[Bug 1927100] Re: Slow file dialogs, open and save
Just a quick confirmation that with the patch applied, I've had no gvfsd-trash deadlocks requiring a pkill in over a week. It was previously hourly or worse. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927100 Title: Slow file dialogs, open and save To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1927100/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1940657] Re: Cannot type in address bar nor page content in live session
[Expired for gnome-shell (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940657 Title: Cannot type in address bar nor page content in live session To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1940657/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1948556] [NEW] calendar has low contrast in both default themes
Public bug reported: Both default dark and light themes of calendar have very low contrast between event and text colour of events. Text colour is always some kind of light grey (dark and light modes) or dark grey (light mode only). On dark theme, setting an account calendar to bright colours doesn't affect the text colour (light text on light background), while the opposite doesn't happen on light theme (text changes colour automatically to dark or light according to background colour). Also, the colours themselves are differently applied than expected: changing an account colour to white while in dark mode changes it to a whitish purple instead of actual white, while changing it to black on light mode changes it to dark grey. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10 Package: gnome-calendar 41.0-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-20.20-generic 5.13.14 Uname: Linux 5.13.0-20-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu70 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Sat Oct 23 19:10:08 2021 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-calendar InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-04-20 (185 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.10 "Groovy Gorilla" - Release amd64 (20201022) ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= PATH=(custom, user) LANGUAGE=pt_BR:pt:en LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8 SourcePackage: gnome-calendar UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to impish on 2021-10-23 (0 days ago) ** Affects: gnome-calendar (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug impish wayland-session ** Attachment added: "Screenshots of light and dark mode with account color set to black or white" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948556/+attachment/5535476/+files/screenshots.zip -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-calendar in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948556 Title: calendar has low contrast in both default themes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-calendar/+bug/1948556/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1948553] [NEW] Gimp 2.10.28 crashes using oilify filter
Public bug reported:
```
GNU Image Manipulation Program version 2.10.28
git-describe: GIMP_2_10_28
Build: unknown rev 0 for linux
# C compiler #
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/9/lto-wrapper
OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES=nvptx-none:hsa
OFFLOAD_TARGET_DEFAULT=1
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu
9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-9/README.Bugs
--enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,gm2 --prefix=/usr
--with-gcc-major-version-only --program-suffix=-9
--program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id
--libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix
--libdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug
--enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new
--enable-gnu-unique-object --disable-vtable-verify --enable-plugin
--enable-default-pie --with-system-zlib --with-target-system-zlib=auto
--enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-multiarch --disable-werror --with-arch-32=i686
--with-abi=m64 --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --enable-multilib
--with-tune=generic
--enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-9-HskZEa/gcc-9-9.3.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,hsa
--without-cuda-driver --enable-checking=release --build=x86_64-linux-gnu
--host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 9.3.0 (Ubuntu 9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04)
# Libraries #
using babl version 0.1.88 (compiled against version 0.1.88)
using GEGL version 0.4.32 (compiled against version 0.4.32)
using GLib version 2.64.6 (compiled against version 2.64.6)
using GdkPixbuf version 2.40.0 (compiled against version 2.40.0)
using GTK+ version 2.24.32 (compiled against version 2.24.32)
using Pango version 1.44.7 (compiled against version 1.44.7)
using Fontconfig version 2.13.1 (compiled against version 2.13.1)
using Cairo version 1.16.0 (compiled against version 1.16.0)
```
> fatal error: Segmentation fault
Stack trace:
```
# Stack traces obtained from PID 5910 - Thread 5910 #
[New LWP 5913]
[New LWP 5914]
[New LWP 5915]
[New LWP 5917]
[New LWP 5918]
[New LWP 5919]
[New LWP 5921]
[New LWP 5969]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
__libc_read (nbytes=256, buf=0x7ffea23e0a00, fd=20) at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/read.c:26
Id Target Id Frame
* 1Thread 0x7fcd1e303340 (LWP 5910) "gimp-2.10"__libc_read (nbytes=256,
buf=0x7ffea23e0a00, fd=20) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/read.c:26
2Thread 0x7fcd1daf8700 (LWP 5913) "worker" syscall () at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
3Thread 0x7fcd1d2f7700 (LWP 5914) "worker" syscall () at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
4Thread 0x7fcd1caf6700 (LWP 5915) "worker" syscall () at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
5Thread 0x7fcd16e4b700 (LWP 5917) "gmain"0x7fcd1f13faff in
__GI___poll (fds=0x56546cb54e40, nfds=2, timeout=-1) at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/poll.c:29
6Thread 0x7fcd1664a700 (LWP 5918) "dconf worker" 0x7fcd1f13faff in
__GI___poll (fds=0x56546cb55e80, nfds=1, timeout=-1) at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/poll.c:29
7Thread 0x7fcd15e49700 (LWP 5919) "gdbus"0x7fcd1f13faff in
__GI___poll (fds=0x7fcd5ad0, nfds=3, timeout=-1) at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/poll.c:29
8Thread 0x7fccf3693700 (LWP 5921) "async"syscall () at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
9Thread 0x7fcd15648700 (LWP 5969) "swap writer" syscall () at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
Thread 9 (Thread 0x7fcd15648700 (LWP 5969)):
#0 syscall () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
#1 0x7fcd1f435623 in g_cond_wait () at
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
#2 0x7fcd1f93d2bd in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgegl-0.4.so.0
#3 0x7fcd1f411ad1 in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
#4 0x7fcd1f225609 in start_thread (arg=) at
pthread_create.c:477
ret =
pd =
unwind_buf = {cancel_jmp_buf = {{jmp_buf = {140518803932928,
431938799236044243, 140731620396942, 140731620396943, 140731620397088,
140518803929216, -404016903583148589, -404004243032353325}, mask_was_saved =
0}}, priv = {pad = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, data = {prev = 0x0, cleanup = 0x0,
canceltype = 0}}}
not_first_call = 0
#5 0x7fcd1f14c293 in clone () at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:95
Thread 8 (Thread 0x7fccf3693700 (LWP 5921)):
#0 syscall () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
#1 0x7fcd1f435623 in g_cond_wait () at
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
#2 0x56546a9540b4 in ()
#3 0x7fcd1f411ad1 in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
[Bug 1948544] [NEW] snap libportal error on launch
Public bug reported: dad@dad-TUXEDO-Pulse-15-Gen1:~$ snap install eog eog 40.2 from Canonical✓ installed dad@dad-TUXEDO-Pulse-15-Gen1:~$ snap run eog /snap/eog/602/usr/bin/eog: error while loading shared libraries: libportal.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-19.19-generic 5.13.14 Uname: Linux 5.13.0-19-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu70 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: Budgie:GNOME Date: Sat Oct 23 20:06:08 2021 InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-07-24 (90 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Budgie 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Alpha amd64 (20210724) Snap: eog 40.2 (stable) SnapSource: ubuntu/+source/eog UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: eog (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug impish snap -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to eog in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948544 Title: snap libportal error on launch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/1948544/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1948010] Re: photo comment changed in "binary comment"
Thanks. It's a new problem with this version. I used already these comments before without problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to shotwell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948010 Title: photo comment changed in "binary comment" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/1948010/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1948521] [NEW] SMTP: does not wait for the "real" response
Public bug reported: evolution goes on with "mail from" though the "real" response to AUTH PALIN has not received here a debug protocol [SMTP] Connecting to server securesmtp.t-online.de:465 ... [SMTP] received: 220-fwd86.t-online.de T-Online ESMTP receiver fmsad ready. [SMTP] received: 220 T-Online ESMTP receiver securesmtp.t-online.de ready. [SMTP] sending: EHLO apt.cache [SMTP] received: 250-fwd86.t-online.de ready. [SMTP] received: 250-SIZE 52428800 [SMTP] received: 250-8BITMIME [SMTP] received: 250-AUTH=LOGIN PLAIN [SMTP] received: 250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN [SMTP] received: 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES [SMTP] received: 250 HELP [SMTP] sending: AUTH PLAIN ... [SMTP] received: 235-2.5.0 Authentication successful. // 235-2.5.0 this is not the end of the response, but evolution goes on with MAIL FROM [SMTP] Sending with server securesmtp.t-online.de:465 ... [SMTP] sending: MAIL FROM: ... // and now the real 235 came in and evolution reports an error because it wants a 250 [SMTP] received: 235 2.5.0 Authentifizierung erfolgreich. ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948521 Title: SMTP: does not wait for the "real" response To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/1948521/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1936826]
I'm getting this in Fedora 35, found near 100 coredumps on my machine. It looks like Ubuntu has fixed this, any chance we can get this on 34/35 ? I've disabled coredumps entirely in the meantime. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1936826 Title: gnome-shell crashed with SIGSEGV in st_focus_manager_remove_group() [st-focus-manager.c:199] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1936826/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1936826]
*** Bug 2016622 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1936826 Title: gnome-shell crashed with SIGSEGV in st_focus_manager_remove_group() [st-focus-manager.c:199] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1936826/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
