PostPostini it is now 35,000. Postini
stops DHA and SPAM DOS as well. They use Postfix. It really is neat and I
would prefer if I could have the staff and resources to build a redundant
infrastructure like that but I don't so we will do this for now. Perhaps
they will one day integrate it with mail suites like Imail and Brightmail
but that is the only drawback I see ATM. Maybe you should bite the bulllet
and offer the service to your customers as well. (The ROI makes sense if you
are inundated with SPAM. BW savings is a factor if your BW is expensive.)

Craig.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sheldon Koehler
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 10:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Do you use ColdFusion? - Java?


 I'd gladly pay for something that worked.

I did not expect it for free. I have the KWM price in mind as a point I
could get my partners to go for. Any higher than this and it would be a very
hard sell for me. So this means a lot of people need to be interested in it!

Our local competition uses Postini. And I have lost a few customers over to
them as people do seem to like that interface. However, I have thrown out
the security thing to muddy the waters ;-) We do not send their email
out to someone else's servers... I let them draw their own wrong
conclusions...

But if I could lighten my own load and give users an easy to use interface,
I would be extremely happy!

Sheldon


Sheldon Koehler, Owner/Partnerhttp://www.tenforward.com
Ten Forward Communications   360-457-9023
Nationwide access, neighborhood support!

Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time
to pause and reflect. Mark Twain


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer Declude logs

2003-10-24 Thread Craig Gittens
I have had to nix Sniffer. After disabling it, my processor dropped by about
25% and mail stopped being backed up in the Overflow directory. Instead of
having a constant over 100 smtp connections we now have less than 20 most of
the time. Mail is now being delivered again instantly.

I think I might test it with Postfix.

Craig.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 5:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer  Declude logs


The current version of Message Sniffer has no feature to turn off
logging.
I recommend that you schedule a task to delete/archive the log
periodically.

An interim release is in the works that will implement new logging
features. It will be a few weeks before this is available though.

Hope this helps,
_M

|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 3:49 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer  Declude logs
|
|
|Guys,
|
|Is there a way I can Sniffer to not log? I am testing the
|Sniffer2 but the log is very large.over a GB a day. I have
|been under attack for the past couple weeks and Declude spam
|log file is nearly 800MB a day with LOG_OK NONE set.
|
|
|Craig.
|

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer Declude logs

2003-10-23 Thread Craig Gittens
Guys,

Is there a way I can Sniffer to not log? I am testing the Sniffer2 but the
log is very large.over a GB a day. I have been under attack for the past
couple weeks and Declude spam log file is nearly 800MB a day with LOG_OK
NONE set.


Craig.
attachment: winmail.dat

[Declude.JunkMail] Countries test

2003-10-20 Thread Craig Gittens
Scott,

With the countries test, can it fail more that one country? If so, can you
change it so that it lists every line it failed? For example, I have the
following:

COUNTRIES   1   CONTAINS*A
COUNTRIES   1   CONTAINS*B
COUNTRIES   1   CONTAINS*E
COUNTRIES   5   CONTAINS*I
COUNTRIES   10  CONTAINS*L
COUNTRIES   10  CONTAINS*M
COUNTRIES   1   CONTAINS*P
COUNTRIES   10  CONTAINS*R
COUNTRIES   10  CONTAINSCH


So it would fail IANA reserved and then fail china and only list china in
the headers warning?


X-RBL-Warning: COUNTRIES: Message failed COUNTRIES test (234)  shouldn't
it go (8,234) ?

Craig.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration

2003-01-30 Thread Craig Gittens
Things like hotmail, yahoo and other free email services are not that good
at catching virii I have found. Also on the Island we have one other main
competitor and a few smaller ones, none of which have virus scanning or
can't get it implemented correctly. People switch ISPs looking for better
service and since we have better email service they tend to keep their email
accounts. Virus programs and their updates AND upgrades are ignored and seen
as unimportant.

Craig.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 2:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration


From your website:

Total Emails Clean  = 3,464,084
Total Emails Infected   = 19,565Inbound=9,556 / Outbound=10,009


Not bad, not bad!
but 10,000 outgoing viri ???
What are your user's doing?

We catch only around 15 viri/day found in 2,500 incoming  outgoing
messages/day (0,6%)
More then 99% of the infected messages are inbound.



Markus

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration

2003-01-24 Thread Craig Gittens



LOL My 
log level is MID and I run at 100MB a day.

Craig.

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John 
  TolmachoffSent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 6:39 PMTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Results 
  with our configuration
  
  Currently, our log 
  level is set to HIGH and run about 4.5 mg on weekdays.
  
  Once I have added 
  one more set of files, Kamis, and watch that for about a week, then I may go 
  back down to MID. I will always be at MID or above.
  
  
  John Tolmachoff 
  MCSE, CSSA
  IT Manager, Network 
  Engineer
  RelianceSoft, 
  Inc.
  Fullerton, 
  CA 
  92835
  www.reliancesoft.com
  
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  On Behalf Of Darrell 
  L.Sent: Thursday, 
  January 23, 2003 
  2:00 
  PMTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Results 
  with our configuration
  
  John,
  
  From your post I gathered that your log 
  level is atleast mid. Is this a normal configuration or just a one 
  time deal to look at the mail.
  
  Darrell
  
  
  
  Darrell LaRock
  Information Systems Analyst
  Gannett Television
  716-849-2272
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  On Behalf Of John 
  TolmachoffSent: 
  Thursday, 
  January 23, 2003 
  1:22 
  PMTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with 
  our configuration
  
  I wanted to 
  post yesterdays results of Declude Junkmail:
  
  We hold on a 
  weight of 20 and delete at 40.
  Messages held 
  are reviewed using Spam Review software.
  
  There were no 
  False Positives in the messages deleted. This was reviewed by manually going 
  through the Declude Junkmail log for all messages deleted and looking at the 
  subject line and sender and recipient.
  
  3485 messages 
  were processed by Declude Junkmail.
  
  889 were 
  deleted.
  85 were 
  held.
  Of the held, 
  16 were False Positives.
  
  Total found 
  and deleted: 958 (27.49%)
  
  Individual 
  tests like SPAMCHECK and NOXMAIL generate a number of false positives, but 
  that is what the while filters and MATCH program is for. However, those tests 
  are also responsible for the majority of the messages 
  deleted.
  
  Tests used: 
  (numbers after action is weight we use)
  
  ORDB 
   WARN 
  2
  OSDUL 
   WARN 
  2
  OSFORM 
  WARN 2
  OSLIST 
  WARN 2
  OSPROXY 
  WARN 2
  OSRELAY 
  WARN 2
  OSSMART 
  WARN 2
  OSSOFT 
   WARN 
2
  OSSRC 
   WARN 
  10
  SPAMCOP 
  WARN 12
  DSN 
   WARN 
  10
  NOABUSE 
  WARN 3
  NOPOSTMASTER 
  WARN 3
  BADHEADERS 
   WARN 
  5
  BASE64 
  WARN 12
  HELOBOGUS 
   WARN 
  3
  IPNOTINMX 
   LOG 
  0 -3
  MAILFROM 
   WARN 15
  PERCENT 
  WARN 15
  REVDNS 
  WARN 2
  ROUTING 
  WARN 10
  SPAMHEADERS 
  WARN 5
  
  ADULT1 
  WARN 50
  JUNK 
   WARN 
  30
  SPAMCHECK 
   WARN 
  Weight
  NOXSPAM1 
   WARN 
  20
  NOXSPAM2 
   WARN 
  15
  NOXSPAM3 
   WARN 
  15
  NOXADULT1 
   WARN 
  20
  NOXADULT2 
   WARN 
  15
  NOXADULT3 
   WARN 
  15
  REVIEWER1 
   
  ROUTETO 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  WHITEFILTER1 
  WARN
  WHITEFILTER2 
  WARN
  WHITEFILTER3 
  WARN
  WHITEFILTER4 
  WARN
  GRAYFILTER1 
   WARN
  GRAYFILTER2 
   WARN
  GRAYFILTER3 
   WARN
  GRAYFILTER4 
   WARN
  MATCH 
  WARN -40
  
  Kami, I have 
  not yet had time to try your lists.
  
  John Tolmachoff MCSE, 
  CSSA
  IT Manager, Network 
  Engineer
  RelianceSoft, 
  Inc.
  Fullerton, 
  CA 
  92835
  www.reliancesoft.com
  


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration

2003-01-24 Thread Craig Gittens
It's only cause we see 100,000 emails a day. About 80% fail Spamcop alone
I think. It takes 7-8 hours to run one log file so I don't do it often.
~12,000 email addresses in a single domain. I can't review email otherwise I
would be reviewing +15000 messages a day even after deletes. Read receipts
are a bane as far as I am concerned.

My setup is really bland but I think one day when I get a little time I will
try Sniffer. We are an ISP so NoXmail would seriously inconvenience the guys
who sign up for XXX mail.

Craig.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 8:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration


A very interesting argument.
Can you provide us some config-settings and effectivity stats about your
system?
We all want to have such a large large logfile.   ;-)



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Craig Gittens
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 1:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration


LOL My log level is MID and I run at 100MB a day.

Craig.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] An optional web interface for Declude JunkMail?

2002-12-17 Thread Craig Gittens
I don't mean to cross you and it is a question out of it's time seeing as
you haven't made any decisions yet but what about functionality and
extensibility of your proprietary platform? Are we in for another IWEBMSG
and are you going to hire a whole new team to support coding
features/upgrades for this? I see this as being your expense where you would
have almost none using existing free technologies such as IIS. Remember
that you are dealing with Win32 admins here and yes you can't please all the
people all the time but you can sure come close by injecting your new
project into our Win32 subset of experience. What you could do is just
forward to the list the new found bugs and patches for IIS from Microsoft
and other 3rd party security companies for those who don't keep up-to-date.
*guilty*

Craig.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 11:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] An optional web interface for Declude
JunkMail?



I agree that the flat files work well for Junkmail itself. However, a
web GUI will be very hard to do without the 'masters' kept in a database.
Without a database you'll run into file locking problems and it will be
harder to deal with single records.

That's why we try stay away from the bleeding edge technology -- there's a
reason they use the word bleeding.  It will actually be easier for us to
use a flat file than to use a database.

   use IIS (a lot of people don't want to use it, for security reasons).

This is pretty much a moot point as both IIS and Apache have the same
security risks. IIS just gets more press.

G  We won't use Apache either.

   or any special technologies (such as dot NET, ASP, CF, etc.).  We
 would need to create something
  that would work on all servers, and not have any special requirements.

That's going to be hard.

Not for us.  G

You really only have two choices that could cover most of the bases.
ASP or PHP both are available in the Win and Unix worlds. Win32 admins
will prefer ASP.

Sorry, I should have included PHP in that list (which is amazingly
flexible, BTW).  We're not talking about something the typical pre-bubble
We need to show them something to collect our $10 million funding company
would produce.  We actually wrote a web scripting language well before ASP
was available, and wrote our first web server back when people thought that
dynamic content on a web page was a web page that was updated by hand every
few hours.

If we require ASP or PHP, we're going to require something that a number of
our customers either don't have or won't have.  Many of our customers would
not even think of installing IIS or Apache on a mailserver.
 -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fromfile Status 11/12/02- Image`fx

2002-11-15 Thread Craig Gittens
I don't know what to say I'm sorry? I was just curious. I wasn't
ridiculing you or your list.

Craig.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com]On Behalf Of Tom
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 9:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fromfile Status 11/12/02- Image`fx
Importance: High


 Well I just wanted to see what the reason was. I assumed since
 all the entries have a catalogue number that the reason was
 recorded. In addition I do believe outpost does have removal
 instructions at the bottom of the emails.

Our List:

Our list is a private list, however, we do share it with the
Declude community.  Image`fx is not in the business to stop
spam, we are a local ISP/Developer not SpamCop.  We don't have
the time and/or resources to become one.  The idea behind the
list was suppose to be for all of us to share or contribute to.
Not many people have contributed to our list, but that's ok,
we don't need the extra work.  We have also indicated to those
who use the list to use it at their own risk and to consider
using it with a weight value.


IDs:

The ID's were added to work with our program ReadID to help
identify the address inside Declude's log file without using
a separate database.  The ID's contain a date and unique
number as a description.  This description only works with
Declude's fromfile not Imail's kill list.  This unique ID
will indicate to ReadID the last time of usage so it can
clean out addresses that spammers no longer use after X
number of days.

Removal:

While this may be true for most services I don't feel that
we should have to do this, we did not sign up for it, so
why the heck should we sign out from it.  Why would I or
you want to tell them that we actually exist?  Why should
I have to tell them I don't want their stupid little news
letters or pornographic garbage?  I did not ask for it in
the first place, not only that, it's MY server that they
are using to advertise from.  Well, guess what, they can
kiss my royal spam a$$.  They did not pay for my system.
I did, my blood, my sweat, my hard earned money.  What
right do they have?  A loop whole the law?  Either way
I don't care.

ok I will calm down now

The problem with those so called removal options is that
you never know what their intentions actually are.  I
did try this method and guess what, I got even MORE SPAM.
So a word to the wise, don't believe everything you see.

It's just as bad a an ANTI SPAM company sending us spam
to stop their spam, what the heck do they think they
sent us in the first place?

Best Regard,
Tom
Image`fx Productions, Inc.
Provider of ExecNet Internet Services






---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fromfile Status 11/12/02- Image`fx

2002-11-14 Thread Craig Gittens
Well I just wanted to see what the reason was. I assumed since all the
entries have a catalogue number that the reason was recorded. In addition I
do believe outpost does have removal instructions at the bottom of the
emails.

Craig.

REMOVE- If you do not wish to receive future emails at [EMAIL PROTECTED],
click this link to send a remove request email. Please be aware the removal
process may take 2-3 days to complete. (c)2002 Fry's Ou tp ost, Inc. All
rights reserved. Fry's Ou tpo st.co m is a trademark of Fry's O utp os t,
Inc. All trademarks depicted are the property of their respective holders or
owners. Fry's O ut pos t.co m disclaims liability for editorial, pictorial,
or typographical errors in this email.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com]On Behalf Of Tom
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 5:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fromfile Status 11/12/02- Image`fx



 Any particular reason you are blocking o u t p o s t.com?

Although I am blocking it, does not mean you have to.
I don't remember every reason for each site added to
the list, however, more than likely they were sending
us junk mail without permission.  If you feel that for
some reason I am wrong for placing them into the list
then I would like to here it.  I am only human and
un-like a computer I do make mistakes and unlike a
computer I try to rectify them.

Regards,
Tom
Image`fx

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



[Declude.JunkMail] Folder question

2002-11-14 Thread Craig Gittens
Scott,

Is declude supposed to use c:\imail\declude\domain.com\$default$.junkmail in
preference to c:\imail\declude\$default$.junkmail ? I have a situation where
it did but I was confused since I thought it did it the other way around.


Craig.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



[Declude.JunkMail] Lets go at this again.....

2002-11-06 Thread Craig Gittens
I have since added this line to my global.cfg:

VirusHoax   BOUNCE

It still doesn't work either for outgoing or incoming messages containing
the line in the text file. What am I doing wrong?

Craig.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com]On Behalf Of Craig Gittens
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 3:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude log test analyzer


I need a little help:

Does JM scan your own domain outgoing mail? I would like to stop the
jdbgmgr.exe hoax emails. i thought this would work but it doesn't.

I set this up:

Global.cfg:
VirusHoax   filter  c:\Imail\Declude\virhoax.txtx   0   0

$default$.junkmail:
VirusHoax   BOUNCE

virhoax.txt:
BODY 0 In the files/folders option, write the name jdbgmgr.exe

VirusHoaxbounce.eml:
From: postmaster@%LOCALHOST%
To: %MAILFROM%
Subject: Virus Hoax

Delivery Failed: %ALLRECIPS%

This is an email that contains a Virus Hoax. It was not delivered. Please
see: http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/jdbgmgr.exe.file.hoax.html

Sunbeach Postmaster.

Original message follows:

%FULLMSG%

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude log test analyzer

2002-10-25 Thread Craig Gittens
I need a little help:

Does JM scan your own domain outgoing mail? I would like to stop the
jdbgmgr.exe hoax emails. i thought this would work but it doesn't.

I set this up:

Global.cfg:
VirusHoax   filter  c:\Imail\Declude\virhoax.txtx   0   0

$default$.junkmail:
VirusHoax   BOUNCE

virhoax.txt:
BODY 0 In the files/folders option, write the name jdbgmgr.exe

VirusHoaxbounce.eml:
From: postmaster@%LOCALHOST%
To: %MAILFROM%
Subject: Virus Hoax

Delivery Failed: %ALLRECIPS%

This is an email that contains a Virus Hoax. It was not delivered. Please
see: http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/jdbgmgr.exe.file.hoax.html

Sunbeach Postmaster.

Original message follows:

%FULLMSG%

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



[Declude.JunkMail] HELOBOGUS

2002-09-17 Thread Craig Gittens

Should this not have triggered HELOBOGUS as it normally does?

Craig.

Received: from name2.sunbeach.net [205.214.199.131] by sunbeach.net with
ESMTP
(SMTPD32-6.06) id A2C44EDE0148; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 23:47:16 -0400
Received: from host242-39.pool80205.interbusiness.it
(host242-39.pool80205.interbusiness.it [80.205.39.242])
by name2.sunbeach.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id XAA05539
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 23:47:45 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Authentication-Warning: name2.sunbeach.net:
host242-39.pool80205.interbusiness.it [80.205.39.242] didn't use HELO
protocol
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sunbeach.net by 0721BV7Y63.sunbeach.net with SMTP for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 23:52:09 +0500
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 23:52:09 +0500
Subject: This will be the best email you ever read
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMCOP: Blocked - see
http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml?80.205.39.242
X-RBL-Warning: HEUR10: Heuristic spam detection level 10 [1.00]
X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT10: Weight of 11 reaches or exceeds the limit of 10.
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [80.205.39.242]
X-Declude-Spoolname: D02c4148.SMD
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: SPAMCOP, HEUR10, WEIGHT10
X-Note: Total spam weight of this E-mail is 11.
X-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-UIDL: 318915912
Status: U
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HELOBOGUS

2002-09-17 Thread Craig Gittens

I spoke in haste, that all makes sense. I am having a tough time with
spammers using the mailfrom or return address of the recipient and a wetware
problem on the customer end. Is there any way I can stop this? I know, it
seems like a catch 22.

Craig.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 8:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HELOBOGUS



Should this not have triggered HELOBOGUS as it normally does?

Received: from name2.sunbeach.net [205.214.199.131] by sunbeach.net with
ESMTP
(SMTPD32-6.06) id A2C44EDE0148; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 23:47:16 -0400

name2.sunbeach.net does have an A record, so it should not trigger the
HELOBOGUS test.

Received: from host242-39.pool80205.interbusiness.it
(host242-39.pool80205.interbusiness.it [80.205.39.242])
by name2.sunbeach.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id XAA05539
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 23:47:45 -0400

and host242-39.pool80205.interbusiness.it has an A record, as well.

X-Spam-Tests-Failed: SPAMCOP, HEUR10, WEIGHT10

So it looks like the test did work properly.  The hostname doesn't need to
have an MX record, just an A record is fine.
 -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fighting the Menace of Unwanted E-Mail

2002-09-17 Thread Craig Gittens

Sorry, just getting around to reading my 700 or so unread messages. Anyone
notice Hotmail put in a few new options a while ago and enabled them for
everyone? Click on the options link and choose Personal Profile and scoll to
the bottom. You will notice that the two options to 1) Share my email
address and 2) Share my other registration information are checked.

Craig.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 5:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Fighting the Menace of Unwanted E-Mail


By OREN ETZIONI of the NY TIMES
---

A few days ago I created a new e-mail account, and within 24 hours I had
received over 25 unsolicited commercial e-mail messages, otherwise known as
spam. Even though I'm a professor of computer science, I, like so many
others, have failed to protect myself from this daily nuisance. So I welcome
t

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



[Declude.JunkMail] OT Cold Fusion log parser

2002-07-23 Thread Craig Gittens


Anyone ever wrote a cold fusion log parser for dec.log files? I am
thinking of one that will easily search for entries like WEIGHTXX test and
return all the info for the particular Q###(or more in Imail7) file.

Craig.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



[Declude.JunkMail] Help!?

2002-07-12 Thread Craig Gittens


Can someone help me with this please? 205.214.199.131 is a sendmail machine
I have rigged to help out Imail with deliveries so it has a secondary MX.
People send mail to xxx from xxx which is obviously forged and the only
proof is the X-auth warning from my secondary MX. Can anyone see any way of
stopping this? I thought of using a filter but the filters afaik does not do
HEADERS.

Craig.

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Authentication-Warning: name2.sunbeach.net: [203.193.56.230] didn't use
HELO protocol
Importance: Normal
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 16:13:58 -0500
Subject: Beasty Babes!!
X-Encoding: MIME
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [205.214.199.131]
X-Declude-Spoolname: De62c102.SMD
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: None
X-Note: Total spam weight of this E-mail is 0.
X-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] test failure, sort of

2002-06-02 Thread Craig Gittens

Do you have qves.com whitelisted? Just checking. I notice that whitelisted
domains who fail individual tests are still noted as having a wieght but no
failed tests, however it shouldn't trigger WEIGHT15, just the variable
%Weight% isn't cleared.

Craig.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] test failure, sort of



The actual hostname of this domain is vwebs.com. I have 9 other custom
files that seem to be working as advertised (my personal is much more
strict
than the others, and changes the subject even more with test failure
listings and so forth...). So I think I am in the correct domain folder.
How
about the length of the email address? This is the only three letter one.

The length of the address shouldn't matter.

To use the debug mode, you can change the LOGLEVEL LOW line in
\IMail\Declude\global.cfg to LOGLEVEL DEBUG.  Then, send an E-mail
through to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and then switch back to LOGLEVEL LOW (the debug
mode adds huge amounts of information to the log file).  You can then
E-mail me the \IMail\Declude\dec.log file (as an attachment), and I can
take a look at it to see what is happening.
-Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



[Declude.JunkMail] DNS server

2002-05-29 Thread Craig Gittens

Is there a setting in the global.cfg to add a DNS server? Would it use this
server instead of the Imail settings?


Craig

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude scans all emails

2002-05-26 Thread Craig Gittens

Huh? He advocated virus run first.

Craig.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Landry
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 7:45 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude scans all emails


I rest my case, thanks for supporting my requested feature.

Bill

-Original Message-
From: John Tolmachoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude scans all emails


What about this scenerio:

A huge company that you receive hundreds of e-mails a day from but with
a mail admin not on the ball suddenly finds itself listed in spam bases
that cause the e-mails sent to you to be stopped by JunkMail.

At the same time, a virus starts spreading by way of that company.

You look at the directory and say, well, these are all legitimate.

Now you dump 300 mails into the vir directory and suddenly, your server
is swamped.

I see no reason not to have Declude Virus first.

John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA  92835
www.reliancesoft.com


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Landry
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 12:26 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude scans all emails

Well, I guess it's nice to know that it will at least have a place in
the
unlikely section of the database.  It would seem to me that any large
IMail installation that is using Declude would want this because of the
potential huge CPU savings of not having to virus scan all junk mail,
and
also being protect from placing legitimate, but possibly virus laden,
messages back into the queue for delivery.  So, I guess I a just bit
confused as to why you would consider it to be an unlikely feature
add?

Bill

-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 12:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude scans all emails



I would prefer to JunkMail filter before virus scanning, so would you
consider setting up a special queue directory that we could move
legitimate
e-mail messages that were held as spam so that Declude could
periodically
parse the directory and virus scan any messages in there, and if clean
move
them to the IMail spool directory.

It's unlikely that this will get added, but it has been added to the
suggestion database.
 -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .

---
[This e-mail was scanned for viruses by Pointshare's Virus Scanning
Service]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .

---
[This e-mail was scanned for viruses by Pointshare's Virus Scanning Service]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude scans all emails

2002-05-26 Thread Craig Gittens

Okay. What you should do now is get a Layer 4 switch that supports unique
sessions and have it NAT for the 2 or more Imail servers with one target
public IP on the outside. The switch should also have features to detect
failed services and switch load balancing off for that one server. Then you
can have Legato in an active/active if it's possible.

Craig.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Landry
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 11:10 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude scans all emails


John, I'm sorry if I came off sounding insulting, I know you're just trying
to help.  A little about our environment might be helpful.  We currently
have two RedHat 7.2/Postfix 1.1.10 gateway servers running in our DMZ and
they are running equal MX records for load-sharing.  They provide
first-level spam filtering and virus scanning with RAV antivirus.

Our IMail servers are dual proc systems with lots of memory and they run in
an active/passive Legato cluster, with the backend mail storage on a storage
area network that is dual-fiber connected to the front-end processors.  All
of the user account information is stored in a SQL database that is setup in
another Legato active/passive cluster with the databases store on the SAN.
Declude and F-Prot are installed on the IMail virtual drive on the SAN,
where they provide the second level spam filtering and virus scanning.  The
IMail servers forward all outbound e-mail to the gateway servers for final
delivery.

All of this is to say that we are geared up to handle a lot of e-mail.  We
try to be as efficient and effective as possible, and optimize wherever we
can, thus the desire to keep virus scanning on the IMail server to the
absolute minimum necessary.

Anyway, we love the Declude JunkMail/Virus package and will work with what
we have.

Regards,

Bill

-Original Message-
From: John Tolmachoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 5:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude scans all emails


Well, this is a discussion forum.

Very true, I deal with small potatoes compared to most of you out there.

Maybe, if I am fortunate, I can work for a larger company in the future.
Would help my pocket book too. But I am at where I am at at least for
now.

ANYWAYS, I am going to think about this and try to understand it from
your prospective.

One thought I do have in regards to your post after this one, is that
what you listed is maybe too much to ask of one server. Just a thought
now.

I know Len talks about Imgate and it sounds good. I don't know, if I was
looking at the volume like you say, I might want to split the load.

If there was a gateway of first server receiving all the mail, it could
then scan for junkmail and virus, then forward to the main server. Like
I said, just random thoughts out of my head.

I have only be at this for about a year, so I am trying to learn.

John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA  92835
www.reliancesoft.com


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Landry
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 5:21 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude scans all emails

Yep, and I think you are totally off the mark.  Virus scanning huge
numbers
of e-mail messages is very CPU intensive and is wasted by scanning
e-mail
messages you do not intend to deliver, anyway, because the are spam.

I an IMail server running Declude JunkMail and Virus were receiving
500,000
e-mail messages per day, and 25% of those were spam, you wasted massive
amounts of CPU cycles virus scanning 125,000 message you have no
intention
of delivering in the first place.

Thus, it is much more efficient and logical to spam filter first and
only
virus scan those messages you actually intend to deliver.  Remember,
spam
filtering is much less resource intensive then virus scanning is, so do
it
first and only virus scan what's left.

So in this scenario, if 500 of the 125,000 messages you held for meeting
spam rules was legit, if there wan a holding directory that I could move
these messages into for Declude to pick up and virus scan, and if clean,
then have Declude move them into the IMail spool directory.

Anyway, this is a non-issue right now since Scott has said that this
will
not be a feature that will be added anytime soon, so for now we will
just
have to be careful about what held messages we manually move back into
the
spool directory for delivery.  One option for us will be to move them
into a
holding directory and then manually virus scan that directory with
F-Prot
before moving them into the spool directory for delivery - F-Prot seems
to
have no problem scanning IMail's D files.

Bill

-Original Message-
From: John Tolmachoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 4:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting

2002-05-02 Thread Craig Gittens


I have a question:

Would this work to document stuff?

WHITELIST FROM @datek.com   #revdns,badheaders

Craig
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting

2002-05-02 Thread Craig Gittens

As per user config goes:

I have the default.junkmail file in \imail\declude and a couple of users own
in \imail\declude\domain.com

Is this correct or do I have to put a default.junkmail file in the
\domain.com directory as well or instead?

Craig.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude v1.35 released

2002-02-02 Thread Craig Gittens

I am now catching up on list mail - Saturday at work.I just had to reply
to his one:   ROFL ROFL :)


Craig.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Shacklett
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude v1.35 released


I put this in global.cfg:

XINHEADER   X-Note: Tests failed: %testsfailed%

and I get lines like these in my awesome new Spam Review Message Header box:

X-Note: Tests failed: SPAMCOP2, BADHEADERS, SPAMHEADERS, WEIGHT10, WEIGHT18,
WEIGHT182

I'm having trouble getting any work done, what with trying to see the screen
through copious tears of absolute joy.



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



[Declude.JunkMail] DUL questions

2002-01-25 Thread Craig Gittens

I have been reading the JunkMail Manual and I have a couple of questions. We
are an ISP and have numerous DULs. How would JunkMail handle that? If the IP
was in the DUL DB would Imail Declude not relay for my own IP's? If so, I
assume I would have to WHITELIST them, correct? Now, as for travelling
persons using SMTP Auth..would the same thing happen?


Craig.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .