Re: [libreoffice-design] 4.0 Branding poll
Hi all, my vote: Branding from version 3.6: -1 Proposal by Aexyn.com: -1 V1 by Javier Antonio Nisa Ávila: -1 V2 by Javier Antonio Nisa Ávila: -1 V3 by Javier Antonio Nisa Ávila: -1 GIn-V1 by k-j: -1 GIn-V2 by k-j: -1 Minimal by Medieval: 1 ages by Medieval: 1 Proposal by Pedro: -1 Clear_Full_Official.png by Mateus.m.luna: 1 Clear_Full_Pref.png by Mateus.m.luna: 1 Clear_Green_Official.png by Mateus.m.luna: 0 Clear_Green_Pref.png by Mateus.m.luna: 0 Proposal by Alexander Wilms (original PNG): 1 Proposal by Alexander Wilms (at the right of the new SVG): 1 Proposal by Maxim Darák: 0 Proposal by H.Sparks: -1 Proposal by G Sparks: -1 Maybe we should redo this vote on some kind of voting service...? This seems a bit confusing and complicated! Paul -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: 4.0 Branding poll
Ähh I think it was intended to add the votes to the last mail, but then people stopped doing so, so now I think it's best to just send your vote and put everything in place later. And yes, I completely agree: this is a little chaotic and the vote should be redone with a voting system! Paul On 29/01/13 19:55, Samuel Mehrbrodt wrote: Hi, I'm not sure how the voting system is supposed to work. I took the last email, and added my votes to that. Others took the plain list from the first mail and added their votes to that. What is the right way? Maybe an online voting system would help? Samuel Am 29.01.2013 08:49, schrieb klaus-jürgen weghorn ol: Hi Kévin, Samuel and all voters, we should avoid such things like -3. Am 29.01.2013 08:24, schrieb Kévin PEIGNOT: V2 by Javier Antonio Nisa Ávila: -3 Everybody has one vote for or against and do it so. At least doing such changes at a legal vote is making your whole vote uncountable in mostly every country. I will say that because the next one will do a +10 and a -1000. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-design] 4.0 branding - current summarize
I think if enough people are paticipating in the vote for the new proposal, be it by up- or down-voting, it shouldn't really be any problem, or? Just my opinion, Paul On 29/01/13 22:42, Sophie Gautier wrote: Hi Mirek, On 29/01/2013 22:25, Mirek M. wrote: Hi everyone, Maxim created another proposal based on the feedback on his first: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Whiteboards/4.0_Branding#Proposal_by_Maxim_Dar.C3.A1k . I'm adding it to the poll, so please, if you've voted, vote on this proposal as well. Hum, changing the proposal when the voting has already begun is not the the best... Should I really ask members to make a full vote again including this proposal or do we handle it differently? Kind regards Sophie -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: Fwd: Re: A new old branding?
You have a good point there Marc! And I can confirm that many people around me (at school) do in fact use personas in all the applications which have it, which means mostly FF and chrome. But it seems to be very popular. regards Paul On 20/01/13 15:02, Marc Paré wrote: Le 2013-01-20 02:53, Jean-Francois Nifenecker a écrit : Hi Astron, Le 20/01/2013 02:02, Stefan Knorr a écrit : sorry for the OT stuff here... this is just re: personas. [...] [1] Not really sure if that's the intended audience – but to me it seems so, as power users would probably rather alter behaviour by installing extensions than doing fancy things with their toolbar background. I realise, I could be totally wrong here, though. I also think that power users won't give a damn about that persona thingy and that the others won't even know it exists and if they do, won't use it either. Since the idea has been introduced, I stood silent because, well, this is a thing of these days and I first fell rather ol'timer. Still, my questions are these: do we *need* that functionality? What does it brings WRT software use? Wouldn't the devs be better employed fixing bugs rather than developing one more (useless?) functionality which would in turn bring more bugs? *Who* would use the personas apart from marketers? BTW, I don't know anyone around me using Firefox and personas. I don't want to rain on the party but my POV is that TDF shouldn't go that route at this moment because the usage/cost ratio seems very low to me. Strange, where I teach, and where personas are available, my 240 kids in French classes ALL tailor their versions of FF and Chrome to what they want, they also exchange between each other information about the looks and feel of their software including their desktop looks and wallpapers. I agree with you that with professional people personas may take a back seat to functionality, but to the other larger group who use our software and the younger set, functionality includes the look and feel of their software as if defines them ... no matter how shallow a function you may think it is. A Lada may get us from point A to B ... but most people would prefer to get a hot looking car than a square box with 4 wheels to cart them around. Software functionality does include the look and feel otherwise we would not be adding any color to our brand and just go for black and white and save on toner cartridge cost ... and hey ... let's all just get B/W monitors. I don't know, but I also don't want to rain on your party either, by my POV is that the TDF should go this route as it adds to the popularity as well as gives us a larger usage base for our community product. This is a good functionality to add to the product. Cheers, Marc -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: 4.0 Branding and Out of Scope Designs
Personally I like the one by Alexander Wilms most, and also the one by Mateus.m.luna! On 20/01/13 19:04, Valentin wrote: The only good and professional looking mockups are the proposals by Alexander Wilms. All the others are looking a bit kiddy style ... https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:4.0_Rebranding.png 2013/1/20 Mirek M. maz...@gmail.com Hi Pawel, On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Pawel Konefal polish.a...@gmail.com wrote: From your three splashes, I would choose the second one, but I would prefer something more similar to 3.6 splashes - something like old 3.6 splash with white, normal 4 at right of the standard logo. Have you taken a look at the other proposals [1]? Are there any at all that you like? (I myself really like Mateus's proposals.) [1] https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Whiteboards/4.0_Branding -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-design] A new old branding?
They look really nice, I absolutely like the minimalistic style. But the logo must in that case be adapted and integrated in the color-scheme of each splash-screen, I even wonder where to place it while not disturbing the minimalistic layout...? The strength of this splash lies in it's simplicity, so one should be careful not to add something that makes it cluttered or is not fitting in. That's my opinion. Cheers Paul On 12/01/13 23:08, Charles-H. Schulz wrote: Good idea, although we ought to include Libreoffice's actual logo. Best, Charles Alexander Wilms alexander.wi...@zoho.com a écrit : Hi everyone, on the Deviantart page of Harvey Cabaguio someone mentioned an old design submission for the original LibreOffice brand: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/images/5/5f/AndyFitzsimon_ArtworkProposal_splashes.png It also kind of fits the minimalist swiss style, maybe the gradients should be a bit flatter. Would you mind if I ask the Designer (former Novell, now Red Hat employer) if he would license it under LGPLv3/MPL and use it as basis for a submission? Cheers Alex -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
