RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned
Here is a preliminary list, not all have been verified and several are currently being worked on: (Note these does not include Declude adds for new functionality) Email me if you are aware of a known issue that is not on this list. *Line Terminator Problem *Auto whitelist Imail 2006 *Reported Memory Leaks Decludeproc crash on zero pointers *Zerohour test doesn't operate as other tests *Zip vulnerability *Attach function bug (forward as attachment) *When there is a MIME header mismatch Declude assumes it is an executable *Incorrectly filtering Object Data Vulnerability for MSOffice generated emails *Attached web pages seen as .com files *Yahoo CAL emails have header problems which cause improper blocking *Encoded attachments not correctly detected - long base64 *Prewhitelist is not skipping custom filters *Whitelisting messages in lower Log levels *SmarterMail order of Domains listed in xml for aliases David Barker Director of Product Development Your Email security is our business 978.499.2933 office 978.988.1311 fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:35 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Thanks, David. We appreciate your efforts. Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:26 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned I will see what I can do to bring together a list of known issues. Just give me some time (days) and I will get it posted. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:19 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Thanks, David. We appreciate your input. Is it feasible to post a list of known issues and/or issues being worked? I realize that's a lot of disclosure, and would probably increase call volume significantly, but I also know that would make me feel much more comfortable of someday being able to exercise our two-year-old unused SA, and upgrade to 4.x. Thanks again, Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:00 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Darin, Our engineer Dave Franco is looking at a way to rewrite every message to standardize the format in order to overcome the incorrect line terminator issue. As there are several other things he is working on I do not have a definitive release date for this, I am looking at moving around some additional resources to further expedite a solution. David Barker Director of Product Development Your Email security is our business 978.499.2933 office 978.988.1311 fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 9:38 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned David Barker, Can you tell us the status of this old case? What progress has been made on this seemingly critical issue? Darin. - Original Message - From: Michael Thomas - Mathbox [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 1:09 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Hi All, I said in my original email that Declude had been notified of LF only issue. I just looked back through my email and found the report. It was Declude case [06D-0BBF1866-F5A3] on Thu, 30 Mar 2006 22:29:58 -0500. Michael Thomas Mathbox 978-683-6718 1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free) --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned
John T, The Auto whitelist IMail 2006 is the issue I was referring to a few days ago in regards to wanting users that SMTP AUTH to be whitelisted. Were you were saying that this was working with 2006 and Declude 4.x? Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:35 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Here is a preliminary list, not all have been verified and several are currently being worked on: (Note these does not include Declude adds for new functionality) Email me if you are aware of a known issue that is not on this list. *Line Terminator Problem *Auto whitelist Imail 2006 *Reported Memory Leaks Decludeproc crash on zero pointers *Zerohour test doesn't operate as other tests *Zip vulnerability *Attach function bug (forward as attachment) *When there is a MIME header mismatch Declude assumes it is an executable *Incorrectly filtering Object Data Vulnerability for MSOffice generated emails *Attached web pages seen as .com files *Yahoo CAL emails have header problems which cause improper blocking *Encoded attachments not correctly detected - long base64 *Prewhitelist is not skipping custom filters *Whitelisting messages in lower Log levels *SmarterMail order of Domains listed in xml for aliases David Barker Director of Product Development Your Email security is our business 978.499.2933 office 978.988.1311 fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:35 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Thanks, David. We appreciate your efforts. Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:26 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned I will see what I can do to bring together a list of known issues. Just give me some time (days) and I will get it posted. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:19 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Thanks, David. We appreciate your input. Is it feasible to post a list of known issues and/or issues being worked? I realize that's a lot of disclosure, and would probably increase call volume significantly, but I also know that would make me feel much more comfortable of someday being able to exercise our two-year-old unused SA, and upgrade to 4.x. Thanks again, Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:00 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Darin, Our engineer Dave Franco is looking at a way to rewrite every message to standardize the format in order to overcome the incorrect line terminator issue. As there are several other things he is working on I do not have a definitive release date for this, I am looking at moving around some additional resources to further expedite a solution. David Barker Director of Product Development Your Email security is our business 978.499.2933 office 978.988.1311 fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 9:38 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned David Barker, Can you tell us the status of this old case? What progress has been made on this seemingly critical issue? Darin. - Original Message - From: Michael Thomas - Mathbox [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 1:09 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Hi All, I said in my original email that Declude had been notified of LF only issue. I just looked back through my email and found the report. It was Declude case [06D-0BBF1866-F5A3] on Thu, 30 Mar 2006 22:29:58 -0500. Michael Thomas Mathbox 978-683-6718 1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free) --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe,
RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned
IMail changed their addressbook from text files to a database in 2006 currently Declude does not read the databse. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:44 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned John T, The Auto whitelist IMail 2006 is the issue I was referring to a few days ago in regards to wanting users that SMTP AUTH to be whitelisted. Were you were saying that this was working with 2006 and Declude 4.x? Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:35 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Here is a preliminary list, not all have been verified and several are currently being worked on: (Note these does not include Declude adds for new functionality) Email me if you are aware of a known issue that is not on this list. *Line Terminator Problem *Auto whitelist Imail 2006 *Reported Memory Leaks Decludeproc crash on zero pointers *Zerohour test doesn't operate as other tests *Zip vulnerability *Attach function bug (forward as attachment) *When there is a MIME header mismatch Declude assumes it is an executable *Incorrectly filtering Object Data Vulnerability for MSOffice generated emails *Attached web pages seen as .com files *Yahoo CAL emails have header problems which cause improper blocking *Encoded attachments not correctly detected - long base64 *Prewhitelist is not skipping custom filters *Whitelisting messages in lower Log levels *SmarterMail order of Domains listed in xml for aliases David Barker Director of Product Development Your Email security is our business 978.499.2933 office 978.988.1311 fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:35 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Thanks, David. We appreciate your efforts. Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:26 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned I will see what I can do to bring together a list of known issues. Just give me some time (days) and I will get it posted. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:19 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Thanks, David. We appreciate your input. Is it feasible to post a list of known issues and/or issues being worked? I realize that's a lot of disclosure, and would probably increase call volume significantly, but I also know that would make me feel much more comfortable of someday being able to exercise our two-year-old unused SA, and upgrade to 4.x. Thanks again, Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:00 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Darin, Our engineer Dave Franco is looking at a way to rewrite every message to standardize the format in order to overcome the incorrect line terminator issue. As there are several other things he is working on I do not have a definitive release date for this, I am looking at moving around some additional resources to further expedite a solution. David Barker Director of Product Development Your Email security is our business 978.499.2933 office 978.988.1311 fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 9:38 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned David Barker, Can you tell us the status of this old case? What progress has been made on this seemingly critical issue? Darin. - Original Message - From: Michael Thomas - Mathbox [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 1:09 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation
Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned
Ahh, so I was correct. SMTP AUTH is still an issue. That in itself is a showstopper for us to move to IMail 2006 and Declude 4.x How soon until Declude will read this and auto whitelist, David? IMail 2006 was released a year ago. The following from your list are showstoppers for us to exercise our soon to expire, and as yet unused, SA and upgrade to Declude 4.x *Line Terminator Problem *Auto whitelist Imail 2006 *Reported Memory Leaks Decludeproc crash on zero pointers *Zip vulnerability *Attach function bug (forward as attachment) *When there is a MIME header mismatch Declude assumes it is an executable *Yahoo CAL emails have header problems which cause improper blocking *Encoded attachments not correctly detected - long base64 Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 11:10 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned IMail changed their addressbook from text files to a database in 2006 currently Declude does not read the databse. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:44 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned John T, The Auto whitelist IMail 2006 is the issue I was referring to a few days ago in regards to wanting users that SMTP AUTH to be whitelisted. Were you were saying that this was working with 2006 and Declude 4.x? Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:35 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Here is a preliminary list, not all have been verified and several are currently being worked on: (Note these does not include Declude adds for new functionality) Email me if you are aware of a known issue that is not on this list. *Line Terminator Problem *Auto whitelist Imail 2006 *Reported Memory Leaks Decludeproc crash on zero pointers *Zerohour test doesn't operate as other tests *Zip vulnerability *Attach function bug (forward as attachment) *When there is a MIME header mismatch Declude assumes it is an executable *Incorrectly filtering Object Data Vulnerability for MSOffice generated emails *Attached web pages seen as .com files *Yahoo CAL emails have header problems which cause improper blocking *Encoded attachments not correctly detected - long base64 *Prewhitelist is not skipping custom filters *Whitelisting messages in lower Log levels *SmarterMail order of Domains listed in xml for aliases David Barker Director of Product Development Your Email security is our business 978.499.2933 office 978.988.1311 fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:35 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Thanks, David. We appreciate your efforts. Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:26 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned I will see what I can do to bring together a list of known issues. Just give me some time (days) and I will get it posted. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:19 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Thanks, David. We appreciate your input. Is it feasible to post a list of known issues and/or issues being worked? I realize that's a lot of disclosure, and would probably increase call volume significantly, but I also know that would make me feel much more comfortable of someday being able to exercise our two-year-old unused SA, and upgrade to 4.x. Thanks again, Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:00 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Darin, Our engineer Dave Franco is looking at a way to rewrite every message to standardize the format in order
RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned
The Auto whitelist IMail 2006 is the issue I was referring to a few days ago in regards to wanting users that SMTP AUTH to be whitelisted. Were you were saying that this was working with 2006 and Declude 4.x? WHITELIST AUTH line in the Global.cfg is working as expected. The Auto Whitelist that I have heard is not working is the one that whitelists incoming based upon from address in the Imail contact address book. John T eServices For You Seek, and ye shall find! --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned
Darin, Many of these issues exist in your current version, upgrading is not going to make things worse, other than perhaps the Imail addressbook 2006. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 11:20 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Ahh, so I was correct. SMTP AUTH is still an issue. That in itself is a showstopper for us to move to IMail 2006 and Declude 4.x How soon until Declude will read this and auto whitelist, David? IMail 2006 was released a year ago. The following from your list are showstoppers for us to exercise our soon to expire, and as yet unused, SA and upgrade to Declude 4.x *Line Terminator Problem *Auto whitelist Imail 2006 *Reported Memory Leaks Decludeproc crash on zero pointers *Zip vulnerability *Attach function bug (forward as attachment) *When there is a MIME header mismatch Declude assumes it is an executable *Yahoo CAL emails have header problems which cause improper blocking *Encoded attachments not correctly detected - long base64 Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 11:10 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned IMail changed their addressbook from text files to a database in 2006 currently Declude does not read the databse. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:44 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned John T, The Auto whitelist IMail 2006 is the issue I was referring to a few days ago in regards to wanting users that SMTP AUTH to be whitelisted. Were you were saying that this was working with 2006 and Declude 4.x? Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:35 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Here is a preliminary list, not all have been verified and several are currently being worked on: (Note these does not include Declude adds for new functionality) Email me if you are aware of a known issue that is not on this list. *Line Terminator Problem *Auto whitelist Imail 2006 *Reported Memory Leaks Decludeproc crash on zero pointers *Zerohour test doesn't operate as other tests *Zip vulnerability *Attach function bug (forward as attachment) *When there is a MIME header mismatch Declude assumes it is an executable *Incorrectly filtering Object Data Vulnerability for MSOffice generated emails *Attached web pages seen as .com files *Yahoo CAL emails have header problems which cause improper blocking *Encoded attachments not correctly detected - long base64 *Prewhitelist is not skipping custom filters *Whitelisting messages in lower Log levels *SmarterMail order of Domains listed in xml for aliases David Barker Director of Product Development Your Email security is our business 978.499.2933 office 978.988.1311 fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:35 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Thanks, David. We appreciate your efforts. Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:26 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned I will see what I can do to bring together a list of known issues. Just give me some time (days) and I will get it posted. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:19 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Thanks, David. We appreciate your input. Is it feasible to post a list of known issues and/or issues being worked? I realize that's a lot of disclosure, and would probably increase call volume significantly, but I also know that would make me feel much more comfortable of someday being able to
Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned
Ahh... you're right. I was mixing the two issues together. Both are issues for us, though. Darin. - Original Message - From: John T (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 11:35 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned The Auto whitelist IMail 2006 is the issue I was referring to a few days ago in regards to wanting users that SMTP AUTH to be whitelisted. Were you were saying that this was working with 2006 and Declude 4.x? WHITELIST AUTH line in the Global.cfg is working as expected. The Auto Whitelist that I have heard is not working is the one that whitelists incoming based upon from address in the Imail contact address book. John T eServices For You Seek, and ye shall find! --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned
Hi David, What's the ETA on the address book issue? As I mentioned IMail 2006 was released a year ago. Many of our customers use the whitelist address book feature currently, so we cannot upgrade if that means losing that feature. Also, I don't believe most of these issues exist in 1.82 or 2.0.6, though I imagine they do in 3.x and 4.x. Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 11:43 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Darin, Many of these issues exist in your current version, upgrading is not going to make things worse, other than perhaps the Imail addressbook 2006. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 11:20 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Ahh, so I was correct. SMTP AUTH is still an issue. That in itself is a showstopper for us to move to IMail 2006 and Declude 4.x How soon until Declude will read this and auto whitelist, David? IMail 2006 was released a year ago. The following from your list are showstoppers for us to exercise our soon to expire, and as yet unused, SA and upgrade to Declude 4.x *Line Terminator Problem *Auto whitelist Imail 2006 *Reported Memory Leaks Decludeproc crash on zero pointers *Zip vulnerability *Attach function bug (forward as attachment) *When there is a MIME header mismatch Declude assumes it is an executable *Yahoo CAL emails have header problems which cause improper blocking *Encoded attachments not correctly detected - long base64 Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 11:10 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned IMail changed their addressbook from text files to a database in 2006 currently Declude does not read the databse. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:44 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned John T, The Auto whitelist IMail 2006 is the issue I was referring to a few days ago in regards to wanting users that SMTP AUTH to be whitelisted. Were you were saying that this was working with 2006 and Declude 4.x? Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:35 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Here is a preliminary list, not all have been verified and several are currently being worked on: (Note these does not include Declude adds for new functionality) Email me if you are aware of a known issue that is not on this list. *Line Terminator Problem *Auto whitelist Imail 2006 *Reported Memory Leaks Decludeproc crash on zero pointers *Zerohour test doesn't operate as other tests *Zip vulnerability *Attach function bug (forward as attachment) *When there is a MIME header mismatch Declude assumes it is an executable *Incorrectly filtering Object Data Vulnerability for MSOffice generated emails *Attached web pages seen as .com files *Yahoo CAL emails have header problems which cause improper blocking *Encoded attachments not correctly detected - long base64 *Prewhitelist is not skipping custom filters *Whitelisting messages in lower Log levels *SmarterMail order of Domains listed in xml for aliases David Barker Director of Product Development Your Email security is our business 978.499.2933 office 978.988.1311 fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:35 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Thanks, David. We appreciate your efforts. Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:26 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned I will see what I can do to bring together a list of known issues. Just give me some time (days) and I will get it posted.
RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned
Darin, let me put it plainly. If you put WHITELIST AUTH line in the Global.cfg file any user the sends out through your server via smtp and who authenticates to the server will be Whitelisted. In other words, SMTP AUTH whitelisting is and has been working. I have provided clear proof and others have posted like wise. The issue of AUTOWHITELIST via the Imail users contact address book is for incoming email from the internet to your users. That is what is not working. Questions? John T eServices For You Seek, and ye shall find! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 8:20 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Ahh, so I was correct. SMTP AUTH is still an issue. That in itself is a showstopper for us to move to IMail 2006 and Declude 4.x How soon until Declude will read this and auto whitelist, David? IMail 2006 was released a year ago. The following from your list are showstoppers for us to exercise our soon to expire, and as yet unused, SA and upgrade to Declude 4.x *Line Terminator Problem *Auto whitelist Imail 2006 *Reported Memory Leaks Decludeproc crash on zero pointers *Zip vulnerability *Attach function bug (forward as attachment) *When there is a MIME header mismatch Declude assumes it is an executable *Yahoo CAL emails have header problems which cause improper blocking *Encoded attachments not correctly detected - long base64 Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 11:10 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned IMail changed their addressbook from text files to a database in 2006 currently Declude does not read the databse. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:44 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned John T, The Auto whitelist IMail 2006 is the issue I was referring to a few days ago in regards to wanting users that SMTP AUTH to be whitelisted. Were you were saying that this was working with 2006 and Declude 4.x? Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:35 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Here is a preliminary list, not all have been verified and several are currently being worked on: (Note these does not include Declude adds for new functionality) Email me if you are aware of a known issue that is not on this list. *Line Terminator Problem *Auto whitelist Imail 2006 *Reported Memory Leaks Decludeproc crash on zero pointers *Zerohour test doesn't operate as other tests *Zip vulnerability *Attach function bug (forward as attachment) *When there is a MIME header mismatch Declude assumes it is an executable *Incorrectly filtering Object Data Vulnerability for MSOffice generated emails *Attached web pages seen as .com files *Yahoo CAL emails have header problems which cause improper blocking *Encoded attachments not correctly detected - long base64 *Prewhitelist is not skipping custom filters *Whitelisting messages in lower Log levels *SmarterMail order of Domains listed in xml for aliases David Barker Director of Product Development Your Email security is our business 978.499.2933 office 978.988.1311 fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:35 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Thanks, David. We appreciate your efforts. Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:26 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned I will see what I can do to bring together a list of known issues. Just give me some time (days) and I will get it posted. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned
Right. I responded in another email that I was mistakenly mixing the two issues thinking one thing and saying another... Sorry for the confusion. Darin. - Original Message - From: John T (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 12:41 PM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Darin, let me put it plainly. If you put WHITELIST AUTH line in the Global.cfg file any user the sends out through your server via smtp and who authenticates to the server will be Whitelisted. In other words, SMTP AUTH whitelisting is and has been working. I have provided clear proof and others have posted like wise. The issue of AUTOWHITELIST via the Imail users contact address book is for incoming email from the internet to your users. That is what is not working. Questions? John T eServices For You Seek, and ye shall find! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 8:20 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Ahh, so I was correct. SMTP AUTH is still an issue. That in itself is a showstopper for us to move to IMail 2006 and Declude 4.x How soon until Declude will read this and auto whitelist, David? IMail 2006 was released a year ago. The following from your list are showstoppers for us to exercise our soon to expire, and as yet unused, SA and upgrade to Declude 4.x *Line Terminator Problem *Auto whitelist Imail 2006 *Reported Memory Leaks Decludeproc crash on zero pointers *Zip vulnerability *Attach function bug (forward as attachment) *When there is a MIME header mismatch Declude assumes it is an executable *Yahoo CAL emails have header problems which cause improper blocking *Encoded attachments not correctly detected - long base64 Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 11:10 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned IMail changed their addressbook from text files to a database in 2006 currently Declude does not read the databse. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:44 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned John T, The Auto whitelist IMail 2006 is the issue I was referring to a few days ago in regards to wanting users that SMTP AUTH to be whitelisted. Were you were saying that this was working with 2006 and Declude 4.x? Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:35 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Here is a preliminary list, not all have been verified and several are currently being worked on: (Note these does not include Declude adds for new functionality) Email me if you are aware of a known issue that is not on this list. *Line Terminator Problem *Auto whitelist Imail 2006 *Reported Memory Leaks Decludeproc crash on zero pointers *Zerohour test doesn't operate as other tests *Zip vulnerability *Attach function bug (forward as attachment) *When there is a MIME header mismatch Declude assumes it is an executable *Incorrectly filtering Object Data Vulnerability for MSOffice generated emails *Attached web pages seen as .com files *Yahoo CAL emails have header problems which cause improper blocking *Encoded attachments not correctly detected - long base64 *Prewhitelist is not skipping custom filters *Whitelisting messages in lower Log levels *SmarterMail order of Domains listed in xml for aliases David Barker Director of Product Development Your Email security is our business 978.499.2933 office 978.988.1311 fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:35 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Thanks, David. We appreciate your efforts. Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:26
RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned
So does the NONSTANDARDHDR vulnerability test protect us from both of these problems? Mark Reimer IT System Admin American CareSource 972-308-6887 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 5:23 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned David, Thanks to both you and the other Dave for taking another look at this. Matt David Barker wrote: Darin, Our engineer Dave Franco is looking at a way to rewrite every message to standardize the format in order to overcome the incorrect line terminator issue. As there are several other things he is working on I do not have a definitive release date for this, I am looking at moving around some additional resources to further expedite a solution. David Barker Director of Product Development Your Email security is our business 978.499.2933 office 978.988.1311 fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 9:38 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned David Barker, Can you tell us the status of this old case? What progress has been made on this seemingly critical issue? Darin. - Original Message - From: Michael Thomas - Mathbox [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 1:09 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Hi All, I said in my original email that Declude had been notified of LF only issue. I just looked back through my email and found the report. It was Declude case [06D-0BBF1866-F5A3] on Thu, 30 Mar 2006 22:29:58 -0500. Michael Thomas Mathbox 978-683-6718 1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free) --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned
Hi Mark, Yes to a certain extent we are checking for no standard line terminators, however this problem is more evasive and requires additional functionality to correct. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Reimer Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 12:40 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned So does the NONSTANDARDHDR vulnerability test protect us from both of these problems? Mark Reimer IT System Admin American CareSource 972-308-6887 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 5:23 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned David, Thanks to both you and the other Dave for taking another look at this. Matt David Barker wrote: Darin, Our engineer Dave Franco is looking at a way to rewrite every message to standardize the format in order to overcome the incorrect line terminator issue. As there are several other things he is working on I do not have a definitive release date for this, I am looking at moving around some additional resources to further expedite a solution. David Barker Director of Product Development Your Email security is our business 978.499.2933 office 978.988.1311 fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 9:38 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned David Barker, Can you tell us the status of this old case? What progress has been made on this seemingly critical issue? Darin. - Original Message - From: Michael Thomas - Mathbox [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 1:09 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Hi All, I said in my original email that Declude had been notified of LF only issue. I just looked back through my email and found the report. It was Declude case [06D-0BBF1866-F5A3] on Thu, 30 Mar 2006 22:29:58 -0500. Michael Thomas Mathbox 978-683-6718 1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free) --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned
Just curious. Are many people using Michael's RFC violations test? If so how is it working out? Mark Reimer IT System Admin American CareSource 972-308-6887 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 12:43 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Hi Mark, Yes to a certain extent we are checking for no standard line terminators, however this problem is more evasive and requires additional functionality to correct. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Reimer Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 12:40 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned So does the NONSTANDARDHDR vulnerability test protect us from both of these problems? Mark Reimer IT System Admin American CareSource 972-308-6887 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 5:23 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned David, Thanks to both you and the other Dave for taking another look at this. Matt David Barker wrote: Darin, Our engineer Dave Franco is looking at a way to rewrite every message to standardize the format in order to overcome the incorrect line terminator issue. As there are several other things he is working on I do not have a definitive release date for this, I am looking at moving around some additional resources to further expedite a solution. David Barker Director of Product Development Your Email security is our business 978.499.2933 office 978.988.1311 fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 9:38 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned David Barker, Can you tell us the status of this old case? What progress has been made on this seemingly critical issue? Darin. - Original Message - From: Michael Thomas - Mathbox [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 1:09 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Hi All, I said in my original email that Declude had been notified of LF only issue. I just looked back through my email and found the report. It was Declude case [06D-0BBF1866-F5A3] on Thu, 30 Mar 2006 22:29:58 -0500. Michael Thomas Mathbox 978-683-6718 1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free) --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned
David Barker, Can you tell us the status of this old case? What progress has been made on this seemingly critical issue? Darin. - Original Message - From: Michael Thomas - Mathbox [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 1:09 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Hi All, I said in my original email that Declude had been notified of LF only issue. I just looked back through my email and found the report. It was Declude case [06D-0BBF1866-F5A3] on Thu, 30 Mar 2006 22:29:58 -0500. Michael Thomas Mathbox 978-683-6718 1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free) --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned
Darin, Our engineer Dave Franco is looking at a way to rewrite every message to standardize the format in order to overcome the incorrect line terminator issue. As there are several other things he is working on I do not have a definitive release date for this, I am looking at moving around some additional resources to further expedite a solution. David Barker Director of Product Development Your Email security is our business 978.499.2933 office 978.988.1311 fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 9:38 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned David Barker, Can you tell us the status of this old case? What progress has been made on this seemingly critical issue? Darin. - Original Message - From: Michael Thomas - Mathbox [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 1:09 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Hi All, I said in my original email that Declude had been notified of LF only issue. I just looked back through my email and found the report. It was Declude case [06D-0BBF1866-F5A3] on Thu, 30 Mar 2006 22:29:58 -0500. Michael Thomas Mathbox 978-683-6718 1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free) --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned
Thanks, David. We appreciate your input. Is it feasible to post a list of known issues and/or issues being worked? I realize that's a lot of disclosure, and would probably increase call volume significantly, but I also know that would make me feel much more comfortable of someday being able to exercise our two-year-old unused SA, and upgrade to 4.x. Thanks again, Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:00 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Darin, Our engineer Dave Franco is looking at a way to rewrite every message to standardize the format in order to overcome the incorrect line terminator issue. As there are several other things he is working on I do not have a definitive release date for this, I am looking at moving around some additional resources to further expedite a solution. David Barker Director of Product Development Your Email security is our business 978.499.2933 office 978.988.1311 fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 9:38 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned David Barker, Can you tell us the status of this old case? What progress has been made on this seemingly critical issue? Darin. - Original Message - From: Michael Thomas - Mathbox [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 1:09 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Hi All, I said in my original email that Declude had been notified of LF only issue. I just looked back through my email and found the report. It was Declude case [06D-0BBF1866-F5A3] on Thu, 30 Mar 2006 22:29:58 -0500. Michael Thomas Mathbox 978-683-6718 1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free) --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned
I will see what I can do to bring together a list of known issues. Just give me some time (days) and I will get it posted. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:19 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Thanks, David. We appreciate your input. Is it feasible to post a list of known issues and/or issues being worked? I realize that's a lot of disclosure, and would probably increase call volume significantly, but I also know that would make me feel much more comfortable of someday being able to exercise our two-year-old unused SA, and upgrade to 4.x. Thanks again, Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:00 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Darin, Our engineer Dave Franco is looking at a way to rewrite every message to standardize the format in order to overcome the incorrect line terminator issue. As there are several other things he is working on I do not have a definitive release date for this, I am looking at moving around some additional resources to further expedite a solution. David Barker Director of Product Development Your Email security is our business 978.499.2933 office 978.988.1311 fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 9:38 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned David Barker, Can you tell us the status of this old case? What progress has been made on this seemingly critical issue? Darin. - Original Message - From: Michael Thomas - Mathbox [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 1:09 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Hi All, I said in my original email that Declude had been notified of LF only issue. I just looked back through my email and found the report. It was Declude case [06D-0BBF1866-F5A3] on Thu, 30 Mar 2006 22:29:58 -0500. Michael Thomas Mathbox 978-683-6718 1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free) --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned
Thanks, David. We appreciate your efforts. Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:26 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned I will see what I can do to bring together a list of known issues. Just give me some time (days) and I will get it posted. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:19 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Thanks, David. We appreciate your input. Is it feasible to post a list of known issues and/or issues being worked? I realize that's a lot of disclosure, and would probably increase call volume significantly, but I also know that would make me feel much more comfortable of someday being able to exercise our two-year-old unused SA, and upgrade to 4.x. Thanks again, Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:00 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Darin, Our engineer Dave Franco is looking at a way to rewrite every message to standardize the format in order to overcome the incorrect line terminator issue. As there are several other things he is working on I do not have a definitive release date for this, I am looking at moving around some additional resources to further expedite a solution. David Barker Director of Product Development Your Email security is our business 978.499.2933 office 978.988.1311 fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 9:38 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned David Barker, Can you tell us the status of this old case? What progress has been made on this seemingly critical issue? Darin. - Original Message - From: Michael Thomas - Mathbox [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 1:09 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Hi All, I said in my original email that Declude had been notified of LF only issue. I just looked back through my email and found the report. It was Declude case [06D-0BBF1866-F5A3] on Thu, 30 Mar 2006 22:29:58 -0500. Michael Thomas Mathbox 978-683-6718 1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free) --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned
David, Thanks to both you and the other Dave for taking another look at this. Matt David Barker wrote: Darin, Our engineer Dave Franco is looking at a way to rewrite every message to standardize the format in order to overcome the incorrect line terminator issue. As there are several other things he is working on I do not have a definitive release date for this, I am looking at moving around some additional resources to further expedite a solution. David Barker Director of Product Development Your Email security is our business 978.499.2933 office 978.988.1311 fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 9:38 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned David Barker, Can you tell us the status of this old case? What progress has been made on this seemingly critical issue? Darin. - Original Message - From: Michael Thomas - Mathbox [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 1:09 AM Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned Hi All, I said in my original email that Declude had been notified of LF only issue. I just looked back through my email and found the report. It was Declude case [06D-0BBF1866-F5A3] on Thu, 30 Mar 2006 22:29:58 -0500. Michael Thomas Mathbox 978-683-6718 1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free) --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned
Hi All, I said in my original email that Declude had been notified of LF only issue. I just looked back through my email and found the report. It was Declude case [06D-0BBF1866-F5A3] on Thu, 30 Mar 2006 22:29:58 -0500. Michael Thomas Mathbox 978-683-6718 1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free) --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
