[Bug 1738487] Re: Shell crashes with JS ERROR: TypeError: monitor is null
This doesn't create a crash dump for me, and happens without a suspend/resume/restart -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1738487 Title: Shell crashes with JS ERROR: TypeError: monitor is null To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1738487/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 890779] [NEW] btrfs mounts in raid1 are shown twice
Public bug reported: BTRFS raid1 devices consist of two /dev/sdx nodes, and either can be used to mount the filesystem. One is used to mount each raid1 btrfs filesystem in /etc/fstab. However, nautilus, or possibly some underlying abstraction, decides that each /dev/sdx node must be a different file system, so nautilus shows me double the number of devices. One is marked unmounted and one is already mounted. Clicking on the unmounted one mounts a duplicate. Expected: each BTRFS raid1 file system should only be shown once in nautilus. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: nautilus 1:3.2.1-0ubuntu3.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.20-generic 3.0.4 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4 Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Nov 15 11:46:04 2011 EcryptfsInUse: Yes ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: nautilus UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-09-06 (69 days ago) XsessionErrors: (dropbox:2588): Gdk-CRITICAL **: IA__gdk_window_thaw_toplevel_updates_libgtk_only: assertion `private-update_and_descendants_freeze_count 0' failed (gnome-settings-daemon:2550): libappindicator-WARNING **: Unable to connect to the Notification Watcher: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name :1.69 was not provided by any .service files (gnome-settings-daemon:2550): libappindicator-WARNING **: Unable to connect to the Notification Watcher: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name :1.244 was not provided by any .service files (evince:9177): Gtk-WARNING **: Unable to retrieve the file info for `file:///home/jack/Documents/Projects/Saab%20Sarandos%20bills%20and%20MD%20certificate/SETTLEMENT%20AGREEMENT%20AND%20RELEASE.3.pdf': Error stating file '/home/jack/Documents/Projects/Saab Sarandos bills and MD certificate/SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE.3.pdf': No such file or directory ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug apport-lpi oneiric running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890779 Title: btrfs mounts in raid1 are shown twice To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/890779/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 890779] Re: btrfs mounts in raid1 are shown twice
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890779 Title: btrfs mounts in raid1 are shown twice To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/890779/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 793012] [NEW] file name too long error on copy should give option to rename
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus While trying to move files to file-name encrypted file systems, nautilus gives error file name too long This would be improved by offering the user the chance to rename the file at destination. I'd rather not have the 256 char limit... ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: nautilus 1:2.32.2.1-0ubuntu13 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-9.43-generic 2.6.38.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-9-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Jun 5 05:52:26 2011 EcryptfsInUse: Yes ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: nautilus UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-04-02 (63 days ago) ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/793012 Title: file name too long error on copy should give option to rename -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 793012] Re: file name too long error on copy should give option to rename
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/793012 Title: file name too long error on copy should give option to rename -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 544450] [NEW] drill down + symbols on main screen are on the wrong side
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: rhythmbox Why does rhythmbox think that, unlike every other GUI application for linux, mac or windows, it is a good idea to put the + mini icons to drill down the left side pane on the right-hand side? Everyone else does it on the left. Please be consistent, even if you don't like the prevailing custom. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Mar 22 19:53:40 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/rhythmbox LogAlsaMixer: Simple mixer control 'IEC958',0 Capabilities: pswitch pswitch-joined penum Playback channels: Mono Mono: Playback [off] Package: rhythmbox 0.12.7-0ubuntu7 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-16.25-generic SourcePackage: rhythmbox Uname: Linux 2.6.32-16-generic x86_64 ** Affects: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- drill down + symbols on main screen are on the wrong side https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/544450 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 544450] Re: drill down + symbols on main screen are on the wrong side
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41642738/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: GConfNonDefault.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41642739/GConfNonDefault.txt ** Attachment added: GstreamerVersions.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41642740/GstreamerVersions.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41642742/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41642743/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: XorgLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41642744/XorgLog.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41642745/XsessionErrors.txt -- drill down + symbols on main screen are on the wrong side https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/544450 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 523633] Re: facebook account revealed private email address as alias
i'm afraid I disagree - facebook legitimately provides information about the user who logs in. Empathy then displays this private information to all my contacts. If Empathy cannot tell whether the email address associated with a facebook account is private, it should not use it! how is the bug incomplete? -- facebook account revealed private email address as alias https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/523633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 523633] Re: facebook account revealed private email address as alias
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=610518 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #610518 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=610518 -- facebook account revealed private email address as alias https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/523633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 202873] Re: alacarte crashed with IOError in on_edit_properties_activate()
invalid? still happens. I was editing the Wine submenu. -- alacarte crashed with IOError in on_edit_properties_activate() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202873 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to alacarte in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 403922] [NEW] screensaver does not blank screen if no activity since (auto) login
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-screensaver I am using karmic up to date today (24th July). I have auto-login configured, and haven't changed the default screensaver settings. If I boot the computer and leave it, the auto-login works, and the screensaver activates. However, the screensaver (set to blank screen) does not blank the screen, and I see the normal desktop. (I also see the dialogue to get password to mount other drives - as described in alpha 3 release notes). Moving the mouse causes the screen to fade to black, then immediately return to normal use. Expected action: screensaver activates regardless of whether waiting for a dialogue during boot, or if no activity since boot. ** Affects: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- screensaver does not blank screen if no activity since (auto) login https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403922 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 368788] Re: difficult download location
the default download folder is /home/user/.xchat/downloads - yes it is reproducible. specific steps above. -- difficult download location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368788 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to xchat-gnome in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 368788] [NEW] difficult download location
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xchat-gnome Not sure why the default download folder is hidden away in /home/user/.xchat/downloads This can't have been given a lot of thought. How about /home/user , /home/user/Desktop /home/user/Documents... Anything, but a subfolder of a hidden folder. ** Affects: xchat-gnome (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- difficult download location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368788 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to xchat-gnome in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 44082] Re: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations
give us the ppa and we will test -- GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 342548] Re: Gdm does not allow user to enter user/pass
same issue for me: automatic login works, but ctrl-alt-backspace restarts X to an authentication failure error on the gdm login screen preventing progress. The system boots into the desktop fine. Same critical error in syslog. I had added: @include common-pamkeyring to /etc/pam.d/gdm about to try with this commented out. -- Gdm does not allow user to enter user/pass https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342548 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 338963] Re: Totem: loading Coherence DLNA/UPnP Client results in: ImportError: No module named coherence.ui.av_widgets
n.b. this is marked LOW priority, but it is one of the headline updates for Jaunty - people will look out for this feature. same for me, even with the following workaround in place: /usr/share/dbus-1/services/org.Coherence.service [DBUS Service] Name=org.Coherence Exec=/usr/bin/coherence -o use_dbus:yes -o controlpoint:yes totem --version totem 2.26.0 apt-cache policy totem totem: Installed: 2.26.0-0ubuntu2 Candidate: 2.26.0-0ubuntu2 Version table: *** 2.26.0-0ubuntu2 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status apt-cache policy python-coherence python-coherence: Installed: 0.6.2-1ubuntu1 Candidate: 0.6.2-1ubuntu1 Version table: *** 0.6.2-1ubuntu1 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/universe Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ** Attachment added: upnp totem bug.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24581851/upnp%20totem%20bug.txt -- Totem: loading Coherence DLNA/UPnP Client results in: ImportError: No module named coherence.ui.av_widgets https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338963 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 350329] [NEW] gnome-session-properties dialog is far too small
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-session Admittedly it can be resized, but why does the default opening size need to be so small, forcing almost every user on a monitor bigger than 640x480 to have to open it up. Proposed solution: use maximum height of monitor, or 75% of it, but limit the width, since this is already sufficient. (https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/278964 was closed after resizing was committed, but the initial size issue remains) ** Affects: gnome-session (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gnome-session-properties dialog is far too small https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350329 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 350329] Re: gnome-session-properties dialog is far too small
** Attachment added: Screenshot-Startup Applications Preferences.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24452625/Screenshot-Startup%20Applications%20Preferences.png -- gnome-session-properties dialog is far too small https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350329 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 239952] Re: firefox - the associated helper application does not exist
I get this bug for about one third of all downloads. It may be a server side error, but it seems that it would be worth handling it better in the browser, since it is so common. -- firefox - the associated helper application does not exist https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to epiphany-browser in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 116503] Re: Inconsistency between Copy and Move while Drag and Droping
This is very much still a bug in Jaunty, post alpha 6 Drag on it's own copies (which I think is incorrect - it should MOVE by default - who wants to duplicate menu items?) Drag-ctrl removes the +, indicating it is going to copy, but this is not allowed. (The focus moves to the destination folder after a copy. I think it should stay in the source folder. this is another wishlist item I guess.) I don't know about the Gnome usability requirements, but I strongly expect that we don't match up. ** Tags added: jaunty usability -- Inconsistency between Copy and Move while Drag and Droping https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116503 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to alacarte in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 344829] [NEW] extract zip with absolute path fails
Public bug reported: file-roller fails, but unzip on CLI works okay if -d flag is used. attached file fails in my up-to-date jaunty installation. (n.b. the file is a GPS trace destined for openstreetmap generated by an android app called andnav2) ** Affects: file-roller (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- extract zip with absolute path fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344829 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 344829] Re: extract zip with absolute path fails
** Attachment added: 2009-03-18_Wednesday_12-39-12.gpx.zip http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24047323/2009-03-18_Wednesday_12-39-12.gpx.zip -- extract zip with absolute path fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344829 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 344829] Re: extract zip with absolute path fails
oh, right. Well, I'd strongly suggest that doing this automatically instead of throwing an indecipherable error message would be the desired behaviour. this doesn't seem like a dangerous default. At least, could it say this folder was intended to be unzipped somehwere else (place), do you really want to extract it here? -- extract zip with absolute path fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344829 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 332875] Re: Multiple CD icons on desktop - (Jaunty 9.04 alpha.4)
(jaunty alpha6 +updates to today) -- Multiple CD icons on desktop - (Jaunty 9.04 alpha.4) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332875 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 332875] Re: Multiple CD icons on desktop - (Jaunty 9.04 alpha.4)
I have the same with repeated insertions of the same audio CD. Only one entry appears in Nautilus places, but each iterations adds another desktop icon. All the desktop icons for the CD disappear when I eject it. -- Multiple CD icons on desktop - (Jaunty 9.04 alpha.4) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332875 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 339624] Re: Cannot extract to initial location in dialogue
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23611950/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23611951/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23611953/ProcStatus.txt -- Cannot extract to initial location in dialogue https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339624 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 339624] [NEW] Cannot extract to initial location in dialogue
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: file-roller 1) open archive 2) extract... 3) select okay in file dialogue without changing location 4 expected) = extracted 4 actual) = no response from dialogue But, if you navigate away from Desktop and back to it, extraction to that location is then performed normally. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/file-roller Package: file-roller 2.25.92-0ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: file-roller Uname: Linux 2.6.28-8-generic x86_64 ** Affects: file-roller (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- Cannot extract to initial location in dialogue https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339624 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 337468] Re: Cannot move panels in dual-head non-compiz gnome desktop
I'm afraid I still can't move panels to the right-hand monitor, but thanks for the Alt tip. So this bug stands, although in slightly different form. This may be related to it always booting into Mirrored mode, and I have to change it manually each time. the panels may therefore not know about the second screen. -- Cannot move panels in dual-head non-compiz gnome desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
