RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamCop, OSSRC, and OSSOFT Tests

2002-11-13 Thread Ron Harris
Thanks John and Terry.  I think I have a very good plan of attack.  Both of
your replies were very insightful.

Ron

 -Original Message-
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com]  On Behalf Of Smart Business
Lists
Sent:   Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:39 AM
To: Ron Harris
Subject:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamCop, OSSRC, and OSSOFT Tests

Ron,

Tuesday, November 12, 2002 you wrote:
RH I currently Hold a lot of e-mail failing a lot of the open relay tests.

The only two tests I hold directly are ORDB and SNIFFER.  ORDB is
about 99% for me and SNIFFER is less but still very high.  Mainly
SNIFFER fails on lists and personal messages from people who have
spam domain addresses.  ORDB only catches about 3.6% of our failed
messages so it is not a big deal one way or the other.

RH I am considering holding SpamCop and OSSRC also. I have not
RH noticed any legitimate e-mail failing these two tests. Can you
RH reply with some opinions please?

SPAMCOP is my number 3 test in terms of number of failed messages.
It ranks at 60.22% of failed messages compared to SNIFFER's 75.5%.
But it fails too many legitimate messages for my users.

OSSRC ranks 12th at 14.3% of failed messages but it also fails too
many messages for me to hold on it alone.

However, I weight both SPAMCOP and OSSRC so that any other test
failed with them will trigger a HOLD.

Keep in mind that we monitor HOLD and on average have to unhold
about 2% of filtered messages.

RH Also, I currently hold e-mail failing the OSSOFT, which will hold
RH Yahoo mail. How does everyone else handle this issue?

I weight OSSOFT the same as SPAMCOP and OSSRC.  It fails about 4%
of our failed messages.

But I think that every user community is probably different and ours
certainly changes over time so I do monitor and tweak these settings
frequently.


HTH

Terry Fritts

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamCop, OSSRC, and OSSOFT Tests

2002-11-12 Thread John Tolmachoff
I currently give a weight of 16 to SpamCop, forcing the message to either
fail 2 minor tests or one other major test. (Subject modification 15-19,
hold at 20.)

Here is what Declude has to say about OSSRC:

Osirusoft's Confirmed Spam Source list. These are sites that continually
spam and have been manually added, after multiple nominations. Apparently
the same as Spews. Warning: Lists a number of legitimate mail servers that
happen to have the same Class C address space as spammers. Has TXT records.

Therefore, I do not use it, as it is guilty by association.

Here is what Declude has to say about OSSOFT:

Osirusoft's list of Spamware Software Developers. It is believed that these
are IP ranges of companies that are known to produce spam software. Similar
to or the same as SPAMHAUS/SBL test. Has TXT records.

I have given this test a weight of 2. My thinking is that although they are
known to produce SPAM, they have not been shown very in-effective in Scott's
monthly log.

John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA  92835
www.reliancesoft.com



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamCop, OSSRC, and OSSOFT Tests

2002-11-12 Thread Smart Business Lists
Ron,

Tuesday, November 12, 2002 you wrote:
RH I currently Hold a lot of e-mail failing a lot of the open relay tests.

The only two tests I hold directly are ORDB and SNIFFER.  ORDB is
about 99% for me and SNIFFER is less but still very high.  Mainly
SNIFFER fails on lists and personal messages from people who have
spam domain addresses.  ORDB only catches about 3.6% of our failed
messages so it is not a big deal one way or the other.

RH I am considering holding SpamCop and OSSRC also. I have not
RH noticed any legitimate e-mail failing these two tests. Can you
RH reply with some opinions please?

SPAMCOP is my number 3 test in terms of number of failed messages.
It ranks at 60.22% of failed messages compared to SNIFFER's 75.5%.
But it fails too many legitimate messages for my users.

OSSRC ranks 12th at 14.3% of failed messages but it also fails too
many messages for me to hold on it alone.

However, I weight both SPAMCOP and OSSRC so that any other test
failed with them will trigger a HOLD.

Keep in mind that we monitor HOLD and on average have to unhold
about 2% of filtered messages.

RH Also, I currently hold e-mail failing the OSSOFT, which will hold
RH Yahoo mail. How does everyone else handle this issue?

I weight OSSOFT the same as SPAMCOP and OSSRC.  It fails about 4%
of our failed messages.

But I think that every user community is probably different and ours
certainly changes over time so I do monitor and tweak these settings
frequently.


HTH

Terry Fritts

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamCop, OSSRC, and OSSOFT Tests

2002-11-12 Thread John Tolmachoff
I have given this test a weight of 2. My thinking is that although they are
known to produce SPAM, they have not been shown very in-effective in Scott's
monthly log.

Darn keyboard virus. Let me try that again.

...they have not been shown to be very effective in...

John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA  92835
www.reliancesoft.com



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.