RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting Spam

2007-09-07 Thread Dave Beckstrom
I used www.betterwhois.com and the whois service at www.netsol.com and
neither showed the domains had been registered.   Guess I'll have to try
your site.  Thanks!

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Colbeck,
 Andrew
 Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 6:41 PM
 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting Spam
 
 Well, the easy part is answering your question about the domains.
 
 Each of the payload domains was registered today, so whatever service
 you're using to look up the registrations is probably using a database
 at least a day behind.
 
 I use (for example) this site to my satisfaction:
 
 http://whois.domaintools.com/sdsdm.com
 
 
 
 Andrew.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom
  Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 3:07 PM
  To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
  Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting Spam
 
  We're getting a rash of spam that doesn't score high enough
  to be blocked.
  In the past I've looked up the domain owner of the site
  listed in the spam
  and been able to identify sometimes dozens of domains owned
  by the spammer,
  then I've put that list into a filter and blocked the domains
  before they
  were all used in new spam sent to us.
 
  I did a whois on some of the domains and they all show as
  available and
  unregistered.  Yet when I go to the domain, it does take me
  to the spammers
  site.  How can these domains be functional and show as available to be
  registered at the same time?
 
  Below is a paste of one of the spams.  I added 3 additional
  domains that
  have appeared in this same asshole's spam so that you can see
  the pattern of
  domains he is using.
 
  How do I block these?
 
  Dave
 
 
 
  X-Note: 
  X-Note: Spam Score: [18]
  X-Note: Scan Time: 16:47:18 on 06 Sep 2007
  X-Note: Spool File: 35111367.eml
  X-Note: Server Name: dsl88-233-31730.ttnet.net.tr
  X-Note: SMTP Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  X-Note: Reverse DNS  IP: dsl88-233-31730.ttnet.net.tr
  [88.233.123.242]
  X-Note: Country Chain: TURKEY-destination
  X-Note: Failed Weights: SORBS-WEB [5], FIVETENSRC [4], HELOBOGUS [5],
  SPFUNKNOWN [1], Filter_Country [8], WEIGHT10 [10], WEIGHT14 [14]
  X-Note: 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Tam Genois [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 1:15 PM
  Subject: [SPAM]- Score (12)tuile
 
  How it is going Genois
  Do you want to have an average to small penis all of your
  life? No, you
  don't
 
  dae Hays
  http://soltepec.com/
  http://selenan.com/
  http://www.seriia.com/
  http://www.sdsdm.com/
 
 
 
 
 
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 
 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting Spam

2007-09-07 Thread Dave Beckstrom
Found out that invURIBL wasn't working correctly on my server.  It was
finding the wrong IP address for the DNS server.  Once I fixed that, all of
those spams suddenly ceased from being delivered to our inboxes!  *grin  

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin
Cox
 Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 6:58 PM
 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting Spam
 
 I use a command line tool from www.whoisview.com that works well for both
 domains and IP blocks.
 
 Occasionally I run into a domain that doesn't resolve, but when that
happens
 I also have trouble from registrar sites like netsol and godaddy.
 www.freewho.com generally works well, though.
 
 Darin.
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Colbeck, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
 Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 7:40 PM
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting Spam
 
 
 Well, the easy part is answering your question about the domains.
 
 Each of the payload domains was registered today, so whatever service
 you're using to look up the registrations is probably using a database
 at least a day behind.
 
 I use (for example) this site to my satisfaction:
 
 http://whois.domaintools.com/sdsdm.com
 
 
 
 Andrew.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom
  Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 3:07 PM
  To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
  Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting Spam
 
  We're getting a rash of spam that doesn't score high enough
  to be blocked.
  In the past I've looked up the domain owner of the site
  listed in the spam
  and been able to identify sometimes dozens of domains owned
  by the spammer,
  then I've put that list into a filter and blocked the domains
  before they
  were all used in new spam sent to us.
 
  I did a whois on some of the domains and they all show as
  available and
  unregistered.  Yet when I go to the domain, it does take me
  to the spammers
  site.  How can these domains be functional and show as available to be
  registered at the same time?
 
  Below is a paste of one of the spams.  I added 3 additional
  domains that
  have appeared in this same asshole's spam so that you can see
  the pattern of
  domains he is using.
 
  How do I block these?
 
  Dave
 
 
 
  X-Note: 
  X-Note: Spam Score: [18]
  X-Note: Scan Time: 16:47:18 on 06 Sep 2007
  X-Note: Spool File: 35111367.eml
  X-Note: Server Name: dsl88-233-31730.ttnet.net.tr
  X-Note: SMTP Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  X-Note: Reverse DNS  IP: dsl88-233-31730.ttnet.net.tr
  [88.233.123.242]
  X-Note: Country Chain: TURKEY-destination
  X-Note: Failed Weights: SORBS-WEB [5], FIVETENSRC [4], HELOBOGUS [5],
  SPFUNKNOWN [1], Filter_Country [8], WEIGHT10 [10], WEIGHT14 [14]
  X-Note: 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Tam Genois [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 1:15 PM
  Subject: [SPAM]- Score (12)tuile
 
  How it is going Genois
  Do you want to have an average to small penis all of your
  life? No, you
  don't
 
  dae Hays
  http://soltepec.com/
  http://selenan.com/
  http://www.seriia.com/
  http://www.sdsdm.com/
 
 
 
 
 
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 
 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 
 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting Spam

2007-09-06 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Well, the easy part is answering your question about the domains.

Each of the payload domains was registered today, so whatever service
you're using to look up the registrations is probably using a database
at least a day behind.

I use (for example) this site to my satisfaction:

http://whois.domaintools.com/sdsdm.com



Andrew.


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
 Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom
 Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 3:07 PM
 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting Spam
 
 We're getting a rash of spam that doesn't score high enough 
 to be blocked.
 In the past I've looked up the domain owner of the site 
 listed in the spam
 and been able to identify sometimes dozens of domains owned 
 by the spammer,
 then I've put that list into a filter and blocked the domains 
 before they
 were all used in new spam sent to us.
 
 I did a whois on some of the domains and they all show as 
 available and
 unregistered.  Yet when I go to the domain, it does take me 
 to the spammers
 site.  How can these domains be functional and show as available to be
 registered at the same time?
 
 Below is a paste of one of the spams.  I added 3 additional 
 domains that
 have appeared in this same asshole's spam so that you can see 
 the pattern of
 domains he is using. 
 
 How do I block these?
 
 Dave
 
 
 
 X-Note: 
 X-Note: Spam Score: [18]
 X-Note: Scan Time: 16:47:18 on 06 Sep 2007
 X-Note: Spool File: 35111367.eml
 X-Note: Server Name: dsl88-233-31730.ttnet.net.tr
 X-Note: SMTP Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 X-Note: Reverse DNS  IP: dsl88-233-31730.ttnet.net.tr 
 [88.233.123.242]
 X-Note: Country Chain: TURKEY-destination
 X-Note: Failed Weights: SORBS-WEB [5], FIVETENSRC [4], HELOBOGUS [5],
 SPFUNKNOWN [1], Filter_Country [8], WEIGHT10 [10], WEIGHT14 [14]
 X-Note: 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Tam Genois [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 1:15 PM
 Subject: [SPAM]- Score (12)tuile
 
 How it is going Genois
 Do you want to have an average to small penis all of your 
 life? No, you
 don't
 
 dae Hays
 http://soltepec.com/
 http://selenan.com/
 http://www.seriia.com/
 http://www.sdsdm.com/
 
 
 
 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting Spam

2007-09-06 Thread Darin Cox
I use a command line tool from www.whoisview.com that works well for both 
domains and IP blocks.

Occasionally I run into a domain that doesn't resolve, but when that happens 
I also have trouble from registrar sites like netsol and godaddy. 
www.freewho.com generally works well, though.

Darin.


- Original Message - 
From: Colbeck, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 7:40 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting Spam


Well, the easy part is answering your question about the domains.

Each of the payload domains was registered today, so whatever service
you're using to look up the registrations is probably using a database
at least a day behind.

I use (for example) this site to my satisfaction:

http://whois.domaintools.com/sdsdm.com



Andrew.


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom
 Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 3:07 PM
 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting Spam

 We're getting a rash of spam that doesn't score high enough
 to be blocked.
 In the past I've looked up the domain owner of the site
 listed in the spam
 and been able to identify sometimes dozens of domains owned
 by the spammer,
 then I've put that list into a filter and blocked the domains
 before they
 were all used in new spam sent to us.

 I did a whois on some of the domains and they all show as
 available and
 unregistered.  Yet when I go to the domain, it does take me
 to the spammers
 site.  How can these domains be functional and show as available to be
 registered at the same time?

 Below is a paste of one of the spams.  I added 3 additional
 domains that
 have appeared in this same asshole's spam so that you can see
 the pattern of
 domains he is using.

 How do I block these?

 Dave



 X-Note: 
 X-Note: Spam Score: [18]
 X-Note: Scan Time: 16:47:18 on 06 Sep 2007
 X-Note: Spool File: 35111367.eml
 X-Note: Server Name: dsl88-233-31730.ttnet.net.tr
 X-Note: SMTP Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 X-Note: Reverse DNS  IP: dsl88-233-31730.ttnet.net.tr
 [88.233.123.242]
 X-Note: Country Chain: TURKEY-destination
 X-Note: Failed Weights: SORBS-WEB [5], FIVETENSRC [4], HELOBOGUS [5],
 SPFUNKNOWN [1], Filter_Country [8], WEIGHT10 [10], WEIGHT14 [14]
 X-Note: 


 -Original Message-
 From: Tam Genois [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 1:15 PM
 Subject: [SPAM]- Score (12)tuile

 How it is going Genois
 Do you want to have an average to small penis all of your
 life? No, you
 don't

 dae Hays
 http://soltepec.com/
 http://selenan.com/
 http://www.seriia.com/
 http://www.sdsdm.com/





 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting spam footer

2005-09-19 Thread Don Brown
Just kids with more imagination than knowledge


Sunday, September 18, 2005, 6:38:03 PM, Darin Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DC   
DC  
DC Thought this was interesting... a spammer trying to  use fear of
DC prosecution to stop people from reporting their email as  spam.
DC  
DC  
DC  
DC The spam was sent to a postmaster address  never used for outgoing mail...
DC  
DC  
DC  
DC Darin.
DC  
DC  
DC  
DC =
DC IMPORTANT INFORMATION  CONCERNING THIS COMMERCIAL MESSAGE
DC IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CAN-SPAM ACT OF  2003
DC This is one of a number of commercial email messages that you,
DC or  someone using your computer, agreed to receive this message
DC WARNING!!!
DC ANY  PERSON REPORTING ALLEGED SPAM TO ANY PERSON, PERSONS, ISPs
DC OR ENTITIES WITHOUT  PHYSICAL PROOF OF SAID CLAIM IS GUILTY OF
DC BOTH FRAUD AND A CIVIL CRIME AND WILL  BE PURSUED AND PROSECUTED
DC TO THE FULLEST EXTENT OF THE LAW. FURTHER, SHOULD SAID  ALLEGATION
DC RESULT IN ANY INTERRUPTION OF NORMAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY OF THE
DC COMPANY  AND/OR RESULT IN LOSS OF INCOME AND/OR RESULT IN
DC UNNECESSARY EXPENSES, A CIVIL  SUIT WILL BE BROUGHT 
DC  

DC  
DC  
DC  

DC   



Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting spam footer

2005-09-18 Thread Michael Jaworski
Title: Message



It 
looks like a great opportunity to actually meet a real live spammer in person in 
front of a judge. Sign me up.

Mike




-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Darin CoxSent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 4:38 
PMTo: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com; 
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting 
spam footer
Thought this was interesting... a spammer trying to 
usefear of prosecutionto stop people from reporting their email as 
spam.

Thespam was sent to a postmasteraddress 
never used for outgoing mail...

Darin.

=IMPORTANT INFORMATION 
CONCERNING THIS COMMERCIAL MESSAGEIN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CAN-SPAM ACT OF 
2003This is one of a number of commercial email messages that you,or 
someone using your computer, agreed to receive this messageWARNING!!!ANY 
PERSON REPORTING ALLEGED SPAM TO ANY PERSON, PERSONS, ISPs OR ENTITIES WITHOUT 
PHYSICAL PROOF OF SAID CLAIM IS GUILTY OF BOTH FRAUD AND A CIVIL CRIME AND WILL 
BE PURSUED AND PROSECUTED TO THE FULLEST EXTENT OF THE LAW. FURTHER, SHOULD SAID 
ALLEGATION RESULT IN ANY INTERRUPTION OF NORMAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY OF THE COMPANY 
AND/OR RESULT IN LOSS OF INCOME AND/OR RESULT IN UNNECESSARY EXPENSES, A CIVIL 
SUIT WILL BE BROUGHT 




Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting spam footer

2005-09-18 Thread Dave Doherty




OK, so I guess the point is the recipient 
has to prove that the message is spam? Sounds like "blame the victim"... And 
maybe the recipient has to buy what's being offered to avoid running afoul of 
the "LOSS OF INCOME" claim.

And what was being advertised? 
Anything useful to the recipient?
Did this come from a source in the US? Interesting 
"English" there is the lower-case sentence... Mike, my guess is there's no court 
with jursidiction. But if it WEREprosecuted in the US, I would love to 
attend the trial!

-Dave Doherty
Skywaves, Inc.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Darin Cox 
  To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 
  ; Declude.JunkMail@declude.com 
  
  Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 7:38 
  PM
  Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting 
  spam footer
  
  Thought this was interesting... a spammer trying 
  to usefear of prosecutionto stop people from reporting their email 
  as spam.
  
  Thespam was sent to a 
  postmasteraddress never used for outgoing mail...
  
  Darin.
  
  =IMPORTANT INFORMATION 
  CONCERNING THIS COMMERCIAL MESSAGEIN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CAN-SPAM ACT OF 
  2003This is one of a number of commercial email messages that you,or 
  someone using your computer, agreed to receive this 
  messageWARNING!!!ANY PERSON REPORTING ALLEGED SPAM TO ANY PERSON, 
  PERSONS, ISPs OR ENTITIES WITHOUT PHYSICAL PROOF OF SAID CLAIM IS GUILTY OF 
  BOTH FRAUD AND A CIVIL CRIME AND WILL BE PURSUED AND PROSECUTED TO THE FULLEST 
  EXTENT OF THE LAW. FURTHER, SHOULD SAID ALLEGATION RESULT IN ANY INTERRUPTION 
  OF NORMAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY OF THE COMPANY AND/OR RESULT IN LOSS OF INCOME 
  AND/OR RESULT IN UNNECESSARY EXPENSES, A CIVIL SUIT WILL BE BROUGHT 
  
  
  


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting spam footer

2005-09-18 Thread Darin Cox



The site being advertised was www.ebay-laptop.com. Silly 
really. They're just asking for trouble with that statement.

Came in from 82.96.105.2, but with a fake yahoo 
email address.
Darin.


- Original Message - 
From: Dave Doherty 
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com 

Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 8:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting spam footer


OK, so I guess the point is the recipient 
has to prove that the message is spam? Sounds like "blame the victim"... And 
maybe the recipient has to buy what's being offered to avoid running afoul of 
the "LOSS OF INCOME" claim.

And what was being advertised? 
Anything useful to the recipient?
Did this come from a source in the US? Interesting 
"English" there is the lower-case sentence... Mike, my guess is there's no court 
with jursidiction. But if it WEREprosecuted in the US, I would love to 
attend the trial!

-Dave Doherty
Skywaves, Inc.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Darin Cox 
  To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 
  ; Declude.JunkMail@declude.com 
  
  Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 7:38 
  PM
  Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting 
  spam footer
  
  Thought this was interesting... a spammer trying 
  to usefear of prosecutionto stop people from reporting their email 
  as spam.
  
  Thespam was sent to a 
  postmasteraddress never used for outgoing mail...
  
  Darin.
  
  =IMPORTANT INFORMATION 
  CONCERNING THIS COMMERCIAL MESSAGEIN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CAN-SPAM ACT OF 
  2003This is one of a number of commercial email messages that you,or 
  someone using your computer, agreed to receive this 
  messageWARNING!!!ANY PERSON REPORTING ALLEGED SPAM TO ANY PERSON, 
  PERSONS, ISPs OR ENTITIES WITHOUT PHYSICAL PROOF OF SAID CLAIM IS GUILTY OF 
  BOTH FRAUD AND A CIVIL CRIME AND WILL BE PURSUED AND PROSECUTED TO THE FULLEST 
  EXTENT OF THE LAW. FURTHER, SHOULD SAID ALLEGATION RESULT IN ANY INTERRUPTION 
  OF NORMAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY OF THE COMPANY AND/OR RESULT IN LOSS OF INCOME 
  AND/OR RESULT IN UNNECESSARY EXPENSES, A CIVIL SUIT WILL BE BROUGHT 
  
  
  


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting spam footer

2005-09-18 Thread Dave Doherty



Well, the website resolves to 
82.96.105.6, so at least they are consistent. It's a Euro IP address. 
Here's what RIPE reports about the 
IP:

% This is the RIPE Whois query server #2.% 
The objects are in RPSL format.%% Note: the default output of the RIPE 
Whois server% is changed. Your tools may need to be adjusted. See% 
http://www.ripe.net/db/news/abuse-proposal-20050331.html% for more details.%% Rights restricted by 
copyright.% See http://www.ripe.net/db/copyright.html

% Note: This output has been 
filtered.% To receive output for a 
database update, use the "-B" flag

% Information related to '82.96.105.0 - 
82.96.105.255'

inetnum: 
82.96.105.0 - 82.96.105.255netname: 
DE-ITelligencedescr: ITelligence 
sprlcountry: 
DEadmin-c: 
PN357-RIPEtech-c: 
PN357-RIPEstatus: ASSIGNED 
PAmnt-by: 
PROBE-MNTmnt-lower: 
PROBE-MNTsource: RIPE # 
Filtered

person: 
Philippe Nihouladdress: ITelligence 
sprl 
47, Place 
Favresse 
La Hulpe, 
1310 
BEphone: +32 
6551170fax-no: +32 
6551170e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]nic-hdl: 
PN357-RIPEmnt-by: 
PROBE-MNTsource: RIPE # 
Filtered

% Information related to 
'82.96.64.0/18AS29686'

route: 
82.96.64.0/18descr: Probe Networks 
european networkorigin: 
AS29686mnt-by: 
PROBE-MNTsource: RIPE # 
Filtered




  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Darin Cox 
  To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com 
  
  Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 9:35 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 
  Interesting spam footer
  
  The site being advertised was www.ebay-laptop.com. Silly 
  really. They're just asking for trouble with that 
statement.
  
  Came in from 82.96.105.2, but with a fake yahoo 
  email address.
  Darin.
  
  
  - Original Message - 
  From: Dave Doherty 

  To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com 
  
  Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 8:54 PM
  Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting spam 
footer
  
  
  OK, so I guess the point is the 
  recipient has to prove that the message is spam? Sounds like "blame the 
  victim"... And maybe the recipient has to buy what's being offered to avoid 
  running afoul of the "LOSS OF INCOME" claim.
  
  And what was being advertised? 
  Anything useful to the recipient?
  Did this come from a source in the US? Interesting 
  "English" there is the lower-case sentence... Mike, my guess is there's no 
  court with jursidiction. But if it WEREprosecuted in the US, I would 
  love to attend the trial!
  
  -Dave Doherty
  Skywaves, Inc.
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Darin Cox 
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 
; Declude.JunkMail@declude.com 

Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 7:38 
PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting 
spam footer

Thought this was interesting... a spammer 
trying to usefear of prosecutionto stop people from reporting 
their email as spam.

Thespam was sent to a 
postmasteraddress never used for outgoing mail...

Darin.

=IMPORTANT INFORMATION 
CONCERNING THIS COMMERCIAL MESSAGEIN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CAN-SPAM ACT OF 
2003This is one of a number of commercial email messages that you,or 
someone using your computer, agreed to receive this 
messageWARNING!!!ANY PERSON REPORTING ALLEGED SPAM TO ANY PERSON, 
PERSONS, ISPs OR ENTITIES WITHOUT PHYSICAL PROOF OF SAID CLAIM IS GUILTY OF 
BOTH FRAUD AND A CIVIL CRIME AND WILL BE PURSUED AND PROSECUTED TO THE 
FULLEST EXTENT OF THE LAW. FURTHER, SHOULD SAID ALLEGATION RESULT IN ANY 
INTERRUPTION OF NORMAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY OF THE COMPANY AND/OR RESULT IN 
LOSS OF INCOME AND/OR RESULT IN UNNECESSARY EXPENSES, A CIVIL SUIT WILL BE 
BROUGHT 




Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting spam...

2003-08-14 Thread Matt Robertson
Yes, I got one of those personally.  Incredibly cheeky, but no doubt there are people 
dumb enough to fall for it.  If there weren't, we wouldn't still be getting those 
Nigerian scams.  Got one of those yesterday, too.

Visited their web site (which offers English and Russian language versions) and they 
have a not-too-convincing disclaimer saying they had nothing to do with the spam.

--
---
 Matt Robertson, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 MSB Designs, Inc. http://mysecretbase.com
---

--
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting spam...

2003-08-14 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Thanks, Kami.  I've started a new section in one of my JunkMail Pro text
filter files called Phishing for similar attempts to garner e-mail
addresses and credit cards numbers.

Andrew 8)

-Original Message-
From: Kami Razvan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 2:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting spam...


Hi;
I just saw a spam that I think we all need to block... 

=

Important notice


We have just charged your credit card for money laundry service in amount of
$234.65 (because you are either child pornography webmaster or deal with
dirty money, which require us to layndry them and then send to your checking
account). 
If you feel this transaction was made by our mistake, please press No.
If you confirm this transaction, please press Yes and fill in the form
below.

Enter your credit card number here: 

Enter your credit card expiration date:
 
  
Contacts: 
Phone: +5982 902 5627 
Fax: +5982 902 3114 
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
ICQ: 156746629 

==

It should be interesting to see variations of this ..

Regards,
Kami
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.